Search

Several organ allocation protocols give priority to wait-listed simultaneous kidney-pancreas (SPK) transplant recipients to mitigate the higher cardiovascular risk of patients with diabetes mellitus on dialysis. The available information regarding the impact of preemptive simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation on recipient and graft outcomes is nonetheless controversial. To help resolve this, we explored the influence of preemptive simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplants on patient and graft survival through a retrospective analysis of the OPTN/UNOS database, encompassing 9690 simultaneous transplant recipients between 2000 and 2017. Statistical analysis was performed applying a propensity score analysis to minimize bias. Of these patients, 1796 (19%) were transplanted preemptively. At ten years, recipient survival was significantly superior in the preemptive group when compared to the non-preemptive group (78.9% vs 71.8%). Dialysis at simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation was an independent significant risk for patient survival (hazard ratio 1.66 [95% confidence interval 1.32-2.09]), especially if the dialysis duration was 12 months or longer. Preemptive transplantation was also associated with significant superior kidney graft survival compared to those on dialysis (death-censored: 84.3% vs 75.4%, respectively; estimated half-life of 38.57 [38.33 -38.81] vs 22.35 [22.17 - 22.53] years, respectively). No differences were observed between both groups neither for pancreas graft survival nor for post-transplant surgical complications. Thus, our results sustain the relevance of early referral for pancreas transplantation and the importance of pancreas allocation priority in reducing patient mortality after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation.

Given the increased COVID-19 observed in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and haemodialysis patients, several studies have tried to establish the efficacy of mRNA vaccines in these populations by evaluating their humoral and cellular responses. However, there is currently no information on clinical protection (deaths and hospitalizations), a gap that this study aims to fill.Observational prospective study involving 1,336 KTRs and haemodialysis patients from three dialysis units affiliated to Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Spain, vaccinated with two doses of mRNA-1273 (Moderna) or BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. The outcomes measured were SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosed by a positive RT-PCR fourteen days after the second vaccine dose, hospital admissions derived from infection, and a severe COVID-19 composite outcome, defined as either ICU admission, invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, or death.Six per cent (18/302) of patients on haemodialysis were infected, of whom four required hospital admission (1.3%), only one (0.3%) had severe COVID-19, and none of them died. In contrast, 4.3% (44/1034) of KTRs were infected, and presented more hospital admissions (26 patients, 2.5%), severe COVID-19 (11 patients, 1.1%) or death (4 patients, 0.4%). KTRs had a significantly higher risk of hospital admission than HD patients, and this risk increased with age and male sex (HR 3.37 and 4.74, respectively).The study highlights the need for booster doses in KTRs. In contrast, the haemodialysis population appears to have an adequate clinical response to vaccination, at least up to four months from its administration.

Optimal glycemic control in kidney transplant recipients with diabetes is associated with improved morbidity and better patient and allograft survival. Transplant options for patients with diabetes requiring insulin therapy and chronic kidney disease who are suitable candidates for kidney transplantation should include consideration of beta-cell replacement therapy: pancreas or islet transplantation. International variation related to national regulatory policies exists in offering one or both options to suitable candidates and is further affected by pancreas/islet allocation policies and transplant waiting list dynamics. The selection of appropriate candidates depends on patient age, coexistent morbidities, the timing of referral to the transplant center (predialysis versus on dialysis) and availability of living kidney donors. Therefore, early referral (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) is of the utmost importance to ensure adequate time for informed decision making and thorough pretransplant evaluation. Obesity, cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, smoking, and frailty are some of the conditions that need to be addressed before acceptance on the transplant list, and ideally before dialysis becoming imminent. This review offers insights into selection of pancreas/islet transplant candidates by transplant centers and an update on posttransplant outcomes, which may have practice implications for referring nephrologists.

Profiling of circulating immune cells provides valuable insight to the pathophysiology of acute rejection in organ transplantation. Herein we characterized the peripheral blood mononuclear cells in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients. We conducted a retrospective analysis in a biopsy-matched cohort (n = 67) and compared patients with biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR; 41%) to those without rejection (No-AR). We observed that CD3+ T cells, both CD8+ and CD4+, as well as CD19+ B cells were increased in patients with BPAR, particularly in biopsies performed in the early post-transplant period (p < 0.05) and outperformed lipase (AUC 0.62; p = 0.12) for the diagnosis of acute rejection. We further evaluated whether this could be explained by differences in frequencies prior to transplantation. Patients presenting with early post-transplant rejection (p < 0.01), which were associated with a significant inferior rejection-free graft survival. T cell frequencies in peripheral blood correlated with pancreas acute rejection episodes, and variations prior to transplantation were associated with pancreas early acute rejection.

The dialysis-based definition of Delayed Graft Function (dDGF) is not necessarily objective as it depends on the individual physician's decision. The functional definition of DGF (fDGF, the failure of serum creatinine to decrease by at least 10% daily on 3 consecutive days during the first week post-transplant), may be more sensitive to reflect recovery after the ischemia-reperfusion injury. We retrospectively analyzed both definitions in 253 deceased donor kidney transplant recipients for predicting death-censored graft failure as primary outcome, using eGFR < 25 ml/min/1.73 m2 as a surrogate end-point for graft failure. Secondary outcome was a composite outcome that included graft failure as above and also patient's death. Median follow-up was 3.22 [2.38-4.21] years. Seventy-nine patients developed dDGF (31.2%) and 127 developed fDGF (50.2%). Sixty-three patients fulfilled criteria for both definitions (24.9%). At multivariable analysis, the two definitions were significantly associated with the primary [HR (95%CI) 2.07 (1.09-3.94), P = 0.026 for fDGF and HR (95%CI) 2.41 (1.33-4.37), P = 0.004 for dDGF] and the secondary composite outcome [HR (95%CI) 1.58 (1.01-2.51), P = 0.047 for fDGF and HR (95%CI) 1.67 (1.05-2.66), P = 0.028 for dDGF]. Patients who met criteria for both definitions had the worst prognosis, with a three-year estimates (95%CI) of survival from the primary and secondary outcomes of 2.31 (2.02-2.59) and 2.20 (1.91-2.49) years for fDGF+/dDGF+, in comparison with the other groups (P < 0.01 for trend). fDGF provides supplementary information about graft outcomes on top of the dDGF definition in a modern series of kidney transplantation.

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) leads to increased survival and quality of life, and is an alternative treatment for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and end-stage kidney disease. Due to the particularities of this population (often with multiple comorbidities) and of the surgery (only performed in a few centers), a comprehensive analysis of patients’ experience along the SPKT process is crucial to improve patient care and add value to this procedure. Therefore, we applied a systematic and iterative methodology with the participation of both patients and professional teams working together to explore and identify unmet needs and value-adding steps along the transplant patient journey at an established pancreas transplant program. Four main steps (to comprehend, to explore, to experiment and to assess) led to several interventions around three major areas: Administration and logistics, information and communication, and perceived quality of assistance. As a result, both displacements to the hospital for diagnostic purposes and the time delay involved in joining the patient waiting list for transplantation were reduced in parallel to the administrative procedures. In conclusion, the methodological implementation of key organizational changes has great impact on overall patient experience. Further quantitative analysis from the patient’s perspective will consolidate our program and may add new prototype service design components.

Due to the high vulnerability of the pancreas to ischemia-reperfusion injury, choices regarding preservation solution markedly affect pancreas transplant success. A retrospective single-center analysis of 380 pancreas transplants (2000–2019) was performed to correlate current preservation solutions with transplant outcomes. Early graft failure requiring transplantectomy within 30 days post-transplant occurred in 7.5% for University of Wisconsin (UW) group (n = 267), 10.8% of Celsior (CS) group (n = 83), 28.5% of Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate (HTK) group (n = 7), and none for Institut Georges Lopez-1 (IGL-1) group (n = 23). The most common causes of technical failures in this cohort included abdominal hemorrhage (8.4%); graft pancreatitis (3.7%); fluid collections (2.6%); intestinal complications (6.6%); and vascular thrombosis (20.5%). Although IGL-1 solution provided lower surgical complication rates, no significant differences were found between studied groups. Nevertheless, HTK solution was associated with elevated pancreatitis rates. The best graft survival was achieved at 1 year using UW and IGL-1, and at 3 and 5 years using IGL-1 (p = 0.017). There were no significant differences in patient survival after a median follow-up of 118.4 months. In this setting therefore, IGL-1 solution appears promising for perfusion and organ preservation in clinical pancreas transplantation, compared to other commonly used solutions., This work was supported by grant from Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, reference PID2019-104130RB-I00 awarded to EF-P.

Pancreas graft status in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPKTx) is currently assessed by nonspecific biochemical markers, typically amylase or lipase. Identifying a noninvasive biomarker with good sensitivity in detecting early pancreas graft rejection could improve SPKTx management.Here, we developed a pilot study to explore donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) performance in predicting biopsy-proven acute rejection (P-BPAR) of the pancreas graft in a cohort of 36 SPKTx recipients with biopsy-matched plasma samples. dd-cfDNA was measured using the Prospera test (Natera, Inc.) and reported both as a fraction of the total cfDNA (fraction; %) and as concentration in the recipient's plasma (quantity; copies/mL).In the absence of P-BPAR, dd-cfDNA was significantly higher in samples collected within the first 45 d after SPKTx compared with those measured afterward (median, 1.00% versus 0.30%; median, 128.2 versus 35.3 cp/mL, respectively with both; P = 0.001). In samples obtained beyond day 45, P-BPAR samples presented a significantly higher dd-cfDNA fraction (0.83 versus 0.30%; P = 0.006) and quantity (81.3 versus 35.3 cp/mL; P = 0.001) than stable samples. Incorporating dd-cfDNA quantity along with dd-cfDNA fraction outperformed dd-cfDNA fraction alone to detect active rejection. Notably, when using a quantity cutoff of 70 cp/mL, dd-cfDNA detected P-BPAR with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 93.7%, which was more accurate than current biomarkers (area under curve of 0.89 for dd-cfDNA (cp/ml) compared with 0.74 of lipase and 0.46 for amylase).dd-cfDNA measurement through a simple noninvasive blood test could be incorporated into clinical practice to help inform graft management in SPKTx patients.

Background: Recurrence of immunoglobulin (Ig)A nephropathy (rIgAN) is a growing cause of kidney allograft dysfunction. This study was aimed at investigating factors associated with rIgAN and the subsequent progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Methods: Retrospective study including consecutive patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) who received a kidney transplant in our center between 1992 and 2016 and had a renal biopsy by clinical indication. The date of detection of chronic kidney disease (CKD) 5 was used as renal outcome. Results: Eighty-six kidney transplants were performed in patients with IgAN, 38 (44%) were from living donors (related n = 26). rIgAN was diagnosed in 23 allografts (27%). Renal function and proteinuria at the end of the follow-up period were worst in the rIgAN patients compared to those without rIgAN (2.2 vs. 1.4 mg/dL, p = 0.014, and 1.16 vs. 0.49 g/day, p = 0.005, respectively). Risk of rIgAN and progression to CKD 5 decreased with patient’s age (hazard ratio [HR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.92–0.98, p = 0.002, and HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.83–0.97, p = 0.008 per year, respectively). Patients with rIgAN had a higher risk of progression to CKD 5 (HR 6.7, 95% CI 1.3–35.7, p = 0.025). Full donor-recipient mismatch in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B loci decreased the risk of rIgAN (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06–0.76, p = 0.017). Conclusions: rIgAN was an independent risk factor for ESRD after renal allograft. Younger age increased the risk of rIgAN and CKD 5. Conversely, HLA-B mismatching was a potential protective factor for rIgAN of this glomerular disease.

Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the best treatment for end-stage renal disease. In this setting, a significant percentage of transplants are not undertaken because of medical and nonmedical reasons of both donors and recipients. However, the impact of these discards in a transplant program has not been identified thoroughly so far. Our objective was to clarify key reasons for exclusion of LDKTs and the consequences for the discarded transplant candidates in the following 5 years.Analysis of donors' and recipients' characteristics of 781 couples evaluated in our hospital from January 2005 to December 2013. The consequences of discards in transplant candidates were analyzed in the cohort 2012 to 2013 (n = 106) and followed up until October 2018.In our study group, 402 (51.5%) LDKT couples were successfully donated, and 379 (48.5%) were excluded. Donor and transplant recipient candidates discarded were older at the evaluation (55.07 ± 12.14 years vs 51.73 ± 10.93 years, P .001; 48.81 ± 14.05 years vs 44.62 ± 13.91 years, P .001, respectively). The most frequent reason for kidney discard was medical contraindication found in the potential donor (47.5%; low eGFR, diabetes mellitus, impaired glucose tolerance, high blood pressure, cardiovascular pathology casually found during evaluation, and proteinuria). Of the discarded candidates from 2012 to 2013, 36.8% received a deceased donor kidney transplant, 17% a LDKT with another donor, 7.5% stayed on the waiting list, 18.9% died, 3.8% were excluded from the waiting list, and 14.2% were lost to follow-up.In most cases, transplantation was not undertaken because of donor pathology. Fifty-three percent of the discarded patients were eventually transplanted, with a 31.4% probability to receive an organ from another living donor.

The strict selection of pancreas for transplant has forced the development of different documents to select the suitable organ in order to minimize the risks and complications of the transplant. In 2008, Eurotransplant published the Preprocurement Pancreas Allocation Suitability Score (P-PASS) for pretransplant selection. In 2001 the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona developed a Clinical Consensus Document (CCD). Objectives We aimed to analyze the predictive decision of the pancreas acceptance to offers received in the hospital, according to the CCD criteria and compare it with the recommended value of suitability for accepting the pancreas according to the P-PASS value. Material and Methods We performed a retrospective comparative study between the criteria of selection of the CCD for pancreas from 2016–2017 in comparison with the values obtained if the P-PASS had been used: ≤ 17, acceptance criteria and P-PASS; > 17, risk criteria. We defined the organ reported as rejected or accepted. The accepted organ could be procured and transplanted or discarded. Results With the CCD criteria, 7 more organs were transplanted than if we only applied the potential P-PASS criteria. In contrast, P-PASS would have ruled out an additional 9% of pancreases in relation to CCD criteria. Conclusions According our experience, it is difficult to find an adequate prediction model to select pancreas for transplantation. The application of the DCC criteria increases the number of organs valid for transplantation. At present, new criteria should be re-evaluated within multicenter studies.

Evaluate the weight trajectories after pancreas transplantation (PT) and their relationships with pancreas graft outcomes in type 1 diabetes (T1D).Retrospective cohort study. T1D individuals who underwent PT were recruited (T1D-PT; n = 194) and divided into three groups according to transplantation date: 1999-2004 (n = 57), 2005-2009 (n = 79), 2010-2015 (n = 58). For weight comparisons, a random sample of T1D without renal impairment was also recruited during 2015 (n = 61; T1D-control).The median follow-up for the T1D-PT group was 11.1 years. Despite significant weight loss at 6 months (65.7 ± 12.4 vs. 64.1 ± 11.4 Kg; p 0.001), a stepped increase was seen thereafter (60 months: 68.0 ± 14.0 Kg; p 0.001). Participants from the 2010-2015 period showed higher weight gain (p 0.001), outweighing that observed in the T1D-control (60 months: +4.69 ± 8.49 vs. -0.97 ± 4.59 Kg; p = 0.003). Weight gain between 6 and 36 months was directly associated with fasting glucose and HbA1c at 36 months, and with HbA1c at 60 months (p 0.05). However, in Cox-regression models adjusted for age, sex, and several recipient and PT-related variables, the third tertile of weight gain between 6 and 36 months showed a non-significant increase in the graft failure/dysfunction (HR 2.33 [0.75-7.27]).Weight gain post-PT was associated with glucose-related biochemical markers of graft dysfunction, which needs confirmation in further studies.

Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of death in patients with type 1 diabetes. Of the available risk predictors for this population, the Steno Type 1 Risk Engine (STENO T1) is the only one that includes kidney function as a risk factor, which is a well-described independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease.We explore how simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) modifies the predicted cardiovascular risk by the STENO T1 through a retrospective study including recipients of a first SPKT between 2000 and 2016.Two hundred sixty-eight SPKT recipients with a mean age of 40 y old and a median follow-up of 10 y were included. Before transplantation, the expected incidence of cardiovascular events (CVEs) at 5 and 10 y according to STENO T1 would have been 31% and 50%, respectively, contrasting with an actual incidence of 9.3% and 16% for the same timepoints, respectively (P0.05). These differences were attenuated when STENO T1 was recalculated assuming 12th-mo glomerular filtration rate (at 5 and 10 y predicted CVE incidence was 10.5% and 19.4%, respectively). Early pancreas graft failure (hazard ratio [HR] 3.00, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-7.88; P = 0.02) was an independent risk factor for post-SPKT CVE, alongside kidney graft failure (HR 2.90, 95% CI, 1.53-5.48; P = 0.001), and diabetes duration (HR 1.04, 95% CI, 1.00-1.09, P = 0.04).SPKT decreases in more than two-thirds of the predicted cardiovascular risk by the STENO T1. A functioning pancreas graft further reduces CVE risk, independently of kidney graft function.

It is not well understood why diabetic individuals are more prone to develop severe COVID-19. To this, we here established a human kidney organoid model promoting early hallmarks of diabetic kidney disease development. Upon SARS-CoV-2 infection, diabetic-like kidney organoids exhibited higher viral loads compared with their control counterparts. Genetic deletion of the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in kidney organoids under control or diabetic-like conditions prevented viral detection. Moreover, cells isolated from kidney biopsies from diabetic patients exhibited altered mitochondrial respiration and enhanced glycolysis, resulting in higher SARS-CoV-2 infections compared with non-diabetic cells. Conversely, the exposure of patient cells to dichloroacetate (DCA), an inhibitor of aerobic glycolysis, resulted in reduced SARS-CoV-2 infections. Our results provide insights into the identification of diabetic-induced metabolic programming in the kidney as a critical event increasing SARS-CoV-2 infection susceptibility, opening the door to the identification of new interventions in COVID-19 pathogenesis targeting energy metabolism.

According to preliminary data, seroconversion after mRNA SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination might be unsatisfactory in Kidney Transplant Recipients (KTRs). However, it is unknown if seronegative patients develop at least a cellular response that could offer a certain grade of protection against SARS‐CoV‐2. To answer this question, we prospectively studied 148 recipients of either kidney (133) or kidney‐pancreas (15) grafts with assessment of IgM/IgG spike (S) antibodies and ELISpot against the nucleocapside (N) and the S protein at baseline and two weeks after receiving the second dose of the mRNA‐1273 (Moderna) vaccine. At baseline, 31 patients (20.9%) had either IgM/IgG or ELISpot positivity and were considered to be SARS‐CoV‐2‐pre‐immunized, while 117 (79.1%) patients had no signs of either cellular or humoral response and were considered SARS‐CoV‐2‐naïve. After vaccination, naïve patients who developed either humoral or cellular response were finally 65.0%, of which 29.9% developed either IgG or IgM and 35.0% S‐ELISpot positivity. Factors associated with vaccine unresponsiveness were diabetes and treatment with anti‐thymocytes globulins during the last year. Side effects were consistent with that of the pivotal trial and no DSAs developed after vaccination. In conclusion, mRNA‐1273 SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine elicits either cellular or humoral response in almost two thirds of KTRs.

Enteric complications remain a major cause of morbidity in the post-transplant period of pancreas transplantation despite improvements surgical technique. The aim of this single-center study was to analyze retrospectively the early intestinal complications and their potential relation with vascular events. From 2000 to 2016, 337 pancreas transplants were performed with systemic venous drainage. For exocrine secretion, intestinal drainage was done with hand-sewn anastomosis duodenojejunostomy. Twenty-three patients (6.8%) had early intestinal complications. Median age was 39 years (male: 65.2%). Median cold ischemia time was 11 h [IQR: 9-12.4]. Intestinal complications were intestinal obstruction (n = 7); paralytic ileus (n = 5); intestinal fistula without anastomotic dehiscence (n = 3); ischemic graft duodenum (n = 3); dehiscence of duodenojejunostomy (n = 4); and anastomotic dehiscence in jejunum after pancreas transplantectomy (n = 1). Eighteen cases required relaparotomy: adhesiolysis (n = 6); repeated laparotomy without findings (n = 1); transplantectomy (n = 6); primary leak closure (n = 3); re-positioning of the graft (n = 1); and intestinal resection (n = 1). Of the intestinal complications, 4 were associated with vascular thrombosis, resulting in two pancreatic graft losses. Enteric drainage with duodenum-jejunum anastomosis is safe and feasible, with a low rate of intra-abdominal complications. Vascular thrombosis associated with intestinal complications presents a risk factor for the viability of pancreatic grafts, so prevention and early detection is vital.

Kidney transplant recipients might be at higher risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). However, risk factors for relevant outcomes remain uncertain in this population. This is a multicentric kidney transplant cohort including 104 hospitalized patients between Mar 4 and Apr 17, 2020. Risk factors for death and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were investigated, and clinical and laboratory data was analyzed. The mean age was 60 years. Forty‐seven patients (54.8%) developed ARDS. Obesity was associated to ARDS development (OR 2.63; p=0.04). Significant age differences were not found among patients developing and not developing ARDS (61.3yr vs 57.8yr, p=0.16). Seventy‐six (73%) patients were discharged while 28 (27%) died. Death was more common among the elderly (55yr and 70.8yr, p

Background It is commonly believed that mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) should not be used in high-immunological risk kidney transplant recipients due to a perceived increased risk of rejection. However, almost all trials that examined the association of optimal-dose mTORi with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) have excluded hypersensitized recipients from enrollment. Methods To shed light on this issue, we examined 71 consecutive patients with a baseline calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) ≥50% that underwent kidney transplantation from June 2013 to December 2016 in our unit. Immunosuppression was based on CNI (tacrolimus), steroids and alternatively mycophenolic acid (MPA; n = 38), or mTORi (either everolimus or sirolimus, n = 33, target trough levels 3-8 ng/mL). Results Demographic and immunological risk profiles were similar, and almost 90% of patients in both groups received induction with lymphocyte-depleting agents. Cox-regression analysis of rejection-free survival revealed better results for mTORi versus MPA in terms of biopsy-proven acute rejection (hazard ratio [confidence interval], 0.32 [0.11-0.90], P = 0.031 at univariable analysis and 0.34 [0.11-0.95], P = 0.040 at multivariable analysis). There were no differences in 1-year renal function, Banff chronicity score at 3- and 12-month protocol biopsy and development of de novo donor-specific antibodies. Tacrolimus trough levels along the first year were not different between groups (12-mo levels were 8.72 ± 2.93 and 7.85 ± 3.07 ng/mL for MPA and mTORi group respectively, P = 0.277). Conclusions This single-center retrospective cohort analysis suggests that in hypersensitized kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy similar clinical outcomes may be obtained using mTOR inhibitors compared to mycophenolate.

Pancreas outcomes in pancreas after kidney transplantation (PAK) patients have been reported as being inferior to those of patients who receive simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK). The influence of the kidney donor (i.e. living versus deceased) has never been previously addressed.We retrospectively analysed all pancreas transplants performed in a single centre since 2007 and compared the outcomes between those patients who had previously received a living-donor kidney transplant (pancreas transplantation after living-donor kidney transplantation, PAldK; n = 18) or a deceased-donor kidney transplant (pancreas transplantation after deceased-donor kidney transplantation, PAddK; n = 28), using SPK (n = 139) recipients as a reference.Pancreas survival was similar between all groups, but inferior for PAldK when including only those with a functioning graft at day 90 post-transplantation (P = 0.004). Pancreas acute rejection was significantly increased in PAldK (67%; 1.8 ± 1.4 episodes/graft) when compared with PAddK (25%) and SPK (32%) (P 0.05) patients. In a multivariate Cox regression model including known risk factors for pancreas rejection, PAldK was the only predictor of acute rejection (hazard ratio 6.82, 95% confidence interval 1.51-30.70, P 0.05). No association was found between donor-recipient HLA mismatches and graft rejection. Repeated HLA mismatches between kidney and pancreas donors (0 versus 1-6) did not correlate with pancreas graft rejection or survival in either PAK transplantation group (P 0.05).Pancreas graft outcomes are worse for PAldK when compared with PAddK and SPK patients.

Aims Information on the impact of insulin therapy before pancreas donation on pancreas outcomes is scarce. We aim to explore the influence of insulin therapy before donation on recipient and pancreas graft survival. Methods Registry study including 12,841 pancreas recipients from the OPTN/UNOS registry performed between 2000 and 2017. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to account for covariate imbalance between recipients from a donor with and without insulin requirements. Results A total of 7765 (60%) patients received a pancreas from a donor with insulin before donation (IBD). Pancreas graft survival (death-censored) was similar between recipients from IBD and non-IBD donors at 1, 5 and 10 years (89% vs 89%, 78% vs 79 and 69% vs 70%, respectively, P = 0.35). Recipients from IBD donors presented a similar 90-days pancreas graft survival. After IPTW weighting, IBD donors were neither associated with any post-transplant surgical complication (HR 1.11 [95% CI 0.98–1.24], P = 0.06), nor with risk for recipient death (HR 0.94 [95% CI 0.85–1.04], P = 0.26), nor pancreas graft failure (HR 1.06 [95% CI 0.98–1.16], P = 0.15). Conclusions Insulin therapy before donation in accepted pancreas donors was not associated, per se, with an impaired pancreas graft and patient survival.

Introduction In the 50 years since the first pancreas transplant performed at the University of Minnesota, the surgical techniques employed have undergone many modifications. Techniques such as retroperitoneal graft placement have further improved the ability to reproduce the physiology of the “native” pancreas. We herein present our experience of a modified technique for pancreatic transplant, with the organ placed into a fully retroperitoneal position with systemic venous and enteric drainage of the graft by duodeno-duodenostomy. Methods All pancreas transplantations performed between May 2016 and January 2017 were prospectively entered into our transplant database and retrospectively analyzed. Results A total of 10 transplants were performed using the retroperitoneal technique (6 men: median age of 41 years [IQR 36–54]). Median cold ischemia time was 10.30 h [IQR 5.30–12.10]. The preservation solution used was Celsior (n=7), IGL-1 (n=2), and UW (n=1). No complications related to the new surgical technique were identified. In one patient, transplantectomy at 12 h was performed due to graft thrombosis, probably related to ischemic conditions from a donor with prolonged cardio-respiratory arrest. Another procedure was aborted without completing the graft implant due to an intraoperative immediate arterial thrombosis in a patient with severe iliac atheromatosis. No primary pancreas non-function occurred in the remaining 8 patients. The median hospital stay was 13.50 days [IQR 10–27]. Conclusions Retroperitoneal graft placement appears feasible with easy access for dissection the vascular site; comfortable technical vascular reconstruction; and a decreased risk of intestinal obstruction by separation of the small bowel from the pancreas graft.

To evaluate the changes in cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who were candidates for kidney-pancreas transplantation (KPTx) from 1999 to 2017.Patients with T1D referred for KPTx evaluation were included. The cohort was divided into five groups according to the year of evaluation (1999-2002, 2003-2006, 2007-2010, 2011-2014 and 2015-2017). The control of CVRFs and the prevalence of prior CVD were evaluated.We evaluated 360 patients (64.4% men, age 38.9 ± 7.1 years). LDL-cholesterol100 mg/dl increased from 22.7% to 76.9% (1999-2002 vs. 2015-2017; p 0.001), as did the use of statins (from 24.7% to 74.5%; p 0.001). Systolic blood pressure decreased from 138.8 ± 27.6 to 125.1 ± 27.9 mmHg (p = 0.001) and current smokers from 48% to 25% (p = 0.018). Intensive insulin treatment increased from 34.4% to 93.6% (p 0.001). Diabetes duration before the initiation of renal replacement therapy increased from 23 ± 5.5 to 26.9 ± 8.9 years (p = 0.001). Overall, 30.3% had previous CVD, without significant changes over time (p = 0.699), albeit patients were older and had longer diabetes duration.Patients with T1D and ESRD referred for KPTx have better control of CVRFs over time, which might lead to a decrease in cardiovascular events.

Introduction Nonantigen-specific immunoadsorption (IA) has proven to be effective in acute antibody-mediated rejection (aAMR). However, there is a lack of solid studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of IA with antihuman Ig-columns in aAMR. For chronic-active AMR (cAMR), no studies have evaluated the efficacy of nonantingen-specific IA with antihuman Ig-columns. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of nonantigen-specific IA with antihuman Ig-columns in the treatment of both aAMR and cAMR in kidney transplantation. Material and methods In retrospective and observational study, kidney graft and recipient survival rates were assessed after treatment of aAMR and cAMR with nonantigen-specific IA with Ig-Flex columns (Therasorb) between January 2012 and May 2018. Protocols included nonantigen-specific IA, rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rescue plasma exchange, if necessary. Results The study included 14 patients with AMR (acute in 9, chronic active in 5). For aAMR, mean follow-up was 13 ± 6 months, and patient and graft survival were, respectively, of 100% and 83%, with a mean increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 7.98 ± 12.96, 10.18 ± 16.71, and 11.43 ± 13.85 mL/min/1.72 m2 (P > .05) at 3, 12 months after treatment, and at the end of follow-up, respectively. For cAMR, mean follow-up was 14 ± 8 months, and patient and graft survival were, respectively, of 100% and 60%, with an average increase in eGFR of 4.30 ± 7.86, 5.64 ± 10.47, and 14.5 ± 7.86 mL/min/m2 (P > .05) at 3, 12 months after IA treatment, and at the end of the follow-up, respectively, although 40% did not respond and required chronic hemodialysis. Conclusion Nonantigen-specific IA with Ig-Flex columns was safe and effective for aAMR treatment in kidney transplantation. In cAMR, IA with Ig-Flex columns was associated with a satisfactory kidney graft survival, suggesting that IA could potentially offer some benefits supporting its indication in cAMR.

The TRANSFORM study demonstrated that an immunosuppression based on a combination of calcineurin inhibitors and de-novo mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) is safe and effective in kidney transplant recipients. However, data that validate this approach in clinical practice are currently missing. Analysis of 401 kidney transplant recipients transplanted from June 2013 to December 2016. All patients received tacrolimus with prednisone in combination with either mycophenolate (n = 186) or mTORi (either everolimus or sirolimus, n = 215). A propensity score to receive mTORi was calculated based on the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) from the following parameters: age and sex of donor and recipient, BMI, previous transplants, diabetes, cPRA, dialysis before transplantation, dialysis vintage, type of donor, ABO-incompatibility, HLA-mismatches, induction and ischemia time. Median follow-up was 2.6 [1.9; 3.7] years. Cox-regression analysis suggests good results for mTORi versus MPA in terms of 1-year biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR, P = 0.063), 1-year graft loss (P = 0.025) and patient survival (P

Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of cardiac arrest time (CAT) in donors after brain death (DBD) donors on pancreas transplant outcome. Summary of background data Results from donors after circulatory death report good outcomes despite warm ischemia times up to 57 minutes. Previous cardiac arrest in DBD has been addressed as a potential risk factor, but duration of the CAT has never been evaluated. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis including 342 pancreas transplants performed at our center from 2000 to 2016, and evaluated the effect of previous cardiac arrest in DBD (caDBD) on pancreas transplant outcomes. Results A total of 49 (14.3%) caDBD were accepted for transplantation [median CAT of 5.0 min (IQR 2.5-15.0)]. Anoxic encephalopathy was most frequent and P-PASS higher (16.9 vs 15.6) in caDBD group when compared with other DBD. No differences were found in all other characteristics evaluated.Graft survival was similar between both groups, as was the incidence of early graft failure (EGF). CAT increased the risk for EGF [OR 1.09 (95% CI, 1.01-1.17)], and the duration of CPR discriminated for EGF [AUC of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74-0.98)], with a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 75% at a cutoff of 15 minutes. When evaluated separately, caDBD >15 min increased over 5 times the risk for EGF [HR 5.80 (95% CI, 1.82-18.56); P = 0.003], and these presented fewer days on the ICU (1.0 vs 3.0 d). Conclusion CaDBD donors are suitable for routine pancreas transplantation without increasing EGF risk, and in those with longer CAT it may be prudent to postpone donation a few days to allow a thorough evaluation of organ damage following cardiac arrest.

ObjectiveImprovement in insulin alternatives is leading to a delayed presentation of microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of older (≥50 years) diabetic patients who receive a pancreas transplantation (PT).Research design and methodsWe retrospectively evaluated all 338 PTs performed at our center between 2000 and 2016 (mean follow-up 9.4±4.9 years). Recipient and graft survivals were estimated for up to 10 years after PT. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) before and after PT were included in the analysis.ResultsThirty-nine patients (12%) were ≥50 years old (52.7±2.3 years) at the day of PT, of which 29 received a simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation (SPK) and 10 a pancreas after kidney transplantation (PAK). SPK recipients were first transplants, whereas in the PAK up to 50% were pancreas re-transplantations. Recipient and pancreas graft survivals at 10 years were similar between the group 0.05). The prevalence of MACE prior to PT was similar between both groups (31% vs 29%). Following PT, older recipients presented inferior post-transplant MACE-free survival. In a multivariate regression model, diabetes vintage (HR 1.054, p=0.03) and pre-transplantation MACE (HR 1.98, p=0.011), but not recipient age (HR 1.45, p=0.339), were associated with post-transplant MACE.ConclusionsLong-term survival of older pancreas transplant recipients are similar to younger counterparts. Diabetes vintage, but not age, increased the risk of post-transplantation MACE. These results suggest pancreas transplantation is a valuable treatment alternative to older diabetic patients.

Background Chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (c-aABMR) is an important cause of allograft failure and graft loss in long-term kidney transplants. Methods To determine the efficacy and safety of combined therapy with rituximab, plasma exchange (PE) and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), a cohort of patients with transplant glomerulopathy (TG) that met criteria of active cABMR, according to BANFF’17 classification, was identified. Results We identified 62 patients with active c-aABMR and TG (cg ≥ 1). Twenty-three patients were treated with the combination therapy and, 39 patients did not receive treatment and were considered the control group. There were no significant differences in the graft survival between the two groups. The number of graft losses at 12 and 24 months and the decline of eGFR were not different and independent of the treatment. A decrease of eGFR≥13 ml/min between 6 months before and c-aABMR diagnosis, was an independent risk factor for graft loss at 24 months (OR = 5; P = 0.01). Infections that required hospitalization during the first year after c-aABMR diagnosis were significantly more frequent in treated patients (OR = 4.22; P = 0.013), with a ratio infection/patient-year of 0.65 and 0.20 respectively. Conclusions Treatment with rituximab, PE, and IVIG in kidney transplants with c-aABMR did not improve graft survival and was associated with a significant increase in severe infectious complications. Trial registration Agencia Española de Medicametos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS): 14566/RG 24161. Study code: UTR-INM-2017-01. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-018-1057-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background The progression from acute to chronic antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients is usually not prevented by current therapeutic options. Here, we investigated whether the use of tofacitinib (TOFA), a Janus kinase 3 inhibitor, was capable of preventing the progression of allograft dysfunction in a Fisher-to-Lewis rat model of kidney transplantation. Methods Rats were treated from the third week after transplantation to allow the development of rejection. Treatment was based on cyclosporin A, rapamycin or TOFA. Renal function was assessed at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after transplantation, whereas rat survival, histological lesions, and infiltrating lymphocytes were analyzed at 12 weeks. Results Tofacitinib prolonged graft survival, preserved tubular and glomerular structures and reduced humoral damage characterized by C4d deposition. Tofacitinib was able to reduce donor-specific antibodies. In addition, T and natural killer cell graft infiltration was reduced in TOFA-treated rats. Although rapamycin-treated rats also showed prolonged graft survival, glomerular structures were more affected. Moreover, only TOFA treatment reduced the presence of T, B and natural killer cells in splenic parenchyma. Conclusions Tofacitinib is able to reduce the immune response generated in a rat model of kidney graft rejection, providing prolonged graft and recipient survival, better graft function, and less histological lesions.

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors (sirolimus and everolimus) are a class of immunosuppressive drugs approved for solid organ transplantation (SOT). By inhibiting the ubiquitous mTOR pathway, they present a peculiar safety profile. The increased incidence of serious adverse events in early studies halted the enthusiasm as a kidney sparing alternative to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI).Herein we review mTOR inhibitors safety profile for adult organ transplantation, ranging from acute side effects, such as lymphoceles, delayed wound healing, or cytopenias, to long-term ones which increase morbidity and mortality, such as cancer risk and metabolic profile. Infection, proteinuria, and cutaneous safety profiles are also addressed.In the authors' opinion, mTOR inhibitors are a safe alternative to standard immunosuppression therapy with CNI and mycophenolate/azathioprine. Mild adverse events can be easily managed with an increased awareness and close monitoring of trough levels. Most serious side effects are dose- and organ-dependent. In kidney and heart transplantation mTOR inhibitors may be safely used as either low-dose de novo or through early-conversion. In the liver, conversion 4 weeks post-transplantation may reduce long-term chronic kidney disease secondary to calcineurin nephrotoxicity, without increasing hepatic artery/portal vein thrombosis.

Background Systemic inflammation affects kidney function in a wide range of diseases. Even in kidney transplant recipients, higher levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) are invariably associated with both worse short- and long-term graft outcomes. However, little is known about systemic inflammation in kidney donors and, notably, brain death causes a strong systemic inflammatory response. Objective To analyze the role of systemic inflammation of brain-dead donors on short-term kidney graft outcomes (ie, delayed graft function [DGF], defined as the need of dialysis during the first week after transplantation). Materials and methods Retrospective analysis of clinical and biochemical characteristics of all brain-dead kidney donors generated in the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona in the 2006 to 2015 period (n = 194). Donors who were tested for CRP in the 24 hours before BD declaration were included (n = 97, 50% of initial population). Clinical and biochemical features of their respective recipients (n = 165) were analyzed, comparing recipients who developed DGF (n = 30) with recipients who did not (n = 135). Results Donors whose recipients later developed DGF had much higher CRP values (10.58 [5.1-18.21] vs 4.81 [1.42-12.2] mg/dL, P = .025). Other characteristics associated with the development of DGF were renal biopsy score and recipient dialysis vintage (P = .025 and P = .002, respectively). In logistic regression analysis, PCR maintained significance in the non–expanded criteria donor (ECD) group (odds ratio [OR], 1.102; P = .027), but it lost significance in the ECD group (P = .67). Conclusions Terminal donor CRP was associated with DGF in kidney transplant recipients and proved to be mostly significant in younger donors.

We aimed to determine the epidemiology, risk factors, and impact of bacterial infection on pancreatic function after pancreas transplantation. Data for pancreas transplant recipients were retrospectively reviewed between 2000 and 2014 for at least 1 year. We collected and analyzed post-transplant data for bacterial infection, morbidity, and mortality. During the study period, 312 pancreas transplants were performed. In total, 509 episodes of bacterial infection were diagnosed in 191 patients (61%). Multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms were present in 173 of the 513 isolated microorganisms (33%). Risk factors independently associated with bacterial infection were acute allograft rejection (OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.1-3), the need for post-transplant hemodialysis, (OR 5.3, 95%CI 1.8-15.7) and surgical re-intervention (OR 2.8, 95%CI 1.5-5.1), which was also considered a risk factor for infections caused by MDR bacteria. Graft survival was associated with the occurrence of one or more episodes of bacterial infection (log-rank test = 0.009). Surgical re-intervention was independently associated with graft loss (OR 2.5, 95%CI 1.3-4.7). To conclude, pancreas recipients frequently experienced bacterial infections associated with the need for hemodialysis or surgical re-intervention. Infection by MDR organisms is a growing concern in these patients and was related to graft survival. Graft loss was independently associated with surgical re-intervention.