Search

Clinical guidelines indicate that in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), anticoagulant treatment should be continued beyond 6 months as long as the cancer is active. We aimed to analyse the safety of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) beyond 12 months in patients with CAT.We performed a post hoc analysis of consecutive CAT patients from October 2008 to December 2019. The primary outcome was the rate of clinically relevant bleeding (CRB), and we compared two periods (1-12 vs. 12-24 months). Hazard ratio (HR), competing risk analysis and sensitivity analyses were performed.Of the 588 patients included, 30.1% (n = 177) received LMWH beyond 12 months. The rate of CRB in the first 12 months compared to the 12-24 month period was 3.2 per 100 patients/month (95% CI 2.5-4.1) vs. 0.9 per 100 patients/month (95% CI 0.4-1.5), (P 0.0001). The competing risk analysis of CRB comparing both periods showed a lower sub-distribution hazard ratio (SHR) during the period 12-24 months (SHR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.8, P 0.001).In patients with cancer-associated thrombosis under anticoagulant treatment with LMWH, the rate of clinically relevant bleeding and major bleeding were lower beyond 12 months.

[Background]: The relationship between cancer and venous thromboembolic disease (VTD) are complex because the activated coagulation factors are not only involved in thrombosis but also in malignant processes, such as angiogenesis and metastasis., [Objective]: To compare phenotypes of extracellular vesicles (EVs), and levels of D-dimer, soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin) and antigenic tissue factor (TF) between unprovoked VTD patients, who did not develop cancer during one-year follow-up, and those with advanced stage of cancer but not associated with VTD., [Methods]: A prospective study in which we included 138 unprovoked VTD patients and 67 advanced cancer patients, who did not develop thrombosis. Levels of EVs of different cellular origin (platelet, endothelium and leukocyte), EVs positive for tissue factor (TF) and P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 were quantified by flow cytometry. D-dimer, soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin) and antigenic TF were determined by ELISA., [Results]: TF-positive EVs, D-dimer, and sP-selectin were markedly elevated in unprovoked VTD patients compared to cancer patients without association with thrombosis., [Conclusions]: Levels of TF-positive EVs, D-dimer and sP-selectin are able to discriminate between unprovoked VTD patients not related to cancer and cancer patients not associated with VTD. These results could lead to the application of EVs as biomarkers of both diseases., This work was supported by research grants from the Plan Nacional de Investigacion Cient ıfica, Desarrollo e Innovacion Tecnologica (Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria [PI11/02308], Red RIC [RD12/0042/ 0029], Junta de Andalucıa [CVI-6654] and by the Fundacion Investigacion Hospital La Fe, Spain.

Objective: The soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator riociguat is approved for the treatment of adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and inoperable or persistent/recurrent chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) following Phase 3 randomized trials. The EXPosurE Registry RiociguaT in patients with pulmonary hypertension (EXPERT) study was designed to monitor the long-term safety of riociguat in clinical practice. Methods: EXPERT was an international, multicenter, prospective, uncontrolled, non-interventional cohort study of patients treated with riociguat. Patients were followed for at least 1 year and up to 4 years from enrollment or until 30 days after stopping riociguat treatment. Primary safety outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms and System Organ Classes version 21.0, collected during routine clinic visits and collated via case report forms. Results: In total, 956 patients with CTEPH were included in the analysis. The most common AEs in these patients were peripheral edema/edema (11.7%), dizziness (7.5%), right ventricular (RV)/cardiac failure (7.7%), and pneumonia (5.0%). The most common SAEs were RV/cardiac failure (7.4%), pneumonia (4.1%), dyspnea (3.6%), and syncope (2.5%). Exposure-adjusted rates of hemoptysis/pulmonary hemorrhage and hypotension were low and comparable to those in the long-term extension study of riociguat (Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Soluble Guanylate Cyclase–Stimulator Trial [CHEST-2]). Conclusion: Data from EXPERT show that in patients with CTEPH, the safety of riociguat in routine practice was consistent with the known safety profile of the drug, and no new safety concerns were identified. © 2020 The Authors Eli Lilly and Company; Pfizer; Bayer; GlaxoSmithKline; Merck; Actelion Pharmaceuticals; Meso Scale Diagnostics; United Therapeutics Corporation; Novartis Pharma; Merck Sharp and Dohme; GlaxoSmithKline Australia; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Grupo Ferrer Internacional, S.A The EXPERT registry was funded by Bayer AG (Berlin, Germany) and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. The authors acknowledge the database administration by Torsten Tille, Dresden, and the project administration of Mrs Romy Hoppenz and Mrs Linda Kottke at GWT-TUD GmbH, Dresden. Medical writing services provided by Richard Murphy PhD of Adelphi Communications Ltd, Macclesfield, UK were funded by Bayer AG in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP3) guidelines. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Prof Marius M. Hoeper reports personal fees from Bayer AG, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Actelion, personal fees from Acceleron, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Jansen, personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. Dr Hans Klose reports speaker and consultancy fees from Actelion, Bayer AG, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics and research support from Actelion, Bayer AG, GSK, Pfizer, and MSD. Dr Michael Halank reports personal fees and non-financial support from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Berlin-Chemie, GSK, OMT, MSD, and Novartis. Dr George Giannakoulas reports speaker and consultancy fees from Actelion, Bayer, ELPEN Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Pfizer, Lilly, and United Therapeutics, and research support from GSK, ELPEN Pharmaceuticals, and Galenica. Dr Henning Gall has received honoraria and/or other support from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, OMT, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. Dr Pavel Jansa reports consultancy and speaker fees from MSD, AOP Orphan, and Actelion. Prof Ekkehard Grünig reports research grants and speaker honoraria/consultancy fees from Actelion and Bayer/MSD, research grants from GSK, United Therapeutics, Bellerophon, OMT GmbH, Pfizer, Reata, and Novartis, and speaker honoraria from Bial, Medscape, and OrPha Swiss GmbH. Prof David Pittrow reports personal fees from Actelion, Bayer AG, Aspen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi, Biogen, Shire, and MSD outside the submitted work. Silvia Ulrich reports research grants and personal fees from Actelion, Bayer, MSD, and Orpha Swiss. Tobias J. Lange has received personal fees from Actelion, MSD, Pfizer, and OMT orphan. Dr Iraklis Tsangaris reports speaker and consultancy fees from Actelion, Bayer AG, ELPEN, GSK, MSD, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. Stephan Rosenkranz reports remunerations for lectures and/or consultancy from Abbott, Actelion, Arena, Bayer, Ferrer, GSK, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics; and research support to his institution from Actelion, Bayer, Novartis, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. Repke J. Snijder reports grants from Pfizer and Actelion Pharmaceuticals. Prof Iveta Šimková reports consultancy and speaker fees from MSD, AOP Orphan, and Actelion. Dr Marc Humbert reports grants and personal fees from Bayer and GSK, and personal fees from Actelion, Merck, and United Therapeutics. Marion Delcroix has received investigator, speaker, consultant, and steering committee member fees from Actelion, Bayer AG, Bellerophon, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Pfizer, and Reata, and research grants from Actelion. Joan A. Barberà reports receipt of honoraria for consultation or speaker fees from Actelion and Merck; and research support through his institution from Actelion, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, and Ferrer. Joanna Pepke-Zaba reports research grants and speaker honoraria/consultancy fees from Actelion, Bayer/MSD, and GSK. Jean-Luc Vachiéry reports ongoing consultancies to Actelion, Sonnivie, Arena Pharma, Bial Portela, and Respira Therapeutics, past consultancies to AstraZeneca, BayerShering, CardioMEMS, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Merck, and United Therapeutics, and current membership of an advisory board or similar group for Actelion and GlaxoSmithKline. Jean-Luc Vachiéry's institution receives funding from Actelion Pharmaceuticals for performing clinical studies. Regina Steringer-Mascherbauer, Jens Klotsche, and Miguel-Angel Gomez Sanchez have no conflicts of interest relevant to the EXPERT study. Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani reports personal fees for advisory board work, and payment for lectures including service on speaker bureaus, from Actelion, Bayer, GSK, Novartis, and Pfizer; consultancy fees from Actelion, Bayer, Bellerophon Pulse Technologies, GSK, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer; and grants from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). Pilar Escribano Subias reports personal fees from Actelion, Bayer AG, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck Sharp & Dohme, and grants from Actelion, Bayer AG, GlaxoSmithKline, and Ferrer, outside the submitted work. Gérald Simonneau reports personal fees and non-financial support from Actelion, personal fees and non-financial support from Bayer, personal fees and non-financial support from MSD, outside the submitted work. Douglas S. Helmersen reports industry-sponsored research with Bayer AG, United Therapeutics, and Gilead Sciences, Inc., and advisory board/speaker fees from Bayer AG and Actelion. David Langleben reports honoraria, consultation fees, research support, and/or travel expenses from Actelion, Arena, Bayer AG, Northern Therapeutics, PhaseBio, Acceleron, Janssen, and United Therapeutics. Anco Boonstra reports consultancy fees from Pfizer BV and hospitality from Teva Nederland. Lisa M. Mielniczuk reports speaker fees and honoraria from Bayer AG, and speaker fees, consultancy fees, and travel fees from Actelion. Evgenia Williams and Christian Meier are employees of Bayer AG.

• Patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis have a high risk of thrombotic and bleeding events.

REHAP investigators., [Introduction] REHAP is a voluntary, observational Spanish registry of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. We analyzed the experience (use and effectiveness) with inhaled iloprost (inh-ILO) in real-life conditions during a 3-year period., [Methods] Patients included were those with PAH ≥14 years recruited during 1998–2016 who had received inh-ILO. Variables were collected at the beginning of treatment (0 ± 3 months) and 12 ± 3/36 ± 6 months follow-up. Effectiveness was assessed in the intent-to-treat population as changes in functional class and/or physical performance and transplant-free survival from the beginning of treatment. Stopping inh-ILO-related survival was also assessed. Subanalyses included treatment strategy (first-line therapy –monotherapy or upfront combination- or sequential therapy) and risk of clinical worsening/death., [Results] Inh-ILO was the most frequently used prostanoid in Spain, rendering 267 patients eligible for analysis. Median age was 54 years; 61% were WHO FC III. Sixty (23%) patients started inh-ILO as monotherapy, 27 (10%) as upfront combination and 180 (67%) sequentially. At 3-year follow-up significant clinical improvements were observed; however, transplant-free survival rate was 54%, being poorer in patients at high risk (63% vs. 85% in low risk patients; P, [Conclusion] Data from the REHAP collected during 3 years shows that inh-ILO has low effectiveness independently of the treatment strategy used, with a 3-year survival rate of 54% despite significant clinical improvements, probably due to the use in high-risk patients. Discontinuation rate was as high as 75%., We express our gratitude to Actelion, Ferrer, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) for supporting the REHAP Registry with an unrestricted educational grant.

Background Optimal duration of anticoagulation for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) remains unclear. This study assessed D-dimer (DD) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels after the withdrawal of anticoagulation treatment to predict the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence among patients with CAT. Methods Prospective, multicentre study to evaluate CAT with ≥3 months of anticoagulation that was subsequently discontinued. Blood samples were taken when patients stopped the anticoagulation and 21 days later to determine the DD and hs-CRP levels. All patients were followed up for 6 months to detect VTE recurrence. Results Between 2013 and 2015, 325 patients were evaluated and 114 patients were ultimately enrolled in the study. The mean age was 62 ± 14 years and nearly 40% had metastasis. Ten patients developed VTE recurrence within 6 months (8.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.3–15.5%). The DD and hs-CRP levels after 21 days were associated with VTE recurrence. The subdistribution hazard ratios were 9.82 for hs-CRP (95% CI: 19–52) and 5.81 for DD (95% CI: 1.1–31.7). Conclusions This study identified that hs-CRP and DD were potential biomarkers of VTE recurrence after discontinuation of anticoagulation in CAT. A risk-adapted strategy could identify low-risk patients who may benefit from discontinuation of anticoagulation.

Introduction The safety and efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) treatment in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) beyond 6 months are unknown. Our aim was to determine the safety of long-term tinzaparin use in patients with CAT. Methods We performed a prospective, open, single arm, multicentre study in patients with CAT receiving treatment with tinzaparin. We evaluated the rate of clinically relevant bleeding events (major and non-major clinically relevant bleeding) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence. Results A total of 247 patients were recruited, with a crude incidence of major bleeding of 4.9% (12/247). The rate of clinically relevant bleeding during months 1–6 and 7–12, was 0.9% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.5 to 1.6%] and 0.6% (95% CI 0.2 to 1.4%) (p = 0.5) per patient and month, respectively. Male gender showed greater risk for clinically relevant bleeding with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.97 (95% CI 1.01 to 8.1; p = 0.02). The incidence of VTE recurrence at months 1–6 and 7–12 was 4.5% (95% CI 2.2 to 7.8%) and 1.1% (95% CI 0.1 to 3.9%), respectively. One patient died due to VTE recurrence and two because of severe bleeding. Conclusions Treatment with tinzaparin beyond 6 months is safe in patients with CAT.

Introduction An association between pulmonary embolism (PE) and a subsequent diagnosis of cancer has been repeatedly reported. Although screening and early detection might play a pivotal part in reducing mortality from cancer, there are currently no definite data to suggest that cancer screening may improve survival rates in patients with PE. We hereby present the results of a screening program and a two-year follow-up survey for detecting occult cancer in this patient population. Materials and methods A total of 107 patients with PE were consecutively enrolled. All subjects underwent an initial screening program followed by a two-year follow-up survey. We calculated the sensitivity of our screening program, and identified risk factors associated with occult cancer by means of logistic regression. Results The initial screening program yielded positive results in five patients (4.7%), and four additional cases were identified during the 2-year follow-up. The overall sensitivity of our screening program in idiopathic PE was 55.5%. In the entire study cohort, the number necessary for screening was 12.1 (6.1 in idiopathic PE, and 58 in secondary PE). Logistic regression analysis revealed that a shock index ≥ 1 (odds ratio: 5.467; p = 0.007) and idiopathic PE (odds ratio: 12.82; p = 0.03) were independent risk factors for occult cancer in our PE patients. Conclusions A simple and noninvasive screening program yields an acceptable sensitivity for detecting occult cancer in idiopathic PE patients. These results highlight the importance of screening for occult cancer in patients diagnosed with PE, especially in idiopathic forms.

Introduction Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated non-inferiority of rivaroxaban compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Our objective was to analyze in real life, tolerance, recurrence, bleeding and adverse events of rivaroxaban in patients with acute symptomatic VTE. Material and Methods Open follow-up study of a cohort of patients aged 18 and over diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) treated with rivaroxaban from December 2011 to January 2014. Results The total number of patients treated with rivaroxaban was 103. The mean age was 58 +/-17 years. The most frequent co-morbidities were: hypertension (30.0%), dyslipidemia (23.3%) and respiratory disease (25.2%). The type of thromboembolic event treated was: DVT (64.1%), PE (18.4%), DVT + PE (17.5%). Of the rivaroxaban-treated patients, 30% did so from the initial anticoagulant therapy and the other 70% in long-term or extended anticoagulant therapy. The median time of treatment with rivaroxaban was 5 months. There was one recurrence and no deaths occurred. Six patients had bleeding, one of which was severe. Conclusions Rivaroxaban provides a therapeutic alternative in a group of patients with VTE with advantages over VKAs, because of the convenience in dosing, lack of requirements for periodic monitoring and limited interaction with other drugs.

The predictive Khorana's model was developed to score the thromboembolic disease risk in cancer patients on chemotherapy and to identify which patients would benefit from thromboprophylaxis. We analized the results and applied the predictive Khorana's model in patients with cancer and who were diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis.Retrospective analysis of prognostic characteristics of Khorana's model in 122 patients based on a prospective analysis.Seventy-nine percent of the total were in the low and intermediate risk category and 21% had high risk according to the Khorana's predictive model. This model had a sensitivity and prognostic precision of 20.8% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 14.6-28.7) and a false negatives proportion of 79.2% (95% CI: 1.3-85.4).Application of this model in our patients would not be enough as the unique tool to identify cancer patients who should receive tromboprophylaxis. The use of both biomarkers and clinical models seems to be the best cost-effective strategy for this purpose. Future, randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled studies are needed for find better treatment strategies in cancer patients.

Objectives: To analyse survival rate after 24 months in consecutive patients with a diagnosis of PE as well as associated factors. Methods: Prospective cohort study during a follow-up period of two years in a series of consecutive patients with PE. Results: During the follow-up period, 34 out of 148 patients died (23%). Factors independently associated with reduced survival rate were: creatinine levels > 2 (OR, 8.8; 95% CI, 1.1 - 70.87), previous neoplasm (OR, 8.8; 95% CI, 3.69 - 20.98), dementia (OR, 6.85; 95% CI, 2.1 - 22.33) and dyslipidemia (OR, 5.07; 95% CI, 1.92 - 13.44). Forty four percent of the patients with dyslipidemia died vs. 20.8% of patients without this condition. Conclusions: In our study dyslipidemia shows as a long-term negative prognostic marker for survival in patients with EP. Resumo: Objetivos: Analisar a taxa de sobrevivência após 24 meses, em pacientes consecutivos com diagnóstico de PE, bem como fatores associados. Métodos: Estudo prospectivo durante um período de seguimento de dois anos em uma série consecutiva de pacientes com PE. Resultados: Durante o período de acompanhamento, 34 dos 148 pacientes morreram (23%). Fatores independentemente associados à reduzida taxa de sobrevivência foram: os níveis de creatinina> 2 (OR, 8,8; 95% CI, 1,1-70,87), neoplasia anterior (OR, 8,8; IC 95%, 3,69-20,98), demência (OR, 6,85; 95% CI, 2,1-22,33) e dislipidemia (OR, 5,07; IC 95%, 1,92-13,44). Quarenta e quatro por cento dos pacientes com dislipidemia morreram contra 20,8% dos pacientes sem essa condição. Conclusões: No nosso estudo, a dislipidemia mostra-se um marcador prognóstico negativo de longo prazo na sobrevida de pacientes com EP. Keywords: Dyslipidemia, Lipid metabolic disorders, Pulmonary embolism, Survival analysis, Venous thromboembolism, Palavras-chave: Dislipidemia, Doenças metabólicas lipídicas, Embolia pulmonar, Análise de sobrevivência, Tromboembolismo venoso