Search

One hypothesis in the literature on anger and hypertension is that a chronic tendency to suppress anger is an etiological factor in the development of hypertension. The present study assessed the relationship between anger expression and hypertension in a multicultural sample of 1,407 San Francisco bus drivers. Simple and multiple regression analyses revealed no significant differences between suppressed or expressed anger and hypertension. Thus, the results of this study do not support the hypothesis that suppressed anger is an etiological factor in hypertension.

The link between blood pressure measured at juvenile ages (3-18 years) and subsequent adult ages (30 and 50 years) was investigated in a community-based longitudinal study conducted in the San Francisco Bay Area from 1928 to the present. The original sample of 550 persons decreased 61 percent by age 50 years, leaving only 211 persons in the cohort. Blood pressure was measured annually up to age 18 years and each decade thereafter, providing a unique opportunity to link childhood and adult blood pressures over periods of up to 50 years. Juvenile blood pressure measured from age 6 years onward was a positive predictor of blood pressure at age 30 years. Blood pressure measured at age 50 years was predicted best by juvenile pressures measured at early school age and early puberty. The juvenile-adult blood pressure association was partly explained by controlling for smoking and parental history of cardiovascular disease, but was not explained by controlling for juvenile height or body mass. It was stronger in children from blue collar families. The reported correlations probably represent an underestimation of the true strength of the association because of a greater loss to follow-up among subjects with higher blood pressure and the effects of antihypertensive medication in adulthood.

Objectives: In this study we tested the association between occupational stress--as measured by job demands, decision latitude, and job strain--and hypertension in a population of 1396 Black and White bus drivers., Methods: Height, weight, blood pressure, and medical history were assessed by physical exam. Drivers completed a questionnaire assessing their work schedules, personal habits, and self-perceptions about job demands and decision latitude., Results: Univariate analyses revealed significant inverse associations; lower levels of job demands and job strain were associated with a higher prevalence of hypertension for Blacks and Whites. After 12 confounding variables were controlled for, the association between these two measures of occupational stress and hypertension became nonsignificant. Decision latitude was also not significantly associated with hypertension., Conclusions: Our findings are inconsistent with previous studies' findings of a positive association between job strain and chronic diseases. The difference in results may be explained by our incorporation of individuals' perceptions in the measurement of occupational stressors and our use of individuals from a single occupation with comparable job responsibilities and income, thus controlling for potential confounding by social class.

Previous studies of Mexican Americans have shown mean diastolic and systolic blood pressures and prevalence rates of hypertension which are either lower than or similar to those for non-Hispanic whites despite the predominance of obesity in Mexican Americans. However, those results are based on restricted samples from California and Texas. Using data from the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1976-1980) and the Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1982-1984), the authors examined ethnic differences in blood pressure and hypertension. Regression analyses, stratified by sex, were used to compare mean blood pressures and rates of hypertension in Mexican Americans with those for whites and blacks. Mean diastolic and systolic blood pressures, as well as the prevalence of hypertension, were lower in Mexican Americans than in non-Hispanic whites or in blacks, with whom they shared a remarkably similar risk profile. This effect was unchanged after adjustment for age, body mass index (weight (kg)/height (cm)2 x 100), and education, indicating that blood pressure differences between Mexican Americans, whites, and blacks were not explained by the established correlates of high blood pressure. There are several possible reasons for lower blood pressure in Mexican Americans, including genetic, life-style, and cultural factors.

This paper reports the results of a cross-sectional study conducted to evaluate the prevalence of hypertension in 1500 black and white male bus drivers from a large urban transit system in the US. Data for this study were compiled from the files of an occupational health clinic which conducts biennial medical examinations for drivers' license renewal. To test whether prevalence of hypertension was higher among bus drivers than among employed individuals in general, drivers were compared to three groups: individuals from both a national and local health survey and individuals undergoing baseline health examinations prior to employment as bus drivers. After adjustment for age and race, hypertension rates for bus drivers were significantly greater than rates for each of the three comparison groups. These findings support previous results from international studies of bus drivers suggesting that exposure to the occupation of driving a bus may carry increased health risk. This research has expanded into an on-going study which has the goals of clarifying the extent of hypertension in bus drivers and identifying specific behavioural and occupational factors that may be responsible for increased risk of cardiovascular disease.

This study examines the extent to which a set of 10 demographic, behavioral, and medical risk factors explain black/white differences in hypertension. Data are from a cross-sectional examination of San Francisco transit drivers aged 25-65 years surveyed during 1983-1985 as part of an occupational health study. The inherent restriction of the study population to bus drivers and the further restriction to males in this population (764 blacks and 224 whites) controlled for factors related to occupation and sex. Control of 10 additional potential risk factors, including age, education, body mass index, smoking, and intake of caffeine and alcohol was possible in the analytic phase of the study. The unadjusted prevalence of hypertension (systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mmHg, or current use of antihypertensive medications) was 36.1 per cent for black males compared with 30.8 per cent for white males. The greatest difference in prevalence was observed for black males aged 55-64 years, for whom the prevalence was 46 per cent higher than for white males the same age. Despite higher rates of hypertension, blacks in all age groups exhibited lower levels of most major risk factors for hypertension. As a result, the independent effect of race on hypertension was increased rather than attenuated when the 10 covariables were taken into account (odds ratio of 1.27 in the unadjusted analysis, increasing to 1.54 in the adjusted, multivariate analysis). That this set of risk factors did not explain the higher rates of hypertension among blacks suggests that racial differences may arise from as yet unrecognized environmental and/or individual factors. The results also indicate that the association between race and blood pressure may have been underestimated in past studies that have relied on unadjusted analyses, in which negative confounding or masking effects of covariables have not been considered.

This paper presents an analysis of self-reported stressors and blood pressure in a population of 1,428 San Francisco bus drivers surveyed from 1983 to 1985 as part of an occupational health study. To test the hypothesis of a positive association between psychosocial stressors and hypertension, the authors derived a stressor index from a survey instrument that assessed subjects' appraisal of work-related problems. A logistic regression analysis revealed an unexpected inverse association between the stressor index and hypertension that remained significant after adjustment for 12 potential confounding variables (standardized odds ratio = 0.84, p = 0.038). An analysis restricted to the 1,040 normotensive subjects, with mean blood pressure level as the outcome variable, also yielded inverse findings. To assess whether the results were specific to blood pressure, the authors repeated the multiple logistic analysis for gastrointestinal, respiratory, and musculoskeletal problems. In contrast to the inverse association found for hypertension, highly significant positive associations were found between the stressor index and these health problems. When prevalence of disease was examined by level of stressor score, a significant inverse gradient was observed for hypertension and significant positive gradients were observed for gastrointestinal, respiratory, and musculoskeletal problems (p values less than 0.001). An etiologic implication of these findings is that there may be a direct inverse association between subjective appraisal of stressors and blood pressure. A methodological implication is that subjective appraisal of stressors by persons with heightened blood pressure may be an invalid measure of objective, verifiable stressors.

Epidemiologic studies of blood pressure have been conducted for over twenty-five years, but the results of this research can only be described as modest. The basic epidemiologic and demographic description of blood pressure distributions in human populations remains problematic and psychosocial studies have not yielded clear and solid hypotheses pointing the way to future research. There is no doubt that blood pressures vary among and between population groups, and there seems little doubt that variations in life-style are associated with these differences. It is puzzling that we have failed to discern systematic and patterned relationships among these variables. It is suggested that a more useful approach to research in this field would be to distinguish factors that affect general susceptibility to becoming ill from those that initiate or maintain particular disease states.

San Francisco bus drivers have an increased prevalence of hypertension. This study examined relationships between blood lead concentration and blood pressure in 342 drivers. The analysis reported in this study was limited to subjects not on treatment for hypertension (n = 288). Systolic and diastolic pressures varied from 102 to 173 mm Hg and from 61 to 105 mm Hg, respectively. The blood lead concentration varied from 2 to 15 micrograms/dL. The relationship between blood pressure and the logarithm of blood lead concentration was examined using multiple regression analysis. Covariates included age, body mass index, sex, race, and caffeine intake. The largest regression coefficient relating systolic blood pressure and blood lead concentration was 1.8 mm Hg/ln (micrograms/dL) [90% C. I., -1.6, 5.3]. The coefficient for diastolic blood pressure was 2.5 mm Hg/ln (micrograms/dL) [90% C. I., 0.1, 4.9]. These findings suggest effects of lead exposure at lower blood lead concentrations than those concentrations that have previously been linked with increases in blood pressure.

1. To test whether prevalence of hypertension was higher among these bus drivers than among employed individuals in general, drivers were compared to three groups: individuals from both a national and local health survey and individuals undergoing baseline health exams prior to employment as bus drivers. 2. After adjustment for age and race, hypertension rates for bus drivers were significantly greater than rates for the three comparison groups. 3. These findings support previous results from international studies of bus drivers suggesting that exposure to the occupation of driving a bus may carry increased health risk.

A study of coronary heart disease (CHD) among Japanese migrants compared with Japanese living in Japan provided the opportunity to study factors possibly responsible for the high rates of CHD in America as compared with Japan. Comparable methods were employed in examining 11,900 men of Japanese ancestry aged 45--69 living in Japan, Hawaii and California. The age-adjusted prevalence rates for definite CHD as determined by ECG were: Japan 5.3, Hawaii 5.2 and California 10.8/1000. For definite plus possible CHD the rates were 25.4, 34.7 and 44.6. The prevalence of angina pectoris and pain of possible myocardial infarction, determined by questionnaire, showed a similar gradient. Elevated serum cholesterol showed a Japan-Hawaii-California gradient, but the prevalence of hypertension in Japan was intermediate between the prevalence in Hawaii and the higher prevalence in California. The three geographic locations were compared as to prevalence of CHD at comparable levels of blood pressure and cholesterol. At each blood pressure level and at each cholesterol level, the greater prevalence of CHD in California persisted. These facts, plus the near universality of smoking in Japan, suggest that conventional risk factors only partly explain the observed gradient in CHD.