Search

Background: Inadequate blood pressure control and poor adherence to treatment remain among the major limitations in the management of hypertensive patients, particularly of those at high risk of cardiovascular events. Preliminary evidence suggests that home blood pressure telemonitoring (HBPT) might help increasing the chance of achieving blood pressure targets and improve patient's therapeutic adherence. However, all these potential advantages of HBPT have not yet been fully investigated., Methods/design: The purpose of this open label, parallel group, randomized, controlled study is to assess whether, in patients with high cardiovascular risk (treated or untreated essential arterial hypertension--both in the office and in ambulatory conditions over 24 h--and metabolic syndrome), long-term (48 weeks) blood pressure control is more effective when based on HBPT and on the feedback to patients by their doctor between visits, or when based exclusively on blood pressure determination during quarterly office visits (conventional management (CM)). A total of 252 patients will be enrolled and randomized to usual care (n = 84) or HBPT (n = 168). The primary study endpoint will be the rate of subjects achieving normal daytime ambulatory blood pressure targets (< 135/85 mmHg) 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization. In addition, the study will assess the psychological determinants of adherence and persistence to drug therapy, through specific psychological tests administered during the course of the study. Other secondary study endpoints will be related to the impact of HBPT on additional clinical and economic outcomes (number of additional medical visits, direct costs of patient management, number of antihypertensive drugs prescribed, level of cardiovascular risk, degree of target organ damage and rate of cardiovascular events, regression of the metabolic syndrome)., Discussion: The TELEBPMET Study will show whether HBPT is effective in improving blood pressure control and related medical and economic outcomes in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome. It will also provide a comprehensive understanding of the psychological determinants of medication adherence and blood pressure control of these patients., Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov: NCT01541566.

Introduction: The modulation of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) is an important pathway in managing high blood pressure, and its overexpression plays a key role in target end-organ damage. Telmisartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) with unique pharmacologic properties, including the longest half-life among all ARBs; this leads to a significant and 24-h sustained reduction of blood pressure. Telmisartan has well-known antihypertensive properties, but there is also strong clinical evidence that it reduces left ventricular hypertrophy, arterial stiffness and the recurrence of atrial fibrillation, and confers renoprotection., Areas Covered: This paper reviews telmisartan's pharmacological properties in terms of efficacy for hypertension control and, importantly, focuses on its new therapeutic indications and their clinical implications., Expert Opinion: ONTARGET (ongoing telmisartan alone and in combination with ramipril global endpoint trial) demonstrated, that telmisartan confers cardiovascular protective effects similar to those of ramipril, but with a better tolerability. Moreover, recent investigations focused on the capability of telmisartan to modulate the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-γ), an established target in the treatment of insulin resistance, diabetes and metabolic syndrome, whose activation is also correlated to anti-inflammatory and, finally, anti-atherosclerotic properties. Telmisartan shows peculiar features that go beyond blood pressure control. It presents promising and unique protective properties against target end-organ damage, potentially able to open a scenario of new therapeutic approaches to cardiovascular disease.

Background: Increasing the dose or adding a second antihypertensive agent are 2 possible therapeutic choices when blood pressure (BP) is poorly controlled with monotherapy., Objective: This study investigated the effectiveness and tolerability of barnidipine 10 or 20 mg added to losartan 50 mg versus losartan 100 mg alone in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension whose BP was uncontrolled by losartan 50-mg monotherapy., Methods: This was a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study. Eligible patients (aged 30-74 years) had uncontrolled hypertension, defined as office sitting diastolic BP (DBP) > or =90 mm Hg and/or systolic BP (SBP) > or =140 mm Hg, and mean daytime DBP > or =85 mm Hg and/or SBP > or =135 mm Hg. All were being treated with losartan 50 mg at enrollment. After a 1-week run-in period while taking losartan 50 mg, patients were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of treatment with open-label barnidipine 10 mg plus losartan 50 mg or losartan 100-mg monotherapy. At the end of this period, patients with uncontrolled BP had barnidipine doubled to 20 mg and continued for an additional 6 weeks, whereas patients not achieving control on treatment with losartan 100 mg were discontinued. Office BP was measured at each visit, whereas 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed at randomization and at the final visit (ie, after 12 weeks of treatment, or at 6 weeks for patients not controlled on losartan 100 mg). The intent-to-treat population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had valid ABPM recordings at baseline and the final visit. The primary end point was the change in daytime DBP between baseline and 12 weeks of treatment, compared between the combination treatment and monotherapy. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated during each study visit., Results: A total of 93 patients were enrolled (age range, 30-75 years; 60% [56/93] men). After the 1-week run-in period, 68 patients were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of treatment with open-label barnidipine 10 mg plus losartan 50 mg (n = 34) or losartan 100-mg monotherapy (n = 34). A total of 53 patients were evaluable (barnidipine plus losartan, n = 28; losartan, n = 25). After 6 weeks of treatment, 18 patients in the combination treatment group (64.3%) had their dose of barnidipine doubled from 10 to 20 mg because BP was not normalized by treatment, whereas 8 patients in the losartan group (32.0%) were discontinued for the same reason. The between-treatment difference (losartan alone - combination treatment) for changes from baseline in daytime DBP was -1.7 mm Hg (95% CI, -5.8 to 2.4 mm Hg; P = NS). A similar result was observed for daytime SBP (-3.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, -8.1 to 1.7 mm Hg; P = NS). Likewise, no significant differences were found for nighttime values (mean [95% CI] DBP, 0.5 mm Hg [-3.7 to 4.7 mm Hg]; SBP, 1.5 mm Hg [-4.1 to 7.1 mm Hg]) or 24-hour values (DBP, -0.9 mm Hg [-4.8 to 2.9 mm Hg]; SBP, -1.6 mm Hg [-5.9 to 2.7 mm Hg]). Combination treatment was associated with a significantly higher rate of SBP responder patients (ie, <140 mm Hg or a reduction of > or =20 mm Hg) compared with monotherapy (82.1% [23/28] vs 56.0% [14/25]; P = 0.044). Drug-related AEs were reported in 4 patients taking combination treatment (total of 7 AEs, including 2 cases of peripheral edema and 1 each of tachycardia, atrial flutter, tinnitus, confusion, and polyuria) and in 2 patients taking losartan alone (total of 2 AEs, both tachycardia)., Conclusions: This open-label, parallel-group study found that there was no significant difference in the BP-lowering effect of barnidipine 10 or 20 mg in combination with losartan 50 mg compared with losartan 100-mg monotherapy in these patients with essential hypertension previously uncontrolled by losartan 50-mg monotherapy. However, the percentage of responders for SBP was significantly higher with the combination. Both treatments were generally well tolerated. European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials (EudraCT) no. 2006-001469-41., (2010 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.)

The treatment of moderate or severe hypertension in most cases requires the contemporaneous use of multiple antihypertensive agents. The most available two-drug combinations have an agent that addresses renin secretion and another one that is statistically more effective in renin-independent hypertension. The practice of combining agents that counteract different mechanisms is the most likely explanation for the fact that most available two-drug combinations have an agent that addresses renin secretion (beta-blocker, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin II receptor blocker or direct renin inhibitor) and another one that is more effective in renin-independent hypertension (diuretic, dihydropyridine or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker). Based on these considerations, addition of hydrochlorothiazide to the combination of an antagonist of the renin-angiotensin system with a calcium channel blocker would constitute a logical approach. Inclusion of a diuretic in the triple combination is based on the evidence that these agents are effective and cheap, enhance the effect of other antihypertensive agents, and add a specific effect to individuals with salt-sensitivity of blood pressure. The benefit of triple combination therapy with amlodipine, valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide over its dual component therapies has been demonstrated, and the use of a single pill will simplify therapy resulting in better blood pressure control.

Hypertension is one of the major risk factors associated with cardiovascular diseases. A range of blood pressure-lowering agents is available including diuretics, alpha- and beta-blockers, aldosterone antagonists, calcium-channel blockers (CCB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) and direct renin inhibitors (DRI). Most patients require two or more medications to control their blood pressures within normal ranges. When high blood pressure cannot be controlled by low-dose monotherapy, physicians employ either high-dose monotherapy or combination therapy. High-dose ARB monotherapy is more effective for reducing proteinuria against low-dose ARB monotherapy or CCBs. Combination therapy is recommended for hypertension patients to facilitate prompt maintenance of blood pressure. Single-pill combination therapy simplifies treatment and optimizes long-term compliance. Thiazide diuretics such as hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), alone or in combination are still widely used as first-line hypertension treatment. Recent studies have shown that double (CCB+ARBs) or triple (CCB+ARBs+HCTZ) combination therapies have a greater lowering efficacy and are better tolerated. Moreover, the use of DRIs has been patented and proven effective in selected categories of hypertensive patients with or without concomitant target organ damage (TOD).

Angiotensin II is a vasoactive hormone of the renin-angiotensin system and plays an important role in the pathophysiology of several organ damages. Angiotensin II receptor blockers have been shown to be effective in treating both hypertension and connected organ damages. It is well known that although the angiotensin II receptor blockers have structural and pharmacokinetic differences, few pharmacological differences separate them. One of these is the degree of binding to the angiotensin II receptor type 1 compared with the angiotensin II receptor type 2; olmesartan medoxomil exhibits more than a 12,500-fold greater affinity for the angiotensin II receptor type 1 receptor than for the angiotensin II receptor type 2, making it theoretically the second most potent agent. However, olmesartan's excellent receptor interaction is based on the combination of several specific pharmacokinetic factors. Potential advantages of this drug include once-daily dosing, a very low incidence of significant adverse reactions and/or events and a well-tolerated side effect profile. Nowadays, we have a lot of information about the pharmacology, antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil, to further extend many clinical studies are still continuing to evaluate the potential benefits of high dosages and/or combination of this molecule.