Search

Revertant mosaicism (RM) is a phenomenon in which inherited mutations are spontaneously corrected in somatic cells. RM occurs in some congenital skin diseases, but genetic validation of RM in clinically revertant skin has been challenging, especially when homologous recombination (HR) is responsible for RM. Here, we introduce nanopore Cas9-targeted sequencing (nCATS) for identifying HR in clinically revertant skin. We took advantage of compound heterozygous COL7A1 mutations in a patient with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa who showed revertant skin spots. Cas9-mediated enrichment of genomic DNA (gDNA) covering the two mutation sites (>8 kb) in COL7A1 and subsequent MinION sequencing successfully detected intragenic crossover in the epidermis of the clinically revertant skin. This method enables the discernment of haplotypes of up to a few tens of kilobases of gDNA. Moreover, it is devoid of polymerase chain reaction amplification, which can technically induce recombination. We, therefore, propose that nCATS is a powerful tool for understanding complicated gene modifications, including RM.

Revertant (somatic) mosaicism is a spontaneous correction of a causative mutation in patients with congenital diseases. A relatively frequent event, revertant mosaicism may bring favorable outcomes that ameliorate disorders, and is therefore called “natural gene therapy.” However, it has been revealed recently that “overcorrection” of inherited bone marrow failure in patients with sterile alpha motif domain containing 9 (SAMD9)/9L syndromes by revertant mosaicism induces myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with monosomy 7 that occasionally proceeds to acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). In this review, we interpret very complex mechanisms underlying MDS/AML in patients with SAMD9/9L syndromes. This includes multiple myeloid tumor suppressors on the long arm of chromosome 7, all of which act in a haploinsufficient fashion, and a difference in sensitivity to interferon between cells carrying a mutation and revertants. Overcorrection of mutants by somatic mosaicism is likely a novel mechanism in carcinogenesis., A scheme of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) carrying ‐7/del(7q). In patients with SAMD9/9L syndromes, bone marrow cells with SAMD9/9L+/− (revertants) show a high sensitivity to growth factors and a low sensitivity to (the suppressive effects of) interferon (IFN). In addition, surrounding bone marrow cells (SAMD9/9L+/mut) have a high sensitivity to IFN. As a result, the rapid expansion of a ‐7/del(7q) clone causes an “overcorrection,” leading to MDS. This mechanism would be partially applied to sporadic MDS patients with ‐7/del(7q) in old age.

Primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) is a potentially life‐threatening condition that requires urgent diagnosis and treatment. Whilst the most common causes are congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) in childhood and autoimmune adrenal insufficiency in adolescence and adulthood, more than 30 other physical and genetics cause of PAI have been reported. Reaching a specific diagnosis can have implications for management and for monitoring associated features, as well as for counselling families about recurrence risk in siblings and relatives. Here, we describe some recent insights into the genetics of adrenal insufficiency and associated molecular mechanisms. We discuss (a) the role of the nuclear receptors DAX‐1 (NR0B1) and steroidogenic factor‐1 (SF‐1, NR5A1) in human adrenal and reproductive dysfunction; (b) multisystem growth restriction syndromes due to gain‐of‐function in the growth repressors CDKN1C (IMAGE syndrome) and SAMD9 (MIRAGE syndrome), or loss of POLE1; (c) nonclassic forms of STAR and P450scc/CYP11A1 insufficiency that present with a delayed‐onset adrenal phenotype and represent a surprisingly prevalent cause of undiagnosed PAI; and (d) a new sphingolipidosis causing PAI due to defects in sphingosine‐1‐phosphate lyase‐1 (SGPL1). Reaching a specific diagnosis can have life‐long implications for management. In some situations, milder or nonclassic forms of these conditions can first present in adulthood and may have been labelled, “Addison's disease.”

Background: Several new genes and clinical subtypes have been identified since the publication in 2014 of the report of the last International Consensus Meeting on Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB). Objectives: We sought to reclassify disorders with skin fragility, with a focus on EB, based on new clinical and molecular data. Methods: This was a consensus expert review. Results: In this latest consensus report, we introduce the concept of genetic disorders with skin fragility, of which classical EB represents the prototype. Other disorders with skin fragility, where blisters are a minor part of the clinical picture or are not seen because skin cleavage is very superficial, are classified as separate categories. These include peeling skin disorders, erosive disorders, hyperkeratotic disorders, and connective tissue disorders with skin fragility. Because of the common manifestation of skin fragility, these ‘EB-related’ disorders should be considered under the EB umbrella in terms of medical and socioeconomic provision of care. Conclusions: The proposed classification scheme should be of value both to clinicians and researchers, emphasizing both clinical and genetic features of EB. What is already known about this topic?. Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of genetic disorders with skin blistering. The last updated recommendations on diagnosis and classification were published in 2014. What does this study add?. We introduce the concept of genetic disorders with skin fragility, of which classical EB represents the prototype. Clinical and genetic aspects, genotype–phenotype correlations, disease-modifying factors and natural history of EB are reviewed. Other disorders with skin fragility, e.g. peeling skin disorders, erosive disorders, hyperkeratotic disorders, and connective tissue disorders with skin fragility are classified as separate categories; these ‘EB-related’ disorders should be considered under the EB umbrella in terms of medical and socioeconomic provision of care. Linked Comment: Pope. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:603.

Background Fanconi anemia (FA) is a rare disorder characterized by congenital malformations, progressive bone marrow failure, and predisposition to cancer. Patients harboring X‐linked FANCB pathogenic variants usually present with severe congenital malformations resembling VACTERL syndrome with hydrocephalus. Methods We employed the diepoxybutane (DEB) test for FA diagnosis, arrayCGH for detection of duplication, targeted capture and next‐gen sequencing for defining the duplication breakpoint, PacBio sequencing of full‐length FANCB aberrant transcript, FANCD2 ubiquitination and foci formation assays for the evaluation of FANCB protein function by viral transduction of FANCB‐null cells with lentiviral FANCB WT and mutant expression constructs, and droplet digital PCR for quantitation of the duplication in the genomic DNA and cDNA. Results We describe here an FA‐B patient with a mild phenotype. The DEB diagnostic test for FA revealed somatic mosaicism. We identified a 9154 bp intragenic duplication in FANCB, covering the first coding exon 3 and the flanking regions. A four bp homology (GTAG) present at both ends of the breakpoint is consistent with microhomology‐mediated duplication mechanism. The duplicated allele gives rise to an aberrant transcript containing exon 3 duplication, predicted to introduce a stop codon in FANCB protein (p.A319*). Duplication levels in the peripheral blood DNA declined from 93% to 7.9% in the span of eleven years. Moreover, the patient fibroblasts have shown 8% of wild‐type (WT) allele and his carrier mother showed higher than expected levels of WT allele (79% vs. 50%) in peripheral blood, suggesting that the duplication was highly unstable. Conclusion Unlike sequence point variants, intragenic duplications are difficult to precisely define, accurately quantify, and may be very unstable, challenging the proper diagnosis. The reversion of genomic duplication to the WT allele results in somatic mosaicism and may explain the relatively milder phenotype displayed by the FA‐B patient described here.

Background: The current classification of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) comprises two major subtypes: 'severe generalized RDEB'(RDEB-sev gen) with early-onset, extensive, generalized blistering and scarring, complete absence of type VII Collagen, and bi-allelic COL7A1 null mutations; milder 'generalized other RDEB' (RDEB-O) with reduced-to-normal type VII Collagen expression, and non-null genotypes.Objective: To search for previously unrecognized phenotype-genotype correlations in 33 Dutch RDEB families.Methods: We analyzed extensive clinical follow-up data, available for all patients up to 19 years, detailed type VII Collagen immunostaining and genotypes, and correlated clinical phenotype to molecular phenotype and genotype.Results: We identified 20 novel COL7A1 mutations. In 14 of 15 RDEB-sev gen patients type VII Collagen was completely absent, one had strongly reduced type VII Collagen, and all carried bi-allelic null mutations. Five of 11 RDEB-O patients developed pseudosyndactyly of the fingers preceded by skin atrophy and flexion contractures later in childhood and adolescence. All five had esophageal involvement and growth retardation. Type VII collagen immunostaining ranged from strongly reduced to slightly reduced in RDEB-O patients with pseudosyndactyly, whereas RDEB-O patients without pseudosyndactyly had slightly reduced to normal type VII Collagen staining. There was no difference in genotypes between both groups, although we unexpectedly found bi-allelic null mutations in two of five RDEB-O patients with pseudosyndactyly.Conclusion: Pseudosyndactyly occurs in approximately half of RDEB-O patients when type VII Collagen is strongly reduced. The prognosis in RDEB cannot always be simply predicted from the COL7A1 genotype. (C) 2009 Japanese Society for Investigative Dermatology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

BackgroundReplacing mutant skin in epidermolysis bullosa (EB) by epithelial sheets of transduced autologous keratinocytes is the essential surgical step of ex vivo gene therapy. The same applies for revertant cell therapy in which epithelial sheets of revertant autologous keratinocytes are used. Revertant cells can be found in patches of normal skin in patients with junctional EB (JEB) due to revertant mosaicism caused by in vivo reversions.ObjectivesTo develop a technique of adhesive tape stripping as a method for epidermis removal to prepare the acceptor site for revertant cell therapy in a patient with revertant mosaic JEB.MethodsWe performed revertant cell therapy on a patient with mosaic type XVII collagen-deficient non-Herlitz JEB. Skin biopsies were taken from revertant skin on the wrist. Graft production took place on a 3T3-J2 feeder layer resulting in two 6 x 7 cm grafts. An innovative method that uses the pathological plane of least resistance of JEB skin was developed to prepare the acceptor site. A polyacrylate adhesive plaster was placed on the skin and then pulled off with the epidermis.ResultsThe epidermis was easily removed with the plaster. The skin separated at the level of the lamina lucida, leaving a bloodless wound bed of naked lamina densa. Transplantation was successful; the acceptor site healed without scarring. However, blistering could be provoked. The functional repair was not achieved due to the low percentage of revertant cells in the graft.ConclusionsWe conclude that adhesive stripping is a simple, effective and almost painless procedure for removing epidermis for ex vivo cell therapy in EB.

Background Mutations in the gene COL17A1 coding for type XVII collagen cause non-Herlitz junctional epidermolysis bullosa (nH-JEB).Objectives Here we give an overview of the genotype-phenotype correlation in 12 patients from the Netherlands with type XVII collagen-deficient nH-JEB.Patient and methods Family and personal history and clinical presentation were recorded from each patient, and skin biopsies of intact and bullous skin were taken for immunofluorescence and electron microscopy. The mutations were identified by analysing the patient's DNA isolated from peripheral blood cells.Results DNA analysis identified five novel deletions: 1284delA, 1365delC, 3236delT, 3600-3601delCT and 4425delT. Interestingly, we identified a new patient, homozygous for 4425delT, with an exceptionally mild blistering phenotype. All together, three patients had more localized blistering confined to hands, lower legs and face, absent or very mild nail dystrophy, normal primary hair and sparse secondary hair. Nine patients had generalized blistering, nail dystrophy, sparse primary and absent secondary hair. All 12 patients had amelogenesis imperfecta (enamel pitting). Immunofluorescence (IF) antigen mapping with monoclonal antibodies 1A8C and 1D1 that bind to type XVII collagen, but not to its 97-kDa fragment was completely negative in patients with generalized blistering, whereas reduced in patients with localized blistering.Conclusions Our data reveal that in patients with COL17A1 mutations a localized nH-JEB phenotype can be differentiated from a generalized nH-JEB phenotype by IF antigen mapping. The data are important for genetic counselling at early age when the clinical phenotype is not yet clear.

Item does not contain fulltext Revertant mosaicism has been reported in several inherited diseases, including the genetic skin fragility disorder epidermolysis bullosa (EB). Here, we describe the largest cohort of seven patients with revertant mosaicism and dystrophic EB (DEB), associated with mutations in the COL7A1 gene, and determine the underlying molecular mechanisms. We show that revertant mosaicism occurs both in autosomal dominantly and recessively inherited DEB. We found that null mutations resulting in complete loss of collagen VII and severe disease, as well as missense or splice-site mutations associated with some preserved collagen VII function and a milder phenotype, were corrected by revertant mosaicism. The mutation, subtype, and severity of the disease are thus not decisive for the presence of revertant mosaicism. Although collagen VII is synthesized and secreted by both keratinocytes and fibroblasts, evidence for reversion was only found in keratinocytes. The reversion mechanisms included back mutations/mitotic recombinations in 70% of the cases and second-site mutations affecting splicing in 30%. We conclude that revertant mosaicism is more common than previously assumed in patients with DEB, and our findings will have implications for future therapeutic strategies using the patient's naturally corrected cells as a source for cell-based therapies.

Mutations in the type XVII collagen gene (COL17A1) result in the blistering disorder non-Herlitz junctional epidermolysis bullosa (JEB-nH). The incidence of revertant mosaicism, also called "natural gene therapy", was identified in a cohort of 14 patients with JEB-nH caused by COL17A1 mutations in the Netherlands. Five different in vivo reversions, all correcting the germ-line COL17A1 mutation c.2237delG in exon 30, were found in four mosaic JEB-nH patients. The correcting DNA changes involved a wide variety of somatic mutations, from which an indel mutation (c.2228-101_2263 + 70delins15) and a large deletion of 2,165 base pairs (c.2227 + 153_2336-318del) have not been previously observed in patients with revertant mosaicism. Our results show that there is no preference for a repair mechanism. Moreover, revertant mosaicism was confirmed on a DNA level in 6 out of 10 generalized JEB-nH patients. Further, photo-material and clinical history of the other four generalized JEB-nH patients demonstrated that each patient has revertant skin patches. In contrast, revertant mosaicism was not detected in the four localized JEB-nH patients. The fact that so many, if not all, generalized JEB-nH COL17A1 patients have revertant patches offers opportunities for cell therapies in which the patient's own naturally corrected cells are used as a source.

Background: Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa is a genetic blistering disorder caused by mutations in the type VII collagen gene, COL7A1. In revertant mosaicism, germline mutations are corrected by somatic events resulting in a mosaic disease distribution. This "natural gene therapy" phenomenon long has been recognized in other forms of epidermolysis bullosa but only recently in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.Observations: We describe a 21-year-old man with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa carrying the homozygous c.6508C>T (p.Gln2170X) nonsense mutation who reported an unaffected skin patch on his neck where blisters never had occurred. Immunofluorescent type VII collagen staining was normal in 80% of the unaffected skin biopsy; however, it was strongly reduced in the affected skin. In the unaffected skin, the somatic nucleotide substitution c.6510G>T reverted line nonsense codon to tyrosine (p.Gln21.70Tyr), thereby restoring functional protein production.Conclusions: Revertant mosaicism is considered rare in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. However, it might be more common than previously anticipated because our patient is the third in whom revertant mosaicism was identified in a short period of time. The correction mechanism is different than that previously reported. Systematic examination of patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, therefore, will likely reveal more patients with revertant patches. This is important because the natural gene therapy phenomenon may provide opportunities for revertant cell therapy.