Search

Tacrolimus is pivotal in pancreas transplants but poses challenges in maintaining optimal levels due to recipient differences. This study aimed to explore the utility of time spent below the therapeutic range and intrapatient variability in predicting rejection and de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) development in pancreas graft recipients. This retrospective unicentric study included adult pancreas transplant recipients between January 2006 and July 2020. Recorded variables included demographics, immunosuppression details, HLA matching, biopsy results, dnDSA development, and clinical parameters. Statistical analysis included ROC curves, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. A total of 131 patients were included. Those with biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR, 12.2%) had more time (39.9% ± 24% vs. 25.72% ± 21.57%, p = 0.016) and tests (41.95% ± 13.57% vs. 29.96% ± 17.33%, p = 0.009) below therapeutic range. Specific cutoffs of 31.5% for time and 34% for tests below the therapeutic range showed a high negative predictive value for BPAR (93.98% and 93.1%, respectively). Similarly, patients with more than 34% of tests below the therapeutic range were associated with dnDSA appearance (38.9% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.012; OR 6.135, 1.346-27.78). In pancreas transplantation, maintaining optimal tacrolimus levels is crucial. Suboptimal test percentages below the therapeutic range prove valuable in identifying acute graft rejection risk., Competing Interests: D-RE has received expenditures on travel, hospitality and conferences by Chiesi. PV-A has received expenditures on travel, hospitality and conferences by Chiesi and Astellas. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Rodríguez-Espinosa, Broseta, Montagud-Marrahí, Arana, Ferrer, Cuatrecasas, Garcia-Criado, Amor, Diekmann and Ventura-Aguiar.)

Background: Sirolimus is an established immunosuppressant in renal transplantation with antineoplastic and antiviral features, but side effects like proteinuria limit its use. The aim of this retrospective multicenter observational study is to define predictors for determining which patients most likely benefit from a sirolimus-based therapy., Methods: All patients from 10 German centers that were switched to a sirolimus-containing maintenance immunosuppression in 2000 to 2008 after 3 months or later post-transplantation were enrolled (n = 726). Observation times after switching to sirolimus ranged from 4 days to 9 years (median: 24.3 months). With multinomial logistic regression, risk factors for the endpoints terminal graft failure and withdrawal of sirolimus therapy compared to successful therapy were identified., Results: Successful sirolimus therapy was observed in 304 patients. Forty patients died with functioning graft. Therapy failures included graft loss (n = 106) and sirolimus-discontinuation for various reasons (n = 276). Successful sirolimus-use was predicted in 83% and graft failure in 65%, whereas prediction of deliberate sirolimus-discontinuation was poor (48%). Most favorable results for sirolimus-use were observed in patients switched in 2006 to 2008. Using ROC analysis, an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 32 mL/min was shown to be the cut-off in patients withdrawing from therapy as a result of renal reasons, as well as in patients with graft loss. Proteinuria above 151 mg/L was shown to be predictive for patients with graft failure., Conclusions: eGFR and proteinuria are the major determinants for successful sirolimus-therapy. Our findings help stratifying patients who will benefit most from this therapy and avoid toxicities in patients without potential benefits for this therapy., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: It is commonly believed that mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) should not be used in high-immunological risk kidney transplant recipients due to a perceived increased risk of rejection. However, almost all trials that examined the association of optimal-dose mTORi with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) have excluded hypersensitized recipients from enrollment., Methods: To shed light on this issue, we examined 71 consecutive patients with a baseline calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) ≥50% that underwent kidney transplantation from June 2013 to December 2016 in our unit. Immunosuppression was based on CNI (tacrolimus), steroids and alternatively mycophenolic acid (MPA; n = 38), or mTORi (either everolimus or sirolimus, n = 33, target trough levels 3-8 ng/mL)., Results: Demographic and immunological risk profiles were similar, and almost 90% of patients in both groups received induction with lymphocyte-depleting agents. Cox-regression analysis of rejection-free survival revealed better results for mTORi versus MPA in terms of biopsy-proven acute rejection (hazard ratio [confidence interval], 0.32 [0.11-0.90], P = 0.031 at univariable analysis and 0.34 [0.11-0.95], P = 0.040 at multivariable analysis). There were no differences in 1-year renal function, Banff chronicity score at 3- and 12-month protocol biopsy and development of de novo donor-specific antibodies. Tacrolimus trough levels along the first year were not different between groups (12-mo levels were 8.72 ± 2.93 and 7.85 ± 3.07 ng/mL for MPA and mTORi group respectively, P = 0.277)., Conclusions: This single-center retrospective cohort analysis suggests that in hypersensitized kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy similar clinical outcomes may be obtained using mTOR inhibitors compared to mycophenolate.

Background: In the developed world, kidney transplantation (KT) in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is well established. Developing countries concentrate 90% of the people living with HIV, but their experience is underreported. Regional differences may affect outcomes., Objectives: We compared the 3-year outcomes of patients with HIV infection receiving a KT in two different countries, in terms of incomes and development., Methods: This was an observational, retrospective, double-center study, including all HIV-infected patients >18 years old undergoing KT., Results: Between 2005 and 2015, 54 KTs were performed (39 in a Brazilian center, and 15 in a Spanish center). Brazilians had less hepatitis C virus co-infection (5% vs 27%, P=.024). Median cold ischemia time was higher in Brazil (25 vs 18 hours, P=.001). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (AR) was higher in Brazil (33% vs 13%, P=.187), as were the number of AR episodes (22 vs 4, P=.063). Patient survival at 3 years was 91.3% in Brazil and 100% in Spain; P=.663. All three cases of death in Brazil were a result of bacterial infections within the first year post transplant. At 3 years, survival free from immunosuppressive changes was lower in Brazil (56% vs 90.9%, P=.036). Raltegravir-based treatment to avoid interaction with calcineurin inhibitor was more prevalent in Spain (80% vs 3%; P<.001). HIV infection remained under control in all patients, with undetectable viral load and no opportunistic infections., Conclusion: Important regional differences exist in the demographics and management of immunosuppression and antiretroviral therapy. These details may influence AR and infectious complications. Non-AIDS infections leading to early mortality in Brazil deserve special attention., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The immunosuppressive combination most commonly used in de novo kidney transplantation comprises a calcineurin inhibitor (CI), tacrolimus, a mycophenolic acid derivative and steroids. The evidence which underlies this practice is based in the Symphony trial with controlled follow-up of one year, in which no comparator group included the combination CI-mTOR inhibitor. Different high-quality clinical trials support the use of everolimus as a standard immunosuppressive drug associated with reduced exposure of a CI in kidney transplantation. This combination could improve health related outcomes in kidney transplantation recipients. The present recommendations constitute an attempt to summarise the scientific evidence supporting this practice, discuss false beliefs, myths and facts, and offer specific guidelines for safe use, avoiding complications., (Copyright © 2016 Sociedad Española de Nefrología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) after kidney transplantation (KT) is associated with poor allograft survival. Current therapies for ABMR are able to deplete B-lymphocytes but do not target plasma cells. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that can eliminate plasma cells and has demonstrated utility in the treatment of ABMR., Methods: A retrospective study was carried out from 2010 to 2014, including all patients with ABMR refractory to conventional treatment who received bortezomib. Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2) ) was administered intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. Renal function, graft survival, follow-up biopsies, and donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were recorded., Results: We identified seven patients. Of these, high immunological risk was found in 6 of 7, preformed DSA were found in 5 of 7, flow cytometry crossmatch was positive in 4 of 7, and desensitization before KTx was provided in 6 of 7 patients. ABMR was diagnosed at a median of 90 days (8-167) post-KT. After bortezomib therapy, renal function improved or stabilized in 5 of 7 patients and progressively deteriorated in 2 of 7, leading to haemodialysis after 7 and 11 months, respectively. Follow-up kidney biopsies showed persistence of ABMR in 2 of 7, chronic active ABMR 3 of 7 and inactive chronic lesions in 2 of 7. DSA titres significantly decreased after treatment (P = 0.028). All patients experienced mild adverse events. After a follow-up of 22 ± 18 months, three grafts were lost (42%) and four remained functioning., Conclusion: Bortezomib could be useful as an adjuvant therapy for ABMR refractory to conventional treatment with acceptable mid-term outcomes in these severe cases. More research is needed to develop strategies to better preserve graft function after refractory ABMR., (© 2015 Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology.)

Donor after cardiac death (DCD) grafts have excellent survival despite the high incidence of delayed graft function (DGF). We assessed the feasibility of a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTOR-I) protocol in uncontrolled DCD kidney transplantation and compared it with brain-dead donor (DBD) transplantation under calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) treatment. This retrospective study (2002-2011) included 109 Maastricht category II DCD patients and 218 standard-criteria DBD as controls. Immunosuppression consisted of polyclonal antibody induction, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and mTOR-I (starting on day 6) in the DCD group and tacrolimus in the DBD group. DGF occurred in 72.5% of the DCD group vs. 26.1% of the DBD group (P = 0.001). Patient survival at 1 year was 99.1% vs. 95.9% (P = 0.112), and graft survival was 89% vs. 92.2% (P = 0.253). Patient survival at 5 years was 85.3% vs. 90.1% (P = 0.340) and graft survival was 85.5% vs. 78.8% (P = 0.166). During the first year, 46.8% (n = 51) of DCD patients were converted to CNI therapy. Serum creatinine at 1 year was 1.5(1.26-2) mg/dl vs. 1.4(1.16-1.8) mg/dl (P = 0.078). At 1 year, the acute rejection rate was 7.3% vs. 12.5% (P = 0.766). mTOR-I-based therapy was not associated with inferior graft function or higher rejection rates than standard CNI therapy. DCD kidney transplantation with an mTOR-I-based protocol is feasible but is associated with a high conversion rate to CNI-based therapy., (© 2015 Steunstichting ESOT.)

Introduction: Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors (sirolimus and everolimus) are a class of immunosuppressive drugs approved for solid organ transplantation (SOT). By inhibiting the ubiquitous mTOR pathway, they present a peculiar safety profile. The increased incidence of serious adverse events in early studies halted the enthusiasm as a kidney sparing alternative to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI)., Areas Covered: Herein we review mTOR inhibitors safety profile for adult organ transplantation, ranging from acute side effects, such as lymphoceles, delayed wound healing, or cytopenias, to long-term ones which increase morbidity and mortality, such as cancer risk and metabolic profile. Infection, proteinuria, and cutaneous safety profiles are also addressed., Expert Opinion: In the authors' opinion, mTOR inhibitors are a safe alternative to standard immunosuppression therapy with CNI and mycophenolate/azathioprine. Mild adverse events can be easily managed with an increased awareness and close monitoring of trough levels. Most serious side effects are dose- and organ-dependent. In kidney and heart transplantation mTOR inhibitors may be safely used as either low-dose de novo or through early-conversion. In the liver, conversion 4 weeks post-transplantation may reduce long-term chronic kidney disease secondary to calcineurin nephrotoxicity, without increasing hepatic artery/portal vein thrombosis.

Cancer in transplant recipients represents a therapeutic challenge even when the patient is already under mTOR inhibitors. A 78-year-old man received a deceased donor kidney transplant in 1993. After 6 months, he developed a multifocal cutaneous and nonvisceral Kaposi's Sarcoma while on cyclosporine immunosuppressant therapy. The patient was converted to sirolimus monotherapy in 2001 with subsequent complete recovery within 2 years. In 2007, the patient was diagnosed with an esophageal adenocarcinoma stage IIA. An esophagectomy was performed without requirement of further treatment. He has continued on sirolimus monotherapy ever since, with no other incidents and no recurrences of either tumor. In this report, we describe an interesting case of a second cancer while on immunosuppressive therapy with anticancer activity. Moreover, the present knowledge of the matter is discussed., (© 2015 Steunstichting ESOT.)

Immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation consists of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based therapy in combination with mycophenolic acid and steroids in most cases. In spite of low acute rejection rates and excellent graft survival, it is associated with major long-term complications, such as cardiovascular events, malignancy, and nephrotoxicity, and does not favor tolerogenic processes. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors in combination with low-dose CNI offer good rejection rates and acceptable allograft function; however, de novo mTOR inhitibor-based treatment in combination with mycophenolate is not widely used due to higher acute rejection rates. Early conversion from a CNI to an mTOR inhibitor is a feasible option in selected patients with a slightly higher acute rejection rate, but equal or better GFR. Costimulation blockade has been proven to facilitate antirejection prophylaxis without CNI-associated side effects. So far, belatacept has been approved in combination with mycophenolate and steroids with better graft function, however, a slightly higher acute rejection rate. Recently, the combination of an mTOR inhibitor and belatacept with lymphocyte-depleting antibody induction and without maintenance steroids has been explored in two pilot studies with very low acute rejection rates, very good graft function, and an acceptable side effect profile., (© 2015 Steunstichting ESOT.)

Background: Induction therapy in renal transplantation reduces the incidence of acute rejection (AR) in expanded criteria donation (ECD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD). We compared the efficacy of Thymoglobulin (Sanofi-Aventis, Spain), ATG Fresenius (ATG-Fresenius, Spain), and Simulect (Novartis Farm, Spain) in a calcineurin-free protocol in ECD and DCD renal transplantation by evaluating patient survival, graft survival, and AR at 1 year and overall costs., Methods: An observational retrospective study was performed using our database of 289 consecutive cadaveric ECD renal transplant recipients (n = 178) and DCD recipients (n = 111) from April 1999 to December 2011. Induction therapy consisted of Simulect, Thymoglobulin, and ATG Fresenius. Calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-free maintenance therapy consisted of mycophenolate mofetil or sodium and steroids., Results: There were no differences in the patients' demographic characteristics or patient and graft survival. One-year AR rates were equivalent (ECD: 10%, 19.1%, 17.7% versus DCD: 14.3%, 7.1%, 16.7%). Leukopenia and thrombopenia were significantly more frequent in the ECD group treated with polyclonal induction. The average total cost of transplantation was higher in the ECD group but there were no significant differences in the average total cost between ECD and DCD: 39,970.31 ± 7,732€ versus 35,058.34 ± 6,801€ (P = NS)., Conclusion: Our study shows the same efficacy with polyclonal and monoclonal antibody induction and a CNI-free treatment regimen in ECD and DCD renal transplantation with no differences in overall costs at 1 year after transplantation., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The German Sirolimus Study Group has established a database among 10 transplant centers throughout Germany to study the outcomes in 726 renal transplant patients being converted to a sirolimus-containing therapy between 2000 and 2008 with a total of more than 1500 recorded patient years on therapy. In this study, we present a detailed description of the cohort, of characteristic changes over the observation period, proteinuria and graft survival, and new-onset proteinuria after conversion. Over the study period, age, graft function at the time of conversion, and the proportion of patients switched to sirolimus because of malignancy increased, whereas the proportion of patients with significant proteinuria at conversion decreased. Already modest proteinuria (151-268 mg/L) at conversion and new-onset proteinuria (>500 mg/L) after conversion were associated with inferior graft survival. Even mild proteinuria (>71 mg/L) at conversion was associated with new-onset proteinuria (>500 mg/L) post-conversion. Serum creatinine and urinary protein excretion at conversion together with age at transplantation had a significant impact on patient and graft survival. This large data set confirms and extends previous observations that proteinuria is an important indicator for graft outcome after conversion to sirolimus. We conclude that patients without any proteinuria have the greatest benefit from conversion to sirolimus., (© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Immunosuppression after kidney transplantation has been associated with weight gain. The aim was to evaluate if sirolimus (SRL) had a different effect on weight gain than calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)., Methods: Data on body weight in different patient populations were analyzed at several time points: (a) SRL (CNI-free) versus cyclosporine A (CsA) treatment de novo, (b) CsA+SRL versus CsA (SRL-free) treatment de novo, (c) SRL+tacrolimus elimination at 3 months versus SRL+mycophenolate mofetil versus tacrolimus+mycophenolate mofetil de novo, and (d) conversion from CNI to SRL versus CNI in maintenance patients., Results: Patients were analyzed from de novo transplantation trials (n=1863) and from the conversion study (n=742). At baseline, weight in the SRL-containing and SRL-free treatment arms was not different, but weight gain was significantly less pronounced in SRL in de novo treatment (group 1: 2.8±4.6 vs. 6.2±6.6 kg every 2 years, P=0.020; group 2: 6.1±9.5 vs. 9.6±9.1 kg every 2 years, P<0.001; and group 3: 3.7±7.0 vs. 3.5±6.2 vs. 5.9±9.0 kg every 1 year, P=0.042). In the conversion study, patients lost weight in the SRL arm and gained weight in the CNI arm (-1.0±6.0 vs. +1.0±5.1 kg every 2 years; P<0.001)., Conclusion: SRL treatment is associated with less weight gain de novo as well as in late conversion.

The use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTOR-I) after kidney transplantation has been associated with a higher incidence of proteinuria compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). This review will focus on mTOR-I-associated proteinuria in different settings after kidney transplantation: de novo mTOR-I treatment in combination with CNI, de novo mTOR-I-containing and CNI-free treatment, early conversion from a CNI-based regimen to an mTOR-I-based regimen, and late conversion. Some possible mechanisms of mTOR-I-induced proteinuria will also be reviewed., (Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

All immunosuppressive medications require a learning curve that enables clinicians to improve the therapeutic index of agents. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are potentially a less nephrotoxic form of immunosuppression than calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) that has been used in kidney transplant recipients for more than two decades. This drug class has a novel immunosuppressive action, probably mediated in part through inhibition of growth receptor signaling mechanisms. In addition, it has a unique drug toxicity, which is partially dose-related. This medication class also possesses antiproliferative activity, which may be useful in-post-transplant patients with increased atherosclerotic and malignancy risks. mTOR inhibitors have been utilized for de novo immunosuppression with CNIs, corticosteroids, and antimetabolites. mTOR inhibitors also have been used as CNI-sparing agents both early and late post-transplant. Much debate remains over how to best utilize mTOR inhibition in kidney transplantation.

Background and Objective: The clinical manifestation of angioedema ranges from minor facial edema up to life-threatening swelling of mouth and throat. Hereditary defects, drugs, and food allergies may play a role in the development of angioedema. We systematically investigated the incidence of angioedema in renal allograft recipients treated with mTOR inhibitors (mTORis)., Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: All patients in the authors' electronic database who had received mTORis (n = 309) between 2000 and 2008 were identified. Of these, 137 were additionally treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis)., Results: Nine patients (6.6%, 3.8 per 100 treatment years) developed angioedema after a mean period of 123 days under combined therapy with mTORi and ACEi. Among the remaining 172 patients on mTORi, including 119 patients treated with angiotensin-receptor blockers, only two developed angioedema (1.2%, 0.5 per 100 treatment years, P = 0.01). In patients receiving mycophenolate and ACEi (n = 462), 10 instances of angioedema were found (2.1%, 0.8 per 100 treatment years, P = 0.004)., Conclusions: This systematic investigation demonstrated a noticeable incidence of 6.6% angioedema under combined therapy with mTORi and ACEi in kidney transplant recipients. Treatment with either ACEi or mTORi alone resulted in a significantly lower incidence of angioedema, suggesting that this combination should be avoided.

The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate safety and feasibility of sirolimus (SRL) monotherapy in kidney transplant recipients. Patients older than 18 years, with monotherapy prescribed for more than 1 month and at least 6 months of follow-up were included. We analysed the data from 138 patients. Mean time period between transplantation and start of monotherapy was 6.5 +/- 4.1 years.The most frequent reason was minimization of immunosuppression followed by malignancy. Acute rejection rate was 1.4% at 12 months (two episodes). Graft and patient survival were 94.2% and 97.1% respectively. Mean follow-up after initiation of monotherapy was 29.4 months. Two patients died as a result of cardiovascular diseases and two because of malignancy. Percentage of withdrawal from monotherapy was 14%. SRL trough levels were 10.2 +/- 2.3 ng/ml at baseline and 9.6 6 +/- 3.3 ng/ml at 12 months. Mean glomerular filtration rate was 48.4 ml/min/1.73 m(2) at baseline and 47.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2) at 12 months. Proteinuria was 499.7 mg/24 h at baseline and 543 +/- 794 mg/24 h at 12 months. No significant changes in lipids, glucose, or hemoglobin occurred, although the percentage of patients treated with statins and Epo increased at the end of the follow-up. SRL monotherapy is suitable as long-term immunosuppression in selected patients with no significantly increased risk of late acute rejection.

Unlabelled: The aim was to study the influence of sirolimus (SRL) on body weight in a rat model and in kidney transplant patients. Wistar rats (15 weeks old) were either treated with vehicle (VEH; n = 8) or SRL (n = 7) 1.0 mg/kg three times per week for 12 weeks. Body mass and food intake were measured weekly. Adipocyte diameter was determined in hematoxylin-eosin stains. The body mass index (BMI) obtained from clinical kidney transplant trials comparing SRL-based with cyclosporine-based therapy was analyzed., Animals: SRL produced a decrease of the weight gain curve. At the end of the study, mean body weight in the SRL group was lower than in the VEH group (356 vs. 507 g, P < 0.01) in spite of comparable food intake normalized for body weight was not different. Mean adipocyte diameter was 36 mum in VEH and 25 mum in SRL rats (P = 0.009). Mean SRL blood trough concentration was 38 ng/ml. Kidney transplant patients: Two years after transplantation, BMI was significantly lower in the SRL-based treatment arm compared to cyclosporine (24.17 +/- 2.99 vs. 25.97 +/- 5.01 kg/m(2), P = 0.031). SRL treatment leads to less body mass. Adipocyte cell diameter was reduced in SRL-treated animals. A possible explanation may be the effects of SRL on metabolic regulation and cell growth.

The aim was to evaluate long-term graft survival and function after conversion to sirolimus (SRL) for chronic calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity and the predictive value of baseline proteinuria. This is a follow-up conversion study of 59 renal transplant patients with deteriorating graft function and histologic signs of CNI toxicity. Previously, baseline proteinuria <800 mg/day was identified as a short-term predictor for successful conversion. Follow-up was 5.3 +/- 0.8 (3.7-6.8) years. Patient survival was 88%, graft survival 38%. Creatinine clearance at the last follow-up was 33.7 +/- 14 ml/min, proteinuria 826 +/- 860mg/day. Baseline proteinuria <800 mg/day was associated with better graft survival. In a cox analysis including proteinuria >800 mg, glomerular filtration rate, age at conversion, chronic Banff score at conversion and time after transplantation at conversion, higher proteinuria was associated with a relative risk of graft loss of 3.98. Prognosis of chronic allograft dysfunction is poor. However, conversion to SRL remains an option for patients with low baseline proteinuria, which can slow down deterioration of graft function during a follow-up period of up to 5 years.

The reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome (RSDS) in organ transplant recipients has only previously been reported in patients treated with calcineurin inhibitors. We retrospectively analyzed 393 renal transplant patients treated with sirolimus, 9 of whom developed RSDS. All the patients reported varying degrees of pain in the legs, affecting the knees, ankles, and/or feet, plus cutaneous erythema. The onset of pain ranged from 1-6 months after transplantation. At the time of diagnosis of RSDS, the mean serum creatinine was 1.4 mg/dL (range 1.0-1.7) and bone scintigraphy with 99mTc pyrophosphate showed increased uptake in all cases. The symptoms remitted 3-10 months after treatment (mean, 4 months) with calcitriol, with or without nifedipine or calcitonin, and in one case with suppression of sirolimus. We conclude that sirolimus therapy may induce RSDS in renal transplant recipients.

Many kidney transplant patients experience an increase in proteinuria when converted from a calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen to one based on a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, and preexisting proteinuria and poor renal function have been identified as risk factors for this increase. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of sirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, on renal function and histology in a proteinuric model of reduced renal mass. Sirolimus-treated animals had approximately half as much proteinuria as vehicle-treated animals (P < 0.05), and had less glomerulosclerosis, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, and inflammation. Immunohistochemistry showed that sirolimus attenuated the increased expression of renal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), as well as the expression of VEGF receptors 1 and 2. In conclusion, sirolimus halted the progression of proteinuria and structural damage in a rat model of reduced renal mass, possibly through a reduction in renal VEGF activity.

Introduction: Chronic allograft nephropathy, cardiovascular mortality, and posttransplant malignancy are complications of conventional immunosuppression after kidney transplantation. We reported the feasibility of maintenance monotherapy with sirolimus (SRL) in a pilot experience. The aim was to study safety and feasibility of SRL maintenance monotherapy in 50 kidney transplant patients., Methods: All patients from our center with at least 6 months follow-up on SRL monotherapy were included. During the first month after start of SRL monotherapy, follow-up visits were performed weekly, then each month for the following 2 months. Each follow-up visit included a physical exam and laboratory screening., Results: Mean follow-up on SRL monotherapy was 34.7 +/- 14.9 months. The time between transplantation until start of monotherapy was 7.7 +/- 3.3 years. No rejections occurred. During follow-up, two patients died of cardiovascular disease (already diagnosed before monotherapy); one, of previously diagnosed posttransplant malignancy and one, of hepatitis C-related liver failure. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 53 mL/min x 1.73 m2 at start of monotherapy and 50 mL/min x 1.73 m2 after 4 years. Proteinuria was 632 +/- 562 mg/24 hours at 4 years. During the follow-up, no significant changes in the lipid profile, glycemia, or hemoglobin occurred., Conclusions: Sirolimus monotherapy is safe in a selected group of immunological low-risk patients without increasing the risk of rejection.

Introduction: Chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) is the main cause of late transplant failure. Although several etiologies have been postulated, toxicity for calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) is one of the most important causes of CAD, characterized by arteriolar hyalinosis, luminal narrowing, increased glomerulosclerosis, and tubulointerstitial damage. It's known that in transplant patients with CAD, fibrogenic mediators such as transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) are increased. Sirolimus is an immunosuppressive agent with a distinct mechanism of action compared with CNI., Aim: This study assessed variations in levels of fibrogenic mediators among CAD patients treated with CNIs, before and after conversion to sirolimus., Patients and Methods: We studied twelve renal transplant patients with CAD on CNI treatment. TGF-beta in plasma and urine, endothelin-1, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were studied before and 8 months after conversion to sirolimus treatment., Results: TGF-beta urine levels decreased from 24.7 +/- 11.2 to 12.8 +/- 5.1 ng/24 h (P = .049). In plasma, a similar decrease trend was observed (22.2 +/- 32 to 10.3 +/- 3 ng/mL), although it was not significant (P = .079). Endothelin-1 showed a decrease (8.1 +/- 3 to 5.2 +/- 1.1 pmol/L; P = .1) and VEGF in plasma increased from 34.3 +/- 37 to 92.2 +/- 86 pg/mL (P = .051)., Conclusions: Patients undergoing conversion from CNI to sirolimus treatment for CAD presented a significant decrease in TGF-beta urine levels, representing a decreased mediator of the CAD fibrogenic process.

The aim was to evaluate feasibility and safety of calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in high-risk donor kidney transplantation with sequential sirolimus introduction. Kidney transplant patients (n=76) with a donor aged >60 years, donor with acute renal failure, or a nonheartbeating donor were included. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and sequential introduction of sirolimus. One-year patient survival was 96.2% and 95.8%; graft survival was 94.2% and 91.7%; acute rejection rates were 21.2% and 12.4%; delayed graft function was 21.2% and 66.7%; and creatinine clearance was 58+/-20 mL/min and 56+/-21 mL/min for the brain-dead donor group and the nonheartbeating donor group, respectively. Most adverse events were infections, but also three lymphoceles, three urinary fistulas, three wound seromas. Sequential sirolimus introduction in high-risk donor kidney transplantation was found to lead to good patient and graft survival and incidence of acute rejection and delayed graft function.

Background: Sirolimus is an agent with lymphocyte-specific features similar to those of calcineurin inhibitors but with a different mechanism of action and safety profile. To optimize the use of sirolimus-based immunosuppression, further investigation of appropriate pharmacokinetic (sirolimus exposure) and pharmacodynamic (sirolimus T-cell immunomodulator effect) monitoring is required to determine personalized target concentrations., Aim: The main objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of combined pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic monitoring and to apply biomarkers of immunosuppression in stable kidney transplant recipients receiving sirolimus monotherapy., Methods: Fourteen renal transplant patients treated with sirolimus monotherapy (median 2 years) were included in this study. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were evaluated in each patient three times: at inclusion in the study (day 1), then again at 3 and 6 months., Results: The median sirolimus concentration was 11.5 ng/mL. CD4+ T-cell adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentrations (150 ng/mL) and interleukin (IL)-10 production (50.9 ng/mL) were significantly lower in treated patients than in healthy controls (n = 95) [301 ng/mL; 278 ng/mL, respectively]. Median inhibition of T-cell proliferation was 60% (31-96%) in treated patients. Interferon-gamma and transforming growth factor-beta production was found to be similar to those in the healthy controls. Our results suggest an association between low ATP and IL-10 concentrations and the presence of infection., Conclusions: The sequential measurement of these biomarkers in stable renal transplant recipients treated with monotherapy could be useful to evaluate the biological effect of sirolimus in each patient and to establish personalized therapy taking into account the individual response to the drug.

Background: Conversion from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus, rapamycin has become an option in patients with chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD). However, in many cases an increase of proteinuria has been observed. The aim was to characterize the course of this so far unexplained proteinuria after conversion., Methods: In 149 renal transplant patients from various Spanish centres, proteinuria and renal function were analysed 6 months before until 6 months after conversion. Patients were divided into three groups according to mean proteinuria before conversion (1:300-3500 mg/day; 3:>3.5 g/day)., Results: Generally patients showed an increase of proteinuria from 864+/-1441 (0-12125) to 1541+/-1878 (0-10976) mg/day after conversion; P<0.001. Group 1: 145+/-92 vs 669+/-868 mg/day, P<0.001; group 2: 1041+/-799 vs 1995+/-2021 mg/day, P<0.001; group 3: 6205+/-3184 vs 4859+/-2122 mg/day, P=NS. Patients with an increase of proteinuria of >500 mg/day (n=60; 40%) had a higher serum creatinine before conversion compared with patients with no or moderate increase (2.5+/-0.8 vs 2.15+/-0.72 mg/dl; P=0.002). The group that experienced an increase>500 mg/day had a higher serum creatinine after conversion compared with the patients with no or moderate increase (2.8+/-1.0 vs 2.1+/-1.2; P<0.001). Of 64 patients, 19 in group 1 showed an increase>500 mg/day., Conclusion: Conversion for CAD can be associated with an increase of proteinuria in patients with pre-existing renal damage; however, it preserves renal function in patients with better creatinine and proteinuria before conversion, and might not be of benefit if advanced loss of renal function and high proteinuria are already present before conversion.

Background: The study was conducted in order to describe possible intraglomerular haemodynamic changes inducing proteinuria after 14 patients with chronic allograft dysfunction were converted from calcineurin inhibitors (CIs) to sirolimus without changing concomitant immunosuppression or antihypertensive treatment., Methods: Creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), proteinuria, renal functional reserve (RFR) and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) were determined before and 8 months after conversion. Intraglomerular pressure (P(G)), afferent arteriolar resistance (AAR) and efferent arteriolar resistance (EAR) were calculated using Gomez's formula., Results: Creatinine (1.97 vs 2.075 mg/dl; P = 0.270) and GFR (40 vs 43 ml/min; P = 0.505) remained unchanged, proteinuria increased (338 vs 1146 mg/24 h; P = 0.006), RFR decreased (34.84 vs 13.47%; P = 0.019), ERPF (248 vs 310.6 ml/min; P = 0.0625) and P(G) (42.72 vs 46.17 mmHg; P = 0.0625) tendentially increased and AAR tendentially decreased (14.12 vs 10.28 dyne/s/cm(5); P = 0.0625)., Conclusion: After conversion, P(G) shows a tendency to increase and RFR decreases significantly-characteristics of hyperfiltration, which could possibly partially explain the increase of proteinuria. Therefore, the application of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers seems promising. To avoid hyperfiltration, conversion should be performed early when renal insufficiency is still moderate.

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), cardiovascular mortality, and posttransplant malignancy are complications of conventional immunosuppression after kidney transplantation. The aim was to study feasibility of sirolimus (SRL) maintenance monotherapy in a pilot experience. All patients with SRL monotherapy of at least 6 months follow-up were included. In 19 patients, age 58 (34-74) years, SRL monotherapy was introduced 98.1 (49-193) months after transplantation by withdrawing concomitant immunosuppressants from protocols already including SRL or introducing SRL and withdrawing other immunosuppressants. Follow-up is 20.0 (6-41) months. One patient died from hepatocellular carcinoma, diagnosed before SRL monotherapy, with functioning graft. No rejections occurred. SRL trough concentration was 10.7 (4.6-16.1) microg/L. Creatinine (1.77 [1.0-2.9] mg/dL vs. 1.68 [0.8-3.3] mg/dL after 6 months, 1.97 [0.8-4.6] mg/dL at last follow-up; P=NS). Proteinuria increased tendentially (333 [67-893] vs. 890 [46-4011] mg/day). No significant changes of hemoglobin, triglycerides, or cholesterol occurred. SRL monotherapy late after kidney transplantation is feasible in selected patients.

Chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) is a major cause of graft loss in long-term kidney transplant recipients. To identify predictors of successful conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to sirolimus (SRL) we investigated 59 renal transplant patients with CAD without histological signs of acute rejection. They received 12-15 mg SRL once, then 4-5 mg/day, target trough level 8-12 ng/mL. CNI dose was reduced by 50% simultaneously, and withdrawn at 1-2 months. Concomitant immunosuppression remained unchanged. After 1 year patient survival was 100% and graft survival 92%. In responders (54%) creatinine improved (2.75 +/- 0.75 to 2.22 +/- 0.64 mg/dL; p < 0.01). In nonresponders (46%) creatinine deteriorated (3.15 +/- 1.02 to 4.44 +/- 1.60 mg/dL; p < 0.01). Baseline renal function did not differ, however, baseline proteinuria (519 +/- 516 vs. 1532 +/- 867 mg/day, p < 0.01), histological grade of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) (1.2 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.9 +/- 0.6; p < 0.01), grade of vascular fibrous intimal thickening (1.2 +/- 0.7 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.7; p = 0.048) and number of acute rejections before conversion (0.73 +/- 0.69 vs. 1.27 +/- 0.96; p < 0.05) differed significantly between responders and nonresponders. In a multivariate analysis low proteinuria was the only independent variable. Proteinuria below 800 mg/day has a positive predictive value of 90%. Proteinuria at conversion below 800 mg/day is the only independent predictor for positive outcome in conversion from CNI to SRL in CAD.

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS; myfortic, Novartis Pharma AG) is an advanced formulation delivering mycophenolic acid (MPA). EC-MPS was designed to improve MPA-related upper gastrointestinal adverse events by delaying the release of MPA until reaching the small intestine. At a dose of 720 mg, EC-MPS exhibits equivalent MPA exposure (area under the concentration curve [AUC]) and maximal MPA concentration (C(max)) to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; CellCept, Roche AG) 1000 mg. The time to maximal MPA concentration (T(max)) for EC-MPS is delayed relative to that for MMF, consistent with a functioning enteric coating. EC-MPS 720 mg b.i.d. has demonstrated therapeutic equivalence to MMF 1000 mg b.i.d. in renal transplant patients. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that EC-MPS is as effective and safe as MMF in both de novo and maintenance renal transplant patients. Furthermore, studies have confirmed that maintenance patients can be safely converted from MMF to EC-MPS with no compromise of efficacy or safety. EC-MPS therefore presents physicians and patients with a valid alternative MPA therapy with a comparable efficacy and safety profile to MMF.

Unlabelled: Sirolimus (SRL) is an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in kidney transplant patients with chronic allograft dysfunction., Methods: 33 patients were converted to SRL receiving a single loading dose of 15 mg and initial maintenance dose of 5 mg/day. CNI was reduced by 50% on day 1 and tapered during 4-6 weeks after achieving SRL target (8-12 ng/ml). Concomitant immunosuppressive therapy remained unchanged., Results: Patient survival was 100% and graft survival was 85% after 1 year. Mean SRL dose decreased from 5 mg/day initially to 2.8 +/- 1.3 mg/day. SRL dose-adjusted trough concentration did not change significantly over time. Dose-adjusted trough concentrations of CNI before conversion and of SRL after 1 year did not correlate. We observed no severe infections, however, one rejection Banff Ia occurred 7 months after conversion associated with subtherapeutic SRL trough concentration. Adverse events were anemia, dyslipidemia, epistaxis, stomatitis, and bronchiolitis obliterans which occurred mainly during the conversion phase., Conclusion: Overlapping conversion from CNI to SRL in chronic kidney transplant patients is possible and safe. However, further studies are necessary with shorter overlap and lower SRL loading and initial maintenance dose which might lead to a decrease in the high number of adverse events in the overlap phase., (Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Sirolimus damages the testes in animals; however, human data are sparse. We conducted a case-control study to obtain further insight into this issue and compared testosterone, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and prolactin concentrations in matched renal transplant patients who did or did not receive sirolimus. We found that testosterone values were lower (11.2 +/- 6.3 nmol/L vs. 15.5 +/- 7.7 nmol/L, p < 0.05), in 28 sirolimus-treated patients, compared to 28 non-sirolimus-treated controls. Furthermore, these patients more commonly had testosterone concentrations that were below our reference value for normal men. In contrast, FSH and LH concentrations were higher while prolactin levels were not different. These data are consistent with sirolimus-related testosterone suppression and suggest a need for further studies.

Background Antibody-mediated response in solid organ transplantation is critical for graft dysfunction and loss. The use of immunosuppressive agents partially inhibits the B-lymphocyte response leading to a risk of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection. This study evaluated the impact of JAK3 and PKC inhibitors tofacitinib (Tofa) and sotrastaurin (STN), respectively, on B-cell proliferation, apoptosis, and activation in vitro. Methods Human B cells isolated from peripheral blood of healthy volunteers were cocultured with CD40 ligand–transfected fibroblasts as feeder cells in the presence of interleukin (IL) 2, IL-10, and IL-21. The cocultures were treated with immunosuppressants Tofa, STN, and rapamycin (as a control), to analyze the proliferation and apoptosis of B cells by means of Cyquant and flow cytometry, respectively. CD27 and IgG staining were applied to evaluate whether treatments modified the activation of B cells. Results Tofa and STN were able to inhibit B-cell proliferation to the same extent as rapamycin, without inducing cell apoptosis. After 6 days in coculture with feeder cells, all B cells showed CD27 memory B-cell phenotype. None of the immunosuppressive treatments modified the proportion between class-switched and non–class-switched memory B cells observed in nontreated cultures. The high predominance of CD27 + CD24 + phenotype was not modified by any immunosuppressive treatment. Conclusions Our results show that Tofa and STN can suppress B-cell antibody responses to an extent similar to rapamycin, in vitro; therefore these compounds may be a useful therapy against antibody-mediated rejection in transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]