Search

Introduction: The predictive value of heart rate (HR) assessed using an automated office blood pressure measurement (AOBPM) remains unknown., Objectives: This study aimed to determine the impact of AOBPM HR on the risk of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients with and without prior cardiovascular disease (CVD)., Patients and Methods: Data of 9361 participants of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (median follow‑up, 3.26 years) were used to perform a post hoc analysis based on baseline AOBPM HR levels (<50, 50-60, 60-70, 70-80, and >80 bpm). Clinical composite end point (CE) was defined as myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome other than MI, heart failure exacerbation, stroke, or cardiovascular death. Cardiovascular‑related and all‑cause mortalities were also evaluated., Results: A total of 1877 participants with and 7484 individuals without CVD were included. Those with higher baseline HR were less frequently men and more often smokers, had higher body mass index and estimated glomerular filtration rate, lower baseline systolic blood pressure, and higher diastolic blood pressure. No differences were observed in the CE frequency, its components, and all‑cause death between the baseline HR groups. Elevated HR (>70 bpm) was associated with a higher risk of CE, MI, and cardiovascular death in a multivariable Cox model. Moreover, the model determining the MI risk showed a J‑shaped relationship with HR and a significant interaction term (P = 0.049) between HR and CVD history., Conclusions: High AOBPM HR is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events and mortality, whereas low HR may result in higher MI risk in patients with previous CVD.

[Figure: see text].

Introduction: Optimal diastolic blood pressure (DBP) during antihypertensive treatment in patients without a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains unknown., Objectives: This post‑hoc analysis of the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) data aimed to determine the optimal DBP evaluated using automated office blood pressure measurements (AOBPM) in hypertensive patients without a history of CVD., Patients and Methods: Data of 1470 patients with CVD and 7117 patients without CVD were used. Clinical composite endpoint (CE) was defined as the occurrence of myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome other than myocardial infarction, decompensation of heart failure, stroke, or cardiovascular death. Two different approaches based on the hazard ratio plot were used to identify the optimal DBP range. The first approach was to determine the 10 mm Hg-wide DBP range with the lowest risk for CE. In the second approach, it was assumed that the hazard ratio of CE at the boundary points of the optimal DBP range should be the same in patients with and without CVD., Results: Two ranges of on-treatment DBP were proposed: 73.7 to 83.7 mm Hg (first approach) and 63.6 to 95.8 mm Hg (second approach). The risk for CE was increased by 3% and 20% at the boundary points of the range, respectively, depending on the method of DBP determination., Conclusions: Due to the fact that the range determined by the second method was wide and substantially different from the one recommended by the European Society of Cardiology (70-79 mm Hg), we have concluded that a DBP range of 73.7 to 83.7 mm Hg, measured using AOBPM, should be considered optimal in patients without CVD.

Automated office blood pressure measurement (AOBPM) is recommended for diagnosing hypertension; however, optimal treatment targets using this method are not established. Discrepancies between automated and office measurements of blood pressure have been described, producing uncertainty regarding the use of AOBPM in clinical practice. The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) results improved our understanding of target AOBPM systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels; however, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) targets remain unknown. Therefore, we sought to determine the optimal on-treatment DBP range. The analysis was performed on the participants of the SPRINT trial who had hypertension and prior cardiovascular disease. We analyzed the data of 1470 participants (mean age 70.3 ± 9.3 years, 24.1% female) selected from the SPRINT trial database of National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. The mean achieved SBP and DBP were 127.9 ± 10.7 and 68.3 ± 9.4 mm Hg, respectively. Most of the participants (57.4%) had a DBP lower than 70 mm Hg, while only 11.7% had DPB ≥80 mm Hg. Clinical composite endpoint was defined as myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome not resulting in myocardial infarction, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes. There were 159 (10.8%) clinical endpoint events. The participants with on-treatment AOBPM DBP range of 68.6-78.6 mm Hg showed the lowest hazard risk of a clinical composite endpoint. These results correspond to the office DBP range of 70-80 mm Hg recommended in ESC guidelines. This is the first attempt to determine the range of optimal DBP values using population-based AOBPM in patients with prior cardiovascular disease., (©2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background Hypertension is the most prevalent and leading risk factor for stroke. SPRINT (The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) assessed the effects on cardiovascular event risk of intensive compared with standard systolic blood pressure reduction. In this secondary analysis of SPRINT data, we investigated how low on-treatment diastolic blood pressure ( DBP ) influenced risk for stroke events. Methods and Results For this analysis, we used SPRINT &#95; POP (Primary Outcome Paper) Research Materials from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Biologic Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center. Data for 8944 SPRINT participants were analyzed from the period after target blood pressure was achieved until the end of the trial. Overall, there were 110 stroke events, including 49 from the intensive-treatment arm and 61 in the standard-treatment group. In participants with DBP <70 mm Hg, stroke risk was higher than with DBP ≥70 mm Hg (hazard ratio, 1.467; 95% CI 1.009-2.133; P=0.0445). Univariable Cox proportional hazard risk analysis showed that in the whole group, age and cardiovascular and chronic renal diseases were stroke risk factors. These risk factors were related to lower DBP and higher pulse pressure, however, not to study arm. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that only age, history of cardiovascular disease, current smoking status and on-treatment systolic blood pressure were significantly related to stroke risk. Conclusions Low on-treatment DBP is not related to the risk for the first stroke, in contrast to older age, the history of cardiovascular disease, current smoking status, and on-treatment systolic blood pressure. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 01206062.

Abstract: Tobacco dependence is a potent risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) diseases and, despite known harms of smoking and benefits associated with smoking cessation, approximately 20% of the adult population with CV diseases or hypertension continue to smoke. Extensive research has demonstrated that nicotine replacement, varenicline, and bupropion sustained-release are superior to placebo for short- and intermediate-term smoking cessation. Because of their mechanisms of action, some smoking cessation therapies have been thought to have the potential to increase CV risk, particularly if the pharmacotherapies are taken while individuals are still smoking. Hence, we have analytically reviewed the literature describing the CV effects of therapies for smoking cessation, particularly as they apply to patients with CV disease. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]