Search

Aims: Recently, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low (i.e. HER2 score 1+ or 2+ without amplification) breast cancer patients became eligible for trastuzumab-deruxtecan treatment. To improve assay standardisation and detection of HER2-low in a quantitative manner, we conducted an external quality assessment-like study in the Netherlands. Dynamic range cell lines and immunohistochemistry (IHC) calibrators were used to quantify HER2 expression and to assess interlaboratory variability., Methods and Results: Three blank slides with a dynamic range cell line and an IHC calibrator were stained with routine HER2 assays by 35 laboratories. Four different antibody clones were used: 19 (54.3%) 4B5, six (17.1%) A0485, five (14.3%) DG44 (HercepTest) and five (14.3%) SP3. Laboratories used two different detection kits for 4B5 assays: 14 (73.7%) ultraView and five (26.3%) OptiView. Variability of HER2 expression in cell lines, measured with artificial intelligence software, was median (min-max) = negative core 0.5% (0.0-57.0), 1+ core 4.3% (1.6-71.3), 2+ core 42.8% (30.4-92.6) and 3+ core 96.2% (91.8-98.8). The calibrators DG44 and 4B5 OptiView had the highest analytical sensitivity, closely followed by 4B5 ultraView. SP3 was the least sensitive. Calibrators of A0485 assays were not analysable due to background staining., Conclusions: As assays were validated for detecting HER2-amplified tumours, not all assays and antibodies proved suitable for HER2-low detection. Some tests showed distinct expression in the negative cell line. Dynamic range cell line controls and quantitative analysis using calibrators demonstrated more interlaboratory variability than commonly appreciated. Revalidation of HER2 tests by laboratories is needed to ensure clinical applicable HER2-low assays., (© 2024 The Author(s). Histopathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched breast cancer benefits significantly from anti-HER2 targeted therapies. This highlights the critical need for precise HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) interpretation serving as a triage tool for selecting patients for anti-HER2 regimens. Recently, the emerging eligibility of patients with HER2-low breast cancers for a novel HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (T-DXd) adds challenges to HER2 IHC scoring interpretation, notably in the 0-1+ range, which shows high interobserver and interlaboratory staining platform variability. In this review, we navigate evolving challenges and suggest practical recommendations for HER2 IHC interpretation., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aims: Over 50% of breast cancer cases are "Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low breast cancer (BC)", characterized by HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) scores of 1+ or 2+ alongside no amplification on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing. The development of new anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for treating HER2-low breast cancers illustrates the importance of accurately assessing HER2 status, particularly HER2-low breast cancer. In this study we evaluated the performance of a deep-learning (DL) model for the assessment of HER2, including an assessment of the causes of discordances of HER2-Null between a pathologist and the DL model. We specifically focussed on aligning the DL model rules with the ASCO/CAP guidelines, including stained cells' staining intensity and completeness of membrane staining., Methods and Results: We trained a DL model on a multicentric cohort of breast cancer cases with HER2-IHC scores (n = 299). The model was validated on two independent multicentric validation cohorts (n = 369 and n = 92), with all cases reviewed by three senior breast pathologists. All cases underwent a thorough review by three senior breast pathologists, with the ground truth determined by a majority consensus on the final HER2 score among the pathologists. In total, 760 breast cancer cases were utilized throughout the training and validation phases of the study. The model's concordance with the ground truth (ICC = 0.77 [0.68-0.83]; Fisher P = 1.32e-10) is higher than the average agreement among the three senior pathologists (ICC = 0.45 [0.17-0.65]; Fisher P = 2e-3). In the two validation cohorts, the DL model identifies 95% [93% - 98%] and 97% [91% - 100%] of HER2-low and HER2-positive tumours, respectively. Discordant results were characterized by morphological features such as extended fibrosis, a high number of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, and necrosis, whilst some artefacts such as nonspecific background cytoplasmic stain in the cytoplasm of tumour cells also cause discrepancy., Conclusion: Deep learning can support pathologists' interpretation of difficult HER2-low cases. Morphological variables and some specific artefacts can cause discrepant HER2-scores between the pathologist and the DL model., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: There are limited data on the role of multigene tests and their correlation with immunohistochemistry (IHC), especially on core biopsy. MammaTyper is a quantitative conformite Europeeanne (CE) marked, National Institute for Health and Care excellence (NICE) approved, in in vitro diagnostic quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) test for assessment of mRNA expression of four biomarkers (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, MKI67)., Methods: We evaluated the concordance of MammaTyper with oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, and Ki67 by IHC on 133 core needle biopsies of breast cancer. HER2 was positive if IHC 3+ or 2+ and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-amplified. Global and hotspot Ki67 expression was analysed using a cutoff of ≥20% assessed manually and by digital image analysis. Agreements were expressed as overall percent agreement (OPA), positive percent agreement (PPA), negative percent agreement (NPA), and Cohen's kappa., Results: RT-qPCR results of ESR1 were highly concordant with IHC with OPA of 94.7% using 1% cutoff and 91.7% when the low ER-positive category was included. The PPA and NPA between RT-qPCR and IHC for PR was 91.5% and 88.0%, respectively, when using the 1% cutoff. For ERBB2/HER2, the OPA was 95% and the PPA was 84.6%. 40 of 72 HER2 IHC score 0 tumours were classified as ERBB2 low. Best concordance between MKI67 by MammaTyper and Ki67 IHC was achieved using hotspot digital image analysis (OPA: 87.2%, PPA: 90.6%, NPA: 80%)., Conclusion: RT-qPCR-based assessment of the mRNA expression of ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKI67 showed high concordance with IHC, suggesting that the MammaTyper test on core needle biopsies represents a reliable, efficient, and reproducible alternative for breast cancer classification and refining HER2 low categorisation., (© 2024 The Authors. Histopathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( HER2 ) gene amplification and subsequent protein overexpression is a strong prognostic and predictive biomarker in invasive breast carcinoma (IBC). ASCO/CAP recommended tests for HER2 assessment include immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or in situ hybridization (ISH). Accurate HER2 IHC scoring (0, 1+, 2+, 3+) is key for appropriate classification and treatment of IBC. HER2-targeted therapies, including anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies and antibody drug conjugates (ADC), have revolutionized the treatment of HER2-positive IBC. Recently, ADC have also been approved for treatment of HER2-low (IHC 1+, IHC 2+/ISH-) advanced breast carcinoma, making a distinction between IHC 0 and 1+ crucial. In this focused study, 32 IBC with HER2 IHC scores from 0 to 3+ and HER2 FISH results formed a calibration dataset, and 77 IBC with HER2 IHC score 2+ and paired FISH results (27 amplified, 50 non-amplified) formed a validation dataset. H&E and HER2 IHC whole slide images (WSI) were scanned. Regions of interest were manually annotated and IHC scores generated by the software QuantCenter (MembraneQuant application) by 3DHISTECH Ltd. (Budapest, Hungary) and compared to the microscopic IHC score. H-scores [(3×%IHC3+) +(2×%IHC2+) +(1×%IHC1+)] were calculated for semi-automated (MembraneQuant) analysis. Concordance between microscopic IHC scoring and 3DHISTECH MembraneQuant semi-automated scoring in the calibration dataset showed a Kappa value of 0.77 (standard error 0.09). Microscopic IHC and MembraneQuant image analysis for the detection of HER2 amplification yielded a sensitivity of 100% for both and a specificity of 56% and 61%, respectively. In the validation set of IHC 2+ cases, only 13 of 77 cases (17%) had discordant results between microscopic and MembraneQuant images, and various artifacts limiting the interpretation of HER2 IHC, including cytoplasmic/granular staining and crush artifact were noted. Semi-automated analysis using WSI and microscopic evaluation yielded similar HER2 IHC scores, demonstrating the potential utility of this tool for interpretation in clinical practice and subsequent accurate treatment. In this study, it was shown that semi-automatic HER2 IHC interpretation provides an objective approach to a test known to be quite subjective., Competing Interests: FP is a member of the scientific advisory board of Multiplex DX. In addition, FP serves on the diagnostic advisory board and reports receiving consultancy fees from AstraZeneca. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Liao, Bakoglu, Cesmecioglu, Hanna, Pareja, Wen, D’Alfonso, Brogi, Yagi and Ross.)

Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer has emerged as a new subtype of tumor, for which novel antibody-drug conjugates have shown beneficial effects. Assessment of HER2 requires several immunohistochemistry tests with an additional in situ hybridization test if a case is classified as HER2 2+. Therefore, novel cost-effective methods to speed up the HER2 assessment are highly desirable., Methods: We used a self-supervised attention-based weakly supervised method to predict HER2-low directly from 1437 histopathological images from 1351 breast cancer patients. We built six distinct models to explore the ability of classifiers to distinguish between the HER2-negative, HER2-low, and HER2-high classes in different scenarios. The attention-based model was used to comprehend the decision-making process aimed at relevant tissue regions., Results: Our results indicate that the effectiveness of classification models hinges on the consistency and dependability of assay-based tests for HER2, as the outcomes from these tests are utilized as the baseline truth for training our models. Through the use of explainable AI, we reveal histologic patterns associated with the HER2 subtypes., Conclusion: Our findings offer a demonstration of how deep learning technologies can be applied to identify HER2 subgroup statuses, potentially enriching the toolkit available for clinical decision-making in oncology., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The DESTINY Breast-04 trial revealed survival advantages of trastuzumab deruxtecan for women with metastatic HER2-low breast cancer (1+ or 2+ immunohistochemistry [IHC], without amplification). Although this trial applied the 2018 Americal Society of Clinial Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) HER2 IHC scoring criteria, the subjectivity and imprecision in IHC scoring have raised concerns that patients' treatment may be misaligned. Our group of 9 experienced breast pathologists collated a deidentified set of 60 breast cancer core biopsies from 3 laboratories, evaluated with the Ventana 4B5 HER2 assay and mostly scored locally as HER2 0 or 1+. Based on ASCO/CAP 2018 criteria and our extensive experience of reporting HER2 IHC, we specified scoring conventions for cancers with low levels of HER2 protein expression, articulating specific scoring pitfalls. Each pathologist then reviewed digitized whole slide images of the IHC slides and scored the HER2 expression for each case. At a subsequent consensus workshop, we reviewed the cases jointly to establish consensus scores for each case and determine the percentage of HER2 expressing tumor cells. Consensus was reached on all cases, with 40 classified as 1+ and 3 as 2+ (not amplified), totaling 43 (71.7%) HER2-low cancers. The remaining cases were HER2 0. In 93.3% of cases (56/60), the consensus score matched with the majority opinion of pathologists' independent scores. Seven (41.2%) of the 17 cases reported locally as HER2 0 were classified as HER2 low. Conversely, among 32 cases with local scores of 1+, 7 (21.8%) were reclassified as ultralow or null. Individual pathologists' accuracy in matching the consensus scores ranged from 73.3% to 91.67% (mean, 80.74%). Among HER2-low cancers those in which <20% of the tumor cells expressed HER2 had the lowest concordance levels. Observers Cohen's κ coefficients for concordance were excellent for 4, good in 1, and moderate in the 4 observers. This reference set of cases with expert consensus HER2 scores will be invaluable for peer training and development of our national external quality assurance program for HER2-low cancers. For assessing breast cancers at the low end of HER2 protein expression, our targeted scoring criteria and explicit instruction on pitfalls improved pathologists' accuracy and concordance., (Copyright © 2024 United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology. All rights reserved.)

Breast cancer (BC) with average human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) signals/cell ≥6 and HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) ratio <2 (in situ hybridization [ISH] group 3) is very rare, accounting for 0.4% to 3.0% of cases sent for the dual-probe ISH assay. Although such patients are currently eligible for treatment with HER2-targeted therapy, their characteristics and outcomes remain poorly understood. Sixty-two BCs with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemical score (2+) and reflex ISH group 3 results were identified across 4 institutions. Available clinicopathologic characteristics, MammaPrint and BluePrint molecular results, and follow-up information were retrospectively analyzed. Most BCs with HER2 equivocal immunohistochemical and ISH group 3 results were histologic grade 2 or 3 (100%), estrogen receptor (ER) positive (90.3%), with an average HER2 signals/cell of 7.3. Molecular profiles revealed that 80% (16/20) of tumors were luminal subtypes, and HER2 molecular subtype was identified in 10% of tumors (2/20). Twelve (19.4%) out of 62 patients developed local recurrence and/or distant metastasis with a median follow-up of 50 months. One (10%) of 10 patients achieved pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Forty-nine (79%) out of 62 patients completed anti-HER2 agents, and exploratory analysis showed no statistically significant difference in disease outcomes between patients who completed anti-HER2 treatment and those who did not. Univariate analysis revealed advanced clinical stage, and ER/progesterone receptor negativity was associated with unfavorable disease outcomes, and exploratory multivariate analysis demonstrated that clinical stage was the most significant factor associated with disease outcomes in the studied population. These findings increase our understanding of this rare, but clinically important HER2 category. Large-scale prospective randomized studies are needed to further evaluate the role of perioperative HER2-targeted therapy in this patient population., (Copyright © 2024 United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Accurate assessment of HER2 expression in tumor tissue is crucial for determining HER2-targeted treatment options. Nevertheless, pathologists' assessments of HER2 status are less objective than automated, computer-based evaluations. Artificial Intelligence (AI) promises enhanced accuracy and reproducibility in HER2 interpretation. This study aimed to systematically evaluate current AI algorithms for HER2 immunohistochemical diagnosis, offering insights to guide the development of more adaptable algorithms in response to evolving HER2 assessment practices. A comprehensive data search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was conducted using a combination of subject terms and free text. A total of 4994 computational pathology articles published from inception to September 2023 identifying HER2 expression in breast cancer were retrieved. After applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, seven studies were selected. These seven studies comprised 6867 HER2 identification tasks, with two studies employing the HER2-CONNECT algorithm, two using the CNN algorithm, one with the multi-class logistic regression algorithm, and two using the HER2 4B5 algorithm. AI's sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing HER2 0/1+ were 0.98 [0.92-0.99] and 0.92 [0.80-0.97] respectively. For distinguishing HER2 2+, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.78 [0.50-0.92] and 0.98 [0.93-0.99], respectively. For HER2 3+ distinction, AI exhibited a sensitivity of 0.99 [0.98-1.00] and specificity of 0.99 [0.97-1.00]. Furthermore, due to the lack of HER2-targeted therapies for HER2-negative patients in the past, pathologists may have neglected to distinguish between HER2 0 and 1+, leaving room for improvement in the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) in this differentiation. AI excels in automating the assessment of HER2 immunohistochemistry, showing promising results despite slight variations in performance across different HER2 status. While incorporating AI algorithms into the pathology workflow for HER2 assessment poses challenges in standardization, application patterns, and ethical considerations, ongoing advancements suggest its potential as a widely effective tool for pathologists in clinical practice in the near future., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: In colorectal cancer (CRC), HER2 targeting is a promising treatment and immune infiltrate is an important area of research and strategy. Data regarding HER2 status and immune infiltrate are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the immune infiltrate between HER2 amplified and non-amplified categories in proficient MisMatchRepair (pMMR)/microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC., Methods: HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization were performed in a retrospective series of 654 CRC. Lymphocyte infiltrate was analysed by anti-CD3, CD8 and CD4 IHC and evaluated digitally using QuPath software., Results: Among the 654 CRC, we first observed a decreased CD3+ and CD8+ infiltrate between HER2 amplified (all IHC 3+ except one 2+) and non-amplified HER2 2+ IHC CRC (p = 0.059 and 0.072 respectively). A supplementary analysis of 258 pMMR/MSS CRC from the previous cohort, displaying all the IHC scores (0, 1+, 2+, 3+), showed a lower CD3+ infiltrate between HER2 amplified versus HER2 0 (p = 0.002), 1+ (p = 0.088) and non-amplified 2+ (p = 0.081) IHC cases., Conclusions: Our original findings suggest that in pMMR/MSS CRC, the immune infiltrate is reduced in HER2 amplified versus other HER2 categories. These data might be useful for future strategies combining anti-HER2 treatments and immune checkpoint inhibitors and need to be confirmed in larger CRC cohorts., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Chloé Molimard, Fanny Dor, Alexis Overs, Franck Monnien, Grégoire Gessain, Loïs Kedochim, Flavia D'Angelo, Marine Abad, Morgane Heberle, Valentin Derangère, François Ghiringhelli, Lucine Vuitton, Séverine Valmary-Degano, Christophe Borg, Zaher Lakkis, Frédéric Bibeau have no competing financial interests of personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Objectives: We assessed the interobserver and interantibody reproducibility of HER2 immunohistochemical scoring in an enriched HER2-low-expressing breast cancer cohort., Methods: A total of 114 breast cancer specimens were stained by HercepTest (Agilent Dako) and PATHWAY anti-HER2 (4B5) (Ventana) antibody assays and scored by 6 breast pathologists independently using current HER2 guidelines. Level of agreement was evaluated by Cohen κ analysis., Results: Although the interobserver agreement rate for both antibodies achieved substantial agreement, the average rate of agreement for HercepTest was significantly higher than that for the 4B5 clone (74.3% vs 65.1%; P = .002). The overall interantibody agreement rate between the 2 antibodies was 57.8%. Complete interobserver concordance was achieved in 44.7% of cases by HercepTest and 45.6% of cases by 4B5. Absolute agreement rates increased from HER2 0-1+ cases (78.1% by HercepTest and 72.2% by 4B5; moderate agreement) to 2-3+ cases (91.9% by HercepTest and 86.3% by 4B5; almost perfect agreement)., Conclusions: Our results demonstrated notable interobserver and interantibody variation on evaluating HER2 immunohistochemistry, especially in cases with scores of 0-1+, although the performance was much more improved among breast-specialized pathologists with the awareness of HER2-low concept. More accurate and reproducible methods are needed for selecting patients who may benefit from the newly approved HER2-targeting agent on HER2-low breast cancers., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pathology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) amplification and/or overexpression occurs in 12% to 25% of breast cancers. Accurate detection of HER2 is critical in predicting response to HER2-targeted therapy. Both immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) are FDA-approved methods for detecting HER2 status because its protein overexpression is largely attributable to gene amplification. However, variable discordant results between IHC and ISH have been reported., Methods: We determined the frequency of HER2 IHC/ISH discordance in these patients and also performed a pooled literature review analysis., Results: Of the 1125 consecutive primary or metastatic breast cancers with HER2 IHC and ISH performed simultaneously between 2015 and 2020, 84.6% had an unequivocal HER2 status. Discordance was found in 30 cases from 26 patients, including 13 IHC - /ISH + and 17 IHC + /ISH - , representing 1.6% and 11.9% of IHC - and IHC + cases, respectively. Review of the literature between 2001 and 2020 identified 46 relevant studies, with a total of 43,468 cases with IHC and ISH performed. The IHC - /ISH+ and IHC + /ISH - discordances were seen in all antibody clones and ISH methods used. The IHC + /ISH - discordance was significantly higher than IHC - /ISH + (13.8% vs. 3%, P < .0001). The overall discordance constituted 4% of all cases and 5.4% of those with an unequivocal IHC status. Significantly lower incongruities for both IHC - /ISH + and IHC + /ISH - were found in those published after 2018. The discordances probably reflect altered biology of HER2 oncogene/oncoprotein. Routinely performing both IHC and ISH may uncover such cases to prevent denial of potentially beneficial targeted therapy., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: We investigated the impact of our laboratory's reflex testing process for resolving ERBB2 (HER2) status on breast cancer samples that require additional workup after fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), per guideline recommendations published in 2018 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP)., Methods: In total, 500 breast cancer specimens with ERBB2 FISH results in groups 2 through 4 (all reported as immunohistochemistry [IHC] equivocal [2+] at external laboratories) were resubmitted for IHC testing in our laboratory. Per the ASCO/CAP guideline, FISH was rescored when internal IHC was also equivocal (2+), targeted to tumor areas demonstrating more intense IHC staining, if observed., Results: Reflex IHC/FISH testing changed the final reported ERBB2 status in 185 of 500 (37.0%) samples. Result changes included discordant IHC (n = 4 score 0, n = 132 score 1+, and n = 16 score 3+) and discordant FISH (n = 33). Numerical differences in FISH scores were comparable for targeted vs nontargeted FISH rescoring (P = .086 for ERBB2 copy number; P = .49 for ERBB2 ratio). Two cases showed larger differences in FISH scores, suggesting heterogeneity., Conclusions: Retesting of breast cancer samples with equivocal IHC frequently changes IHC results, but targeted reanalysis of borderline FISH results rarely identifies significant differences in ERBB2 copy number or ratio., (© American Society for Clinical Pathology, 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The level of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) protein and gene expression in breast cancer is an essential factor in judging the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Several investigations have shown high intraobserver and interobserver variability in the evaluation of HER2 staining by visual examination. In this study, we aim to propose an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted microscope to improve the HER2 assessment accuracy and reliability. Our AI-assisted microscope was equipped with a conventional microscope with a cell-level classification-based HER2 scoring algorithm and an augmented reality module to enable pathologists to obtain AI results in real time. We organized a three-round ring study of 50 infiltrating duct carcinoma not otherwise specified (NOS) cases without neoadjuvant treatment, and recruited 33 pathologists from 6 hospitals. In the first ring study (RS1), the pathologists read 50 HER2 whole-slide images (WSIs) through an online system. After a 2-week washout period, they read the HER2 slides using a conventional microscope in RS2. After another 2-week washout period, the pathologists used our AI microscope for assisted interpretation in RS3. The consistency and accuracy of HER2 assessment by the AI-assisted microscope were significantly improved (p < 0.001) over those obtained using a conventional microscope and online WSI. Specifically, our AI-assisted microscope improved the precision of immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3 + and 2 + scoring while ensuring the recall of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)-positive results in IHC 2 + . Also, the average acceptance rate of AI for all pathologists was 0.90, demonstrating that the pathologists agreed with most AI scoring results., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

The identification of biomarkers on cancer tissue samples could be obtained through several technologies. In this setting, the immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization are accessible in most pathology laboratories. Particularly, immunohistochemistry can be used not only for diagnostic issues, but also to define prognostic classes and to define response to specific therapies. Particularly the last applications have been firstly developed in the breast cancer pathology. In addition, the development of molecular classification proposed some prognostic/predictive classes that could be easily defined by immunohistochemistry. Thus, the role of the pathologists has become increasingly important in the definition of prognosis and in the choice therapy, because the immunohistochemical biomarkers are used to guide treatment, to classify breast cancer into biologically and prognostically distinct subtypes. In this review, we will provide information on the current application of the immunohistochemical biomarkers useful in the management of breast cancer patients. Moreover, we consider the application of immunohistochemistry in the definition of the most promising biomarkers derived from molecular studies of the breast cancer, that in the future could integrate the characterization of breast cancer into clinical practice., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Patients with estrogen receptor (ER)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-, lymph node- breast cancer with high recurrence risk benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in addition to hormonal therapy. This study compares ER, progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status between routine immunohistochemistry (IHC)/in situ hybridization (ISH) and Oncotype DX (ODX) in 591 cases. ODX recurrence score (RS) and clinicopathologic features were compared between ER/PR-concordant and discordant cases. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides from ER discordant cases were reexamined. Concordance was high between ODX and IHC for ER status (580/591, 98.1%) and moderate for PR status (512/591, 86.6%). All 11 ER discordant cases were ER+ by IHC but ER- by ODX and high risk by ODX. Histologically, all of these cases were grade III invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), except one case diagnosed as IDC with apocrine features. Although this case was grade I and ER/PR+ by IHC, this patient received chemotherapy because of high RS. Of 79 PR discordant cases, 60 were PR+ by IHC but PR- by ODX. Five hundred eighty-four cases had available HER2 data, with high negative agreement (580/582, 99.7%). However, both HER2+ cases by ISH were HER2- by ODX. Mean RS was higher for ER discordant than concordant cases (48.0 versus 17.1, P < 0.0001) and for PR discordant (IHC+/ODX-) than concordant cases (27.2 versus 16.7, P < 0.0001) with no significant differences in recurrence or metastasis. Overall, detection was more sensitive by IHC, and high RS of discordant cases suggests possible risk overestimation. Therapeutic decisions for discordant cases should continue to be based on clinicopathologic correlation and not oncotype alone., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

To identify useful markers for prognostic and therapeutic purposes, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) provided a molecular classification of gastric cancers (GCs). Previous studies have used immunohistochemistry (IHC) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) to define immunophenotypic surrogate markers of the molecular alterations. Some critical issues concerning the correct definition of immunophenotypic groups have emerged in these studies that employed tissue microarrays (TMAs). We performed an immunophenotypic classification by evaluating MLH1, p53, HER2, E-cadherin, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) on the whole section of the surgical GC samples compared to most of the studies conducted on TMAs. We also investigated the immunohistochemical expression of PD-L1, a known therapeutic target. We identified the following immunophenotypic groups: EBV (2.9%); mismatch repair deficient (MMR-D) (7.2%); overexpressed p53 and/or HER2+ (61.4%); aberrant E-cadherin (11.4%); and normal pattern (17.1%). The use of surgical samples emphasized that some immunohistochemical markers were not useful for properly classifying the GC specimens. We can state that EBV (significantly correlated to PD-L1 expression) and MMR-D GCs are well-defined groups, mutually exclusive, and easily assessable with IHC and CISH, and could be candidates for immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. As regards p53, our findings suggest that IHC assessment may be responsible for a misclassification of GC groups. Immunohistochemical evaluation of E-cadherin needs to be standardized, particularly in terms of the heterogeneous cytoplasmic/membranous staining pattern. Whether to consider the normal-pattern group as a separate category remains to be clarified. Because GC specimens with known therapeutic targets account for only 40%, we suggest reviewing the immunophenotypic classification to find new therapeutic targets, such as PD-L1, MLH1, and HER2., (© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Assessment of HER2 status is considered standard of care in the histopathologic workup of breast cancer and conveys prognostic and predictive information used to guide treatment decisions. The assessment is often carried out in a two-step approach where immunohistochemical expression of HER2 protein is first evaluated by conventional microscopy and equivocal cases are further analyzed by in-situ hybridization techniques to assess gene amplification status. In this study we compared conventional manual assessment of immunohistochemical HER2 expression with digital image analysis (DIA) and consensus manual assessment by a panel of three pathologists., Methods: From our archive we retrieved sections of 109 invasive breast carcinomas stained for HER2 with corresponding HER2 score from the original pathology report. The glass slides were assessed by three pathologists to reach a consensus score. Next, the slides were scanned into whole slide images and DIA was performed using Aperio Imagescope. The scoring results were then compared with gene amplification status evaluated by dual in-situ hybridization (DISH)., Results: Comparing manual assessment with consensus assessment and DIA, good agreement was obtained with weighted kappa coefficients of 0.79 (manual vs. consensus) and 0.67 (manual vs. DIA). When compared with gene status assessment by DISH, agreement analysis yielded weighted kappa coefficients of 0.52 (manual vs. DISH), 0.58 (consensus vs. DISH) and 0.78 (DIA vs. DISH). There were no false negatives by any of the three methods and false positives ranging from 0.9 to 2.8%. The proportion of equivocal cases by each method was 44% (manual), 33.3% (consensus) and 14.7% (DIA). Application of DIA reduced the number of equivocal cases by 67% without increasing the proportion of false negatives., Conclusion: We conclude that DIA is an accurate method to reduce the number of HER2 equivocal cases without affecting the sensitivity of the HER2 assessment., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)

A national project for the quality assessment of breast immunohistochemistry, involving 155 pathology laboratories distributed all over the Italian territory ( 19 regions), was carried out. The Project lasted one year from December 2014 to December 2015 and it was strongly supported by the Italian Society of Anatomic Pathology (SIAPEC/IAP). Proficiency tests were carried out by the Nordic Immunohistochemical Quality Control (NordiQC) organization. The main aim of the project was to investigate on the general performance of immunohistochemistry (ER, PR and HER2) in the field of breast cancer in the Italian territory, in order to emphasize any difference and give practical support to laboratories in daily practice., The present review article focused on the description of this extraordinary pioneer Italian experience. Besides NordiQC results, further analysis concerning epidemiology and geographical distribution were done., Aim of the study was to analyze the general results and to discuss on the benefits that a national quality control program may have if it became a mandatory service provided by the National Health Care System., In general, the Italian data were in accordance with the general results obtained from the "official" NordiQC HER2, PR and ER assessments. A HER2 scoring consensus between labs and assessor group was achieved in 80% of cases., Interestingly, what emerges from our study is that no substantial differences exist among the three Italian macro-areas (North, Center and South) in the quality of Immunohistochemistry performed for breast cancer. No statistically significant difference was even found between laboratories that perform more or less than 100 tests/year., (Copyright © 2018 Società Italiana di Anatomia Patologica e Citopatologia Diagnostica, Divisione Italiana della International Academy of Pathology.)

The ASCO/CAP guidelines for HER2 reporting in breast cancer published in 2007 and were updated in 2013 to assure that the right patient receives the targeted therapy. The updated guidelines have lowered the threshold for HER2 positivity criteria and altered the equivocal category for both IHC and FISH. This first study from India addresses the impact of these updated guidelines in the various reporting categories at a tertiary care centre. We compared the trend of HER2 IHC reporting 1 year before (Period A) and 1 year after (Period B) the implementation of updated 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines. All HER2 equivocal IHC cases of post 2013 guidelines were reclassified as per 2007 guidelines to detect additional number of cases that have been put into equivocal category. Reflex FISH correlation was also assessed to detect any additional cases eligible for anti HER2 therapy with implementation of these updated guidelines. With implementation of updated 2013 guidelines, there was significant decrease in the number of cases scored as 1+ (from 30.7% to 20.6%; P value: .0001) while significant increase in number of 2+ cases (from 20.2% to 27.3%; P value: .004). Post 2013 guidelines, 39% (64 cases) of tumors were additionally put into the equivocal category which would have been considered as negative (score 1+) as per 2007 guidelines. The reflex FISH testing in these equivocal cases resulted in detection of only 1.5% of additional cases eligible for anti HER2 therapy. With implementation of updated 2013 guidelines, there is no significant increase in HER2 positivity trend. However, there is appreciable increase in IHC equivocal cases which subsequently led to increased reflex FISH testing without significantly contributing to the detection of additional eligible cases for anti HER2 therapy, but resulted in delaying of definite HER2 status along with financial implications., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Purpose: While HER2 testing is well established in directing appropriate treatment for breast cancer, a small percentage of cases show equivocal results by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Alternative probes may be used in equivocal cases. We present a single community-based institution's experience in further evaluating these cases., Patients and Methods: Between 2014 and 2016, 4255 samples were submitted for HER2 amplification testing by alternative probes, TP53, RAI1, and RARA. Of the patients tested by FISH, 505/3908 (12.9%) also had IHC data., Results: Most (73.9%) FISH equivocal cases remained equivocal after IHC testing. However, 50.5% of equivocal cases were classified as HER2 amplified by alternative probes. Most cases were positive by more than one probe: 78% of positive cases by RAI1 and 73.9% by TP53. There was a significant difference between IHC and FISH alternative testing (p < 0.0001) among the equivocal cases by conventional FISH testing, 44% of IHC negative cases became positive while 36% of the positive IHC cases became negative by alternative FISH testing. Available data showed that 41% of patients were treated with palbociclib and were positive by alternative FISH., Conclusion: The prevalence of double HER2 equivocal cases and the discrepancy between IHC and alternative FISH testing suggest that FISH alternative testing using both RAI1 and TP53 probes is necessary for conclusive classification. Because almost half of FISH equivocal cases converted to HER2 amplified upon alternative testing, clinical studies to determine the benefit of anti-HER2 therapy in these patients are urgently needed.

The use of biologics targeted to the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein is the latest addition to the armamentarium used to fight advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. The decision to treat with the biologic trastuzumab is completely dependent on HER2 testing of tumour tissue. In 2017, the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology jointly published guidelines for HER2 testing and clinical decision making in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. The Association of Clinical Pathologists Molecular Pathology and Diagnostics Committee has issued the following document as a commentary of these guidelines and, in parallel, to provide guidance on HER2 testing in National Health Service pathology departments within the UK. This guidance covers issues related to case selection, preanalytical aspects, analysis and interpretation of such HER2 testing., Competing Interests: Competing interests: NACSW has previously received antibodies and immunohistochemistry reagents from Roche Ventana for use in research projects. Other authors have no competing interests to declare., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Background: Human epidermal growth factor recptor-2 (HER2) was identified as a driver gene in several types of cancers with both prognostic and predictive value. However, the molecular association of HER2 gene mutation with HER2 gene amplification and/or protein expression in cancer tissues has not been clearly defined. Moreover, there is little information available on HER2 status role in tumor progression and metastasis in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) compared to other solid tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate both HER2 amplification and protein expression profiles using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and bright-field dual in situ hybridization (BDISH) techniques, respectively., Patients and Methods: Tissue microarray (TMA) was constructed to accommodate a total of 243 CRC formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples of consent patients and stained by IHC and BDISH methods. The expression patterns of HER2 protein status were evaluated and correlated to HER2 gene amplification status and then assessed for its prognostic value., Results: The expression profile of 58% samples showed cytoplasmic expression patterns of different categories. Interestingly, only 1% showed strong (+3) membranous expression pattern of HER2 with perfect match with their corresponding gene amplification status (>2). However, the cytoplasmic HER2 protein status did not show significant correlation with most clinicopathological features and survival outcomes except with age (p = 0.04) and tumor size (p = 0.03)., Conclusion: We demonstrated that the membranous HER2 gene/protein status is infrequent, while the main fraction of HER2 overexpression was cytoplasmic and lacking prognostic value. This cytoplasmic HER2 overexpression was induced through a gene-amplification independent pathway, making the HER2 gene status evaluation approach in those cases not worthy. Further investigations about the molecular pathways of the cytoplasmic HER2 protein in CRC and its associations with survival outcomes are required to allow either a breakthrough in CRC management; or to confirm the hypothesis of a marginal role in CRC onset and progression.

This viewpoint is a personal reflection on the values and merits of immunohistochemistry in current breast cancer diagnosis. Immunohistochemistry is a validated mainstay in molecular subtyping of invasive breast cancer. Immunohistochemical assessment of hormone receptor status and HER2 expression is used to determine the clinico-pathological surrogate of breast cancer intrinsic subtypes, which guide neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy. The advent of genomic prognostic signatures and qualitative mRNA-based assays makes some clinicians and researchers wonder whether immunohistochemistry should be abandoned. However, the perils and pitfalls of these mRNA-based tests cannot be neglected. This viewpoint offers a brief overview of quality issues in immunohistochemistry and qPCR, as well as a concise summary of currently available evidence on the correlation of immunohistochemistry and mRNA-based testing for prognostic and predictive markers in invasive breast cancer. We strongly advocate the use of immunohistochemistry as it integrates valuable spatial information with quantification of protein expression., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: HER2 assessment in biopsy specimens of gastric cancer (GC) is challenging because of the intratumoral heterogeneity. False negative results may be get because of limited biopsy material. The aim of this study is to explore how tumor-containing fragment number and biopsy specimen number affect HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) positive rate., Methods: Eight hundred and ninety biopsy specimens and 459 paired resected specimens were collected. IHC staining of HER2 was performed. HER2 IHC positive (scored 3+) rate was compared based on tumor-containing fragment number, biopsy specimen number, average size and tumor tissue proportion of tumor-containing fragments. The positive predictability of biopsy specimens to resected specimens was analyzed based on tumor fragment number., Results: HER2 IHC positive rates were 2.0, 3.5, 7.0, 13.2, 17.1, and 15.9% when tumor fragment numbers were 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 respectively. The rate rose with the increase of tumor fragment number (P = 0.004). ROC curve analysis showed that biopsy specimens exhibited positive predictability when tumor fragment number reached 3, but showed better performance when the number was ≥4 (P < 0.05). After fragment number reached 4, no statistic differences were reached in either HER2 IHC positive rate or positive predictability with further increase of the number (P > 0.05). HER2 IHC positive rate was not associated with biopsy number (P = 0.127), average size of tumor fragments (P = 0.397), and tumor tissue proportion of tumor fragments (P = 0.825) directly., Conclusions: The number of tumor-containing fragments influences HER2 IHC positive (scored 3+) rate. Greater than or equal to 4 (≥4) tumor fragments give better results in the positive rate as well as positive predictability. We recommend the number of tumor containing fragments be described in the HER2 IHC pathology reports for clinical reference in endoscopic biopsy specimens of GC.

Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) more commonly presents as metastatic disease and renders patients to be considered for chemotherapy. While treatment options are limited overall, trastuzumab has been shown to be effective for HER2 positive SRC cases. The current algorithm for HER2 evaluation heavily relies on positive membrane-specific staining by immunohistochemistry (IHC), but several anecdotal reports have suggested that SRCs may be susceptible to misinterpretation due to non-specific staining in the marginated cytoplasm with/without nucleus. Results of two FDA-approved IHC methods of HER2 evaluation, Pathway and HercepTest, along with silver in situ hybridisation were interpreted retrospectively and compared in 155 primary SRC cases. IHC results were discrepant between the two assays in SRC even at the strongest IHC scores. Discordance indeed occurred due to dark, non-specific staining obscured by the unique SRC morphology. True HER2 positive SRC was identified in three cases (3/155, 1.9%). In this study, we demonstrate the importance of recognising potential discrepancy in interpreting HER2 status depending on the assay used. Understanding this possible pitfall may prevent unnecessary trastuzumab in SRC patients., (Copyright © 2016 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network recently classified gastric adenocarcinoma into 4 molecular subtypes: Epstein-Barr virus-positive tumors, microsatellite-unstable tumors, tumors with chromosomal instability, and genomically stable tumors. We theorized that immunohistochemistry might be useful in similar categorization and that that HER2 expression might relate to subtype. We stained 104 gastric adenocarcinomas for MLH1, p53, and EBER in situ hybridization. We grouped them based on staining pattern and compared the groups. Cases were categorized as follows: group 1 (EBER positive), 7 cases (7%); group 2 (MLH1 deficient), 17 cases (16%); group 3 (aberrant p53 staining, EBER negative, retained MLH1), 40 cases (38%); group 4 (unremarkable staining), 40 cases (38%). This distribution was comparable to that found by the Research Network after accounting for the TP53 mutation rate in the chromosomal instability group. Group 1 patients had significantly longer follow-up times (median, 70 months versus 13 months for other groups; P = .0324). No group 2 cases overexpressed HER2. In group 3, 3 of 40 cases were HER2 immunohistochemistry positive, but 7 of 27 were HER2 positive by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Staining offers an efficient, reasonably accurate alternative for molecular subtyping of gastric adenocarcinoma, although some cases with chromosomal instability cannot be identified. These findings have potential prognostic and therapeutic implications., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Her2 protein is the key marker determining the choice of Herceptin therapy after a diagnosis of breast cancer. Its evaluation is made in most laboratories by immunohistochemistry, and interpreted by a pathologist using an optical microscope, a process subject to inter-observer variability, particularly for samples scored as equivocal (2+). Software analysis products have been introduced, seeking to reduce this variability. In this study, we compared the results of both traditional evaluation and a specific software package (VISIA Imaging) to those from fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)., Materials and Methods: We selected 176 cases of invasive breast cancer sampled during 2012-2014 that were classified as equivocal after evaluation of Her2 immunohistochemistry, and that were also evaluated by FISH. Each tissue slide was scanned with a digital D-Sight Fluo 2.0 microscope and analysed with VISIA Imaging S.r.l. software. The final results were categorised as follows: negative (0-1+), equivocal (2+), or positive (3+). Then each result was compared to that obtained by FISH., Result: The digital method confirmed 85 samples (48.3%) as equivocal (2+), while 23 (15.1%) were reclassified as negative (1+) and 44 (28.9%) as positive (3+). Of the 176 cases, 24 (13.6%) were not suitable for digital analysis (inadequate). Of 67 reclassified cases (1+ or 3+), 62 were in agreement with FISH results (concordance rate 92.5%). The sensitivity and specificity of the digital method were 100% and 82%, respectively., Conclusion: The application of this analysis software led to an improvement in the interpretation of cases classified as equivocal, decreasing the need for FISH and increasing diagnostic certainty., (Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

Background: Re-evaluation of the subtype of recurrent breast cancer is necessary for deciding the treatment approach, but it is often not performed due to the difficulty of obtaining tissue specimens from a recurrent lesion, etc. However, when a recurrent lesion is close to the body surface, fine-needle aspiration cells (FNA cells) can be easily obtained, and immunocytochemical (ICC) analysis of hormone receptors expression in FNA cells is said to be highly reliable. However, there is no consensus regarding ICC analysis of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) expression and the Ki67 index using FNA cells., Methods: Touch-smear cells (TSC) were prepared from resected specimens from 36 patients with primary invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. The TSC were fixed in 95 % ethanol and subjected to ICC analysis for HER2 using HercepTest™ (Dako) and Ki67 using MIB-1™ (Dako). HER2 expression and the Ki67 index for the TSC were compared with the results of immunohistochemical analysis of histological section (HS). Statistical analyses used the kappa test and Pearson's correlation coefficients., Results: HER2 and Ki67 were analyzed in TSC from 36 and 28 patients, respectively. The HER2 expression scores in the TSC and HS groups showed good agreement (kappa value =0.640) and significant correlation (correlation coefficient =0.860, p < 0.001). The Ki67 indexes in the TSC and HS groups also showed significant correlation (correlation coefficient =0.861, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: The reliability of ICC analysis of HER2 expression and the Ki67 index using TSC were recognized.

Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing of samples from recurrent or metastatic breast cancer is recommended by the 2013 update of the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines. Although cytological analysis can be applied to several types of metastatic lesions, the practical method for HER2 testing of cytological specimens is yet to be resolved. We conducted immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for HER2 in breast cancer cell blocks (CBs) and compared the results with those from the corresponding histological specimens. In cases of discrepancy between the two types of specimen, the bright-field HER2 dual in situ hybridization (DISH) assay was performed., Methods: CBs were prepared from 54 surgically excised breast cancers. The cells were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. A Ventana BenchMark ULTRA (Roche Diagnostics) with anti-HER-2/neu (4B5) rabbit monoclonal primary antibody and INFORM HER2/neu Dual ISH DNA Probe Cocktail was used for the assays., Results: Successful results were obtained in 52 of 54 CBs. Forty cases showed agreement between CBs and the histological specimens. No discrepancy was observed between the two types of specimens in cases where HER2 expression was positive. IHC results of CB in 12 discrepant cases were HER2 intermediate or negative. The DISH results of 11 of these cases were negative., Conclusion: IHC staining of HER2 for breast cancer CBs can be used in the same way as that used for histological specimens, although the number of equivocal cases in CBs is greater than that in histological specimens. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016;44:274-279. © 2016 The Authors Diagnostic Cytopathology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2016 The Authors Diagnostic Cytopathology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: IHC results for HER2/neu vary with replicate testing using the same antibody clone and when alternate clones are utilized. A number of factors appear to be responsible for this variability, including fixation times, equipment utilized and training and experience of staff. A number of studies have documented interobserver variability for a single antibody clone but few have evaluated reproducibility between antibody clones and which clones demonstrate the highest degree of interobserver reproducibility., Design: We studied a series of 93 cases stained by both the HercepTest™ and the 4B5 clone for interobserver reproducibility. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections were stained by the immunohistochemical technique using the manufactures directions for both the HercepTest™ and the 4B5 clone. FISH testing was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded sections according to the PathVysion HER-2 DNA probe kit instructions., Results: Absolute agreement rate for Hercep was 85%. Absolute agreement for 4B5 was 69%. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.0001). The chance-corrected agreement (weighted kappa) for the HercepTest™ was 79% and 71% for 4B5 (p<0.0001). Absolute agreement between antibody clones was 58% with the chance corrected agreement being 51%. Absolute agreement of 4B5 with FISH was significantly greater than that of the HercepTest™ (54% vs 35%)., Conclusion: Agreement between evaluators was greater with the HercepTest. However, agreement with FISH results was superior for the 4B5 clone. Interobserver agreement was less than the 95% agreement threshold recommended by the ASCO/CAP guidelines for development of a new testing method for HER2 evaluation., (Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

Immunohistochemical analysis has been a key clinical tool that shows the protein expression of molecular markers. Expression of molecular markers in breast pathology has been used to distinguish breast cancers from benign lesions, classify subtypes of breast cancers, and determine therapeutic intervention. It is a relatively fast and efficient option in stratifying breast lesions to assist in both determining pathology diagnosis and offer strategies to the best course of clinical action. In this chapter, we discuss the use of immunohistochemistry testing for some of the key molecular markers involved in breast pathology that are crucial for classifying breast cancers and the guidelines for the interpretation of testing results that assist in clinical management.

Triple-negative breast cancers are a heterogeneous group of tumors that are, as yet, not entirely understood. Although triple-negative carcinomas are strictly defined as invasive carcinomas lacking expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2, some use the terms triple-negative and basal-like cancer synonymously. It should be noted that these are not entirely equivalent. Nevertheless, it has been shown that a panel of immunohistochemical markers can be used as a surrogate for genomic profiling and thus to identify basal-like breast cancers. We describe the panels of immunohistochemical markers that can be applied and how to interpret these markers herein.

Background: Inclusion of trastuzumab in chemotherapy regimens is advantageous for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer who overexpress HER2. Therefore, accurate assessment of HER2 status in tumor tissue is critical when weighing treatment options., Methods: We examined HER2 expression in 180 paired endoscopic biopsy and surgical excision specimens of gastric cancers via immunohistochemistry (IHC). Equivocal IHC results (IHC 2+) were resolved by HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The relationships of several clinical and pathological features with discordant HER2 results in paired specimens were determined., Results: Fourteen biopsy specimens and surgical specimens (7.8%) were HER2-positive. Discordant HER2 IHC scores were observed in 90 paired specimens (50%) and 8 paired specimens (4.4%) had discordant results. The kappa coefficients for an HER2 diagnostic algorithm were 0.264, 0.339, and 0.690 for IHC scores, IHC categories, and final results, respectively (p < 0.001). Discordant HER2 results were significantly associated with discordant tumor differentiation in the paired biopsy and excision specimens (p = 0.01). Intratumoral heterogeneity did not predict HER2 discordance. There was no association between HER2 discordance and the number of biopsy tissue fragments (p = 0.764)., Conclusions: Hofmann's HER2 scoring system is a fairly reliable tool for evaluating HER2 status in biopsy and excision specimens. Discordant HER2 results in paired specimens were observed in a small percentage of gastric cancers. Testing all available specimens should be considered in order to eliminate discrepancies, especially when discordant tumor differentiation is observed.

The College of American Pathologists Accreditation Checklist requires comparison of laboratory predictive results with published benchmarks but does not require analysis of individual pathologists. With the availability of targeted human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein therapy, uniform reporting of HER2 protein status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is essential. Our aim was to compare HER2 IHC results among pathologists in routine clinical practice within a single institution and assess the impact of simultaneous IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) ordering. We reviewed reports from 928 consecutive breast needle biopsies from 2008 to 2012 at a tertiary academic medical center in which HER2 IHC and HER2 FISH were ordered. There was a significant association between breast pathologist and IHC result (negative, 49.8%-83.2%; positive, 8.7%-14.1%; equivocal, 5.2%-41.5%; P < .0001) but not breast pathologist and FISH result (P = .69). For 1 pathologist, IHC signed out with FISH had an equivocal rate nearly 2-fold lower than IHC results that were reported first (10.5% versus 20.9%) (P = .04). Institutions should be aware that although overall HER2 IHC reporting may be consistent with guidelines, there can be significant variation among practitioners. In addition to aggregate data, we recommend comparing the rates from individual pathologists to standards. Furthermore, routine simultaneous ordering of both IHC and FISH could impact interpretation of test results and may inappropriately encourage less confidence in IHC results among pathologists., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We performed this meta-analysis study to evaluate the concordance and discordance between immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in detecting HER2 alteration in human breast cancer., Methods: As a meta-analysis, the present study evaluated the available data from previous studies on the HER2 gene detected by IHC and FISH. To indicate the meta-analysis results, a forest plot was used., Results: We identified 172 citations, for which our inclusion criteria were met by 18 articles, representing 6629 cases. The overall concordance and discordance rate between IHC staining with score 0/1+ and FISH for detection failure of HER2 expression was 96 and 4 %, respectively. The present study showed that the overall proportion of FISH positive and negative rate for IHC score 2+ for detection of HER2 expression was 36 and 64 %, respectively; and 91 and 9 % for 3+ IHC scores., Conclusion: The results of this study show that IHC score 0/1+ and 3+ cannot be completely considered as negative and positive breast cancer test, respectively. Therefore, we suggest a valid and complementary test, the same as FISH, to explore HER2 expression.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are widely used semiquantitative assays for selecting breast cancer patients for HER2 antibody therapy. However, both techniques have been shown to have disadvantages. Our aim was to test a recent automated technique of combined IHC and brightfield dual in situ hybridization-gene protein detection platform (GPDP)-in breast cancer HER2 protein, gene, and chromosome 17 centromere status evaluations, comparing the results in accordance to the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists recommendations for HER2 testing in breast cancer from both 2007 and 2013. The GPDP technique performance was evaluated on 52 consecutive whole slide invasive breast cancer cases with HER2 IHC 2/3+ scoring results. Applying in turns the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists recommendations for HER2 testing in breast cancer from 2007 and 2013 to both FISH and GPDP DISH assays, the HER2 gene amplification results showed 100% concordance among amplified/nonamplified cases, but there was a shift in 4 cases toward positive from equivocal results and toward equivocal from negative results. This might be related to the emphasis on the average HER2 copy number in the 2013 criteria. HER2 expression by IVD market IHC kit (Pathway®) has a strong correlation with GPDP HER2 protein, including a full concordance for all cases scored as 3+ and a reduction from 2+ to 1+ in 7 cases corresponding to nonamplified cases. Gene protein detection platform HER2 protein "solo" could have spared the need for 7 FISH studies. In addition, the platform offered advantages on interpretation reassurance including selecting areas for counting gene signals paralleled with protein IHC expression, on heterogeneity detection, interpretation time, technical time, and tissue expense., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Clinical decisions regarding the suitability of adjuvant systemic therapy for individual patients with breast cancer depends on comprehensive assessment of the underlying biology of each patient's tumor. The previous clinical-pathologic paradigm for treatment, which had been used for decades, now has been augmented by significant advances in molecular analysis of breast tumor tissue samples. Molecular testing has the potential to understand better both tumor biology and clinical behavior, which enables more appropriate therapy choices to be made. We review the rapid evolution in profiling breast cancer tissues, and discuss the current evidence for clinical use of this information and how the emerging molecular paradigm can be integrated into the clinical-pathologic context as we progress toward "precision" therapy for patients with breast cancer and other solid tumors.

Biomarker assessment of breast cancer tumor samples is part of the routine workflow of pathology laboratories. International guidelines have recently been updated, with special regards to the pre-analytical steps that are critical for the quality of immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization procedures, whatever the biomarker analyzed. Fixation and specimen handling protocols must be standardized, validated and carefully tracked. Cooperation and training of the personnel involved in the specimen workflow (e.g. radiologists, surgeons, nurses, technicians and pathologists) are of paramount importance. The GEFPICS' update of the recommendations herein details and comments the different steps of the pre-analytical process. Application of these guidelines and participation to quality insurance programs are mandatory to ensure the correct evaluation of oncotheranostic biomarkers., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Although there have been several studies on the use of immunohistochemical biomarkers of canine mammary tumors (CMTs), the results are difficult to compare. This article provides guidelines on the most useful immunohistochemical markers to standardize their use and understand how outcomes are measured, thus ensuring reproducibility of results. We have reviewed the biomarkers of canine mammary epithelial and myoepithelial cells and identified those biomarkers that are most useful and those biomarkers for invasion and lymph node micrometastatic disease. A 10% threshold for positive reaction for most of these markers is recommended. Guidelines on immunolabeling for HER2, estrogen receptors (ERs), and progesterone receptors (PRs) are provided along with the specific recommendations for interpretation of the results for each of these biomarkers in CMTs. Only 3+ HER2-positive tumors should be considered positive, as found in human breast cancer. The lack of any known response to adjuvant endocrine therapy of ER- and PR-positive CMTs prevents the use of the biological positive/negative threshold used in human breast cancer. Immunohistochemistry results of ER and PR in CMTs should be reported as the sum of the percentage of positive cells and the intensity of immunolabeling (Allred score). Incorporation of these recommendations in future studies, either prospective or retrospective, will provide a mechanism for the direct comparison of studies and will help to determine whether these biomarkers have prognostic significance. Finally, these biomarkers may ascertain the most appropriate treatment(s) for canine malignant mammary neoplasms.

Objectives: To investigate the clinical and pathobiological significance of distinguishing score 0 and score 1+ within the group of immunohistochemistry (IHC)-negative invasive breast cancers., Methods: We studied HER2 status using both IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 150 consecutive breast tumors submitted to our laboratory after a negative IHC result in local testing centers., Results: We were able to discern a group of score 0 tumors that had a lower HER2 copy number than the group consisting of score 1+ tumors. In contrast with the group of score 1+ tumors, HER2 FISH was consistently negative for both copy number-based and ratio-based tumors without equivocal results., Conclusions: In a setting with stringent quality assurance, score 0 and score 1+ tumors emerge as distinct and clinically important subgroups within the HER2 IHC-negative population.

In contrast to breast HER2 testing, the optimal ISH method and antibody for gastric HER2 testing are unclear. The aim of this study was to find out gastric HER2 positivity rates in our institutional data, and to compare the two novel ISH methods with A0485 antibody and HercepTest™. IHC and ISH were carried out on gastrectomy specimens of 88 patients up to the standardly advised procedure protocols, and interpretations were also carried out up to widely accepted international protocols., HER2 expression was (-) in 65, (+) in 5, (++) in 6, and (+++) in 12 cases by A0485 IHC. IHC (+) 4 cases and (++) 3 cases were (-) by HercepTest™. One IHC (-) amplified case was (++) by HercepTest™. All A0485 and HercepTest™ (+++) 12 cases were amplified by ISH. HER2 amplification was detected in 18 (20.4%) and in 15 (17.2%) cases by SISH and FISH, respectively. Of the 18 cases, 4 showed focal heterogeneous low level amplification by SISH. Focal amplification was noted in only 2 cases by FISH. The HER2 status of our gastric cancer file is 17.2% by FISH, 20.4% by SISH. The concordance between HercepTest™/A0485 IHC and ISH is perfect in (+++) cases. Equivocal results (++) with any IHC method should be clarified by one of the molecular methods (SISH and FISH). Probably up to the higher level of heterogeneity of gastric carcinomas, there is a 4.5% dilemma of cases that are negative or weakly positive by conventional IHC methods. Therefore, regarding HER2 status in gastric carcinoma, the reliability of IHC methods should be checked., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)

Background: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) tests are commonly used to assess human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) status of tumors in patients with breast cancer. This analysis evaluates the likely cost-effectiveness of expanded retesting to assess HER2 tumor status in women with early stage breast cancer., Methods: We developed a decision-analytic model to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of expanded reflex testing from a US payer perspective. Expanded reflex testing is defined as retesting tumor specimens from patients whose tumors are IHC0, IHC1+, or FISH-negative on their first test. In the base case, we assumed that 80% of patient tumors are initially IHC-tested and 20% are FISH-tested. Testing outcomes for IHC and FISH with and without retesting were based on published meta-analyses. The cost of tests and treatment and the long-term health outcomes were obtained from the literature., Results: In the base case, we estimated that 2.27% of women who received expanded reflex testing would be HER2-positive and receive trastuzumab treatment: the projected ICER was $36,721 per life year or $39,745 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). This varied between $47,100 per QALY and $35,500 per QALY if we assumed that 1%-8% of patients retested were then HER2+, respectively. The results of deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were robust. This strategy would result in 4700 (2000-17,000) patients being eligible to receive trastuzumab treatment annually., Conclusions: Retesting patients who are IHC0, IHC1+, or FISH-negative is projected to be a cost-effective clinical strategy., (Copyright © 2013 American Cancer Society.)

Her2 proto-oncogene amplification and protein overexpression is observed in 20-40% of patients with breast cancer and plays a crucial role in invasive breast cancer and its treatment. In the present study, we investigated samples from 131 patients with invasive breast carcinoma. In all cases, the overexpression/amplification level of Her2 was determined using manual immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or automatic IHC, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), silver in situ hybridization (SISH) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Using various methods, we demonstrated candidate methods for Her2 detection and their dependability. Our results demonstrate that these methods are highly comparable for the detection of Her2 overexpression/amplification. It was also revealed that qPCR is a valuable tool for the evaluation of Her2 gene overexpression/amplification. The results from pPCR analysis positively correlated with the results from IHC and FISH analysis. Moreover, in contrast to IHC or SISH/FISH, the results obtained by qPCR were not encumbered with any subjective error on the part of the evaluator.

Abstract Background In 2022, our team launched the pioneering national proficiency testing (PT) scheme for the pathological diagnosis of breast cancer, rapidly establishing its credibility throughout China. Aiming to continuously monitor and improve the proficiency of Chinese pathologists in breast pathology, the second round of the PT scheme was initiated in 2023, which will expand the number of participating institutions, and will conduct a nationwide investigation into the interpretation of HER2 0, 1+, and 2+/FISH- categories in China. Methods The methodology employed in the current round of PT scheme closely mirrors that of the preceding cycle in 2022, which is designed and implemented according to the “Conformity assessment—General requirements for proficiency testing”(GB/T27043—2012/ISO/IEC 17043:2010). More importantly, we utilized a statistics-based method to generate assigned values to enhance their robustness and credibility. Results The final PT results, published on the website of the National Quality Control Center for Cancer ( http://117.133.40.88:3927 ), showed that all participants passed the testing. However, a few institutions demonstrated systemic biases in scoring HER2 0, 1+, and 2+/FISH- with accuracy levels below 59%, considered unsatisfactory. Especially, the concordance rate for HER2 0 cases was only 78.1%, indicating challenges in distinguishing HER2 0 from low HER2 expression. Meanwhile, areas for histologic type and grade interpretation improvement were also noted. Conclusions Our PT scheme demonstrated high proficiency in diagnosing breast cancer in China. But it also identified systemic biases in scoring HER2 0, 1+, and 2+/FISH- at some institutions. More importantly, our study highlighted challenges in the evaluation at the extreme lower end of the HER2 staining spectrum, a crucial area for further research. Meanwhile, it also revealed the need for improvements in interpreting histologic types and grades. These findings strengthened the importance of robust quality assurance mechanisms, like the nationwide PT scheme conducted in this study, to maintain high diagnostic standards and identify areas requiring further training and enhancement.

Abstract In many countries, hormone receptor status assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is routinely performed, as hormone receptor-positive DCIS patients are eligible for adjuvant anti-hormonal treatment, aiming to reduce the ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer risk. Although HER2 gene amplification and its associated HER2 protein overexpression constitute a major prognostic and predictive marker in invasive breast carcinoma, its use in the diagnosis and treatment of DCIS is less straightforward. HER2 immunohistochemistry is not routinely performed yet, as the role of HER2-positivity in DCIS biology is unclear. Nonetheless, recent data challenge this practice. Here, we discuss the value of routine HER2 assessment for DCIS. HER2-positivity correlates strongly with DCIS grade: around four in five HER2-positive DCIS show high grade atypia. As morphological DCIS grading is prone to interobserver variability, HER2 immunohistochemistry could render grading more robust. Several studies showed an association between HER2-positive DCIS and ipsilateral recurrence risk, albeit currently unclear whether this is for overall, in situ or invasive recurrence. HER2-positive DCIS tends to be larger, with a higher risk of involved surgical margins. HER2-positive DCIS patients benefit more from adjuvant radiotherapy: it substantially decreases the local recurrence risk after lumpectomy, without impact on overall survival. HER2-positivity in pure biopsy-diagnosed DCIS is associated with increased upstaging to invasive carcinoma after surgery. HER2 immunohistochemistry on preoperative biopsies might therefore provide useful information to surgeons, favoring wider excisions. The time seems right to consider DCIS subtype-dependent treatment, comprising appropriate local treatment for HER2-positive DCIS patients and de-escalation for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative DCIS patients.

Primary endometrial serous carcinoma, known for its aggressive nature and poor prognosis, shares similarities with breast and gastric cancers in terms of potential HER2 overexpression as a therapeutic target. Assessing HER expression is complicated by tumor heterogeneity and discrepancies between primary and metastatic sites. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed HER amplification and expression in 16 pairs of primary endometrial serous carcinoma resections and corresponding metastases. HER2 status was determined using immunohistochemistry (IHC), with criteria based on the percentage and intensity of tumor cell staining. Confirmatory techniques, such as dual in situ hybridization (DISH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), were also employed. This study reports on the concordance rates and the presence and pattern of HER2 heterogeneity. Our results showed an 87.5% concordance rate in HER2 amplification status between primary and metastatic sites, with 33% of cases scored as 2+ being amplified. Heterogeneity was observed in 100% of amplified cases and 95% of non-amplified cases on in situ testing, with variations in heterogeneity patterns between techniques. In conclusion, our findings emphasize the importance of testing both primary and metastatic sites or recurrences, with a concordance rate of 87.5%. In addition, a review of the literature and combining the results showed a concordance rate of up to 68%. The presence and pattern of heterogeneity, particularly in cases of mosaic or clustered heterogeneity in the primary tumor, may serve as reliable indicators of concordance, predicting a non-amplified HER2 status in corresponding metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In 2022, our team launched the pioneering national proficiency testing (PT) scheme for the pathological diagnosis of breast cancer, rapidly establishing its credibility throughout China. Aiming to continuously monitor and improve the proficiency of Chinese pathologists in breast pathology, the second round of the PT scheme was initiated in 2023, which will expand the number of participating institutions, and will conduct a nationwide investigation into the interpretation of HER2 0, 1+, and 2+/FISH- categories in China. Methods: The methodology employed in the current round of PT scheme closely mirrors that of the preceding cycle in 2022, which is designed and implemented according to the "Conformity assessment—General requirements for proficiency testing"(GB/T27043—2012/ISO/IEC 17043:2010). More importantly, we utilized a statistics-based method to generate assigned values to enhance their robustness and credibility. Results: The final PT results, published on the website of the National Quality Control Center for Cancer (http://117.133.40.88:3927), showed that all participants passed the testing. However, a few institutions demonstrated systemic biases in scoring HER2 0, 1+, and 2+/FISH- with accuracy levels below 59%, considered unsatisfactory. Especially, the concordance rate for HER2 0 cases was only 78.1%, indicating challenges in distinguishing HER2 0 from low HER2 expression. Meanwhile, areas for histologic type and grade interpretation improvement were also noted. Conclusions: Our PT scheme demonstrated high proficiency in diagnosing breast cancer in China. But it also identified systemic biases in scoring HER2 0, 1+, and 2+/FISH- at some institutions. More importantly, our study highlighted challenges in the evaluation at the extreme lower end of the HER2 staining spectrum, a crucial area for further research. Meanwhile, it also revealed the need for improvements in interpreting histologic types and grades. These findings strengthened the importance of robust quality assurance mechanisms, like the nationwide PT scheme conducted in this study, to maintain high diagnostic standards and identify areas requiring further training and enhancement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tyrosine protein kinase HER2 plays an important role in carcinogenesis. In breast cancer (BC), the HER2 gene is amplified in approximately 20% of cases. Trastuzumab is used to treat BC with HER2 gene amplification. Trastuzumab is not effective in treating tumors with low HER2 expression, but trastuzumab deruxtecan was recently found to significantly improve prognosis in these patients. Nonetheless, there are still difficulties with accurate diagnosis of HER2-low BC, especially at the preoperative stage. In this study, when comparing the results between core needle biopsies and resection specimens using three immunohistochemistry scores (0, 1+, and 3+) of the HER2 protein level, we observed only moderate agreement (66.2%, κ = 0.486) in patients who did not undergo neoadjuvant therapy (n = 71). Other miRNA- or protein-coding genes regulated by HER2 signaling pathways may be additional markers for the scoring of the HER2 level. We measured levels of HER2-regulated miR-378a, -205, and -21 and mRNA levels of their target genes TRPS1, ITGA2, BCL6, and PTEN in BC surgical specimens. For estrogen receptor-positive BC (n = 64), we confirmed that the expression of miR-21, miR-378a, TRPS1, PTEN, and BCL6 is associated with the HER2 protein level. Moreover, the expression profile of miR-378a, BCL6, and PTEN differed between HER2 1+ and HER2 3+ tumors. TRPS1 expression was significantly higher in HER2 3+ tumors compared with HER2 0 tumors, but there was no difference in the amount of TRPS1 mRNA between HER2 1+ and HER2 3+ tumors. Thus, an analysis of the expression of miR-21, miR-378a, TRPS1, PTEN, and BCL6 may help to distinguish between HER2-negative, HER2-positive, and HER2-low BCs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In many countries, hormone receptor status assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is routinely performed, as hormone receptor-positive DCIS patients are eligible for adjuvant anti-hormonal treatment, aiming to reduce the ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer risk. Although HER2 gene amplification and its associated HER2 protein overexpression constitute a major prognostic and predictive marker in invasive breast carcinoma, its use in the diagnosis and treatment of DCIS is less straightforward. HER2 immunohistochemistry is not routinely performed yet, as the role of HER2-positivity in DCIS biology is unclear. Nonetheless, recent data challenge this practice. Here, we discuss the value of routine HER2 assessment for DCIS. HER2-positivity correlates strongly with DCIS grade: around four in five HER2-positive DCIS show high grade atypia. As morphological DCIS grading is prone to interobserver variability, HER2 immunohistochemistry could render grading more robust. Several studies showed an association between HER2-positive DCIS and ipsilateral recurrence risk, albeit currently unclear whether this is for overall, in situ or invasive recurrence. HER2-positive DCIS tends to be larger, with a higher risk of involved surgical margins. HER2-positive DCIS patients benefit more from adjuvant radiotherapy: it substantially decreases the local recurrence risk after lumpectomy, without impact on overall survival. HER2-positivity in pure biopsy-diagnosed DCIS is associated with increased upstaging to invasive carcinoma after surgery. HER2 immunohistochemistry on preoperative biopsies might therefore provide useful information to surgeons, favoring wider excisions. The time seems right to consider DCIS subtype-dependent treatment, comprising appropriate local treatment for HER2-positive DCIS patients and de-escalation for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative DCIS patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]