Search

Aims: This study aims to compare the preventive effect of low- or moderate-statin with ezetimibe combination therapy and high-intensity statin monotherapy on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause death in a real-world setting., Methods and Results: Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service datasets, two cohorts comparing high-intensity statin monotherapy with low- or moderate-intensity statin and ezetimibe combination were constructed by 1:1 propensity score matching procedure. Primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and all-cause death. Secondary outcome was an individual event. The study population was followed from baseline until the date of events, or the last health check-ups, whichever came first. Compared to high-intensity statin monotherapy, moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination significantly reduced the risk of composite outcome [hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.92, P < 0.001] as well as individual MI (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.94, P = 0.005) and stroke (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.93, P = 0.005), but not all-cause death. Low-intensity statin with ezetimibe also significantly reduced the risk of the composite outcomes (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.97, P = 0.024) compared to high-intensity statin monotherapy, but the risk of individual outcome did not differ between two groups. Statin and ezetimibe combination demonstrated consistent effect across various subgroups., Conclusion: Among people without pre-existing CVD, moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination was superior to high-intensity statin monotherapy in preventing composite outcomes as well as each of MI and stroke. In contrast, low-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination reduced the risk of composite but not individual outcomes., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: J.E.J. reports research support from Kyung Hee University which is her institution. Y.-C.H. research funding from Celltrion Pharm Inc. However, the authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could influence the work reported in this article., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: Assessment of residual cardiovascular risk in statin-treated patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is pivotal for optimizing secondary preventive therapies. This study investigates if non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is associated with residual ASCVD risk in statin-treated ischaemic heart disease (IHD) patients with and without diabetes., Methods and Results: Using the Western Denmark Heart Registry, we identified statin-treated patients with IHD examined by coronary angiography (CAG) from 2011 to 2020. Non-HDL-C was assessed within 1 year after CAG. Outcomes were ASCVD (myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and cardiovascular death) and all-cause death. Cox regression analyses obtained hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for age, sex, smoking, and hypertension. A total of 42 057 patients were included: 8196 patients with diabetes and 33 861 without diabetes. During the median 4.6 years of follow-up, event rates per 1000 person-years of ASCVD were 28.8 (27.1-30.5) and 17.2 (16.5-17.8) among patients with and without diabetes. In patients with diabetes, the adjusted HRs of ASCVD as compared with non-HDL-C < 25th percentile were 1.0 (0.9-1.2), 1.3 (1.1-1.6), and 1.6 (1.2-2.1) for patients in the 25th-74th, 75th-94th, and ≥95th percentiles. In patients without diabetes, the corresponding adjusted HRs were 1.1 (0.9-1.1), 1.2 (1.1-1.4), and 1.7 (1.4-2.0). Results were consistent across sex, age, clinical presentation, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol strata., Conclusion: In statin-treated IHD patients with and without diabetes, non-HDL-C, especially above the 75th percentile, is associated with residual cardiovascular risk. These results have implications for secondary prevention, targeting patients who may benefit most from intensified preventive therapy., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M.K.H. has received a research grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant number NNF22OC0074083). M.B.M. has achieved lecture fees from Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Amarin, Sanofi, and Amgen. K.K.W.O. is supported by a grant from the Danish Cardiovascular Academy funded by the Danish Heart Association and Novo Nordisk. P.G.T.: none. RWT: the Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, receives funding for other studies in the form of institutional research grants to (and administered by) Aarhus University. None of these studies has any relation to the present study. M.M. is supported by a grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant number NNF22OC0074083), has received lecture and/or advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novo Nordisk, has received research grants from Philips, Bayer, and Novo Nordisk, has received a travel grant from Novo Nordisk, has ongoing institutional research contracts with Janssen, Novo Nordisk, and Philips, and is a minor shareholder in Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and Company, and Verve Therapeutics., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: Patients with cancer are at increased cardiovascular (CV) risk. We aimed to compare the recommended and observed statin use among individuals with and without cancer., Methods and Results: Using three 2-year cycles from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013-18), we analysed data from 17 050 US adults. We compared the prevalence of Class 1 statin recommendations and use between individuals with and without cancer, overall, and among different demographic groups. Individuals with a history of cancer were older and had a higher burden of comorbidities. Stratified by age groups, they were more likely to have a secondary prevention indication compared with individuals without cancer but not a primary prevention indication for statin. Among individuals with an indication for statin therapy, the prevalence of statin use was higher in the cancer group compared with those without cancer (60.8% vs. 47.8%, P < 0.001), regardless of sex, type of indication (primary vs. secondary prevention), and education level. However, the higher prevalence of statin use in the cancer group was noted among younger individuals, ethnic minorities, and those with lower family income., Conclusion: Our finding highlights the importance of optimization of CV health in patients with cancer, as individuals with cancer were more likely to have a Class 1 indication for statin treatment when compared with individuals without cancer. Important differences in statin use among cohorts based on sex, age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status were identified, which may provide a framework through which CV risk factor control can be targeted in this population., Key Findings: Higher statin use in cancer patients: Among those with Class 1 recommendation to take statins, 60.8% of cancer patients were using them, compared with 47.8% of non-cancer individuals, indicating a greater adherence to heart health recommendations in the cancer group. Demographic variations in statin use: The study found notable differences in statin use among younger individuals, ethnic minorities, and those with lower income within the cancer patient group, suggesting disparities in how these subgroups manage their cardiovascular health., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: none declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Effective management of dyslipidemias is crucial for reducing morbidity and mortality among patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Sex differences in dyslipidemia management after premature ACS in Israeli patients have not been extensively studied. This study aimed to investigate potential disparities between men and women in managing dyslipidemia, considering current guidelines. Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined patients who were 55 years old or younger and admitted to Meir Medical Center for ACS from January 2018 to February 2019. The study aimed to evaluate the use of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), measure the achievement of target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, and analyze the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in both male and female patients. Results: The study included a total of 687 participants, of which 23.3% were identified as females. Upon discharge, ∼80% of the patients were prescribed high-intensity statins. After 1 year, it was observed that females had higher levels of LDL-C and lower rates of achieving target LDL-C levels (<70 and 55 mg/dL) as compared with males (45% vs. 54.6% and 30% vs. 42.2%, respectively). The use of non-statin LLT at the 1-year mark was minimal in both groups. Finally, it was found that the occurrence of MACCE was similar between males and females. Conclusion: Sex disparities in dyslipidemia management after a premature ACS were apparent, with females having higher LDL-C levels and lower rates of target achievement. Intervention is necessary to address these disparities and encourage greater use of non-statin LLT.

Context: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapy is considerably important in preventing cardiovascular disease (CVD) among patients with diabetes. Studies comparing CVD, stroke, and mortality outcomes of low- or moderate-intensity statins with ezetimibe combination therapy and high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with diabetes remain lacking., Objective: This study compared the primary prevention effect of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and all-cause death between combination therapy of low- or moderate-intensity statins and ezetimibe and high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with diabetes using the Korean National Health Insurance claims database., Methods: Patients aged ≥20 years with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia were enrolled. The combination therapy of low- or moderate-intensity statin and ezetimibe was compared with high-intensity statin monotherapy after a propensity score-matched analysis. The incidence of composite outcomes consisting of MI, stroke, and all-cause death and each component were analyzed., Results: In moderate-intensity statin therapy with ezetimibe combination therapy, LDL-C (74 ± 37.9 mg/dL vs 80.8 ± 38.8 mg/dL, P < .001) and the incidence of composite outcomes were lower (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.98) than those in high-intensity statin monotherapy. Meanwhile, no significant difference was observed in the LDL-C levels and composite outcomes between low-intensity statins with ezetimibe combination therapy and high-intensity statin monotherapy., Conclusion: Adding ezetimibe to a moderate-intensity statin in patients with type 2 diabetes has a greater LDL-C-lowering effect and greater primary prevention of composite outcomes than that of high-intensity statin monotherapy., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Aims: Proper prescription and high adherence to intensive lipid lowering drugs (LLD) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are crucial and strongly recommended. The aim of this study is to investigate long-term treatment patterns and adherence to LLD following hospitalization for a CHD event., Methods: Patients admitted to two Norwegian hospitals with a CHD event from 2011 to 2014 (N = 1094) attended clinical examination and completed a questionnaire, median 16 months later. Clinical data were linked to pharmacy dispensing data from 2010 to 2020. The proportions using high-intensity statin therapy (atorvastatin 40/80 mg or rosuvastatin 20/40 mg) and non-statin LLD after the CHD event were assessed. Adherence was evaluated by proportion of days covered (PDC) and gaps in treatment., Results: Median age at hospitalization was 63 (IQR 12) years, 21 % were female. Altogether, 1054 patients (96 %) were discharged with a statin prescription, while treatment was dispensed in 85 % within the following 90 days. During median 8 (SD 2.5) years follow-up, the proportion using high-intensity statin therapy ranged 62-68 %, whereas the use of ezetimibe increased from 4 to 26 %. PDC <0.8 was found in 22 % of statin users and 26 % of ezetimibe users. The proportions with a treatment gap exceeding 180 days were 22 % for statins and 28 % for ezetimibe. Smoking at hospitalization and negative affectivity were significantly associated with reduced statin adherence, regardless of adherence measure., Conclusions: In this long-term follow-up of patients with CHD, less than 70 % used high-intensity statin therapy with only small changes over time, and only 25 % used additional treatment with ezetimibe. We identified factors associated with reduced statin adherence that may be target for interventions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:IE and CB are affiliated with Oslo Economics and have completed consultancy assignments outside the submitted work for several public and private institutions in recent years. HS is affiliated with Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus and has received consultancy fees from Novartis, Arla Foods AMBA, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Neumirna outside the submitted work. EH, ES and TD reports no conflicts of interest. SH has received lecture fees from Sanofi, Novartis, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. JM received lecture fees from Sanofi, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline was a paradigm shift in lipid management and identified the four statin-benefit groups. Many have studied the guideline's potential impact, but few have investigated its potential long-term impact on MACE. Furthermore, most studies also ignored the confounding effect from the earlier release of generic atorvastatin in Dec 2011., Methods: To evaluate the potential (long-term) impact of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline release in Nov 2013 in the U.S., we investigated the association of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline with the trend changes in 5-Year MACE survival and three other statin-related outcomes (statin use, optimal statin use, and statin adherence) while controlling for generic atorvastatin availability using interrupted time series analysis, called the Chow's test. Specifically, we conducted a retrospective study using U.S. nationwide de-identified claims and electronic health records from Optum Labs Database Warehouse (OLDW) to follow the trends of 5-Year MACE survival and statin-related outcomes among four statin-benefit groups that were identified in the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline. Then, Chow's test was used to discern trend changes between generic atorvastatin availability and guideline potential impact., Results: 197,021 patients were included (ASCVD: 19,060; High-LDL: 33,907; Diabetes: 138,159; High-ASCVD-Risk: 5,895). After the guideline release, the long-term trend (slope) of 5-Year MACE Survival for the Diabetes group improved significantly (P = 0.002). Optimal statin use for the ASCVD group also showed immediate improvement (intercept) and long-term positive changes (slope) after the release (P < 0.001). Statin uses did not have significant trend changes and statin adherence remained unchanged in all statin-benefit groups. Although no other statistically significant trend changes were found, overall positive trend change or no changes were observed after the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline release., Conclusions: The 2013 ACA/AHA Guideline release is associated with trend improvements in the long-term MACE Survival for Diabetes group and optimal statin use for ASCVD group. These significant associations might indicate a potential positive long-term impact of the 2013 ACA/AHA Guideline on better health outcomes for primary prevention groups and an immediate potential impact on statin prescribing behaviors in higher-at-risk groups. However, further investigation is required to confirm the causal effect of the 2013 ACA/AHA Guideline., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Statins are the main strategy to reduce dyslipidemia-related cardiovascular risk. Nevertheless, there is scarce evidence on the real-world statins use in primary care settings in low-middle-income countries., Objective: We conducted a cross-sectional retrospective study using anonymized data routinely collected by community health workers in Brazil aimed to evaluate statin use and associated factors in a primary prevention population with cardiovascular risk enhancers., Methods: Study population consisted of adults with hypertension, diabetes, and/or dyslipidemia. The primary and secondary outcomes were the proportion of individuals self-reporting statins use on any dose and high-dose statins/high-intensity lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), respectively., Results: Of the 2,133,900 adult individuals in the database, 415,766 (19.5%) were included in the study cohort. From this cohort, 89.1% had hypertension, 28.9% diabetes, and 5.5% dyslipidemia. The mean age was 61.5 (standard deviation 14.5) years, 63.4% were female, and 61.0% were of mixed-race. Only 2.6% and 0.1% of individuals self-reported the use of statins and high-dose statins/high-intensity LLT, respectively. Older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.88, 2.05, p < 0.001), living in the South region of Brazil (OR 4.39; 95% CI 3.97, 4.85, p < 0.001), heart failure (OR 2.60; 95% CI 2.33, 2.89, p < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.35, 1.64, p < 0.001), and anti-hypertensive medications use (OR 4.38; 95% CI 4.07, 4.71, p < 0.001) were independently associated with statin use., Conclusion: In a real-world evidence study analyzing data routinely collected in a digitized primary care setting, we observed a very low use of statins in a primary prevention population with cardiovascular risk enhancers in Brazil. Socio-demographic factors and co-morbidities were associated with higher statins use rates., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The latest evidence indicates that ATP-binding cassette superfamily G member 2 (ABCG2) is critical in regulating lipid metabolism and mediating statin or cholesterol efflux. This study investigates whether the function variant loss within ABCG2 (rs2231142) impacts lipid levels and statin efficiency., Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Central, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until November 18, 2023., Results: Fifteen studies (34,150 individuals) were included in the analysis. The A allele [Glu141Lys amino acid substitution was formed by a transversion from cytosine (C) to adenine (A)] of rs2231142 was linked to lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and higher levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and total cholesterol (TC). In addition, the A allele of rs2231142 substantially increased the lipid-lowering efficiency of rosuvastatin in Asian individuals with dyslipidemia. Subgroup analysis indicated that the impacts of rs2231142 on lipid levels and statin response were primarily in Asian individuals., Conclusions: The ABCG2 rs2231142 loss of function variant significantly impacts lipid levels and statin efficiency. Preventive use of rosuvastatin may prevent the onset of coronary artery disease (CAD) in Asian individuals with dyslipidemia., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

This study aimed to investigate the association between the intensity of statin therapy and the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes in individuals without prior diabetes who were being treated for dyslipidemia with statins for the primary prevention of CVD, using the National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening database. The database is a longitudinal cohort study of Korean men and women 40 years of age or older who underwent comprehensive biannual screening health examinations by Korean National Health Insurance Service from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2015. We included patients in the health screening checkup cohort who underwent health checkups in 2009 and 2010.The primary outcome was the occurrence of a first major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event, new-onset diabetes. A total of 20,322 participants without prior diabetes at baseline from 2009 to 2015 were followed up for a mean duration of 81.2 ± 6.6 months. The mean age of all participants at baseline was 59.2 ± 8.4 years and 43.0% of them were male. Their index low lipoprotein cholesterol level was 130.4 ± mg/dL, the mean duration of taking statins was 337.4 ± 52.3 days, and 93.9% of them had been taking moderate-intensity statins. At that time, a total of 641 diabetes cases occurred, 41 from using low-intensity statins, 588 from moderate-intensity statins, and 11 from high-intensity statins. The results indicated no significant differences in the incidence of death, CVD death, or CVD among those in the strong statin group compared with the reference groups. While statin treatment for the primary prevention of CVD in patients with dyslipidemia showed a subtle difference in the incidence of diabetes, there was no difference in the occurrence of CVD or CVD death according to statin intensity., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Indians have early onset atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and acquire the risk factors at a younger age, and hence we need to aggressively address the management of dyslipidemia in the young. Cholesterol levels early in life will influence the development of atherosclerosis. Young atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) patients (18-40 yrs) should receive lipid-lowering drugs to reduce LDL-C<55 mg. Due to the asymptomatic nature of dyslipidemia, early screening will enable the implementation of management strategies which will decrease future cardiovascular events. In this review, we will provide insights into identifying and managing dyslipidemia in the 18-40 years age group (young adults). It is suggested that early detection and more aggressive management of dyslipidemia in young adults with or without risk factors like diabetes, hypertension, tobacco and central obesity, might reduce the risk of CV events occurring later in life. Although lifestyle modification is the mainstay of treatment (dietary recommendations, exercise, tobacco cessation, weight reduction, etc.) but in certain young adults we suggest use of statins in low dose or non-statin drugs if they have associated risk factors, LDL-C >160 mg or a high coronary calcium score. Young adults who are carriers of FH gene should receive aggressive lifestyle modification and appropriate antilipidemic therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder that often predisposes to cardiovascular diseases (CVD). CVD is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in diabetes. The typical diabetic dyslipidaemia is characterized by low HDL cholesterol, high triglycerides with mildly increased or even normal LDL. This attenuated rise in LDL is due to the more atherogenic small dense LDL particles. Genetic factors, obesity, lack of physical activity, alcohol abuse, poorly controlled glucose levels are some of the common risk factors for dyslipidaemia. Non-pharmacological management of dyslipidaemia is important and includes modification in the diet, increase in physical activity and efforts to reduce weight. Statins remain the mainstay of pharmacotherapy for dyslipidaemia in diabetes. Due to the small dense LDL, even patients with diabetes who have normal LDL cholesterol, achieve reduction in cardiovascular risk with statin therapy. Those patients who do not achieve acceptable LDL reductions with statin alone can be treated with combination therapy of ezetimibe with statins. Many novel therapies have also emerged such as bempedoic acid and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. The targets for LDL cholesterol depend upon the patients underlying cardiovascular risk category. The use of pharmacotherapy for lowering triglycerides in patients with mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia and diabetes is still a matter of debate. Proper management of dyslipidaemia is critical component of treatment of diabetes mellitus., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest We declare that we have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Patients with CKD are at increased risk for cardiovascular events. Clinical studies suggest statins reduce all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with CKD. Lipid lowering therapy with statin with or without ezetemibe is recommended for most of the patients in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min and also in those who have an increased urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (≥3 mg/mmol) for at least 3 months. Evidence suggests that it should not be started for hemodialysis patients without evidence of ASCVD. Patients who were already taking statins or statin/ezetimibe combination at the time of dialysis should consider continuing these medications, especially if they have ASCVD. Fibrates should not be used in conjunction with statins in patients with CKD, and ezetimibe monotherapy is also not recommended. The role of PCSK9 inhibitors is evolving suggests that it is effective in lowering LDL cholesterol without affecting the renal outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Hypertriglyceridemia and decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) persist despite statin therapy, contributing to residual atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Asian subjects are metabolically more susceptible to hypertriglyceridemia than other ethnicities. Fenofibrate regulates hypertriglyceridemia, raises HDL-C levels, and is a recommended treatment for dyslipidemia. However, data on fenofibrate use across different Asian regions are limited. This narrative review summarizes the efficacy and safety data of fenofibrate in Asian subjects with dyslipidemia and related comorbidities (diabetes, metabolic syndrome, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic nephropathy). Long-term fenofibrate use resulted in fewer cardiovascular (CV) events and reduced the composite of heart failure hospitalizations or CV mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Fenofibrate plays a significant role in improving irisin resistance and microalbuminuria, inhibiting inflammatory responses, and reducing retinopathy incidence. Fenofibrate plus statin combination significantly reduced composite CV events risk in patients with metabolic syndrome and demonstrated decreased triglyceride and increased HDL-C levels with an acceptable safety profile in those with high CV or ASCVD risk. Nevertheless, care is necessary with fenofibrate use due to possible hepatic and renal toxicities in vulnerable individuals. Long-term trials and real-world studies are needed to confirm the clinical benefits of fenofibrate in the heterogeneous Asian population with dyslipidemia.

Dyslipidemias are the most important coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factor. Proper management of dyslipidemia is crucial to control the epidemic of premature CAD in India. Cardiological Society of India strived to develop consensus-based guidelines for better lipid management for CAD prevention and treatment. The executive summary provides a bird's eye-view of the 'CSI: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dyslipidemia Management' published in this issue of the Indian Heart Journal. The summary is focused on the busy clinician and encourages evidence-based management of patients and high-risk individuals. The summary has serialized various aspects of lipid management including epidemiology and categorization of CAD risk. The focus is on management of specific dyslipidemias relevant to India-raised low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoproteins, triglycerides and lipoprotein(a). Drug therapies for lipid lowering (statins, non-statin drugs and other pharmaceutical agents) and lifestyle management (dietary interventions, physical activity and yoga) are summarized. Management of dyslipidemias in oft-neglected patient phenotypes-the elderly, young and children, and patients with comorbidities-stroke, peripheral arterial disease, kidney failure, posttransplant, HIV (Human immunodeficiency virus), Covid-19 and familial hypercholesterolemia is also presented. This consensus statement is based on major international guidelines (mainly European) and expert opinion of lipid management leaders from India with focus on the dictum: earlier the better, lower the better, longer the better and together the better. These consensus guidelines cannot replace the individual clinician judgement who remains the sole arbiter in management of the patient., (Copyright © 2023 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Indians have a pattern of atherogenic dyslipidaemia characterised by not so high LDL-C but elevated small, dense LDL-C, elevated triglyceride levels and low HDL-C levels. In addition, different lipid-lowering drugs exhibit pharmacokinetic variability in Indians, which may have implications on the optimum doses required to achieve the desired LDL-C levels. Currently the management of dyslipidaemia in Indians are based on the landmark trials, which largely included western population. This review focusses on major clinical trials of lipid lowering drugs with special reference to the Indian population., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd.)

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects 12 % of adult population and is increasing globally and in India. Peripheral arterial disease when associated with atherosclerosis in two or more other arterial beds such as coronary artery disease (CAD), mesenteric/renal artery and cerebrovascular disease (CVD), is known as polyvascular disease. The Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry reported that 1 out of 6 patients had multi-vascular bed involvement. Progression of PAD to critical limb ischaemia (CLI) is seen in 1 % of affected patients per year, but patients who progress to CLI may have a 10- to 15-fold increased risk of cardiovascular death. The 2019 ECS/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias have suggested that for primary or secondary prevention in very high risk, patients should follow a therapeutic regimen that achieves >50 % LDL-C reduction from baseline and an LDL-C goal of <55 mg/dl. High Intensity Statin is mainstay of treatment but optimal management is inadequate. Statin treatment reduces all-cause mortality by 39 %, CV death by 41 %, CV outcomes by 34 %, ischaemic stroke by 28 %, acute limb ischaemia by 30 % and amputations by 35 %. Ezetimibe when added to statins in IMPROVE-IT trial, showed significant reduction of MACE. PCSK9 inhibitor (FOURIER TRIAL) showed reduction in primary end point in PAD vs Non PAD patients (3.5 % vs 1.6 %). There is a critical need for an Indian multi-disciplinary task force for research on the direct impact of lipid-lowering agents on limb salvage rates and major limb-related events in PAD patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Lowering of cholesterol containing atherogenic particles through lipid lowering therapies is of outmost important in both in the elderly age group and younger age group in reducing the cardiovascular risk. This chapter summarizes the current existing knowledge regarding the factors which affects the key decision-making process in patients with older age, and also in special circumstance where the direct evidence of benefit for cholesterol lowering is lacking. Effort has been made to briefly summarize the recommendations to the patient and his/her family based on risk stratification of atherosclerotic versus non-atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, comorbidity burden, quality of life, survival prognosis, lifestyle/socioeconomic status and presence of frailty. Here in this chapter, we have collated and presented the available robust clinical trial evidence which is very much necessary for the assessment of risk versus benefit for hypolipidemic drugs in the elderly age group. While plethora of pharmacological interventions has evolved including statins, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, PCSK9 inhibitors, Inclisiran etc., but it is essential to establish lipid-lowering therapy goals based on the stroke subtype and the presence of comorbidities. Here in this section we have reviewed the collated clinical evidences for optimal drug regimen recommendation for elderly stroke patients for both primary and secondary prevention., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Diabetes, especially type 2, is considered a risk situation for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Subjects with diabetes type 2 have a mortality rate due to ASCVD 3 times higher than that found in the general population, attributed to hyperglycemia and the frequent association of other cardiovascular risk factors, such as atherogenic dyslipidemia. Numerous scientific societies have established a risk classification for ASCVD in diabetes based on 3 degrees (moderate, high and very high). The objectives of dyslipidemia control are clearly defined and accepted, and vary depending on the previously established cardiovascular risk. In moderate or intermediate risk, the guidelines propose a less intensive intervention, maintaining LDL-C levels<100mg/dL and NO-HDL-C levels<130mg/dL, and waiting 10 years until reaching the high-risk category to initiate more intensive treatment. However, during the decade of follow-up recommended in the guidelines, cholesterol deposition in the arterial wall increases, facilitating the development of an unstable and inflammatory atheromatous plaque, and the development of ASCVD. Alternatively, diabetes could be considered from the outset to be a high-risk situation and the goal should be LDL-C<70mg/dL. Furthermore, maintaining LDL-C levels<70mg/dL contributes to reducing and stabilizing atheromatous plaque, avoiding or reducing mortality episodes due to ASCVD during those years of diabetes evolution. Should we maintain the proposed objectives in subjects with diabetes and moderate risk for a decade until reaching the high cardiovascular risk phase or, on the contrary, should we adopt a more intensive stance from the beginning seeking to reduce cardiovascular risk in the majority of patients with diabetes? Is it better to wait or prevent with effective therapeutic measures from the first moment?, (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the contemporary trends of lipid concentrations, cholesterol evaluation, hypercholesterolemia awareness, and statin use among individuals with severe dyslipidemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] level ≥190 mg/dL) between 2011 and 2020., Patients and Methods: This serial cross-sectional analysis included nonpregnant adults ≥20 years of age from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2011 and 2020. Age-adjusted weighted trends of LDL-C, triglycerides, cholesterol evaluation in the past 5 years, hypercholesterolemia awareness, and documented statin use among individuals with severe dyslipidemia were estimated., Results: Among 24,722 participants included, the prevalence of severe dyslipidemia was 5.4% (SE: 0.2%) which was stable across the study period (P trend =.78). Among individuals with severe dyslipidemia (mean age: 55.3 [SE: 0.7] years; 52.2% females; 68.8% non-Hispanic White), LDL-C (224.3 [SE: 4.2] mg/dL in 2011-2012 to 224.2 [SE: 4.6] mg/dL in 2017-2020; P trend  =.83), and triglyceride (123.3 [SE: 1.1] mg/dL in 2011-2012 to 101.8 [SE: 1.1] mg/dL in 2017-2020; P trend =.13), levels remained stable from 2011 to 2020. The rates of cholesterol evaluation in the past 5 years (72.0% [SE: 5.7%] in 2011-2012 to 78.0% [SE: 4.8%] in 2017-2020; P trend =.91), hypercholesterolemia awareness (48.1% [SE: 5.5%] in 2011-2012 to 51.9% [SE: 5.8%] in 2017- 2020; P trend =.77), and documented statin use (34.7% [SE: 4.5%] in 2011-2012 to 33.4% [SE: 4.0%] in 2017-2020; P trend =.28) remained stagnant in individuals with severe dyslipidemia between 2011 and 2020., Conclusion: Among individuals with severe dyslipidemia, cholesterol evaluation and hypercholesterolemia awareness rates were stable at ∼75% and ∼50% in the past decade. Only ∼34% of individuals with severe dyslipidemia took statins between 2011 and 2020, which likely contributed to the stable LDL-C levels noted across the study period. Further investigations into the determinants of statin use and adherence to statins are needed., (Copyright © 2023 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Dyslipidemia is treated effectively with statins, but treatment has the potential to induce new-onset type-2 diabetes. Gut microbiota may contribute to this outcome variability. We assessed the associations of gut microbiota diversity and composition with statins. Bacterial associations with statin-associated new-onset type-2 diabetes (T2D) risk were also prospectively evaluated., Methods: We examined shallow-shotgun-sequenced fecal samples from 5755 individuals in the FINRISK-2002 population cohort with a 17+-year-long register-based follow-up. Alpha-diversity was quantified using Shannon index and beta-diversity with Aitchison distance. Species-specific differential abundances were analyzed using general multivariate regression. Prospective associations were assessed with Cox regression. Applicable results were validated using gradient boosting., Results: Statin use associated with differing taxonomic composition (R 2 , 0.02%; q=0.02) and 13 differentially abundant species in fully adjusted models (MaAsLin; q<0.05). The strongest positive association was with Clostridium sartagoforme (β=0.37; SE=0.13; q=0.02) and the strongest negative association with Bacteroides cellulosilyticus (β=-0.31; SE=0.11; q=0.02). Twenty-five microbial features had significant associations with incident T2D in statin users, of which only Bacteroides vulgatus (HR, 1.286 [1.136-1.457]; q=0.03) was consistent regardless of model adjustment. Finally, higher statin-associated T2D risk was seen with [Ruminococcus] torques (ΔHR statins , +0.11; q=0.03), Blautia obeum (ΔHR statins , +0.06; q=0.01), Blautia sp . KLE 1732 (ΔHR statins , +0.05; q=0.01), and beta-diversity principal component 1 (ΔHR statin , +0.07; q=0.03) but only when adjusting for demographic covariates., Conclusions: Statin users have compositionally differing microbiotas from nonusers. The human gut microbiota is associated with incident T2D risk in statin users and possibly has additive effects on statin-associated new-onset T2D risk., Competing Interests: Disclosures V. Salomaa has ongoing research collaboration with Bayer Ltd (Unrelated to the present study). T. Niiranen has received a speaker’s honorarium from Servier. M. Jain holds a position and equity in Sapient Bioanalytics, LLC for work unrelated to the current article. The other authors report no conflicts.

Aim: The PERI-DYS study aims to characterize two groups of patients with dyslipidaemia at very high CV risk: PCSK9i receivers and patients qualifying for but not receiving PCSK9i., Methods: This is an observational study by office-based and clinic-based physicians, mainly cardiologists and other internists in Germany, with data extracted from patient charts., Clinicaltrials: gov identifier NCT03110432., Results: A total of 1659 patients were enrolled across 70 sites. The majority of patients (91.0%) were reported as having mixed dyslipidaemia or non-familial or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. At enrolment, 794 (47.9%) of patients were PCSK9i receivers (of these 65.9% ongoing, and 34.1% newly treated within 30 days before their baseline visit). Among PCSK9i receivers, the majority had evolocumab 140 mg (n = 632, 38.1% of total). PCSK9i receivers compared to non-receivers were about 2 years younger and had a lower proportion of males. In terms of comorbidities, they had (statistically significantly) more often CAD, and less often PAD, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension and chronic renal disease. The calculated untreated median LDL-C was 187 mg/dl (IQR 127; 270) in ongoing PCSK9i receivers, 212 mg/dl (IQR 132; 277) in newly treated PCSK9i receivers, and 179 mg/dl (IQR 129; 257) in non-receivers. Physician-reported statin intolerance was much more common in the two PCSK9i receiver groups as compared to non-receivers (67.3% versus 15.3%). Consequently, patients in the PCSK9i groups received fewer concomitant statins. Mean total cholesterol (143 vs. 172 mg/dl) and LDL-C (69 vs. 99 mg/dl) were considerably lower in ongoing PCSK9i receivers compared to non-receivers., Conclusions: PCSK9i receivers are characterized by higher baseline LDL-C and a higher portion of statin intolerance compared to those qualified for but not-receiving PCSK9i treatment. On-treatment, LDL-C was lower in PCSK9i receivers. Ongoing follow-up will determine the prognostic importance of these findings., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Aim: This study aims to characterize sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, use of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control in a population with increased cardiovascular (CV) risk., Methods: A cross-sectional observational study that uses electronic health records of patients from one hospital and across 14 primary care health centers in the North of Portugal, spanning from 2000 to 2020 (index date). Patients presented at least (i) 1 year of clinical data before inclusion, (ii) one primary care appointment 3 years before the index date, and (iii) sufficient data for CV risk classification. Patients were divided into three cohorts: high CV risk; atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk equivalents without established ASCVD; evidence of ASCVD. CV risk and LDL-C control were defined by the 2019 and 2016 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) dyslipidemia guidelines., Results: A total of 51 609 patients were included, with 23 457 patients classified as high CV risk, 19 864 with ASCVD equivalents, and 8288 with evidence of ASCVD. LDL-C control with 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines was 32%, 10%, and 18% for each group, respectively. Considering the ESC/EAS 2019 guidelines control level was even lower: 7%, 3%, and 7% for the same cohorts, respectively. Patients without any LLT prescribed ranged from 37% in the high CV risk group to 15% in patients with evidence of ASCVD., Conclusion: We found that LDL-C control was very low in patients at higher risk of CV events. An alarming gap between guidelines on dyslipidemia management and clinical implementation persists, even in those at very high risk or with established ASCVD., (© 2023 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC.)

Introduction: Many studies have examined the positive association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and the risk of Parkinson's disease (PD). Dyslipidemia has been reported to be prevalent in patients with diabetes; thus, lipid levels and the drugs for dyslipidemia could influence the development of PD in patients with DM. This study aimed to examine the association between lipid levels and the risk of PD in individuals with DM and evaluate whether the association changes with the use of statins., Methods: This nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study included individuals with DM according to the International Classification of Diseases between 2009 and 2012. Among the 2,361,633 patients with DM followed up for up to 9 years, 17,046 were newly diagnosed with PD. Patients with DM were categorized into quartile groups of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride levels., Results: There was an inverse association between lipid levels and PD development in the unadjusted model; however, this relationship became less significant after adjusting the use of statins in triglyceride and total cholesterol. In the analysis stratified by statin use, total cholesterol level was associated with decreased PD risk in non-statin users with DM; however, there was no significant association between total cholesterol level and PD risk in statin users., Conclusion: We found an inverse relationship between lipid levels and PD risk in patients with DM, which was influenced by statin use. Future studies about optimal target lipid levels relevant to PD risk considering statin dose in DM patients are needed., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Hyo Jeong Lee declares no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript. Dr. Kyungdo Han declares no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript. Dr. Yong Wook Kim declares no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript. Dr. Seung Nam Yang, declares no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript. Dr. Seo Yeon Yoon declares no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript. She received fees from the Korean government. This study was funded by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2020R1C1C1006867). The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). In addition, CKD itself is a coronary artery disease equivalent due to its atherogenic potential. Despite the role of CKD in ASCVD and recommendations to control lipid levels aggressively, landmark lipid studies have often excluded patients with advanced CKD. Furthermore, there is a scarcity of data on the use and efficacy of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in those with CKD in South Africa (SA)., Objectives: To determine the prevalence and control of dyslipidaemia in a cohort of SA patients with CKD., Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional observational study of 250 patients with CKD attending the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital renal clinic from 1 July 2019 to 31 July 2020 was carried out. Lipograms, the use of LLT and achievement of target lipid levels were examined., Results: The median (interquartile range) age of this cohort was 58 (46 - 69) years; 50.4% were males and 64.4% black African. Dyslipidaemia was prevalent in 83.6% (n=209) of patients. A total of 169 (67.6%) patients were on LLT, and of these only 28 (16.6%) achieved the recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target. Of those not on LLT, 51 (63%) were eligible for LLT and almost all were classified as either very high risk (64.2%) or high risk (28.4%) for ASCVD. Of those on LLT, all were on statin therapy, of which simvastatin at a mean dose of 20 mg daily was the most commonly prescribed LLT., Conclusion: This cohort comprised a large proportion of patients classified as high or very high risk for ASCVD. Despite this, the use of LLT was inadequate, and <20% of patients were at target LDL-C levels. These data suggest a greater need for awareness of initiating LLT to achieve recommended target LDL-C levels in patients with CKD.

Background: Primary dyslipidaemias, including familial hypercholesterolaemia, are underdiagnosed genetic disorders that substantially increase risk for premature coronary artery disease in adults. Early identification of primary dyslipidaemias via lipid clinic referral optimises patient management and enables cascade screening of relatives. Improving the identification of primary dyslipidaemias, and understanding disparities in ascertainment and management, is an NHS priority. We aimed to assess determinants of lipid clinic referral or attendance (LCR) in ethnically diverse adults., Methods: We did a retrospective cross-sectional study using the Lambeth DataNet containing anonymised data from 41 general practitioner (GP) practices in south London. We looked at referral data for adult patients aged 18 years and older from Jan 1, 1995, until May 14, 2018. LCR was the main outcome. We used sequential multilevel logistic regression models adjusted for practice effects to estimate the odds of LCR assessed across six ethnic groups (reference group White) and patient-level factors (demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, comorbidities, total cholesterol [TC] >7·5mmol/L, statin prescription, and practice factors). The study was approved by NHS South East London Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and NHS Lambeth CCG., Findings: 780 (0·23%) of 332 357 adult patients were coded as referred (n=538) or seen (n=252) in a lipid clinic. 164 487 (46·49%) were women (appendix). The fully adjusted model for odds of LCR showed the following significant associations for age (odds ratio [OR] 0·96, 95% CI 0·96-0·97, p<0·001); Black, African, Caribbean, or Black-British ethnicity (0·67, 0·53-0·84, p=0·001); ex-smoker status (1·29, 1·05-1·57, p=0·014); TC higher than 7·5 mmol/L (12·18, 9·60-15·45, p<0·001); statin prescription (14·01, 10·85-18·10, p<0·001); diabetes (0·72, 0·58-0·91, p=0·005); high-frequency GP attendance at seven or more GP consultations in the past year (1·49, 1·21-1·84, p<0·001); high GP-density (0·5-0·99 full-time equivalent GPs per 1000 patients; 2·70, 1·23-5·92, p=0·013). Sensitivity analyses for LCR restricted to familial hypercholesterolaemia-coded patients (n=581) found associations with TC higher than 7·5 mmol/L (4·26, 1·89-9·62, p<0·001), statin prescription (16·96, 2·19-131·36, p=0·007), and high GP-density (5·73, 1·27-25·93, p=0·023), with no significant associations with ethnicity. The relative contribution of GP practices to LCR was 6·32% of the total variance. There were no significant interactions between ethnicity and deprivation, age, or obesity., Interpretation: While interpretation is limited by the accuracy and completeness of coded records, the study showed factors associated with a higher likelihood of LCR included individuals recorded as having TC higher than 7·5 mmol/L, statin prescription, ex-smoker status, high-frequency GP attendance, and registration at a GP practice with 0·5-0·99 GP density. Patients with increasing age; Black, African, Caribbean, or Black-British ethnicity patients; and patients with diabetes had lower odds of LCR. Finally, the difference in odds of LCR between Black and White patients highlights potential health inequalities., Funding: NHS Race & Health Observatory., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Dyslipidemia refers to unhealthy changes in blood lipid composition and is a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). Usually, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) is the primary goal for dyslipidemia management. However, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) has gained attention as an alternative, reliable goal. It encompasses all plasma lipoproteins like LDL, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL), TRL-remnants, and lipoprotein a [Lp(a)] except high-density lipoproteins (HDL). In addition to LDL-C, several other constituents of non-HDL-C have been reported to be atherogenic, aiding the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. They are acknowledged as contributors to residual ASCVD risk that exists in patients on statin therapy with controlled LDL-C levels. Therefore, non-HDL-C is now considered an independent risk factor or predictor for CVD. The popularity of non-HDL-C is attributed to its ease of estimation and non-dependency on fasting status. It is also better at predicting ASCVD risk in patients on statin therapy, and/or in those with obesity, diabetes, and metabolic disorders. In addition, large follow-up studies have reported that individuals with higher baseline non-HDL-C at a younger age (<45 years) were more prone to adverse CVD events at an older age, suggesting a predictive ability of non-HDL-C over the long term. Consequently, non-HDL-C is recommended as a secondary goal for dyslipidemia management by most international guidelines. Intriguingly, geographical patterns in recent epidemiological studies showed remarkably high non-HDL-C attributable mortality in high-risk countries. This review highlights the independent role of non-HDL-C in ASCVD pathogenesis and prognosis. In addition, the need for a country-specific approach to dyslipidemia management at the community/population level is discussed. Overall, non-HDL-C can become a co-primary or primary goal in dyslipidemia management., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Dyslipidemia (DLP) is the most important risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and, in the context of severe hypertriglyceridemia (TG &gt; 10 mmol/l), a risk factor for the development of acute pancreatitis. The prevalence of DLP is very high, but their control, especially among the patients at highest risk, is often inadequate. When diagnosing DLP, we should always exclude its possible secondary aetiology (e.g. DLP in the context of hypothyroidism, diabetes, ...). Based on the assessment of the overall CV risk (according to SCORE2/SCORE2-OP or according to the comorbidities of the individual), target values for blood lipids, especially LDL-cholesterol, are determined according to the risk category. The basis of the management of DLP in the prevention of ASCVD is dietary and regimen measures, followed by adequate lipid-lowering therapy in indicated cases. As of April 2023, the portfolio of lipid-lowering medication has been expanded to include inclisiran (small interfering RNA against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9)), which is administered directly in cardiologists' and internists' outpatient clinics, ensuring 100% adherence. In severe hypertriglyceridaemia, fibrate monotherapy may be indicated in addition to dietary and regimen measures; if this treatment fails, some patients may be offered lomitapide, volanesorsen or evinacumab as part of clinical trials or specific treatment programmes if very strict indication criteria are met.

Introduction and Objective: The cardiovascular prevention strategy by autonomous communities can be variable since the competences in health are transferred. The objective of the study was to determine the degree of dyslipidaemia control and the lipid-lowering pharmacological therapy used in patients at high/very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) by autonomous communities., Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, descriptive study based on a consensus methodology. Information on the clinical practice of 145 health areas belonging to 17 Spanish autonomous communities was collected through face-to-face meetings and questionnaires administered to the 435 participating physicians. Furthermore, aggregate non-identifiable data were compiled from 10 consecutive dyslipidaemic patients that each participant had recently visited., Results: Of the 4010 patients collected, 649 (16%) had high and 2458 (61%) very high CVR. The distribution of the 3107 high/very high CVR patients was balanced across regions, but there were inter-regional differences (P<.0001) in the achievement of target LDL-C <70 and <55mg/dL, respectively. High-intensity statins in monotherapy or in combination with ezetimibe and/or PCSK9 inhibitors were used in 44, 21 and 4% of high CVR patients, while in those at very high CVR it rose to 38, 45 and 6%, respectively. The use of these lipid-lowering therapies at national level was significantly different between regions (P=.0079)., Conclusions: Even though the distribution of patients at high/very high CVR was similar between autonomous communities, inter-territorial differences were identified in the degree of achievement of LDL cholesterol therapeutic goal and use of lipid-lowering therapy., (Copyright © 2023 Sociedad Española de Arteriosclerosis. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

A growing number of patients with metabolic disorders are receiving statin and antidiabetic therapies as comedications. A signal of increased risk of myotoxicity due to potential interactions between antidiabetics and statins has been detected in previous studies. To investigate the effects of metformin on myopathy risks when added to preexisting statin therapy in dyslipidemia patients, we performed a retrospective cohort study using the Korean national health insurance data in statin-treated dyslipidemia patients with or without concomitant metformin use. We compared the risk of myopathy in statin + metformin users against statin-only users. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) have been calculated following propensity score (PS) matching between study groups and subsequent stratification per patient factors. We included 4092 and 8161 patients in PS-matched statin + metformin and statin-only groups, respectively. The risk of myopathy decreased when metformin was used together with statins (adjusted HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.71-0.99). In subgroup analyses per individual statin agent and in stratified risk analyses, no specific statin agents or patient factors were associated with statistically significant myopathy risk. This study found that a comedication with metformin was associated with decreased myopathy risk in statin-treated dyslipidemia patients compared to statin-only users. Our findings suggest that metformin may provide protective effects on potential muscle toxicities induced by statin therapy., (© 2023 The Authors. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Extremely variable prevalence rates of atherogenic dyslipidaemia (AD) in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) subjects have been reported. The primary aim was to assess AD prevalence in Spanish T2DM subjects. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the differential clinical characteristics between T2DM subjects with and without AD, to describe lipid profile evolution and use of lipid-lowering treatment in clinical practice by the Spanish Lipid Units. Data was obtained from the National Registry of Dyslipidaemias of the Spanish Atherosclerosis Society, from a multicentric sub-study focused on AD prevalence in T2DM subjects (PREDISAT study). The inclusion criteria were subjects diagnosed of T2DM with age ≥18 years old. A total of 385 T2DM subjects with a mean age of 61 years and 246 (64%) men were included. The mean follow-up was 22 ± 7.4 months. At baseline, 41.3% of the T2DM subjects presented AD, this percentage decreasing to 34.8% with therapeutic intervention. AD prevalence varied in different age groups and appeared to be more prevalent in younger T2DM subjects. Those with AD had a more atherogenic lipid profile at baseline, with higher total cholesterol, triglyceride and non-(high-density lipoprotein) HDL cholesterol levels at baseline, together with lower HDL cholesterol concentrations, without achieving lipid subfraction goals during follow-up. Although almost 90% of the AD subjects were under lipid-lowering treatment, most were receiving only one drug, being statins the most used treatmentA high AD prevalence in T2DM subjects was observed, being age a determinant factor, with a modest decline during follow-up. Although almost 90% of the AD subjects were under lipid-lowering drugs, most were only receiving monotherapy with statins., (© 2023 AOCS.)

Background: Lipid management with a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal of < 1.4 mmol/L is recommended for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and diabetes mellitus (DM) due to a high risk for adverse cardiovascular events. This study evaluated the lipid-lowering treatment (LLT) pattern and the LDL-C goal attainment rate in this special population., Methods: DM patients were screened from the observational Dyslipidemia International Study II-China study which assessed LDL-C goal attainment in Chinese ACS patients. The baseline characteristics between the LLT and no pre-LLT groups were compared. The proportions of patients obtaining LDL-C goal at admission and at 6-months, the difference from the goal, and the pattern of the LLT regimen were analyzed., Results: Totally 252 eligible patients were included, with 28.6% taking LLT at admission. Patients in the LLT group were older, had a lower percentage of myocardial infarction, and had decreased levels of LDL-C and total cholesterol compared to those in the no pre-LLT group at baseline. The overall LDL-C goal attainment rate was 7.5% at admission and increased to 30.2% at 6 months. The mean difference between the actual LDL-C value and LDL-C goal value dropped from 1.27 mmol/L at baseline to 0.80 mmol/L at 6 months. At 6 months, 91.4% of the patients received statin monotherapy, and only 6.9% received a combination of statin and ezetimibe. The atorvastatin-equivalent daily statin dosage was moderate during the study period., Conclusion: The low rate of lipid goal attainment observed was in line with the outcomes of other DYSIS-China studies., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background and Aims: We aimed to understand the impact of physicians' perception about LDL-cholesterol (LDLc) control on the management of patients with dyslipidemia in Spain., Methods: We performed a cross-sectional and multicenter study, in which 435 healthcare professionals participated in face-to-face meetings, collecting qualitative and quantitative information related to hypercholesterolemia management. Additionally, aggregated anonymized data of the last 10 patients with hypercholesterolemia attended by each physician were collected., Results: A total of 4,010 patients (8%, 13%, 16% and 61% with low, moderate, high, and very high cardiovascular [CV] risk) were included. Physicians' perception was that 62% of their patients attained LDLc goals (66%, 63%, 61% and 56%, for low, moderate, high and very high CV risk, respectively). However, when looking into the data only 31% (vs 62% p<0.01) of patients attained the LDLc goals (47%, 36%, 22% and 25%, respectively). Overall, 33% of patients were taking high intensity statins, 32% statin/ezetimibe, 21% low/moderate intensity statins and 4% PCSK9 inhibitors. These numbers were 38%, 45%, 8% and 6% for very high risk patients and 44%, 21%, 21% and 4% for high CV risk patients. In 32% of patients, a change in lipid lowering therapy was performed after the visit, mainly combining statins/ezetimibe (55%)., Conclusions: In Spain, most patients with dyslipidemia do not achieve the recommended LDLc goals because of an insufficient intensification of lipid lowering therapy. On the one hand, this is in part due to physicians misperception on preventive LDLc control and the need for repeated advice to patient, and, on the other, to the lack of patient adherence., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Juan Cosin-Sales: has received conference fees from Almirall, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, MSD, Novartis, Organon, Rovi and Sanofi; has participated in advisory services for Almirall, Amgen, MSD and Sanofi; and has received research grants from Amgen, Ferrer, MSD and Sanofi. Raquel Campuzano: has received conference fees from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Mylan, MSD, Organon, Sanofi, Servier and Novartis; has participated in advisory services for Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi and Servier; and has received collaborations to scientific or research projects from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Organon, Servier and Novartis. José Luis Díaz: has received fees for presentations, advisory services or scientific collaborations from Amgen, Bayer, Boëringher, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Mylan, Novartis, Novo-Nordisk, Pfizer, Rovi, Rubió, Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo and Servier. Carlos Escobar: has received fees for conferences/advisory services from: Almirall, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esteve, Ferrer, MSD, Novartis, Organon, Rovi, Sanofi, Servier and Viatris. María Rosa Fernández: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Ferrer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Organon and Rovi; has participated in advisory services for Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi and Amarin. Juan José Gómez-Doblas: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Organon and MSD; has participated in advisory services for Amgen, Sanofi and Amarin; and has received collaborations to scientific or research projects from Amgen, Sanofi, Ferrer and Daiichi-Sankyo. José María Mostaza: has participated in advisory services and/or conferences, or has carried out projects for Pfizer, Amarin, Ferrer, Sanofi, Amgen, Alter, Servier, Novartis and Daiichi-Sankyo. Juan Pedro-Botet: has received fees for conferences from Amarin, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esteve, MSD, Sanofi and Viatris; and has participated in advisory services for Amarin, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esteve, Ferrer, Sanofi and Viatris. Núria Plana: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo Mylan and Alexion. Pedro Valdivielso: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Ferrer, Amarin, Akcea, Sobi, MSD, Novartis and Daiichi-Sankyo; has participated in advisory services for Daiichi-Sankyo, Amgen, Sanofi, Akcea and Amarin; and has received research grants from Ferrer and Akcea., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The role of statin therapy in the development of kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) remains uncertain. We aimed to determine the relationships between statin initiation and kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 DM., Methods: Through a new-user design, we conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study using the China Renal Data System database (which includes inpatient and outpatient data from 19 urban academic centres across China). We included patients with type 2 DM who were aged 40 years or older and admitted to hospital between Jan. 1, 2000, and May 26, 2021, and excluded those with pre-existing chronic kidney disease and those who were already on statins or without follow-up at an affiliated outpatient clinic within 90 days after discharge. The primary exposure was initiation of a statin. The primary outcome was the development of diabetic kidney disease (DKD), defined as a composite of the occurrence of kidney dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and > 25% decline from baseline) and proteinuria (a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/g and > 50% increase from baseline), sustained for at least 90 days; secondary outcomes included development of kidney function decline (a sustained > 40% decline in eGFR). We used Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the relationships between statin initiation and kidney outcomes, as well as to conduct subgroup analyses according to patient characteristics, presence or absence of dyslipidemia, and pattern of dyslipidemia. For statin initiators, we explored the association between different levels of lipid control and outcomes. We conducted analyses using propensity overlap weighting to balance the participant characteristics., Results: Among 7272 statin initiators and 12 586 noninitiators in the weighted cohort, statin initiation was associated with lower risks of incident DKD (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.83) and kidney function decline (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.44-0.81). We obtained similar results to the primary analyses for participants with differing patterns of dyslipidemia, those prescribed different statins, and after stratification according to participant characteristics. Among statin initiators, those with intensive control of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (< 1.8 mmol/L) had a lower risk of incident DKD (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.81) than those with inadequate lipid control (LDL-C ≥ 3.4 mmol/L)., Interpretation: For patients with type 2 DM admitted to and followed up in academic centres, statin initiation was associated with a lower risk of kidney disease development, particularly in those with intensive control of LDL-C. These findings suggest that statin initiation may be an effective and reasonable approach for preventing kidney disease in patients with type 2 DM., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© 2023 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors.)

Background: In contrast to guidelines related to lipid therapy in other areas, 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommend conducting a lipid profile upon diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and treating all patients older than 50 years without defining a target for lipid levels. We evaluated multinational practice patterns for lipid management in patients with advanced CKD under nephrology care., Methods: We analyzed lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), LDL- cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, and nephrologist-specified LDL-C goal upper limits in adult patients with eGFR < 60 ml/min from nephrology clinics in Brazil, France, Germany, and the United States (2014-2019). Models were adjusted for CKD stage, country, cardiovascular risk indicators, sex, and age., Results: LLT treatment differed significantly by country, from 51% in Germany to 61% in the US and France (p = 0.002) for statin monotherapy. For ezetimibe with or without statins, the prevalence was 0.3% in Brazil to 9% in France (< 0.001). Compared with patients not taking lipid-lowering therapy, LDL-C was lower among treated patients (p < 0.0001) and differed significantly by country (p < 0.0001). At the patient level, the LDL-C levels and statin prescription did not vary significantly by CKD stage (p = 0.09 LDL-C and p = 0.24 statin use). Between 7-23% of untreated patients in each country had LDL-C ≥ 160 mg/dL. Only 7-17% of nephrologists believed that LDL-C should be < 70 mg/dL., Conclusion: There is substantial variation in practice patterns regarding LLT across countries but not across CKD stages. Treated patients appear to benefit from LDL-C lowering, yet a significant proportion of hyperlipidemia patients under nephrologist care are not receiving treatment., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Elevated serum total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are established risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, a leading cause of death in China, especially in aged population. We sought to assess the latest levels of serum lipids, prevalence of dyslipidemia and achievement of LDL-C lowering targets among Chinese aged population., Methods: The data was obtained from the annual health check and medical records in primary community health institutions of Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Southern China. A sample of approximately 135,000 participants provides comprehensive estimates of the status of cholesterol level and statins use in older adults in China. Clinical characteristics were compared by different age grades, genders and years. Independent risk factors associated with statin use were determined by stepwise logistic regression analysis., Results: The mean levels of TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, TG were 5.39, 1.45, 3.10, and 1.60 mmol/L, respectively, while the prevalence of high TC, high TG, high LDL-C, and low HDL-C were 21.99, 15.52, 13.26, and 11.92%, respectively. Although statin use showed an increasing trend in both participants > 75 years and ≤75 years of age, the achievement of treatment goals fluctuated between 40.94 and 48.47%, and even seemed to have a downward trend. Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis further indicated that age, medical insurance, ability of self-care, hypertension, stroke, CAD, and high LDL-C were shown to be associated with statins use ( P  < 0.05). Those aged ≤75 years old seemed to be less likely to use statin, and those without medical insurance or ability of self-care seemed to be less likely to use statin, too. Patients with hypertension, stroke, CAD and high LDL-C were more inclined to use statins., Conclusion: Chinese aged population currently experienced high serum lipid levels and prevalence of dyslipidemia. Although an increasing trend was shown in the proportion of high CVD risk and statin use, the achievement of treatment goals seemed to have a downward trend. Improvement of lipid management is necessary in order to reduce the burden of ASCVD in China., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Jiang, Huang, Deng, Liao, Fang, Zhan, Wu and Xue.)

Aims: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) frequently co-exists with osteoporosis and dyslipidemia. Statins have been commonly used in the treatment of dyslipidemia. Recent studies have indicated a therapeutic role of statins in decreasing the risk of osteoporosis and fractures, but conflicting results have been reported. This study investigated the association between statin use and hip fracture (HFx) risk among T2DM patients., Materials and Methods: A retrospective Taiwan population-based propensity-matched cohort study was performed using the Diabetes Mellitus Health Database from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients with newly diagnosed with T2DM between 2010 and 2014 were identified. Patients who previously used statins and had ever suffered HFx before the index date were excluded. HFx that occurred from 2010 to 2019 was collected to compute the cumulative rate of HFx. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for the HFx risk according to the use or non-use of statins. To evaluate the dose-effect relationship of statins, sensitivity analyses were conducted., Results: After propensity score matching for age and sex, 188,588 patients were identified as statin users and non-statin users. Statin use after T2DM diagnosis was associated with a decreased HFx risk with an adjusted HR (aHR) of 0.69 (P < 0.001). A dose-effect relationship was identified. The aHRs for developing HFx were 1.29, 0.67, and 0.36 for patients who used 28-174, 175-447, and >447 cumulative defined daily doses of statins, respectively (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Statin use in adults with T2DM showed a lower risk of HFx by demonstrating a dose-response relationship., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: To assess the importance of clinical and genetic factors in management of dyslipidaemia in the general population., Design: Repeated cross-sectional studies (2003-2006; 2009-2012 and 2014-2017) from a population-based cohort., Setting: Single centre in Lausanne, Switzerland., Participants: 617 (42.6% women, mean±SD: 61.6±8.5 years), 844 (48.5% women, 64.5±8.8 years) and 798 (50.3% women, 68.1±9.2) participants of the baseline, first and second follow-ups receiving any type of lipid-lowering drug. Participants were excluded if they had missing information regarding lipid levels, covariates or genetic data., Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: Management of dyslipidaemia was assessed according to European or Swiss guidelines. Genetic risk scores (GRSs) for lipid levels were computed based on the existing literature., Results: Prevalence of adequately controlled dyslipidaemia was 52%, 45% and 46% at baseline, first and second follow-ups, respectively. On multivariable analysis, when compared with intermediate or low-risk individuals, participants at very high cardiovascular risk had an OR for dyslipidaemia control of 0.11 (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.18), 0.12 (0.08 to 0.19) and 0.38 (0.25 to 0.59) at baseline, first and second follow-ups, respectively. Use of newer generation or higher potency statins was associated with better control: OR of 1.90 (1.18 to 3.05) and 3.62 (1.65 to 7.92) for second and third generations compared with first in the first follow-up, with the corresponding values in the second follow-up being 1.90 (1.08 to 3.36) and 2.18 (1.05 to 4.51). No differences in GRSs were found between controlled and inadequately controlled subjects. Similar findings were obtained using Swiss guidelines., Conclusion: Management of dyslipidaemia is suboptimal in Switzerland. The effectiveness of high potency statins is hampered by low posology. The use of GRSs in the management of dyslipidaemia is not recommended., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Background/hypothesis: Risk factor control of diabetes mellitus (DM) and especially dyslipidemia remains unsatisfactory in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We aimed to analyze the knowledge of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) treatment goals, subjective level of information, and information needs in very high-risk patients with ASCVD., Methods: ASCVD patients (n = 210; 75 ± 9 years; 71.4% male; 89.5% coronary disease) with DM (96.7% type 2) completed a questionnaire assessing knowledge of HbA1c and LDL-C treatment goals and subjective level of information and information needs on disease-related topics of DM and ASCVD. Serum LDL-C and HbA1c were measured., Results: HbA1c goal (<7.0% in 60.6%) was attained more frequently than LDL-C goal (<70 mg/dl in 39.9%; p < .01). Significantly more participants named the correct goal for HbA1c compared to LDL-C (52.9% vs. 2.4%; p < .01). Subjective levels of information were higher and information needs were lower for DM than for ASCVD (p < .01 for all topics). No associations of knowledge of treatment goals and level of information with the attainment of treatment goals for HbA1c and LDL-C were found. However, in multivariate regression, higher levels of education were associated with knowledge of treatment goals (HbA1c: odds ratio [OR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.72, p = .04; LDL-C: OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.07-5.03; p = .03)., Conclusion: In very high-risk patients with ASCVD, a deficit of knowledge of treatment goals to control dyslipidemia exists when compared to DM, patients felt significantly better informed for topics of DM than for ASCVD and display higher information needs for topics of ASCVD., (© 2022 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Aims: To evaluate the effect of the ESC/EAS 2019 dyslipidaemia guidelines on patient management of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), through a survey designed to compare post-ACS patient management in 2022 with that in 2018., Methods: Online questionnaires focused on lipid profile and medications were used to gather data from 2650 ACS patients in 6 European countries, treated between March-June 2022 (ACS EuroPath IV survey). These data were compared with data collected from 2650 patients who participated in the ACS EuroPath I survey (conducted in 2018)., Results: Lipid testing was performed in 90% of patients and was done sooner after admission in 2022 versus 2018 (mean 1.4 vs 1.7 days). Increased testing for non-HDL-C, lipoprotein(a), and ApoB was observed over time. At discharge, most patients (≥90%) were receiving lipid-lowering therapy. Prescribing patterns differed, with a higher proportion of patients receiving statin plus ezetimibe combination therapy in 2022 versus 2018 (34% vs 13%). LDL-C levels were lower in 2022 versus 2018 at admission and at 1st, 2nd and 3rd post-discharge follow-up points. More patients achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals in 2022 versus 2018 at the first follow-up (average 14 vs 16 weeks since discharge; <70 mg/dL [1.8 mmol/L]: 34% vs 20%; <55 mg/dL [1.4 mmol/L]: 18% vs 10%) and at subsequent follow-up points., Conclusion: LDL-C goal achievement has improved since the release of the 2019 guidelines, but lipid management in post-ACS patients remains suboptimal., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest UL has received honoraria, lecture fees or research grants from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis and Sanofi. ALC has received honoraria, lecture fees or research grants from: AstraZeneca, Aegerion, Amryt, Amarin, Daiichi Sankyo, Esperion, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, Medscape, Mylan, Merck, Menarini, Novartis, Peer Voice, Pfizer, Recordati, Regeneron, Sandoz, Sanofi and The Corpus. The work of ALC relevant to this publication is supported by Ministero della salute Ricerca corrente. RDC has received honoraria, lecture fees or research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Roche, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Milestone, Menarini, Guidotti, Lilly, Merck and Portola. AS has received honoraria, lecture fees or research grants from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Ferrer, Getinge, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and Zoll. AZ has received honoraria, consulting or lecture fees from Sanofi, Amgen and Novartis. FS has received research grants from and/or was speaker (with or without lecture fees) on a.o. (CME accredited) meetings sponsored by Amgen, Bayer, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi Aventis, Recordati, Servier, Mylan and AstraZeneca. JWJ/his department has received research grants from and/or was speaker (with or without lecture fees) on a.o. (CME accredited) meetings sponsored by Amarin, Amgen, Athera, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Dalcor, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Medtronic, Merck-Schering-Plough, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, the Netherlands Heart Foundation, CardioVascular Research the Netherlands (CVON), the Netherlands Heart Institute and the European Community Framework KP7 Programme., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Studies showing that the management of dyslipidemia is suboptimal are hampered by their cross-sectional design or short follow-up. Using recent data from a population-based cohort with a 10-year follow-up, we assessed the use of statins, including their intensity. We used data from the CoLaus|PsyColaus study, involving 4,655 participants at baseline (2003 to 2006) and 3,587 at 10-year follow-up (2014 to 2017). We assessed the cardiovascular risk of participants according to established guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and from the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and estimated 10-year cardiovascular risk using corresponding risk scores, Systemic Coronary Risk Evaluation risk prediction model and Pooled Cohort Equations. We first determined eligibility for statins and adherence to recommendations at 2 time periods. Additionally, we assessed the prevalence of statin users from 2014 to 2017 in persons without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease at baseline and who developed it during the follow-up (secondary prevention). A total of 219 participants developed a first atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease during follow-up. Statin use in eligible subjects was 25.9% and 24.0% from 2003 to 2006 and 35.9% and 26.3% from 2014 to 2017, according to ESC and American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines, respectively. Per ESC guidelines, only 28.2% of treated persons achieved low-density lipoproteins cholesterol target levels from 2014 to 2017 (15.8% from 2003 to 2006), and women less frequently attained goals. Only 18% of subjects used high-intensity statins from 2014 to 2017, with women less often receiving them (14% vs 22%). In secondary prevention, only 74% of eligible subjects were using statins. In conclusion, based on contemporaneous data, management of dyslipidemia is suboptimal, including in secondary prevention, especially in women who are less frequently treated and, if treated, less frequently receive high-intensity treatment., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recent experimental studies have examined the efficacy of statins in preventing cancer, but the findings of clinical studies are inconsistent, and studies on Japanese patients are limited. This study aimed to clarify the association between statins and cancer risk among Japanese patients. We conducted a large population-based retrospective cohort study using the Japanese health insurance claims database, including patients newly diagnosed with dyslipidemia between 2005 and 2015. Patients who were on newly prescribed statins during the study period were designated as statin users. They were matched 1:1 with randomly selected drug nonusers who were not prescribed drugs for dyslipidemia according to age, sex, and year of first diagnosis of dyslipidemia. There were 23,746 patients in each group. The mean duration of follow-up for statin users and drug nonusers was approximately 2 years. Using a Cox proportional hazards model, significant reduction in cancer risk was observed in statin users compared with that in drug nonusers [adjusted HR = 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-0.97; adjusted for patient background factors]. The results of subgroup analyses suggested that prescribed statins reduced the incidence of cancer of the digestive organs (adjusted HR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.99) as well as reduced cancer risk in patients with nonsmokers (adjusted HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.65-0.92). Our results suggest that statin use may reduce cancer risk in patients with dyslipidemia., Prevention Relevance: This study clarified the relationship between statin use and cancer risk in patients with dyslipidemia. Our study will contribute to medicine selection in patients with hypercholesterolemia level. See related Spotlight, p. 1., (©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.)

The pharmacy pharmacist's function as a family pharmacist is expected to improve adherence to medication in patients suffering from chronic diseases, including dyslipidemia. This is true even in infectious disease epidemics. In this study, using anonymously processed receipt data from 700 insurance pharmacies in our group, we evaluated medication adherence in patients taking statin drugs before, during the first and second years of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic in terms of medication persistence and medication possession, and compared the results between the family pharmacist group (FP group) and non-family pharmacist group (NoFP group). The odds ratios of good medication adherence (medication persistence and medication possession) rates for the FP group relative to the NoFP group were 1.446 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.210-1.727] in the pre-epidemic period, 1.428 (1.192-1.710) in the first year of the epidemic, and 1.270 (1.113-1.450) in the second year of the epidemic. The FP group was significantly higher in all time periods. Therefore, it is suggested that the family pharmacist function improves adherence to statins not only before but also during the COVID-19 epidemic.

Aim: To assess the current dyslipidemia management in the Arabian Gulf region by describing the demographics, study design, and preliminary results of out-patients who achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals at the time of the survey., Background: The Arabian Gulf population is at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease at younger ages. There is no up-to-date study regarding dyslipidemia management in this region, especially given the recent guideline-recommended LDL-C targets., Objective: Up-to-date comprehensive assessment of the current dyslipidemia management in the Arabian Gulf region, particularly in view of the recent evidence of the additive beneficial effects of ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin-9 (PCSK-9) inhibitors on LDL-C levels and cardiovascular outcomes., Methods: The Gulf Achievement of Cholesterol Targets in Out-Patients (GULF ACTION) is an ongoing national observational longitudinal registry of 3000 patients. In this study, adults ≥18 years on lipidlowering drugs for over three months from out-patients of five Gulf countries were enrolled between January 2020 and May 2022 with planned six-month and one-year follow-ups., Results: Of the 1015 patients enrolled, 71% were male, aged 57.9±12 years. In addition, 68% had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), 25% of these patients achieved the LDL-C target, and 26% of the cohort were treated using combined lipid-lowering drugs, including statins., Conclusion: The preliminary results of this cohort revealed that only one-fourth of ASCVD patients achieved LDL-C targets. Therefore, GULF ACTION shall improve our understanding of current dyslipidemia management and "guideline gaps" in the Arabian Gulf region., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Objective: To describe treatment patterns, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in the Netherlands in 2018 of patients with hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia at high or very high cardiovascular (CV) risk., Methods: From the PHARMO Database Network adult patients with a diagnosis or receiving lipid lowering therapy (LLT) between 2009 and 2018 were selected. Patients at high or very high CV risk according to 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines with recorded LDL-C levels who were treated with LLT or were characterized as statin intolerant in 2018 were included. LLT treatment patterns, LDL-C levels and HCRU (General Practitioner [GP] consultations and hospitalizations) were assessed., Results: The study population included 54,346 patients, of which 70% were at very high CV risk and 30% at high CV risk. The majority (93%) received statin monotherapy, mostly of moderate (73%) or high (15%) intensity. Only 3% received a combination of statin and ezetimibe. Statin intolerance, based on a treatment algorithm, was estimated at 3%. Average LDL-C decreased with LLT intensity. Overall, 74% reached LDL-C < 2.5 mmol/l and 34% <1.8 mmol/l with their current treatment, and 46% reached their LDL-C goal according to 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines. The highest rates of hospitalizations and GP consultations, including home visits, were recorded in patients with peripheral artery disease or polyvascular disease., Conclusion: The treatment of hypercholesterolaemia and mixed dyslipidaemia in patients at high or very high CV risk in the Netherlands was suboptimal in 2018. To further lower CV risk alternative treatment strategies using add-on therapies are needed.

Dyslipidemia in patients with diabetes is an important treatment target as a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although the primary treatment goal for dyslipidemia is to control low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), achieving this goal remains suboptimal according to recent studies. It is important to set the target goal for LDL-C control based on an accurate risk assessment for CVD. Here, we summarize the latest evidence on lipid management in patients with diabetes and present a consensus of the Korean Diabetes Association and Korean Society of Lipid and Atherosclerosis on the treatment goals of LDL-C according to the duration of diabetes, presence of CVD, target organ damage, or major cardiovascular risk factors. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and CVD, an LDL-C goal of <55 mg/dL and a reduction in LDL-C level by 50% or more from the baseline is recommended. For the primary prevention of CVD in patients with T2DM with a duration of diabetes ≥10 years, major cardiovascular risk factors, or target organ damage, an LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dL is recommended. In patients with T2DM with a duration of diabetes <10 years and no major cardiovascular risk factors, an LDL-C goal of <100 mg/dL is recommended.

Introduction: Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD) are among the most relevant causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in aged people. Statins are one of the leading pharmacological interventions against atherosclerosis and are widely used to reduce the risk of occurring coronary artery diseases and related outcomes in both primary and secondary prevention. The management of chronic diseases is improved considerably over time, leading to an increase in life expectancy despite heavier comorbidity-related burdens in the elderly., Aims: The paper focused on the role of statins in the management of atherosclerosis and related burdens in elderly patients., Results: Statins are essential in reducing the risk of CVD in secondary and primary prevention, particularly in high-risk individuals. Guidelines encourage using specific algorithms with age-specific cutoffs to assess individual cardiovascular risk irrespective of baseline age, as the expansion of life expectancy produces favorable effects of statin treatment in those over 70., Discussion: Besides the estimation of baseline CV risk, a specific age-related assessment is also necessary before prescribing statin treatment in aged people focusing on frailty, potential pharmacological interactions due to polypharmacotherapy, cognitive impairment, and background chronic comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus. Before starting statin therapy, an accurate choice of type and dose of statins is needed as potential adverse events are more prevalent with high-dose than low-to-moderatedose regimens and with lipophile than hydrophile statins (e.g., potential implication on intra-cerebral cholesterol metabolism)., Conclusion: Despite possible adverse events, elderly patients should receive statins, when appropriate, to avoid the first occurrence of recurrent cardiovascular events and related burdens., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a known risk factor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Per the 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology cholesterol guidelines, high-risk ASCVD patients with CKD and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels  ≥ $\ge $  70 mg/dL should take a high-intensity statin with ezetimibe and/or a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i)., Objective/methods: We examined the changes in use of lipid lowering therapies (LLT) over two years in 3304 patients with ASCVD and CKD in the Getting to an imprOved Understanding of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Dyslipidemia Management (GOULD) observational cohort study., Results: Of those with eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , 21.6% (171/791) had intensification of LLT while 10.4% (82/791) had de-escalation of LLT. Notably, 61.6% (487/791) had no change in LLT regimen over 2 years. Statin use was 83.2% (785/944) at baseline and 80.1% (634/791) at 2 years. Statin/ezetimibe use increased from 2.9% (27/944) to 4.9% (39/791). Statin discontinuation at 2 years was greater with lower eGFR levels across all cohorts., Conclusion: Despite the recommendations of multiscociety guidelines, statin use, while high, is not ubiquitous and rates of high-intensity statin and ezetimibe use remain low in patients with CKD. There remains a significant opportunity to optimize LLT and achieve atheroprotective cholesterol levels in the CKD population., (© 2022 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC.)

Objectives: To determine the prevalence and patterns of dyslipidemia and its associated risk factors among patients with type 2 diabetes attending the National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Genetics (NCDEG)., Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the NCDEG in Amman, Jordan. A total of 971 patients with type 2 diabetes were included during the period September- December 2021. The socio-demographic data were collected through face-to-face interview questionnaire and anthropometric and clinical data were abstracted from medical records. The last three readings of lipid profile and HbA1C were abstracted from the medical records., Results: The overall prevalence of dyslipidemia among type 2 diabetic patients was 95.4%. The most common type of dyslipidemia was combined dyslipidemia (37.1%), with high triglycerides and low HDL-c (19.0%) being the most frequent type. Factors associated with hypercholesterolemia were diabetes duration ≤ 10 years, poor compliance to a statin, and HbA1c level (7-8%) ( P -values: 0.008, 0.001, 0.021, respectively). Moreover, smoking and poor compliance with statin therapy were associated with high LDL-c level ( P -values: 0.046 and 0.001, respectively). The presence of hypertension, high waist circumference, HbA1c level >8%, and diabetes duration ≤ 10 years were all associated with high triglyceride level ( P -values: 0.008, 0.016, 0.011, and 0.018, respectively). Hypertension and HbA1c level >8% were associated with low HDL-c level ( P -values: 0.010 and 0.011, respectively)., Conclusion: The combination of high triglyceride and low HDL-c is the commonest lipid abnormality detected in patients with type 2 diabetes. An educational program that emphasizes the importance of adherence to a healthy lifestyle is strongly recommended. Further studies are needed to capture a wide range of factors that might influence dyslipidemia and glycemic control., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Hyassat, Al-Saeksaek, Naji, Mahasneh, Khader, Abujbara, El-Khateeb and Ajlouni.)

Background: The global burden of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is substantial. Reducing the major modifiable risk factors for noncommunicable disease, including dyslipidaemia, represents a public health priority. Aim is to evaluate the prevalent adequate use of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) attainment among patients with PAD of the lower extremities undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Patients and methods: We screened PAD patients treated at the University Hospital Zurich (January 2012-December 2018). We excluded patients <18 years, without classifiable severity of PAD, or with missing LDL-C or medication data. In this cross-sectional study, we studied the prevalent LLT use and LDL-C values in target according to the most recent European guidelines. Available clinical data included demographic information, lipid profile, type and dose of LLT, characteristics of the artery obstruction and angioplasty. Results: A total of 2,148 angioplasties were performed in 956 patients: 614 (64%) were men; the mean age was 70.6 (SD 11.4) years. A total of 608 (64%) had a non-critical PAD (Fontaine stage I-IIb), whereas the remaining had a critical limb ischemia or a diabetic foot syndrome. Their median LDL-C value was 2.00 (Q1-Q3: 1.50-2.60) mmol/L. In accordance to the 2016 and 2019 European Society of Cardiology guidelines, the LDL-C target of 1.8 and 1.4 mmol/L was not reached in 63% (n=599) and in 79% (n=760) of patients, respectively. Only 41% (n=390) of patients were on high-intensity statin therapy. Conclusions: The attainment of LDL-C targets, as recommended by current European guidelines, and the use of high-intensity LLT were unsatisfactory in the majority of PAD patients.