Search

Purpose: Intraoperative 3D imaging has become a valued tool in assessing the quality of reduction and implant placement in orthopedic trauma surgery. In our institution, 3D imaging is used routinely since 2001. To evaluate the intraoperative findings and consequences of this technique, intraoperative revision rates in cases with 3D imaging were analyzed., Methods: All operative procedures carried out with intraoperative 3D imaging between August 2001 and December 2016 were included. The scans were assessed intraoperatively and documented thereafter. In case of malreduction or misplaced implants, an immediate revision was performed. The number of scans per case as well as the findings and consequences drawn regarding the anatomical region were analyzed., Results: 4721 cases with 7201 3D scans were included in this study. The most common anatomical regions were the ankle (22.3%), the calcaneus (14.8%) and the tibial head (9.5%). In 19.1% of all cases, an intraoperative revision was performed. The highest revision rates were found with 36.0% in calcaneal fractures, 24.8% in fractures of the tibial plateau, 22.3% in injuries of the ankle. In 52.0% of revisions, the reduction was improved regarding intra-articular steps or joint congruency. In 30.5% an implant was corrected., Conclusion: Intraoperative revision due to results of 3D imaging was performed in almost one-fifth of cases. This illustrates the improved possibilities to detect malreduction and implant misplacements intraoperatively and thus the abilities to improve surgical outcome., Level of Evidence: III., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Intraoperative imaging is regularly used for intraoperative reduction control and evaluation of the implant position in trauma surgery. 2D imaging is limited, especially in complex anatomical regions such as the pelvis. The introduction of mobile 3D C-arms (CBCT: cone-beam computed tomography) has significantly improved intraoperative assessment. Nevertheless, there are still limitations regarding the field of view and metal artifacts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) in surgical treatment of sacroiliac (SI) injuries., Methods: Twenty-five cases with injuries of the posterior pelvic ring involving the SI region that were surgically treated with navigated SI screws using the mobile iCT Airo (Brainlab, Munich, Germany) were analysed. Subsequently, the data were compared with historical control groups (CBCT with and without navigation; 2D fluoroscopy only)., Results: The average score for subjective image quality achieved using the Likert scale is significantly higher for the iCT (4.48 ± 0.65) than for the CBCT (3.04 ± 0.69) with p = 0.00. The average duration of surgery using iCT was 189.32 ± 88.64 min, which was not significantly different from the control groups (p = 0.14 - 0.70). The average fluoroscopy time using iCT was 81.96 ± 97.34 s, which was significantly shorter than in all of the control groups (p = 0.00 - 0.03). The rate for postoperatively detected complications after using iCT was 0% (n = 0). Compared with the 2D-only control group (25%; n = 1), there is a significant difference (p = 0.01). The remaining two control groups showed no significant differences (p = 0.09 - 0.19)., Conclusions: The iCT provides excellent image quality that allows reliable assessment of fracture reduction and implant placement even in complex anatomical regions. The radiation exposure for the medical staff is reduced by decreasing the fluoroscopy time without significantly prolonging the surgical time. Overall, the possibility of intraoperative correction improves clinical outcome and patient treatment in the long term., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Holger Keil is a paid lecturer for the Brainlab AG (Munich, Germany). This cooperation influenced neither the outcome of the study nor the manuscript., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

The aim of our study was to evaluate whether software-based artifact reduction can achieve an improved image quality, using intraoperative 3D imaging in spinal surgery. A total of 49 intraoperative 3D image datasets of patients, who underwent surgery with pedicle screw placement, were retrospectively evaluated. The visibility of anatomical structures and the diameter of the pedicle screws were examined, with and without the application of the artifact reduction software. All software prototypes can improve the visibility of anatomical structures (P < 0.01), except MAR (metal artifact reduction) combined with IRIS (iterative reconstruction in image space) (P = 0.04). The algorithms MAR and MAR-2 can reduce the blooming artifacts significantly (P < 0.01), but SL (Shepp & Logan) cannot (P = 0.08-0.988). In summary, software-based artifact reduction for intraoperative 3D datasets can improve the current image quality. Additional information regarding the implant placement and the fracture reduction is therefore generated for the surgeon.

Anatomic reconstruction of articular fractures is one of the critical factors in later achieving good functional outcome. Intraoperative 3D imaging has been shown to offer better evaluation and therefore can significantly improve the results. The purpose of this study was to assess the difference between intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy (3D) and intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) imaging regarding fracture reduction, implant placement and articular impressions in a distal humeral fracture model. AO type 13-B2 fracture pattern were created in upper extremity cadaver specimens. Articular step-offs, intra-articular screw placement and intraarticular impressions of different degrees of severity were created. All specimens had imaging performed. For each articular pattern 3D fluoroscopy in standard (3Ds) and high quality (3Dh) were performed (Arcadis Orbic, Siemens, Germany) as well as an intraoperative CT scan (iCT, Airo, Brainlab, Germany). Three observers evaluated all imaging studies regarding subjective and objective parameters. iCT is more precise than 3D fluoroscopic imaging for detection of articular impressions. Articular step-offs and intraarticular screw placement are similar for iCT and 3D. Subjective imaging quality is the highest for iCT and lowest for 3Ds. Intraoperative CT may be particularly useful in assessing articular impressions and providing a good subjective image quality for the surgeon.

Purpose: Fracture reduction and fixation of syndesmotic injuries is a common procedure in trauma surgery. An intra-operative evaluation of the surgical outcome is challenging due to high inter-individual anatomical variation. A comparison to the contralateral uninjured ankle would be highly beneficial but would also incur additional radiation and time consumption. In this work, we pioneer automatic contralateral side comparison while avoiding an additional 3D scan., Methods: We reconstruct an accurate 3D surface of the uninjured ankle joint from three low-dose 2D fluoroscopic projections. Through CNN complemented 3D shape model segmentation, we create a reference model of the injured ankle while addressing the issues of metal artifacts and initialization. Following 2D-3D multiple bone reconstruction, a final reference contour can be created and matched to the uninjured ankle for contralateral side comparison without any user interaction., Results: The accuracy and robustness of individual workflow steps were assessed using 81 C-arm datasets, with 2D and 3D images available for injured and uninjured ankles. Furthermore, the entire workflow was tested on eleven clinical cases. These experiments showed an overall average Hausdorff distance of [Formula: see text] mm measured at clinical evaluation level., Conclusion: Reference contours of the contralateral side reconstructed from three projection images can assist surgeons in optimizing reduction results, reducing the duration of radiation exposure and potentially improving postoperative outcomes in the long term.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the intraoperative revision rate and reasons for revision following 3D imaging in the management of dislocated articular tibial plateau fractures based on a large patient sample., Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation due type B or C tibial plateau fracture according to the AO/OTA classification between August 2001 and December 2017 using intraoperative cone beam CT (3D imaging) for the analysis of fracture reduction and implant placement. The findings of the 3D scan were categorized regarding the amount and type of revision. Furthermore, demographic data was examined., Results: Five hundred and fifty-nine consecutive fractures were included in the study. Evaluation of the image data records revealed an intraoperative revision due to the usage of 3D imaging in 148 out of 559 cases (26.5%). The most common reasons for an intraoperative revision were insufficient fracture reduction (114 cases) and screw length (21 cases)., Conclusion: This study reveals indications for a limited analysis of fracture reduction and implant placement during the operative treatment of dislocated articular tibial plateau fractures using conventional fluoroscopy. In view of the high revision rate during open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures due to 3D imaging the usage of intraoperative cone beam, CT may be considered. If this is not possible, a postoperative computed tomography may therefore be reasonable.

Introduction: In operative treatment of distal radius fractures satisfying outcome mainly relies on anatomical fracture reduction and correct implant placement. Examination with two-dimensional fluoroscopy may not provide reliable information about this. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of additional intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in the operative treatment of comminuted distal radius fractures., Materials and Methods: From August 2001 to June 2015, patients with a distal radius fracture who were treated operatively and received intraoperative three-dimensional scan were included. The findings of the three-dimensional scan were documented by the operative surgeon and analyzed retrospectively with regard to incidence and the need for intraoperative revisions. Clinical evaluation included the patient's medical history, the injury pattern of the affected wrist (according to the OTA/AO fracture classification) and concomitant injuries. Intraoperative and postoperative complications and revision surgeries were evaluated as well., Results: Of 4515 operatively treated distal radius fractures, 307 (6.8%) received additional intraoperative three-dimensional imaging during surgery. 263 of 307 patients (85.7%) had a distal radius fracture type C. Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging revealed findings in 125 patients (40.7%) that were not detected on conventional two-dimensional fluoroscopy. In 54 patients (17.6%) these findings led to an immediate revision. Most commonly, revision was done in the case of remaining steps in the articular surface ≥ 1 mm (n = 25, 8.1%) followed by intra-articular screw placement (n = 23, 7.5%)., Conclusions: Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging can provide additional information compared to conventional two-dimensional fluoroscopy in the operative treatment of distal radius fractures with the possibility of immediate intraoperative revision.

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) imaging with a mobile C-arm has proven to be a valuable intraoperative tool in trauma surgery. However, little data is available concerning its use in the treatment of elbow fractures. The aim of the current study was to determine the intraoperative findings and consequences of 3D imaging in the treatment of elbow fractures., Methods: Between 2001 and 2015, prospectively collected data of 36 patients who underwent intraoperative 3D imaging during elbow surgery were recorded. The findings and consequences of the intraoperative 3D scans were analyzed in a retrospective chart review. For clinical evaluation the analysis included the patients' medical history, the injury pattern of the affected elbow and concomitant injuries. Intraoperative and postoperative complications and revision surgeries were evaluated as well., Results: In 6 patients (16.7%) analysis of the intraoperative 3D scan led to an immediate revision due to the detection of intra-articular screw placement (n = 3, 8.3%) and remaining intra-articular step of >2 mm (n = 3, 8.3%). In all of these patients, correct implant positioning and anatomical reduction could be achieved after immediate intraoperative revision, which was verified by a repeated intraoperative 3D scan. None of the 36 patients needed surgical revision based on postoperative radiological examinations due to secondary dislocation, wrong implant placement or remaining steps in the articular surface., Conclusions: Intraoperative 3D imaging offers additional information about fracture reduction and implant positioning in the treatment of elbow fractures compared to conventional intraoperative 2D imaging. It may therefore reduce the need for revision surgery. The value of intraoperative 3D imaging for clinical outcomes still needs to be assessed.