1. Predicting Parkinson's disease trajectory using clinical and neuroimaging baseline measures
- Author
-
Fang Frank Yu, Albert Montillo, Richard B. Dewey, Kevin P. Nguyen, Rathan M. Subramaniam, Vyom Raval, Marco C. Pinho, Cooper Mellema, and Alex Treacher
- Subjects
Male ,0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Parkinson's disease ,Disease ,Severity of Illness Index ,Article ,Machine Learning ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,Neuroimaging ,Rating scale ,Cerebellum ,Humans ,Medicine ,Baseline (configuration management) ,Aged ,Cerebral Cortex ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Functional Neuroimaging ,Amplitude of low frequency fluctuations ,Default Mode Network ,Reproducibility of Results ,Parkinson Disease ,Middle Aged ,Prognosis ,medicine.disease ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,030104 developmental biology ,Neurology ,Disease Progression ,Biomarker (medicine) ,Female ,Neurology (clinical) ,Nerve Net ,Geriatrics and Gerontology ,business ,Functional magnetic resonance imaging ,Biomarkers ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Predictive biomarkers of Parkinson’s Disease progression are needed to expedite neuroprotective treatment development and facilitate prognoses for patients. This work uses measures derived from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging, including regional homogeneity (ReHo) and fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuations (fALFF), to predict an individual’s current and future severity over up to 4 years and to elucidate the most prognostic brain regions. METHODS: ReHo and fALFF are measured for 82 Parkinson’s Disease subjects and used to train machine learning predictors of baseline clinical and future severity at 1 year, 2 years, and 4 years follow-up as measured by the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). Predictive performance is measured with nested cross-validation, validated on an external dataset, and again validated through leave-one-site-out cross-validation. Important predictive features are identified. RESULTS: The models explain up to 30.4% of the variance in current MDS-UPDRS scores, 55.8% of the variance in year 1 scores, and 47.1% of the variance in year 2 scores (p < 0.0001). For distinguishing high and low-severity individuals at each timepoint (MDS-UPDRS score above or below the median, respectively), the models achieve positive predictive values up to 79% and negative predictive values up to 80%. Higher ReHo and fALFF in several regions, including components of the default motor network, predicted lower severity across current and future timepoints. CONCLUSION: These results identify an accurate prognostic neuroimaging biomarker which may be used to better inform enrollment in trials of neuroprotective treatments and enable physicians to counsel their patients.
- Published
- 2021