Search

Image storage, display, and distribution have been difficult problems in radiology for many years. As improvements in technology have changed the nature of the storage and display media, demand for image portability, faster image acquisition, and flexible image distribution is driving the development of responsive systems. Technology, such as the wavelet-based multiresolution seamless image database (MrSID) portable image format (PIF), is enabling image management solutions that address the shifting "point-of-care." The MrSID PIF employs seamless, multiresolution technology, which allows the viewer to determine the size of the image to be viewed, as well as the position of the viewing area within the image dataset. In addition the MrSID PIF allows control of the compression ratio of decompressed images. This capability offers the advantage of very rapid image recall from storage devices and portability for rapid transmission and distribution using the internet or wide-area networks. For example, in teleradiology, the radiologist or other physician desiring to view images at a remote location has full flexibility in being able to choose a quick display of an overview image, a complete display of a full diagnostic quality image, or both without compromising communication bandwidth. The MrSID algorithm will satisfy Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) 2000 standards, thereby being compatible with future versions of the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard for image data compression.

In recent years there have been many significant developments in the ability to process radiographic pictures and transfer the images from one location to another, and we can now examine the application of computers in the radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis. Image management and communication systems can assist in providing better health care while lowering costs. Although this work is still in its infancy, the rapid growth in both hardware capability and software techniques will soon make these techniques available to physicians everywhere. The expanding capability in the commercial world is being embraced by the radiology department, and will soon allow rheumatologists to access images at greater distances, and do more with the images which become available.

Rationale and Objectives: The compression of cranial computed tomography scans was improved by using independent intra- and interframe compression techniques., Methods: For intraframe compression, an image was decomposed into four subimages, one subimage was chosen as a reference subimage, and three of the subimages were predicted from the reference subimage. The prediction error was encoded with a classified vector quantizer (CVQ) based on human visual perception characteristics. Interframe redundancy is exploited by a displacement estimated interslice (DEI) algorithm that encodes the differences between reference subimages from adjacent slices. This combined DEI/CVQ method was subjectively evaluated by 13 radiologists under a blinded protocol, and was compared to the CVQ method alone, the DEI method alone, the original images, and to a standard intraframe discrete cosine transform (DCT) compression method., Results: Only the combined DEI/CVQ method at 10:1 compression was not scored significantly different from the original images. At 15:1 compression, the DEI/CVQ method was scored significantly better than the 10:1 DCT and any other 15:1 compression methods., Conclusions: Compressed image quality is enhanced by exploiting inter- and intraframe redundancy, and by modeling some characteristics of human visual perception. The DEI/CVQ method is well-suited for progressive transmission, and thus, holds potential in teleradiology as well as picture archiving and communications systems.

This is the fourth article of our series for radiologists and imaging scientists on displaying, manipulating, and analyzing radiologic images on personal computers. Classic image processing is divided into point, area, frame, and geometric processes. Point processes change image pixel values based on the value of the pixel of interest. Histogram equalization adjusts the pixel values in the image based on the distribution of pixel values. Area processes change the pixel of interest based on the values of the surrounding pixels, known as the neighborhood. Area processes using a convolution kernel are often used as image filters. Common convolution kernels include low-frequency, high-frequency, and edge-enhancement filters. Edge enhancement can be performed with convolution kernels such as shift and difference, gradient-directional and Laplacian filters, or with nonlinear methods such as Sobel's algorithm. Frame processes mathematically combine two or more images, often for noise reduction and background subtraction. Geometric processes alter the location of pixels within the image, but usually not the pixel values. Common radiologic applications of image processing include window width and window level adjustments (point process), adaptive histogram equalization (area process), unsharp masking (area process), computed radiography image processing (combined area and point processes), digital subtraction angiography (frame and geometric processes), region of interest analysis (area process), and image rotation (geometric process). As digital imaging becomes more widespread, radiologists need to understand the image processing that is fundamental to these modalities.

This is part 2 of our article on image storage and compression, the third article of our series for radiologists and imaging scientists on displaying, manipulating, and analyzing radiologic images on personal computers. Image compression is classified as lossless (nondestructive) or lossy (destructive). Common lossless compression algorithms include variable-length bit codes (Huffman codes and variants), dictionary-based compression (Lempel-Ziv variants), and arithmetic coding. Huffman codes and the Lempel-Ziv-Welch (LZW) algorithm are commonly used for image compression. All of these compression methods are enhanced if the image has been transformed into a differential image based on a differential pulse-code modulation (DPCM) algorithm. The LZW compression after the DPCM image transformation performed the best on our example images, and performed almost as well as the best of the three commercial compression programs tested. Lossy compression techniques are capable of much higher data compression, but reduced image quality and compression artifacts may be noticeable. Lossy compression is comprised of three steps: transformation, quantization, and coding. Two commonly used transformation methods are the discrete cosine transformation and discrete wavelet transformation. In both methods, most of the image information is contained in a relatively few of the transformation coefficients. The quantization step reduces many of the lower order coefficients to 0, which greatly improves the efficiency of the coding (compression) step. In fractal-based image compression, image patterns are stored as equations that can be reconstructed at different levels of resolution.

This is the third article of our series for radiologists and imaging scientists on displaying, manipulating, and analyzing radiologic images on personal computers. Part 1 of this article discusses image storage and reviews the basic concepts of information theory and image compression; part 2 will discuss specific methods of image compression. There are a wide variety of removable storage devices available to users who need to archive radiologic images on their personal computers. Tape drives have potentially very large storage capacity but slow performance. Removable SyQuest (SyQuest Technology, Femont, CA) and Bernoulli disks have near hard disk performance and can store from 100 to 150 Mbytes. Magneto-optical drives can store nearly 1 Gb on a 5.25" disk, with somewhat slower performance. Selecting the most appropriate storage solution requires a careful balance of the user's requirements, including performance, storage needs, cost and compatibility with other users. Despite the advances in low cost high capacity storage technology, image compression remains a crucial technology for modern diagnostic radiology because digital images require such large amounts of storage. Image compression is possible because radiologic images have relatively low entropy (high information content) compared with random noise. Image compression is classified as lossless (nondestructive) or lossy (destructive). Lossless image compression commonly achieve compression ratios of 1.5:1 to 3:1 (33% to 67%), whereas lossy compression can compresses images from 3:1 to 30:1 (67% to 97%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This series of articles will explore the issue related to displaying, manipulating, and analyzing radiological images on personal computers (PC). This first article discusses the digital image data file, standard PC graphic file formats, and various methods for importing radiological images into the PC.

A digital radiography system based on reusable, photostimulable phosphor technology was evaluated in approximately 3,500 portable chest radiographs of patients in an intensive care unit. The system functioned well in this application. No major problems were encountered in the visualization of tubes or catheters or in the detection of pneumothoraces. Assessment of fluid volume status or the presence of small pleural effusions, especially when these were bilateral, was initially somewhat difficult but became easier as investigators became familiar with the system. Radiologists were quicker than nonradiologists to accept the minimized two-on-one display format. Critical evaluation of the overall performance of digital systems such as this one is needed for a better definition of the system's strengths and weaknesses. Specifically, statistical analyses of the ability to detect disease states such as pneumothoraces, interstitial lung disease, lung nodules, and pleural abnormalities need to be performed.