Search

Background: The initiation of metformin in early pregnancy in Gestational Diabetes mellitus (GDM) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to assess the influence of Metformin on maternal and fetal outcomes when initiated within the first trimester of pregnancy in GDM., Methods and Materials: A retrospective analysis of 540 women with diabetes complicating pregnancy (IADPSG criteria) over five years (January 2011 to May 2016) was done. The study population comprised of patients initiated on (a) metformin within the first trimester (Group A:n = 186), (b) metformin after the first trimester (Group B:n = 203) and (c) insulin at any time during their pregnancy (Group C:n = 151). The primary outcomes compared were prematurity, respiratory distress, birth trauma, 5-min APGAR score, neonatal hypoglycaemia and need for phototherapy, while secondary outcomes compared were neonatal anthropometric measurements, maternal glycemic control, maternal hypertensive complications, postpartum glucose tolerance., Results: Individual and composite primary or secondary outcomes in group A were similar to Groups B and C, though numerically higher premature births were seen in Group A. There was a 1.3% overall incidence of stillbirths/IUD, while 1.11% congenital anomalies were noted of which 2.15% were in group A and 1.32% were in Group C (p = .16)., Conclusions: The initiation of metformin within the first trimester of pregnancy has no significant adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. However, vigilance for premature births is recommended in women exposed to metformin in early pregnancy., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Two oral hypoglycaemic agents, metformin and glibenclamide, have been compared with insulin in separate large randomised controlled trials and have been found to be as effective as insulin in gestational diabetes. However, very few trials have compared metformin with glibenclamide., Materials and Methods: Of 159 South Indian women with fasting glucose ≥5.5 mmol/l and ≤7.2 mmol/l and/or 2-h post-prandial value ≥6.7 mmol/l and ≤13.9 mmol/l after medical nutritional therapy consented to be randomised to receive either glibenclamide or metformin. 80 women received glibenclamide and 79 received metformin. Neonatal outcomes were assessed by neonatologists who were unaware that the mother was part of a study and were recorded by assessors blinded to the medication the mother was given. The primary outcome was a composite of neonatal outcomes namely macrosomia, hypoglycaemia, need for phototherapy, respiratory distress, stillbirth or neonatal death and birth trauma. Secondary outcomes were birthweight, maternal glycaemic control, pregnancy induced hypertension, preterm birth, need for induction of labour, mode of delivery and complications of delivery., Results: Baseline characteristics were similar but for the higher fasting triglyceride levels in women on metformin. The primary outcome was seen in 35% of the glibenclamide group and 18.9% of the metformin group [95% CI 16.1 (2.5, 29.7); P = 0.02]. The difference in outcome related to a higher rate of neonatal hypoglycaemia in the glibenclamide group (12.5%) versus none in the metformin group [95% CI 12.5(5.3, 19.7); P = 0.001]. Secondary outcomes in both groups were similar., Conclusion: In a south Indian population with gestational diabetes, metformin was associated with better neonatal outcomes than glibenclamide., (© 2015 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.)

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of glyburide in preventing complications of gestational diabetes in neonates as compared to insulin., Materials and Methods: Information from birth register, maternal and neonatal records were obtained. Five hundred and seventy-seven gestational diabetics with moderate hyperglycemia i.e., with highest fasting plasma glucose value of ≤130 mg/dl and/or highest post-prandial value of ≤250 mg/dl treated with insulin or glyburide were included from a cohort of 769 women needing additional therapy to initial diet therapy during a 5-year period. Thus neonatal outcomes of 303 women treated with insulin and 274 women treated with glyburide were compared., Results: Baseline plasma glucose levels in the group treated with insulin were higher. The mean birth weight (SD) of the neonates in women treated with insulin was 3021.3 g (604.19) as compared to 3104.6 g (499.35, P = 0.07) in the group treated with glyburide. Neonatal outcomes such as hypoglycemia (4.9%, 3.6%, P = 0.44), hypocalcemia (1.3%, 0.7%, P = 0.48), polycythemia (1.7%, 0.7%, P = 0.31), macrosomia (11.6%, 8.7%, P = 0.26), congenital anomalies (2.1%, 2.3%, P = 0.87), birth trauma (1.4%, 1.2%, P = 0.79) were similar in both groups. Neonates of women treated with insulin were more likely to have hyperbilirubinemia (11.5%, 6.5%, P = 0.03)., Conclusion: Neonatal outcomes of women treated with glyburide were comparable to those in women treated with insulin. More number of neonates of mothers treated with insulin had hyperbilirubinemia compared to neonates of mothers treated with glyburide (11.5%, 6.5% P = 0.03).