Search

The kidney is an insulin-sensitive organ involved in glucose homeostasis. One major effect of insulin is to induce glycogen storage in the liver and muscle. However, no significant glycogen stores are detected in normal kidneys, but diabetic subjects present a characteristic renal histopathological feature resulting from extensive glycogen deposition mostly in nonproximal tubules. The mechanism of renal glycogen accumulation is yet poorly understood. Here, we studied in situ glycogen accumulation in the kidney from diabetic IRS2-knockout mice and the effect of the insulin-mimetic agent sodium tungstate (NaW). IRS2-knockout mice displayed hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia. NaW only normalized glycemia. There was no evident morphological difference between kidneys from untreated wild-type (WT), NaW-treated WT, and untreated IRS2-knockout mice. However, NaW-treated IRS2-knockout mice showed tubular alterations resembling clear cells in the cortex, but not in the outer medulla, that were correlated with glycogen accumulation. Immunohistochemical detection of the gluconeogenic enzyme phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, mostly expressed by renal proximal tubules, showed that altered tubules were of proximal origin. Our preliminary study suggests that IRS2 differentially regulates glycogen accumulation in renal tubules and that NaW treatment in the context of IRS2 ablation induces abnormal glycogen accumulation in cortical proximal tubules.

Aims: This analysis aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in combination therapy in <65 y.o. patients, overweight/obese, and with uncontrolled T2DM., Methods: Pooled analysis from three phase-III trials, in <65 y.o. patients, with BMI 25-35kg/m 2 , and HbA1c ≥8% at baseline. Patients (N=439) were randomized to placebo (n=138), empagliflozin 10mg (n=160), or empagliflozin 25mg (n=141) once daily (24weeks) as add-on to metformin, to metformin plus sulfonylurea, or to pioglitazone ± metformin., Results: At week 24, adjusted mean (SE) changes from baseline in HbA1c were -0.19% (0.07) for placebo vs. -1.10% (0.07) and -1.10% (0.07) for empagliflozin 10 and 25mg, respectively (both p<0.001). Adjusted mean (SE) changes from baseline in weight were -0.33kg (0.21) for placebo vs. -1.94kg (0.19) and -2.14kg (0.20) for empagliflozin 10 and 25mg, respectively (both p<0.001). Adverse events were reported in 57.2% on placebo, 64.4% on empagliflozin 10mg and 59.6% on empagliflozin 25mg. Genital infection AEs were reported in 1.4% on placebo, 3.8% on empagliflozin 10mg, and 5.0% on empagliflozin 25mg., Conclusions: In this specific population, empagliflozin in combination with other oral agents, significantly reduced HbA1c and body weight and was well tolerated., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study evaluated the impact of an Internet-based telematic system on the economic and clinical management of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus., Research Design and Methods: This 6-month prospective, randomized, comparative, open, multicenter study included patients with type 1 diabetes >18 years old treated with multiple insulin doses and with a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level of >8%. We compared an intervention group (IG) (two face-to-face and five telematic appointments) with a control group (CG) (seven face-to-face appointments). The variables studied were (1) patient and healthcare team costs, (2) metabolic control, (3) knowledge of diabetes, (4) quality of life, and (5) self-care treatment adherence., Results: Of the 154 patients included, 118 (76.6%) completed the study (IG, 54; CG, 64). The time used by the CG to follow the program was 823±645 min versus 353±222 min in the IG (P<0.0001). Compared with the CG, the IG required less healthcare time from the professionals (288±105 min vs. 232±89 min; P<0.001). HbA1c improved in both groups (IG, 9.2±1.5% [77.0±17.0 mmol/mol] vs. 8.7±1.5% [71.6±17.0 mmol/mol] [P<0.001]; CG, 9.2±0.9% [77.0±10.0 mmol/mol] vs. 8.6±0.9% [70.5±10.0 mmol/mol] [P<0.001], as did knowledge and self-care treatment adherence., Conclusions: The use of interactive telematic appointments in subjects with type 1 diabetes and inadequate metabolic control is an efficient strategy, providing results comparable to those of face-to-face appointments in relation to improvement in glycemic control, knowledge acquisition, and self-care treatment adherence, with a significant reduction in the time used, especially by patients.

Pancreatic β-cells play a central role in type 2 diabetes (T2D) development, which is characterized by the progressive decline of the functional β-cell mass that is associated mainly with increased β-cell apoptosis. Thus, understanding how to enhance survival of β-cells is key for the management of T2D. The insulin receptor substrate-2 (IRS-2) protein is pivotal in mediating the insulin/IGF signaling pathway in β-cells. In fact, IRS-2 is critically required for β-cell compensation in conditions of increased insulin demand and for β-cell survival. Tungstate is a powerful antidiabetic agent that has been shown to promote β-cell recovery in toxin-induced diabetic rodent models. In this study, we investigated whether tungstate could prevent the onset of diabetes in a scenario of dysregulated insulin/IGF signaling and massive β-cell death. To this end, we treated mice deficient in IRS2 (Irs2(-/-)), which exhibit severe β-cell loss, with tungstate for 3 wk. Tungstate normalized glucose tolerance in Irs2(-/-) mice in correlation with increased β-cell mass, increased β-cell replication, and a striking threefold reduction in β-cell apoptosis. Islets from treated Irs2(-/-) exhibited increased phosphorylated Erk1/2. Interestingly, tungstate repressed apoptosis-related genes in Irs2(-/-) islets in vitro, and ERK1/2 blockade abolished some of these effects. Gene expression profiling showed evidence of a broad impact of tungstate on cell death pathways in islets from Irs2(-/-) mice, consistent with reduced apoptotic rates. Our results support the finding that β-cell death can be arrested in the absence of IRS2 and that therapies aimed at reversing β-cell mass decline are potential strategies to prevent the progression to T2D.

Introduction and Objectives: To assess the patterns of use of 8 therapeutic drug groups for the treatment of diabetes mellitus and other cardiovascular risk factors, and to identify sociodemographic and health determinants of their use in the overall Spanish population., Methods: A representative sample of the Spanish population within the Di@bet.es study, a cross-sectional population-based survey, was included., Study Variables: sociodemographic, clinical, and lifestyle data; physical examination, and an oral glucose tolerance test in patients without known diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, patients were systematically queried about current medication use, and 8 pharmacotherapeutic groups were evaluated: lipid-lowering therapy, antihypertensives, oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin, thyroid hormone, uricosurics, psychoactive drugs, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs., Results: Sixty-six percent of the Spanish population was taking at least one medication. Therapeutic drug use was associated with age, independently of the higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia in older patients. Sex disparities were found in the use of lipid-lowering agents, allopurinol, levothyroxine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and psychoactive drugs. Use of psychoactive drugs was related to education level, work status, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol consumption. Almost 30% of patients with diabetes mellitus were taking 6 or more medications daily. Diabetes mellitus was associated with greater use of antihypertensives, lipid-lowering agents, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs., Conclusions: Age and sex are the most important factors determining therapeutic drug use. Lifestyle patterns and sociocultural factors have an impact only on psychoactive drug use. Diabetes mellitus is associated with greater use of antihypertensives, lipid-lowering agents, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs., (Copyright © 2013 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of linagliptin or placebo administered for 24 weeks in combination with pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) exhibiting insufficient glycaemic control (HbA1c 7.5-11.0%)., Methods: Patients were randomized to receive the initial combination of 30 mg pioglitazone plus 5 mg linagliptin (n = 259) or pioglitazone plus placebo (n = 130), all once daily. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c after 24 weeks of treatment, adjusted for baseline HbA1c and prior antidiabetes medication., Results: After 24 weeks of treatment, the adjusted mean change (±s.e.) in HbA1c with the initial combination of linagliptin plus pioglitazone was -1.06% (±0.06), compared with -0.56% (±0.09) for placebo plus pioglitazone. The difference in adjusted mean HbA1c in the linagliptin group compared with placebo was -0.51% (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.71, -0.30; p < 0.0001). Reductions in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were significantly greater for linagliptin plus pioglitazone than with placebo plus pioglitazone; -1.8 and -1.0 mmol/l, respectively, equating to a treatment difference of -0.8 mmol/l (95% CI -1.2, -0.4; p < 0.0001). Patients taking linagliptin plus pioglitazone, compared with those receiving placebo plus pioglitazone, were more likely to achieve HbA1c of <7.0% (42.9 vs. 30.5%, respectively; p = 0.0051) and reduction in HbA1c of ≥0.5% (75.0 vs. 50.8%, respectively; p < 0.0001). β-cell function, exemplified by the ratio of relative change in adjusted mean HOMA-IR and disposition index, improved. The proportion of patients that experienced at least one adverse event was similar for both groups. Hypoglycaemic episodes (all mild) occurred in 1.2% of the linagliptin plus pioglitazone patients and none in the placebo plus pioglitazone group., Conclusion: Initial combination therapy with linagliptin plus pioglitazone was well tolerated and produced significant and clinically meaningful improvements in glycaemic control. This combination may offer a valuable additive initial treatment option for T2DM, particularly where metformin either is not well tolerated or is contraindicated, such as in patients with renal impairment., (© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Objectives: Primary aim: to determine the degree of control of HbA(1c) at the time of treatment intensification (TI) in T2DM patients. Secondary aims: fasting plasma glucose levels; estimation of the elapsed time between HbA(1c) exceeding 7% and TI; antidiabetic combinations used, % patients with good cardiometabolic control (LDL-c<100mg/dL; SBP<130 and DPB<80mmHg and HbA(1c)<7%)., Research Design and Methods: one-cohort, multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted in Spain. Patients diagnosed with T2DM that had switched from monotherapy to combination antidiabetic therapy were evaluated at baseline and after one year of follow-up., Results: a total of 1202 T2DM patients were analyzed. At the time of TI: mean HbA(1c) 8.1%; median time of uncontrolled disease: 2.0 years. After one-year of TI: significant reduction in mean HbA(1c) (8.1% vs.7.0%, p<0.001) and a mean fasting plasma glucose levels reduction (181.1mg/dL vs.144.1mg/dL, p<0.001) was also observed. The percentage of patients under glycemic control (HbA(1c)<7%) increased from 12.2% to 51.6% (p<0.001). Most common antidiabetic combinations: metformin+sulfonylurea (44.1%) and metformin+thiazolidindione (15.9%)., Conclusions: in the population of T2DM patients analyzed, TI was carried out when HbA(1c) values were above those recommended in clinical guidelines (≤ 7%), with a delay of two years to address the second step of therapy, despite the consensus recommendation of the ADA/EASD of 3 months. TI was shown to be effective since addition of a second antidiabetic drug led to an average reduction of HbA(1c) of approximately 1%. Metformin was the drug most commonly used as monotherapy being the most frequent combination metformin+sulfonylurea., (2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Thiazolidinediones are insulin sensitizers, and are associated with fluid retention and increased risk of heart failure (HF) in people with type 2 diabetes. We assessed fatal and non-fatal HF events and their outcome, and identified HF predictors in the RECORD (Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of glycaemia in Diabetes) trial population., Methods and Results: In a multicentre, open-label study, we randomized 4447 people with type 2 diabetes on metformin or sulfonylurea monotherapy with a mean HbA(1c) of 7.9% to add-on rosiglitazone (n = 2220) or to a combination of metformin and sulfonylurea (n = 2227) and followed them over 5.5 years on average. Heart failure hospitalizations and deaths were adjudicated by a Clinical Endpoint Committee using pre-specified criteria. Independent predictors of HF events were identified out of a group of 30 pre-specified clinical, demographic, and biological variables. In the rosiglitazone group, the risk of HF death or hospitalization was doubled: HR = 2.10 (95% CI, 1.35-3.27): the excess HF event rate was 2.6 (1.1-4.1) per 1000 person-years. An excess in HF deaths was observed (10 vs. two), including four HF deaths as first HF events. By contrast, there was no increase in cardiovascular mortality or hospitalization (HR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.85-1.16) or in cardiovascular deaths (60 vs. 71). Independent predictors of HF were rosiglitazone assignment, age, urinary albumin : creatinine ratio, body mass index, and systolic blood pressure at baseline. A history of previous cardiovascular disease was not predictive of HF. Duration of HF hospitalization and rate of HF re-hospitalization were similar in the two groups., Conclusion: These findings confirm the increased risk of HF events in people treated with rosiglitazone and support the recommendation that this agent should not continue to be used in people developing symptomatic HF while using the medication. Close follow-up for the risk of HF should be offered to elderly people, people with markedly increased body mass index, people with microalbuminuria/proteinuria, and people with increased systolic blood pressure.

Background: Rosiglitazone is an insulin sensitiser used in combination with metformin, a sulfonylurea, or both, for lowering blood glucose in people with type 2 diabetes. We assessed cardiovascular outcomes after addition of rosiglitazone to either metformin or sulfonylurea compared with the combination of the two over 5-7 years of follow-up. We also assessed comparative safety., Methods: In a multicentre, open-label trial, 4447 patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin or sulfonylurea monotherapy with mean haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) of 7.9% were randomly assigned to addition of rosiglitazone (n=2220) or to a combination of metformin and sulfonylurea (active control group, n=2227). The primary endpoint was cardiovascular hospitalisation or cardiovascular death, with a hazard ratio (HR) non-inferiority margin of 1.20. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00379769., Findings: 321 people in the rosiglitazone group and 323 in the active control group experienced the primary outcome during a mean 5.5-year follow-up, meeting the criterion of non-inferiority (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.85-1.16). HR was 0.84 (0.59-1.18) for cardiovascular death, 1.14 (0.80-1.63) for myocardial infarction, and 0.72 (0.49-1.06) for stroke. Heart failure causing admission to hospital or death occurred in 61 people in the rosiglitazone group and 29 in the active control group (HR 2.10, 1.35-3.27, risk difference per 1000 person-years 2.6, 1.1-4.1). Upper and distal lower limb fracture rates were increased mainly in women randomly assigned to rosiglitazone. Mean HbA(1c) was lower in the rosiglitazone group than in the control group at 5 years., Interpretation: Addition of rosiglitazone to glucose-lowering therapy in people with type 2 diabetes is confirmed to increase the risk of heart failure and of some fractures, mainly in women. Although the data are inconclusive about any possible effect on myocardial infarction, rosiglitazone does not increase the risk of overall cardiovascular morbidity or mortality compared with standard glucose-lowering drugs., Funding: GlaxoSmithKline plc, UK.

Objectives: To determine the costs of severe hypoglycaemia (SH) in a population of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus in the Spanish healthcare system and the cost-effectiveness of insulin lispro over regular insulin in preventing SH episodes., Methods: A retrospective study of 100 patients in three Spanish health centres was performed. Resource utilisation data were collected only for interventions specifically relating to the hypoglycaemic episode. The direct medical costs determined in the analyses were: costs of hospitalisation, diagnostic tests carried out, costs of treatment administered and other associated costs such as visits to the endocrinologist and re-training in glucose control, transportation and assistance of a care-giver. In addition, indirect costs such as days of lost productivity were measured. The incidence rates of SH for insulin lispro and regular insulin were obtained from the literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness of insulin lispro over regular insulin was calculated., Results: The overall mean cost per episode of SH was 366 euro, comprised of 65.4% direct costs and 35.6% indirect costs. The largest cost was for hospitalisation at 183 euro per episode. The SH episodes incidence rates for 100 patients per year were 33 and 73 for insulin lispro and 48 (p < 0.05) and 117 (p < 0.01) for regular insulin, in the two clinical trials found in the literature. The additional cost to prevent one episode of SH with insulin lispro over regular insulin ranged from 277 euro to insulin lispro dominance., Conclusions: Severe hypoglycaemia has a significant impact on the total cost of diabetes. The use of insulin lispro is associated with reductions in annual costs because of SH and, possibly, the overall effect may be cost neutral or cost saving when total costs are considered. The cost of SH should be included in the analysis of total socio-economic burden of diabetes.

Aim: To examine the impact of inhaled human insulin (Exubera, EXU) on patient or physician willingness to adopt insulin after oral glucose-lowering agent failure., Methods: During a randomized controlled trial in primary, secondary and tertiary care in Europe and North America, 739 patients using >or= 2 oral glucose-lowering agents with glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) >or= 8.0% were assigned to two treatment groups: Group 1 (standard care with the option of EXU) or Group 2 (standard care only). Standard care included adjusting oral therapy (optimizing current regimen or adding/omitting agents) and/or initiating subcutaneous (s.c.) insulin. The primary endpoint was difference in HbA(1c) between randomized groups at 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes included differences in the rate of uptake of insulin therapy, proportion achieving satisfactory glycaemic control, treatment satisfaction and safety outcomes., Results: At baseline, insulin was initiated by more [odds ratio 6.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.2 to 8.8; P < 0.0001] patients in Group 1 (86.2%; 76.7% EXU plus 9.5% s.c.) than Group 2 (50.7%; s.c. insulin only). At 26 weeks, mean (sd) changes in HbA(1c) from baseline were -2.0% (1.2%) and -1.7% (1.3%) in Groups 1 and 2, respectively, a difference of -0.2% (95% CI: -0.1% to -0.4%; P = 0.004). In Group 1, 45% of patients achieved an HbA(1c)

Objective: For many patients with type 2 diabetes, oral antidiabetic agents (OADs) do not provide optimal glycaemic control, necessitating insulin therapy. Fear of hypoglycaemia is a major barrier to initiating insulin therapy. The AT.LANTUS study investigated optimal methods to initiate and maintain insulin glargine (LANTUS, glargine, Sanofi-aventis, Paris, France) therapy using two treatment algorithms. This subgroup analysis investigated the initiation of once-daily glargine therapy in patients suboptimally controlled on multiple OADs., Research Design and Methods: This study was a 24-week, multinational (59 countries), multicenter (611), randomized study. Algorithm 1 was a clinic-driven titration and algorithm 2 was a patient-driven titration. Titration was based on target fasting blood glucose < or =100 mg/dl (< or =5.5 mmol/l). Algorithms were compared for incidence of severe hypoglycaemia [requiring assistance and blood glucose <50 mg/dl (<2.8 mmol/l)] and baseline to end-point change in haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c))., Results: Of the 4961 patients enrolled in the study, 865 were included in this subgroup analysis: 340 received glargine plus 1 OAD and 525 received glargine plus >1 OAD. Incidence of severe hypoglycaemia was <1%. HbA(1c) decreased significantly between baseline and end-point for patients receiving glargine plus 1 OAD (-1.4%, p < 0.001; algorithm 1 -1.3% vs. algorithm 2 -1.5%; p = 0.03) and glargine plus >1 OAD (-1.7%, p < 0.001; algorithm 1 -1.5% vs. algorithm 2 -1.8%; p = 0.001)., Conclusions: This study shows that initiation of once-daily glargine with OADs results in significant reduction of HbA(1c) with a low risk of hypoglycaemia. The greater reduction in HbA(1c) was seen in patients randomized to the patient-driven algorithm (algorithm 2) on 1 or >1 OAD.

Background: Hypertension and type 2 diabetes are common co-morbidities. Preliminary studies suggest that thiazolidinediones reduce blood pressure (BP). We therefore used ambulatory BP to quantify BP lowering at 6-12 months with rosiglitazone used in combination with metformin or sulfonylureas compared to metformin and sulfonylureas in people with type 2 diabetes., Methods: Participants (n = 759) in the multicentre RECORD study were studied. Those taking metformin were randomized (open label) to add-on rosiglitazone or sulfonylureas, and those on sulfonylurea to add-on rosiglitazone or metformin., Results: 24-Hour ambulatory BP was measured at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. At 6 and 12 months, reductions in 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP (sBP) were greater with rosiglitazone versus metformin (difference at 6 months 2.7 [95% CI 0.5-4.9] mmHg, p = 0.015; 12 months 2.5 [95% CI 0.2-4.8] mmHg, p = 0.031). Corresponding changes for ambulatory diastolic BP (dBP) were comparable (6 months 2.7 [95% CI 1.4-4.0] mmHg, p < 0.001; 12 months 3.1 [95% CI 1.8-4.5] mmHg, p < 0.001). Similar differences were observed for rosiglitazone versus sulfonylureas at 12 months (sBP 2.7 [95% CI 0.5-4.9] mmHg, p = 0.016; dBP 2.1 [95% CI 0.7-3.4] mmHg, p = 0.003), but differences were smaller and/or not statistically significant at 6 months (sBP 1.5 [95% CI -0.6 to 3.6] mmHg, p = NS; dBP 1.3 [95% CI 0.0-2.5] mmHg, p = 0.049). Changes in BP were not accompanied by compensatory increases in heart rate, did not correlate with basal insulin sensitivity estimates and were not explained by changes in antihypertensive therapy between the various strata., Conclusion: When added to metformin or a sulfonylurea, 12-month treatment with rosiglitazone reduces ambulatory BP to a greater extent than when metformin and a sulfonylurea are combined., Trial Registration: NCT00379769 http://clinicaltrials.gov/

Aim: The AT.LANTUS study compared insulin glargine initiation and titration using one of two algorithms in suboptimally controlled subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) based on a primary outcome of severe hypoglycaemia. Secondary outcomes included other categories of hypoglycaemia, glycaemic control, weight changes and insulin dose. Here, we report the results of a subanalysis of the trial, which investigated whether insulin glargine can be initiated and titrated as effectively in primary [general practitioner (GP)] as secondary (hospital) care in patients with T2DM in the UK., Methods: The main study was a multicentre (n = 611), multinational (n = 59), open-label, 24-week randomized trial in 4,588 suboptimally controlled subjects with T2DM. Insulin glargine was titrated to target fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels of

Background: A recent meta-analysis raised concern regarding an increased risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes associated with rosiglitazone treatment of type 2 diabetes., Methods: We conducted an unplanned interim analysis of a randomized, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial involving 4447 patients with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycemic control while receiving metformin or sulfonylurea, in which 2220 patients were assigned to receive add-on rosiglitazone (rosiglitazone group), and 2227 to receive a combination of metformin plus sulfonylurea (control group). The primary end point was hospitalization or death from cardiovascular causes., Results: Because the mean follow-up was only 3.75 years, our interim analysis had limited statistical power to detect treatment differences. A total of 217 patients in the rosiglitazone group and 202 patients in the control group had the adjudicated primary end point (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.31). After the inclusion of end points pending adjudication, the hazard ratio was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.32). There were no statistically significant differences between the rosiglitazone group and the control group regarding myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes or any cause. There were more patients with heart failure in the rosiglitazone group than in the control group (hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.30 to 3.57)., Conclusions: Our interim findings from this ongoing study were inconclusive regarding the effect of rosiglitazone on the overall risk of hospitalization or death from cardiovascular causes. There was no evidence of any increase in death from either cardiovascular causes or all causes. Rosiglitazone was associated with an increased risk of heart failure. The data were insufficient to determine whether the drug was associated with an increase in the risk of myocardial infarction. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00379769 [ClinicalTrials.gov].)., (Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

This study assessed the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia with two insulin glargine titration algorithms: Algorithm 1 (increments of at least 10%, but not exceeding 4U) versus Algorithm 2 (1-6U increments). In this multicenter (n=409), multinational (n=54), open-label, 24-week randomized trial in 2442 subjects with sub-optimally controlled Type 1 diabetes (T1DM), mean prior insulin therapy duration was 14.6+/-10.3 years. The incidence of severe hypoglycaemia was similar with Algorithms 1 and 2 (16.6events/100 patient-years versus 14.4events/100 patient-years). There were similar rates of both symptomatic and nocturnal hypoglycaemia. HbA(1c) and fasting blood glucose (FBG) decreased significantly (baseline to endpoint; p<0.001), and comparably with Algorithms 1 and 2 (HbA(1c): -0.64% versus -0.72%; FBG: -57mg/dL versus -59mg/dL). Mean basal insulin dose increased with both algorithms (+5.7U versus +5.9U). In a diverse population with longstanding T1DM, transfer from any insulin regimen, including basal-bolus or premixed insulin to an insulin glargine-based regimen resulted in significant improvements in glycaemic control, with low rates of severe hypoglycaemia, irrespective of the titration algorithm used.

Aims: To compare glucose control over 18 months between rosiglitazone oral combination therapy and combination metformin and sulphonylurea in people with Type 2 diabetes., Methods: RECORD, a multicentre, parallel-group study of cardiovascular outcomes, enrolled people with an HbA(1c) of 7.1-9.0% on maximum doses of metformin or sulphonylurea. If on metformin they were randomized to add-on rosiglitazone or sulphonylurea (open label) and if on sulphonylurea to rosiglitazone or metformin. HbA(1c) was managed to < or = 7.0% by dose titration. A prospectively defined analysis of glycaemic control on the first 1122 participants is reported here, with a primary outcome assessed against a non-inferiority margin for HbA(1c) of 0.4%., Results: At 18 months, HbA(1c) reduction on background metformin was similar with rosiglitazone and sulphonylurea [difference 0.07 (95% CI -0.09, 0.23)%], as was the change when rosiglitazone or metformin was added to sulphonylurea [0.06 (-0.09, 0.20)%]. At 6 months, the effect on HbA(1c) was greater with add-on sulphonylurea, but was similar whether sulphonylurea was added to rosiglitazone or metformin. Differences in fasting plasma glucose were not statistically significant at 18 months [rosiglitazone vs. sulphonylurea -0.36 (-0.74, 0.02) mmol/l, rosiglitazone vs. metformin -0.34 (-0.73, 0.05) mmol/l]. Increased homeostasis model assessment insulin sensitivity and reduced C-reactive protein were greater with rosiglitazone than metformin or sulphonylurea (all P < or = 0.001). Body weight was significantly increased with rosiglitazone compared with sulphonylurea [difference 1.2 (0.4, 2.0) kg, P = 0.003] and metformin [difference 4.3 (3.6, 5.1) kg, P < 0.001]., Conclusions: In people with diabetes, rosiglitazone in combination with metformin or sulphonylurea was demonstrated to be non-inferior to the standard combination of metformin + sulphonylurea in lowering HbA(1c) over 18 months, and produces greater improvements in C-reactive protein and basal insulin sensitivity but is also associated with greater weight gain.

Aims/hypothesis: Studies suggest that in addition to blood glucose concentrations, thiazolidinediones such as rosiglitazone improve some cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and surrogate markers, that are abnormal in type 2 diabetes. However, fluid retention might lead to cardiac failure in a minority of people. The aim of the Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes (RECORD) study is to evaluate the long-term impact of these effects on CV outcomes, as well as on long-term glycaemic control, in people with type 2 diabetes., Materials and Methods: RECORD is a 6-year, randomised, open-label study in type 2 diabetic patients with inadequate blood glucose control (HbA1c 7.1-9.0%) on metformin or sulphonylurea alone. The study is being performed in 327 centres in Europe and Australasia. After a 4-week run-in, participants were randomised by current treatment stratum to add-on rosiglitazone, metformin or sulphonylurea, with dose titration to a target HbA1c of < or = 7.0%. If confirmed HbA1c rises to > or = 8.5%, either a third glucose-lowering drug is added (rosiglitazone-treated group) or insulin is started (non-rosiglitazone group). The same criterion for failure of triple oral drug therapy in the rosiglitazone-treated group is used for starting insulin in this group. The primary endpoint is the time to first CV hospitalisation or death, blindly adjudicated by a central endpoints committee. The study aim is to evaluate non-inferiority of the rosiglitazone group vs the non-rosiglitazone group with respect to CV outcomes. Safety, tolerability and study conduct are monitored by an independent board. All CV endpoint and safety data are held and analysed by a clinical trials organisation, and are not available to the study investigators while data collection is open., Results: Over a 2-year period a total of 7,428 people were screened in 25 countries. Of these, 4,458 were randomised; 2,228 on background metformin, 2,230 on background sulphonylurea. Approximately half of the participants are male (52%) and almost all are Caucasian (99%)., Conclusions/interpretation: The RECORD study should provide robust data on the extent to which rosiglitazone, in combination with metformin or sulphonylurea therapy, affects CV outcomes and progression of diabetes in the long term.

A major aim of glucose-lowering therapy in people with diabetes is to delay or prevent the late-developing complications of diabetes that threaten the quality and duration of life. While intensive interventions to control hyperglycaemia may impair well-being to some extent, the balance of quality of life is usually highly positive. Diet and exercise therapy remains the cornerstone of management, and should usually be given a trial alone first. However, the magnitude and duration of benefit from this intervention is insufficient for most people. More frequent, early, use of metformin is an evidence-based strategy for reducing the risk of adverse outcomes of diabetes in people with type 2 diabetes with sub-optimal glucose control on lifestyle measures alone. This has been recognised in recent evidenced-based guidelines from the UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence and from Diabetes UK, which now support the use of metformin as initial pharmacological therapy for all people without contraindications to the drug. Other national and local guideline committees should consider updating their recommendations on diabetes management in line with these findings.

The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) demonstrated that intensive management in people with type 1 diabetes delays the onset and the progression of microvascular complications associated with the disease. However, it is also known that intensive regimens can increase the number of hypoglycaemias and that the perception of symptoms decreases in relation to the statutes of metabolic control 1. Impairment of hypoglycaemic awareness is reported by up to 50% of patients with type 1 diabetes and it is associated with an increase of severe episodes of hypoglycaemia 2. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) has become a major tool in the management of diabetes. Current recommendations suggest frequent SMBG. The major inconvenience of SMBG is due to the limitations of the glycaemic profile obtained from intermittent finger-sticks. This is an incomplete picture of blood glucose excursions; moreover, the frequent SMBG is not readily accepted by patients suffering from diabetes because it is invasive and painful., (Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Context: The worldwide explosive increase in type 2 diabetes mellitus and its cardiovascular morbidity are becoming major health concerns., Objective: To evaluate the effect of decreasing postprandial hyperglycemia with acarbose, an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, on the risk of cardiovascular disease and hypertension in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT)., Design, Setting, and Participants: International, multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, undertaken in hospitals in Canada, Germany, Austria, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Israel, and Spain from July 1998 through August 2001. A total of 1429 patients with IGT were randomized with 61 patients (4%) excluded because they did not have IGT or had no postrandomization data, leaving 1368 patients for a modified intent-to-treat analysis. Both men (49%) and women (51%) participated with a mean (SD) age of 54.5 (7.9) years and body mass index of 30.9 (4.2). These patients were followed up for a mean (SD) of 3.3 (1.2) years., Intervention: Patients with IGT were randomized to receive either placebo (n = 715) or 100 mg of acarbose 3 times a day (n = 714)., Main Outcome Measures: The development of major cardiovascular events (coronary heart disease, cardiovascular death, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular event, and peripheral vascular disease) and hypertension (> or =140/90 mm Hg)., Results: Three hundred forty-one patients (24%) discontinued their participation prematurely, 211 in the acarbose-treated group and 130 in the placebo group; these patients were also followed up for outcome parameters. Decreasing postprandial hyperglycemia with acarbose was associated with a 49% relative risk reduction in the development of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR], 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.28-0.95; P =.03) and a 2.5% absolute risk reduction. Among cardiovascular events, the major reduction was in the risk of myocardial infarction (HR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.72; P =.02). Acarbose was also associated with a 34% relative risk reduction in the incidence of new cases of hypertension (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.89; P =.006) and a 5.3% absolute risk reduction. Even after adjusting for major risk factors, the reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24-0.90; P =.02) and hypertension (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.86; P =.004) associated with acarbose treatment was still statistically significant., Conclusion: This study suggests that treating IGT patients with acarbose is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of cardiovascular disease and hypertension.

This prospective, 16-week, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study assessed the differential impact of the prandial glucose regulating oral hypoglycaemic drug, repaglinide, and placebo upon perceptions of quality of life (QoL) and treatment satisfaction in pharmacotherapy-naive patients with Type 2 diabetes. In addition, the study assessed whether these outcomes were influenced by the patients' level of glycaemic control. A total of 253 patients were randomised in a 2:1 ratio of repaglinide: placebo, with doses taken flexibly with main meals (2-4 per day), whenever they were eaten. Repaglinide was initiated at 0.5 mg per meal, increased to 1 mg after 4 weeks if fasting plasma glucose exceeded 7.8 mmol/l. QoL and treatment satisfaction outcomes were compared using generic and disease-specific self-assessment measures, previously applied in diabetes: the WHO Wellbeing Questionnaire (WHO-WBQ), WHO Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (WHO-DTSQ) and EuroQoL EQ-5D. Over the trial period, repaglinide-treated patients reported a significant 9% improvement in (WHO-DTSQ) treatment satisfaction score (p < 0.05). No significant increase was associated with placebo. The correlation between decrease in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and increase in treatment satisfaction (WHO-DTSQ) was -0.22 (p < 0.01). Scores obtained with the other measures did not change significantly during the trial in either group, but the cohort exhibited only a slight reduction in wellbeing (WHO-WBQ) and health status (EQ-5D) at baseline compared with the background population. In conclusion, flexible mealtime dosing with oral medication appears to be well accepted by pharmacotherapy-naïve patients with Type 2 diabetes. The results suggest that repaglinide provides a higher level of treatment satisfaction than placebo, and this may in part relate to improved glycaemic control.

Background: The worldwide increase in type 2 diabetes mellitus is becoming a major health concern. We aimed to assess the effect of acarbose in preventing or delaying conversion of impaired glucose tolerance to type 2 diabetes., Methods: In a multicentre, placebo-controlled randomised trial, we randomly allocated patients with impaired glucose tolerance to 100 mg acarbose or placebo three times daily. The primary endpoint was development of diabetes on the basis of a yearly oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Analyses were by intention to treat., Findings: We randomly allocated 714 patients with impaired glucose tolerance to acarbose and 715 to placebo. We excluded 61 (4%) patients because they did not have impaired glucose tolerance or had no postrandomisation data. 211 (31%) of 682 patients in the acarbose group and 130 (19%) of 686 on placebo discontinued treatment early. 221 (32%) patients randomised to acarbose and 285 (42%) randomised to placebo developed diabetes (relative hazard 0.75 [95% CI 0.63-0.90]; p=0.0015). Furthermore, acarbose significantly increased reversion of impaired glucose tolerance to normal glucose tolerance (p<0.0001). At the end of the study, treatment with placebo for 3 months was associated with an increase in conversion of impaired glucose tolerance to diabetes. The most frequent side-effects to acarbose treatment were flatulence and diarrhoea., Interpretation: Acarbose could be used, either as an alternative or in addition to changes in lifestyle, to delay development of type 2 diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance.

Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is determined by measuring plasma glucose levels 2 hours after glucose loading in the oral glucose tolerance test. There is good evidence from epidemiologic and prospective trials [e.g. Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative Analysis of Diagnostic Criteria in Europe (DECODE)] linking IGT with the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease (CVD). IGT is characterized by an increase in postprandial glucose levels, which is considered the earliest metabolic abnormality in type 2 diabetes mellitus. It is one of a series of risk factors for CVD (hypertension, high triglyceride levels, low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and central obesity), known as the metabolic syndrome. The different factors making up this syndrome are intimately related. An impaired lipid profile can contribute to insulin resistance, as IGT may play a pathogenic role on other cardiovascular risk factors. IGT is the first easily identifiable step in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus. It is associated with high risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus and subsequent vascular morbidity and mortality. It is currently unknown whether treating IGT will reduce the incidence of macrovascular complications, as studies addressing this issue have yet to be conducted. Therefore, the main reason to identify and treat IGT is to prevent or delay the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus. It has been demonstrated that lifestyle intervention with diet and exercise can reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pharmacologic intervention with metformin and acarbose is also effective. Other drugs, such as those indicated to treat other parameters of the metabolic syndrome, may also be useful. We can now be assured that prevention or delay of onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus is possible in individuals with IGT, either by changes in lifestyle or by pharmacotherapy.

Tungstate was orally administered to 7.5-week-old male Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats that already showed moderate hyperglycemia (180 +/- 16 mg/dl). The animals became normoglycemic for approximately 10 days. Then, glycemia started to rise again, although it did not reach the initial values until day 24, when levels stabilized at approximately 200 mg/dl for the duration of the experiment. Untreated ZDF rats showed steadily increased blood glucose levels between 7.5 and 10 weeks of age, when they reached a maximum value of 450 +/- 19 mg/dl, which was maintained throughout the experiment. In addition, tolerance to intraperitoneal glucose load improved in treated diabetic rats. Serum levels of triglycerides were elevated in untreated diabetic rats compared with their lean counterparts (ZLC). In the liver of diabetic animals, glucokinase (GK), glycogen phosphorylase a (GPa), liver-pyruvate kinase (L-PK), and fatty acid synthase (FAS) activities decreased by 81, 30, 54, and 35%, respectively, whereas phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) levels increased by 240%. Intracellular glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) decreased by 40%, whereas glycogen levels remained unaffected. Tungstate treatment of these rats induced a 42% decrease in serum levels of triglycerides and normalized hepatic G6P concentrations, GPa activity, and PEPCK levels. GK activity in treated diabetic rats increased to 50% of the values of untreated ZLC rats. L-PK and FAS activity increased to higher values than those in untreated lean rats (1.7-fold L-PK and 2.4-fold FAS). Hepatic glycogen levels were 55% higher than those in untreated diabetic and healthy rats. Tungstate treatment did not significantly change the phosphotyrosine protein profile of primary cultured hepatocytes from diabetic animals. These data suggest that tungstate administration to ZDF rats causes a considerable reduction of glycemia, mainly through a partial restoration of hepatic glucose metabolism and a decrease in lipotoxicity.

Objective: This double-blind randomized placebo-controlled parallel group study assessed the efficacy and safety (with particular regard to body weight and hypoglycemia) of repaglinide when used in a flexible mealtime dosing regimen in a situation close to everyday clinical practice., Research Design and Methods: A total of 408 patients with type 2 diabetes considered poorly controlled by diet, but without a history of previous antidiabetic medication, were randomized to receive 0.5 mg repaglinide at mealtimes (increased to 1 mg after 4 weeks depending on blood glucose response) or placebo for 16 weeks. Patients were free to choose a flexible meal pattern, adjusting the dosing schedule from two to four preprandial doses per day in accordance with a "one meal, one dose; no meal, no dose" principle. Additional snacks were not a requirement of the treatment schedule., Results: Treatment with repaglinide significantly improved glycemic control with respect to baseline and placebo, reducing HbA1c by 1.14% from baseline and fasting plasma glucose by 1.8 mmol/l. Improvement in glycemic control was independent of the meal pattern adopted by patients, including those most commonly taking two or four meals daily, with no correlation between meal pattern and risk of hypoglycemia. The improvement in glycemic control was also independent of degree of obesity and age < or =65 or >65 years. There was no significant body weight increase in the repaglinide group., Conclusions: Mealtime dosing with repaglinide is effective in improving overall glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients for which control is suboptimal using diet alone. Patients are able to vary their meal pattern from a conventional regimen of three meals daily without compromising control or increasing the risk of adverse events.

Sulfonylureas are used to treat patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus when diet and exercise fail. Glimepiride, a new sulfonylurea, can be administered in one daily dose, thanks to its pharmacokinetic properties. We attempted to establish the optimal time of day for the administration of Glimepiride in a group of patients from the Mediterranean area by clinical trial. No relationship was found between the time of administration and fasting blood glucose values, or HbA1c, or the frequency or severity of hypoglycemic episodes.

Aims: This study was designed to test the efficacy and safety of low-dose rosiglitazone, a potent, insulin-sensitizing thiazolidinedione, in combination with sulphonylurea in Type 2 diabetic patients., Methods: For the intention-to-treat analysis, 574 patients (59% male, mean age 61 years) were available, randomized to receive 26 weeks of twice-daily placebo (n = 192), rosiglitazone 1 mg (n = 199) or rosiglitazone 2 mg (n = 183) in addition to existing sulphonylurea treatment with gliclazide (47.6% of patients), glibenclamide (41.8%) or glipizide (9.4%) (two patients were taking carbutamide or glimepiride). Change in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fructosamine, insulin, C-peptide, albumin, and lipids were measured, and safety was evaluated., Results: Mean baseline HbA1c was 9.2% and FPG was 11.4 mmol/l. Rosiglitazone at doses of 1 and 2 mg b.d. plus sulphonylurea produced significant decreases, compared with sulphonylurea plus placebo, in HbA1c (-0.59% and -1.03%, respectively; both P<0.0001) and FPG (1.35 mmol/l and 2.44 mmol/l, respectively; both P<0.0001). Both HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol increased and potentially beneficial decreases in non-esterified fatty acids and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase levels were seen in both rosiglitazone groups. The overall incidence of adverse experiences was similar in all three treatment groups, with no significant cardiac events, hypoglycaemia or hepatotoxicity., Conclusions: Overall, the combination of rosiglitazone and a sulphonylurea was safe, well tolerated and effective in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

We have recently shown in vitro that 4-hydroxyisoleucine (4-OH-Ile), an amino acid extracted from fenugreek seeds, potentiates insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner. The present study was designed to investigate whether 4-OH-Ile could exert in vivo insulinotropic and antidiabetic properties. For this purpose, intravenous or oral glucose tolerance tests (IVGTTs and OGTTs, respectively) were performed not only in normal animals but also in a type II diabetes rat model. During IVGTT in normal rats or OGTT in normal dogs, 4-OH-Ile (18 mg/kg) improved glucose tolerance. The lactonic form of 4-OH-Ile was ineffective in normal rats. In non-insulin-dependent diabetic (NIDD) rats, a single intravenous administration of 4-OH-Ile (50 mg/kg) partially restored glucose-induced insulin response without affecting glucose tolerance; a 6-day subchronic administration of 4-OH-Ile (50 mg/kg, daily) reduced basal hyperglycemia, decreased basal insulinemia, and slightly, but significantly, improved glucose tolerance. In vitro, 4-OH-Ile (200 microM) potentiated glucose (16.7 mM)-induced insulin release from NIDD rat-isolated islets. So, the antidiabetic effects of 4-OH-Ile on NIDD rats result, at least in part, from a direct pancreatic B cell stimulation.

Aims: To elucidate the effect of prophylactic insulin, in a treatment schedule previously demonstrated to achieve beta-cell rest, in a group of high-risk, non-diabetic first-degree relatives of Type 1 diabetic patients., Methods: Ten high risk subjects for Type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) (seven male/three female, aged 19.8+/-9.6 years) defined as: first-degree relatives of Type 1 DM patients, islet cell autoantibodies (ICA) > or =20 Juvenile Diabetes Foundation (JDF) units twice, first phase insulin response (FPIR) to glucose in an intravenous glucose tolerance test < or =10th percentile of a control group were included in an open pilot trial. Five were treated with subcutaneous insulin: 0.1 IU/kg body weight/day of neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) insulin once a day. Five declined treatment and were used as controls. Control and treatment groups did not differ in terms of age, ICA, insulin autoantibodies (IAA), glutamic acid dehydrogenase (GAD) and FPIR., Results: Three out of five subjects in both groups developed Type 1 DM during follow-up: after 21, and 32-57 months in the insulin-treated group and after 4, and 18-60 months in the untreated group. Three out of six subjects who developed overt diabetes had a FPIR below the 2nd percentile of the control value at the onset of the study. All subjects who developed diabetes were positive for antibodies to GAD and expressed the HLA-DR3 or DR4 alleles, whereas only one of the non-progressors had these parameters (P < 0.05). During follow-up, a decrease in ICA titres was observed in the group which received prophylactic insulin in contrast with the untreated group. GAD, as well as insulin secretory capacity, remained unchanged in both groups., Conclusion: The subcutaneous administration of insulin (0.1 IU/kg body weight/day of NPH insulin once a day) in our group of high-risk subjects for Type 1 DM produced only a minor effect in some immunological markers (ICA), without preventing the development of overt disease. The efficacy and safety of insulin used at either a different dose or by a different route, as well as its potential effect in the early phases of prediabetes, warrants further investigation.

The action of repaglinide, a carbamoylmethyl benzoic acid derivative, mimics the physiological insulin secretion that is deficient in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Repaglinide stimulates insulin release from beta-cells only in the presence of glucose. Two placebo-controlled studies were performed to establish the effective dose range of repaglinide. In one study, repaglinide (0.25-4.0 mg preprandially) caused a dose-dependent decrease in blood glucose and a non-dose-dependent increase in insulin over 4 weeks (all doses p < 0.001 vs. placebo). In the second study, repaglinide (0.25-8.0 mg preprandially) was titrated over 6 weeks to obtain the optimum response (fasting plasma glucose < 8.9 mmol/L). The titration period was followed by a 12-week dose-maintenance period. At the end of the study, repaglinide had decreased fasting plasma glucose by 3.4 mmol/L (p < 0.05) and 2-h postprandial blood glucose by 5.8 mmol/L (p < 0.001) versus placebo. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) decreased significantly from 8.5% to 7.9% in the repaglinide group and increased significantly from 8.1% to 9.2% in the placebo group (p < 0.001 between groups). In five 1-year, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, phase III trials, repaglinide (0.5-4.0 mg preprandially) was compared with the sulphonylureas glibenclamide, glipizide and gliclazide. Repaglinide was more effective than glipizide at maintaining glycaemic control and was equivalent to glibenclamide and gliclazide on the basis of change in HbA1c. Hypoglycaemic events were reported in 16% of repaglinide-treated patients and 15-20% of sulphonylurea-treated patients. These data indicate that repaglinide monotherapy, with diet and exercise, is effective in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Objective: To describe the rationale and design, and to discuss the preliminary screening data, of the Study to Prevent NIDDM (STOP-NIDDM Trial), an international study on the efficacy of the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor acarbose in preventing or delaying the development of type 2 diabetes in a population with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT)., Research Design and Methods: A total of 1,418 subjects diagnosed with IGT according to the World Health Organization's criteria and having a fasting plasma glucose concentration > or =5.6 mmol/L were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either acarbose (100 mg t.i.d.) or placebo for a predictive median follow-up period of 3.9 years. The primary outcome is the development of type 2 diabetes diagnosed using a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test according to the new criteria. The secondary outcomes are changes in blood pressure, lipid profile, insulin sensitivity, cardiovascular events, and morphometric profile., Results: Screening was performed in a high-risk population. As of 1 March 1997, 4,424 subjects had been screened, and data were available for 3,919 (88.5%) subjects. Of these subjects, 1,200 (30.6%) had glucose intolerance. Of the subjects with glucose intolerance, 521 (13.3%) had previously undetected type 2 diabetes, and 679 (17.3%) had IGT. Of the IGT population, 412 (60.7%) subjects were eligible for the study This population had the following characteristics: the mean age was 54.8 years, 52% of the subjects were female, 53% had more than one risk factor for type 2 diabetes, >90% had a family history of diabetes, 78.2% had a BMI > or =27 kg/m2, 47.5% had high blood pressure, 51.2% had dyslipidemia, and 22.8% of the women had a history of gestational diabetes., Conclusions: Screening of a high-risk population yields one eligible subject per every 10 volunteers screened. This study should definitely answer the question of whether acarbose can prevent or delay the progression of IGT to type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Objective: To evaluate the possible effect of short- and long-term insulin treatment on arterial blood pressure (BP) and endothelin-1 (ET-1) plasma levels in type 2 diabetic patients., Research Design and Methods: Seven type 2 diabetic patients with secondary failure to oral hypoglycemic drugs (SFOH) were studied. Twenty-four-hour arterial BP monitorization (Spacelabs 90207) was performed before initiation of insulin treatment (time 0), 6 days after (time 1) and 1 year later (time 2). Moreover, ET-1 plasma levels were measured., Results: Insulin treatment did not produce any variation in systolic (124.3 +/- 11.6; 120.7 +/- 7.9; 127.0 +/- 13.4 mmHg) and diastolic (72.8 +/- 5.9; 71.5 +/- 3.4; 71.8 +/- 5.2 mmHg) 24-h BP monitorization at times 0, 1 and 2, respectively. The systolic and diastolic day/night differences did not change in the three times studied. Neither were significant differences observed in ET-1 plasma levels., Conclusions: In patients with SFOH, insulin treatment did not induce any short- or long-term increase in BP or any variation in plasma ET-1 levels.

We report the characterization of a new insulinotropic compound, 4-hydroxyisoleucine. This amino acid has been extracted and purified from fenugreek seeds, which are known in traditional medicine for their antidiabetic properties. 4-Hydroxyisoleucine increases glucose-induced insulin release, in the concentration range of 100 micromol/l to 1 mmol/l, through a direct effect on isolated islets of Langerhans from both rats and humans. The stimulating effect of 4-hydroxyisoleucine was strictly glucose dependent; indeed, ineffective at low (3 mmol/l) or basal (5 mmol/l) glucose concentrations, the amino acid potentiated the insulin secretion induced by supranormal (6.6-16.7 mmol/l) concentrations of glucose. In addition, in the isolated perfused rat pancreas, we could show 1) that the pattern of insulin secretion induced by 4-hydroxyisoleucine was biphasic, 2) that this effect occurred in the absence of any change in pancreatic alpha- and delta-cell activity, and 3) that the more glucose concentration was increased, the more insulin response was amplified. Moreover, 4-hydroxyisoleucine did not interact with other agonists of insulin secretion (leucine, arginine, tolbutamide, glyceraldehyde). Therefore, we conclude that 4-hydroxyisoleucine insulinotropic activity might, at least in part, account for fenugreek seeds' antidiabetic properties. This secretagogue may be considered as a novel drug with potential interest for the treatment of NIDDM.

The aim of the study was to determine the appropriate dose of subcutaneous insulin to induce "beta-cell rest" without any hypoglycemic risk, as the first stop in the investigation of its potential effect in preventing or delaying clinical diabetes mellitus onset in high-risk subjects. Four subjects at high risk for type I diabetes mellitus (first-degree relatives, islet cell antibodies (ICA)-positive, and with diminished first-phase insulin secretion) were compared with four healthy individuals. After hospitalization, urinary C-peptide excretion (UCP) and 24-hour serum profiles for glucose were measured before and after administration of NPH insulin 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 U x kg body weight per day subcutaneously in a single dose on 4 consecutive days. After insulin 0.1 U x kg body weight, a significant inhibition of endogenous insulin secretion was observed in high-risk subjects, but not in control subjects. There was no further inhibition when a higher insulin dose (0.2 and 0.3) was administered. A sustained beta-cell rest was obtained after 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment with 0.1 U x kg body weight per day as outpatient therapy in high-risk subjects. With this dose, no subject developed hypoglycemia (plasma glucose <50 mg/dL), whereas this adverse effect was detected after 0.2 and 0.3 U x kg body weight in both groups. In conclusion, our results indicate that administration of NPH insulin 0.1 U x kg bodyweight per day induces beta-cell rest without the undesirable effect of hypoglycemic episodes. This is a preliminary study to investigate the potential beneficial effect of insulin in preventing or delaying type I diabetes mellitus in subjects at high risk for the disease.

Pancreatic islet homogenates display calcium-sensitive transglutaminase activity, but the role of this enzyme in the process of insulin release remains to be elucidated. Tolbutamide, gliclazide, glisoxepide, glipizide and glibenclamide inhibited transglutaminase activity in islet homogenates. When the cationic response of islet cells to hypoglycaemic sulphonylureas was suppressed by exposing intact islets to quinine, tolbutamide, gliclazide and glibenclamide caused a rapid, sustained, reversible and dose-related inhibition of insulin release. The relative efficiency of distinct hypoglycaemic sulphonylureas as inhibitor of transglutaminase activity was in mirror image of their relative potency as insulin secretagogue. However, the dose-action relationship for the inhibitory action of these agents upon insulin release from quinine-treated islets was similar in response to either tolbutamide, gliclazide or glibenclamide. These results indicate that hypoglycaemic sulphonylureas may exert an inhibitory action upon insulin release, but suggest that such an effect is not tightly related to inhibition of transglutaminase.

Aims/hypothesis. Recent studies have shown the anti diabetic effects of oral sodium tungstate treatment in several animal models of diabetes based on short-term experiments. In this study, we examined the effectiveness of long-term tungstate treatment of streptozotocin-induced-diabetic rats. Methods. Tungstate was administered to the drinking water of rats for eight months. Results. The treatment resulted in a reduction in serum glucose concentrations in diabetic rats, but no change in glycaemia was detected in healthy rats. Alterations in the hepatic glucose metabolism due to diabetes were almost completely counteracted by tungstate treatment. The partial recovery of glucokinase activity, not found in diabetic animals, normalised glycogen and glucose 6-phosphate concentrations. Tungstate treatment also restored pyruvate kinase activity and fructose 2,6-bisphosphate concentrations. In healthy rats, tungstate treatment did not modify the majority of the hepatic parameters studied. Moreover, tungstate treatment prevented diabetes-induced morphological changes in the kidney and ocular lens and also reduced mortality. Furthermore, no hypoglycaemic episodes or undesirable side effects were observed in treated diabetic or healthy rats. In addition, there is no evidence of intolerance developing after prolonged use. Conclusion/interpretation. Tungstate could play a helpful part in the long-term treatment of diabetes. [Diabetologia (2001) 44: 507–513] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims/hypothesis. Sodium tungstate has recently emerged as an effective oral treatment for diabetes. We examined the effects of tungstate administration in the beta-cell mass of the pancreas as well as its therapeutic potential. Methods. Sodium tungstate was administered via drinking water to healthy and neonatal streptozotocin (nSTZ)-diabetic rats for one month. The pancreas from each rat was removed and morphometric and immunocytochemical studies were carried out. The molecular mechanism of tungstate’s action was also studied. Results. In nSTZ rats administration of this compound normalised glycaemia, and increased insulinaemia and islet insulin content. Blood glucose concentrations were normalised as early as on day 4 of treatment, and tungstate treatment produced a partial recovery of beta-cell mass. The rats remained normoglycaemic after tungstate withdrawal. Morphometric studies showed that the increase in beta-cell mass was not due to beta-cell hypertrophy but to hyperplasia, with an increase in islet density in treated diabetic rats. Tungstate treatment increased extra-islet beta-cell replication without modifying intra-islet beta-cell replication rates. Moreover, the treatment induced increases in insulin-positive cells located close to ducts; and in PDX-1 positive cells scattered in the exocrine tissue, suggesting active neogenesis. In islets from treated diabetic rats, tungstate is able to increase the phosphorylation state of PDX-1 through the activation of p38. Conclusion/interpretation. These observations indicate that tungstate treatment is able to regenerate a stable, functional pancreatic beta-cell population which leads to and maintains normoglycaemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]