1. Four consecutive yearly point-prevalence studies in Wales indicate lack of improvement in sepsis care on the wards
- Author
-
Maja Kopczynska, Harry Unwin, Richard J. Pugh, Ben Sharif, Thomas Chandy, Daniel J. Davies, Matthew E. Shield, David E. Purchase, Samuel C. Tilley, Arwel Poacher, Lewis Oliva, Sam Willis, Isabelle E. Ray, John Ng C. Hui, Bethany C. Payne, Eilis F. Wardle, Fiona Andrew, Hei Man Priscilla Chan, Jack Barrington, Jay Hale, Joanna Hawkins, Jess K. Nicholas, Lara E. Wirt, Lowri H. Thomas, Megan Walker, Myat P. Pan, Tallulah Ray, Umair H. Asim, Victoria Maidman, Zeid Atiyah, Zain M. Nasser, Zhao Xuan Tan, Laura J. P. Tan, Tamas Szakmany, and The Welsh Digital Data Collection Platform collaborators
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Fever ,Epidemiology ,Science ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Psychological intervention ,Prevalence ,Article ,Antimicrobial therapy ,Sepsis ,medicine ,Humans ,Hospital Mortality ,Cardiopulmonary resuscitation ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Wales ,Multidisciplinary ,business.industry ,Length of Stay ,Middle Aged ,Prognosis ,medicine.disease ,Early warning score ,Survival Rate ,Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care ,Heart failure ,Emergency medicine ,Sepsis Six ,Medicine ,Female ,Bacterial infection ,business ,Patient Care Bundles ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
The ‘Sepsis Six’ bundle was promoted as a deliverable tool outside of the critical care settings, but there is very little data available on the progress and change of sepsis care outside the critical care environment in the UK. Our aim was to compare the yearly prevalence, outcome and the Sepsis Six bundle compliance in patients at risk of mortality from sepsis in non-intensive care environments. Patients with a National Early Warning Score (NEWS) of 3 or above and suspected or proven infection were enrolled into four yearly 24-h point prevalence studies, carried out in fourteen hospitals across Wales from 2016 to 2019. We followed up patients to 30 days between 2016–2019 and to 90 days between 2017 and 2019. Out of the 26,947 patients screened 1651 fulfilled inclusion criteria and were recruited. The full ‘Sepsis Six’ care bundle was completed on 223 (14.0%) occasions, with no significant difference between the years. On 190 (11.5%) occasions none of the bundle elements were completed. There was no significant correlation between bundle element compliance, NEWS or year of study. One hundred and seventy (10.7%) patients were seen by critical care outreach; the ‘Sepsis Six’ bundle was completed significantly more often in this group (54/170, 32.0%) than for patients who were not reviewed by critical care outreach (168/1385, 11.6%; p Trial registration Defining Sepsis on the Wards ISRCTN 86502304 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN86502304 prospectively registered 09/05/2016.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF