Search

Background Lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) has been widely used to evaluate non-immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions (NIDHRs). However, the lack of standardization and the low sensitivity have limited its routine diagnostic use. The drug presentation by dendritic cells (DCs) and the assessment of proliferation on effector cells have shown promising results. Flow-cytometry-based methods can help apply these improvements. We aimed to assess the added value of using drug-primed-DCs and the determination of the proliferative response of different lymphocyte subpopulations in NIDHRs. Methods Patients with confirmed NIDHR were evaluated by both conventional (C-LTT) and with drug-primed-DCs LTT (dDC-LTT)analysing the proliferative response in T cells and other effector cell subpopulations by using the fluorescent molecule, carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE). Results The C-LTT showed a significantly lower sensitivity (29.4%) compared with dDC-LTT (61.8%), which was confirmed analysing each particular clinical entity: SJS-TEN (62.5% vs 87.5%), MPE (15% vs 47.4%) and AGEP (33% vs 80%). When including the effector cell subpopulations involved in each clinical entity, CD3+ +CD4+ Th 1 or CD3+ +NK cells in SJS-TEN, CD3+ +CD4+ Th 1+NK cells in MPE and CD3+ +NK cells in AGEP, we could significantly increase the sensitivity of the in vitro test to 100%, 68.4% and 100%, respectively, with an overall sensitivity of 87% and 85% of specificity in NIDHR. Conclusions The use of a flow-cytometry-based test, DCs as drug presenting cells, and focusing on effector cell subpopulations for each clinical entity significantly improved the drug-specific proliferative response in NIDHRs with a unique cellular in vitro test.

Background Analysis of cross-reactivity is necessary for prescribing safe cephalosporins for penicillin allergic patients. Amoxicillin (AX) is the betalactam most often involved in immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHRs), and cefadroxil (CX) the most likely cephalosporin to cross-react with AX, since they share the same R1 side chain, unlike cefuroxime (CO), with a structurally different R1. We aimed to analyse cross-reactivity with CX and CO in patients with confirmed IHRs to AX, including sIgE recognition to AX, CX, CO, and novel synthetic determinants of CX. Methods Fifty-four patients with confirmed IHRs to AX based on skin test (ST) and/or drug provocation test (DPT) were included. Serum sIgE to AX and benzylpenicillin was determined by Radioallergosorbent test (RAST). Two potential determinants of CX, involving intact or modified R1 structure, with open betalactam ring, were synthesised and sIgE evaluated by RAST inhibition assay. Results Tolerance to CX (Group A) was observed in 64.8% cases and cross-reactivity in 35.2% cases (Group B). Cross-reactivity with CO was only found in 1.8% cases from Group B. ST to CX showed a negative predictive value of 94.6%. RAST inhibition assays showed higher recognition to CX as well as to both synthetic determinants (66% of positive cases) in Group B. Conclusions Cross-reactivity with CX in AX allergic patients is 35%, being ST not enough for prediction. R1, although critical for recognition, is not the unique factor. The synthetic determinants of CX, 1-(HOPhG-Ser-Bu) and 2-(pyrazinone) are promising tools for determining in vitro cross-reactivity to CX in AX allergic patients. Background Betalactams (BLs) are the drugs most frequently involved in immediate (IgE-mediated) hypersensitivity reactions (IHRs) [1,2,3], which could be explained by their ability to act as haptens due to their high chemical reactivity against proteins [4, 5]. BL chemical structure is formed by a 4-membered ring (the so-called BL ring) that in penicillins is fused to a 5-membered thiazolidine ring, and in cephalosporins to a 6-membered dihydrothiazine ring (Fig. 1). These drugs have a side chain (R1) bound to the BL ring; besides, cephalosporins have a second side chain (R2) bound to the dihydrothiazine ring, whose chemical structures distinguish the different compounds [6, 7]. Yes

A correct diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) is very important for both the patient and health system. However, DHRs diagnosis is complex, time consuming, requires trained personnel, is not standardized for many drugs, involves procedures not exempt of risk, and in most cases lacks standardized in vivo and in vitro tests. Thus, there is an urgent need for improving the different approaches to diagnose patients with suspected DHRs. In this review, we have analyzed the advances performed in immediate and non-immediate DHRs diagnosis during the last two years and obtained several conclusions: the significant heterogeneity in current practice among centres illustrates the need to re-evaluate, update, and standardize in vivo tests and protocols for the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected drug allergy. Regarding in vitro tests, the latest studies have focused on increasing their sensitivity or on establishing the sensitivity and specificity for the tests performed with new drugs. There seems to be a consensus about combining in vivo and in vitro tests as the best way to increase the diagnostic accuracy.

[EN] BACKGROUND: Quinolones are the second most frequent cause of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to antibiotics. A marked increase in the number of patients with HSRs to quinolones has been detected. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical characteristics of patients with HSRs to quinolones and present methods for their diagnosis. METHODS: Patients attending the allergy unit due to reactions suggestive of HSRs to quinolones were prospectively evaluated between 2005 and 2018. Diagnosis was achieved using clinical history, skin tests (STs), basophil activation tests (BATs), and drug provocation tests (DPTs) if ST and BAT results were negative. RESULTS: We included 128 subjects confirmed as having HSRs to quinolones and 42 found to be tolerant. Anaphylaxis was the most frequent entity in immediate HSRs and was most commonly induced by moxifloxacin. Patients were evaluated a median of 150 days (interquartile range, 60-365 days) after the reaction. Of patients who underwent ST and BAT, 40.7% and 70%, respectively, were positive. DPT with a quinolone was performed in 48 cases, giving results depending on the culprit drug: when moxifloxacin was involved, 62.5% of patients gave a positive DPT result to ciprofloxacin, whereas none reacted to levofloxacin. The risk of HSR was 96 times higher in subjects who reported moxifloxacin-induced anaphylaxis and 18 times higher in those reporting immediate reactions compared with clinical entities induced by quinolones other than moxi-floxacin and nonimmediate reactions. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of HSR to quinolones is complex. The use of clinical history is essential as a first step. BAT shows higher sensitivity than STs. DPTs can be useful for finding safe alternative quinolones., The present study has been supported by the Institute of Health "Carlos III" of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (grants cofounded by European Regional Development Fund: RETIC ARADYALRD16/0006/0001, RD16/0006/0010, RD16/0006/0019, and RD16/0006/0030). I.D. is a clinical investigator (B0001-2017) from Consejeria de Salud of the Andalusian government, Junta de Andalucia. N.P.-S. holds a Rio Hortega research contract (CM17/0014), and E.B. a Juan Rodes research contract (JR18/00049), both from the Institute of Health "Carlos III," Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (grants cofounded by the European Social Fund).

Background The measurement of nasal specific IgE (NsIgE) in local allergic rhinitis (LAR) patients is challenging and shows variability. The objective of this work was to evaluate a minimally-invasive method of direct detection of NsIgE in patients with LAR to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP) using an automated immunoassay. Methods Fifty patients participated (LAR, n = 14; allergic rhinitis (AR), n = 20; healthy controls [HC], n = 16). Detection of NsIgE was performed by direct application of the solid phase of a commercial DP ImmunoCAP® test 24 hours after DP nasal provocation. Results There was no difference in the median volume of secretion absorbed by the solid phase of the ImmunoCAP test in the 3 studied groups (p = 0.17). According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, NsIgE ≥0.1450 was the optimal cutoff point, obtaining in LAR patients 42.86% sensitivity with the highest specificity (100%), and 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity for AR. Conclusion This study demonstrates the detection of NsIgE to DP in LAR by using a simple, commercial device with high specificity.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD) is defined by the combination of chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyps, bronchial asthma, and hypersensitivity reactions involving upper and/or lower airways after the exposure to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and other NSAIDs. However, airway inflammation occurs even in the absence of exposure to these drugs, leading to disease progression with aggressive polyp formation and non-optimal controlled asthma and rhinosinusitis. In this review, we discuss current and potential management strategies of NERD. This management should be multidisciplinary and comprise medical and surgical treatment of the underlying diseases. In order to prevent reactions due to NSAIDs, avoidance of COX-1 inhibitors with provision of safe therapeutic alternatives should be indicated. However, avoidance of NSAIDs does not ensure disappearance of the airway inflammation and this progresses and persists for life. ASA desensitization followed by daily ASA therapy remains the gold standard of NERD treatment. It is indicated in patients with uncontrolled bronchial and nasal symptoms as well as in patients who require NSAID treatment for specific diseases, such as rheumatic or cardiovascular conditions. ASA desensitization improves upper and lower respiratory symptoms, reduces the need for new nasal surgeries and increases quality of life. Different ASA desensitization protocols have been reported, although the addition of intranasal ketorolac and lysine aspirin prior to an oral ASA schedule has made ASA desensitization safer and more efficient. New therapeutic strategies are being investigated and may provide an alternative treatment for those patients in which ASA desensitization are contraindicated or continuous ASA therapy is discontinued because of adverse effects. Among them, biologic agents are an important treatment option, useful for controlling symptoms of the upper and lower airways. More investigation studies into the mechanisms involved in NERD are needed in order to identify additional therapeutic targets.

Nasal provocation test (NPT) with allergens is a simple and safe technique recommended in different diagnostic and research settings. In the daily practice, NPT has proved to be very useful when there are discrepancies between patient’s symptoms and the results of skin or blood testing, for confirming the clinical relevance of a certain allergen in polysensitized patients and also for the diagnosis of new rhinitis phenotypes such as local allergic rhinitis (LAR). In the research field, nasal provocation test with allergens has been widely used in the study of mechanisms of inflammation and allergic response in subjects with allergic rhinitis (AR) and LAR and the study of pathophysiological mechanisms of response allergens to evaluate the therapeutic effect of drugs or immunotherapy in controlled clinical trials. There are key aspects necessary to achieve the best safety and reproducibility of the test, such as the characteristics of the allergen, application techniques, and measurement of the response that must be as objective as possible. The use of short protocols and simple methods of measurement allows the use of NPT in the daily practice as a diagnostic aid and not only a research tool reserved for clinical trials.

In the past years, several investigators have demonstrated the existence of local nasal responses in some patients with typical allergic rhinitis symptoms but without atopy and have defined a new phenotype called local allergic rhinitis (LAR) or 'entopy'. In a percentage of LAR subjects, the upper airway disease is also associated with lower airway symptoms. After the description of this phenotype, the differential diagnosis between LAR and nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) has become a challenge for the clinician. To correctly identify LAR patients is of high importance for treatment and management of these patients, and for an appropriate inclusion of patients in clinical trials and genetics studies. The treatment of LAR patients, in contrast with NAR, is oriented to allergen avoidance and specific treatment. Allergen immunotherapy, the aetiological treatment for allergic respiratory diseases, has demonstrated to be an effective and safe treatment in LAR, increasing immunological tolerance, and reducing the clinical symptoms and the use of medication. In this article, the important and novel aspects of LAR in terms of mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment will be discussed. Also, the involvement of the lower airway and the potential role of IgE in the bronchial disease will be also reviewed.

Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are important antibiotics for the treatment of a wide range of infectious diseases. However, while FQs are generally well-tolerated, both IgE and T cell-mediated hypersensitivity reactions can occur. Moreover, there has been an increase in the prevalence of these reactions in recent decades, probably due to higher levels of consumption. The diagnosis of allergy to FQs is complex and is based on clinical history, skin tests (STs), and determination of the drug-specific IgE using both immunoassays and basophil activation tests (BATs). However, these approaches have sub-optimal sensitivity and specificity: clinical history can be unreliable and overestimate the incidence of reactions, STs show a high rate of false positives, and in vitro tests have low sensitivity. Therefore, drug provocation testing is currently the best method to establish diagnosis; however, it carries certain risks and should be avoided for cases with a history of severe reactions. In order to improve the sensitivity and specificity of in vivo and in vitro methods, it is crucial to fully characterize the FQ antigenic determinants that are recognized by the immunological system. Current data indicate that groups at the C2–C6 positions of their chemical structure may form part of the antigenic determinant recognized by IgE. Moreover, their photostability can affect protein reactivity and therefore the formation of the hapten-carrier. All of these factors influence IgE and T cell recognition, the clinical response, and cross-reactivity and are the key for improving diagnostic methods. Additionally, a previous diagnosis of hypersensitivity to β-lactams has been reported to be a risk factor for FQ hypersensitivity, and this significantly decreases the therapeutic options for treating infectious diseases. Therefore, further studies are needed to obtain an accurate diagnosis, taking into account cross-reactivity, and to find alternative treatments.

Background and objective Suspicion of an acute allergic reaction is a common reason for attending the emergency department (ED). However, there are few comparisons between the initial diagnosis of suspected allergic reaction made in the ED with the definitive diagnosis made subsequently in the allergy department (AD). Objective: To compare details of the initial diagnosis made in the ED relating to allergy with the final diagnosis made in the AD. Methods Patients attending the ED of 2 hospitals with suspected allergic reactions were prospectively enrolled based on key words. A certified allergy specialist reviewed the ED records of these patients and, if these were suggestive of an allergic reaction, the patients were scheduled for further evaluation at the allergy clinic. Results In total, 2000 patients were enrolled between April 2013 and October 2015. Of these, 1333 passed the initial assessment and underwent further evaluation. Of the 1333 patients, 528 underwent an allergological study, and 206 were confirmed as being allergic. With respect to drug allergy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most common triggers, followed by β-lactams; in food allergy, plant-based foods were the most common. Only 16.4% of patients confirmed as having anaphylaxis in the AD were initially diagnosed with the condition in the ED. Conclusion Of the 528 patients who finally underwent the full allergological study, fewer than half were confirmed as allergic. Moreover, anaphylaxis appears to be underdiagnosed in the ED. Better communication between the ED and the AD is necessary to improve the diagnosis and management of these patients.

Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is characterized by the presence of a nasal Th2 inflammatory response with local production of specific IgE antibodies and a positive response to a nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT) without evidence of systemic atopy. The prevalence has been shown to be up to 25% in subjects affected with rhinitis with persistence, comorbidity and evolution similar to allergic rhinitis. LAR is a consistent entity that does not evolve to allergic rhinitis with systemic atopy over time although patients have significant impairment in quality of life and increase in the severity of nasal symptoms over time. Lower airways can be also involved. The diagnosis of LAR is based mostly on demonstration of positive response to NAPT and/or local synthesis of specific IgE. Allergens involved include seasonal or perennial such as house dusts mites, pollens, animal epithelia, moulds (alternaria) and others. Basophils from peripheral blood may be activated by the involved allergens suggesting the spill over of locally synthesized specific IgE to the circulation. LAR patients will benefit from the same treatment as allergic patients using antihistamines, inhaled corticosteroids and IgE antagonists. Studies on immunotherapy are ongoing and will determine its efficacy in LAR in terms of symptoms improvement and evolution of the natural course of the disease.

Summary Hypersensitivity drug reactions (HDRs) encompass a wide spectrum of unpredictable clinical entities. They represent an important health problem, affecting people of all ages, and lead to a large strain on the public health system. Here, we summarize experiments that use high-throughput genomics technologies to investigate HDRs. We also introduce the field of systems biology as a relatively recent discipline concerned with the integration and analysis of high-throughput data sets such as DNA microarrays and next-generation sequencing data. We describe previous studies that have applied systems biology techniques to related fields such as allergy and asthma. Finally, we present a number of potential applications of systems biology to the study of HDRs, in order to make the reader aware of the types of analyses that can be performed and the insights that can be gained through their application.

Anaphylaxis is an acute, life-threatening, multisystem syndrome resulting from the sudden release of mediators by mast cells and basophils. Although anaphylaxis is often under-communicated and thus underestimated, its incidence appears to have risen over recent decades. Drugs are among the most common triggers in adults, being analgesics and antibiotics the most common causal agents. Anaphylaxis can be caused by immunologic or non-immunologic mechanisms. Immunologic anaphylaxis can be mediated by IgE-dependent or -independent pathways. The former involves activation of Th2 cells and the cross-linking of two or more specific IgE (sIgE) antibodies on the surface of mast cells or basophils. The IgE-independent mechanism can be mediated by IgG, involving the release of platelet-activating factor, and/or complement activation. Non-immunological anaphylaxis can occur through the direct stimulation of mast cell degranulation by some drugs, inducing histamine release and leading to anaphylactic symptoms. Work-up of a suspected drug-induced anaphylaxis should include clinical history; however, this can be unreliable, and skin tests should also be used if available and validated. Drug provocation testing is not recommended due to the risk of inducing a harmful reaction. In vitro testing can help to confirm anaphylaxis by analyzing the release of mediators such as tryptase or histamine by mast cells. When immunologic mechanisms are suspected, serum-sIgE quantification or the use of the basophil activation test can help confirm the culprit drug. In this review, we will discuss multiple aspects of drug-induced anaphylaxis, including epidemiology, mechanisms, and diagnosis.

Background Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most frequent triggers of drug hypersensitivity with NSAIDs-induced urticaria/angioedema (NIUA) the most common phenotype. Loss of hypersensitivity has been reported for IgE-mediated reactions; however, it has not been assessed in nonimmunological reactions such as NIUA. We evaluated NSAID-hypersensitivity over time in NIUA patients. Methods Patients confirmed as NIUA by positive drug provocation test (DPT) with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) during 2005-2012 (V1) were included (n=38). Subjects were prospectively re-evaluated by DPT with ASA/other NSAIDs at two time points between 2013 and 2015 (V2 and V3). Atopy was assessed by skin prick test (SPT) using inhalant and food allergens. Results Patients were evaluated at V1 and re-evaluated after 60 months (V2; IR:48-81) and a further 18 months (V3; IR:14-24). At V2, the majority (24; 63.15%) tolerated ASA and other NSAIDs (Group A) while 14 (36.84%) still reacted (Group B). At V3, all Group A patients remained tolerant; all Group B patients remained hypersensitive. The number of previous episodes reported at V1 and the percentage of reactions induced by ASA/ibuprofen were significantly lower in Group A (P=.005 and P=.006, respectively). Group A patients developed tolerance 72 months (IR:45-87) after their last evaluated reaction (V1); this interval was shorter in nonatopics (P=.003), patients who experienced reactions over 1 hour after NSAIDs administration (P=.001), and those who experienced isolated urticaria after NSAID intake (P=.024). Conclusions NIUA patients may develop tolerance to NSAIDs over time, a process that seems to be influenced by atopy and type of clinical reaction.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the drugs most commonly involved in hypersensitivity drug reactions. Such reactions can be due to the release of inflammatory mediators in the absence of specific immunologic recognition, or immunoglobulin E (IgE)- or T-cell-selective responses. The former include upper and lower airway symptoms in patients with chronic underlying respiratory disease, the exacerbation of chronic spontaneous urticaria, and the induction of cutaneous symptoms. The latter include selective responses to a single NSAID with good tolerance to strong cyclooxygenase-1 inhibitors, with a putative IgE or T-cell mechanism proposed. These reactions can be acute or delayed.

Background Patients can react to amoxicillin (AX) and clavulanic acid (CLV) taken in combination because of selective reactions to either drug. However, scant information exists concerning patients who react simultaneously to both compounds. Objective To analyze the mechanisms involved in 4 patients who developed allergic reactions to AX-CLV administration (3 with immediate IgE-mediated reaction and 1 with nonimmediate T-cell–mediated reaction) and who responded specifically to both AX and CLV. Methods Skin tests with benzylpenicillin (BP), AX, and CLV were done and, if necessary, drug provocation tests with BP/penicillin V, AX, and AX-CLV were carried out. In immediate reactors, serum specific IgE to benzylpenicilloyl and amoxicilloyl was determined by using the CAP-FEIA system (Pharmacia Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden), and basophil activation test to BP, AX, CLV, and AX-CLV was done. In nonimmediate reactors, immunohistochemistry of skin biopsy and analysis of dendritic cell maturation and T-cell–specific response to BP, AX, CLV, and AX-CLV at both acute and resolution phases of the reaction were conducted. Results All patients with immediate reactions (N = 3) had good tolerance to BP and penicillin V. Two cases also had specific IgE to AX and all had a basophil activation test positive to AX, CLV, and AX-CLV. The patient with a nonimmediate reaction exhibited dendritic cell and T-lymphocyte responses specific to both AX and CLV. Finally, the analysis of the cells infiltrating the skin and peripheral blood during the acute phase indicated a T H 1 pattern response. Conclusions Our study provides evidence that reactions to both AX and CLV can appear in the same patient.

Background Reports of selective reactions to clavulanic acid (CLV) have increased in recent decades because of its increased prescription in combination with amoxicillin (AX) as AX-CLV. Basophil activation test (BAT) is used for diagnosing beta-lactam immediate hypersensitivity and is the only available in vitro assay for diagnosing patients with immediate hypersensitivity to CLV. However, few studies, and with limited numbers of patients have been published. Objective The aim of this study was to establish the sensitivity, specificity, and negativization rates of BAT to AX and CLV. Methods We studied 115 patients with immediate allergic reactions after AX-CLV treatment, 57 with selective reactions to AX (group A), 58 with selective reactions to CLV (group B), and 28 tolerant subjects. BAT was performed with AX in group A and with CLV in group B. A 4-year follow-up study was performed in patients with an initial positive BAT result. Results The overall sensitivity of BAT was 55%, specificity 89%, and positive predictive value (PPV) 96%. For group A, sensitivity was 47%, specificity 93%, and PPV 93%; for group B, sensitivity was 62%, specificity 89%, and PPV 92%. Follow-up study showed a faster negativization rate of BAT for group A, with around 40% of patients becoming negative at 12 months in both groups. Conclusions The high PPV of BAT to CLV shows its potential value as a complementary tool to the allergological workup of patients with immediate allergic reactions after AX-CLV treatment. Importantly, the assay should be done within the first 12 months after the reaction to reduce false-negative results.

Evaluate: the in vivo and in vitro responses to nOle e 1 in allergic rhinitis (AR) and local allergic rhinitis (LAR) patients sensitized to olive tree pollen (OL) confirmed by nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT). Methods: Twelve subjects with AR, 12 with LAR, and 12 subjects as control group (CG) were selected. Skin testing and NAPT with nOle e 1 were performed. ECP and tryptase were measured in nasal lavages before and after NAPT. Serum IgE to OL allergens were measured by ELISA. Basophil activation tests (BAT) with OL and nOle e 1 and dendritic cell maturation/proliferation studies were carried out. Results: All AR (12/12) and 10/12 (83%) of LAR had a +NAPT to nOle e 1. ECP levels in nasal lavages were significantly increased after NAPT in both AR and LAR compared with CG at 15 minutes (p

International audience; Quantitation of specific IgE by immunoassay is a recommended in vitro test for the diagnosis of immediate hypersensitivity reactions to betalactams (BLs), particularly when skin test results are negative. IgE antibodies that recognize the common nuclear structure of all BLs or the specific side chain structure can be mainly distinguished by immunoassays. The aim of this study was to develop an immunoassay system to detect IgE antibodies with different specificities. Cellulose discs conjugated with benzylpenicillin (BP), amoxicillin (AX) or both drugs, with poly-l-lysine (PLL) as carrier molecule, were used as solid phases in the radioallergosorbent test (RAST). Direct and inhibition radioimmunoassay studies were made to verify the structures recognized by serum IgE antibodies from penicillin-allergic patients. Our results indicated that the addition of both haptens did not decrease the capacity to capture IgE when serum specific to either BP or AX was used, at least in terms of sensitivity. In addition, the inclusion of two haptens improved significantly the levels of IgE detection in patients who recognized both BP and AX. Therefore, the use of a solid phase with a carrier molecule conjugated with two determinants (AX and BP) is helpful to recognize IgE antibodies against either of these determinants and is useful for screening sera with different specificities.

Background Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is characterized by negative skin testing and serum specific IgE. Diagnosis is based on nasal provocation test (NPT), very sensitive but time-consuming, and/or presence of local synthesis of specific IgE (sIgE) which shows low sensitivity (22%). The aim of the study was to evaluate the presence of specific D. pteronyssinus (DP) activation of basophils by basophil activation test (BAT) in subjects with confirmed LAR. Methods BAT was performed in 43 subjects: 16 with confirmed LAR (positive NPT with DP, negative skin testing and sIgE to DP), 13 with allergic rhinitis (AR)(positive NPT with DP, positive skin testing and sIgE to DP) and 14 healthy controls (negative NPT, negative skin testing and sIgE to DP). To demonstrate a specific IgE mechanism of basophil activation, BAT with wortmannin pre-treatment was performed in four LAR patients. Results BAT with DP was positive in 85% of AR patients and 50% of LAR subjects. BAT showed a substantial correlation with NPT in AR subjects (kappa index: 0.78, p=0.0001). The positive responses of the 4 LAR samples that underwent BAT with wortmannin became negative when this substance was added to the assay. Conclusions

Table of contents Poster walk 11: miscellaneous drug hypersensitivity 2 (P92–P94, P96–P101) P92 16 years of experience with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) Javier Dionicio Elera, Cosmin Boteanu, Maria Aranzazu Jimenez Blanco, Rosario Gonzalez-Mendiola, Irene Carrasco García, Antonio Alvarez, Jose Julio Laguna Martinez P93 Allergy evaluation of quinolone induced adverse reactions Jaume Martí Garrido, Carla Torán Barona, Carolina Perales Chorda, Ramón López Salgueiro, Miguel Díaz Palacios, Dolores Hernández Fernández De Rojas P94 Bupropion-induced acute urticaria and angioedema, a case report Emre Ali Acar, Ayse Aktas, Aylin Türel Ermertcan, Peyker Temiz P96 Delayed type hypersensitivity and study of cross-reactivity between proton-pump inhibitors Chien-Yio Lin, Chung-Yee Rosaline Hui, Ya-Ching Chang, Chih-Hsun Yang, Wen-Hung Chung P97 Diagnostic work-up in suspected hypersensitivity to proton-pump inhibitors: looking at cross-reactivity Fabrícia Carolino, Diana Silva, Eunice Dias De Castro, Josefina R. Cernadas P98 Management of infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions to enzyme replacement therapy for lysosomal diseases Luis Felipe Ensina, Carolina Aranda, Ines Camelo Nunes, Alex Lacerda, Ana Maria Martins, Ekaterini Goudouris, Marcia Ribeiro, José Francisco Da Silva Franco, Leandra Queiroz, Dirceu Solé P99 Management of insulin allergy with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion Ceyda Tunakan Dalgiç, Aytül Zerrin Sin, Fatma Düsünür Günsen, Gökten Bulut, Fatma Ömür Ardeniz, Okan Gülbahar, Emine Nihal Mete Gökmen, Ali Kokuludag P100 Off-label use of icatibant for management of serious angioedema associated with angiotensin inhibitors Ana M. Montoro De Francisco, Talía Mª De Vicente Jiménez, Adriana M. Mendoza Parra, Angella M. Burgos Pimentel, Amelia García Luque P101 Thiocolchicoside anaphylaxis: an unusual suspect? Luis Amaral, Fabricia Carolino, Leonor Carneiro Leão, Eunice Castro, Josefina Cernadas Poster walk 12: betalactam hypersensitivity (P102–P111) P102 A curious delayed reading: a case report of a β-lactam allergy in a child Nicole Pinto, Joana Belo, João Marques, Pedro Carreiro-Martins, Paula Leiria-Pinto P103 Betalactam-induced hypersensitivity: a 10-years’ experience Amel Chaabane, Haifa Ben Romdhane, Nadia Ben Fredj, Zohra Chadly, Naceur A. Boughattas, Karim Aouam P104 Cefazolin hypersensitivity: towards optimized diagnosis Astrid P. Uyttebroek, Chris H. Bridts, Antonino Romano, Didier G. Ebo, Vito Sabato P105 Clavulanic acid allergy: two cases report Anabela Lopes, Joana Cosme, Rita Aguiar, Tatiana Lourenço, Maria-João Paes, Amélia Spínola-Santos, Manuel Pereira-Barbosa P106 Diagnosis of betalactam allergy in an allergy department Cíntia Rito Cruz, Rute Pereira Dos Reis, Elza Tomaz, Ana Paula Pires, Filipe Inácio P107 Diagnostic work-up of 410 patients with suspicion of betalactam antibiotic hypersensitivity Filipe Benito-Garcia, Inês Mota, Magna Correia, Ângela Gaspar, Marta Chambel, Susana Piedade, Mário Morais-Almeida P108 Immediate selective hypersensitivity reactions to clavulanic acid Alla Nakonechna, Yurij Antipkin, Tetiana Umanets, Fernando Pineda, Francisca Arribas, Volodymyr Lapshyn P109 Prevalence and incidence of penicillin hypersensitivity reactions in Colombia Pablo Andrés Miranda, Bautista De La Cruz Hoyos P110 Selective sensitization to amoxicilin and clavulanic acid Jose Julio Laguna Martinez, Aranzazu Jimenez Blanco, Javier Dionicio Elera, Cosmin Boteanu, Rosario Gonzalez-Mendiola, Marta Del Pozo P111 Infliximab-specific T cells are detectable also in treated patients who have not developed anti-drug antibodies Alessandra Vultaggio, Francesca Nencini, Sara Pratesi, Andrea Matucci, Enrico Maggi Poster walk 13: biologicals, local anesthetics, others (P112–P118) P112 A case report of allergic immediate systemic reaction to adalimumab and certolizumab Ceyda Tunakan Dalgiç, Fatma Düsünür Günsen, Gökten Bulut, Fatma Ömür Ardeniz, Okan Gülbahar, Emine Nihal Mete Gökmen, Aytül Zerrin Sin, Ali Kokuludag P113 Allergy to local anesthetics: negative predictive value of skin tests Ivana Cegec, Danica Juricic Nahal, Viktorija Erdeljic Turk, Matea Radacic Aumiler, Ksenija Makar Ausperger, Iva Kraljickovic, Iveta Simic P114 Cutaneous adverse reactions of molecular targeted agents: a retrospective analysis in 150 patients in our department Yukie Yamaguchi, Tomoya Watanabe, Megumi Satoh, Tomohiko Tanegashima, Kayoko Oda, Hidefumi Wada, Michiko Aihara P115 Generalized paralysis induced by local lidocaine injection Jaechun Jason Lee, Jay Chol Choi, Hwa Young Lee P116 Hypersensitivity to local anaesthetics: a 10 year review Rosa-Anita Rodrigues Fernandes, Emília Faria, Joana Pita, Nuno Sousa, Carmelita Ribeiro, Isabel Carrapatoso, Ana Todo Bom P117 Local anaesthetics: a rare culprit in hypersensitivity reactions Ana Rodolfo, Eunice Dias-Castro, Josefina Cernadas P118 Stevens–Johnson syndrome in clinical practice: a variant of clinical course Marina Voronova Poster walk 14: RCM (P119–P128) P119 13 cases of severe anaphylactic reactions due to radiocontrast media Jaume Martí Garrido, Ramon Lopez Salgueiro, Diana Kury Valle, Verónica Pacheco Coronel, Carolina Perales Chordá, Dolores Hernandez Fernandez De Rojas P120 Anaphylactic shock after administration of iodinated contrast medium during cardiac catheterization Roselle Catherine Yu Madamba, Marta Ferrer, Maria Jose Goikoetxea, Carmen D’Amelio, Amalia Bernad, Olga Vega, Gabriel Gastaminza P121 Anaphylactic shock and cardiac arrest induced by gadolinium-based contrast agents Beatriz Pola Bibián, Marina Lluncor Salazar, Gemma Vilà Nadal, Ana María Fiandor Roman, Javier Dominguez Ortega, Miguel Gonzalez Muñoz, Santiago Quirce Gancedo, Maria Rosario Cabañas Moreno P122 Anaphylaxis to gadobenate and cross-reactivity to other gadolinium-based contrast agents in two patients Kathrin Scherer Hofmeier P123 Anaphylaxis to glatiramer acetate in a patient with multiple sclerosis Fabrícia Carolino, Vladyslava Barzylovych, Josefina R. Cernadas P124 Delayed hypersensitivity reaction to radiocontrast media Fabrícia Carolino, Diana Silva, Leonor Leão, Josefina R. Cernadas P125 Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms induced by iodixanol Gemma Vilà-Nadal, Beatriz Pola, Marina Lluncor, Ana Fiandor, Teresa Bellón, Javier Domínguez, Santiago Quirce P126 Electronic consultation support system for radiocontrast media hypersensitivity changes clinician’s behavior Min-Suk Yang, Sun-Sin Kim, Sae-Hoon Kim, Hye-Ryun Kang, Heung-Woo Park, Sang-Heon Cho, Kyung-Up Min, Yoon-Seok Chang P127 Hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media: skin testing and follow-up Danica Juricic Nahal, Ivana Cegec, Viktorija Erdeljic Turk, Iva Kraljickovic, Matea Radacic Aumiler, Ksenija Makar Ausperger, Iveta Simic P128 Would iodine allergy exist? Clémence Delahaye, Jenny Flabbee, Julie Waton, Olivia Bauvin, Annick Barbaud Poster walk 15: MPE/type 4 (P129–P137) P129 Delayed hypersensitivity cutaneous reactions: a case/control study from a tunisian database Karim Aouam, Najah Ben Fadhel, Zohra Chadly, Nadia Ben Fredj, Naceur A. Boughattas, Amel Chaabane P130 Delayed hypersensitivity reactions to cephalosporins: a review of seven cases Joana Cosme, Anabela Lopes, Amélia Spínola-Santos, Manuel Pereira-Barbosa P131 Diclofenac induced allergic contact dermatitis: case series of four patients Sandra Jerkovic Gulin, Anca Chiriac P132 Late-onset maculopapular rash to irbesartan Bárbara Kong Cardoso, Elza Tomaz, Regina Viseu, Filipe Inácio P133 Nonimmediate hypersensitivity reactions to betalactams: a retrospective analysis Ana Moreira, Susana Cadinha, Ana Castro Neves, Patricia Barreira, Daniela Malheiro, J. P. Moreira Da Silva P134 Occupational airborne contact dermatitis to omeprazole Ružica Jurakic-Toncic, Suzana Ljubojevic, Petra Turcic P135 Ornidazole-induced fixed drug eruption confirmed by positive patch test on a residual pigmented lesion Liesbeth Gilissen, Sara Huygens, An Goossens P136 Repeated delayed reaction induced by amoxicillin and amoxicillin clavulanate Inmaculada Andreu, Ramon Lopez-Salgueiro, Alicia Martinez Romero, Pau Gomez Cabezas P137 Systemic photosensitivity from fenofibrate in a patient photo-sensitized to ketoprofen Liesbeth Gilissen, An Goossens Poster walk 16: HLA genetics (P138–P146) P138 A copy number variation in ALOX5 and PTGER1 is associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs induced urticaria and/or angioedema Pedro Ayuso Parejo, Maria Del Carmen Plaza-Serón, Inmaculada Doña, Natalia Blanca López, Carlos Flores, Luisa Galindo, Ana Molina, James Richard Perkins, Jose Antonio Cornejo-García, José Augusto García-Agúndez, Elena García-Martín, Paloma Campo, María Gabriela Canto, Miguel Blanca P139 Association of galectin-3 (LGALS3) single nucleotide polymorphisms with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-induced urticaria/angioedema José Antonio Cornejo-Garcia, Inmaculada Doña, Rosa María Guéant-Rodríguez, Natalia Blanca-López, María Carmen Plaza-Serón, Raquel Jurado-Escobar, Esther Barrionuevo, María Salas, María Luisa Galindo, Gabriela Canto, Miguel Blanca, Jean-Louis Guéant P140 Detection of T cell responses to ticlopidine using peripheral blood mononuclear cells from HLA-A*33:03+ healthy donors Toru Usui, Arun Tailor, Lee Faulkner, John Farrell, Ana Alfirevic, B. Kevin Park, Dean J. Naisbitt P141 Epistasis approaches to identify novel genes potentially involved in NSAIDs hypersensitivity James Richard Perkins, Jose Antonio Cornejo García, Oswaldo Trelles, Inmaculada Doña, Esther Barrionuevo, María Salas, María Auxiliadora Guerrero, Miguel Blanca, Alex Upton P142 Genetic predisposition of cold medicine related SJS/TEN with severe ocular complications Mayumi Ueta, Hiromi Sawai, Chie Sotozono, Katushi Tokunaga, Shigeru Kinoshita P143 HLA-B*13:01 and dapsone induced hypersensitivity in Thai population Chonlaphat Chonlaphat Sukasem, Patompong Satapornpong, Therdpong Tempark, Pawinee Rerknimitr, Kulprapat Pairayayutakul, Jettanong Klaewsongkram P144 HLA-B*15:02 alleles and lamotrigine-induced cutaneous adverse drug reactions in Thai Chonlaphat Sukasem, N. Koomdee, T. Jantararoungtong, S. Santon, A. Puangpetch, U. Intusoma, W. Tassaneeyakul, V. Theeramoke P145 HLA-B*38:01 and HLA-A*24:02 allele frequencies in Spanish patients with lamotrigine-induced SCARs Teresa Bellón, Elena Ramirez, Alberto Manuel Borobia, Hoi Tong, Jose Luis Castañer, Francisco José De Abajo P146 Overrepresentation of a class II HLA haplotype in severe hypersensitivity type I reactions to carboplatin Violeta Régnier Galvao, Rebecca Pavlos, Elizabeth Mckinnon, Kristina Williams, Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel, Alec Redwood, Elizabeth Phillips, Mariana Castells Poster walk 17: in vivo diagnosis + sIgE (P147–P154) P147 Absence of specific Ig-e against beta-lactams 9 months after an allergic reaction to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid Elisa Boni, Marina Russello, Marina Mauro P148 Drug provocation tests in suspected opioid allergy Kok Loong Ue, Krzysztof Rutkowski P149 Improvement to the specific IgE cut-off in the assess of β-lactamic allergy Victor Soriano Gomis, Jorge Frances Ferre, Angel Esteban Rodriguez, Vicente Cantó Reig, Javier Fernandez Sanchez P150 Initial false negative specific IgE to gelatin in a patient with gelatin-induced anaphylaxis Christine Breynaert, Erna Van Hoeyveld, Rik Schrijvers P151 Inmediate reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics: pattern of skin test response over the time Jose Julio Laguna Martinez, Rosario Gonzalez Mendiola, Javier Dionicio Elera, Cosmin Boteanu, Aranzazu Jimenez Blanco, Marta Del Pozo, Raquel Fuentes Irigoyen P152 New fluorescent dendrimeric antigens for the evaluation of dendritic cell maturation as a test to detect allergy reactions to amoxicillin Daniel Collado, Yolanda Vida, Francisco Najera, Ezequiel Perez-Inestrosa, Pablo Mesa-Antunez, Cristobalina Mayorga, María José Torres, Miguel Blanca P153 Positive skin test or positive specific IgE to penicillin does not predict penicillin allergy Line K. Tannert, Charlotte G. Mortz, Per Stahl Skov, Carsten Bindslev-Jensen P154 Significance of skin testing and in vitro-analysis of neuromuscular blocking agents in diagnosis of perioperative drug hypersensitivity: evaluation of a negative control population Wolfgang Pfützner, Hannah Dörnbach, Johanna Visse, Michele Rauber, Christian Möbs Poster walk 18: in vitro/ex vivo (P155–P158, P160–P164) P155 Diagnostic value of the lymphocyte toxicity assay (LTA) and the in vitro platelet toxicity assay (IPTA) for β-lactam allergy Abdelbaset A. Elzagallaai, Lindsey Chow, Awatif M. Abuzgaia, Michael J. Rieder P156 Enzyme linked immunospot assay used in the diagnosis of severe cutaneous adverse reactions to antimicrobials Alec Redwood, Jason Trubiano, Rebecca Pavlos, Emily Woolnough, Kaija Stautins, Christina Cheng, Elizabeth Phillips P157 Evaluation of in vitro diagnostic methods for identifying the culprit drugs in drug hypersensitivity Kenichi Kato, Hiroaki Azukizawa, Takaaki Hanafusa, Ichiro Katayama P158 Ex-vivo expanded skin-infiltrating T cells from severe drug eruptions are reactive with causative drugs: a possible novel method for determination of causative drugs Toshiharu Fujiyama, Hideo Hashizume, Takatsune Umayahara, Taisuke Ito, Yoshiki Tokura P160 In vitro release of IL-2, IL-5 and IL-13 in diagnosis of patients with delayed-type nickel hypersensitivity Mira Silar, Mihaela Zidarn, Helena Rupnik, Peter Korosec P161 Single cell analysis of drug responsive T cells; identification of candidate drug reactive T cell receptors in abacavir and carbamazepine hypersensitivity Alec James Redwood, Kaija Strautins, Katie White, Abha Chopra, Katherine Konvinse, Shay Leary, Rebecca Pavlos, Simon Mallal, Elizabeth Phillips P162 Specificity and sensitivity of LTT in DRESS: analysis of agreement with the Spanish pharmacovigilance system probability algorithm Rosario Cabañas, Elena Ramirez, Ana María Fiandor, Teresa Bellón P163 The role of interleukin-22 in β-lactam hypersensitivity Andrew Sullivan, Paul Whitaker, Daniel Peckham, B. Kevin Park, Dean J. Naisbitt P164 Vancomycin-specific T cell responses and teicoplanin cross-reactivity Wei Yann Haw, Marta E. Polak, Carolann Mcguire, Michael R. Ardern-Jones Poster walk 19: BAT and biomarkers (P165–P173) P165 A combination of early biomarkers useful for the prediction of severe ADRs Yumi Aoyama, Tetsuo Shiohara P166 Basophil activation test in the diagnostic approach of reactions during general anaesthesia Ana Moreira, Susana Cadinha, Patrícia Barreira, Ana Castro Neves, Daniela Malheiro, Sara Correia, J. P. Moreira Da Silva P167 IL-10 can be related to successful desensitization Asli Gelincik, Semra Demir, Fatma Sen, Hamza Ugur Bozbey, Muge Olgac, Derya Unal, Raif Coskun, Bahauddin Colakoglu, Suna Buyuozturk, Esin Çatin-Aktas, Gunnur Deniz P168 Immediate reactions to proton pump inhibitors: value of basophil activation test Maria Salas, Jose Julio Laguna, Esther Barrionuevo, J. Dionicio, Tahia Fernandez, R. Gonzalez-Mendiola, I. Olazabal, Maria Dolores Ruiz, Miguel Blanca, Cristobalina Mayorga, Maria José Torres P169 Improvement of the elevated tryptase criterion to discriminate IgE from non-IgE mediated allergic reactions Gabriel Gastaminza, Alberto Lafuente, Carmen D’Amelio, Amalia Bernad, Olga Vega, Roselle Catherine Madamba, M. Jose Goikoetxea, Marta Ferrer, Jorge Núñez P170 Low expression of Tim-3 could serve as a biomarker for control and diagnose maculopapular exanthema induced by drugs Tahia Diana Fernández, Inmaculada Doña, Francisca Palomares, Rubén Fernández, Maria Salas, Esther Barrionuevo, Maria Isabel Sanchez, Miguel Blanca, Maria José Torres, Cristobalina Mayorga P171 Role of basophil activation test using two different activation markers for the diagnosis of allergy to fluoroquinolones Esther Barrionuevo, Tahía Fernandez, Arturo Ruiz, Adriana Ariza, Maria Salas, Inmaculada Doña, Ana Molina, Miguel Blanca, Maria Jose Torres, Cristobalina Mayorga P172 The importance of basophil activation test in anaphylaxis due to celecoxib Amalia Bernad Alonso, Carmen D’Amelio Garófalo, Olga Vega Matute, Marta Ferrer Puga, María José Goikoetxea Lapresa, Roselle Catherine Yu Madamba, Gabriel Gastaminza Lasarte P173 The role of basophil activation test in the diagnosis of immediate type drug hypersensitivity to betalactam antibiotics Antonia Thinnes, Hans F. Merk, Jens Malte Baron, Martin Leverkus, Galina Balakirski Poster walk 20: TCR recognition, cellular (P174–P183) P174 Characterisation of the effect of co-inhibitory signalling on the activation of drug-derived antigen-specific T-cells Andrew Gibson, Monday Ogese, Lee Faulkner, B. Kevin Park, Dean J. Naisbitt P175 Characterization of drug hapten-specific T cell responses in piperacillin hypersensitive patients Zaid Al-Attar, Fiazia Yaseen, Xiaoli Meng, Rozalind Jenkins, Paul Whitaker, Daniel Peckham, Lee Faulkner, John Farrel, Kevin Park, Dean Naisbitt P176 Characterization of the response of T-cells to telaprevir and its metabolite in normal volunteers Zaid Al-Attar, Khetam Alhilali, Yanni Xue, John Farrell, Lee Faulkner, Kevin Park, Dean Naisbitt P177 Characterization of the T cell receptor signatures of drug-responsive T cells Patricia Illing, Nicole Mifsud, Heidi Fettke, Jeffrey Lai, Rebecca Ho, Patrick Kwan, Anthony Purcell P178 Defining the signals between hepatocytes and immune cells in idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) Monday O. Ogese, Lee Faulkner, B. Kevin Park, Catherine Betts, Dean J. Naisbitt P179 Development of novel chemicals that do not bind to HLA-B*57:01 or activate CD8 + T-cells through modification of the 6-amino cyclopropyl group of abacavir Paul Thomson, John Farrell, Mohammad Alhaidari, Neill Berry, Paul M. O’Neill, B. Kevin Park, Dean J. Naisbitt P180 Generation and characterization of dapsone- and nitroso-dapsone-specific T-cell clones using lymphocytes from healthy volunteers Abdulaziz Alzahrani, Monday O. Ogese, John Farrell, Lee Faulkner, Andrew Gibson, Arun Tailor, B. Kevin Park, Dean J. Naisbitt P181 Identification of benzylpenicillin-hapten peptides responsible for naïve T-cell activation and immunization of allergic patients to penicillin Marie Eliane Azoury, Lucia Fili, Rami Bechara, Noémie Scornet, Cathy Nhim, Richard Weaver, Nancy Claude, Delphine Joseph, Bernard Maillere, Paola Parronchi, Marc Pallardy P182 Massive expansion of clonotypic and polycytotoxic CD8+ T cells in toxic epidermal necrolysis Axel Patrice Villani, Aurore Rozières, Benoît Bensaïd, Mathilde Tardieu, Floriane Albert, Virginie Mutez, Tugba Baysal, Marc Pallardy, Janet Maryanski, Jean-François Nicolas, Osami Kanagawa, Marc Vocanson P183 Pharmaco-immunological synapse of HLA-drug-TCR in SCAR Shuen-Iu Hung Poster walk 21: new in vitro methods, haptens, etc. (P184–P194) P184 Amoxicillin-clavulanate forms distinct multiple haptenic structures on human serum albumin in patients Xiaoli Meng, Arun Tailor, Caroline J. Harrison, Rosalind E. Jenkins, Paul Whitaker, Neil S. French, Dean J. Naisbitt, B. Kevin Park P185 Dendrimeric antigens for studying the influence of penicillin determinants orientation on IgE recognition Maria Isabel Montañez, Cristobalina Mayorga, Francisco Najera, Adriana Ariza, Tahia D. Fernandez, Maria Salas, Angela Martin-Serrano, Miguel Blanca, Ezequiel Perez-Inestrosa, Maria Jose Torres P186 Dendrimeric antigens on solid supports: designed materials for IgE quantification Yolanda Vida, Maria Isabel Montañez, Noemi Molina, Daniel Collado, Francisco Najera, Adriana Ariza, Maria Jose Torres, Cristobalina Mayorga, Ezequiel Perez-Inestrosa P187 Development of a screening assay for drug hypersensitivity using naïve T cells from donors with seven different HLA class I risk alleles Lee Faulkner, Sally Wood, Ana Alfirevic, Munir Pirmohamed, Dean J. Naisbitt, B. Kevin Park P188 Different patterns of recognition of structures derived from amoxicillin by IgE antibodies from patients with immediate hypersensitivity reactions to betalactams Adriana Ariza, Cristobalina Mayorga, María Isabel Montañez, María Salas, Inmaculada Doña, Ángela Martín-Serrano, Ezequiel Pérez-Inestrosa, Dolores Pérez-Sala, Miguel Blanca, Antonio E. Guzmán, María José Torres P189 High-resolution typing of HLA polymorphism and T-cell receptor repertoire for severe adverse drug reactions based on the cost-effective next-generation sequencing approaches Tai-Ming Ko, Yuan-Tsong Chen, Jer-Yuarn Wu P190 Identification and fate of intracellular proteins haptenated by amoxicillin Francisco J. Sánchez-Gómez, Juan M. González-Morena, Yolanda Vida, Ezequiel Pérez-Inestrosa, Miguel Blanca, María J. Torres, Dolores Pérez-Sala P191 In vitro detection of terbinafine protein adducts Arun Tailor, Toru Usui, Yanni Xue, Xiaoli Meng, Dean J. Naisbitt, B. Kevin Park P192 MicroRNAs dysregulation in PBMCs from drug hypersensitivity patients during drug challenge in vitro Alejandra Monroy Arreola, Jesus Agustin Badillo Corona, Silvia Mendez Flores, Judith Dominguez Cherit, Dean J. Naisbitt, Noe Valentin Duran Figueroa, Jose Luis Castrejon Flores P193 NSAIDs-exacerbated cutaneous disease: high throughput gene expression profiling José Antonio Cornejo-García, James Perkins, Natalia Blanca-López, Diana Pérez-Alzate, Raquel Jurado-Escobar, Inmaculada Doña, Gador Bogas, María J. Torres, Gabriela Canto, Miguel Blanca P194 Utility of skin tests in non-immediate reactions to amoxicillin Luis Mario Tubella Marti, Fernando Pineda De La Losa, Francisca Arribas Poves, Jaime Tubella Lopez, Teodora Lopez Santiago