Search

Objectives: To evaluate effectiveness and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in uveitis due to immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID)., Methods: Multicentre study of CZP-treated patients with IMID uveitis refractory to conventional immunosuppressant. Effectiveness was assessed through the following ocular parameters: best-corrected visual acuity, anterior chamber cells, vitritis, macular thickness and retinal vasculitis. These variables were compared between the baseline, and first week, first, third, sixth months, first and second year., Results: We studied 80 (33 men/47 women) patients (111 affected eyes) with a mean age of 41.6±11.7 years. The IMID included were: spondyloarthritis (n=43), Behçet's disease (n=10), psoriatic arthritis (n=8), Crohn's disease (n=4), sarcoidosis (n=2), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (n=1), reactive arthritis (n=1), rheumatoid arthritis (n=1), relapsing polychondritis (n=1), CONCLUSIONS: CZP seems to be effective and safe in uveitis related to different IMID, even in patients refractory to previous biological drugs., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JLM-V received grants/research support from AbbVie, Pfizer, Lilly, Celgene, Janssen, and UCB Pharma. VC-R received grants/research support from MSD and Roche and had consultation fees/participation in the company-sponsored speaker’s bureau from AbbVie, Lilly, Celgene, Grünenthal and UCB Pharma. LS-B received grants/research support from Roche, Lilly and Pfizer. EB-C had consultation fees/participation in the company-sponsored speaker’s bureau from AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis y UCB. PF received grants/research supports from Sobi and Novartis and had consultation fees/participation in the company-sponsored speaker’s bureau from Sobi and Novartis. AGM received consultation fees from Novartis and Amgem and sponsored speaker’s bureau from Novartis, Jansen, Amgen, UCB and Grünenthal. MC-C was a lecturer for AbbVie, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Allergan and UCB. He also participated in Advisory Boards for AbbVie and Allergan. He also had travel grants from AbbVie, UCB and Allergan. RV had consultation fees/participation in the company-sponsored speaker’s bureau from AbbVie, Pfizer, MSD, UCB, Gebro, Celgene, Janssen, Bristol Myers, Lilly, Galápagos, Amgen. CF-C received honoraria for lectures/presentations from AbbVie, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB; consulting fees from AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis and UCB and support for attending meetings from AbbVie, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Roche and UCB. JLH received grants/research support from Amgen and participation in company-sponsored speaker’s bureau from Amgen, MSD and Novartis. RB received grants/research support from AbbVie, MSD and Roche, and had consultation fees/participation in a company-sponsored speaker’s bureau from AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol Myers, Janssen and MSD., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: To assess efficacy and safety of biologic therapy (BT) in neurobehçet's disease (NBD) refractory to glucocorticoids and at least one conventional immunosuppressive drug., Methods: Open-label, national, multicentre study. NBD diagnosis was based on the International Consensus Recommendation criteria. Outcome variables were efficacy and safety. Main efficacy outcome was clinical remission. Other outcome variables analysed were glucocorticoid-sparing effect and improvement in laboratory parameters., Results: We studied 41 patients [21 women; age 40.6 (10.8) years]. Neurological damage was parenchymal (n = 33, 80.5%) and non-parenchymal (n = 17, 41.5%). First BTs used were infliximab (n = 19), adalimumab (n = 14), golimumab (n = 3), tocilizumab (n = 3) and etanercept (n = 2). After 6 months of BT, neurological remission was complete (n = 23, 56.1%), partial (n = 15, 37.6%) and no response (n = 3, 7.3%). In addition, median (IQR) dose of oral prednisone decreased from 60 (30-60) mg/day at the initial visit to 5 (3.8-10) mg/day after 6 months (P < 0.001). It was also the case for mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate [31.5 (25.6)-15.3 (11.9) mm/1st h, P = 0.011] and median (IQR) C-reactive protein [1.4 (0.2-12.8) to 0.3 (0.1-3) mg/dl, P = 0.001]. After a mean follow-up of 57.5 months, partial or complete neurological remission persisted in 37 patients (90.2%). BT was switched in 22 cases (53.6%) due to inefficacy (n = 16) or adverse events (AEs) (n = 6) and discontinued due to complete prolonged remission (n = 3) or severe AE (n = 1). Serious AEs were observed in two patients under infliximab treatment., Conclusions: BT appears to be effective and relatively safe in refractory NBD., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of TCZ in monotherapy (TCZ MONO ) vs. combined with conventional immunosuppressive drugs (TCZ COMBO ) in Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) in a clinical practice scenario., Methods: Multicenter study of 134 patients with refractory GCA. Patients on TCZ MONO (n = 82) were compared with those on TCZ COMBO (n = 52). Drugs were methotrexate (MTX) (n = 48), azathioprine (n = 3), and leflunomide (n = 1). The main outcomes were: prolonged remission (normalization of clinical and laboratory parameters for at least 6 months) and the number of relapses., Results: Patients on TCZ COMBO were younger (68.8 ± 8.0 vs 71.2 ± 9.0 years; p = 0.04), with a trend to a longer GCA duration (median [IQR],18.5 [6.25-34.0] vs. 13.0 [7.75-33.5] months; p = 0.333), higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (2.1[1-4.7] vs 1.2 [0.2-2.4] mg/dL; p = 0.003), and more prevalence of extra-cranial large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) (57% vs. 34.1%; p = 0.007). In both groups, rapid and sustained improvement was observed. Despite the longer GCA duration, and the higher CRP levels and prevalence of LVV in the TCZ COMBO , the improvement was similar in both groups at 12 months. Moreover, in the TCZ COMBO group, prolonged remission was significantly higher at 12-month. Relapses and serious adverse events were similar in both groups., Conclusion: In clinical practice, TCZ in monotherapy or combined with conventional immunosuppressive agents is effective and safe in patients with GCA. Nevertheless, the addition of immunosuppressive drugs, usually MTX, seems to allow a higher rate of prolonged remission, even in patients with a longer GCA duration, more extra-cranial LVV involvement, and higher acute-phase reactants., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Disclosures that might be interpreted as constituting possible conflict(s) of interest for the study: Dr. Mónica Calderón-Goercke attendance at conferences Lilly, Abbvie, and Pfizer. Dr. S. Castañeda is assistant professor, cátedra EPID-Future, funded by UAM-Roche, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM). Dr. Vicente Aldasoro had consultation fees/participation in company-sponsored speaker´s bureau from Janssen, BMS, MSD, Roche, Sanofi, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, Lilly, Abbvie, Gebro, Nordic, Lacer, Alter, UCB, ASAC Pharma, Menarini and Celgene. Dr. Eva Pérez-Pampín had consultation fees/participation in company-sponsored speaker´s bureau from MSD, BMS, Janssen, Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Lilly, Celgene, and Nordic. Dr. Francisca Sivera received grants from Roche. Dr. Eugenio De Miguel had consultation fees/participation in company-sponsored speaker´s bureau from Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer, BMS, MSD, UCB, Roche, Grünenthal and Janssen. Dr. Diana Prieto-Peña attendance at conferences Lilly, Roche, and Pfizer. Prof. José L. Hernández received grants from Amgen and had participation in company-sponsored speaker´s bureau from Amgen, MSD, Bayer, and Esteve. Dr. MA Gonzalez-Gay received grants/research supports from Abbvie, MSD, and Roche, and had consultation fees/participation in company-sponsored speaker´s bureau from Pfizer, Celgene, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Lilly. Dr. R Blanco received grants/research supports from Abbvie, MSD, and Roche, and had consultation fees/participation in company-sponsored speaker´s bureau from Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, BMS, Janssen, and MSD. No financial disclosures declared: Ignacio Villa, Clara Moriano, Susana Romero-Yuste, Javier Narváez, Catalina Gómez-Arango, Rafael Melero, Elena Becerra-Fernández, Marcelino Revenga, Noelia Álvarez-Rivas, and Carles Galisteo., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown efficacy in clinical trials on giant cell arteritis (GCA). Real-world data are scarce. Our objective was to assess efficacy and safety of TCZ in unselected patients with GCA in clinical practice Methods: Observational, open-label multicenter study from 40 national referral centers of GCA patients treated with TCZ due to inefficacy or adverse events of previous therapy. Outcomes variables were improvement of clinical features, acute phase reactants, glucocorticoid-sparing effect, prolonged remission and relapses. A comparative study was performed: (a) TCZ route (SC vs. IV); (b) GCA duration (≤6 vs. >6 months); (c) serious infections (with or without); (d) ≤15 vs. >15 mg/day at TCZ onset., Results: 134 patients; mean age, 73.0 ± 8.8 years. TCZ was started after a median [IQR] time from GCA diagnosis of 13.5 [5.0-33.5] months. Ninety-eight (73.1%) patients had received immunosuppressive agents. After 1 month of TCZ 93.9% experienced clinical improvement. Reduction of CRP from 1.7 [0.4-3.2] to 0.11 [0.05-0.5] mg/dL (p < 0.0001), ESR from 33 [14.5-61] to 6 [2-12] mm/1st hour (p < 0.0001) and decrease in patients with anemia from 16.4% to 3.8% (p < 0.0001) were observed. Regardless of administration route or disease duration, clinical improvement leading to remission at 6, 12, 18, 24 months was observed in 55.5%, 70.4%, 69.2% and 90% of patients. Most relevant adverse side-effect was serious infections (10.6/100 patients-year), associated with higher doses of prednisone during the first three months of therapy., Conclusion: In clinical practice, TCZ yields a rapid and maintained improvement of refractory GCA. Serious infections appear to be higher than in clinical trials., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)