Search

In a 24-month, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial, 715 de novo kidney transplant recipients were randomized at 10-14 weeks to convert to everolimus (n = 359) or remain on standard calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy (n = 356; 231 tacrolimus; 125 cyclosporine), all with mycophenolic acid and steroids. The primary endpoint, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from randomization to month 12, was similar for everolimus versus CNI: mean (standard error) 0.3(1.5) mL/min/1.73 2 versus -1.5(1.5) mL/min/1.73 2 (p = 0.116). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at month 12 was more frequent under everolimus versus CNI overall (9.7% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.014) and versus tacrolimus-treated patients (2.6%, p < 0.001) but similar to cyclosporine-treated patients (8.8%, p = 0.755). Reporting on de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) was limited but suggested more frequent anti-HLA Class I DSA under everolimus. Change in left ventricular mass index was similar. Discontinuation due to adverse events was more frequent with everolimus (23.6%) versus CNI (8.4%). In conclusion, conversion to everolimus at 10-14 weeks posttransplant was associated with renal function similar to that with standard therapy overall. Rates of BPAR were low in all groups, but lower with tacrolimus than everolimus., (© 2016 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Ganciclovir-resistant (GanR) cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after organ transplantation is emerging as a significant therapeutic challenge. We report two cases of GanR CMV infection successfully managed by switching immunosuppression from calcineurin inhibitors to an mTOR inhibitor-based regimen. This salvage therapy should be considered when other options are not available., (© 2012 The Authors. Transplant International © 2012 European Society for Organ Transplantation.)

Introduction and Methods: An epidemiologic multicenter study was performed to evaluate the prevalence and management of gastrointestinal (GI) complications in solid organ transplant patients. A total of 1788 recipients were included, 1132 of which corresponded to renal transplanted patients., Results: The mean age for the renal transplanted patients was 52 +/- 13.2 years. The mean time from the transplantation was 5.4 +/- 5.4 years. 17.7% showed some pretransplant GI disease, while 53% presented this type of complication in the posttransplant period. Diarrhea was the most prevalent GI complication (51.5%) and digestive perforation was the GI disorder that affected the patients daily living the most. From the patients with GI complications, 71% received pharmacological treatment, using gastric protectors in 91.3% of the cases. Regarding immunosuppressive drugs, in 30.9% of the cases the dose of the drug was reduced, in 9.3% discontinued temporarily and in 7.5% discontinued permanently. These changes mainly affected the MMF (89%, 83% and 74% for dose change, temporary and permanent discontinuation, respectively)., Conclusions: The prevalence of GI complications in renal transplant exceeded 50%, and affected patients' daily living. The management of these complications was based on treatment with gastric protectors, dose reduction and/or partial or definitive MMF discontinuation.

Renal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus is a common complication that significantly worsens morbidity and mortality. Although treatment with corticosteroids and cytotoxic drugs may be useful in many cases, morbidity associated with these drugs and the relapsing nature of the disease make it necessary to develop new treatment strategies. Five-month old female NZB/W F1 mice were divided into the following groups: CYP group (n = 10), cyclophosphamide (CYP) 50 mg/kg intraperitoneally every 10 days; RAPA 1 group (n = 10) oral daily sirolimus (SRL), 1 mg/kg; RAPA 12 group (n = 13), oral daily SRL, 12mg/kg; FTY group (n = 10), oral fingolimod (FTY720), 2 mg/kg three times per week. An additional group of 13 non-treated mice were used as a control (control group). Follow-up was performed over four months. Animal survival, body weight, anti-DNA antibodies and proteinuria were determined. Kidneys were processed for conventional histology and immunofluorescence for IgG and complement. Total histological score (HS) was the sum of mesangial expansion, endocapillary proliferation glomerular deposits, extracapillary proliferation, interstitial infiltrates, tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis. All treated groups had lower proteinuria at the end of the follow-up with respect to the control group (P < 0.0001). Serum anti-DNA antibodies were appropriately controlled in RAPA 1 and CYP groups, but not in FTY or RAPA 12 groups. SRL and CYP arrested, and perhaps reversed almost all histological lesions. FTY720 ameliorated histological lesions but did not control mesangial expansion or interstitial infiltrates. SRL produces great improvement in murine lupus nephritis, while FTY720 seems a promising alternative if used in appropriate doses.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (SRL) are potent non-nephrotoxic xenobiotic immunosuppressants. Their complementary properties may provide the rationale for their combination in induction and maintenance regimens. MMF, a reversible inhibitor of inosin monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) acts as an antiproliferative drug; and SRL, an mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitor, inhibits cell proliferation driven by growth factors. Early experiences with the use of the SRL, MMF and steroid combination yielded insufficient prophylaxis of acute rejection. However, the introduction of induction therapy with mono- or polyclonal antilymphocyte antibodies to the SRL-MMF and steroid combination brings an efficient acute rejection prophylaxis, while improving renal function and/or reducing of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). However, adverse events related to the use of this drug combination (mainly haematological and surgery-related) result in a high rate of discontinuations in some trials, which may hamper the potential benefits of this calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-free strategy. Also, currently under investigation is whether in long-term immunosuppression, in MMF-treated patients, CNIs can be replaced by SRL to avoid and/or halt progression of chronic nephropathy and to improve graft survival. However, some authors reported a high proportion of patients with oral ulcers and proteinuria after switching to SRL. In short, refining the use of MMF and SRL may provide a better risk/benefit ratio to pave the way towards non-nephrotoxic immunosuppression.

Introduction: Calcineurin inhibitors may be associated with decreased arterial elasticity and increased vascular risk. We measured pulse wave velocity (PWV) in large or small arteries as an index of elasticity. The aim of our study was to determine aortic and radial arterial elasticity in 30 stable kidney transplant patients treated with calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppression., Patients and Methods: In stable kidney transplant patients we determined the usual biochemical parameters as well as lipid profiles, 24-hour blood pressure (BP) monitoring (CBPM) using a chronobiological program (Garapa), and PWV with a HDI-PWV CR-2000 monitor., Results: Sixteen patients received cyclosporine (CsA, G-1) and 14 tacrolimus (G-2) immunosuppression. There were no baseline differences regarding age (G-1: 56 +/- 12 years, G-2: 56 +/- 14 years), renal transplant follow-up (G-1: 7 +/- 3 years, G-2: 7.5 +/- 3 years), Systolic BP, pulse pressure or plasma creatinine (G-1: 163 +/- 35 umol/L, G-2: 173 +/- 26 umol/L). Patients in the G-1 showed higher diastolic BP (79 +/- 11 vs 74 +/- 8 mm Hg), greater proteinuria (1.26 +/- 0.4 vs 0.6 +/- 0.2 g/d, P < .05), total cholesterol (5.51 +/- 1.2 mmol/L) and low-density lipoprotein (3.08 +/- 0.3 vs 2.99 +/- 0.3 mmol/L, P = NS). Aortic arterial elasticity was decreased in G-1 patients (10.4 +/- 6 vs 14.3 +/- 2 mL/mm Hg x10, P < .05) as well as that in the radial artery (G-1: 5.52 +/- 1 vs 5.57 +/- 1.2 mL/mm Hg x100, P = NS). Almost 100% of the patients presented normal diurnal BP with high nocturnal BP in a nondipper pattern in both groups., Conclusion: Calcineurin immunosuppression may contribute to arterial stiffness in kidney transplant patients. No differences between CsA or tacrolimus were observed in our study. CBPM and PWV are useful tools to evaluate subclinical atherosclerosis in renal transplant patients.

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have played an important role in improving graft survival. However, the balance between preventing immunologic allograft losses and the management of CNI-related nephrotoxicity is still an issue in renal transplantation. There are three major CNI-sparing strategies. CNI MINIMIZATION: The advent of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) allows cyclosporine (CsA) reduction to ameliorate renal function in patients with chronic renal allograft dysfunction, without increasing acute rejection rates. In combination with mTOR inhibitors, very low CNI levels may be sufficient to prevent acute rejection. However, in this association, CNI nephrotoxicity is magnified by pharmacokinetic interaction. CNI WITHDRAWAL: CNI withdrawal has been attempted in regimens containing MMF or sirolimus (SRL). Introduction of MMF in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) followed by CNI withdrawal resulted in stabilization or improvement of renal function and hypertension profile, although there is some risk of acute rejection. In regimes based on SRL, CNI withdrawal is a safety strategy, achieving a sustained improvement of renal function, histology, and graft survival. There is not consensus at all whether MMF should be added or not in patients converted from CNI to mTOR inhibitor. CNI AVOIDANCE: Polyclonal-based regimens with MMF and steroids have shown acceptable acute rejection rates, but high rates of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and opportunistic infections. Conversely, anti-IL-2R in combination with MMF and steroids resulted in 50% incidence of acute rejection, thus suggesting that CNI avoidance is not feasible in a regimen based on MMF. Alternatively, a protocol based on anti-IL-2R induction therapy combined with SRL, MMF, and prednisone has shown an efficient prevention of acute rejection, higher creatinine clearance and lower rate of CAN in comparison with a group treated with CNI. New strategies using costimulation blockade may help in the development of safe CNI-free regimens. In summary, in renal transplantation the new immunosuppressive medications have made feasible old aspirations such as minimization, withdrawal, or even avoidance of CNI.

Background: In renal transplantation the beneficial immunosuppressive effects of cyclosporin (CsA) may be curtailed by its nephrotoxicity, specially in patients receiving a cadaveric allograft from suboptimal donors or at risk of delayed graft function. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) have each demonstrated to be potent immunosuppressants in renal transplantation. In a prospective analysis we have studied the results at 6 months of the combination of MMF, ATG and low-dose steroids in patients with low immunological risk receiving a first cadaveric renal allograft from a suboptimal donor or at risk of delayed graft function., Methods: Patients with preformed reactive antibodies < 500% receiving a first graft from a suboptimal donor (age > or = 40 years, non-heart-beating, acute renal failure, arterial hypertension) or at risk of delayed graft function (cold ischaemia time > or = 24 h) were eligible for this open single-arm pilot trial. From September 1996 to March 1997 we recruited 17 patients. They were treated with MMF 2 g p.o. preoperatively, and after transplantation at 3 g/day; rabbit ATG i.v. at 2 mg/kg preoperatively, and 1.5 mg/kg/day the first day after transplantation, followed by four doses of 1 mg/kg on alternate days; prednisone was given at 0.25 mg/kg/day and reduced progressively to 0.1 mg/kg/day at 3 months. Primary outcomes were incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, delayed graft function, opportunistic infections, graft and patient survival, and the need for introduction of CsA treatment., Results: delayed graft function occurred in two cases (12%). Four of 17 patients (24%) had a biopsy-proven acute rejection (2 grade I and 2 grade II) within the first 3 months after transplantation. CsA was added in two cases with grade II biopsy-proven acute rejection, and in one with grade I biopsy-proven acute rejection. In one patient MMF was replaced by CsA because of gastrointestinal intolerance. Mean serum creatinine 6 months after transplantation was 159+/-59 micromol/1. Cytomegalovirus tissue invasive disease occurred in one patient (6%). At 6 months follow-up all patients are alive with functioning allografts., Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that in low-immunological-risk patients who receive a suboptimal renal allograft or at risk of delayed graft function, the combination of MMF, ATG, and steroids is an efficient immunosuppressive regime that may avoid the use of CsA in 70% of the recipients.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combined with conventional cyclosporine and steroids doses efficiently prevents acute rejection in kidney transplants. However, this regimen has been associated with an increased incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and leukopenia, specially in patients receiving MMF at 3 g/d, suggesting that the combination of two powerful immunosuppressants carries the risk of overimmunosuppression. For this reason, we treated a group of patients with MMF 3 g/d combined with low cyclosporine and steroids doses. Eighty-two kidney transplants performed at two centers and enrolled in the European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study were randomized to receive: A) placebo (n = 27); B) MMF 2 g/d (n = 27); and C) MMF 3 g/d (n = 28). In this double blind study all patients received cyclosporine and steroids at conventional doses. Fifteen kidney transplants enrolled in an MMF open pharmacokinetic study were treated with MMF 3 g/day combined with low cyclosporine and steroid doses (group D). Efficacy was evaluated as the incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection, and safety focused on CMV disease and leukopenia. Patients receiving MMF showed a low incidence of biopsy proven rejection (B) 18.5%; C) 10.7%; and D) 13.3%). Patients of group C had a high incidence of CMV disease (35.7%) when compared with the other groups (lower than 8%). Incidence of leukopenia was higher in patients treated with MMF (B) 25.9%; C) 39.3%; and D) 40%) than in placebo treated patients (7.4%). Patients in group (C) displayed leukopenia mainly in the context of CMV disease, while patients of group (D) had leukopenia not related to CMV infection. All patients of group (D) who presented leukopenia recovered after MMF reduction dose, while in group (C) there were 5 out of 28 patients who required MMF withdrawal. We propose that a reasonable approach to take advantage of a powerful non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressant such as MMF, could be the administration of this drug at 3 g/d from the time of transplantation combined with low CsA and steroid doses.

Background: Acute rejection is an inherent risk of the withdrawal of steroids in renal allograft recipients. Mycophenolate mofetil is a potent immunosuppressant that, when given with cyclosporine (CsA), reduces the incidence of acute rejection and may facilitate discontinuation of steroids without increasing the risk of rejection., Methods: In an open pilot study, steroids were withdrawn from 26 adult cadaveric kidney transplant recipients. Corticosteroids were discontinued between 4 and 30 (mean 17) months after transplantation, and steroid-free follow-up ranged from 7 to 18 (mean 10) months., Results: Mean CsA doses, CsA blood levels, and serum creatinine at the time of steroid withdrawal and at last patient visit after cessation of steroids were 4.2+/-1.2 mg/kg/day and 3+/-0.8 mg/kg/day (P<0.001), 170+/-53 ng/ml and 113+/-34 ng/ml (P<0.001), and 133+/-36 microM/L and 130+/-37 microM/L (NS), respectively. No rejection episodes occurred after steroid withdrawal., Conclusions: This open study shows that corticosteroids can be safely and successfully withdrawn from renal allograft recipients receiving CsA and mycophenolate mofetil.