1. Impacts of signal processing factors on perceptual restoration in cochlear-implant users
- Author
-
Brittany N. Jaekel, Sarah Weinstein, Rochelle S. Newman, and Matthew J. Goupell
- Subjects
Cochlear Implants ,Acoustics and Ultrasonics ,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) ,Acoustic Stimulation ,Speech Intelligibility ,Speech Perception ,Humans ,Psychological and Physiological Acoustics ,Cochlear Implantation ,Illusions - Abstract
Cochlear-implant (CI) users have previously demonstrated perceptual restoration, or successful repair of noise-interrupted speech, using the interrupted sentences paradigm [Bhargava, Gaudrain, and Başkent (2014). “Top-down restoration of speech in cochlear-implant users,” Hear. Res. 309, 113–123]. The perceptual restoration effect was defined experimentally as higher speech understanding scores with noise-burst interrupted sentences compared to silent-gap interrupted sentences. For the perceptual restoration illusion to occur, it is often necessary for the masking or interrupting noise bursts to have a higher intensity than the adjacent speech signal to be perceived as a plausible masker. Thus, signal processing factors like noise reduction algorithms and automatic gain control could have a negative impact on speech repair in this population. Surprisingly, evidence that participants with cochlear implants experienced the perceptual restoration illusion was not observed across the two planned experiments. A separate experiment, which aimed to provide a close replication of previous work on perceptual restoration in CI users, also found no consistent evidence of perceptual restoration, contrasting the original study's previously reported findings. Typical speech repair of interrupted sentences was not observed in the present work's sample of CI users, and signal-processing factors did not appear to affect speech repair.
- Published
- 2023