1. Long‐term efficacy and safety of adjunctive ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall during catheter ablation for nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation
- Author
-
Cheng I. Wu, Jo Nan Liao, Yun Yu Chen, Li Wei Lo, Shih Lin Chang, Ting Yung Chang, Yu Feng Hu, Fa Po Chung, Ting Chung Huang, Yenn Jiang Lin, Tze Fan Chao, Simon Salim, Ta Chuan Tuan, Chih Min Liu, Chin Yu Lin, Quang Minh Hoang, Ling Kuo, Jennifer Jeanne B. Vicera, Shih Ann Chen, and Chieh Mao Chuang
- Subjects
Ablation Techniques ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Action Potentials ,Catheter ablation ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Risk Assessment ,Disease-Free Survival ,Pulmonary vein ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Refractory ,Heart Rate ,Recurrence ,Risk Factors ,Physiology (medical) ,Internal medicine ,Atrial Fibrillation ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Vein ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Ethanol ,business.industry ,Hazard ratio ,Atrial fibrillation ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Ablation ,Coronary Vessels ,Confidence interval ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Cardiology ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
Introduction We aimed to clarify the effect of vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion for treating VOM triggers and/or mitral flutter after first-attempt endocardial ablation in patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and results Of the 254 consecutive patients (age, 56 ± 10 years; 221 male) undergoing catheter ablation for drug-refractory nonparoxysmal AF, 32 (12.6%) received VOM ethanol infusion. The patients were stratified into group 1 (pulmonary vein isolation [PVI], substrate modification, VOM ethanol infusion), group 2 (PVI, substrate modification), and group 3 (PVI alone). Propensity-matched analysis (N = 128) of long-term outcomes (3.9 ± 0.5 years) revealed a higher AF recurrence risk in group 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 4.17; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.63-10.69; P = .003) and group 3 (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.09-3.04; P = .021) than in group 1, as well as a higher atrial arrhythmia recurrence risk in group 2 than in group 1 (HR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.16-5.03; P = .018). A higher procedural termination rate was observed in group 1 than groups 2 and 3 (41.7% vs 17.2% vs 18.8%; P = .042). On multivariate analysis, VOM ethanol injection was an independent predictor of freedom from recurrence of AF (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.08-0.52; P = .001) and atrial arrhythmia (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.74; P = .005), whereas a left atrial diameter >45 mm and hypertension were independent risk factors for recurrence. Periprocedural complications rates were comparable among the groups. Conclusion Adjunctive VOM ethanol infusion is effective and safe for treating nonparoxysmal AF in patients with VOM triggers and/or refractory mitral flutter, providing good long-term freedom from AF and atrial arrhythmia.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF