Search

Introduction: Clinical data of esaxerenone in hypertensive patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) are lacking. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of esaxerenone in patients with DKD and an inadequate response to blood pressure (BP)-lowering treatment., Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, prospective study, patients were divided into urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio subcohorts (UACR < 30, 30 to < 300, and 300 to < 1000 mg/gCr). Esaxerenone was initiated at 1.25 mg/day and followed by incremental dose escalation based on BP and serum potassium level monitoring. The treatment period was 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in morning home systolic BP/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP) from baseline to end of treatment (EOT). Secondary endpoints included achievement rate of target BP, change in UACR from baseline, and safety., Results: In total, 113 patients were enrolled. Morning home SBP/DBP significantly decreased from baseline to EOT in the total population (- 11.6/- 5.2 mmHg, both p < 0.001) and in all UACR subcohorts (all p < 0.001). The target BP achievement rate was 38.5%. Significant reductions in bedtime home and office BPs were also shown in the total population and all UACR subcohorts. UACR significantly improved from baseline to EOT in the total (- 50.9%, p < 0.001) and all UACR subcohorts (all p < 0.001). Incidence of serum potassium elevation as drug-related treatment emergent adverse events was 2.7%. The change from baseline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was - 4.8 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ., Conclusion: Esaxerenone demonstrated a BP-lowering effect and improved albuminuria. The effects were consistent regardless of the severity of albuminuria without clinically relevant serum potassium elevation and eGFR reduction., Clinical Trial Registration: jRCTs06119002., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background : Hyperuricemia is a risk factor for the development of hypertension and is comorbid in many hypertensive patients. According to Japanese hypertension management guidelines published in 2019, a target serum uric acid level of ≤6.0 mg/dL is recommended in hypertensive patients with gout or asymptomatic hyperuricemia. Dotinurad is a novel uric acid-lowering drug classified as a selective urate reabsorption inhibitor. A pooled analysis was performed on the uric acid-lowering effect of dotinurad in 222 hypertensive patients with gout or asymptomatic hyperuricemia in four clinical trials (NCT02344862, NCT02416167, NCT03100318, NCT03372200). Moreover, we analyzed the long-term uric acid-lowering effect of dotinurad in 154 hypertensive patients with gout or asymptomatic hyperuricemia (NCT03006445). Results : In the pooled analysis, the percent change in the decrease of serum uric acid with the use of dotinurad was 42.17 ± 12.42% at a dose of 2 mg and 60.42 ± 8.03% at a dose of 4 mg; the percentage of patients who achieved a serum uric acid level of ≤6.0 mg/dL was 82.8% and 100.0%. The long-term uric acid-lowering effect of dotinurad showed almost the same results. In this study, the concomitant use of diuretics or angiotensin II receptor blockers affected the uric acid-lowering effect of dotinurad at only a dose of 2 mg in the pooled analysis. Conclusions : In the pooled analysis, dotinurad lowered serum uric acid levels. Dotinurad has an achievement rate of over 80% for serum uric acid level of ≤6.0 mg/dL in both analyses, and will be clinically useful for the management of hyperuricemic states in hypertensive patients.

Aim: The present study explored the gender interaction on the risk of uric acid in the new development of hypertension., Study Design: A longitudinal retrospective cohort., Subjects & Methods: A total of 5,807 individuals with an average age of 38 ± 7 years old were recruited. Individuals whose blood pressure rose more than 140/90mmHg or those who newly commenced antihypertensive treatment were defined as a new onset of hypertension. Cox regression analysis was employed for the analysis., Results: During the 10-years follow-up, 42.8% of men and 22.2% of women had developed hypertension. Factors to predict the hypertension development were male gender, older age, higher BMI, higher uric acid, and higher mean blood pressure. An association between higher uric acid levels and higher incidence of hypertension remained statistically significant in women in a multivariate model adjusted for various clinical variables (Hazard ration (HR), 1.180; 95%CI, 1.018 to 1.369), whereas such association was not found in men (HR, 1.034; 95%CI, 0.994 to 1.075). The interaction between the two genders reached statistical significance (p for interaction = 0.007)., Conclusion: Higher uric acid is associated with the incident hypertension in the both genders. Women are more susceptible to the development of hypertension than men.

Background: Applying a direct renin inhibitor (DRI) to advanced stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is a matter of controversy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the DRI, aliskiren, in patients with therapy-resistant hypertension undergoing hemodialysis (HD)., Methods: The study was a prospective, randomized multicenter trial exploring the antihypertensive effect of aliskiren in comparison with amlodipine, a calcium channel blocker, in patients undergoing HD. A total of 83 participants whose blood pressure (BP) had previously been treated with more than one antihypertensive agent and not having achieved the BP goal of <140/90 mmHg were randomly assigned to either aliskiren 150 mg or amlodipine 5 mg as an add-on therapy., Results: A significant decrease in pre-dialysis clinic BP and home BP was found only in the amlodipine group and not in the aliskiren group. In contrast, there was a significant decrease in atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) in the aliskiren group but not in the amlodipine group. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic hormone remained unchanged in both groups. Aliskiren significantly reduced angiotensin I and II, plasma renin activity, and increased plasma renin content. However, such changes were not observed in the amlodipine group., Conclusion: Amlodipine, not aliskiren, effectively reduces BP in CKD patients with refractory hypertension undergoing HD. Aliskiren suppresses the renin-angiotensin system and reduces ANP. Whether the DRI is beneficial in improving cardiovascular events in patients undergoing HD remains to be elucidated in future studies.

This study aimed to clarify the relationship between blood pressure (BP, mm Hg) measured by patients in the morning at home and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), which is a strong predictor for morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular disease in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). We recorded self-measured morning BPs and BPs measured at hospital check-ups (hospital BPs) in 33 patients undergoing CAPD (mean age, 64.0 years) and compared them with left ventricular mass (LVM) derived from echocardiographic examinations. The mean morning BP was 137/75, the mean hospital BP was 140/80, and the mean LVM (g/m(2.7) : corrected by height) was 61.8. Of the subjects, 72.7% had LVH (LVM > 51). The morning BP (systolic) was positively correlated with LVM (P = 0.0022, R = 0.508), and the hospital BP (systolic) was weakly correlated (P = 0.0534, R = 0.339). The adjusted odds ratio for LVH was significantly higher in patients with a morning BP (systolic) ≥ 135 (15.9; 95% CI, 1.3 to 198.5) than in patients with a morning BP (systolic) < 135. In conclusion, morning hypertension determined with self-measured BP was positively correlated with LVH, therefore self BP monitoring could be a useful method to predict LVH in CAPD patients., (© 2012 The Authors. Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis © 2012 International Society for Apheresis.)

Background: Hypertension is a leading cause of cardiovascular (CV) disease in the general population. Although hypertension is very common in maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients, adequate blood pressure (BP) values and measurement timing have not been defined., Methods: A total of 49 hypertensive HD patients were recruited. Average age was 63 ± 11 years, and duration of dialysis therapy was 6.2 ± 4.2 years. Dialysis unit BPs and various types of home BPs were separately measured, and which BPs were the most critical markers in evaluating the effect of hypertension on left ventricular hypertrophy and CV events was investigated., Results: Predialysis systolic BPs were not correlated with any home BPs. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) had a significant positive correlation with home BPs, especially morning systolic BPs on HD days (P < 0.01) and non-HD days (P < 0.05), on univariate and multivariate analysis. In contrast, predialysis BPs did not correlate with LVMI. During the follow-up period (47 ± 18 months), it was demonstrated that diabetes and home BPs, especially systolic BPs on the morning of HD days, were significant predictors of CV events on multivariate Cox regression analysis. A 10 mmHg increase in BP had a significantly elevated relative risk for CV events., Conclusions: Home BP, especially systolic BPs in the morning on HD days, can provide pivotal information for management of HD patients.

Background: Achieving adequate blood pressure (BP) control often requires more than one antihypertensive agent. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a fixed-dose formulation of losartan (LOS) plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) (LOS/HCTZ) is effective in achieving a greater BP lowering in patients with uncontrolled hypertension., Methods: The study was a prospective, multicenter, observational trial exploring the antihypertensive effect of a single tablet of LOS 50 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg. A total of 228 patients whose BP had previously been treated with more than one antihypertensive agents without having achieved BP goal below 130/80 mmHg enrolled in the study., Results: A significant decrease in systolic and diastolic BP was observed in both clinic and home measurement after switching from the previous treatment to LOS/HCTZ. There was a significant decrease in both B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and urinary albumin creatinine (Cr) excretion ratio (ACR), especially in patients with elevated values. In contrast, there was a significant increase in serum Cr concentration in conjunction with a decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Overall serum uric acid (UA) concentration increased, whereas in patients with hyperuricemia there was a significant reduction in this value., Conclusion: Switching to LOS/HCTZ provides a greater reduction in clinic and home BP in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. This combination therapy may lead to cardio-, reno protection and improve UA metabolism.

Objective: The Jikei Optimal Antihypertensive Treatment (JOINT) study originally evaluated the effect of a fixed-dose formulation of losartan (LOS) (50 mg) plus 12.5 hydrochrolthiazide (HCTZ) for achieving better blood pressure (BP) control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. This study is a sub-analysis of the JOINT study, focusing on the effect of LOS/HCTZ on the uric acid (UA) metabolism., Methods: Among 228 participants in the JOINT study, a total of 164 patients whose blood and urinary UA specimens were available were included in the present analyses., Results: Six months after switching from the prior antihypertensive agent(s) to a single tablet formulation of LOS/HCTZ, the overall serum UA concentration (sUA) increased from 6.0 ± 1.6 mg/dL to 6.2 ± 1.6 mg/dL (p=0.029). The urinary UA/creatinine (Cr) ratio increased from 0.45 +/- 0.21 to 0.50 +/- 0.25 (p=0.014), and the fractional excretion of UA (FEUA) also increased, from 7.1 +/- 3.6 to 7.0 +/- 4.3, p=0.04). Multivariate regression analyses of the basal parameters showed the change in sUA (ΔUA) to correlate with the basal sUA (β=-0.483, p<0.001), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (β=-0.202, p=0.007) and systolic BP (β=0.147, p=0.038). In addition, the ΔUA also correlated with the changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (ΔeGFR) (β=-0.332, p<0.001). When the patients were classified into two groups depending on their basal sUA, those with a basal sUA ≥ 7 mg/dL exhibited a decrease in their sUA, whereas the rest of those with a sUA <7 mg/dL experienced an increase. Furthermore, patients who had previously been treated with LOS alone had a greater increase in the sUA than those treated with an angiotensin II blocker (ARB) other than LOS alone., Conclusion: Antihypertensive therapy with a single tablet formulation of LOS/HCTZ is considered to be a useful option for controlling both BP and sUA, especially in uncontrolled hypertensive patients with hyperuricemia.

A 38-year-old female patient on peritoneal dialysis (PD) due to type 1 diabetic nephropathy with a well-preserved residual renal function did not respond well to the conventional antihypertensive therapy consisting of candesartan, furosemide, and bunazosin. Switching candesartan for a fixed combination formula of candesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) while the rest of the other two agents remained unchanged led to the remarkable reduction in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) without significant changes in the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR), body weight (BW), and residual renal function. This case suggests that when used in combination, diuretics acting on different functional segment of the nephron hold greater potential for enhanced antihypertensive effect, especially in patients on PD whose residual renal function is well preserved. A small dose of HCTZ with an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) may partially explain the therapeutic benefit of this combination therapy in terms of a reliable hypotensive effect, a better adherence, and fewer side effects.

Purpose: To evaluate whether a dose increase in angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) or in calcium channel blocker (CCB) is useful for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients who do not reach their target blood pressure with ARB/CCB combined therapy., Methods: The antihypertensive effect and the influence on the renal function were compared by 12 weeks each of a valsartan (VAL) dose uptitration period (VAL 160 mg + NCR 20 mg) and a nifedipine CR (NCR) dose uptitration period(VAL 80 mg+NCR 40 mg) using a crossover method in 31 CKD patients whose blood pressure did not reach the targeted BP with combined therapy with the standard dose of VAL 80 mg and NCR 20 mg., Results: The office SBP and early morning SBP at 12 weeks after the dose uptitration of NCR were significantly lower than the values at 12 weeks after the dose uptitration of VAL. The proportion of patients who achieved the targeted BP during the dose uptitration period of NCR was higher compared with that during the dose uptitration period of VAL. The urinary albumin excretion (UAE) reduced significantly during the dose titration period of NCR. However, the reduction of UAE was not significant during the dose uptitration period of VAL. The change in eGFR was not observed during either of the dose uptitration periods compared with the baseline. Significant correlation between the morning BP and UAE was observed during the dose titration period of NCR. On the other hand, the correlation was not observed during the VAL titration period., Conclusion: In hypertensive patients with CKD who do not achieve their target BP with ARB/CCB combined therapy, a dose increase of CCB would be preferable to that of ARB from the viewpoint of strict control of BP and renal protection.

Objectives: Methylglyoxal, a metabolite of the glycolysis pathway, may play an important role in the development of diabetes and hypertension, but the exact mechanism has not been fully elucidated. The present study was designed to investigate whether methylglyoxal could directly induce insulin resistance and salt sensitivity in Sprague-Dawley rats., Methods: Rats were allocated to four groups: control (normal drinking water), 1% methylglyoxal in drinking water, 1% methylglyoxal plus N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) (800 mg/kg per day), a methylglyoxal scavenger, or TM2002 (100 mg/kg per day), an advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) inhibitor. After 4-week treatment insulin resistance was evaluated by an euglycemic hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp technique. In another set of rats, either a high-salt diet (4%) alone, standard rat chow with 1% methylglyoxal in drinking water or high-salt diet plus methylglyoxal was given for 4 weeks. Immunohistochemistry was performed to measure nitrotyrosine and methylglyoxal-induced AGEs, N-carboxyethyl-lysine (CEL) in the kidney., Results: Four-week treatment with NAC or TM2002 completely improved methylglyoxal-induced insulin resistance. Co-administration of methylglyoxal and high-salt diet significantly increased systolic blood pressure, urinary albumin excretion, urinary thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances excretion and the renal nitrotyrosine expression in the kidney (markers of oxidative stress) compared with methylglyoxal or high-salt diet alone. Renal CEL was significantly increased in methylglyoxal-treated rats compared with nonmethylglyoxal-treated rats., Conclusion: These results indicate that methylglyoxal-induced insulin resistance and salt sensitivity at least in part by increasing oxidative stress and/or AGEs formation in Sprague-Dawley rats. The present study provides further evidence for methylglyoxal as one of the causative factors in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and salt-sensitive hypertension.

Objective: Insulin resistance may contribute to the pathogenesis of hypertension and progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD), however, few clinical studies have explored the role of insulin resistance in predicting the deterioration of renal function in CKD patients., Materials and Methods: Enrolled in the study were non-diabetic hypertensive patients with CKD Stage 3. Insulin resistance was assessed by a homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-R) measured at the entry to the study. Patients were followed for 3 years and comparisons of renal and metabolic parameters were made in conjunction with HOMA-R between entry and the end of the study period. The insulin-resistant (IR) group was defined as patients with HOMA-R 2.0 and more, and the insulin-sensitive (IS) group as those with HOMA-R < 2.0., Results: Blood pressure in both groups was equally controlled below 130/80 mmHg throughout the observation period. The degree of insulin resistance HOMA-R and immunoreactive insulin (IRI) remained unchanged in the IS group, however, both were ameliorated in the IR group (HOMA-R, from 3.4 +/- 1.5 - 3.0 +/- 1.1, p = 0.022 and IRI, from 14.4 +/- 6.1 microU/ml - 12.6 +/- 6.8 microU/ml, p = 0.012). Creatinine clearance (CCr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) decreased and serum creatinine (Cr) concentration increased in all patients. The decline in CCr calculated as the slope of the reciprocal of serum Cr concentration (1/Cr) was greater in the IR group (0.007 +/- 0.004 (1/Cr/dl/mg/month) than in the IS group (0.003 +/- 0.002 (1/Cr/dl/mg/month), p < 0.001). Linear regression analysis showed that the slope of 1/Cr was negatively correlated with HOMA-R, IRI, BMI, respectively. Furthermore, stepwise regression analysis showed that the independent variables to explain the decline in renal function were HOMA-R and IRI., Conclusion: Insulin resistance is a significant risk factor for the deterioration of renal function in hypertensive non-diabetic patients with CKD.

Background: The angiotensin receptor blocker losartan inhibited urate transporter 1 (URAT1) according to in vitro experiments. However, it is still unknown whether the inhibitory effect of losartan on URAT1 contributes to its uricosuric action in humans., Methods: Thirty-two patients with hypertension and nine patients with idiopathic renal hypouricemia (five with and four without hypertension) were enrolled for this study. Hypertensive patients were prescribed oral losartan (50 mg/day, n = 16) or candesartan (8 mg/day, n = 16). Before and after 1-month treatment, the serum concentration of urate (Sur) and creatinine (Scr), and the clearance value of urate (Cur) and creatinine (Ccr) were determined. Clearance studies using the URAT1 inhibitor benzbromarone (100 mg/day) or losartan (50 mg/day) loading test were also performed in these patients., Results: Blood pressure (BP) significantly decreased in the patients treated with either losartan or candesartan. Losartan significantly reduced Sur, which was associated with a concomitant increase in the Cur/Ccr ratio, whereas candesartan did not alter these parameters. In hypertensive patients with loss-of-function mutation of URAT1, losartan did not alter either Sur or Cur/Ccr, nor did benzbromarone. The lack of effect of URAT1 inhibitors on renal excretion of urate was independent of the renal function of hypouricemic patients. On the other hand, both losartan and benzbromarone increased Cur/Ccr ratio in hypertensive patients harboring the wild URAT1 gene, regardless of the presence of hypouricemia., Conclusions: These findings suggested that losartan inhibited URAT1 and thereby it lowered Sur levels in hypertensive patients.

Background: Correction of anemia by erythropoietin (EPO) is often associated with a rise in blood pressure (BP; EPO-induced hypertension). Most studies regarding EPO-induced hypertension have involved evaluation using office/clinic BP (OBP). However, recent investigations suggest that BP measured at home (HBP) may be of more importance for clinical practice in hypertension. In this context, the present study addressed whether or not HBP measured in the morning could be useful to predict EPO-induced hypertension., Methods: The study involved patients with mild to moderate renal impairment who had renal anemia requiring EPO treatment. BP control was evaluated based on the relationship between OBP and HBP in the morning. The BP categories used were well-controlled BP, poorly controlled BP, hypertension with a white-coat effect (white-coat hypertension), and masked hypertension. Comparison was made of the BP categories before and after EPO treatment., Results: Before EPO treatment, 38% of patients had well-controlled BP, 30% had poorly controlled BP, 20% had masked hypertension, and 12% had white-coat hypertension, revealing a predominance of morning hypertension (poorly controlled BP plus masked hypertension). Following EPO treatment, the prevalence of morning hypertension in patients with masked hypertension and poorly controlled BP increased significantly, by 5% (HBP in those with masked hypertension increased from 152 +/- 18 mmHg to 162 +/- 25 mmHg, and HBP in those with poorly controlled BP increased from 157 +/- 18 mmHg to 168 +/- 25 mmHg; P < 0.05 by paired t-test). And there was a significant decrease in the prevalence of the well-controlled category, by 8%, with an increased level of morning HBP (from 128 +/- 14 mmHg to 137 +/- 16 mmHg; P < 0.05 by paired t-test). In contrast, OBP remained unchanged in all groups. The development of EPO-induced hypertension was effectively predicted by HBP in the morning (from 62% to 72% before and after EPO treatment; P = 0.0031 by Wilcoxon's analysis), but not by OBP (from 42% to 47% before and after treatment; P = 0.1399)., Conclusions: The present study indicates that, despite receiving concurrent antihypertensive therapy, the majority of patients with renal disease had morning hypertension. Furthermore, HBP in the morning can be more useful than OBP to predict the development of EPO-induced hypertension in patients with renal anemia.

Blood pressure (BP) measured at home early in the morning (HBP) has been recognized as a useful predictor for organ damage and has been viewed as an important therapeutic target in patients with hypertension. The present study was aimed to determine whether this notion holds true in patients with progressive renal disease. The study enrolled patients with mild to moderate renal impairment. They were all directed to record self-measured HBP to evaluate the adequacy of BP control. In addition to the conventional antihypertensive therapy, intensive treatment to more efficiently reduce elevated morning HBP was applied, especially in patients with diabetic nephropathy. The results were as follows: 1) The status of BP control assessed using HBP and office/clinic BP (OBP) shows predominance of morning hypertension. The prevalence of patients with well-controlled systolic HBP was 38%, those with poorly-controlled HBP 30%, masked hypertension 20% and white coat hypertension 12%. 2) Early morning systolic HBP in diabetics was significantly higher than that in non-diabetics. However, when evaluated on systolic OBP, both groups were comparable.3)Logistic regression analysis showed that the predictive variables to explain morning hypertension (more than 130 mmHg and increased systolic HBP) were age, amount of daily urinary protein excretion and left ventricular mass index (LVMI).4)Following conventional therapy, intensive antihypertensive therapy consisting of calcium channel blockers (CCB) and/or diuretics given in the morning, and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) given in the evening, together with alpha1-blockers given at bedtime, efficaciously reduced elevated HBP in the morning. This result was associated with significant reduction in daily urinary protein excretion and in serum plasminogen-activator inhibitor (PAI-1) concentration. The present study indicates that, regardless of ongoing conventional antihypertensive therapy, the majority of patients with renal disease had morning hypertension, suggesting that these patients are at a higher risk for cardiovascular disease. For the purpose of improving morning hypertension, intensive treatments with combined CCB, ARB and alpha1-blockers could have substantial benefit on the morbidity and prognosis in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Due to excessive salt and water retention, hypertension often becomes refractory in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). Management of high blood pressure (BP) appears to be of particular importance in such patients because of its substantial impact on the patients' prognosis. However, attempts to control hypertension in PD patients have not been successful in most cases. In this regard, the present study aimed to address the adequacy of current antihypertensive therapy for PD patients. A new antihypertensive strategy expected to improve the outcome was tested on the assumption that treatment with either angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in the evening together with alpha1-blocker at bed time and long-acting Ca channel blocker (CCB) in the morning might ameliorate BP control associated with morning hypertension. Enrolled in the present study were 40 patients whose BP was evaluated by both office and home measurement. Due to an emerging concern about morning hypertension, home BP measured early in the morning was used for the analysis. Each patient was categorized into the following four groups in accordance with office and home BP: well-controlled, poorly-controlled, white-coat and masked (opposite to white-coat), hypertension. After the observation period, 28 patients with refractory hypertension were allocated to intensive antihypertensive therapy in which ARB or ACE-I previously prescribed in the morning or daytime was shifted to the night. In addition, alpha1-blocker was given at bed time. Furthermore, long-acting CCB and diuretics were shifted to the morning. The patients were then followed up for 4-6 months. The results were as follows: 1) Of the total number of 40 PD patients, systolic hypertension was noted in 50% of cases by office BP and in 80% by home BP. The former was less frequent than the latter (p=0.0047, n=40). Similarly, diastolic hypertension was noted in 20% by office BP and in 45% by home BP. The former was less frequent than the latter (p=0.0045, n=40 by McNemar's analysis). The distribution of BP control categories was well-controlled in 11%, poorly-controlled in 42%, masked hypertension in 39% and white-coat hypertension in 8% when determined by systolic BP. The distribution was well-controlled in 45%, poorly-controlled in 13%, masked hypertension in 34% and white-coat hypertension in 8% of cases when determined by diastolic BP. 2) In 28 patients subjected to the intensive therapy, the control category of systolic BP was changed from 11 to 37% in well-controlled cases, from 42 to 30% in poorly-controlled cases, from 39 to 26% in masked hypertension cases and from 8 to 7% in white-coat hypertension cases. The shift in categories in both poorly-controlled and masked hypertension cases to the better category (well-controlled), was statistically significant (p=0.001, by Wilcoxon's signed rank test). Similarly, the control category of diastolic BP was changed from 45 to 43% in well-controlled cases, from 13 to 15% in poorly-controlled cases, from 34 to 32% in masked hypertension cases and from 8 to 10% in white-coat hypertension cases. There was a tendency for the prevalence of poorly-controlled and masked hypertension to improve to the well-controlled category in response to intensive therapy (p=0.0625, by Wilcoxon's signed rank test). 3) The plasma concentration of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1)/tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) complex (total PAI-1 complex) was significantly decreased after intensive therapy (17.3+/-7.8 ng/ml vs. 13.5+/-4.6 ng/ml, n=28, p<0.01 by paired t-test). In contrast, the plasma concentration of t-PA was unchanged even after intensive therapy (4.8+/-3.9 ng/ml vs. 6.2+/-2.9 ng/ml, n=28, ns). These data suggest that home BP obtained in the morning is a useful measure for evaluating morning hypertension in PD patients, most of whom have refractory hypertension categorized as either poorly-controlled or masked hypertension. Intensive treatment with ACE-I/ARB given in the evening along with alpha1-blocker at bed time combined with a diuretic and/or long-acting CCB in the morning is efficacious in controlling the BP of patients with refractory hypertension in PD patients. The link between the reduction in plasma total PAI-1 levels and the intensive therapy may suggest that this therapeutic strategy could prevent thrombotic events associated with morning hypertension in patients on PD.

Combined antihypertensive therapy plays a crucial role in achieving targeted blood pressure reductions and renoprotection. We therefore compared the antihypertensive and antiproteinuric effects of combined therapy with either a calcium channel blocker (CCB) plus an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) or an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) plus an ARB in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated by overt nephropathy and mild to moderate hypertension. After a 12-week dietary control period, diabetic patients with mildly to moderately impaired renal function were randomly assigned to either a CCB (amlodipine 5 mg once daily) or an ACE-I (temocapril 2 mg once daily) for 12 weeks (monotherapy period). Both groups then received add-on therapy with an ARB (candesartan 4 mg once daily) for an additional 12 weeks. During the monotherapy period, blood pressure was decreased equally well in both groups. Daily urinary protein excretion remained unchanged in the CCB-treated group (control period, 4.0 +/- 1.8 g/day vs. CCB period, 4.1 +/- 1.9 g/day; ns; n = 8), but decreased in the ACE-I-treated group (control period, 4.3 +/- 1.8 g/day vs. ACE-I period, 3.5 +/- 1.7 g/day; p < 0.05; n = 9). After the combined therapy period, blood pressure was decreased to the same degree in both groups. Although ARB plus CCB significantly reduced urinary protein excretion (to 3.5 +/- 1.5 g/day; p < 0.05 vs. control period; n = 8), a more profound reduction was achieved with ARB plus ACE-I (to 2.6 +/- 1.3 g/day; p < 0.01 vs. control period; n = 9). Monotherapy with the ACE-I increased the serum potassium concentration, and this elevation was sustained after addition of the ARB. In contrast, the serum potassium concentration was not influenced by monotherapy with the CCB, but was significantly increased after addition of the ARB. A decreased hematocrit was observed in the ARB plus ACE-I group. The present study suggests that combined antihypertensive therapy with either a CCB plus an ARB or an ACE-I plus an ARB exerts an antiproteinuric effect in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy with mildly impaired renal function. Although the latter combination had a more profound effect, it was associated with an increased serum potassium concentration and worsening of renal anemia. Thus, the combination of a CCB and an ARB should be the first line antihypertensive therapy in those with overt diabetic nephropathy. The long-term efficacy of these combined antihypertensive therapies will need to be further addressed in a future study.

The periodic structure of 24-hour blood pressure variation(circadian rhythm of blood pressure by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring(ABPM) in hypertensive CAPD patients was investigated by a new method of analysis based upon the maximum entropy method(MEM). In addition, this method allows the adequacy of antihypertensive therapies to be evaluated in such patients. The results were as follows; 1) The frequency of non-dipper type hypertension was 88%(36/41 cases), and the remaining 12% (5/41) were dipper type hypertension patients. The rise in morning blood pressure(morning surge: MS) was noted in 64% of the former. 2) Night time systolic blood pressure(182 +/- 22 mmHg, n = 36) was higher in patients with non-dipper type hypertension than in those with the dipper type(151 +/- 17 mmHg, n = 5, p < 0.01). 3) The standardized level of systolic blood pressure(SLSBP) calculated by MEM analysis in patients with non-dipper type hypertension(177 +/- 7 mmHg) was comparable with that in those with dipper type hypertension(168 +/- 13 mmHg, ns). 4) Treatment with long-acting Ca antagonist alone significantly reduced both SLSBP and the area over the SLSBP from 188 +/- 18 mmHg to 160 +/- 7 mmHg(p < 0.01, n = 8), and area over the SLSBP from 2,735 +/- 340 mmHg.hr to 1,945 +/- 298 mmHg.hr(p < 0.01, n = 8). 5) In addition to long-acting Ca antagonist, administration of alpha 1-blocker given at bed time was significantly efficacious in reducing the rise in morning blood pressure, MS. The present study using MEM analysis of ABPM suggests that the blood pressure profile of hypertensive CAPD patients is characterized by a non-dipper type dominance and a frequent morning surge. Furthermore, the combined therapy with long-acting Ca antagonist and alpha 1-blocker was substantially effective both in reducing the overall blood pressure level, and in inhibiting the MS. This combined antihypertensive therapy may be potentially useful to prevent CAPD patients from the future development of cardiovascular complications.

Levels of adrenomedullin (AM) have been shown to be elevated in hypertension and chronic renal failure, suggesting that AM plays a role in the pathogenesis of these diseases. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether circulating AM is involved in erythropoietin (Epo)-induced hypertension in patients with renal anemia due to progressive renal disease. Following treatment with 6,000 IU of Epo once a week, the hematocrit (Ht) rose significantly from 25.9+/-4.0 to 33.4+/-3.3% (n=54, p<0.001) with an overall rate of increase in Ht of 0.43+/-0.04%/week. In response to treatment with Epo, a rise in mean blood pressure of >10 mmHg (Epo-induced hypertension) was found in 22% (12/54 cases) of the patients enrolled. There was no difference in the rate of Ht increase between patients with and without Epo-induced hypertension. There was a significant positive correlation between mature AM and serum creatinine (Cr) concentration before treatment with Epo. However, no correlation was found between the plasma concentration of total AM and serum Cr concentration. Long-term treatment with Epo did not influence plasma concentration of either mature AM or total AM in patients developing hypertension during the study period. These results suggest that circulating AM may play a role in the progression of renal disease. However, the present study does not support the notion that circulating AM is associated with the pathogenesis of Epo-induced hypertension. It is too early yet to claim that there is no AM-mediated mechanism in Epo-induced hypertension.

Nitric oxide (NO) has some relevance to the pathophysiology of hypertension. We examined the distribution of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (ecNOS4) gene polymorphism in patients with essential hypertension (n = 107) in comparison with healthy subjects (n = 362), and then studied the possibility that ecNOS4 gene polymorphism affects changes in blood pressure (BP) due to water load in hemodialysis patients. Though the NO metabolite (NOx) level in subjects with the a allele (31.2 +/- 1.76 micromol/l) was significantly lower than in those without the a allele (35.6 +/- 0.90 micromol/l) (p = 0.0263), we found no association between this gene polymorphism and essential hypertension. However, there still remains the possibility that the NO response to elevation of BP might be suppressed in patients with hypertension. In order to examine the association between ecNOS4 gene polymorphism and volume-dependent hypertension, 181 hemodialysis patients with complete anuria were recruited. Depending on the increase in mean BP (mm Hg) divided by percent increase in body weight (deltaBP/deltaBW), patients were divided into high responders (High-R: deltaBP/deltaBW >2.0 mm Hg; n = 90) and low responders (Low-R: deltaBP/deltaBW <2.0 mm Hg; n = 91). In the High-R group, the frequencies of a/a, b/a and b/b genotypes were 1.1, 32.1 and 66.8%, respectively, and in the Low-R group, these frequencies were 1.1, 9.4 and 89.5%, respectively. The relative risk for those in the High-R group conferred by the ecNOS4 a allele (b/a + a/a) was 3.64 (95% confidence intervals: 1.60-8.24, p = 0.0089). This study did not show a strong involvement of ecNOS4 gene polymorphism, at least in the basal NO production in patients with essential hypertension, however, it indicated that ecNOS4 gene polymorphism might modulate changes in BP due to water load in patients on hemodialysis, thus indicating that these polymorphisms may be involved in the pathophysiology of volume-dependent hypertension., (Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Objective: Cardiotrophin-1 is a cytokine, a novel member of the interleukin-6 superfamily, which is isolated from mouse embryoid bodies. It is known to bind a gp130/ leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) receptor heterodimer and to induce myocyte hypertrophy. Accumulating evidence indicates that a gp130 signaling pathway is involved in cardiac development and ventricular hypertrophy., Methods: In order to elucidate the pathophysiologic significance of cardiotrophin-1 in ventricular hypertrophy associated with hypertension, we examined the level of cardiotrophin-1 mRNA in the ventricle of spontaneously hypertensive rats/Izm stroke-prone (SHRSP/Izm) in neonates, and at 4-, 12- and 20-weeks of age by Northern blot analysis. We also examined the gene expression of LIF by Northern blot and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analyses., Results: No significant difference was observed in the level of cardiotrophin-1 mRNA in the ventricle between SHRSP/ Izm and Wistar-Kyoto/Izm (WKY/Izm) neonates. However, the level of cardiotrophin-1 mRNA in the ventricle was significantly augmented in 4-week-old SHRSP/Izm, which did not yet show overt ventricular hypertrophy, and its augmented expression lasted for the duration of the experimental period. The difference in the level of cardiotrophin-1 mRNA between the two strains was most prominent at the age of 4 weeks. This augmented expression of the cardiotrophin-1 gene was not related to the severity of left ventricular hypertrophy. The level of cardiotrophin-1 mRNA in other organs, including the kidney and lung, showed no significant change with aging and was not different between the two strains. After long-term treatment with lisinopril, levels of cardiotrophin-1 mRNA were not changed, although it morphologically prevented the development of left ventricular hypertrophy. LIF mRNA was not detected in any ventricles examined by Northern blot analysis., Conclusions: The present study demonstrates that the expression of cardiotrophin-1 mRNA is increased in the early stage of ventricular hypertrophy in SHRSP/Izm and it remains elevated after hypertrophy has been established. However, it is unlikely that cardiotrophin-1 plays a mechanistic role in the development and maintenance of left ventricular hypertrophy in SHRSP/Izm. The present study also suggests that cardiotrophin-1, but not LIF, is a possible candidate for natural ligand of a gp130 signaling pathway in the heart.

The observation that antiplatelet therapy may decrease the incidence of Epo-induced hypertension in dialysis patients remains a subject of particular interest. The aim of the present study was to test this hypothesis in patients at the predialysis stage. Predialysis patients with renal anemia were treated with EPO (6000 IU/week) for 6-12 months. Patients were divided into two groups, one of which received antiplatelet therapy and the other did not, and a comparison was made between them with respect to the incidence of EPO-induced hypertension. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for developing hypertension during the EPO therapy. Such predictors included age, gender, antecedent of hypertension, antiplatelet drugs and diabetes mellitus. Overall, 66 patients were enrolled in the study and 18 developed hypertension (27%). Out of the 35 patients not receiving antiplatelet therapy, 15 developed hypertension (43%). In contrast, out of the 31 patients receiving antiplatelet therapy, only 3 (10%) developed hypertension (p=0.003 by Chi square test). Multiple regression analysis showed that the best predictive variables for the development of hypertension were antecedent of hypertension (odds ratio: 0.064, p=0.0118), and use of antiplatelet drugs (odds ratio: 5.081, p=0.0295). The present data provide evidence that antiplatelet therapy may prevent EPO-induced hypertension in predialysis patients. However, the mechanism to explain such an effect still remains to be elucidated.

Presents a case of combined treatment for renal disease with hypertension. Concentration of serum creatinine; Decrease in urinary protein excretion; Requirement for a combination therapy for progressive renal disease.