Search

Natural compounds containing fungal β-glucans have been used to improve general health for thousands of years in China and Japan. Lentinan, the backbone of β-(1, 3)-glucan with β-(1, 6) branches, is one of the active ingredients purified from Shiitake mushrooms and has been approved as a biological response modifier for the treatment of gastric cancer in Japan. Despite recent advances in chemotherapeutic agents, unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer remains an incurable disease, with survival rates being far from satisfactory. Recent clinical studies have shown that chemo-immunotherapy using lentinan prolongs the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer, as compared to chemotherapy alone. In addition, trastuzumab, an antibody against HER2/neu growth factor receptor, has been used for the treatment of gastric cancer in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. Lentinan may exert a synergistic action with anti-cancer monoclonal antibodies to activate complement systems through the mechanism of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement dependent cytotoxicity. Because a better understanding of its biological activities should enable us to use lentinan more efficiently in the treatment of gastric cancer, immunological effects provided by β-glucans, a possible mode of action of lentinan, and its clinical application including future potential uses are discussed in the present review.

Background: There have been no well-documented reports detailing the relationship between skeletal metastasis and tumor markers in a large series of patients. The purpose of our study was to assess the relationship between the clinical features of skeletal metastasis and serum tumor markers and to determine whether tumor markers are a useful modality in the differential diagnosis of skeletal metastasis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive 458 patients with skeletal metastasis and divided the patients into two groups according to six clinical presenting factors. We assessed whether these groups influenced the level of the tumor markers in univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Patients with skeletal metastasis of carcinoma had a higher level of markers CEA (P < 0.0001)andCA19-9(P = 0.0008)thanpatientswithprimarybonetumorsandhematological malignancies. Univariate analysis of clinical variables revealed that metastasis on axial skeleton, multiple skeletal metastases and visceral metastasis were associated with the serum CEA and CA19-9 levels. By multivariate analysis, metastasis on axial skeleton, multiple skeletal metastases and visceral metastasis were found to be associated with the serum CEA and CA19-9 levels. At least one of the tumor markers was elevated in 73% of all patients. Conclusions: The higher tumor marker level (CEA, CA19-9) is predictive of metastasis on the axial skeleton, multiple skeletal metastases and visceral metastasis. Tumor markers are useful as a screening test to distinguish skeletal metastases of carcinoma from primary bone tumors or hematological malignancy from primary bone tumor and hematological malignancy.

Prognostic assessment is crucial for the management of AML. Although the use of karyotype analysis for risk-stratification is widely accepted, prognosis of AML remains ambiguous, particularly for patients categorized into the intermediate cytogenetic risk group and additional markers are required for an accurate prediction of outcome. For this study, we used multiplex real-time RT-PCR, which can simultaneously quantify WT1 and 10 distinct fusion gene transcripts, to prospectively evaluate the pre-treatment bone marrow findings of 53 de novo AML patients. Five patients with normal karyotype or insufficient metaphases detected by conventional karyotype analysis proved to have AML1-MTG8, CBFbeta-MYH11 or PML-RARalpha fusion transcripts. WT1 overexpression was observed in 92% of the patients, and the levels were significantly higher in the cytogenetic favorable risk group, especially patients with PML-RARalpha. WT1 levels also correlated with the percentage of blasts in bone marrow, especially in cases of core-binding factor leukemia. There was no association between initial WT1 levels and outcome in terms of event-free survival or overall survival. These results suggest that multiplex real-time RT-PCR is rapid and useful for the precise cytogenetic stratification of AML, and that WT1 levels at presentation correlate with several biologic features of leukemia, but have no prognostic significance.

CCND1, FGFR3 and c-MAF mRNA expression of tumor samples from 123 multiple myeloma patients were analyzed by global RQ/RT-PCR. CCND1, FGFR3 and c-MAF were positive in 44 (36%), 28 (23%) and 16 (13%) of patients, respectively. In 7 patients, both FGFR3 and c-MAF were positive. The expression of c-MAF was independent unfavorable prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Autologous stem cell transplantation improved progression-free survival of CCND1-positive patients. Bortezomib, thalidomide or lenalidomide extended OS of FGFR3 and/or c-MAF-positive patients. Thus, CCND1, FGFR3 and c-MAF mRNA expression can predict survival and is useful for planning stratified treatment strategies for myeloma patients.

Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is performed as curative therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In most patients, BMT is performed at the time of remission which implies that the number of leukemic cells is less than 5% of all hematopoietic cells, namely, 0 to 10(10) leukemia cells in the body. Thus, some patients may well undergo BMT despite the fact that no leukemic cells are left in the body. In this respect, more accurate diagnosis of complete remission status would be to the patients' benefit. To detect minimal residual disease (MRD) not found by light-microscopy, further strategies are required after achieving hematological remission. Cytogenetic methods, Southern blot analysis and conventional immunological techniques can all provide accurate diagnosis, however, the sensitivity of these techniques for the detection of MRD is just as low as that of the light microscopy. Recently, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has become available for the detection of low levels of chimeric bcr-abl transcripts in Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph1) ALL patients. With this assay, investigators have reported MRD in patients after chemotherapy or BMT. Most patients who achieve hematological remission after conventional chemotherapy still have bcr-abl transcript detectable by PCR, confirming the general concept that this particular leukemia needs BMT in order to cure the disease. Some patients who had MRD prior to BMT continued disease free survival > 1 year after BMT with a negative PCR result and in these patients, MRD seems to have been eradicated by the BMT procedure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

We prospectively analyzed the adverse effects and outcomes of 15 patients with stage IV gastric cancer who underwent palliative gastrectomy from December, 2002 to May, 2008 and subsequently received combination therapy of S-1 and 4-h infusion of cisplatin. The National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria (version 3. 0) were applied to evaluate the adverse effects of this therapy, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot the survival curve. The side effects most frequently observed were anorexia (grade 3; 33%), although one case of grade 4 who was easily fatigued was noted during the first course and could not receive further courses of this therapy. The 2-year survival rate was 33% and median survival time was 31 months. It has been suggested that 24-h infusion of cisplatin combined with oral S-1 after reduction surgery might improve survival in patients with stage IV gastric cancer.

From July, 2007 to June, 2008, we prospectively investigated the influence of Hange-shashin-to on the therapeutic and adverse effects of chemotherapy and the changes in quality of life(QOL)scores of the patients with metastatic gastric and colorectal cancer. Twenty patients receiving S-1/Irinotecan (CPT-11) therapy were randomly allocated into group A (with Hange-shashin-to) and B (without Hange-shashin-to). While the anti-tumor effects did not differ significantly between these two groups, severe side effects of more than grade 3 occurred less frequently in group A. Our results suggested that the decrease in QOL scores on day 15 might be alleviated in group A, compared to group B. Therefore, Hange-shashin-to can be one of the useful supportive medicines in the combination therapy of S-1/CPT- 11.

Two unresectable advanced gastric cancer cases with peritoneal metastases were successfully treated by the combination therapy of S-1 and paclitaxel. S-1 (1.25m(2): 80 mg/day, 1.25m(2)-1.50m(2):120 mg/day) was administered orally for 14 consecutive days followed by 14 days rest and a 2-hour infusion of paclitaxel (50 mg/m(2)) was administered on day 1 and 15 of each course. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks unless disease progression or severe adverse effects were observed. Case 1: 65-year-old male (performance status: PS 3) with type 1 gastric cancer with malignant ascites. Case 2: 66-year-old male (PS3) with peritoneal metastases whose primary gastric lesion was surgically resected. Partial response was obtained in the former and complete response in the latter. Combination therapy of S-1 and paclitaxel can be highly recommended for patients with inoperable gastric cancer with poor PS.

We report on two patients, successfully treated by the combination therapy of S-1 and 24-h infusion of cisplatin (CDDP), who were initially diagnosed with unresectable stage 4 advanced gastric cancer. Each patient had a very good clinical response and underwent curative gastrectomy after completion of 14 and 10 courses of S-1/CDDP chemotherapy, respectively. A microscopically detailed examination of surgically obtained specimens showed the complete disappearance of malignant cells in the two cases. S-1/CDDP combination therapy can, therefore, be highly active in incurable advanced gastric carcinoma.

A 67-year-old man with multiple liver metastases of colonic cancer was treated with combination therapy of S-1 and irinotecan (CPT-11): S-1 (120 mg/day) administered orally for 14 consecutive days followed by 14 days rest. CPT-11 (100 mg/m(2)) was given as a 2-hour infusion on day 1 and 15. The patient complained of high fever and subsequent exertional dyspnea in the middle of the second course of S-1/CPT-11 therapy. He was hospitalized with severe hypoxemia. CT scan showed extensive ground glass and consolidative changes in bilateral lungs. Steroid pulse therapy with oxygen therapy remarkably improved his symptoms, and abnormal findings on CT scan also resolved. Drug-induced pneumonia needs to be considered in the differential diagnosis when patients treated with S-1/CPT-11 combination therapy present high fever and dyspnea.

A 56-year-old woman with multiple lung metastases and lymphangiosis carcinomatosa due to recurrent rectal cancer was treated with chemotherapy of modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) regimen: l-leucovorin (l-LV 200 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (L-OHP 85 mg/m(2)) were given as a 2-hour infusion followed by bolus injection of 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) and a 46- hour infusion 5-FU 2,400 mg/m(2) every two weeks. Since partial response was achieved and dyspnea was remarkably improved, she was discharged without oxygen therapy after 5 courses.

Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) has been established as a key drug for advanced colorectal cancer, and combination therapy with 5-FU/Leucovorin (LV)(FOLFOX regimen) is commonly used in Europe and the US. A phase I study of modified (m) FOLFOX 6 therapy was conducted to determine the recommended dose (RD) of 5-FU infused for 46 hours. Inclusion criteria were unresectable advanced colorectal cancer,measurable lesions, performance status (PS; ECOG) 0-2, age 20-75 years, and adequate organ functions. L-OHP and l-LV was administered over 2 hours and followed by bolus injection and continuous infusion of 5-FU for 46 hours every 2 weeks. Two cycles of mFOLFOX 6 therapy were performed. Doses of L-OHP, l-LV, and bolus injection of 5-FU were fixed at 85 mg/m(2), 200 mg/m(2), and 400 mg/m(2), respectively. The dose of continuous infused 5-FU was escalated from 1,600 mg/m(2), (level 1), 2,000 mg/m(2), (level 2), 2,400 mg/m(2), (level 3), and 2,800 mg/m(2), (level 4). RD was determined in a dose escalation manner, and safety was evaluated according to NCI-CTC Ver 2.0. A total of 13 patients were enrolled. Male/female=7/6, PS 0/1/2=2/4/7, mean age 64 years (range 55-75). Thrombocytopenia was not observed, and grade 2 of neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy was observed in 4 and 6 out of 13 patients. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed at level 1 (n=3), 2 (n=4), and 3 (n=4), but at level 4 (n=2), 2 patients experienced DLT; grade 3 easy fatigue and anorexia required treatment delay over 7 days. Level 3 was therefore determined as RD. A phase II study is ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of mFOLFOX 6 therapy.

Three cases with unresectable advanced gastric cancer with liver metastases were successfully treated by the combination therapy of TS-1 and cisplatin( CDDP). TS-1 (1.25 m2: 80 mg/day, 1.25 m2-1.50 m2: 100 mg/day,or =1.50 m2: 120 mg/day) was administered orally for 14 consecutive days followed by 14 days rest,and a 24-h infusion of CDDP (70 mg/m2) was administered on day 8 of each course. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks unless disease progression was observed. Partial response was obtained in all of the following three advanced gastric cancer cases with liver metastases. Case 1: 67-year-old male with Borrmann type I gastric cancer with multiple liver metastases. Case 2: 55-year-old female with multiple liver and lymph node metastases whose primary gastric lesion was surgically resected. Case 3: 53-year-old-male with Borrmann type III gastric cancer with liver and lymph node metastases. TS-1/CDDP therapy can be highly recommended for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer with liver metastases.