Search

Purpose: To evaluate the response rate, pain relief duration, and time it took for pain to decline or resolve after radiation therapy (RT) with or without fever-range Whole Body Hyperthermia (WBH) in bony metastatic patients with mainly primary tumor of prostate and breast cancer leading to bone pain., Materials & Methods: Bony metastatic patients with pain score ≥4 on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) underwent RT of 30 Gy in 10 fractions in combination with WBH with nursing care under medical supervision versus RT-alone. WBH application time was 3-4 h in three fractions with at least 48-h intervals. All patients were stratified primary site, breast or prostate cancer vs others, BPI score, and exclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) (BPI equal to zero with no increase of analgesics) within two months of follow-up., Results: Based on this study, the RT-alone group showed the worst pain. The study was terminated after the enrollment of a total of 61 patients, 5 years after the first enrollment (April 2016 to February 2021). Finally, the CR rate in RT + WBH revealed the most significant difference with RT-alone, 47.4% versus 5.3% respectively within 2 months post-treatment (P-value <0.05). The time of complete pain relief was 10 days for RT + WBH, while the endpoint was not reached during the RT-alone arm. Pain progression or stable disease was observed in half of the patients in RT-alone group within 4 weeks after treatment. However, this score was near zero in RT + WBHT patients in two months post-treatment., Conclusions: WBH plus RT showed significant increases in pain relief and shorter response time in comparison with RT-alone for patients with bone metastatic lesions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Purpose: To compare different thermal tissue models for head and neck hyperthermia treatment planning, and to assess the results using predicted and measured applied power data from clinical treatments., Methods: Three commonly used temperature models from literature were analysed: "constant baseline", "constant thermal stress" and "temperature dependent". Power and phase data of 93 treatments of 20 head and neck patients treated with the HYPERcollar3D applicator were used. The impact on predicted median temperature T50 inside the target region was analysed with maximum allowed temperature of 44 °C in healthy tissue. The robustness of predicted T50 for the three models against the influence of blood perfusion, thermal conductivity and the assumed hotspot temperature level was analysed., Results: We found an average predicted T50 of 41.0 ± 1.3 °C (constant baseline model), 39.9 ± 1.1 °C (constant thermal stress model) and 41.7 ± 1.1 °C (temperature dependent model). The constant thermal stress model resulted in the best agreement between the predicted power (P = 132.7 ± 45.9 W) and the average power measured during the hyperthermia treatments (P = 129.1 ± 83.0 W)., Conclusion: The temperature dependent model predicts an unrealistically high T50. The power values for the constant thermal stress model, after scaling simulated maximum temperatures to 44 °C, matched best to the average measured powers. We consider this model to be the most appropriate for temperature predictions using the HYPERcollar3D applicator, however further studies are necessary for developing of robust temperature model for tissues during heat stress., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest G. C. van Rhoon and M. M. Paulides have financial interest in Sensius BV. All other authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Protein homeostasis or proteostasis, the correct balance between production and degradation of proteins, is an essential pillar for proper cellular function. Among the several cellular mechanisms that disrupt homeostatic conditions in cancer cells, hyperthermia (HT) has shown promising anti-tumor effects. However, cancer cells are also capable of thermoresistance. Indeed, HT-induced protein denaturation and aggregation results in the up regulation of heat shock proteins, a group of molecular chaperones with cytoprotective and anti-apoptotic properties via stress-inducible transcription factor, heat shock factor 1(HSF1). Heat shock proteins assist in the refolding of misfolded proteins and aids in their elimination if they become irreversibly damaged by various stressors. Furthermore, HSF1 also initiates the unfolded protein response in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to assist in the protein folding capacity of ER and also promotes the translation of pro-survival proteins' mRNA such as activating transcription factor 4 (ATF 4). Moreover, HT associated induction of microRNAs is also involved in thermal resistance of cancer cells via up-regulation of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins and down regulation of pro-apoptotic Bax and caspase 3 activities. Another cellular protection in response to stressors is Autophagy, which is regulated by the Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) protein. Kinase activity in mTOR phosphorylates HSF1 and promotes its nuclear translocation for heat shock protein synthesis. Over-expression of heat shock proteins are reported to up-regulate Beclin-1, an autophagy initiator. Moreover, HT-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation is sensitized by transcription factor NF-E2 related factor 2 (Nrf2) and activates the cellular expression of antioxidants and autophagy gene. Furthermore, ROS also potentiates autophagy via activation of Beclin-1. Inhibition of thermotolerance can potentiate HT-induced apoptosis. Here, we outlined that heat stress alters cellular proteins which activates cellular homeostatic processes to promote cell survival and make cancer cells thermotolerant., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)