1. Evaluation of Multiple Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score Panels in Women of Latin American Heritage.
- Author
-
Huang, Xiaosong, Lott, Paul, Hu, Donglei, Zavala, Valentina, Jamal, Zoeb, Vidaurre, Tatiana, Casavilca-Zambrano, Sandro, Navarro Vásquez, Jeannie, Castañeda, Carlos, Valencia, Guillermo, Morante, Zaida, Calderón, Mónica, Abugattas, Julio, Fuentes, Hugo, Liendo-Picoaga, Ruddy, Cotrina, Jose, Neciosup, Silvia, Rioja Viera, Patricia, Salinas, Luis, Galvez-Nino, Marco, Huntsman, Scott, Sanchez, Sixto, Williams, Michelle, Gelaye, Bizu, Estrada-Florez, Ana, Polanco-Echeverry, Guadalupe, Echeverry, Magdalena, Velez, Alejandro, Carmona-Valencia, Jenny, Bohorquez-Lozano, Mabel, Torres, Javier, Cruz, Miguel, Ho, Weang-Kee, Teo, Soo, Tai, Mei, John, Esther, Haiman, Christopher, Conti, David, Chen, Fei, Torres-Mejía, Gabriela, Kushi, Lawrence, Neuhausen, Susan, Ziv, Elad, Carvajal-Carmona, Luis, and Fejerman, Laura
- Subjects
Humans ,Female ,Breast Neoplasms ,Genetic Predisposition to Disease ,Middle Aged ,Multifactorial Inheritance ,Latin America ,Adult ,Hispanic or Latino ,Risk Factors ,Polymorphism ,Single Nucleotide ,Risk Assessment ,Genetic Risk Score ,White - Abstract
BACKGROUND: A substantial portion of the genetic predisposition for breast cancer is explained by multiple common genetic variants of relatively small effect. A subset of these variants, which have been identified mostly in individuals of European (EUR) and Asian ancestries, have been combined to construct a polygenic risk score (PRS) to predict breast cancer risk, but the prediction accuracy of existing PRSs in Hispanic/Latinx individuals (H/L) remain relatively low. We assessed the performance of several existing PRS panels with and without addition of H/L-specific variants among self-reported H/L women. METHODS: PRS performance was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and the area under the ROC curve. RESULTS: Both EUR and Asian PRSs performed worse in H/L samples compared with original reports. The best EUR PRS performed better than the best Asian PRS in pooled H/L samples. EUR PRSs had decreased performance with increasing Indigenous American (IA) ancestry, while Asian PRSs had increased performance with increasing IA ancestry. The addition of two H/L SNPs increased performance for all PRSs, most notably in the samples with high IA ancestry, and did not impact the performance of PRSs in individuals with lower IA ancestry. CONCLUSIONS: A single PRS that incorporates risk variants relevant to the multiple ancestral components of individuals from Latin America, instead of a set of ancestry-specific panels, could be used in clinical practice. IMPACT: The results highlight the importance of population-specific discovery and suggest a straightforward approach to integrate ancestry-specific variants into PRSs for clinical application.
- Published
- 2025