Search

Background In women with clinically node-negative breast cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsy is the first step in axillary staging. A randomized trial published in 2013 concluded that patients with sentinel lymph node micrometastases (N1mi) do not benefit from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). We hypothesized that disparities exist in management of the axilla in node-negative patients. Methods We included women aged >40 years with nonmetastatic, clinically node-negative breast cancer from 2014 to 2016 in the National Cancer Database. Women treated neoadjuvantly, with large tumors (cT4), or no tumor (cT0) were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression identified patient and facility characteristics associated with undergoing ALND as first axillary surgery and completion ALND in the setting of N1mi disease. Results Of 273,951 patients, 22,898 (8%) underwent ALND first. These patients were more likely to be Hispanic (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.32), have Medicare (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.24), be uninsured (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.53), have lower educational attainment (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.32), be treated at a community hospital (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.52, 1.74), or reside in the South (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.26). In the sentinel lymph node biopsy first group, 8,882 (4%) were classified as N1mi and 1,872 (21%) underwent subsequent ALND. These patients were more likely to be Hispanic (OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.42) and have the lowest income (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.15, 2.27). Conclusion Disparities persist in implementation of evidence-based management of the axilla in women with clinically node-negative breast cancer.

Introduction A 2014 consensus statement from the Society of Surgical Oncology and American Society for Radiation Oncology supported “no ink on tumor” as an adequate margin for breast conserving therapy (BCT). This study evaluates this statement in a multi-institution cohort. Methods A retrospective review of BCT cases at 3 comprehensive cancer centers was performed. Women age >18 receiving BCT for T1-2 breast cancer from 2008-2012 were included. Pre-2014, all sites considered 2 mm adequate. Estimated re-excision rates using the 2014 guidelines were calculated and factors predictive of re-excision were analyzed. Results 542 patients (545 lumpectomies) were eligible. Using a ≥2 mm margin standard, 32.8% of patients underwent re-excision compared to 14.1% after 2014 (p < 0.0001). Tumor size (p= 0.003), grade (p=0.015), and lymphovascular invasion (p=0.021) were predictive of re-excision. Patients with additional intraoperative margins excised were less likely to require reoperation (p=0.002). Local recurrence was unaffected by re-excision after mean followup of 66 months. Conclusions The 2014 margin guidelines markedly reduce re-excision rates. There is no difference in local recurrence for patients after re-excision for a close margin versus without Powered., Highlights • Multi-institution review 2014 consensus statement on margins for invasive breast cancer. • Pooled results demonstrated a 32.8% re-excision rate reduced to 14.1% if the "no tumor on ink" guidelines were applied. • No difference in local recurrence rates, including patients with close margins, after median followup of 67 months.

While a "fourth peak" of delayed trauma mortality has been described, limited data describe the causes of death (CODs) for patients in the years following an injury. This study investigates the difference in COD statewide for patients with and without a recent trauma admission.This retrospective cohort study compared COD for trauma and nontrauma patients in North Carolina. Death certificates in NC's death registry were matched with the NC trauma registry between January 2013 and December 2018 using matching on name and date of birth. Patients who died during the index trauma admission were excluded. Underlying COD recorded on the death certificate were used for the primary analysis.Of 481,415 death records, 19,083 (4.0%) were linked to an alive discharge within the trauma registry during the study period. Prior trauma patients (PTPs) had a higher incidence of mental illness (9.2 vs. 6.1%), Alzheimer's (6.1% vs. 4.2%), and opioid-related (1.8% vs. 1.6%) COD compared to nontrauma patients, p0.05. Overall, suicide was higher in the nontrauma cohort (1.5% vs. 1.1%); however, PTP had higher incidences of death by motor vehicle collision and other injury (6.0% vs. 3.8%) and homicide (0.9% vs. 0.6%), p0.001. Prior trauma patients had 1.16 increased odds of an opioid-related death (p = 0.009; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.29) compared with those without prior trauma. Younger PTP had a much higher rate of death from suicide (12.0%) compared with those 41 to 65 years (2.8%) and older than 65 years (0.2%; p0.001). Discharge to skilled nursing facility (odds ratio, 1.87; p0.05) and severe injury (odds ratio, 1.93; p0.05) were associated with early death after discharge (≤90 days).After hospital discharge, PTPs remain at risk of dying from future trauma and opioid-related conditions. Prevention strategies for PTP should address the increased risk of death from a subsequent traumatic injury and the at-risk populations for early death after discharge.Prognostic and Epidemiologic, Level IV.