1. Predictors for the efficacy of Endostar combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC
- Author
-
Xiaoliang Zhao, Jian You, Wei Wei, Zhenfa Zhang, Jianyu Xiao, Meng Wang, Liqun Gong, Xiyin Wei, Xiaohua Wen, Changli Wang, and Yanjun Su
- Subjects
Male ,Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A ,0301 basic medicine ,Oncology ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Lung Neoplasms ,Angiogenesis ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Perfusion scanning ,Vinblastine ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ,Internal medicine ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Genetics ,Humans ,Medicine ,Progenitor cell ,Endothelial Progenitor Cells ,Neoplasm Staging ,Chemotherapy ,Neovascularization, Pathologic ,business.industry ,Cell growth ,Vinorelbine ,General Medicine ,Prognosis ,Neoadjuvant Therapy ,Recombinant Proteins ,Endostatins ,Vascular endothelial growth factor ,Permeability surface ,Treatment Outcome ,030104 developmental biology ,chemistry ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,cardiovascular system ,Female ,Cisplatin ,Stage IIIa ,business - Abstract
Background Endostar (rh-endostatin) is a new recombinant human endostatin, which could inhibit cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and tumor growth. Objective To explore anti-angiogenesis short-term efficacy combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and identify the potential predictive factors. Methods We pathologically examined 26 patients diagnosed with stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC who received NP chemotherapy alone or combined with Endostar, respectively. Results Our results indicated that total clinical benefit rate (CBR) 87.5% and 64% (p= 0.76), respectively. The clinical benefit (CB) patients in the treatment group showed significant changes in endothelial progenitor cells (EPC), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), blood flow (BF), permeability surface (PMS), and microvascular density (MVD) before and after treatment. Compared with CB patients in the control group, changes in EPC and MVD (only) before and after treatment were significant. The variation of EPC, PMS, and MVD before and after treatment in the treatment group showed positive correlation with tumor regression rate (TRR) and the variation of MVD, whereas those of EPC and PMS demonstrated positive correlations with variation of MVD before and after treatment. Conclusion Our findings suggested that PMS and EPC may be used as a predictive factor for the short-term efficacy of the combined therapy in NSCLC.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF