Search

Unlabelled: The aim of our study was to seek out a possible different reactiveness to cardiovascular stimulation tests among normotensives with and without positive family history of essential hypertension. We have studied about 200 inhabitants of Ustica and 49 medicine students, all normotensives according to the World Health Organization and the Joint National Committee criteria. In an isolated room and in a supine position, blood pressure (BP) and heart rate were measured every 30 s for 15 min with an automatic sphygmomanometer. Averages of last 4 measurements were considered baseline values. Then we have carried out mental stress (MS), handgrip and active orthostatism test (AO) in the inhabitants of Ustica; cold pressor test and AO in students. Patients were divided in 2 groups, genetics and controls, on the basis of a positive family history of essential hypertension. The 2 groups, in every sample, were similar for sex, age, body mass index and alimentary and life habits., Results: a preliminary estimation of Ustica sample showed a different prevalence of positive history between hypertensives and normotensives (63.9% vs 46.61%; p less than 0.05) and no difference between hypertensive and borderline patients (63.9% vs 64.2%); BP and heart rate were slightly higher in controls; there was no statistical difference between genetics and controls., Conclusions: our results can be explained in various ways: pressor dysregulation in candidates for hypertension may be masked in a large group of normotensives; exaggerated pressor response do not exist in genetics or this pressor dysregulation is impossible to find out with the cardiovascular stimulation tests we have used; other mechanisms are responsible for genetic hypertension.

We studied 45 hypertensive subjects to evaluate the usefulness of captopril test for identifying renal artery stenosis and small congenital kidney with the hypoplasia of the renal artery. In 18 hypertensives with hippuran renogram indicating renovascular disease, and in 27 essential hypertensives, the plasma renin activity (PRA) responses to an oral test dose (50 mg) of captopril were studied. A 60-minute post captopril PRA increase of 150% (or 400% if baseline PRA less than 3 ng/ml/h) was considered as positive. Digital venous angiography was performed in all cases. In the group of 18 subjects small congenital kidney in 7, and renal artery stenosis in 11 subjects were detected by angiography. Captopril test resulted negative in all patients with small congenital kidney (mean PRA% increase 58). The test identified 7 of the 11 renal artery stenoses (mean PRA% increase 477), sensitivity and specificity were 64% and 100% respectively. In the essential hypertensives-group, mean PRA% increase was 122; there were three false positives, and both sensitivity and specificity were 88%. This study demonstrates that the PRA response to oral captopril test is a useful screening test for distinguishing small congenital kidney from renal artery stenosis and for identifying the latter in hypertensive patients.

a group of 120 patients suffering from E.A.H. divided into three age Plasma renal flow was reduced on average in all three groups. It is t this fact could support the hypothesis that the change in renal per y a pathogenic role in E.A.H. ss F1/hlp F2/que F3/ext F4/can F5/nxt F6/ins F7/up F8/dwn F9/fin

Certain physiopathological features that differentiate essential arterial hypertension in normal weight and obese patients are recalled. The results of a retrospective study carried out in 293 hypertensive patients admitted to the Clinic in recent years are reported with a view to evaluating the prevalence of certain parameters (ischaemic cardiopathy, left ventricular hypertrophy, renal, vasculo-cerebral and retinal impairment) in patients subdivided into two groups: normal weight and obese. The study showed in the first group a higher prevalence of signs of ischaemic cardiopathy; in the second a higher prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy. This difference is accentuated in the subgroup of smokers as regards ischaemic cardiopathy and in non-smokers as regards left ventricular hypertrophy. The possible explanations for this different behaviour are discussed.