1. Are two-person checks more effective than one-person checks for safety critical tasks in high-consequence industries outside of healthcare? A systematic review
- Author
-
Johanna Westbrook, Ryan McMullan, Rachel Urwin, and Mark Wiggins
- Subjects
Safety Management ,Humans ,Industry ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,Human Factors and Ergonomics ,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality ,Engineering (miscellaneous) - Abstract
Double-checking has been used in high-consequence industries for decades. We aimed to determine the strength of the evidence-base regarding the effectiveness of double-checking which underpins its widespread adoption. We searched for quantitative studies of the effectiveness of two-person checking in industry sectors, excluding healthcare. We performed a systematic literature search across six databases and hand-searched key journals. We completed a narrative synthesis and quality assessment of the nine studies identified. Most studies were of fair quality. Two examined the use of two-person checks in aviation, three investigated tasks in chemical manufacturing, and four studies in psychology involved proofreading and visual search tasks. All studies found that the performance of two-people checking was not superior to that of one-person in detecting errors. Further research to compare the effectiveness of different checking processes along with factors which may support optimisation of safety checks in high-consequence industries is required.
- Published
- 2022