Search

Objectives: Osmotic-controlled release oral delivery system (OROS®) hydromorphone - an extended-release preparation - is recommended long-term therapy for chronic pain patients. Dose proportionality of OROS hydromorphone has been shown in healthy Caucasian volunteers; however, no studies have been conducted in Asian populations. To determine whether ethnic differences affect the drug's pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, we evaluated the dose proportionality of OROS hydromorphone in healthy Taiwanese adults., Methods: This 12-week, open-label, 4-way crossover, phase 1 study randomly assigned subjects to 1 of 4 treatment sequences - single oral dose OROS hydromorphone: 8 mg, 16 mg, 32 mg, or 64 mg - along with 50 mg naltrexone. Dose proportionality was assessed using a linear mixed-effects model to estimate the slope of the regression line and its 90% CI for Cmax, AUC0-48h, and AUClast. Descriptive statistics measured plasma hydromorphone concentrations, PK parameters, laboratory analytes, and vital signs., Results: 23 subjects completed the study; a single-dose of OROS hydromorphone increased plasma concentration steadily for 6 hours and sustained it at or near maximum levels for ~ 24 hours. After dose normalization to a 16 mg dose, all studied doses demonstrated dose proportionality for Cmax, AUClast, and AUC0-48h,as the slopes of the regression lines for Cmax, AUClast, and AUC0-48h were close to zero, and the 90% CIs within pre-specified limits. Adverse events were as expected for hydromorphone administered with concomitant naltrexone., Conclusions: Single doses of 8 mg, 16 mg, 32 mg, and 64 mg of OROS hydromorphone were found to be dose proportional for Cmax, AUClast, and AUC0-48h and were generally safe and well-tolerated in healthy Taiwanese adults.

Once-daily hydromorphone extended-release (OROS(®) hydromorphone ER) and oxycodone controlled-release (CR) are semisynthetic, ER opioid analgesics with established efficacy. An open-label, randomized, 24-week, parallel group, flexible-dose study demonstrated noninferiority of OROS hydromorphone ER vs. twice-daily oxycodone CR in patients with chronic noncancer pain. In total, 112 patients were enrolled in a 28-week, open-label extension study; 60 patients received OROS hydromorphone ER and 52 received oxycodone CR. The primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to Weeks 38 and 52 in Brief Pain Inventory item "pain right now." Global assessments of efficacy, dosing convenience, and tolerability were secondary endpoints. Mean change in "pain right now" from baseline to Week 38 was -3.0 (OROS hydromorphone ER) vs. -2.8 (oxycodone CR), and from baseline to Week 52 was -2.9 vs. -2.8; these changes were similar to the changes in the core phase (-2.1 vs. -2.1). Similar improvements were demonstrated for secondary assessments, including pain, pain interference, and quality of life. At Week 52, global assessment of efficacy was rated as "very good" or "good" by the majority of patients (OROS hydromorphone ER, 91.7%; oxycodone CR, 86.5%). More patients in the OROS hydromorphone ER group (35.0% vs. 21.2%) assessed mode of drug intake as "very convenient." The majority of patients receiving OROS hydromorphone ER (88.3%) and oxycodone CR (88.5%) rated tolerability as "good" or "very good" at Week 52; few patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event (1.6% vs. 0.4%, respectively). The effectiveness of OROS hydromorphone ER and oxycodone CR was maintained through 1 year., (© 2012 Janssen Global Services. Pain Practice © 2012 World Institute of Pain.)

This randomized, open-label, crossover study investigated the influence of food on the pharmacokinetics of extended-release hydromorphone in 30 healthy volunteers. Participants received extended-release hydromorphone 16 mg in the fasted state and immediately after a high-fat breakfast. In addition, the pharmacokinetics of a 16-mg dose of extended-release hydromorphone and a 16-mg daily dose (4 mg qid) of immediate-release hydromorphone in the fasted state were compared. Treatments were separated by washout periods of 7 to 14 days. Naltrexone was given throughout each treatment period to block the opioid effects of hydromorphone. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the ratios of geometric means for maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for extended-release hydromorphone in the fed and fasted states were within the bioequivalence criteria range of 80% to 125%. In the fasted state, the 90% CIs of the ratios of AUC geometric means for extended-release hydromorphone and immediate-release hydromorphone were also within the bioequivalence range. Both hydromorphone treatments were well tolerated. This study shows that the bioavailability of extended-release hydromorphone is not affected by food and that the bioavailability of extended-release hydromorphone under fasting conditions is comparable with that of the immediate-release formulation when administered at the same total daily dose.

The steady-state pharmacokinetics of an extended-release formulation of hydromorphone, OROS hydromorphone, was investigated in a randomized, open-label, crossover study in healthy volunteers. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 16 mg of OROS hydromorphone once daily and 4 mg of immediate-release hydromorphone four times daily for five consecutive days. The two treatments were separated by a washout period of 7-14 days. Naltrexone was given throughout both treatment periods to block the opioid effects of hydromorphone. Steady-state hydromorphone concentrations were statistically analyzed using Helmert contrasts to determine when steady state was reached. A total of 30 participants were enrolled, of whom 29 completed both treatment periods. The two treatments produced comparable steady-state plasma drug concentrations, but peak-to-trough fluctuations were smaller with OROS hydromorphone (61 percent vs 172 percent) in comparison with immediate release hydromorphone. Overall systemic exposure to hydromorphone was similar between the two formulations. The ratio of the geometric means between the two formulations for the area under the concentration-time curves at steady state was 105.2 percent with a 90% confidence interval (CI) of 99.8-110.8 (geometric mean: 102.7 percent; 90% CI: 97.6-108.2 after correcting for measured drug content), which was within the bioequivalence range (80-125 percent). The analysis of Helmert contrasts showed that steady state conditions were attained by day 4. Both treatments were well tolerated. This study shows that OROS hydromorphone maintains steady-state plasma drug concentrations within the same range as immediate-release hydromorphone at the same total daily dose, with less fluctuation.

This was a randomized, open-label, comparative, parallel group study designed to demonstrate the noninferiority of once-daily OROS(®) hydromorphone compared with twice-daily sustained-release (SR) oxycodone in subjects with chronic noncancer pain severe enough to require continuous opioid therapy. The core phase (24 weeks) consisted of titration and maintenance periods. This was followed by an optional extension phase (28 weeks), which collected data used to assess long-term safety and efficacy outcomes. Five hundred four subjects were randomized between the 2 treatment groups. The primary efficacy analysis showed that OROS hydromorphone was noninferior to SR oxycodone (P = 0.011) as measured by change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain severity subscore "pain right now." The treatment difference with respect to change in BPI pain severity subscore "pain right now" was 0.29 (95% confidence interval: -0.27 to 0.84). The equianalgesic doses were 16 mg OROS hydromorphone and 40 mg SR oxycodone (median values). Secondary outcomes included other BPI scale items, the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Indices, and quality of life measured by the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Both treatment groups showed improvements in the main secondary efficacy endpoints. No statistically significant differences were shown between the treatment groups, except for the scores for somnolence (MOS sleep subscale) and physical functioning (SF-36), which both had a statistically significant difference between treatments groups in favor of OROS hydromorphone. Both study medications had equivalent and acceptable safety profiles. The results of this open-label study showed that once-daily OROS hydromorphone is a safe and well-tolerated treatment for chronic pain and as efficacious as twice-daily SR oxycodone., (© 2010 Janssen-Cilag EMEA (Johnson & Johnson).)

This pooled analysis was designed to determine whether the analgesic response to treatment with OROS hydromorphone, as measured by the "pain on average" scale of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), was different in patients with neuropathic pain compared to those with nociceptive pain, after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics. Three open-label studies on patients with neuropathic and nociceptive malignant and nonmalignant chronic pain were analyzed. A mixed model for repeated measures linear regression analysis was used to compare the effect of OROS hydromorphone on patients with neuropathic and nociceptive pain, adjusting for potentially confounding factors. Data from patients with pure neuropathic pain and mixed pain were also compared. Safety and tolerability was assessed by recording the number of adverse events. The primary outcome was "pain on average" (BPI item 5) over time. Secondary outcomes were the effect of OROS hydromorphone on other BPI items including "pain relief" and "interference with sleep." Patients with neuropathic pain showed a similar response to treatment with OROS hydromorphone to those patients with nociceptive pain. There was no statistically significant difference between the pain groups (difference between groups -0.552 at visit 7; P = .060 for overall difference between groups). For some outcome variables, treatment was more effective for patients with neuropathic pain. The treatment was generally well tolerated. This pooled analysis shows that treatment with OROS hydromorphone had similar efficacy for neuropathic and nociceptive pain.

The prevalence of pain increases with age. However, pain is often inadequately managed in elderly people, which undermines quality of life. Pain has been associated with depression, sleep disturbances, impaired ambulation, and increased healthcare use and costs. Effective treatment of pain improves the overall quality of life. However, pain management is complicated by the presence of multiple co-morbidities in elderly people, which increases the likelihood of polypharmacy, and therefore increases the chance of potential drug-drug interactions. Polypharmacy is also associated with poor adherence to therapy. Age-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes reduce the therapeutic index of drugs. Therefore, elderly people are more likely to suffer from adverse events and increased sensitivity to the analgesic properties of opioids. OROS hydromorphone (Jurnista) is a once-daily, extended-release formulation that uses the OROS push-pull technology to provide controlled release of the semi-synthetic opioid hydromorphone. Compared with conventional immediate-release hydromorphone, OROS hydromorphone provides more consistent delivery of hydromorphone with lower peak concentrations and less variability in plasma concentrations over time. The bioavailability of hydromorphone from OROS hydromorphone is minimally affected by food or alcohol (ethanol). Hydromorphone is mainly metabolized in the liver and is excreted in the urine. Unlike morphine, hydromorphone does not have an active 6-glucuronide metabolite. This metabolite of morphine can accumulate in the presence of renal failure; therefore, the lack of an active 6-glucuronide metabolite makes hydromorphone a useful alternative to morphine in elderly patients with renal failure. However, hydromorphone is similar to morphine in that it is metabolized to hydromorphone-3-glucuronide, which may be neuroexcitatory. Because of its low plasma protein binding and low probability of interfering with the metabolism of other drugs, hydromorphone may be especially suitable for patients taking multiple medications. OROS hydromorphone is an effective analgesic that is well tolerated and provides more stable plasma concentrations than immediate-release forms of hydromorphone. Its once-daily administration offers an advantage over immediate-release forms and longer-acting formulations that require twice-daily administration. This means OROS hydromorphone will be more convenient for elderly patients and may improve adherence, resulting in improved pain relief and quality of life.

This was a randomized, open-label, comparative, parallel group study designed to demonstrate the noninferiority of once-daily OROS® hydromorphone compared with twice-daily sustained-release (SR) oxycodone in subjects with chronic noncancer pain severe enough to require continuous opioid therapy. The core phase (24 weeks) consisted of titration and maintenance periods. This was followed by an optional extension phase (28 weeks), which collected data used to assess long-term safety and efficacy outcomes. Five hundred four subjects were randomized between the 2 treatment groups. The primary efficacy analysis showed that OROS hydromorphone was noninferior to SR oxycodone ( P = 0.011) as measured by change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain severity subscore “pain right now.” The treatment difference with respect to change in BPI pain severity subscore “pain right now” was 0.29 (95% confidence interval: −0.27 to 0.84). The equianalgesic doses were 16 mg OROS hydromorphone and 40 mg SR oxycodone (median values). Secondary outcomes included other BPI scale items, the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Indices, and quality of life measured by the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Both treatment groups showed improvements in the main secondary efficacy endpoints. No statistically significant differences were shown between the treatment groups, except for the scores for somnolence (MOS sleep subscale) and physical functioning (SF-36), which both had a statistically significant difference between treatments groups in favor of OROS hydromorphone. Both study medications had equivalent and acceptable safety profiles. The results of this open-label study showed that once-daily OROS hydromorphone is a safe and well-tolerated treatment for chronic pain and as efficacious as twice-daily SR oxycodone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]