Search

Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) have a high prevalence of RBC alloimmunization. However, underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Given that proinflammatory type 1 interferons (IFNα/β) and interferon stimulated genes (ISGs) promote alloimmunization in mice, we hypothesized that IFNα/β may contribute to the increased frequency of alloimmunization in patients with SCD. To investigate this, expression of ISGs in blood leukocytes and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of previously transfused SCD patients with or without alloimmunization and race-matched healthy controls were quantified, and IFNα/β gene scores were calculated. IFNα/β gene scores of SCD leukocytes and plasma cytokines were elevated, compared to controls (gene score, p < 0.01). Upon stimulation with IFNβ, isolated PBMCs from patients with SCD had elevated ISGs and IFNα/β gene scores (p < 0.05), compared to stimulated PBMCs from controls. However, IFNβ-stimulated and unstimulated ISG expression did not significantly differ between alloimmunized and non-alloimmunized patients. These findings indicate that patients with SCD express an IFNα/β gene signature, and larger studies are needed to fully determine its role in alloimmunization. Further, illustration of altered IFNα/β responses in SCD has potential implications for IFNα/β-mediated viral immunity, responses to IFNα/β-based therapies, and other sequelae of SCD.

Background COVID‐19 convalescent plasma (CCP) is plasma collected from individuals who have recovered from SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. The FDA Emergency Use Authorization restricts use of CCP to high‐titer units only. The purpose of this study was to determine if donor ABO blood group was associated with SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody response, and subsequent qualification as high‐titer CCP. Methods All CCP donations collected from April 21, 2020 to September 1, 2020 were included. The Abbott ARCHITECT semi‐quantitative chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay was used to assess IgG antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein of SARS‐CoV‐2. Units with a S/C value ≥4.5 were considered high titer. Results A total of 232 CCP donations were evaluated. There were no significant differences in the distribution of sex, age, and interval from symptom resolution to donation by ABO blood group. The mean SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG antibody S/C value was significantly lower in blood group O donations (3.6), compared to blood group A (5.0) donations (p

BACKGROUND Despite West Nile virus (WNV) blood donation screening using nucleic acid testing (NAT), donors with low viral loads not detected by mini-pool-NAT have led to transfusion transmitted (TT)-WNV infection. We describe a probable case of fatal TT-WNV infection from an individual donor (ID)-NAT non-reactive apheresis platelet donation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS An apheresis platelet donation was WNV ID-NAT reactive and prior donations from the same donor were investigated. A WNV ID-NAT non-reactive apheresis platelet unit collected 26 days earlier was transfused during heart transplantation to a patient who subsequently developed WNV neuroinvasive disease and expired. The source of the recipient's WNV infection was investigated. RESULTS Twenty-six days after collection of the suspect platelet unit, a donation from the same donor was WNV ID-NAT reactive and WNV IgM and IgG positive. In addition to the suspect platelet unit, the heart transplant recipient who developed WNV infection received 17 blood components from 24 donors. Serologic testing performed on 11 of the remaining 24 donors (46%) was WNV IgM negative. Pre-transplant recipient and heart donor samples tested WNV RNA and IgM negative. CONCLUSION A probable case of fatal neuroinvasive TT-WNV was linked to an infectious apheresis platelet unit undetected by WNV ID-NAT. It is hypothesized that the suspect unit was collected early in the viremic period when viral RNA was below the limit-of-detection of the ID-NAT assay. Implementation of ID-NAT screening of blood donors has not entirely eliminated the risk of TT-WNV infections, which may best be addressed by pathogen inactivation technologies.

BACKGROUND The microparticle content (MP%) of apheresis platelets-a marker of platelet activation-is influenced by donor factors and by external stressors during collection and storage. This study assessed the impact of apheresis technology and other factors on the activation status (MP%) of single-donor apheresis platelets. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Data from six US hospitals that screened platelets by measuring MP% through dynamic light scattering (ThromboLUX) were retrospectively analyzed. Relative risks (RRs) were derived from univariate and multivariable regression models, with activation rate (MP% ≥15% for plasma-stored platelets; ≥10% for platelet additive solution [PAS]-stored platelets) and MP% as outcomes. Apheresis platform (Trima Accel vs Amicus), storage medium (plasma vs PAS), pathogen reduction, storage time, and testing location were used as predictors. RESULTS Data were obtained from 7511 platelet units collected using Trima (from 16 suppliers, all stored in plasma, 20.0% were pathogen-reduced) and 2456 collected using Amicus (from four different collection facilities of one supplier, 65.0% plasma-stored, 35.0% PAS-stored, none pathogen-reduced). Overall, 30.0% of Trima platelets were activated compared to 45.6% of Amicus platelets (P

Background Serologic RhD-negative blood donors are tested by a method known to detect weak D antigen expression. Serology does not detect all red blood cells with RhD expression and RHD genotyping has been used to identify variant RHD alleles, which may lead to some RhD expression. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of RHD variant alleles in serologic RhD-negative blood donors at a hospital-based donor center in Los Angeles. Study design and methods RHD genotyping of serologic RhD-negative blood donors over a 20-month period was performed using the Immucor RHD BeadChip assay. DNA sequencing was performed when the RHD BeadChip assay failed to assign a genotype. For RHD variants known or suspected to result in RhD expression, recipients of previous blood donations were investigated for alloimmunization. Results RHD genotyping was performed in 1174 RhD-negative blood donors, and 1122 were genotyped for RHCE variants. Eleven donors (0.94%) harbored mutations predicted to yield RhD expression. The predicted phenotypes were, in decreasing frequency, DEL, partial, and weak D phenotypes. Anti-D was not detected in 16 patients who had received blood from these donors after an average follow up of 182 days. Conclusion Genotyping can be used to identify donors with the potential to sensitize RhD-negative recipients. In this limited study, 0.94% of serologic RhD-negative blood donors were found to have variant RHD alleles that might cause alloimmunization in RhD-negative recipients. To our knowledge, a study of this nature has not been reported in the United States.