Search

The introduction of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has markedly improved outcomes for advanced melanoma. However, many patients develop resistance through unknown mechanisms. While combination ICB has improved response rate and progression-free survival, it substantially increases toxicity. Biomarkers to distinguish patients who would benefit from combination therapy versus aPD-1 remain elusive. We analyzed whole-exome sequencing of pretreatment tumors from four cohorts ( n = 140) of ICB-naïve patients treated with aPD-1. High genomic heterogeneity and low ploidy robustly identified patients intrinsically resistant to aPD-1. To establish clinically actionable predictions, we optimized and validated a predictive model using ploidy and heterogeneity to confidently identify (90% PPV) patients with intrinsic resistance to and worse survival on aPD-1. We further observed that three of seven (43%) patients predicted to be intrinsically resistant to single-agent PD-1 ICB responded to combination ICB, suggesting that these patients may benefit disproportionately from combination ICB. These findings highlight the importance of heterogeneity and ploidy, nominating an approach toward clinical actionability.

With the successful development of immune checkpoint blockade, there remains the continued need to improve efficacy and decrease toxicities. The addition of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to ipilimumab has previously demonstrated both an improvement in efficacy and decrease in the incidence of high-grade adverse events. ICOS+CD4+ or ICOS+CD8+ peripheral blood T cells are significantly greater in the patients treated with ipilimumab plus GM-CSF than in the patients treated with ipilimumab alone. To better understand the effects of GM-CSF on inducible T-cell costimulator (ICOS) and clinical outcomes, the relative roles of identified soluble ICOS and membrane-bound ICOS were evaluated. The ICOS splice variant was secreted and found to have immunologic suppressive effects. Changes in soluble ICOS splice variant levels in treated patients correlated with clinical outcomes. GM-CSF enhanced membrane-bound ICOS in an IL12-dependent manner but did not increase soluble ICOS levels. Whereas soluble ICOS plays a role in immune suppression, GM-CSF efficacy involves increasing membrane-bound ICOS and induction of dendritic cell development. Thus, soluble ICOS splice variants may be used as a biomarker for GM-CSF and immune checkpoint blockade-based therapies., (©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr LeBoeuf is a consultant and has received honoraria from Bayer, Seattle Genetics, Sanofi, Silverback, and Synox Therapeutics outside the submitted work. Drs Bougrine, Bui, Buchbinder, and Giobbie-Hurder have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is resistant to PD-1 and PD-L1 (PD[L]-1)-targeted therapy have poor outcomes. Studies suggest that radiotherapy could enhance antitumour immunity. Therefore, we investigated the potential benefit of PD-L1 (durvalumab) and CTLA-4 (tremelimumab) inhibition alone or combined with radiotherapy., Methods: This open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial was done by the National Cancer Institute Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network at 18 US sites. Patients aged 18 years or older with metastatic NSCLC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and progression during previous PD(L)-1 therapy were eligible. They were randomly assigned (1:1:1) in a web-based system by the study statistician using a permuted block scheme (block sizes of three or six) without stratification to receive either durvalumab (1500 mg intravenously every 4 weeks for a maximum of 13 cycles) plus tremelimumab (75 mg intravenously every 4 weeks for a maximum of four cycles) alone or with low-dose (0·5 Gy delivered twice per day, repeated for 2 days during each of the first four cycles of therapy) or hypofractionated radiotherapy (24 Gy total delivered over three 8-Gy fractions during the first cycle only), 1 week after initial durvalumab-tremelimumab administration. Study treatment was continued until 1 year or until progression. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (best locally assessed confirmed response of a partial or complete response) and, along with safety, was analysed in patients who received at least one dose of study therapy. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02888743, and is now complete., Findings: Between Aug 24, 2017, and March 29, 2019, 90 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, of whom 78 (26 per group) were treated. This trial was stopped due to futility assessed in an interim analysis. At a median follow-up of 12·4 months (IQR 7·8-15·1), there were no differences in overall response rates between the durvalumab-tremelimumab alone group (three [11·5%, 90% CI 1·2-21·8] of 26 patients) and the low-dose radiotherapy group (two [7·7%, 0·0-16·3] of 26 patients; p=0·64) or the hypofractionated radiotherapy group (three [11·5%, 1·2-21·8] of 26 patients; p=0·99). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were dyspnoea (two [8%] in the durvalumab-tremelimumab alone group; three [12%] in the low-dose radiotherapy group; and three [12%] in the hypofractionated radiotherapy group) and hyponatraemia (one [4%] in the durvalumab-tremelimumab alone group vs two [8%] in the low-dose radiotherapy group vs three [12%] in the hypofractionated radiotherapy group). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in one (4%) patient in the durvalumab-tremelimumab alone group (maculopapular rash), five (19%) patients in the low-dose radiotherapy group (abdominal pain, diarrhoea, dyspnoea, hypokalemia, and respiratory failure), and four (15%) patients in the hypofractionated group (adrenal insufficiency, colitis, diarrhoea, and hyponatremia). In the low-dose radiotherapy group, there was one death from respiratory failure potentially related to study therapy., Interpretation: Radiotherapy did not increase responses to combined PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibition in patients with NSCLC resistant to PD(L)-1 therapy. However, PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 therapy could be a treatment option for some patients. Future studies should refine predictive biomarkers in this setting., Funding: The US National Institutes of Health and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JDS declares research support paid to their institution from Merck, BMS, Regeneron, Debiopharm, and the NCI; consulting or participation on a scientific advisory board, and travel fees and payment for lectures from Genentech, Immunitas, Debiopharm, BMS, Nanobiotix, Tilos, AstraZeneca, LEK, Catenion, ACI Clinical, Astellas, Stimit, and Merck; expert witness fees from Pearson Doyle Mohre and Pastis, Kline and Specter, and Heidell, Pittoni, Murphy and Bach; stock options from Immunitas; and equity in Doximity. SMA declares research support paid to her institution from Merck, Exilixis, Abbvie, Kura Oncology, Amgen, and Nektar. RDG declares support for the present manuscript from a grant from the NCI of the National Institutes of Health (NIH); grants or contracts (to his institution) from Pfizer, Mirati, Daiichi Sankyo, Jounce Therapeutics, Helsinn, BMS, Merck, Janssen, and Takeda; honoraria from Rockpointe CME, Targeted Oncology, OncLive, and the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer; reimbursement for travel for meetings from Pfizer and AstraZeneca; participation on advisory boards for Mirati, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Oncocyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, BluePrint Medicines, and Pfizer; and that he is co-chair of the Hoosier Cancer Research Network Thoracic Clinical Trial Working Group. CL declares honorarium for chairing the data and safety monitoring board for Delcath. JH declares participation on advisory boards for Bayer and Merck, and research funding from Merck, Boston Biomedical, Treos Bio, Senhwa Biosciences, Bayer, Incyte, TriOncology, Seattle Genetics, Hutchison MediPharma, Pionyr Immunotherapeutics, Trovogene, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Effector Therapeutics, and G1 Therapeutics. JLA declares research support from Pfizer; scientific advisory board membership for the Lustgarten Foundation, Stand Up to Cancer, Moleculin Biotech, Bessor Pharma, and Fujifilm; stock options from Bessor Pharma and Moleculin Biotech; and honoraria for data and safety monitoring board membership from Panbela Therapeutics and the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network. SKJ declares grant funding to her institution from the NCI and the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, and is a consultant and adjudication committee member for Merck, IMX Medical, and Syntactx. NVU has consulted for QED, Ipsen, Taiho, Incyte, AstraZeneca, and Astellas, and declares research funding from Taiho, Eli Lilly, Ipsen, and EMD Serono, and long position holdings in Natera and Exact Sciences. KLS is a member of the data and safety monitoring committee for the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center. JMJ declares consulting for Foundation Medicine. HP declares research grants or funding to their institution from Adlai Nortye USA, Alpine Immune Sciences, Ambrx, Amgen, Aprea Therapeutics, ArrayBioPharma, Bayer, BeiGene, BJ Bioscience, BMS, Daiichi Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Elicio Therapeutics, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Gossamer Bio, Hoffman-LaRoche, Hutchison MediPharma, ImmuneOncia Therapeutics, Incyte, Jounce Therapeutics, Mabspace Biosciences, MacroGenics, Medimmune, Medivation, Merck, Millennium, Mirati Therapeutics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Oncologie, Pfizer, PsiOxus Therapeutics, Puma Biotechnology, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, RePare Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Synermore Biologics, Taiho Pharmaceutical, TopAlliance Biosciences, TurningPoint Therapeutics, Vedanta Biosciences, and Xencor, and reimbursement for meetings or travel from Daiichi Sankyo and Vedanta. LCV declares consulting fees for Janssen, BMS, Takeda, Jazz, and Daiichi Sankyo. JLW declares research support from the NCI of the NIH. RHM declares research support from ViewRay and AstraZeneca; scientific advisory board participation for ViewRay and AstraZeneca; and expert witness fees from the US Attorney's Office Northern District of New York. MarMA has consulted for Genentech, BMS, Merck, AstraZeneca, Maverick, Blueprint Medicine, Syndax, Ariad/Takeda, Nektar, Gritstone, ArcherDX, Mirati, NextCure, Novartis, EMD Serono, and Panvaxal/NovaRx; declares research funding (to their institute) from AstraZeneca, Lilly, Genentech, BMS, and Merck; and declares participation on a data safety monitoring board and advisory board for BMS and Apollomics. SJR declares research support from BMS, Merck, Affimed, and KITE/Gilead, is on the Scientific Advisory Board of Immunitas Therapeutics, and has equity in Immunitas Therapeutics. AMM declares research support from Merck, BMS, Transgene, Incyte, Trisalus, Genentech, and the NIH; consulting fees from Zosano; advisory board participation for BMS, AstraZeneca, Incyte, and Dynavax; and stock options in MultiplexThera. CJW declares equity in BioNTech, U24 research support from the NCI of the NIH, and research funding from Pharmacyclics. FSH declares research support from the NCI of the NIH, BMS, Novartis, and Genentech; royalties or licenses from BMS and Novartis; consulting fees from BMS, EMD Serono, Surface, Sanofi, Genentech, Gossamer, Trillium, Immunocore, Merck, Novartis, Compass Therapeutics, Pieris, Bioentre, Iovance, Catalym, and Amgen; patents for the methods for treating MHC class I polypeptide-related sequence A disorders (number 20100111973; with royalties paid), tumour antigens and uses thereof (number 7250291; issued), angiopoiten-2 biomarkers predictive of anti-immune checkpoint response (number 20170248603; pending), compositions and methods for the identification, assessment, prevention, and treatment of melanoma using PD-L1 isoforms (number 20160340407; pending), therapeutic peptides (number 20160046716; pending), therapeutic peptides (number 20140004112; pending), therapeutic peptides (number 20170022275; pending), therapeutic peptides (number 20170008962; pending), therapeutic peptides (number 9402905; issued), methods of using pembrolizumab and trebananib (pending), vaccine compositions and methods for restoring NKG2D pathway function against cancers (number 10279021; issued), antibodies that bind to MHC class I polypeptide-related sequence A (number 10106611; issued), and anti-galectin antibody biomarkers predictive of anti-immune checkpoint and anti-angiogenesis responses (number 20170343552; pending); data safety monitoring board and advisory board participation for Aduro and Checkpoint Therapeutics; scientific advisory board leadership for Bicara and Apricity; and stock options in Checkpoint Therapeutics, Pionyr, Apricity, and Bicara. AL is currently an employee of Bristol Myers Squibb. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) often cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs), most of which are treated with corticosteroids despite evidence suggesting that corticosteroids may blunt antitumor efficacy. We sought to identify cytokine changes that correlate with irAEs and study the impact of corticosteroid treatment on cytokine levels., Methods: We analyzed expression of 34 cytokines in 52 melanoma patients who developed irAEs during therapy with ICIs. Luminex serum assay was performed at baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months after starting ICI. Baseline cytokine levels and longitudinal log 2 fold-change was compared with incidence and grade of irAEs. Cytokine patterns were compared between patients based on development of irAEs and steroid treatment., Results: There were no differences in baseline cytokine levels between patients who developed grade 1-2 irAEs (N = 28) vs. grade 3-4 irAEs (N = 24). Dermatitis patients (N = 8) had significantly higher baseline Ang-1 (p = 0.006) and CD40L (p = 0.005). Pneumonitis patients (N = 4) had significantly higher baseline IL-17 (p = 0.009). Colitis patients (N = 8) had a trend toward decreased GCSF (p = 0.08). Through Spearman's correlation analysis, patients who developed irAEs without receiving corticosteroids (N = 23) exhibited harmonization of cytokine fold-change, with 0/276 pairwise comparisons demonstrating significant divergence. In contrast, corticosteroid treatment in patients with irAEs (N = 15) altered fold-change to a discordant pattern (42/276 diverged, 15.2%). This discordant cytokine pattern in patients receiving corticosteroids is similar to the cytokine pattern in patients who did not develop irAEs (N = 8) during the longitudinal profiling period (41/276, 14.9%)., Conclusions: Baseline levels of certain cytokines correlate with specific irAEs in melanoma patients receiving ICIs. irAEs drive a concordant pattern of cytokine fold-change, which is disrupted by corticosteroid treatment., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.)

Mucosal melanoma is a rare form of melanoma which arises from melanocytes in the mucosal membranes and can be effectively treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). However, response rates in mucosal melanoma are lower than those observed for cutaneous melanomas. Targeted sequencing of up to 447 genes (OncoPanel) was performed on tumors from all mucosal melanoma patients seen at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from 2011 until March 2019. We identified a total of 46 patients who received ICB with both tumor-genotype and ICB response data available. Within this cohort of patients, 16 (35%) had durable clinical benefit (DCB) to their first line of ICB. The average mutational burden/megabase was 6.23 and did not correlate with tumor response to ICB. Patients with KIT aberrations had a higher DCB rate compared with patients with wildtype KIT (71 vs. 28%), but this was not found to be statistically significant. For comparison, we analyzed tumor genotypes from an additional 50 mucosal melanoma tumors and 189 cutaneous melanoma tumors. The most frequent mutations in mucosal melanoma were in SF3B1 (27%), KIT (18%), and NF1 (17%), a pattern that is distinct from cutaneous melanomas. In addition, there were genetic differences observed based upon the site of origin of the mucosal melanoma. Our findings explore clinical features of response in patients with mucosal melanoma treated with ICB and demonstrate a low mutational burden that does not correlate with response. In addition, the lack of significant association between the genetic aberrations tested and response to ICB indicates the need for further exploration in this patient population., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Despite the expansion of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) indications, the relationship between ICI dose and toxicity or response is not well established. To understand this correlation, we performed a meta-analysis of ICI trials that used dose escalation., Experimental Design: We searched PubMed and abstracts presented at (inter)national meetings for trials using FDA-approved ICIs. The reported rates of grade 3-5 adverse events (G3-5 AE), immune-related adverse events (irAE), and response were correlated with doses within each ICI using marginal exact generalized linear models., Results: A total of 74 trials (7,469 patients) published between January 2010 and January 2017 were included. For ipilimumab, the incidence of G3-5 AEs was 34% with a significant 27% reduced risk in lower doses ( P = 0.002). However, no relationship was observed between dose and irAEs or response. For nivolumab, the incidence of G3-5 AEs was 20.1% which was lower in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) or melanoma ( P ≤ 0.05) with no dose-toxicity relationship. In melanoma and NSCLC, a dose-response association was observed, which was not observed in RCC. For pembrolizumab, the incidence of G3-5 AEs was 13.3%, which was lower in melanoma compared with NSCLC ( P = 0.03) with no dose-toxicity relationship. In melanoma, lower dose levels correlated with decreased odds of response ( P = 0.01), a relationship that was not observed in NSCLC., Conclusions: Our analysis shows a lack of consistent dose-toxicity or dose-response correlation with ICIs. Therefore, dose escalation is not an appropriate design to conduct ICI studies. Here we present an innovative trial design for immune-modulating agents., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Immune-related colitis is a common, often serious complication of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). Although endoscopy is not strictly recommended for any grade of diarrhea/colitis, emerging evidence suggests that endoscopic evaluation may have important therapeutic implications. In this retrospective study, we sought to comprehensively characterize the clinical and histologic features of ICI-induced colitis with a specific focus on evaluating the prognostic role of endoscopy., Methods: Data were collected from the medical records of 130 patients with confirmed ICI-induced colitis. In a subset of patients (n=44) with endoscopic and pathologic data, endoscopic data were scored using the Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES) with scores ranging from 0 (no inflammation) to 3 (colonic ulceration). The impact of infliximab on antitumor outcomes was evaluated using progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: We identified 130 patients with ICI-induced colitis across two institutions. All patients were treated with corticosteroids. Additional and/or alternative immunosuppression was employed in 59 cases, with 52 patients (42%) requiring at least one infusion of infliximab 5 mg/kg. Endoscopic assessment with biopsy was performed in 123 cases of suspected colitis (95%), with 44 cases available for MES tabulation. Presence of ulceration (MES 3) was associated with use of infliximab (p=0.008) and MES was significantly higher in patients who received infliximab compared with those who did not (p=0.003) with a median score of 2.5; conversely, those with an MES of zero rarely required secondary immunosuppression. Notably, symptoms of colitis based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade had no association with endoscopic findings based on MES classification. After adjustment for baseline patient and disease characteristics, there was no significant difference in steroid duration or cancer-related outcomes in patients treated with infliximab., Conclusions: In our study, we demonstrate the association of endoscopic features, specifically the MES, with immunosuppressive needs. Importantly, we also show that MES was not related to severity of patient symptoms. The data suggest that endoscopic features can guide clinical decision-making better than patient symptoms, both identifying high-risk patients who will require infliximab and those who are likely to respond to initial corticosteroids., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

PurposeProspective human data are lacking regarding safety, efficacy, and immunologic impacts of different radiation doses administered with combined PD-L1/CTLA-4 blockade.Patients and methodsWe performed a multicenter phase II study randomly assigning patients with metastatic microsatellite stable colorectal cancer to repeated low-dose fractionated radiation (LDFRT) or hypofractionated radiation (HFRT) with PD-L1/CTLA-4 inhibition. The primary endpoint was response outside the radiation field. Correlative samples were analyzed using multiplex immunofluorescence (IF), IHC, RNA/T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing, cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF), and Olink.ResultsEighteen patients were evaluable for response. Median lines of prior therapy were four (range, 1-7). Sixteen patients demonstrated toxicity potentially related to treatment (84%), and 8 patients had grade 3-4 toxicity (42%). Best response was stable disease in 1 patient with out-of-field tumor shrinkage. Median overall survival was 3.8 months (90% confidence interval, 2.3-5.7 months). Correlative IF and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) revealed increased infiltration of CD8+ and CD8+/PD-1+/Ki-67+ T cells in the radiation field after HFRT. LDFRT increased foci of micronuclei/primary nuclear rupture in two subjects. CyTOF and RNA-seq demonstrated significant declines in multiple circulating immune populations, particularly in patients receiving HFRT. TCR sequencing revealed treatment-associated changes in T-cell repertoire in the tumor and peripheral blood.ConclusionsWe demonstrate the feasibility and safety of adding LDFRT and HFRT to PD-L1/CTLA-4 blockade. Although the best response of stable disease does not support the use of concurrent PD-L1/CTLA-4 inhibition with HFRT or LDFRT in this population, biomarkers provide support that both LDFRT and HFRT impact the local immune microenvironment and systemic immunogenicity that can help guide future studies.

Background: In the era of immune checkpoint blockade, the role of cancer vaccines in immune priming has provided additional potential for therapeutic improvements. Prior studies have demonstrated delayed type hypersensitivity and anti-tumor immunity with vaccines engineered to secrete granulocytemacrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). The safety, efficacy and antitumor immunity of GM-CSF secreting vaccine in patients with previously treated stage III or IV melanoma needs further investigation. Methods: In this phase II trial, excised lymph node metastases were processed to single cells, transduced with an adenoviral vector encoding GM-CSF, irradiated, and cryopreserved. Individual vaccines were composed of 1x106, 4x106, or 1x107 tumor cells, and were injected intradermally and subcutaneously at weekly and biweekly intervals. The primary endpoints were feasibility of producing vaccine in stage III patients and determining the proportion of patients alive at two years in stage IV patients. Results: GM-CSF vaccine was successfully developed and administered in all 61 patients. Toxicities were restricted to grade 1-2 local skin reactions. The median OS for stage III patients (n = 20) was 71.1 (95% CI, 43.7 to NR) months and 14.9 (95%CI, 12.1 to 39.7) months for stage IV patients. The median PFS in stage III patients was 50.7 (95%CI, 36.3 to NR) months and 4.1 (95% CI, 3.0-6.3) months in stage IV patients. In the overall population, the disease control rate was 39.3% (95%CI, 27.1 to 52.7%). In stage III patients, higher pre-treatment plasma cytokine levels of MMP-1, TRAIL, CXCL-11, CXCL-13 were associated with improved PFS (p<0.05 for all). An increase in post-vaccination levels of IL-15 and TRAIL for stage III patients was associated with improved PFS (p=0.03 for both). Similarly, an increase in post-vaccination IL-16 level for stage IV patients was associated with improved PFS (p=0.02) and clinical benefit. Conclusions: Vaccination with autologous melanoma cells secreting GM-CSF augments antitumor immunity in stage III and IV patients with melanoma, is safe, and demonstrates disease control. Luminex data suggests that changes in inflammatory cytokines and immune cell infiltration promote tumor antigen presentation and subsequent tumor cell destruction. Additional investigation to administer this vaccine in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Gastrointestinal immune‐related adverse events are frequently caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and often require interruption of cancer treatment. Compared with ICI colitis and enteritis, limited information exists about ICI gastritis. This study characterized clinical features and treatment outcomes of ICI gastritis. Methods: Consecutive cancer patients who received ICIs and underwent endoscopy with gastric biopsies while on ICIs from 2011 to 2021 were retrospectively assessed. Specific histopathologic features identified ICI gastritis. Results: Of 6450 ICI‐treated patients, 162 (2.5%) underwent endoscopy with gastric biopsies. ICI gastritis was identified in 54 (33%) biopsied patients; 38 (70%) had concurrent ICI enteritis/colitis and 16 (30%) had isolated ICI gastritis. Dyspepsia (38%) and bloating (25%) were the most frequent symptoms of isolated ICI gastritis. Compared with patients with concomitant enteritis/colitis, patients with isolated gastritis were less likely to have diarrhea (13% vs 68%; p <.001) or abdominal pain (19% vs 47%; p =.07). Patients with isolated ICI gastritis less frequently required glucocorticoids (69% vs 92%; p =.04) and had lower incidence of ICI hold/withdrawal (13% vs 42%; p =.06). There was no association between severity or extent of luminal inflammation and antitumor response (p =.85 and p =.44, respectively). Endoscopically, gastric mucosa appeared normal in 11 (20%) patients with biopsy‐proven ICI gastritis. Conclusion: ICI gastritis may present alone or more commonly with concurrent enteritis/colitis, which may differentiate its clinical course. Gastric biopsies are required to diagnose a substantial minority of endoscopically normal, clinically significant cases. Most patients with isolated gastritis can continue ICI therapy uninterrupted, but a notable proportion require glucocorticoids. Plain language summary: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective anticancer treatments, but can cause inflammatory toxicities, including of the stomach (gastritis), intestine, and colon. Limited information is available on gastritis triggered by these agents.Adult patients with cancer who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and had an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsies of the stomach were examined. More than two‐thirds (70%) of people with checkpoint inhibitor gastritis also had inflammatory changes of the small intestine and/or colon.Compared with patients with isolated checkpoint gastritis, the subgroup with concomitant enteritis/colitis more frequently had abdominal pain, diarrhea, needed steroids, and/or needed to pause or stop antitumor therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) gastritis frequently presents with concomitant enteritis/colitis, which differentiates its clinical presentation and management from patients with isolated gastric involvement. A substantial minority of ICI gastritis cases are diagnosed histologically despite normal endoscopic appearance, highlighting the importance of gastric biopsies in patients with suspicious symptoms of or risk factors for checkpoint inhibitor gastritis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) has dual roles in both the DNA damage response and in the innate immune response to genotoxic stress. The combination of CHK1 inhibition and immune checkpoint blockade has the potential to enhance anti-tumoral T-cell activation. Methods: This was an open-label phase 1 study evaluating the CHK1 inhibitor prexasertib and the anti-PD-L1 antibody LY3300054. After a lead-in of LY3300054 (Arm A), prexasertib (Arm B) or the combination (Arm C), both agents were administered intravenously at their respective recommended phase 2 doses (RP2Ds) on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Flow cytometry of peripheral blood was performed before and during treatment to analyze effects on immune cell populations, with a focus on T cell subsets and activation. Plasma cytokines and chemokines were analyzed using the Luminex platform. Results: Among seventeen patients enrolled, the combination was tolerable at the monotherapy RP2Ds, 105 mg/m2 prexasertib and 700 mg LY3300054. Dose-limiting toxicities included one episode each of febrile neutropenia (Arm C) and grade 4 neutropenia lasting > 5 days (Arm B). One patient had immune-related AST/ALT elevation after 12 cycles. Three patients with CCNE1-amplified, high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) achieved partial response (PR), 2 lasting > 12 months; a fourth such patient maintained stable disease > 12 months. Analysis of peripheral blood demonstrated evidence of CD8 + T-cell activation in response to treatment. Conclusions: Prexasertib in combination with PD-L1 blockade was tolerable and demonstrated preliminary activity in CCNE1-amplified HGSOC with evidence of cytotoxic T-cell activation in patient blood samples. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03495323. Registered April 12, 2018. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have minimal therapeutic effect in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. We present final overall survival (OS) results (n = 88) from a randomized phase 2 trial of eribulin ± pembrolizumab for patients with metastatic HR+ breast cancer, computationally dissect genomic and/or transcriptomic data from pre-treatment tumors (n = 52) for molecular associations with efficacy, and identify cytokine changes differentiating response and ICI-related toxicity (n = 58). Despite no improvement in OS with combination therapy (hazard ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.59–1.55, p = 0.84), immune infiltration and antigen presentation distinguished responding tumors, while tumor heterogeneity and estrogen signaling independently associated with resistance. Moreover, patients with ICI-related toxicity had lower levels of immunoregulatory cytokines. Broadly, we establish a framework for ICI response in HR+ breast cancer that warrants diagnostic and therapeutic validation. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT03051659. A randomized phase 2 clinical trial has recently shown no benefit of the combination eribulin and pembrolizumab over pembrolizumab alone in HR + metastatic breast cancer patients (NCT03051659). Here, the authors are reporting the final OS data and biomarker analyses on a subset of samples to analyze molecular correlates [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is a lack of predictive markers informing on the risk of colitis in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The aim of this study was to identify potential factors associated with development of ICI colitis.Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of melanoma patients at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute who received PD-1, CTLA-4, or combination ICIs between May 2011 to October 2017. Clinical and laboratory characteristics associated with pathologically confirmed ICI colitis were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analyses. External confirmation was performed on an independent cohort from Massachusetts General Hospital.Results: The discovery cohort included 213 patients of whom 37 developed ICI colitis (17%). Vitamin D use was recorded in 66/213 patients (31%) before starting ICIs. In multivariable regression analysis, vitamin D use conferred significantly reduced odds of developing ICI colitis (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.1-0.9). These results were also demonstrated in the confirmatory cohort (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.2-0.9) of 169 patients of whom 49 developed ICI colitis (29%). Pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥5 predicted reduced odds of colitis (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.1-0.9) only in the discovery cohort.Conclusions: This is the first study to report that among patients treated with ICIs, vitamin D intake is associated with reduced risk for ICI colitis. This finding is consistent with prior reports of prophylactic use of vitamin D in ulcerative colitis and graft-versus-host-disease. This observation should be validated prospectively in future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]