Search

T cell-based therapies have induced cancer remissions, though most tumors ultimately progress, reflecting inherent or acquired resistance including antigen escape. Better understanding of how T cells eliminate tumors will help decipher resistance mechanisms. We used a CRISPR/Cas9 screen and identified a necessary role for Fas-FasL in antigen-specific T-cell killing. We also found that Fas-FasL mediated off-target "bystander" killing of antigen-negative tumor cells. This localized bystander cytotoxicity enhanced clearance of antigen-heterogeneous tumors in vivo , a finding that has not been shown previously. Fas-mediated on-target and bystander killing was reproduced in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) and bispecific antibody T-cell models and was augmented by inhibiting regulators of Fas signaling. Tumoral FAS expression alone predicted survival of CAR-T-treated patients in a large clinical trial (NCT02348216). These data suggest strategies to prevent immune escape by targeting both the antigen expression of most tumor cells and the geography of antigen-loss variants. SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates the first report of in vivo Fas-dependent bystander killing of antigen-negative tumors by T cells, a phenomenon that may be contributing to the high response rates of antigen-directed immunotherapies despite tumoral heterogeneity. Small molecules that target the Fas pathway may potentiate this mechanism to prevent cancer relapse. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 521 ., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Tumor immunology has changed the landscape of cancer treatment. Yet, not all patients benefit as cancer immune responsiveness (CIR) remains a limitation in a considerable proportion of cases. The multifactorial determinants of CIR include the genetic makeup of the patient, the genomic instability central to cancer development, the evolutionary emergence of cancer phenotypes under the influence of immune editing, and external modifiers such as demographics, environment, treatment potency, co-morbidities and cancer-independent alterations including immune homeostasis and polymorphisms in the major and minor histocompatibility molecules, cytokines, and chemokines. Based on the premise that cancer is fundamentally a disorder of the genes arising within a cell biologic process, whose deviations from normality determine the rules of engagement with the host's response, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a task force of experts from various disciplines including, immunology, oncology, biophysics, structural biology, molecular and cellular biology, genetics, and bioinformatics to address the complexity of CIR from a holistic view. The task force was launched by a workshop held in San Francisco on May 14-15, 2018 aimed at two preeminent goals: 1) to identify the fundamental questions related to CIR and 2) to create an interactive community of experts that could guide scientific and research priorities by forming a logical progression supported by multiple perspectives to uncover mechanisms of CIR. This workshop was a first step toward a second meeting where the focus would be to address the actionability of some of the questions identified by working groups. In this event, five working groups aimed at defining a path to test hypotheses according to their relevance to human cancer and identifying experimental models closest to human biology, which include: 1) Germline-Genetic, 2) Somatic-Genetic and 3) Genomic-Transcriptional contributions to CIR, 4) Determinant(s) of Immunogenic Cell Death that modulate CIR, and 5) Experimental Models that best represent CIR and its conversion to an immune responsive state. This manuscript summarizes the contributions from each group and should be considered as a first milestone in the path toward a more contemporary understanding of CIR. We appreciate that this effort is far from comprehensive and that other relevant aspects related to CIR such as the microbiome, the individual's recombined T cell and B cell receptors, and the metabolic status of cancer and immune cells were not fully included. These and other important factors will be included in future activities of the taskforce. The taskforce will focus on prioritization and specific actionable approach to answer the identified questions and implementing the collaborations in the follow-up workshop, which will be held in Houston on September 4-5, 2019.

This report is a summary of 'New Cancer Immunotherapy Agents in Development' program, which took place in association with the 31st Annual Meeting of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC), on November 9, 2016 in National Harbor, Maryland. Presenters gave brief overviews of emerging clinical and pre-clinical immune-based agents and combinations, before participating in an extended panel discussion with multidisciplinary leaders, including members of the FDA, leading academic institutions and industrial drug developers, to consider topics relevant to the future of cancer immunotherapy.

In this issue, we are hosting several reviews on topics of broad interests, such as therapeutic or prophylactic antibodies, and the role of autophagy in autoimmunity.

Based on lessons learned with various immune interventions, this review aims to provide a constructive framework for repositioning therapeutic cancer vaccination. Intensive research throughout the past decade has identified key hurdles interfering with the efficacy of cancer vaccines. The vaccination concept still holds promise if positioned appropriately in minimal residual disease and select early disease stage cancer indications. However, in advanced cancer, it must be integrated with complementary immune interventions to ensure reconstruction of a functional immune repertoire and simultaneous blockade of immune inhibiting mechanisms. Vaccination could render complex and integrative immune interventions simpler, safer and more effective. The near future will witness an explosion of activities in the cancer immunotherapy arena, witnessing a rational repositioning of vaccines rather than their extinction.

The current issue of the International Reviews of Immunology brings the latest in three different areas of basic and clinical immunology. First, there is the lingering question of residual HIV-related pathology in patients on chronic antiretroviral therapy. The specific role of Nef in the macrophage-mediated disease manifested through lymphoma, metabolic disease and neurological disorder, is extensively discussed. A second topic is a clinical immunology one, a critical perspective on the efficacy and safety profile of various preparations of immunoglobulin products currently prescribed for a range of immunodeficiencies. Surprisingly, the authors showed that while the available preparations are equivalent from efficacy standpoint, they differ from the standpoint of toxicity. The third subject is again, in the arena of clinical immunology and deals with a relatively rare yet extremely puzzling disease -Takayasu arteritis -with a pathogenesis that needs elucidation and a dire need for better treatments. The authors provide a state of the art in terms of genetic association, other factors possibly involved in the onset and progression of this unusual inflammatory disease of large arteries, and provide a perspective on current standard of care and potential usefulness of TNF-α blockade as therapy for Takayasu arteritis.

This issue of the International Reviews of Immunology hosts a diverse range of topics, ranging from cancer immunotherapy, to severe combined immunodeficiency syndromes in man and alternative treatments for autoimmunity. The emphasis of the issue is on cervical and head and neck carcinoma, significantly related to Human Papilloma Viruses. While the development of anti-HPV prophylactic vaccines represents one of the most remarkable triumphs of modern medicine, there is much more to be done in terms of advancing safe and effective treatments for cervical and head-and-neck cancers. We also host a review on congenital severe combined immunodeficiencies, a field that allowed unprecedented insight into the connection between the immune system, microbes, autoimmunity and cancer. Last but not least, we host a review dedicated to critically analyzing alternative treatments for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, as adjuncts to conventional therapies, based on solid scientific evidence and complementary mechanism of action., (Copyright © Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.)

Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) are tumor-associated antigens implicated in cellular differentiation, genetic stability, and angiogenesis. MKC1106-PP is an immunotherapeutic regimen cotargeting PRAME and PSMA, comprised of a recombinant plasmid (pPRA-PSM encoding fragments derived from both antigens) and 2 peptides (E-PRA and E-PSM derived from PRAME and PSMA, respectively). This multicenter study evaluated MKC1106-PP with a fixed plasmid dose and 2 different peptide doses, administered by intralymph node injection in a prime-boost sequence in human leukocyte antigen-A*0201 and tumor-antigen-positive patients with progressing metastatic solid tumors who had failed standard therapy. Immune monitoring was done by tetramer and enzymatic-linked immune spot analysis. The treatment was well tolerated, with no significant differences in safety, immune response, and clinical outcome relative to peptide doses. Fifteen of 24 evaluable patients showed an immune response, as defined by the expansion of PRAME-specific or PSMA-specific T cells in the blood. There were no partial or complete responses by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Seven patients showed stable disease (SD) for 6 months or longer, or prostate specific antigen decline: 4 of 10 with prostate carcinoma, 2 of 2 with renal clear cell carcinoma, and 1 of 10 with metastatic melanoma. In addition, there was an association between the induction and persistence of antigen-specific T cells in blood above baseline levels and disease control, defined as SD for 6 months or longer. These results support further development of MKC1106-PP in specific clinical indications.

Purpose: The goal of this study was to investigate the therapeutic potential of a novel immunotherapy strategy resulting in immunity to localized or metastatic human papillomavirus 16-transformed murine tumors., Experimental Design: Animals bearing E7-expressing tumors were coimmunized by lymph node injection with E7 49-57 antigen and TLR3-ligand (synthetic dsRNA). Immune responses were measured by flow cytometry and antitumor efficacy was evaluated by tumor size and survival. In situ cytotoxicity assays and identification of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and T regulatory cells were used to assess the mechanisms of treatment resistance in bulky disease. Chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide was explored to augment immunotherapy in late-stage disease., Results: In therapeutic and prophylactic settings, immunization resulted in a considerable expansion of E7 49-57 antigen-specific T lymphocytes in the range of 1/10 CD8(+) T cells. The resulting immunity was effective in suppressing disease progression and mortality in a pulmonary metastatic disease model. Therapeutic immunization resulted in control of isolated tumors up to a certain volume, and correlated with antitumor immune responses measured in blood. In situ analysis showed that within bulky tumors, T-cell function was affected by negative regulatory mechanisms linked to an increase in T regulatory cells and could be overcome by cyclophosphamide treatment in conjunction with immunization., Conclusions: This study highlights a novel cancer immunotherapy platform with potential for translatability to the clinic and suggests its potential usefulness for controlling metastatic disease, solid tumors of limited size, or larger tumors when combined with cytotoxic agents that reduce the number of tumor-infiltrating T regulatory cells.

The ultimate goal for autoimmune immunotherapy is to achieve a specific downregulation or modification of autoaggressive immune responses while leaving in place the normal repertoire, capable of mediating antimicrobial responses. A multitude of preclinical studies, particularly during the last 15 years, raised hopes that self-antigens could be used to achieve the goal of specific immune modulation. Difficulties associated with the translation of this concept to the clinic revealed inherent limitations of antigen-based immune modulation. To increase the efficiency of antigen-dependent immune modulation, researchers started to investigate novel vectors for antigen delivery. Plasmid vectors, as opposed to protein antigens or peptides, have the ability to trigger prolonged production of limited amounts of antigen in the periphery. However, one complicating factor may be the inherent "danger" signal stimulated by the nature of the unmethylated CpG motifs on bacterial plasmid. Currently, various approaches are being explored to improve the efficacy of response while ameliorating the safety concerns of plasmids as immunotherapeutic tools. This manuscript offers a perspective on such efforts and outlines how the knowledge accumulated in the process will help scientists advance to the next generation of immunotherapeutics.

The development of clinically functional chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is the culmination of multiple advances over the last three decades. Axicabtagene ciloleucel (formerly KTE-C19) is an anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy in development for patients with refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL) and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBCL). Axicabtagene ciloleucel is manufactured from patients' own peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) during which T cells are engineered to express a CAR that redirects them to recognize CD19-expressing cells. Clinical trials have demonstrated the feasibility of manufacturing axicabtagene ciloleucel in a centralized facility for use in multicenter clinical trials and have demonstrated potent antitumor activity in patients with refractory DLBCL. Main acute toxicities are cytokine release syndrome and neurologic events. Axicabtagene ciloleucel holds promise for the treatment of patients with CD19-positive malignancies, including refractory DLBCL.

BackgroundIn a phase 1 trial, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, showed efficacy in patients with refractory large B-cell lymphoma after the failure of conventional therapy.MethodsIn this multicenter, phase 2 trial, we enrolled 111 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, or transformed follicular lymphoma who had refractory disease despite undergoing recommended prior therapy. Patients received a target dose of 2×106 anti-CD19 CAR T cells per kilogram of body weight after receiving a conditioning regimen of low-dose cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. The primary end point was the rate of objective response (calculated as the combined rates of complete response and partial response). Secondary end points included overall survival, safety, and biomarker assessments.ResultsAmong the 111 patients who were enrolled, axi-cel was successfully manufactured for 110 (99%) and administered to 101 (91%). The objective response rate was 82%, and the complete response rate was 54%.With a median follow-up of 15.4 months, 42% of the patients continued to have a response, with 40% continuing to have a complete response. The overall rate of survival at 18 months was 52%. The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher during treatment were neutropenia (in 78% of the patients), anemia (in 43%), and thrombocytopenia (in 38%). Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome and neurologic events occurred in 13% and 28% of the patients, respectively. Three of the patients died during treatment. Higher CAR T-cell levels in blood were associated with response.ConclusionsIn this multicenter study, patients with refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received CAR T-cell therapy with axi-cel had high levels of durable response, with a safety profile that included myelosuppression, the cytokine release syndrome, and neurologic events. (Funded by Kite Pharma and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Therapy Acceleration Program; ZUMA-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02348216 .).

This report is a summary of 'New Cancer Immunotherapy Agents in Development' program, which took place in association with the 31st Annual Meeting of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC), on November 9, 2016 in National Harbor, Maryland. Presenters gave brief overviews of emerging clinical and pre-clinical immune-based agents and combinations, before participating in an extended panel discussion with multidisciplinary leaders, including members of the FDA, leading academic institutions and industrial drug developers, to consider topics relevant to the future of cancer immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Investigators from academia and industry gathered on August 14, 2014, in Boston at the Inaugural ImVacS conference entitled "Target Discovery for T Cell Therapy: Next Step to Advance Immunotherapies". Novel targets, discovery strategies and enabling technologies were presented and discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A current paradigm in immunology is that the strength of T cell responses is governed by antigen dose, localization, and costimulatory signals. This study investigates the influence of antigen kinetics on CD8 T cell responses in mice. A fixed cumulative antigen dose was administered by different schedules to produce distinct dose-kinetics. Antigenic stimulation increasing exponentially over days was a stronger stimulus for CD8 T cells and antiviral immunity than a single dose or multiple dosing with daily equal doses. The same was observed for dendritic cell vaccination, with regard to T cell and anti-tumor responses, and for T cells stimulated in vitro. In conclusion, stimulation kinetics perse was shown to be a separate parameter of immunogenicity. These findings warrant a revision of current immunization models and have implications for vaccine development and immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Investigators from academia and industry gathered on April 4 and 5, 2013, in Washington DC at the Arrowhead’s 2nd Annual Cancer Immunotherapy Conference. Two complementary concepts were discussed: cancer “stem cells” as targets and therapeutic platforms based on stem cells.

This issue of the International Reviews of Immunology is dedicated to several topics: cancer immunotherapy, and basic and translational aspects of immunity. Two reviews, one focused on breast and the other on lung cancer, highlight the need to redefine the cancer testes antigens (CTAs) as novel information regarding their expression profile and biological role emerges. Two other reviews showcase pivotal molecules that keep in check immunity at two different levels: the transcription factor autoimmune regulator (AIRE) important to negative selection of the T-cell repertoire, and CD22 that limits the antigen-initiated B-cell response. Two other articles focus on the debated role of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and inflammation in general, in ischemia-reperfusion lesions that follow cardiovascular disorders and stroke. Last but not the least, this issue hosts a review that discusses the role and translational potential of the α4 integrin for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This issue of the International Reviews of Immunology hosts a diverse range of topics, ranging from cancer immunotherapy, to severe combined immunodeficiency syndromes in man and alternative treatments for autoimmunity. The emphasis of the issue is on cervical and head and neck carcinoma, significantly related to Human Papilloma Viruses. While the development of anti-HPV prophylactic vaccines represents one of the most remarkable triumphs of modern medicine, there is much more to be done in terms of advancing safe and effective treatments for cervical and head-and-neck cancers. We also host a review on congenital severe combined immunodeficiencies, a field that allowed unprecedented insight into the connection between the immune system, microbes, autoimmunity and cancer. Last but not least, we host a review dedicated to critically analyzing alternative treatments for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, as adjuncts to conventional therapies, based on solid scientific evidence and complementary mechanism of action. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]