Search

Background: Chlamydia pneumoniae has been hypothesized to play a role in atherothrombosis. However, prospective data relating exposure to Chlamydia pneumoniae and risks of future myocardial infarction (MI) are sparse., Methods and Results: In a prospective cohort of nearly 15 000 healthy men, we measured IgG antibodies directed against Chlamydia pneumoniae in blood samples collected at baseline from 343 study participants who subsequently reported a first MI and from an equal number of age- and smoking-matched control subjects who did not report vascular disease during a 12-year follow-up period. The proportion of study subjects with IgG antibodies directed against Chlamydia increased with age and cigarette consumption. However, prevalence rates of Chlamydia IgG seropositivity were virtually identical at baseline among men who subsequently reported first MI compared with age- and smoking-matched control subjects. Specifically, the relative risks of future MI associated with Chlamydia pneumoniae IgG titers >/=1:16, 1:32, 1:64, 1:128, and 1:256 were 1.1, 1.0, 1.1, 1.0, and 0.8, respectively (all probability values not significant). There was no association in analyses adjusted for other risk factors, evaluating early as compared with late events, or among nonsmokers. Further, there was no association between seropositivity and concentration of C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation that predicts MI risk in this cohort., Conclusions: In a large-scale study of socioeconomically homogeneous men that controlled for age, smoking, and other cardiovascular risk factors, we found no evidence of association between Chlamydia pneumoniae IgG seropositivity and risks of future MI.

We describe an ELISA for serum IgG antibodies against malondialdehyde-modified low-density lipoprotein (mLDL). Optimal antigen concentration, serum dilution, and dilution of enzyme-conjugated second antibody were 25 mg/L, 1:250, and 1:5000, respectively, when 5 g/L human serum albumin was used for blocking. When data were expressed as mLDL/LDL (the ratio of IgG binding to mLDL vs LDL), within-run and between-run CVs were 7.0% and 8.9%, respectively. Antibody concentrations expressed as mLDL/LDL or as mLDL-LDL (the difference between IgG binding to mLDL and to LDL) were higher in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (n = 20) than in controls (n = 20) (P < 0.001). With bovine serum albumin or Superblock blocking buffers, only the mLDL-LDL data were significant. Thus, the choice of blocking agent and the method of data expression should be carefully considered when assaying IgG antibodies against mLDL.

Certain serum samples produce high background in Western and direct immunoblot assays that detect human serum IgG against specific antigens. We determined that this was due to a reaction between endogenous IgG and the membrane blocking agent (we refer to this as blocking-specific background). Using milk as blocking agent, we screened 107 sera by Western immunoblot or checkerboard immunoblot assays, and found that 6.5% of sera had background intensities sufficient to interfere with the interpretation of final results. Blocking-specific background was also observed using bovine serum albumin and other animal protein-based blocking agents. As the primary antibody in these immunoblot assays was human IgG, we investigated human serum albumin as a blocking agent; this approach eliminated the problem of blocking-specific background.

In the present study, we have begun to investigate the possibility of using checkerboard immunoblotting (CBIB) as a semi-quantitative screening tool for detecting human serum IgG against specific viral antigens. The viral antigens studied were Epstein-Barr, herpes simplex I and II, cytomegalovirus, varicella zoster, rubella, rubeola, and mumps. Western immunoblotting experiments using these partially purified preparations demonstrated that there were apparently no interactions between IgG from non-immune sera and the respective viral antigen preparations. The CBIB assay was evaluated using sera of known positive or negative immune status for the viral antigens. There was excellent agreement between the results of CBIB and the results of alternative methods for evaluating immune status: all discrepancies (1/18 sera for mumps, 3/18 sera for rubeola, and 1/28 sera for rubella) involved sera with borderline results, either by CBIB or by the alternative method. Therefore, although further work is required to define the method in terms of sensitivity and clinical specificity, and to refine positive/negative cutpoint criteria for certain antigen components, our preliminary experience suggests that CBIB has considerable potential in the efficient and inexpensive screening of sera for the presence of IgG against a panel of viral antigens, so as to identify subjects at risk for infection.