Search

The publication of new standards for terminology and labeling marks an important step in ensuring consistency and traceability of cellular therapies at the global level. However, it is only with the widespread implementation of the standard that the benefits can be truly realized. This paper provides guidance on the practical aspects of adopting these new standards for organizations with differing current levels of computerization. It discusses project management, equipment, licensing, and validation topics. J. Clin. Apheresis, 2007. © 2007 Internal Cellular Therapy Coding and Labeling Advisory Group.

Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is an important source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation. Although UCB is often collected from unrelated donors, directed umbilical cord blood (DCB) from sibling donors also provides an important source of UCB for transplantation. This report summarizes the experience in collection, testing, storage, and transplantation of DCB units by the National Blood Service for England and North Wales over 10 years. Eligibility for collection was based on an existing sibling suffering from a disease that may be treated by stem cell transplantation or a family history that could result in the birth of a sibling with a disease that could be treated by stem cell transplantation. Collections were made on the provision that the sibling's clinician was willing to financially support the collection and to take responsibility for medical review of the mother and potential recipient. Given the high investment in UCB banking and the introduction of new regulations and mandatory licensing under the European Union Tissues and Cells Directive and those proposed in the U.S., this report details the procedures that we have used for DCB donations, the outcome data where donations have been used for transplantation, and it provides some timely recommendations for best practices. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

Disparity for HLA in unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation (BMT) increases the risk of graft rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and may compromise transplant outcome. We have compared the outcome of matched and mismatched transplants from unrelated donors in 137 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Their disease status was complete remission (CR)-1, 24 patients; CR-2, 88 patients; CR-3, 18 patients; CR-4, 2 patients; and relapse, 5 patients. CAMPATH monoclonal antibodies were used for T-cell depletion and cyclosporin A was given to 134 children together with short-course methotrexate in 43, mainly when there was HLA disparity. Fifty-two donor/recipient pairs were HLA-mismatched, 41 at HLA-A and -B and 11 at HLA-DR and -DQ loci. Overall graft failure was increased in recipients of marrow mismatched at either HLA-A, -B, -DR, or -DQ (15.7% v 4.8%; P = .057) mainly because there was a higher proportion of children with primary graft failure (11.8% v 1.2%; P = .012). The presence of an HLA-C locus mismatch did not independently increase the likelihood of graft failure. There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute GVHD ≥ grade 2 between the matched and mismatched groups (P = .849). For patients in CR-2, the risk of relapse post-BMT was significantly lower if leukemic relapse occurred off-treatment (P = .005). The Kaplan-Meier overall and leukemia-free survival (LFS) estimates for recipients of matched and mismatched BMT, respectively, at 36 months were 49% versus 42% (P = .380) and 45% versus 40% (P = .654). Although HLA mismatching results in an increased occurrence of primary graft failure with T-cell–depleted allografts, it allows more donors to be identified rapidly for children with ALL without compromising overall transplant outcome.

The efficacy of allografting in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is heavily influenced by remission status at the time of transplant. Using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based minimal residual disease (MRD) analysis, we have investigated retrospectively the impact of submicroscopic leukemia on outcome in 64 patients receiving allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for childhood ALL. Remission BM specimens were taken 6 to 81 days (median, 23) before transplant. All patients received similar conditioning therapy; 50 received grafts from unrelated donors and 14 from related donors. Nineteen patients were transplanted in first complete remission (CR1) and 45 in second or subsequent CR. MRD was analyzed by PCR of Ig or T-cell receptor δ or γ rearrangements, electrophoresis, and allele-specific oligoprobing. Samples were rated high-level positive (clonal band evident after electrophoresis; sensitivity 10−2 to 10−3), low-level positive (MRD detected only after oligoprobing; sensitivity 10−3 to 10−5), or negative. Excluding 8 patients transplanted in CR2 for isolated extramedullary relapse (all MRD−), MRD was detected at high level in 12 patients, low level in 11, and was undetectable in 33. Two-year event-free survival for these groups was 0%, 36%, and 73%, respectively (P < .001). Follow-up in patients remaining in continuing remission is 20 to 96 months (median, 35). These results suggest that MRD analysis could be used routinely in this setting. This would allow identification of patients with resistant leukemia (who may benefit from innovative BMT protocols) and of those with more responsive disease (who may be candidates for randomized trials of BMT versus modern intensive relapse chemotherapy).

T hese standards have been developed through the co-operative endeavor of the following organizations: AABB, American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT), American Society for Apheresis (ASFA), European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy (FACT), ICCBBA, International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT), International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT), ISCT Europe, Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE), National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), and the World Marrow Donor Association (WMDA). The use of standard terminology will help to ensure a common understanding of product definitions. The labeling standard, supported by the ISBT 128 information system, will ensure unique global identification of cellular therapy products, an international reference table for product descriptions, and label design that is consistent worldwide. The organizations supporting these standards believe that their adoption will significantly improve the quality, safety, and traceability of cellular therapy products. In developing the terminology standard the Advisory Group recognized that the frequent movement of cellular therapy products between countries (and continents) required a consistent use of terminology between ISBT 128 and other published standards (e.g., Circular of Information, AABB, FACT, JACIE, Netcord). The Advisory Group has attempted to achieve these aims by removing complexity and redundancy from the coding system wherever possible and, by wide consultation, agreeing to terminology acceptable to all for inclusion in future publication of their standards and guidance. TERMINOLOGY STANDARD

An advantage of CD34+ cell selection over antibody purging is that a component allograft is produced comprising a stem cell enriched and an unadsorbed fraction, the latter containing T cells which may be used for post-transplant immunotherapy. Initial reports with PBSC allografts suggested that T cell depletion (TCD) by CD34+ cell selection and post-graft cyclosporin A +/- methotrexate was insufficient prophylaxis against acute GVHD. We compared sequential TCD (of a CD34+ cell-selected fraction) using a second (CD2) immunoaffinity step or Campath-1M monoclonal antibody and complement. Since a high stem cell 'dose' enhances engraftment across HLA barriers and improves overall post-transplant outcome, the recovery of CD34+ cells and progenitors were assessed. Sequential positive (CD34+) and negative (CD2+) immunoaffinity selection resulted in a 3.4 log depletion of T cells as compared to a 4.05 log depletion when CD34+ cell selection was followed by Campath-1M treatment. Recoveries of CD34+ cells, CFU-GM and BFU-E following double depletion using CD34+ cell selection plus CD2+ cell depletion were 28, 25 and 17% as compared to 20, 18 and 16% when CD34+ cells were treated with Campath-1M. The unadsorbed fraction contained 85% of the original T cells, from which donor leukocyte infusions in the range of 10(5) to 10(7) CD3+ cells per kg body weight of the recipient were harvested. Despite the advantages of component allografts, the loss of stem/progenitor cells may restrict sequential TCD steps unless single BM harvests are supplemented and/or replaced with mobilised PBSCs.