Search

Retrospective case series.Predict cost following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) within the 90-day global period using machine learning models.The incidence of ACDF has been increasing with a disproportionate decrease in reimbursement. As bundled payment models become common, it is imperative to identify factors that impact the cost of care.The Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) was accessed in 2018 for all primary ACDFs by the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) procedure codes. Costs were calculated by utilizing the total hospital charge and each hospital's cost-to-charge ratio. Hospital characteristics, such as volume of procedures performed and wage index, were also queried. Readmissions within 90 days were identified, and cost of readmissions was added to the total admission cost to represent the 90-day healthcare cost. Machine learning algorithms were used to predict patients with 90-day admission costs1 SD from the mean.There were 42,485 procedures included in this investigation with an average age of 57.7±12.3 years with 50.6% males. The average cost of the operative admission was $24,874±25,610, the average cost of readmission was $25,371±11,476, and the average total cost was $26,977±28,947 including readmissions costs. There were 10,624 patients who were categorized as high cost. Wage index, hospital volume, age, and diagnosis-related group severity were most correlated with the total cost of care. Gradient boosting trees algorithm was most predictive of the total cost of care (area under the curve=0.86).Bundled payment models utilize wage index and diagnosis-related groups to determine reimbursement of ACDF. However, machine learning algorithms identified additional variables, such as hospital volume, readmission, and patient age, that are also important for determining the cost of care. Machine learning can improve cost-effectiveness and reduce the financial burden placed upon physicians and hospitals by implementing patient-specific reimbursement.

Healthcare regulators and patients are increasingly interested in financial transparency between physicians and the industry because of concerns of bias.Disclosures for every first and last author with a medical degree from the United States associated with a poster or podium presentation at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) 2019 Annual Meeting were identified. Author characteristics were collected. AAOS disclosures were then compared with disclosures from the Open Payments Database to determine whether any inconsistencies existed.In total, 2,503 AAOS presenters were identified, and 1,380 authors met the inclusion criteria. Using AAOS disclosures as the standard comparator, 482 authors (35%) had an inconsistency in any category between AAOS disclosures and the Open Payments Database. Inconsistency rates for each category were 8% for royalties, 10% for speaker's fee, 15% for paid consultant, 16% for research, 14% for stocks, and 1% for other financial support.Although the inconsistency rate for each category has improved over the years, the overall inconsistency rate between physician-reported disclosures at a recent AAOS Annual Meeting and industry-reported relationships reported in the Open Payments Database was still 35%.

Study design This was a retrospective review. Objective The objective of this study was to describe our technique and evaluate the time demand, radiation exposure, and outcomes of minimally invasive posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy (MI-PCLF) using skin-anchored intraoperative navigation (ION). Background Although bone-anchored trackers are most commonly used for ION, a novel technique utilizing noninvasive skin-anchored trackers has recently been described for lumbar surgery and has shown favorable results. There are currently no reports on the use of this technology for cervical surgery. Methods Time demand, radiation exposure, and perioperative outcomes of MI-PCLF using skin-anchored ION were evaluated. Results Twenty-one patients with 36 operative levels were included. Time for ION setup and operative time were a median of 34 and 62 minutes, respectively. Median radiation to the patient was 2.5 mGy from 10 seconds of fluoroscopy time. Radiation exposure to operating room personnel was negligible because they are behind a protective lead shield during ION image acquisition. There were no intraoperative complications or wrong-level surgeries. One patient required a repeat ION spin, and in 2 patients, ION was abandoned and standard fluoroscopy was used. Conclusions Skin-anchored ION for MI-PCLF is feasible, safe, and accurate. It results in short operative times, minimal complications, low radiation to the patient, and negligible radiation to operating room personnel.

BACKGROUND : Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is used to treat multiple conditions, including spondylolisthesis, degenerative disc disorders (DDD), adjacent segment disease (ASD), and degenerative scoliosis. While many advocate for posterior fixation with LLIF, stand-alone LLIF is increasingly being performed. Yet the fusion rate for stand-alone LLIF is unknown. PURPOSE : Determine the fusion rate for stand-alone LLIF. STUDY DESIGN : Systematic Review. METHODS : We queried MEDLINE, COCHRANE, and EMBASE for literature on stand-alone LLIF fusion rate with a publication cutoff of April 2020. LLIF surgery was considered stand-alone when not paired with supplemental posterior fixation. Cohort fusion rate differences were calculated and tested for significance (p RESULTS : A total of 2,735 publications were assessed. Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria, including 736 patients and 1,103 vertebral levels. Mean age was 61.7 years with BMI 26.5 kg/m2. Mean fusion rate was 85.6% (range, 53.0%-100.0%), which did not different significant by number of levels fused (1-level, 2-level, and ≥3-level). Use of rhBMP-2 was reported in 39.3% of subjects, with no difference in fusion rates between studies using rhBMP-2 (87.7%) and those in which rhBMP-2 was not used (83.9%, OR=1.37, p=0.448). Fusion rate did not differ with the addition of a lateral plate, or by underlying diagnosis. All-complication rate was 42.2% and mean reoperation rate was 11.1%, with 2.3% reoperation due to pseudarthrosis. Of the studies comparing stand-alone to circumferential fusion, pooled fusion rate was found to be 80.4% vs. 91.0% (p=0.637). CONCLUSIONS Stand-alone LLIF yields high fusion rates overall. The wide range of reported fusion rates and lower fusion rates in studies involving subsequent surgical reoperation highlights the importance of being well-trained in this technique and employing a rigorous algorithm when indicating patients for stand-alone LLIF. Future research should focus on examining risk factors and patient-reported outcomes in stand-alone LLIF.

STUDY DESIGN A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to identify an association between preoperative opioid use and reoperations rates. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Chronic opioid use is a public health crisis in the United States and has been linked to worse outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. However, no studies have identified an association between preoperative opioid use and reoperations rates. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted using patients from one private insurance database who underwent primary lumbar decompression/discectomy (LDD) or posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF). Preoperative use of five specific opioid medications (tramadol, hydromorphone, oxycodone, hydromorphone, and extended-release oxycodone) was categorized as acute (within 3 months), subacute (acute use and use between 3 and 6 months), or chronic (subacute use and use before 6 months). Multivariate regression, controlling for multilevel surgery, age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, was used to determine the association of each medication on reoperations within 5 years. RESULTS A total of 11,551 patients undergoing LDD and 3291 patients undergoing PLIF/TLIF without previous lumbar spine surgery were identified. In the LDD group, opioid-naive patients had a 5-year reoperation rate of 2.8%, compared with 25.0% and 8.0 with chronic preoperative use of hydromorphone and oxycodone, respectively. In multivariate analysis, any preoperative use of oxycodone was associated with increased reoperations (odds ratios [OR] = 1.4, 2.0, and 2.3, for acute, subacute, and chronic use; P

Study design This was a retrospective review. Objective Provide a validated method of radiographic evaluation of cervical disk replacement (CDR) patients linked to outcomes. Summary of background data Preoperative radiographic criteria for CDRs and the impact of intraoperative positioning remain without formalized guidelines. The association between preexisting degenerative changes, optimal implant positioning, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are not well understood. Our study establishes a systematic radiographic evaluation of preoperative spondylosis, implant placement, and associated clinical outcomes. Methods Preoperative radiographs for CDR patients were evaluated for disk height, facet arthrosis, and uncovertebral joint degeneration. Postoperative radiographs were scored based on the position of the CDR implant on anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs. PROMs including Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) arm pain, VAS neck pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Short Form 12 physical health (SF12-PCS) and mental health (SF12-M) were collected preoperatively, at early follow, and at late follow-up. Results A total of 115 patients were included. Preoperative disk height had the highest reliability, intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.798). Facet arthrosis had the lowest intraclass correlation coefficient at 0.563. Preoperative disk height scores showed a significant correlation with AP radiographs and implant positioning score. Patients with more advanced uncovertebral degenerative changes showed less improvement 6 months postoperatively, based on SF-12 PCS scores (R=0.446, P=0.025). Postoperative implant position on lateral radiograph showed a significant correlation with SF-12 MCS scores at follow-up beyond 6 months (R=0.385, P=0.011). Overall postoperative implant position scores demonstrated significant correlation with SF-12 PCS (R=0.350, P=0.046) scores. Conclusion This study provides a systematic method of evaluation of preoperative and intraoperative radiographs that can optimize outcomes. On the basis of our study, spine surgeons performing cervical disk replacement surgery should consider: (a) the presence of preexisting uncovertebral joint degeneration can negatively impact outcomes, (b) achieving optimal implant positioning can be increasingly difficult with more severe loss of disk height, and (c) overall implant position as judged on AP and lateral fluoroscopy can impact outcomes.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Decompression without fusion is one of common surgical treatments for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with spondylolisthesis, however, some patients will require a subsequent fusion at a later time. No studies have examined the rate and timing of decompression alone for spondylolisthesis in a large population with long term follow-up and it is unclear what the risk factors are for subsequent fusion. No studies have examined the rate, timing and risk factors of decompression alone for spondylolisthesis in large population with long term follow-up. PURPOSE The aim of this study is to examine the rate, timing and risk factors of subsequent fusion for patients after decompression alone for LSS with spondylolisthesis. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE Patients with spondylolisthesis followed more than 5 years after decompression alone at one or two levels for primary lumbar surgery were extracted from both public and private insurance resources in a nationwide insurer database. A total of 5,875 patients in the public insurance population (P1) and 1,456 patients in the private insurance population (P2) were included. OUTCOME MEASURES The rate of patients who needed subsequent fusion was examined at 1 year, 2 years and 5 years. The timing of the subsequent fusion was also investigated. Risk factors for subsequent fusion were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression controlling for age, gender, comorbidities and the presence or absence of claudication. METHODS Age, gender, type of spondylolisthesis (degenerative or isthmic) and comorbidities were collected in each population for demographics. Thirty comorbidities were identified using ICD-9 codes as previously described by Elixhauser et al. Risk factors for subsequent fusion were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression controlling for age, gender, comorbidities and the presence or absence of claudication. RESULTS The rates of patients who needed subsequent fusion were 1.9% at 1 year, 3.5% at 2 years and 6.7% at 5 years in Population 1, whereas they were 4.3% at 1 year, 8.9% at 2 years, 14.6% at 5 years in Population 2. The time to subsequent fusion was 730 (365-1234) days and 588 (300-998) days in P1 and P2, respectively. Age under 70 years, presence of claudication and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) / collagen vascular diseases (CVD) were common risk factors for subsequent fusion at 5 years in both populations. For patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis, RA/CVD was also a risk factor for subsequent fusion at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS Decompression alone, which is a less invasive procedure, demonstrated good outcomes with a low rate of subsequent fusion for LSS with spondylolisthesis. Age under 70 years, presence of claudication and RA/CVD were associated with a higher rate of subsequent fusion at 5 years, and for degenerative spondylolisthesis the presence of RA/CVD had an impact on the rate of subsequent fusion at 2 years. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

BACKGROUND Concerning levels of burnout have been reported among orthopaedic surgeons and residents. Defined as emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, physician burnout is associated with decreased productivity, increased medical errors, and increased risk of suicidal ideation. At the center of burnout research, person-centered approaches focusing on individual characteristics and coping strategies have largely been ineffective in solving this critical issue. They have failed to capture and address important institutional and organizational factors contributing to physician burnout. Similarly, little is known about the relationship between burnout and the working environments in which orthopaedic physicians practice, and on how orthopaedic surgeons at different career stages experience and perceive factors relevant to burnout. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) How does burnout differ among orthopaedic attending surgeons, fellows, and residents? (2) What specific areas of work life are problematic at each of these career stages? (3) What specific areas of work life correlate most strongly with burnout at each of these career stages? METHODS Two hundred orthopaedic surgeons (residents, fellows, and attending physicians) at a single institution were invited to complete an electronic survey. Seventy-four percent (148 of 200) of them responded; specifically, 43 of 46 residents evenly distributed among training years, 18 of 36 fellows, and 87 of 118 attending physicians. Eighty-three percent (123 of 148) were men and 17% (25 of 148) were women. Two validated questionnaires were used. The Maslach Burnout Inventory was used to assess burnout, measuring emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. The Areas of Worklife Survey was used to measure congruency between participants and their work environment in six domains: workload, control, reward, community, fairness, and values. Participants were invited to openly share their experiences and suggest ways to improve burnout and specific work life domains. The main outcome measures were Maslach Burnout Inventory subdomains of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, and Areas of Worklife Survey subdomains of workload, control, reward, community, fairness and values. We compared outcome measures of burnout and work life between groups. Simple linear regression models were used to report correlations between subscales. Stratified analyses were used to identify which group demonstrated higher correlations. All open comments were analyzed and coded to fully understand which areas of work life were problematic and how they were perceived in our population. RESULTS Nine percent (7 of 80) of attending surgeons, 6% (1 of 16) of fellows, and 34% (14 of 41) of residents reported high levels of depersonalization on the Maslach Burnout Inventory (p < 0.001). Mean depersonalization scores were higher (worse) in residents followed by attending surgeons, then fellows (10 ± 6, 5 ± 5, 4 ± 4 respectively; p < 0.001). Sixteen percent (13 of 80) of attending surgeons, 31% (5 of 16) of fellows, and 34% (14 of 41) of residents reported high levels of emotional exhaustion (p = 0.07). Mean emotional exhaustion scores were highest (worse) in residents followed by attending surgeons then fellows (21 ± 12, 17 ± 10, 16 ± 14 respectively; p = 0.11). Workload was the most problematic work life area across all stages of orthopaedic career. Scores in the Areas of Worklife Survey were the lowest (worse) in the workload domain for all subgroups: residents (2.6 ± 0.4), fellows (3.0 ± 0.6), and attending surgeons (2.8 ± 0.7); p = 0.08. Five problematic work life categories were found through open comment analysis: workload, resources, interactions, environment, and self-care. Workload was similarly the most concerning to participants. Specific workload issues identified included administrative load (limited job control, excessive tasks and expectations), technology (electronic medical platform, email overload), workflow (operating room time, patient load distribution), and conflicts between personal, clinical, and academic roles. Overall, worsening emotional exhaustion and depersonalization were most strongly associated with increasing workload (r = - 0.50; p < 0.001; and r = - 0.32; p < 0.001, respectively) and decreasing job control (r = - 0.50; p < 0.001, and r = - 0.41; p < 0.001, respectively). Specifically, in residents, worsening emotional exhaustion and depersonalization most strongly correlated with increasing workload (r = - 0.65; p < 0.001; and r = - 0.53; p < 0.001, respectively) and decreasing job control (r = - 0.49; p = 0.001; and r = - 0.51; p = 0.001, respectively). In attending surgeons, worsening emotional exhaustion was most strongly correlated with increasing workload (r = - 0.50; p < 0.001), and decreasing job control (r = - 0.44; p < 0.001). Among attending surgeons, worsening depersonalization was only correlated with increasing workload (r = - 0.23; p = 0.04). Among orthopaedic fellows, worsening emotional exhaustion and depersonalization were most strongly correlated with decreasing sense of fairness (r = - 0.76; p = 0.001; and r = - 0.87; p < 0.001, respectively), and poorer sense of community (r = - 0.72; p = 0.002; and r = - 0.65; p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS We found higher levels of burnout among orthopaedic residents compared to attending surgeons and fellows. We detected strong distinct correlations between emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and areas of work life across stages of orthopaedic career. Burnout was most strongly associated with workload and job control in orthopaedic residents and attending surgeons and with fairness and community in orthopaedic fellows. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Institutions wishing to better understand burnout may use this approach to identify specific work life drivers of burnout, and determine possible interventions targeted to orthopaedic surgeons at each stage of career. Based on our institutional experience, leadership should investigate strategies to decrease workload by increasing administrative support and improving workflow; improve sense of autonomy by consulting physicians in decision-making; and seek to improve the sense of control in residents and sense of community in fellows.

Background Context Narcotic use amongst patients suffering from lumbar radiculopathy is common, but the clinical benefit of narcotics for lumbar radiculopathy is likely minimal. It is unknown what the impact of preoperative use of narcotics has on outcomes related to lumbar microdiscectomy. Purpose Determine the impact that preoperative opioid use has on postoperative outcomes after lumbar microdisectomy. Study Design Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database. Patient Sample One hundred and twenty-six patients undergoing a microdiscectomy for a lumbar disc herniation. Outcome Measures Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system mental health scores (PROMIS MHS), patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical health scores (PROMIS PHS) and oswestry disability index (ODI). Methods We analyzed a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing a lumbar microdiscectomy for preoperative opioid use. We measured the severity of lumbar pathology on MRI based on degree of facet/disc degeneration and cross-sectional area of the dural tube at the disc herniation. We tracked PROMIS MHS, PROMIS PHS and ODI for patients both preoperatively and postoperatively. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare HRQOL scores and time to MCID for the opioid using cohort (OC) and the nonopioid using cohort (non-OC). We performed a linear regression analysis to determine correlation between preoperative opioid use and postoperative HRQOLs. Results There were 44 of 126 microdiscectomy patients in the OC (32.5%). There was no difference in the dural cross-sectional area (p=.91), degree of facet degeneration (p=.38), or disc degeneration (p=.5) between OC and non-OC. There were no differences in PROMIS PHS, PROMIS MHS or ODI between the OC and non-OC at the preoperative visit and all postoperative time points. There were no differences in time to reach MCID between the OC and non-OC for ODI (p=.9), PROMIS PHS (p=.64) or PROMIS MHS (p=.90). At three months out from surgery there was a statistically significant correlation between pre-op opioid use and ODI (p=.02), PROMIS MHS (p=.02) and PROMIS PHS (p=.049). Conclusions Our results demonstrate that patients that use opioids prior to lumbar microdiscectomy have equivalent postoperative outcomes as those that do not use opioids. Use of higher doses of opioids is associated with worse short-term outcomes.

A Retrospective cohort study.To (1) assess whether diagnoses and surgical plans established during a new patient telemedicine visit changed following an in-person evaluation and (2) determine any differences in perioperative outcomes between patients who only had a telemedicine visit before surgery versus those who had a telemedicine visit followed by an in-person evaluation before surgery.Data on capability of telemedicine to deliver high-quality preoperative assessment without a traditional in-person interaction and physical examination is lacking.Records of patients who had a new patient telemedicine visit and indicated for surgery with documented specific diagnosis as well as surgical plans from a spine department at an urban tertiary center from April 2020 to April 2021 were reviewed. For a subset of patients that had a follow-up in-person evaluation before surgery, these diagnoses and plans were compared. Perioperative outcomes were compared between patients who only had a telemedicine visit before surgery versus those who had a telemedicine visit followed by an in-person evaluation before surgery.A total of 166 patients were included. Of these, 101 patients (61%) only had a new patient telemedicine visit before surgery while 65 (39%) had a telemedicine visit followed by an in-person evaluation. There were no differences in the rate of case cancellations before surgery and patient-reported outcome measures between these two groups ( P0.05). Of 65 patients who had both a telemedicine followed by an in-person visit, the diagnosis was unchanged for 61 patients (94%) and the surgical plan did not change for 52 patients (80%). The main reason for surgical plan change was due to updated findings on new imaging, 10 patients, (77%).The current study suggests that telemedicine evaluations can provide an effective means of preoperative assessment for spine patients.Level 3.

Retrospective cohort study.The aim was to compare the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) across multiple patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients undergoing cervical disc replacement (CDR) for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy versus myeloradiculopathy.To date, a limited number of studies have demonstrated mostly similar results in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy or myeloradiculopathy undergoing CDR. However, each of these previous studies have focused on statistically significant differences, which may not correlate with patient perceived improvements in outcomes or success.Patients who underwent 1 or 2-level CDR with radiculopathy versus myeloradiculopathy were identified, and prospectively collected data was retrospectively reviewed. Demographic variables, preoperative diagnosis, and operative variables were collected for each patient. The following PROs were prospectively collected: Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS)-Neck, VAS-Arm, Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Score (PCS), SF-12 Mental Component Score (MCS), PROMIS Physical Function (PF). An MCID analysis of PROs for each diagnosis group was performed and the percentage of patients achieving the MCID was compared between the two diagnosis groups.Eight-five patients, of which 56% had radiculopathy and 44% had myeloradiculopathy. MCID analysis demonstrated that at 6-week, 12-week, and final postoperative follow-up there was no significant difference in the percentage of patients with radiculopathy or myeloradiculopathy achieving the MCID for each PRO assessed. In both diagnosis groups the percentage of patients achieving the MCID for each PRO continued to increase from the 6-week to final postoperative follow-up except for the SF-12 MCS in patients with myeloradiculopathy.The percentage of patients achieving the MCID was not significantly different at each postoperative period assessed in the radiculopathy and myeloradiculopathy groups treated with CDR. In addition, the percentage of patients achieving the MCID continued to increase from 6 weeks to final follow-up in both groups for almost all PROs assessed.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to initially validate a recent morphological classification of cervical spine deformity pathology. METHODS The records of 10 patients for each of the 3 classification subgroups (flat neck, focal deformity, and cervicothoracic), as well as for 8 patients with coronal deformity only, were extracted from a prospective multicenter database of patients with cervical deformity (CD). A panel of 15 physicians of various training and professional levels (i.e., residents, fellows, and surgeons) categorized each patient into one of the 4 groups. The Fleiss kappa coefficient was utilized to evaluate intra- and interrater reliability. Accuracy, defined as properly selecting the main driver of deformity, was reported overall, by morphotype, and by reviewer experience. RESULTS The overall classification demonstrated a moderate to substantial agreement (round 1: interrater Fleiss kappa = 0.563, 95% CI 0.559–0.568; round 2: interrater Fleiss kappa = 0.612, 95% CI 0.606–0.619). Stratification by level of training demonstrated similar mean interrater coefficients (residents 0.547, fellows 0.600, surgeons 0.524). The mean intrarater score was 0.686 (range 0.531–0.823). A substantial agreement between rounds 1 and 2 was demonstrated in 81.8% of the raters, with a kappa score > 0.61. Stratification by level of training demonstrated similar mean intrarater coefficients (residents 0.715, fellows 0.640, surgeons 0.682). Of 570 possible questions, reviewers provided 419 correct answers (73.5%). When considering the true answer as being selected by at least one of the two main drivers of deformity, the overall accuracy increased to 86.0%. CONCLUSIONS This initial validation of a CD morphological classification system reiterates the importance of dynamic plain radiographs for the evaluation of patients with CD. The overall reliability of this CD morphological classification has been demonstrated. The overall accuracy of the classification system was not impacted by rater experience, demonstrating its simplicity.

Physical function is a critical aspect of patient outcomes. NDI is a widely validated outcome measure in cervical spine disease, yet to what extent its individual domains predict changes in physical function remains unknown.To examine the impact of individual NDI domains on changes in physical function in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery.Prospective Cohort Study.Adult patients undergoing cervical spine surgery, excluding those undergoing surgery for instability due to trauma.Absolute change in outcome measures (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Physical Function [PF], Short Form 36 [SF-36] Physical Component Score [PCS], and Neck Disability Index [NDI]) from pre- to postoperatively, correlation of NDI individual domains with PROMIS PF and SF-36 PCS (preoperatively, postoperatively, and change from pre- to postoperatively).Patients undergoing cervical spine surgery between 2016 and 2018 were prospectively enrolled. Patients completed questionnaires (NDI, SF-36 PCS, and PROMIS PF) preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Patient demographics, including age, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and underlying diagnoses were collected. Comparisons between NDI scores preoperatively versus postoperatively were conducted using Wilcoxon signed rank sum test. Correlations of NDI individual items and PROMIS/SF-36 were assessed using Pearson correlation. A stepwise linear regression analysis was performed to identify NDI items that are independently predictive of PROMIS PF and SF-36 PCS.A total of 137 patients were included in the study, with mean age 56.9 years (range 24.4-84.9). Each of the NDI domains as well as PROMIS PF and SF-36 PCS demonstrated significant improvement following cervical spine surgery (p.001). Changes in all NDI domains demonstrated significant negative correlation with changes in PROMIS PF, with recreation (R=-0.537, p.001), work (R=-0.514, p.001), and pain intensity (R=-0.488, p.001) having the greatest negative correlation. Changes in all NDI domains demonstrated significant negative correlation with changes in SF-36 PCS, with recreation (R=-0.451, p.001), work (R=-0.443, p.001), lifting (R=-0.373, p.001), and driving (R=-0.373, p.001) having the greatest negative correlation. For PROMIS PF, the NDI domains that were independently associated with changes in PF were work (R=-0.092, p=.001), pain intensity (R=-0.089, p=.003), and recreation (R=-0.067, p=.004). For SF-36 PCS, the NDI items that were independently associated with changes in PCS were work (R=-0.269, p=.003) and recreation (R=-0.215, p=.002).All NDI domains improve significantly after cervical spine surgery and demonstrate significant correlation with changes in PROMIS PF and SF-36 PCS. The work, recreation, and pain intensity domains were the only independent predictors of physical function changes postoperatively. Considering physical function, our findings highlight the importance of presenting changes in individual NDI domains in addition to the total score.

STUDY DESIGN This was a prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to establish minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in cervical spine pathology. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA PROMIS enables improved psychometric properties with reduced questionnaire burden through computer adaptive testing. Despite studies showing good correlation with "legacy" outcome measures, literature on the clinical significance of changes in PROMIS scores is scarce. MATERIALS AND METHODS Adult patients undergoing cervical spine surgery at a single institution between 2016 and 2018 were prospectively enrolled. Patients completed questionnaires [Short Form-36 (SF-36), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analogue Scale Arm/Neck, and PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) and Physical Function (PF)] preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. MCID was calculated using distribution-based and SCB using anchor-based methods. The SF-36 Health Transition Item was utilized as an anchor with the cutoff values chosen using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS There were 139 patients meeting inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 56.4 years and diagnoses of myelopathy (n=36), radiculopathy (n=48) and myeloradiculopathy (n=49). There were significant improvements in PROMIS PF, PROMIS PI, NDI, and SF-36 preoperatively to postoperatively (P

Study design Prospective cohort study. Objective To examine preoperative urinary cross-linked n-telopeptide (uNTx) and assess for association with fusion rates in patients undergoing single and multi-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF). Summary of background data Although high rates of fusion have been reported for ACDF, the risk of pseudarthrosis remains substantial. An established marker of bone turnover, uNTx may prove useful as a predictor of fusion. Methods Patients undergoing primary ACDF with allograft/plating technique from 2015 to 2017 by a single surgeon were consecutively enrolled and preoperative uNTx was collected. Patients undergoing revision, with creatinine >1.2, and with improperly-collected uNTx were excluded. Demographics, laboratory values, and fusion status were assessed at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Results Of the 97 patients enrolled, 69 met inclusion criteria. Of included cases, 41%, 33%, 18%, and 8% underwent 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-level ACDF, respectively. Overall, fusion rates were 37.3%, 70.9%, and 95.3% at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. uNTx was higher in the fusion group (31.1 vs. 22.2, P = 0.001) at 6 months and 1 year (30.0 vs. 21.0, P = 0.006), with no difference at 2 years. No differences were identified in the proportion of smokers, immunomodulatory agents, corpectomies, or fusion levels between groups. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that uNTx is an independent predictor of fusion (odds ratio, OR, 1.124, P = 0.003). Both groups experienced improvements in NDI and VAS neck pain at 6 months with no significant differences noted between groups. Of 16 patients with pseudarthrosis at 1 year, 2 underwent posterior cervical fusion for symptoms. Conclusion Preoperative uNTx was greater in patients with successful ACDF fusion compared with patients with pseudarthrosis at 6 months and 1 year. A negative correlation was found between preoperative uNTx and motion on dynamic imaging. These results suggest that uNTx could serve to identify patients at risk for pseudarthrosis after ACDF. Level of evidence 3.

A retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data.The aim of this study was to describe the development of and early experience with an evidence-based enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for lumbar decompression.ERAS protocols have been consistently associated with improved patient experience and outcomes, and reduced cost and length of hospital stay (LoS). Despite successes in other orthopedic subspecialties, ERAS has yet to be established in spine surgery. Here, we report the development of and initial experience with the first comprehensive ERAS pathway for MIS lumbar spine surgery.An evidence-based review of the literature was performed to select components of the ERAS pathway. The pathway was applied to 61 consecutive patients presenting for microdiscectomy or lumbar laminotomy/laminectomy between dates. Data collection was performed by review of the electronic medical record. We evaluated compliance with individual ERAS process measures, and adherence to the overall pathway. The primary outcome was LoS. Demographics, comorbidities, perioperative course, prevalence of opioid tolerance, and factors affecting LoS were also documented.The protocol included 15 standard ERAS elements. Overall pathway compliance was 85.03%. Median LoS was 279 minutes [interquartile range (IQR) 195-398 minutes] overall, 298 minutes (IQR 192-811) for lumbar decompression and 285 minutes (IQR 200-372) for microdiscectomy. There was no correlation between surgical subtype or duration and LoS. Overall, 37% of the cohort was opioid-tolerant at the time of surgery. There was no significant effect of baseline opioid use on LoS, or on the total amount of intraoperative or PACU opioid administration. There were four complications (6.5%) resulting in extended LoS (23 hours).This report comprises the first description of a comprehensive, evidence-based ERAS for spine pathway, tailored for lumbar decompression/microdiscectomy resulting in short LoS, minimal complications, and no readmissions within 90 days of surgery.3.

STUDY DESIGN Retrospective study of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE To determine the incidence, timing, risk factors, and clinical implications of postoperative hematoma requiring reoperation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Postoperative hematomas requiring reoperation are rare but potentially catastrophic complications after ACDF. However, there has been a lack of large cohort studies investigating these complications in the ACDF population despite increasing outpatient procedure volume. METHODS Patients who underwent ACDF in the 2012 to 2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were identified. The primary outcome was an occurrence of hematoma requiring reoperation within 30 days postoperatively. Risk factors for this outcome were identified using multivariate regression. Postoperative length of stay, subsequent complications, and mortality were compared between patients who did and did not develop a hematoma requiring reoperation. RESULTS A total of 37,261 ACDF patients were identified, of which 148 (0.40%) developed a hematoma requiring reoperation (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33%-0.46%). Of the cases that developed this complication, 37% occurred after discharge. Risk factors for the development of hematoma requiring reoperation were multilevel procedures (most notably ≥3 levels, relative risk [RR] = 3.14, 95% CI = 1.86-5.32, P 1.2 (RR = 2.85, 95% CI = 1.42-5.71, P = 0.006), lower BMI (notably body mass index ≤24, RR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.21-3.67, P = 0.008), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ≥3 (RR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.47-2.91, P

Intervertebral disc herniation (IDH) can cause back pain and/or radiculopathy and accounts for a significant portion of patients having spinal surgery in the USA. One of the most impactful and well-executed randomized trials to study diagnosis, treatments, and outcomes in patients with three commonly treated spinal conditions was the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). This study and the subsequent data analyses have resulted in numerous publications related to IDH. The purpose of this review is to summarize SPORT publications with IDH results to better understand what we have learned from this important landmark trial. Publications utilizing SPORT data that reported findings related to IDH patients were identified from Medline, PubMed, and PubMed Central. The primary findings pertaining to IDH were summarized. There were 25 studies identified reporting findings related to IDH from the SPORT data published between 2004 and 2017. Publications in the following areas were summarized: epidemiology and baseline patient characteristics (1), treatment preferences and expectations (2), radiological and MRI (3), primary study objectives at two years (2), four years (1) and eight years (1), subgroup analyses (13), cost-effectiveness (1), and reherniation (1). This report reviewed the current state of SPORT publications related to IDH to identify and summarize what we have learned about diagnosis, patient characteristics, treatments, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness in patients with lumbar disc herniations. Many important findings are now published from this robust trial’s data. Clinicians should incorporate these results into their clinical decision-making and during counseling patients presenting with lumbar disc herniations.

Our institution developed a 1-hour mandatory narcotics-prescribing education program as well as postoperative opioid-prescribing guidelines in response to the opioid epidemic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of this hospital-wide opioid education and subsequent institution of postoperative opioid guidelines on opioid-prescribing practices after ambulatory surgery.This retrospective study was performed at 1 academic orthopaedic hospital. In November 2016, a 1-hour mandatory opioid education program was completed by all hospital prescribers. Postoperative opioid guidelines were then developed and were disseminated in February 2017. All postoperative narcotic prescriptions after ambulatory procedures performed by 3 separate services (hand, sports, and foot and ankle services) were evaluated over 4 months prior to and after the mandatory opioid education and subsequent release of service-specific guidelines.Overall, there was a significant decrease in pills and total oral morphine equivalents prescribed after dissemination of guidelines compared with the pre-intervention cohort procedures (p0.001) performed by the sports and hand services. With regard to the sports medicine service, the mean difference in pills prescribed was 6.47 pills (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4 to 7.5 pills) for knee arthroscopy, 5.6 pills (95% CI, 2.5 to 8.7 pills) for shoulder arthroscopy, and 16.3 pills (95% CI, 13.6 to 19.1 pills) for hip arthroscopy. With regard to the hand service, the mean difference in pills prescribed was 13.0 pills (95% CI, 10.2 to 15.8 pills) for level-1 procedures, 12.4 pills (95% CI, 9.9 to 15.0 pills) for carpal tunnel release, and 21.7 pills (95% CI, 18.0 to 25.3 pills) for distal radial fractures. The decrease in pills prescribed in the post-intervention cohort amounts to almost 30,000 fewer opioid pills prescribed per year after these 6 procedures alone. There was no significant change (p0.05) in either the number of pills or the oral morphine equivalents prescribed after any of the 3 procedures performed by the foot and ankle service (ankle arthroscopy, bunion surgery, and Achilles tendon repair).We developed a prescriber education program and followed up with consensus-based guidelines for postoperative opioid prescriptions. These interventions caused a significant decrease in excessive opioid-prescribing practices after ambulatory orthopaedic surgery at our hospital. We urge initiatives by national orthopaedic organizations to develop and promote education programs and procedure and disease-specific opioid-prescribing guidelines.

Retrospective cohort comparison study.The aim was to compare perioperative complications and 30-day readmission between ambulatory and inpatient posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.Single-level PCF for cervical radiculopathy is increasingly being performed as an ambulatory procedure. Despite this increase, there is a lack of published literature documenting the safety of ambulatory PCF.Patients who underwent PCF (through laminotomy or laminectomy) were identified in the 2005-2018 NSQIP database. Ambulatory procedures were defined as cases that had hospital length of stay=0 days. Inpatient procedures were defined as cases that had length of stay=1-4 days. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, and procedural variables (laminotomy or laminectomy performed) were compared between the 2 cohorts. Propensity score matched comparisons were then performed for postoperative complications and 30-day readmissions between the 2 groups.In total, 795 ambulatory and 1789 inpatient single-level PCF cases were identified. After matching, there were 795 ambulatory and 795 inpatient cases. Statistical analysis after propensity score matching revealed no significant difference in individual complications including 30-day readmission, thromboembolic events, wound complications, and reoperation, or aggregated complications between ambulatory versus matched inpatient procedures. Overall 30-day readmissions after ambulatory single-level PCF were noted for 2.46% of the study population, and the most common reasons were surgical site infections (46%) and pain control (15%).The perioperative outcomes assessed in this study support the conclusion that single-level PCF for cervical radiculopathy can be performed for correctly selected patients in the ambulatory setting without increased rates of 30-day perioperative complications or readmissions compared with inpatient procedures.Level III.

Importance Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction worldwide. It remains unknown whether a ventral or dorsal surgical approach provides the best results. Objective To determine whether a ventral surgical approach compared with a dorsal surgical approach for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy improves patient-reported physical functioning at 1 year. Design, Setting, and Participants Randomized clinical trial of patients aged 45 to 80 years with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy enrolled at 15 large North American hospitals from April 1, 2014, to March 30, 2018; final follow-up was April 15, 2020. Interventions Patients were randomized to undergo ventral surgery (n = 63) or dorsal surgery (n = 100). Ventral surgery involved anterior cervical disk removal and instrumented fusion. Dorsal surgery involved laminectomy with instrumented fusion or open-door laminoplasty. Type of dorsal surgery (fusion or laminoplasty) was at surgeon’s discretion. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was 1-year change in the Short Form 36 physical component summary (SF-36 PCS) score (range, 0 [worst] to 100 [best]; minimum clinically important difference = 5). Secondary outcomes included 1-year change in modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale score, complications, work status, sagittal vertical axis, health resource utilization, and 1- and 2-year changes in the Neck Disability Index and the EuroQol 5 Dimensions score. Results Among 163 patients who were randomized (mean age, 62 years; 80 [49%] women), 155 (95%) completed the trial at 1 year (80% at 2 years). All patients had surgery, but 5 patients did not receive their allocated surgery (ventral: n = 1; dorsal: n = 4). One-year SF-36 PCS mean improvement was not significantly different between ventral surgery (5.9 points) and dorsal surgery (6.2 points) (estimated mean difference, 0.3; 95% CI, −2.6 to 3.1;P = .86). Of 7 prespecified secondary outcomes, 6 showed no significant difference. Rates of complications in the ventral and dorsal surgery groups, respectively, were 48% vs 24% (difference, 24%; 95% CI, 8.7%-38.5%;P = .002) and included dysphagia (41% vs 0%), new neurological deficit (2% vs 9%), reoperations (6% vs 4%), and readmissions within 30 days (0% vs 7%). Conclusions and Relevance Among patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing cervical spinal surgery, a ventral surgical approach did not significantly improve patient-reported physical functioning at 1 year compared with outcomes after a dorsal surgical approach. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02076113

BACKGROUND: A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT), performed by the authors, comparing early surgical microdiscectomy with 6 months of nonoperative care for chronic lumbar radiculopathy showed that early surgery resulted in improved outcomes. However, estimates of the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR), which is often expressed as the cost of gaining one quality-adjusted life year (QALY), of microdiscectomy versus nonsurgical management have varied. Radiculopathy lasting more than 4 months is less likely to improve without surgical intervention and may have a more favorable ICUR than previously reported for acute radiculopathy. QUESTION/PURPOSE: In the setting of chronic radiculopathy caused by lumbar disc herniation, defined as symptoms and/or signs of 4 to 12 months duration, is surgical management more cost-effective than 6 months of nonoperative care from the third-party payer perspective based on a willingness to pay of less than CAD 50,000/QALY? METHODS: A decision analysis model served as the vehicle for the cost-utility analysis. A decision tree was parameterized using data from our single-center RCT that was augmented with institutional microcost data from the Ontario Case Costing Initiative. Bottom-up case costing methodology generates more accurate cost estimates, although institutional costs are known to vary. There were no major surgical cost drivers such as implants or bone graft substitutes, and therefore, the jurisdictional variance would be minimal for tertiary care centers. QALYs derived from the EuroQoL-5D were the health outcome and were derived exclusively from the RCT data, given the paucity of studies evaluating the surgical treatment of lumbar radiculopathy lasting 4 to 12 months. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using the ICUR and a threshold of willingness to pay CAD 50,000 (USD 41,220) per QALY in the base case. Sensitivity analyses were performed to account for the uncertainties within the estimate of cost utility, using both a probabilistic sensitivity analysis and two one-way sensitivity analyses with varying crossover rates after the 6-month nonsurgical treatment had concluded. RESULTS: Early surgical treatment of patients with chronic lumbar radiculopathy (defined as symptoms of 4 to 12 months duration) was cost-effective, in that the cost of one QALY was lower than the CAD 50,000 threshold (note: the purchasing power parity conversion factor between the Canadian dollar (CAD) and the US dollar (USD) for 2019 was 1 USD = 1.213 CAD; therefore, our threshold was USD 41,220). Patients in the early surgical treatment group had higher expected costs (CAD 4118 [95% CI 3429 to 4867]) than those with nonsurgical treatment (CAD 2377 [95% CI 1622 to 3518]), but they had better expected health outcomes (1.48 QALYs [95% CI 1.39 to 1.57] versus 1.30 [95% CI 1.22 to 1.37]). The ICUR was CAD 5822 per QALY gained (95% CI 3029 to 30,461). The 2-year probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the likelihood that early surgical treatment was cost-effective was 0.99 at the willingness-to-pay threshold, as did the one-way sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Early surgery is cost-effective compared with nonoperative care in patients who have had chronic sciatica for 4 to 12 months. Decision-makers should ensure adequate funding to allow timely access to surgical care given that it is highly likely that early surgical intervention is potentially cost-effective in single-payer systems. Future work should focus on both the clinical effectiveness of the treatment of chronic radiculopathy and the costs of these treatments from a societal perspective to account for occupational absences and lost patient productivity. Parallel cost-utility analyses are critical so that appropriate decisions about resource allocation can be made. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, economic and decision analysis.

Study design Retrospective cross-sectional cohort. Objective The aim of this sudy was to determine whether muscle health measurements are associated with health-related quality of life scores (HRQOLs) for patients with lumbar spine pathology. Summary of background data Poor muscle health has been implicated as a source of pain/dysfunction for patients with lumbar spine pathology. Our aim was to quantify the relationship using muscle health measurements and HRQOLs. Methods Three hundred and eight patients were included (mean age 57.7 ± standard deviation 18.2 years' old). We randomly selected patients into a derivation cohort (200) and validation cohort (108) to create our muscle health grade. We measured muscle health by the lumbar indentation value (LIV), goutallier classification (GC), and ratio of paralumbar muscle cross-sectional area over body mass index (PL-CSA/BMI). A muscle health grade was derived based on whether a measurement showed a statistically significant impact on visual analog scale back and leg pain (VAS-leg and VAS-leg), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), short-form 12 physical health score (SF-12 PHS), short-form 12 mental health score (SF-12 MHS) and Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). A variety of statistical tools were used to determine whether there was a relationship between a measurement and HRQOLs. Results In the derivation cohort, a muscle health grade was created based on the GC and PL-CSA/BMI ratio. For patients with a GC ≤2, one point was given. For patients with a PL-CSA/BMI ≥130, one point was given. Patients with 2 points were graded as "A" and 0 or 1 point were graded "B." Within the validation cohort of patients, there was a statistically significant higher PROMIS (mean 34.5 ± standard deviation 12.6 vs. 27.6 ± 14.0, P = 0.002), ODI (38.8 ± 18.3 vs. 45.8 ± 18.1, P = 0.05) and SF-12 PHS (34.7 ± 11.3 vs. 29.1 ± 6.3, P = 0.002) for patients with a good muscle health grade of "A." Conclusion This study offers an objective measurement of muscle health that correlates with HRQOLs for patients with lumbar spine pathology.Level of Evidence: 3.

Study design Randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial. Objective To investigate the effectiveness of local intraoperative corticosteroids at decreasing the severity of swallowing difficulty following multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Summary of background data Dysphagia is a common complication after ACDF, and while for most patients the symptoms are mild and transient, some patients can suffer from severe dysphagia resulting in significant postoperative morbidity. Previous studies investigating the local application of corticosteroids are limited. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial of patients undergoing 2, 3, or 4 level ACDF for radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. Patients undergoing multilevel ACDF were randomized to receive local corticosteroid in the retropharyngeal space or placebo (no steroid). Dysphagia was assessed using validated outcomes including the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (Eat-10) and Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL) Questionnaire both preoperatively and at 1 day (POD1), 2 days (POD2), and 1-month postoperatively. Results One-hundred nine patients had a complete dataset available for analysis. Eat-10 scores were significantly lower in the Steroid group on POD2 (8 vs. 16, P = 0.03) and 1-month postoperatively (2 vs. 5, P = 0.03). A comparison of the individual SWAL-QOL subscale scores demonstrated that patients in the Steroid group had better scores than the Control group in various subscales at all postoperative time points. Significant differences were noted (always in favor of the Steroid group) in 40% of subscales on POD1, 60% of subscales on POD2, and 50% of subscales at 1-month postoperatively. The Control group never had a better SWAL-QOL subscale score at any time point postoperatively. Conclusion Local administration of corticosteroid after multilevel ACDF can decrease postoperative severity and symptomatology of dysphagia during the immediate postoperative period to 1-month postoperatively. The long-term effects of local steroid administration on fusion and other complications will need to be established in future studies.Level of Evidence: 1.

Design This was a narrative review. Purpose Summarize artificial intelligence (AI) fundamentals as well as current and potential future uses in spine surgery. Summary of background data Although considered futuristic, the field of AI has already had a profound impact on many industries, including health care. Its ability to recognize patterns and self-correct to improve over time mimics human cognitive function, but on a much larger scale. Methods Review of literature on AI fundamentals and uses in spine pathology. Results Machine learning (ML), a subset of AI, increases in hierarchy of complexity from classic ML to unsupervised ML to deep leaning, where Language Processing and Computer Vision are possible. AI-based tools have been developed to segment spinal structures, acquire basic spinal measurements, and even identify pathology such as tumor or degeneration. AI algorithms could have use in guiding clinical management through treatment selection, patient-specific prognostication, and even has the potential to power neuroprosthetic devices after spinal cord injury. Conclusion While the use of AI has pitfalls and should be adopted with caution, future use is promising in the field of spine surgery and medicine as a whole. Level of evidence Level IV.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Surgical site infections (SSIs) are medically devastating and financially costly complications after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS). Many strategies exist to reduce their occurrence. The efficacy of intraoperative antibiotics in the wound or bone graft is gaining in popularity, but this practice has not been well-studied in the PSF NMS population. PURPOSE To assess the potential utility of intraoperative local antibiotics in patients with NMS undergoing PSF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. PATIENT SAMPLE Pediatric patients who underwent PSF for NMS were identified from the 2016–2018 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) pediatric spinal fusion datasets. OUTCOME MEASURES Perioperative adverse outcome variables assed included the occurrence of SSI, renal complications, and adverse hospital metrics. METHODS Patient demographic factors, comorbidities, and the use of intraoperative antibiotics in the wound were recorded (a specifically assessed variable in the dataset). The association between the use of intraoperative antibiotics and the occurrence of adverse outcomes/infection was assessed for the entire study population and higher risk sub-populations. RESULTS In total, 1,990 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 87% received local antibiotics. Higher risk patients were more likely to receive local antibiotics in the wound as part of their procedure. When controlling for potentially confounding factors, the use of local antibiotics was not statistically significantly associated with any of the studied adverse outcomes for the overall study population. Subgroup analysis of higher risk patient populations (≥13 levels fused, osteotomy performed, prior deformity surgery, nonasthma lung condition) revealed a significantly decreased risk of SSI in patients undergoing ≥13 level fusions (relative risk: 0.48, 95% confidence interval: 0.25–0.91). CONCLUSIONS With no increased overall risks and reduced SSIs in higher risk NMS patients undergoing PSF, the use of intrawound antibiotics appears to be supported by this dataset.

INTRODUCTION Although the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is increasingly being used, there are few studies assessing the psychometric properties of PROMIS in minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery. Thus, the purpose of this study was to perform a psychometric evaluation of PROMIS Physical Function Computer Adaptive Testing (PROMIS-PF CAT) in MIS lumbar surgery. METHODS The patient-reported outcome measures collected preoperatively and postoperatively of patients undergoing MIS lumbar surgery were retrospectively analyzed to assess responsiveness, coverage, discriminant validity, and concurrent validity of PROMIS-PF CAT. RESULTS Four hundred twenty-one patients were included. The responsiveness of PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) was lower than that of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in the decompression subgroup. Although the ODI had a ceiling effect of 16.7% at 1 year, the Short-Form 12 physical health score and PROMIS-PF did not show floor or ceiling effects. PROMIS-PF demonstrated discriminant validity preoperatively and postoperatively and convergent validity with the ODI, as evidenced by a significant strong negative correlation but not with the Short-Form 12 Physical Health Score, as evidenced by the variability in strength of correlation. CONCLUSIONS Although the PROMIS-PF showed lower responsiveness than the ODI, particularly in the decompression subgroup, it demonstrated discriminant validity preoperatively and postoperatively, convergent validity with ODI, and better coverage than ODI. These findings suggest that the PROMIS-PF CAT demonstrates reasonable psychometric properties and may be a good surrogate for the ODI.

The purpose of this study is to provide a morphometric description of the bony margins of the interlaminar spaces by level in the cervical spine for guidance of safe posterior cervical surgical dissection and decompression. We also aim to describe the impact of increasing static cervical lordosis on the overlap between the lamina.Morphometric measurements of the interlaminar space were performed on 100 consecutive cervical spine CT scans of patients ranging in age from 18 to 50 years were selected. Three raters performed measurements of the interlaminar height measured using two techniques (true interlaminar height and surgical interlaminar height), and interlaminar width from C2-C3 to C7-T1.In total, 100 patients were included. The true interlaminar height was greatest at C2-3, C3-4, C4-5 (5.2 ± 1.4-1.8 mm) and smallest at C6-7 (4.4 ± 1.3 mm). Surgical interlaminar height was greatest at C3-4 (4.2 ± 1.7) and smallest at C6-7 (3.0 ± 1.3 mm). The widest interlaminar space was observed at C3-4 (27.1 ± 2.1 mm) and most narrow at C7-T1 (20.9 ± 2.4 mm). Following multivariate regression, male gender was associated with greater interlaminar widths at each cervical level between C4 and T1 (Table 2). While greater patient height was associated with larger interlaminar height (true and surgical) and width at C2-3 and C4-5, weight was not independently associated with the interlaminar measurements. Increasing C2-C7 lordosis was significantly associated with decreasing true and surgical interlaminar heights at all levels except C7-T1, but was not associated with differences between interlaminar width.The study provides a morphometric analysis of interlaminar anatomy in the cervical spine. Surgeons can apply this information in their pre-operative plan to safely approach the posterior cervical spine.

Background Context Various designs of total disc replacement (TDR) devices have been compared to ACDF with favorable outcomes in FDA-approved investigational device exemption (IDE) trials. The design of M6-C with a compressible viscoelastic nuclear core and an annular structure is substantially different than prior designs and has previously demonstrated favorable kinematics and clinical outcomes in small case series. Purpose To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the novel M6-C compressible artificial cervical disc compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for subjects with single level degenerative cervical radiculopathy. Study Design/Setting Prospective, multicenter, concurrently- and historically-controlled, FDA-approved investigational device exemption (IDE) clinical trial. Patient Sample Subjects with one-level symptomatic degenerative cervical radiculopathy were enrolled and assigned to receive M6-C or ACDF. Outcome Measures Pain and function (NDI, VAS), quality of life (SF-36), safety, neurological and radiographic assessments of motion (both flexion extension and lateral bending) were performed. The primary clinical endpoint was composite clinical success (CCS) at 24 months. Methods Using propensity score subclassification to control for selection bias, 160 M6-C subjects were compared to a matched subset of 189 ACDF controls (46 concurrent and 143 historical controls). Results Both ACDF AND M6-C subjects reported significant improvements in patient reported outcomes at all time points over baseline. Overall SF-36 Physical Component Score and neck and arm pain scores were significantly improved for M6-C as compared to ACDF treatment. CCS and mean NDI improvements were similar between M6-C and ACDF. Correspondingly, there were significantly fewer subjects that utilized pain medication or opioids following M6-C treatment at 24 months relative to baseline. Range of motion was maintained in subjects treated with M6-C. Subsequent surgical interventions, dysphagia rates, and serious adverse events were comparable between groups. Conclusions M6-C treatment demonstrated both safety and effectiveness for the treatment of degenerative cervical radiculopathy. Treatment with M6-C demonstrated non-inferiority for the primary endpoint, indicating a similar ability to achieve Composite Clinical Success (CCS) at 24 months. However, for the secondary endpoints, M6-C subjects demonstrated significantly improved pain and function compared to ACDF subjects, while maintaining range of motion, improving quality of life and decreasing analgesic and opioid usage at 2 years postoperatively relative to baseline.

STUDY DESIGN Follow-up study. OBJECTIVE To determine whether minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery outcomes are different between those who are lost to follow-up and those who are not. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Lost to follow-up patients are a common source of selection bias for clinical outcomes research. Currently, there are no US based studies that evaluate the differences in outcomes of lost to follow-up patients after spine surgeries. METHODS A retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 289 patients who underwent minimally invasive lumbar surgery and were at least 1 year postsurgery was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) lost to follow-up (LTF), defined as patients who had missed more than two consecutive follow-up visits and had not attended their 1-year follow-up appointment; and (2) not lost to follow-up. For the not-LTF cohort, patient response outcome measures (PROMs) (oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) back/leg, Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical/Mental, PROMIS) and return to activities data were collected prospectively at each follow-up. For LTF patients, data were collected through emailed surveys or telephone interviews. PROMs and return to activities data of the two groups were compared. Sub-group analysis by type of surgery (decompression or fusion) was also performed. RESULTS For the entire cohort, independent t test analysis showed LTF patients had greater improvement in PROMIS Physical Function scores than those who were not-LTF (15.08 vs. 10.38, P = 0.026). For fusion surgeries, LTF patients showed a greater improvement in ODI (-30.94 vs. -16.23, P = 0.003) VAS back (-4.92 vs. -2.99, P = 0.044), and PROMIS-PF (16.09 vs. 10.38, P = 0.049). There were no significant differences in complication rates between LTF and not LTF patients. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar surgery-in particular lumbar fusions-who are lost to follow-up and responded to subsequent email and phone interviews showed greater improvements in self-reported outcomes than those who continued to follow-up. Thus, our results suggest that a substantial subset of patients who are lost to follow-up do not fare worse than those who do follow-up. However, an opposite response cannot be excluded in those who did not respond to email and phone interviews. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.

Peak performance is the ability to achieve optimal outcomes or performance of a given task in a consistent manner. Commonly studied in athletes and musicians, this topic is less often studied in medicine and rarely broached for trainees. However, residency is a crucial period of training where foundations for future success are sewn into habit and daily practice. As educators, we should aim to equip trainees with the tools necessary to achieve peak performance. Studies in athletes and musicians focus on achieving peak performance by setting goals, mastering skills through deliberate practice, perseverance, grit, and discipline. Mentorship is also an important element to streamline efforts for the trainee and help them to focus. In the following article, we review the current literature on applying these principles to surgical trainees to achieve peak performance.

Retrospective cohort.To describe our technique for and evaluate the time demand, radiation exposure and outcomes of skin-anchored intraoperative three-dimensional navigation (ION) in minimally invasive (MIS) lumbar surgery, and to compare these parameters to 2D fluoroscopy for MI-TLIF.Limited visualization of anatomic landmarks and narrow access corridor in MIS procedures result in greater reliance on image guidance. Although two-dimensional fluoroscopy has historically been used, ION is gaining traction.Patients who underwent MIS lumbar microdiscectomy, laminectomy, or MI-TLIF using skin-anchored ION and MI-TLIF by the same surgeon using 2D fluoroscopy were selected. Operative variables, radiation exposure, and short-term outcomes of all procedures were summarized. Time-demand and radiation exposure of fluoroscopy and ION for MI-TLIF were compared.Of the 326 patients included, 232 were in the ION cohort (92 microdiscectomies, 65 laminectomies, and 75 MI-TLIFs) and 94 in the MI-TLIF using 2D fluoroscopy cohort. Time for ION setup and image acquisition was a median of 22 to 24 minutes. Total fluoroscopy time was a median of 10 seconds for microdiscectomy, 9 for laminectomy, and 26 for MI-TLIF. Radiation dose was a median of 15.2 mGy for microdiscectomy, 16.6 for laminectomy, and 44.6 for MI-TLIF, of this, 93%, 95%, and 37% for microdiscectomy, laminectomy, and MI-TLIF, respectively were for ION image acquisition, with the rest attributable to the procedure. There were no wrong-level surgeries. Compared with fluoroscopy, ION for MI-TLIF resulted in lower operative times (92 vs. 108 min, P 0.0001), fluoroscopy time (26 vs. 144 s, P 0.0001), and radiation dose (44.6 vs. 63.1 mGy, P = 0.002), with equivalent time-demand and length of stay. ION lowered the radiation dose by 29% for patients and 55% for operating room personnel.Skin-anchored ION does not increase time-demand compared with fluoroscopy, is feasible, safe and accurate, and results in low radiation exposure.3.

The evaluation and management of spinal disorders is complex and constantly evolving. Back pain and spinal deformity are substantial contributors to hospital and outpatient physician visits even for young patients. With new insights into the etiology, clinical presentation, and evaluation, children can be more accurately diagnosed and treated. Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis may undergo selective fusion to preserve motion segments, and in some cases, vertebral body tethering or other growth-modification techniques may provide correction with motion preservation in this rapidly changing specialty. The understanding of spinopelvic parameters (pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope) and sagittal balance as they relate to clinical health status has provided surgeons with valuable guidance when managing pediatric and adult spinal deformity. An evidence-based approach to the management of spinal disorders across the continuum of ages has the goal of improving the value of care through optimization of outcomes and limitation of costs and complications. There are new paradigms in the management of spinal disorders and evidence-based approaches to the evaluation and management of patients across the ages.

Background Context The presence of missing data is a limitation of large datasets, including the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). In addressing this issue, most studies use complete case analysis, which excludes cases with missing data, thus potentially introducing selection bias. Multiple imputation, a statistically rigorous approach that approximates missing data and preserves sample size, may be an improvement over complete case analysis. Purpose The present study aims to evaluate the impact of using multiple imputation in comparison with complete case analysis for assessing the associations between preoperative laboratory values and adverse outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures. Study Design/Setting This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Patient Sample Patients undergoing one-level ACDF were identified in NSQIP 2012–2015. Outcome Measures Perioperative adverse outcome variables assessed included the occurrence of any adverse event, severe adverse events, and hospital readmission. Methods Missing preoperative albumin and hematocrit values were handled using complete case analysis and multiple imputation. These preoperative laboratory levels were then tested for associations with 30-day postoperative outcomes using logistic regression. Results A total of 11,999 patients were included. Of this cohort, 63.5% of patients had missing preoperative albumin and 9.9% had missing preoperative hematocrit. When using complete case analysis, only 4,311 patients were studied. The removed patients were significantly younger, healthier, of a common body mass index, and male. Logistic regression analysis failed to identify either preoperative hypoalbuminemia or preoperative anemia as significantly associated with adverse outcomes. When employing multiple imputation, all 11,999 patients were included. Preoperative hypoalbuminemia was significantly associated with the occurrence of any adverse event and severe adverse events. Preoperative anemia was significantly associated with the occurrence of any adverse event, severe adverse events, and hospital readmission. Conclusions Multiple imputation is a rigorous statistical procedure that is being increasingly used to address missing values in large datasets. Using this technique for ACDF avoided the loss of cases that may have affected the representativeness and power of the study and led to different results than complete case analysis. Multiple imputation should be considered for future spine studies.

To determine the rate of preoperative modifiable laboratory abnormalities (both major and minor) and the association with early postoperative medical and surgical complications. All patients undergoing thoracolumbar three-column osteotomy between 2013 and 2016 with preoperative laboratory data were identified. Potential preoperative modifiable laboratory abnormalities (major and minor) were assessed including hyponatremia (sodium

Study design Cost-effectiveness analysis. Objective To investigate 7-years cost-effectiveness of two-level cervical disc replacement (CDR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Summary of background data CDR and ACDF are both effective treatment strategies for managing degenerative conditions of the cervical spine. CDR has been shown to be a more-cost effective intervention in the short term, but the long-term cost-effectiveness has not been established. Methods We analyzed 7-years follow-up data from the two-level Medtronic Prestige LP investigational device exemption study. Short-form 36 (SF-36) data were converted into health utility scores using the SF-6D algorithm. Costs were based on direct costs from the payer perspective, and effectiveness was measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set to $50,000/QALY. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted via Monte Carlo simulation. Results Two-level CDR had a 7-year cost of $176,654.19, generated 4.65 QALYs, and had a cost-effectiveness ratio of $37,993.53/QALY. Two-level ACDF had a 7-year cost of $158,373.48, generated 4.44 QALYs, and had a cost-effectiveness ratio of $35,635.72. CDR was associated with an incremental cost of $18,280.71 and an incremental effectiveness of 0.21 QALYs, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $89,021.04, above the WTP threshold. Our Monte Carlo simulation demonstrated CDR would be chosen 46% of the time based on 10,000 simulations. Conclusion Two-level CDR and ACDF are both cost-effective procedures at 7-year follow up for treating degenerative conditions of the cervical spine. Based on an ICER of $89,021.04/QALY, we cannot conclude which treatment is the more cost-effective option at 7-years. CDR would be chosen 46% of the time based on 10,000 iterations of our Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Level of evidence 3.

BACKGROUND Surgical treatments for adult cervical spinal deformity (ACSD) are often complex and have high complication rates. OBJECTIVE To assess all-cause mortality following ACSD surgery. METHODS ACSD patients presenting for surgical treatment were identified from a prospectively collected multicenter database. Clinical and surgical parameters and all-cause mortality were assessed. RESULTS Of 123 ACSD patients, 120 (98%) had complete baseline data (mean age, 60.6 yr). The mean number of comorbidities per patient was 1.80, and 80% had at least 1 comorbidity. Surgical approaches included anterior only (15.8%), posterior only (50.0%), and combined anterior/posterior (34.2%). The mean number of vertebral levels fused was 8.0 (standard deviation [SD] = 4.5), and 23.3% had a 3-column osteotomy. Death was reported for 11 (9.2%) patients at a mean of 1.1 yr (SD = 0.76 yr; range = 7 d to 2 yr). Mean follow-up for living patients was 1.2 yr (SD = 0.64 yr). Causes of death included myocardial infarction (n = 2), pneumonia/cardiopulmonary failure (n = 2), sepsis (n = 1), obstructive sleep apnea/narcotics (n = 1), subsequently diagnosed amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (n = 1), burn injury related to home supplemental oxygen (n = 1), and unknown (n = 3). Deceased patients did not significantly differ from alive patients based on demographic, clinical, or surgical parameters assessed, except for a higher major complication rate (excluding mortality; 63.6% vs 22.0%, P = .006). CONCLUSION All-cause mortality at a mean of 1.2 yr following surgery for ACSD was 9.2% in this prospective multicenter series. Causes of death were reflective of the overall high level of comorbidities. These findings may prove useful for treatment decision making and patient counseling in the context of the substantial impact of ACSD.

BACKGROUND Despite the potential for profound impact of adult cervical deformity (ACD) on function and health-related quality of life (HRQOL), there are few high-quality studies that assess outcomes of surgical treatment for these patients. OBJECTIVE To determine the impact of surgical treatment for ACD on HRQOL. METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study of surgically treated ACD patients eligible for 1-yr follow-up. Baseline deformity characteristics, surgical parameters, and 1-yr HRQOL outcomes were assessed. RESULTS Of 77 ACD patients, 55 (71%) had 1-yr follow-up (64% women, mean age of 62 yr, mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0.6, previous cervical surgery in 47%). Diagnoses included cervical sagittal imbalance (56%), cervical kyphosis (55%), proximal junctional kyphosis (7%) and coronal deformity (9%). Posterior fusion was performed in 85% (mean levels = 10), and anterior fusion was performed in 53% (mean levels = 5). Three-column osteotomy was performed in 24% of patients. One year following surgery, ACD patients had significant improvement in Neck Disability Index (50.5 to 38.0, P < .001), neck pain numeric rating scale score (6.9 to 4.3, P < .001), EuroQol 5 dimension (EQ-5D) index (0.51 to 0.66, P < .001), and EQ-5D subscores: mobility (1.9 to 1.7, P = .019), usual activities (2.2 to 1.9, P = .007), pain/discomfort (2.4 to 2.1, P < .001), anxiety/depression (1.8 to 1.5, P = .014). CONCLUSION Based on a prospective multicenter series of ACD patients, surgical treatment provided significant improvement in multiple measures of pain and function, including Neck Disability Index, neck pain numeric rating scale score, and EQ-5D. Further follow-up will be necessary to assess the long-term durability of these improved outcomes.

Odontoid fractures are the most common fracture of the axis and the most common cervical spine fracture in patients over 65. Despite their frequency, there is considerable ambiguity regarding optimal management strategies for these fractures in the elderly. Poor bone health and medical comorbidities contribute to increased surgical risk in this population; however, nonoperative management is associated with a risk of nonunion or fibrous union. We provide a review of the existing literature and discuss the classification and evaluation of odontoid fractures. The merits of operative vs nonoperative management, fibrous union, and the choice of operative approach in elderly patients are discussed. A treatment algorithm is presented based on the available literature. We believe that type I and type III odontoid fractures can be managed in a collar in most cases. Type II fractures with any additonal risk factors for nonunion (displacement, comminution, etc) should be considered for surgical management. However, the risks of surgery in an elderly population must be carefully considered on a case-by-case basis. In a frail elderly patient, a fibrous nonunion with close follow-up is an acceptable outcome. If operative management is chosen, a posterior approach is should be chosen when fracture- or patient-related factors make an anterior approach challenging. The high levels of morbidity and mortality associated with odontoid fractures should encourage all providers to pursue medical co-management and optimization of bone health following diagnosis.

STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. OBJECTIVE To determine the postoperative morbidity of one- and two-level outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) relative to inpatient cases, and risk factors for postdischarge complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA ACDF is increasingly performed as an outpatient procedure, with evidence demonstrating outpatient one-level ACDF to be associated with fewer postoperative complications than inpatients. The postoperative morbidity and safety of outpatient two-level ACDF as a separate cohort is not well understood. METHODS ACDF cases from NSQIP 2011 to 2014 were identified. Differences in baseline characteristics between inpatient and outpatient cases were determined, and propensity score adjustment was used to account for selection bias. One- and two-level ACDF cohorts were analyzed separately. Unadjusted and propensity-adjusted multivariable logistic regressions were performed to determine the risk of postoperative complications in outpatient cases relative to inpatient cases, and predictors of postdischarge complications. RESULTS A total of 22,006 ACDF cases were included, of which 4759 were outpatient procedures. Propensity-adjusted differences in preoperative characteristics were all P > 0.5, indicating successful adjustment of selection bias. Among 6890 two-level cases, of which 1429 (20.7%) were outpatient, the overall unadjusted rate of complications was 1.47% for outpatients and 3.94% for inpatients, P

Background Context Patient satisfaction is becoming an increasing common proxy for surgical quality; however, the correlation between patient satisfaction and surgical outcomes 2 and 5 years after anterior cervical surgery has not been evaluated. Purpose The study aimed to determine if patient satisfaction is predicted by improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) 2 and 5 years after anterior cervical spine surgery. Study Design This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Patient Sample The sample included patients enrolled in the Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial comparing total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Outcome Measures The outcome measures were visual analog scale (VAS) neck pain score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Short-Form 12-Item scores, as well as patient satisfaction. Methods Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine if improvement in different PRO metrics can accurately identify patient satisfaction. Additionally, a logistic regression analysis was performed on the results at 24 months and 60 months to identify independent predictors of patient satisfaction. This research was supported by LDR (Zimmer Biomet) 13785 Research Boulevard - Suite 200 Austin, TX 78750. Results Data were available for 512 patients at 60 months. At 24 months postoperatively, NDI score improvement (area under the curve [AUC]=0.806), absolute NDI score (AUC=0.823), and absolute VAS neck pain score (AUC=0.808) were all excellent predictors of patient satisfaction. At 60 months postoperatively, NDI score improvement (AUC=0.815), absolute NDI score (AUC=0.839), VAS neck pain score improvement (AUC=0.803), and absolute VAS neck pain score (AUC=0.861) were all excellent predictors of patient satisfaction. Conclusions In patients undergoing one- and two-level anterior cervical spine surgery, between 2 and 5 years postoperatively, patient satisfaction is significantly predicted by PROs, including the VAS neck score and the NDI.

Study design A retrospective study of patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Objective To determine the most common reasons for readmission within 30 days after elective ACDF. Summary of background data ACDF is a commonly performed surgery that is safe and effective for treating a variety of cervical spine pathologies. With new quality-based reimbursements tied to readmissions within 30 days of discharge, better understanding of the causes of readmissions is, however, needed. Methods Patients undergoing ACDF in the NSQIP database from 2012 to 2014 were reviewed. The overall rate of readmission and documented reasons for readmission were collected. Multivariate regression was then used to determine risk factors for readmissions. Results A total of 17,088 patients undergoing elective ACDF were identified. There were 545 (3.2%) readmissions within 30 postoperative days. Of the readmitted patients, 293 (53.8%) were readmitted for nonsurgical site-related reasons, with neuropsychiatric (n = 44), cardiovascular (n = 39), and pneumonia (n = 37) being the most common reasons. A total of 184 patients (33.8%) were readmitted for surgical site-related reasons, with surgical site infection (n = 42), hemorrhage/hematoma (n = 42), and dysphagia (n = 32) being the most common reasons. A total of 84 patients (15.6%) had undocumented reasons for readmission. In multivariate analysis, only older age and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class were independently associated with readmissions. Conclusion Most readmissions after ACDF were due to nonsurgical site-related reasons, suggesting the importance of careful patient selection, aggressive preoperative medical optimization, and adequate postoperative management. Level of evidence 3.

Prospective observational study OBJECTIVE.: The aim of this study was to record daily opioid use and pain levels after 1-level lumbar decompression or microdiscectomy.The standardization of opioid-prescribing practices through guidelines can decrease the risk of misuse and lower the number of pills available for diversion in this high-risk patient population. However, there is a paucity of quantitative data on the "minimum necessary amount" of opioid appropriate for post-discharge prescriptions.At two institutions between September 2017 and 2018, we prospectively enrolled 85 consecutive adult patients who underwent one-level lumbar decompression or microdiscectomy. Patients with a history of opioid dependence were excluded. Daily opioid consumption and pain scores were collected using an automated text-messaging-based platform for 6 weeks or until consumption ceased. Refills during the study period were monitored. Patients were asked for the number of pills left over and the method of disposal. Opioid use was converted to oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). Results are also reported in terms of "pills" (oxycodone 5 mg equivalents) to facilitate clinical applications. Risk factors were compared between patients in the top and bottom half of opioid consumption.Total opioid consumption ranged from 0 to 118 pills, with a median consumption of 32 pills (236.3 OME). Seventy-five percent of patients consumed ≤57 pills (431.3 OME). Mean Numeric Rating Scale pain scores declined steadily over the first 2 weeks. By postoperative day 7 half of the study population had ceased taking opioids altogether. Only 22.4% of patients finished their initial prescription, and only 9.4% of patients obtained a refill.These data may be used to formulate evidence-based opioid prescription guidelines, establish benchmarks, and identify patients at the higher end of the opioid use spectrum.2.

STUDY DESIGN Prospective Cohort Study OBJECTIVE.: The aim of this study was to validate the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) against existing patient-reported outcomes in the cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Current patient-reported outcomes in cervical spine have substantial limitations. PROMIS offers the potential for improved psychometric properties with reduced questionnaire burden. METHODS Adult patients undergoing cervical spine surgery at a single institution between 2016 and 2018 were prospectively enrolled. Patients completed questionnaires (36-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36], Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale arm/neck, and PROMIS pain Interference [PI], physical Function [PF], and Upper Extremity [UE]) preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Demographic data, diagnosis, and procedural data were recorded. Validation of the instruments was completed with a Rasch Model as well as measurement of coverage, efficiency, test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and convergent validity. RESULTS Of 197 patients who completed the preoperative survey, 164 were eligible for 6-month follow-up and 139 completed 6-month postoperative surveys. The most common diagnoses were radiculopathy (37.6%), myeloradiculopathy (30.5%), and myelopathy (28.4%). All studied instruments had acceptable fit to a Rasch model. PROMIS computer adaptive testings (CATs) demonstrated improved average time to completion for PI (39 seconds), PF (47 seconds), and UE (54 seconds), compared to NDI (117 s) and SF-36 PCS (175 seconds). Responsiveness for PROMIS CATs was similar to NDI and SF-36, test-retest reliability was lower for PI (intraclass correlation: 0.68), PF (0.70), and UE (0.59), compared to NDI (0.86) and PCS (0.85). For convergent validity, PI was strongly correlated to NDI and PF to SF-36 PCS. There were no significant floor or ceiling effects for the PROMIS domains, although UE had preoperative clustering (n = 18) at a high score (56.4) and PI had postoperative clustering (n = 27) at a low score (38.7). CONCLUSION PROMIS CATs demonstrate several advantages, including efficiency and responsiveness, while demonstrating good convergent validity with legacy instruments. Nevertheless, CATs had lower test-retest reliability and had significant clustering at higher levels of function for the PI and UE CATs. These limitations must be considered before broad adoption of CATs in cervical spine patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Pedicle screw placement is a demanding surgical skill as a spine surgeon can face challenges including variations in pedicle morphology and spinal deformities. Available CT simulators for spine pedicle placement can be very costly and hands-on cadaver courses are limited by specimen availability and are not readily accessible. PURPOSE To conduct validation of a simulated training device for essential spine surgery skills. DESIGN Cross-sectional, empirical study of physician performance on a surgical simulator model. SAMPLE Spine attending physicians and residents from four different academic institutions across the United States. OUTCOME MEASURES Performance metrics on two surgical simulator tasks. METHODS After IRB approval, an inexpensive ($30) simulator was developed to test two main psychomotor tasks (1) creation of the pedicle screw path with a standard gearshift probe without cortical breaks and (2) the ability to palpate for the presence or absence of cortical breaches as well as determine the location of wall defects. Orthopedic and neurosurgery residents (N=72) as well as spine attending surgeons (N=26) participated from four different institutions. To test construct validity, performance metrics were compared between participants of different training status through one-way analysis of variance and linear regression analysis, with significance set at p RESULTS Spine attending surgeons consistently scored higher than the residents, in the screw trajectory task with triangular base (p=.0027) and defect probing task (p=.0035). In defect probing, performance improved with linear trend by number of residency training years with approaching significance (p=.0721). In that task, independent of institutional affiliation, PGY-2 residents correctly identified an average of 1.25±0.43 fewer locations compared with attending physicians (p=.0049). More than 80% of the spine attendings reported they would use the simulator for training purposes. CONCLUSIONS This low-cost fundamentals of spine surgery simulator detected differences in performances between spine attending surgeons and surgical residents. Programs should consider implementing a simulator such as fundamentals of spine surgery to assess and develop pedicle screw placement ability outside of the operating room.

Aging is a major risk factor of intervertebral disc degeneration and a leading cause of back pain. Pathological changes associated with disc degeneration include the absence of large, vacuolated and reticular‐shaped nucleus pulposus cells, and appearance of smaller cells nested in lacunae. These small nested cells are conventionally described as chondrocyte‐like cells; however, their origin in the intervertebral disc is unknown. Here, using a genetic mouse model and a fate mapping strategy, we have found that the chondrocyte‐like cells in degenerating intervertebral discs are, in fact, nucleus pulposus cells. With aging, the nucleus pulposus cells fuse their cell membranes to form the nested lacunae. Next, we characterized the expression of sonic hedgehog (SHH), crucial for the maintenance of nucleus pulposus cells, and found that as intervertebral discs age and degenerate, expression of SHH and its target Brachyury is gradually lost. The results indicate that the chondrocyte‐like phenotype represents a terminal stage of differentiation preceding loss of nucleus pulposus cells and disc collapse.

Aims The aim of this study was to determine the general postoperative opioid consumption and rate of appropriate disposal of excess opioid prescriptions in patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients and Methods In total, 112 patients undergoing surgery with one of eight arthroplasty surgeons at a single specialty hospital were prospectively enrolled. Three patients were excluded for undergoing secondary procedures within six weeks. Daily pain levels and opioid consumption, quantity, and disposal patterns for leftover medications were collected for six weeks following surgery using a text-messaging platform. Results Overall, 103 of 109 patients (94.5%) completed the daily short message service (SMS) surveys. The mean oral morphine equivalents (OME) consumed during the six weeks post-surgery were 639.6 mg (sd 323.7; 20 to 1616) corresponding to 85.3 tablets of 5 mg oxycodone per patient. A total of 66 patients (64.1%) had stopped taking opioids within six weeks of surgery and had the mean equivalent of 18 oxycodone 5 mg tablets remaining. Only 17 patients (25.7%) appropriately disposed of leftover medications. Conclusion These prospectively collected data provide a benchmark for general opioid consumption after uncomplicated primary unilateral TKA. Many patients are prescribed more opioids than they require, and leftover medication is infrequently disposed of appropriately, which increases the risk for illicit diversion. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(7 Supple C):98–103

As the focus in spine surgery has shifted from radiographic to patient-centric outcome, patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) are becoming increasingly important. They are linked to patient satisfaction, and are used to assess healthcare expenditure, determine compensation and evaluate cost-effectiveness. Thus, PROMs are important to various stakeholders, including patients, physicians, payers, and healthcare institutions. Thus, it is vital to establish methods to interpret and evaluate these outcome measures.To evaluate the correlation between Neck Disability Index (NDI), Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) and Short Form-12 Physical Health Score (SF-12 PHS) in cervical spinal surgery in order to determine the validity of PROMIS-PF in these patients.Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.Consecutive patients who underwent cervical surgery for degenerative spinal pathology with a minimum of 3 months follow-up.Self-reported measures that is, PROMs including NDI, PROMIS-PF, and SF-12 PHS.No funding was received for this study. The authors report no relevant conflict of interest. PROM collected preoperatively and at each follow-up were analyzed using Pearson product-moment correlation.Of the 121 patients included, 66 underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, 42 cervical disc replacement, 13 posterior cervical decompression with or without fusion. A statistically significant improvement was achieved in all PROMs by 6 weeks and maintained at 1 year. Furthermore, the percentage of patients achieving an improvement greater than minimum clinically important difference was similar for NDI and PROMIS-PF, particularly at a follow-up of 3 months or more. A statistically significant negative correlation was seen between NDI and PROMIS-PF, which was moderate preoperatively and in the early postoperative period (r=-0.565 to -0.600), and strong at 3 months or longer follow-up (r=-0.622 to -0.705). A statistically significant, negative correlation was also seen between SF-12 PHS and NDI, which was moderate preoperatively and at 6 weeks (r=-0.5551 to -0.566); and strong at all other time-points (r=-0.678 to -0.749). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between SF-12 PHS and PROMIS-PF, which was strong to very-strong at all time-points (r=0.644-0.822), except at 2 weeks (r=0.570).Although NDI and SF-12 have been used for several years, PROMIS is a new outcome measure that is increasingly being implemented. The results of our study demonstrate the convergent and discriminant validity of PROMIS-PF, supported by the strong correlation between SF-12 PHS and PROMIS-PF at all time-points and the moderate correlation between NDI and PROMIS-PF preoperatively and in the early postoperative period, respectively. Thus, while PROMIS-PF may not be a good surrogate for disease-specific outcome measures, it may extend value as a precise and efficient general health tool.

This was a retrospective cohort study.The main objectives of this study were to identify epidemiological trends, differences, and complications in patients undergoing surgical treatment for single-level cervical radiculopathy (SLCR).SLCR that fails nonoperative management is effectively treated with either anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), cervical disc replacement (CDR), or posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF). Although studies have shown that all 3 options are clinically effective, trends in usage, differences in patient population, and differences in complications remain unknown.Patients who underwent either ACDF, CDR, or PCF in the treatment of SLCR from 2010 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Demographic data consisted of sex, age, ASA class, body mass index, and inpatient/outpatient status. Complications included surgical site infection, pneumonia, reintubation, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, readmissions, reoperations, operating time, and hospital length of stay. Utilization trends by year among the 3 procedures were also analyzed.A total of 1102 patients with SLCR treated with single-level ACDF, CDR, or PCF were identified in NSQIP from 2010 to 2016. There was a relative increase in the number of CDR procedures (7.7%-16.1%) and a corresponding decrease in PCF procedures (20.3%-10.6%) without a significant effect on ACDF procedures (72.0%-73.3%). Patients who underwent CDR were younger and in a lower ASA class than those undergoing ACDF or PCF. Patients undergoing PCF were more likely to be treated as an outpatient. PCF procedures also had the shortest operating time and hospital length of stay. There were no significant differences in complications among the 3 procedures. Moreover, there were no significant trends in demographics or outcome measures.ACDF remains the most common surgical treatment for patients with SLCR, and its utilization has remained consistent. Meanwhile, the increased utilization of CDR for the treatment of SLCR has resulted in a corresponding decrease in the utilization of PCF.