Search

The present study was designed to evaluate the effect of combination therapy using the angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor lisinopril and the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist nifedipine GITS on the degree and homogeneity of 24-hour blood pressure reduction in essential hypertensive patients. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, 51 patients (mean age, 54.4 +/- 9.4 years) with essential hypertension and clinic diastolic blood pressure between 105 and 115 mm Hg were randomized to 4-week treatment with lisinopril (20 mg), nifedipine GITS (30 mg), or their combination according to a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Trough clinic blood pressure and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure were measured at the end of the run-in period and after 4 weeks of treatment. In addition to clinic and 24-hour average blood pressure reduction, the trough-to-peak ratio and the smoothness index, a new measure for the homogeneity of blood pressure reduction, were also calculated. Although both lisinopril and nifedipine GITS produced a significant reduction in clinic and 24-hour average blood pressure values, the reduction obtained with the combination was significantly (P < 0.001) greater. Moreover, the combination therapy increased (P < 0.01) the smoothness index as compared with each single drug for both systolic (lisinopril, 1.02; nifedipine GITS, 1.1; combination, 1.76) and diastolic (lisinopril, 0.98; nifedipine GITS, 0.87; combination, 1.54) blood pressure values, whereas trough-to-peak ratio values (expressed as median) for systolic (lisinopril, 0.41; nifedipine GITS, 0.52; combination, 0.55) and diastolic (lisinopril, 0.35; nifedipine GITS, 0.40; combination, 0.49) blood pressure values were not significantly increased by the combination therapy. Thus, antihypertensive treatment with the combination of lisinopril and nifedipine GITS is more effective and balanced over the 24 hours than the combination components administered alone, confirming that the smoothness index is superior to the trough-to-peak ratio in assessing homogeneity of pharmacologic blood pressure reduction.

The present study was designed to evaluate the renal haemodynamic pattern of never-treated microalbuminuric and normoalbuminuric patients with essential hypertension. A total of 19 never-treated essential hypertensive patients with microalbuminuria were selected and, as control subjects, 24 never-treated essential hypertensive patients without microalbuminuria (determined on three 24-h urine collections) were recruited. In the two groups, we compared blood pressure values, standing plasma noradrenaline, plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone, urinary aldosterone, lipid profile, serum glucose and uric acid, glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow. In comparison with normoalbuminuric patients, microalbuminuric patients showed significantly higher systolic blood pressure values (P < 0.05), higher renal vascular resistances (P < 0.05) and lower plasma renin activity values (P < 0.01). Urinary albumin excretion showed a significant positive correlation with systolic (r = 0.46, P < 0.005) and mean blood pressure (r = 0.38, P < 0.05), serum uric acid (r = 0.43, P < 0.005) and triglyceride values (r = 0.36, P < 0.005), and a significant negative correlation with plasma renin activity (r = -0.34, P < 0.05). The present data are consistent with the occurrence of renal vasoconstriction in microalbuminuric never-treated essential hypertensive patients.

Since hypertension is associated with nephrosclerosis and an increased progression toward end-stage renal failure, the therapeutic approach to the treatment of hypertension should aim to protect the kidney against damage or to halt the progression toward end-stage renal failure. It appears that compared with systolic and mean blood pressure, the level of diastolic blood pressure is particularly associated with renal damage. In the presence of kidney failure the choice of antihypertensive drug should be made according to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. From the pharmacokinetic point of view, drugs that are eliminated via the biliary route are preferable since no dosage adjustment is required, and those with a favorable trough to peak effect can achieve better blood pressure control by reducing blood pressure variability. Pharmacodynamic properties should include efficacy in lowering blood pressure, beneficial renal effects, and good tolerability. Hence, the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, which are effective during volume repletion and which counteract vasoconstrictor mechanisms, seem to be particularly effective. There is some suggestion, but no definitive proof, that blood pressure should be lowered well below 140/90 mm Hg; to achieve this, combination therapy frequently must be used. The rationale for combining two or more antihypertensive drugs is based on the knowledge that this combination can exert an additive antihypertensive action while reducing side effects. The combination of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor with a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist may well fulfill these criteria since this combination could enhance both antihypertensive and renal hemodynamic effects in comparison to single-drug treatment and could reduce the side effects of both drugs.

To evaluate whether, in the forearm of hypertensive patients with different circulating renin profiles, local beta-adrenergic receptor-induced production of active renin, plasma renin activity, angiotensin I (Ang I), and angiotensin II (Ang II) was or was not related to the renin profile, we studied four groups of patients: 1) hypertensive patients with primary aldosteronism and suppressed circulating plasma renin activity values (0.15 +/- 0.1 ng Ang I/mL per hour; n = 7), 2) essential hypertensive patients with low (0.47 +/- 0.1 ng Ang I/mL per hour; n = 8) circulating plasma renin activity values, 3) essential hypertensive patients with normal (2.48 +/- 0.52 ng Ang I/mL per hour; n = 8) circulating plasma renin activity value, and 4) renovascular hypertensive patients with high circulating plasma renin activity values (4.16 +/- 2.1 ng Ang I/mL per hour; n = 10). Isoproterenol was infused into the brachial artery, and active renin, plasma renin activity, and Ang I and Ang II forearm balance (venous-arterial differences corrected for forearm blood flow by strain-gauge plethysmography) were measured. Despite a comparable vasodilation, beta-adrenergic stimulation failed to release active renin, plasma renin activity, and Ang I and Ang II in primary aldosteronism. It slightly increased them (except for Ang I) in low renin patients but determined a local production in normal renin and renovascular hypertensive patients. The individual increments in plasma renin activity and Ang II release induced by isoproterenol showed a correlation with the renin profile.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Nifedipine interactions in hypertensive patients have been evaluated, taking into account both the possibility that the inhibition of prostaglandin (PG) synthesis induced by non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can reduce the antihypertensive effect of nifedipine and the interactions of nifedipine with other antihypertensive drugs. While the inhibition of systemic and renal PG synthesis induced by indomethacin reduces the hypertensive effect of many drugs, it does not change the antihypertensive effect of nifedipine. The combination of two antihypertensive drugs with different mechanisms of action is often needed in the treatment of hypertensives, since it is well known that monotherapy is able to normalize BP in no more than 50% of mild to moderate hypertensives, and the rationale to combine two antihypertensive agents is based on the knowledge that their combination exerts an additive antihypertensive effect when compared with single-drug treatment. While it is well established that nifedipine can be usefully combined with beta blockers, ACE inhibitors, and clonidine, it is still controversial whether the combination of nifedipine with a thiazide diuretic exerts an additional antihypertensive effect. We have previously shown that the acute hypotensive effect of nifedipine in patients with chronic renal failure is greater during sodium repletion than during sodium depletion, and that chlorthalidone, compared with placebo, does not increase the hypotensive effect of nifedipine in essential hypertensives.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

To investigate whether a K-rich/Na-poor salt is able to reduce blood pressure, 10 mildly hypertensive inpatients (six males) aged 28-53 years, with supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater than 95 mmHg after 5 days of hospitalization, on a standard diet containing about 20 mmol Na plus 4 g common salt (CS) were randomly given, in double-blind conditions, 2 g twice daily of either CS (five patients) or K-rich/Na-poor salt (five patients) to add to food for a further 8 days. Mean blood pressure was significantly (P less than 0.01) reduced to a similar extent in both groups in the first 4 days, and declined significantly (P less than 0.01) only in the K/Na group in the following 8 days, reaching values significantly (P less than 0.01) lower than those of the CS group. The heart rate did not change significantly while body weight decreased to a similar extent in both groups. Urinary sodium excretion was similarly and significantly (P less than 0.01) reduced in both groups in the first 4 days (CS 100.8 +/- 7.9 and K/Na 100.2 +/- 11.0 mmol/24 h, and remained unchanged in the CS group (109.9 +/- 4.3 mmol/24 h) but declined significantly (P less than 0.05) by about 50% in the K/Na group (62.9 +/- 3.6 mmol/24 h) in the following 8 days. Plasma renin activity (PRA) and plasma noradrenaline did not differ significantly between the two groups, nor among the days of treatment, but the mean blood pressure response to mental stress was reduced significantly (P less than 0.4) in the Na/K group compared with the CS group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

To evaluate the acute hemodynamic, both systemic and renal, and humoral effect of three increasing doses of Iloprost, a prostacyclin analogue, eight uncomplicated untreated hospitalized patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, while on a constant sodium and potassium intake, received, after oral hydration, three doses of Iloprost (1,2 or 4 ng/kg/body weight for 45 min) in a single-blind randomized sequence. Each dose was preceded by placebo (saline infusion for 45 min) with a 48 h interval between each study. Iloprost significantly (P less than .05) reduced blood pressure, and increased heart rate, filtered sodium, urinary sodium excretion, fractional sodium excretion, noradrenaline, adrenaline, and plasma renin activity (PRA). The blood pressure lowering effect as well as the heart rate, renal plasma flow and noradrenaline increases were significantly greater on the 4 ng dose. Glomerular filtration rate and adrenaline showed a dose-dependent increase; urinary sodium excretion and fractional sodium excretion were similarly increased by the three doses. No correlation was found between urinary sodium excretion and either glomerular filtration rate or renal plasma flow. The data obtained indicate that Iloprost causes reduction of blood pressure with a reflex activation in the sympathetic nervous system and stimulation of renin secretion, renal vasodilation mainly at the level of the afferent arteriole, and natriuresis. This latter effect is probably due to a direct inhibition of tubular reabsorption, which, at variance with the other effects, is dose-independent.