Search

The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness and safety of endothelin-receptor antagonist (ERA) in the patients with hypertension. Searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were conducted to include all the randomized control trials (RCTs). Eighteen trials including 4898 patients were used in the meta-analysis, of which nine were classified as low risk of bias and the other nine as unclear risk of bias. There was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality between ERA and placebo groups [6 trials, fixed effects model, RR 1.53 (0.89-2.62); random effects model, RR 1.45 (0.84-2.52)]. ERA significantly reduced 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and sitting blood pressure in patients with hypertension [5 trials, 24-h SBP: WMD -7.65 (-8.95 to -6.36), 24-h DBP: WMD -5.92 (-7.50 to -4.33); 18 trials, SBP: WMD -6.12 (-7.87 to -4.36), DBP: WMD -3.81 (-4.82 to -2.80)]. However, ERA had more adverse events [within 24 h: 3 trials, RR 1.16 (0.82-1.65); after 24 h, 13 trials, RR 1.21 (1.08-1.36)] and severe adverse events than placebo controls [SAE: 9 trials, RR 1.34 (1.13-1.60)]. In addition, there is a potential need for further RCTs that focus on the use of ERA in patients with hypertension.

Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP) mainly affects children, but age is also thought to be an important prognostic factor. Kidney involvement is a major cause of mortality in HSP patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinicopathological correlations between adults and children.A total of 208 children and 75 adult patients with HSP nephritis (HSPN) were evaluated. All patients underwent a renal biopsy.Extra-renal symptoms (arthritis and abdominal pain) were more common in the pediatric patient group than in the adult group (P 0.05), but renal symptoms (edema and hypertension) were relatively rare (P 0.05). A significant positive correlation was noted between pathological type and clinical type (P 0.01). Pathological activity was positively related to renal failure, abdominal pain, microscopic hematuria, hypertension, and proteinuria (P 0.05). Pathological chronicity was positively associated with age, duration of follow-up since the onset of palpable purpura, renal failure, lower extremity edema, hypertension, and proteinuria (P 0.05).Various clinicopathological differences exist between children and adults with HSPN. Massive proteinuria, renal failure, and abdominal pain usually correlated with severe pathology. Renal biopsy should be performed in both pediatric and adult HSPN patients with repeated hematuria and/or consistent minimal proteinuria.

BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate the role of hyperuricemia in the development of histopathological changes in HSPN. METHODS Clinical and laboratory data pertaining to 139 adult HSPN patients with and without elevated serum uric acid levels were retrospectively evaluated. There was a 14.4% prevalence of hyperuricemia in patients with HSPN. RESULTS Patients with hyperuricemia had higher levels of cystatin C and urine β2-microglobulin and lower levels of HDL-C in comparison to that in patients with normal serum uric acid levels (p < 0.05). Patients with hyperuricemia had higher scores of interstitial inflammation, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, glomerulosclerosis as compared to those normouricemic patients (p < 0.05). Serum uric acid was found to be correlated independently with the presence of interstitial inflammation, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, and glomerulosclerosis by multivariate analysis (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS High serum uric acid may be independently correlated with the development of tubulointerstitial lesions as well as glomerulosclerosis in HSPN.

Long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) therapy results in functional and structural alteration of the peritoneal membrane, including epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Interleukin 6 (IL-6) is a local pleiotropic cytokine, hypothesized to play an important role in EMT. This study was designed to investigate the role of IL-6 in EMT and peritoneal membrane dysfunction in long-term PD patients by assessing the level of IL-6 in dialysate and exploring the relationship between IL-6, the related signaling pathway JAK2/STAT3, and EMT, using in vitro cellular and molecular techniques. Plasma and dialysate levels of IL-6 were significantly higher in PD ultrafiltration failure patients compared with patients without ultrafiltration failure and were negatively correlated with measures of PD adequacy. In vitro IL-6 treatment changed human peritoneal mesothelial cell phenotype from a typical cobblestone-like to a fibroblast-like appearance and increased cell viability. IL-6 treatment increased α-smooth muscle actin and vascular endothelial growth factor expression but decreased E-cadherin expression. IL-6 treatment activated the JAK/STAT signaling pathway. However, the JAK2/STAT3 inhibitor WP1066 prevented IL-6-induced activation of the JAK2/STAT3 pathway and EMT. We conclude that IL-6 promotes the EMT process, possibly by activating the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. IL-6 may serve as a novel therapeutic target for preventing EMT, and preservation of the peritoneal membrane may arise from these studies.

Objectives This study aims to evaluate the safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and its effect on residual renal function (RRF) during peritoneal dialysis (PD). Methods This is a prospective, randomized study comprising 60 PD patients. The patients were assigned either to the MMF group (MMF dosage: 1-1.5 g/day in two divided doses for 6 months, followed by a dose of 0.5-0.75 g/day for another 6 months) or to the control group. The patients close monitoring for 1 year. Variables related to residual renal function, including urine volume, measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and renal Kt/V, were measured at 4 time points. Results There were no significant changes in urinary protein excretion in either group (P > 0.05). The MMF group showed a significantly higher urine volume than the control group (955.38 ± 243.54 vs. 786.15 ± 279.62 mL/day, P = 0.024). The renal kt/V was also significantly higher in the MMF group (0.59 ± 0.11 in MMF vs. 0.50 ± 0.19 in control group, P = 0.032). There was significant difference in the renal measured GFR between the two groups at 6, 9 and 12 months (MMF vs. control at 6 months, 6.14 ± 0.66 vs. 5.58 ± 0.65 mL/min per 1.73 m2, P = 0.003; at 9-months, 5.68 ± 0.80 vs. 4.78 ± 0.75, P

Endothelin-receptor antagonists may be a novel therapeutic strategy for diabetic nephropathy, but their use remains controversial. This meta-analysis seeks to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of endothelin-receptor antagonists for patients with diabetic nephropathy.Literature reviews of the PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing endothelin-receptor antagonist treatment with placebo in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Quality assessment was performed by using the Cochrane Handbook's tools for assessing risk of bias; meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.3.Five RCTs (n=2034 patients) were included for analysis. Compared with placebo, endothelin-receptor antagonists showed significant benefits for lowering albuminuria (five trials, n=2034 patients; SMD 0.66 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 0.76), but there was no significant difference in the risk of death (two trials, n=1674 patients; RR 1.49 95% CI 0.81 to 2.76). In addition, risk of cardiovascular events and other serious adverse events were significantly higher in the endothelin-receptor antagonists group than the placebo group (four trials, n=1956 patients; RR 1.45 95% CI 1.07 to 1.97; five trials, n=2034 patients; RR 1.32 95% CI 1.10 to 1.58).Endothelin-receptor antagonists can reduce albuminuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy, although use resulted in more serious adverse events compared with placebo. There is a potential need for further RCTs, which has larger sample size and longer duration.

Background Neuroprotection is a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Edaravone is a neuroprotective agent that has been widely used in China, and several studies have suggested that it may be beneficial in acute ischaemic stroke. Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of edaravone for acute ischaemic stroke. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (November 2010) and the Chinese Stroke Trials Register (November 2010). In addition, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 4), MEDLINE (1950 to November 2010), EMBASE (1980 to November 2010), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (1979 to November 2010), Chinese Biomedical Database (1979 to November 2010), Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Database (November 2010) and Chinese Science and Technology Journals Database (1980 to November 2010). In an attempt to identify further published, unpublished and ongoing trials we searched reference lists and clinical trials and research registers, and contacted a pharmaceutical company, researchers and study authors. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials comparing edaravone with placebo or no intervention in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Data collection and analysis Two review authors selected trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality and independently extracted the data. Main results We included three trials, involving 496 participants, and defined four trials as waiting assessment. All three included trials were of edaravone plus another treatment compared with the other treatment alone. The dose of edaravone injections in the three trials was the same at 60 mg per day. The course of treatment in all three trials is 14 days. None of the included trials reported the pre-specified primary outcome of death or dependency defined using the modified Rankin scale during the follow-up period. The three trials evaluated the effect of edaravone at different times and using different methods. All three trials reported adverse events; there were no differences between the treatment group and the control group. Overall, edaravone appeared to increase the proportion of participants with marked neurological improvement compared with the control group, and the difference was significant (risk ratio (RR) 1.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.60 to 2.49). Authors' conclusions The risk of bias in the included trials was moderate and the sample was small. Hence, although the data in this review show an effective treatment trend of edaravone for acute ischaemic stroke, further large, high-quality trials are required to confirm this trend.

Background Due to language limitations, the abstract of journal article may be the only way for people of non-Chinese speaking countries to know about trials in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). However, little is known about the reporting quality of these trial abstracts. Our study is to assess the reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials (RCT) published in four leading Chinese medical journals of TCM, and to identify any differences in reporting between the Chinese and English version of the same abstract publication. Method Two reviewers hand-searched the Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, the Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, the China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica and the Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion for all abstracts of RCTs published between 2006 and 2007. Two reviewers independently assessed the reporting quality of the Chinese and English version of all eligible abstracts based on a modified version of the CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts (CONSORT for abstracts). Results We identified a total of 345 RCTs of TCM with both a Chinese and English abstract. More than half of Chinese abstracts reported details of the trial participants (68%; 234/345), control group intervention (52%; 179/345), the number of participants randomized (73%; 253/345) and benefits when interpreting the trial results (55%; 190/345). Reporting of methodological quality or key features of trial design and trial results were poor; only 2% (7/345) included details of the trial design, 3% (11/345) defined the primary outcome, 5% (17/345) described the methods of random sequence generation, and only 4% (13/345) reported the number of participants analyzed. No abstracts provided details on allocation concealment and trial registration. The percentage agreement in reporting (between the Chinese and English version of the same abstract) ranged from 84% to 100% across individual checklist item. Conclusion The reporting quality of abstracts of RCTs published in these four TCM journals needs to be improved. Since none of the four journals adopted CONSORT for Abstracts, we hope that the introduction and adoption of CONSORT for Abstracts by TCM journals will lead to an improvement in reporting quality.