Search

The vasodilation induced by systemic insulin infusion is mediated by nitric oxide and is impaired both in obese subjects and patients with essential hypertension. Whether this vascular defect explains the metabolic resistance to insulin action is uncertain. In 8 overweight male patients with essential hypertension, we used the double forearm (ie, infused versus control) technique, combined with the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, to test whether sustained vasodilation (induced by intra-arterial sodium nitroprusside infusion) improves insulin-mediated glucose uptake. During the clamp, whole-body glucose disposal rose to 24.4+/-2.9 micromol x min(-1) x kg(-1). Forearm blood flow in the control forearm was stable (3.1+/-0.4 versus 2.9+/-0.3 mL x min[-1] x dL[-1]), while in the infused forearm it increased from 3.4+/-0.5 to 10.6+/-1.3 mL x min(-1) x dL(-1) in response to sodium nitroprusside. During insulin administration, tissue glucose extraction rose from 2+/-1% to 21+/-4% (P<.001) in the control forearm and from 2+/-1% to 8+/-3% in the infused forearm (P<.02 versus baseline for both); the calculated net glucose uptake reached similar plateaus in the two forearms (3.5+/-0.7 versus 3.7+/-0.6 micromol x min(-1) x kg(-1), control versus infused, P=.6). We conclude that in overweight male patients with essential hypertension, increasing forearm perfusion with sodium nitroprusside does not attenuate the insulin resistance of forearm tissues.

Microalbuminuria in patients with essential hypertension is a marker of incipient glomerular dysfunction and clusters with lipid and hemodynamic abnormalities. Recent evidence has shown that hypertensive patients with microalbuminuria have a hyperinsulinemic response to oral glucose, suggesting the presence of insulin resistance. To directly test this possibility we studied insulin action in two accurately matched groups (n = 10 each) of hypertensive patients with or without microalbuminuria (14 +/- 2 versus 52 +/- 7 mg/24 h-1, mean of three 24-hour collections). In response to glucose ingestion microalbuminuric patients showed slight hyperglycemia (area under the curve, 928 +/- 43 versus 784 +/-19 nmol/L-1/2h-1, P < .02) and a marked hyperinsulinemia (26.8 +/- 3.3 versus 49.8 +/- 3.7 nmol/L-1/2h-1, P < 0.01). Basal arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and forearm blood flow were similar in the two groups and did not change significantly during a 2-hour euglycemic insulin clamp. Insulin-stimulated wholebody glucose uptake was 25% lower in microalbuminuric patients (33.5 +/- 2.5 versus 25.2 +/- 2.1 mumol/min-1/kg-1, P < .02). This difference was entirely due to a 40% reduction in glycogen synthesis (12.9 +/- 1.8 versus 21.3 +/- 3.2 mumol/min-1/kg-1, P < .05) as glucose oxidation was similarly stimulated in the two groups. In contrast there was no difference in the ability of insulin to suppress hepatic glucose production (by approximately 100% at the end of the clamp), to decrease fractional sodium and potassium excretions (by 35%), to lower circulating free fatty acids (by 80%), and to reduce plasma potassium concentrations (by 10%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

1. Insulin simultaneously causes hypokalaemia and antinatriuresis, and it has been suggested that the two effects are tightly coupled. Whether these actions are preserved in patients with essential hypertension is not known. 2. Eight hypertensive patients and eight normotensive control subjects were studied before and after the ingestion of 75 g of glucose. Despite similar glycaemic profiles, the patients showed a hyperinsulinaemic response incremental area 49 +/- 8 versus 27 +/- 6 nmol l-1 3 h, P < 0.04) but a blunted hypokalaemic response (-7 +/- 1 versus -16 +/- 1%, P < 0.001). Both absolute and fractional urinary excretion of sodium and potassium were significantly decreased during glucose-induced hyperinsulinaemia in hypertensive patients as well as in normotensive subjects (P < 0.05 for all changes). 3. To test whether hypokalaemia is required for insulin-induced antinatriuresis, each hypertensive patient received another oral glucose load during which enough potassium chloride was given to clamp the plasma potassium concentration at baseline. Under these conditions, significant insulin-induced antinatriuresis still occurred. In addition, whereas the glycaemic profile was superimposable, the response of the plasma insulin concentration was significantly greater with than without maintenance of the plasma potassium concentration (total area 79 +/- 14 versus 63 +/- 8 nmol l-1 3 h, P < 0.04). 4. We conclude that (a) insulin causes antinatriuresis, antikaliuresis and hypokalaemia under physiological conditions; (b) in hyperinsulinaemic (insulin-resistant) patients with essential hypertension, the antinatriuretic action of insulin is quantitatively preserved; and (c) clamping plasma potassium levels prevents insulin-induced antikaliuresis but not antinatriuresis, and potentiates the insulin secretory response to glucose.