Search

Objective Emotional distress is common in both survivors and their informal caregivers following admission to a neuroscience intensive care unit (Neuro-ICU) and can negatively affect their individual recovery and quality of life. Neuro-ICU survivor-caregiver dyads can influence each other's emotional distress over time, but whether such influence emerges during dyadic treatment remains unknown. The present study involved secondary data analysis of Neuro-ICU dyads enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of a dyadic resiliency intervention, Recovering Together (RT), versus a health education attention placebo control to test dyadic similarities in emotional distress before and after treatment. Method Data were collected from 58 dyads following Neuro-ICU admission. Emotional distress (depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress) was assessed at baseline, 6 weeks (postintervention), and 12 weeks later. Nonindependence within survivor-caregiver dyads was examined (i.e., correlations between cross-sectional symptoms and changes in symptoms over time); mutual influence of emotional functioning over time (i.e., "partner effects") was examined using cross-lagged path analyses. Results There were strong, positive cross-sectional correlations between survivor and caregiver distress at postintervention and follow-up and between changes in survivor and caregiver distress from baseline to postintervention and postintervention to follow-up. There were no partner effects. Conclusions Neuro-ICU survivors and their informal caregivers show similar changes in emotional distress after treatment. These findings highlight the potential benefits of intervening on both survivor and caregiver distress following Neuro-ICU admission. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Men with advanced prostate cancer (APC) experience high levels of pain, which contribute to poor psychosocial and functional outcomes. Cancer-related distress explains the relationship between pain severity and interference, yet specificity of distress characteristics (e.g., hyperarousal, intrusive, or avoidant symptoms) in explaining associations between pain experiences and well-being has not been explored within APC. This study examined men with APC entering a clinical trial and tested associations of baseline pain, cancer-related distress, and physical and functional well-being.One hundred ninety men with APC enrolled in a randomized-controlled trial and were assessed prior to randomization. The McGill Pain Questionnaire assessed pain severity, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General captures physical and functional well-being. The Impact of Events Scale-Revised measured cancer-specific distress symptoms, including hyperarousal, avoidance, and intrusion symptoms. Controlling for age, cancer stage at diagnosis, income, education, and race/ethnicity, mediation models (SPSS PROCESS, model 4) tested whether cancer-specific distress accounted for the associations between pain severity and physical and functional well-being.Men were on average 68 years of age, White non-Hispanic, with stage IV cancer. Pain severity was related to poorer physical (p .001) and functional well-being (p .001). Associations between pain severity and physical and functional well-being were partially mediated by greater intrusive and hyperarousal symptoms but not avoidant symptoms.For men with APC, intrusive and hyperarousal symptoms may partially explain the relationship between pain severity and decrements in physical and functional well-being. APC pain management should attend to such distress symptoms, which may contribute to interference if left unaddressed.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03149185.

PURPOSE Young onset dementias (YOD) - typically defined by symptom onset before age 65 - are frequently overlooked in medical and community settings. Persons with YOD and their spouses face logistical and emotional challenges on their journey to a diagnosis (e.g. uncertainty about symptoms, lack of medical knowledge, emotional distress). An in-depth understanding of couples' experiences before and immediately following a YOD diagnosis is warranted to inform early psychosocial services for couples. METHODS We utilized dyadic qualitative semi-structured interviews (N = 23) to better understand the nuances of couples' pre-diagnostic and diagnostic experiences with YOD. We used a hybrid of deductive and inductive analytic strategies to identify couple-level themes. RESULTS Fifteen couple-level themes were extracted within four domains: (1) early indicators of symptoms, (2) obtaining a diagnosis, (3) experiences with health care providers, and (4) emotional reactions to the diagnosis. Couples expressed difficulties communicating about early symptoms, receiving accurate and timely diagnostic information, and managing multiple emotions. They described the value of working together to manage care, gain information, establish positive relationships with providers, and promote adjustment. CONCLUSION Findings highlight the shared experiences of couples during the early stages of YOD, including the importance of strong communication with each other and providers. Early and accessible psychosocial services that help couples cope with and communicate about individual and shared stressors are warranted.

Persons living with young-onset dementia and their partners often experience elevated emotional distress as they cope with an unexpected progressive illness during an active life stage (typically ages 45–64 years). Despite their heightened emotional distress, psychosocial resources are both limited and lack the specificity to meet the unique needs of both partners. Our aim was to gain an in-depth understanding of the psychosocial treatment preferences of persons with young-onset dementia and their partners—an important first step in developing a tailored intervention. We conducted semi-structured dyadic interviews with persons with young-onset dementia and their partners ( N = 23) and used a hybrid deductive–inductive approach to thematic analysis. We identified 12 themes across four domains: (1) perceptions of available and lacking resources, (2) preferences for program content, (3) preferences for program format, and (4) barriers and facilitators to participation. Couples indicated there is a lack of specific and family-oriented resources, which can create more stress and relationship strain. Couples endorsed support for a virtual, dyadic intervention delivered shortly after diagnosis focused on providing tools to cope with difficult emotions and symptom progression and enhance communication and meaningful daily living. They also identified potential barriers to program participation and offered suggestions to promote engagement. By using a qualitative approach, we were able to gather nuanced information that can be used to directly inform a feasible, accepted, and person-centered psychosocial intervention for persons with young-onset dementia and their partners.

BACKGROUND: The strategies patients use to cope with chronic pain are key determinants of pain-related treatment outcomes and are often targeted in psychosocial interventions for chronic pain. However, improvements in coping often fade after intervention completion. Here, we test whether previously reported improvements in coping following two novel mind–body and activity interventions are maintained 3 months after completion. METHODS: Eighty-two patients with heterogeneous chronic pain were randomized to two identical mind–body and activity interventions, one with the addition of a Fitbit device (GetActive-Fitbit) and one without it (GetActive; n = 41 each). Participants completed measures of pain-catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, mindfulness, adaptive coping, and pain-resilience at baseline, post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: At follow-up, participants in both groups exhibited sustained improvements in all five coping measures compared to baseline (significant in both groups for all measures except for p = .05 in kinesiophobia in GetActive and p = .07 in pain resilience in GetActive-Fitbit). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, GetActive and GetcActive-Fitbit are promising interventions to sustainably improve coping with chronic pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03412916.

Targets of intervention in cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM), such as benefit finding (BF) and perceived stress management skills (PSMS), may counteract stress-related changes that impact the immune system. This study tested whether BF, PSMS, and optimism influence the effects of CBSM on immune status in men with prostate cancer.Men with prostate cancer were randomized to receive CBSM or a psychoeducation (PE) control comparison (NCT05486754). Life Orientation Test-Revised assessed baseline optimism. The Benefit Finding Scale and Measure of Current Status measured BF and PSMS after CBSM. T-cells and T-helper cells captured immune status change at baseline and 6-months post-CBSM. MPlus and SPSS (PROCESS) tested condition effects and moderated mediation, controlling for covariates.256 primarily middle-aged, White Non-Hispanic or Hispanic men enrolled. PSMS mediated CBSM effects on T-cell and T-helper cell percentage, such that T-cell and T-helper cell percentages were reduced in men in CBSM versus PE via PSMS. Optimism moderated this mediation with the mediating effect of PSMS only observed among men with average optimism versus those with low or high optimism.Baseline psychological characteristics, as well as limited specificity of immune measurement, could explain the conditional effects in this sample.NCT05486754.

Background and Objectives The common and unique psychosocial stressors and adaptive coping strategies of people with young-onset dementia (PWDs) and their caregivers (CGs) are poorly understood. This meta-synthesis used the stress and coping framework to integrate and organize qualitative data on the common and unique psychosocial stressors and adaptive coping strategies employed by PWDs and CGs after a diagnosis of young-onset dementia (YOD). Research Design and Methods Five electronic databases were searched for qualitative articles from inception to January 2020. Qualitative data were extracted from included articles and synthesized across articles using taxonomic analysis. Results A total of 486 articles were obtained through the database and hand searches, and 322 articles were screened after the removal of duplicates. Sixty studies met eligibility criteria and are included in this meta-synthesis. Four themes emerged through meta-synthesis: (a) common psychosocial stressors experienced by both PWDs and CGs, (b) unique psychosocial stressors experienced by either PWDs or CGs, (c) common adaptive coping strategies employed by both PWDs and CGs, and (d) unique adaptive coping strategies employed by either PWDs or CGs. Within each meta-synthesis theme, subthemes pertaining to PWDs, CGs, and dyads (i.e., PWD and CG as a unit) emerged. Discussion and Implications The majority of stressors and adaptive coping strategies of PWDs and CGs were common, supporting the use of dyadic frameworks to understand the YOD experience. Findings directly inform the development of resiliency skills interventions to promote adaptive coping in the face of a YOD diagnosis for both PWDs and CGs.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether two emotion regulation strategies, expressive suppression or cognitive reappraisal, mediated the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depression (MD), and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in first responders (FR) who experienced occupational stressors, using cross-sectional data. An aggregate of 895 first responders (M = 37.32, SD = 12.09, 59.2% male, 91.3% Caucasian) who were recruited through professional organizations and social media sites across North and South American states participated in an online Qualtrics survey. Bivariate correlation analyses demonstrated that occupational stressors were positively correlated with expressive suppression and each mental health outcome but were not significantly correlated with cognitive reappraisal. Mediation analyses demonstrated expressive suppression as a significant mediator between occupational stressors and PTSD, MD, and GAD symptoms, but not cognitive reappraisal. Even though these findings are in purview of a cross-sectional research design, they suggest the importance of practices that bolster first responders’ ability to use more effective and adaptive emotion regulation strategies such as emotion expression, effective communication, and cognitive reappraisal that might help enhance psychological resilience.

Background and Objectives Young-onset dementias (YODs) are a set of progressive illnesses that are stressful for both persons with the diagnosis and their care-partners. Although the stressors differ based on their roles and individual experiences, both individuals are at risk for heightened emotional distress (e.g., depression and anxiety). Understanding the unique stressors for each partner and adaptive coping strategies to manage these stressors is important for informing individual and couples-based psychosocial interventions. Research Design and Methods We conducted open-ended individual interviews with persons with YOD (N = 12) and their care-partners (i.e., romantic partner; N = 17) over live video. We utilized a hybrid of deductive and inductive analysis techniques to extract individual-level themes and subthemes regarding stressors and adaptive coping strategies. Results Persons with YOD identified stressors including burden of YOD symptoms, loss of familial roles, resentment toward partner, isolation, and fear of the future. Care-partners identified stressors including managing their partners’ symptoms, increased responsibilities, caregiving role, loss of intimacy, social isolation, and grief. For adaptive coping strategies, persons with YOD endorsed use of acceptance, promotion of independence, social support, and engaging in pleasurable activities. Care-partners endorsed value of learning about the diagnosis, using resources, optimism, social support, and self-care. Discussion and Implications Findings highlight the unique experiences of persons with YOD and their care-partners. Identified themes can be used to inform role-specific psychosocial interventions for both individuals and couples coping with YOD.

Background and Objectives Chronic pain (CP) and cognitive decline (CD) are highly comorbid and debilitating among older adults. We iteratively developed Active Brains–Fitbit (AB-F), a group mind–body activity program aided by a Fitbit that is feasible and associated with improvements in physical, cognitive, and emotional functioning when delivered in-person to older adults with CP and CD. We adapted our intervention and methodology for remote delivery to bypass barriers to participation. Here we report on a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the virtual AB-F versus a Health Enhancement Program (HEP) educational control followed by qualitative exit interviews. Research Design and Methods Older adults (aged ≥60) with CP and CD (2 cohorts) completed 8 weeks of AB-F (n = 8) or HEP (n = 11). Study procedures were fully remote via live video. Quantitative analyses explored feasibility and acceptability markers and within-group improvements in outcomes. Qualitative analyses were primarily deductive using the Framework Method. Results AB-F met a priori set feasibility benchmarks, similar to our in-person pilot. Participation in AB-F was associated with preliminary signals of improvement in multimodal physical function, emotional function (anxiety), cognitive function, pain intensity, and coping (e.g., pain self-efficacy, catastrophizing). Participation in HEP was associated with smaller or negligible improvements. Exit interviews confirmed feasibility and satisfaction with our completely remote interventions and methodology. Discussion and Implications Results provide evidence for the feasibility of our completely remote study and for initial markers of improvement after AB-F. The results will inform a fully powered remote efficacy trial. Clinical Trial Registration NCT04044183.

Chronic pain is associated with substantial decreases in physical and emotional health. Psychosocial and physical restoration interventions, although potentially helpful, typically show small-to-moderate improvements that are limited to the short term, and often exhibit problematic adherence. Here, we present GetActive-Fitbit, a novel 10-week group program that integrates mind-body skills, pain coping and gradual increases in activity reinforced by a commercially available digital monitoring device (Fitbit). We illustrate the program among a group of 4 adults with heterogeneous chronic pain. We also highlight pre to post-program improvements in physical function (objective, performance-based and self-report), emotional function (depression and anxiety) and other relevant outcomes targeted by the program (e.g., pain intensity, catastrophizing, mindfulness, coping, kinesiophobia, emotional support, social isolation, pain resilience, program satisfaction and impression of change). Group participants’ experiences suggest that GetActive-Fitbit is credible, useful, and shows potential to improve physical and emotional function among this challenging population. Clinical trial number: NCT03412916.

Background and Objectives Diagnoses of young-onset dementias (YODs) are devastating for persons with dementia and spousal caregivers yet limited work has examined both partners’ perceptions of challenges and coping after diagnosis. This qualitative study investigated the psychosocial stressors and adaptive coping strategies in couples diagnosed with YOD to inform the development of psychosocial support resources. Research Design and Methods We conducted live video dyadic interviews with couples (persons with YOD and spousal caregivers together; N = 23 couples). We transcribed interviews and coded data based on a hybrid deductive–inductive approach, with the structure of the coding framework informed by the stress and coping framework, and all codes derived from the data. We derived themes and subthemes related to psychosocial stressors and adaptive coping. Results We identified 5 themes related to psychosocial stressors: the impact of diagnosis, social and family relationships, changing roles and responsibilities, planning for an uncertain future, and couple communication and relationship strain. We identified 7 themes related to adaptive coping strategies: processing emotions and cultivating acceptance, promoting normalcy, efforts to preserve persons with YOD’s independence and identity, collaborative and open communication, social support, meaning-making, humor, and positivity, and lifestyle changes and self-care. Discussion and Implications We replicated several themes regarding stressors and adaptive coping strategies from prior YOD research and identified novel themes and subthemes related to dyadic stressors, sources of couples’ relationship strain, and the ways in which couples effectively cope with YOD. Findings inform the development of dyadic interventions to reduce YOD-related distress for both persons with dementia and spousal caregivers.

Neuro-ICU hospitalization for an acute neurological illness is often traumatic and associated with heightened emotional distress and reduced quality of life (QoL) for both survivors and their informal caregivers (i.e., family and friends providing unpaid care). In a pilot study, we previously showed that a dyadic (survivor and caregiver together) resiliency intervention (Recovering Together [RT]) was feasible and associated with sustained improvement in emotional distress when compared with an attention placebo educational control. Here we report on changes in secondary outcomes assessing QoL. Survivors (n = 58) and informal caregivers (n = 58) completed assessments at bedside and were randomly assigned to participate together as a dyad in the RT or control intervention (both 6 weeks, two in-person sessions at bedside and four sessions via live video post discharge). We measured QoL domain scores (physical health, psychological, social relations, and environmental), general QoL, and QoL satisfaction using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Abbreviated Instrument at baseline, post treatment, and 3 months’ follow-up. We conducted mixed model analyses of variance with linear contrasts to estimate (1) within-group changes in QoL from baseline to post treatment and from post treatment to 3 months’ follow-up and (2) between-group differences in changes in QoL from baseline to post treatment and from post treatment to 3 months’ follow-up. We found significant within-group improvements from baseline to post treatment among RT survivors for physical health QoL (mean difference 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39–3.06; p = 0.012), environmental QoL (mean difference 1.29; 95% CI 0.21–2.36; p = 0.020), general QoL (mean difference 0.55; 95% CI 0.13–0.973; p = 0.011), and QoL satisfaction (mean difference 0.87; 95% CI 0.36–1.37; p = 0.001), and those improvements sustained through the 3-month follow-up. We found no significant between-group improvements for survivors or caregivers from baseline to post treatment or from post treatment to 3 months’ follow-up for any QoL variables (i.e., domains, general QoL, and QoL satisfaction together). In this pilot study, we found improved QoL among survivors, but not in caregivers, who received RT and improvements sustained over time. These RT-related improvements were not significantly greater than those observed in the control. Results support a fully powered randomized controlled trial to allow for a definitive evaluation of RT-related effects among dyads of survivors of acute brain injury and their caregivers.

Key Points Question Is participation in a dyadic resiliency intervention associated with a measurable reduction in symptoms of depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress (PTS) compared with participation in an educational control? Findings In this pilot, single-blind, randomized clinical trial of 58 dyads of survivors of the neuroscience intensive care unit and their informal caregivers, survivors and caregivers who received the active intervention experienced a significant reduction in symptoms of depression, anxiety, and PTS. Meaning In this pilot randomized clinical trial, the dyadic resiliency intervention was feasible, and the findings suggest that it may prevent chronic emotional distress in survivors of acute brain injury and their caregivers., This pilot randomized clinical trial evaluates the feasibility and preliminary effect of the novel dyadic resiliency intervention Recovering Together in reducing symptoms of depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress among patients hospitalized in the neuroscience intensive care unit and their informal caregivers., Importance To our knowledge, there are no evidence-based interventions to prevent chronic emotional distress (ie, depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress [PTS]) in critical care survivors and their informal caregivers. Objective To determine the feasibility and preliminary effect of the novel dyadic resiliency intervention Recovering Together (RT) on reducing symptoms of depression, anxiety, and PTS among hospitalized patients and their informal caregivers. Design, Setting, and Participants This single-blind, pilot randomized clinical trial of RT vs an educational control was conducted among 58 dyads in which either the survivor or caregiver endorsed clinically significant symptoms of depression, anxiety, or PTS. The study was conducted in the neuroscience intensive care unit at Massachusetts General Hospital. Data were collected from September 2019 to March 2020. Interventions Both RT and control programs had 6 sessions (2 at bedside and 4 via live video after discharge), and both survivor and caregiver participated together. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were feasibility of recruitment and intervention delivery, credibility, and satisfaction. The secondary outcomes included depression and anxiety (measured by the Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale), PTS (measured by the PTSD Checklist–Civilian Version), and intervention targets (ie, mindfulness, measured by the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale–Revised; coping, measured by the Measure of Current Status–Part A; and dyadic interpersonal interactions, measured by the Dyadic Relationship Scale). Main outcomes and targets were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. Results The 58 dyads were randomized to RT (29 dyads [50.0%]; survivors: mean [SD] age, 49.3 [16.7] years; 9 [31.0%] women; caregivers: mean [SD] age, 52.4 [14.3] years; 22 [75.9%] women) or control (29 dyads [50.0%]; survivors: mean [SD] age, 50.3 [16.4] years; 12 [41.3%] women; caregivers, mean [SD] age, 52.1 [14.9], 17 [58.6%] women). Feasibility (recruitment [76%], randomization [100%], and data collection [83%-100%]), adherence (86%), fidelity (100%; κ = 0.98), satisfaction (RT: 57 of 58 [98%] with scores >6; control: 58 of 58 [100%] with scores >6), credibility (RT: 47 of 58 [81%] with scores >6; control: 46 of 58 [80%] with scores >6), and expectancy (RT: 49 of 58 [85%] with scores >13.5; 51 of 58 [87%] with scores >13.5) exceeded benchmarks set a priori. Participation in RT was associated with statistically and clinically significant improvement between baseline and postintervention in symptoms of depression (among survivors: −4.0 vs −0.6; difference, −3.4; 95% CI, −5.6 to −1.3; P = .002; among caregivers: −3.8 vs 0.6; difference, −4.5; 95% CI, −6.7 to −2.3; P

Background and Objectives The relationship between chronic pain (CP) and cognitive decline (CD) is bidirectional among older adults. The CP–CD comorbidity can progressively worsen cognitive, physical, emotional, and social functioning with aging. We explored the feasibility and outcomes associated with 2 mind–body activity programs for CP and CD that focus on increasing walking using time goals (Active Brains) or step-count reinforced via Fitbit (Active Brains–Fitbit). Research Design and Methods Older adults with CP and CD participated in a nonrandomized open pilot of Active Brains (n = 6) and Active Brains–Fitbit (n = 6) followed by exit interviews. Quantitative analysis explored feasibility markers and signals of improvement on physical, cognitive, and emotional function, as well as additional program targets. Qualitative analyses were predominantly deductive and applied the Framework Method to enhance the programs and methodology. Results Both programs met a priori feasibility benchmarks. We found within-group improvements for pain intensity, pain-specific coping, physical function, and cognitive function in both programs. Exit interviews confirmed high satisfaction with both programs. Discussion and Implications Our mixed-methods data provide preliminary evidence of feasibility, showed promise for improving outcomes, and yielded critical information to further enhance the programs. We discuss “lessons learned” and future directions.

This cross-sectional study aimed to address whether occupational stressors are associated with adverse mental health outcomes in first responders via lower social support. A total of 895 first responders including emergency medical technicians, paramedics, and firefighters from 50 US States and the Virgin Islands (mean = 37.32, standard deviation = 12.09, 59.2% male, and 91.3% White) completed an online survey. Bivariate analyses indicated that occupational stressors were positively correlated with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depression (MD), and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) symptoms, and negatively correlated with social support, whereas social support was negatively correlated with PTSD, MD, and GAD symptoms. Mediation analyses revealed significant indirect effects of occupational stressors on PTSD, MD, and GAD symptoms via social support, after controlling for covariates. Although longitudinal research is needed for a more robust examination of this pathway, the results highlight the importance of social support in first responders. Efforts to augment the support systems of first responders are recommended.

Increasing activity is important yet challenging among people with chronic pain. Objective assessment of activity using accelerometers (i.e., ActiGraph) has gained popularity, but reactivity to assessment and non-adherence to wearing the ActiGraph may bias data. We explored: 1) experiences of wearing the ActiGraph to identify ways to increase adherence and facilitate accurate assessment of activity; and 2) barriers and facilitators to increasing activity following two mind-body activity programs to optimize future interventions. We conducted semi-structured exit interviews with 13 participants with heterogenous chronic pain who completed a randomized controlled trial of two mind-body activity programs. We analyzed transcripts using a framework approach to generate themes. Participants indicated that receiving reminders increased ActiGraph wear adherence and reported that program skills such as gratitude, pacing, mindfulness, and deep breathing were facilitators to increasing activity, while medical problems were barriers. Interventions aiming to increase activity may benefit from emphasizing mind-body skills and sending ActiGraph wear reminders.

Key Points Question How do couples cope with stressors following a diagnosis of young-onset dementia (YOD) individually and as a dyad? Findings In this qualitative study of 23 couples, those managing YOD engaged in patterns of coping consistent with dyadic coping theoretical models. Couples described patterns of stress communication and positive and negative coping behaviors enacted by individual partners and the couple as a unit. Meaning The findings of this study could inform the development of dyadic psychosocial services for couples managing YOD and other progressive illnesses., This qualitative thematic analysis explores the lived experiences of couples managing a young-onset dementia diagnosis using an integrated dyadic coping model., Importance A diagnosis of young-onset dementia (YOD) is a life-altering event for both persons with dementia and their spousal caregivers. Dyadic coping (DC) theoretical models acknowledge that dyads cope with stressors as a unit, but these models have yet to be used in YOD. Objective To explore the lived experiences of couples managing YOD using an integrated DC model. Design, Setting, and Participants This qualitative study recruited couples from a single major medical setting and through social media. Eligibility criteria included cohabitation, 1 partner diagnosed with YOD and able to participate, and both partners willing to participate. Live online video interviews were conducted from March to June 2020. Exposures One semistructured interview, which was recorded and subsequently transcribed. Recruitment was stopped once thematic saturation was reached. Main Outcomes and Measures Five themes were deductively derived based on the integrated DC framework, including stress communication, positive individual DC, positive conjoint DC, negative individual DC, and negative conjoint DC. Within each theme, subthemes were inductively identified to further characterize couples’ dyadic coping experiences with YOD. Results A total of 23 couples were interviewed, comprising persons with dementia (11 women [48%]; mean [SD] age, 61.3 [4.65] years; mean [SD] time from diagnosis, 3.11 [3.85]) years; and spousal caregivers (13 women [57%]; mean [SD] age, 60.5 [5.40] years). Data supported the 5 a priori DC themes and novel subthemes describing couples’ experiences with YOD. Specifically, couples enacted positive conjoint DC by approaching challenges using a teamwork approach to problem solving and relying on collaborative communication. In contrast, couples engaged in negative conjoint DC through mutual avoidance, leading to increased negative communication and conflict. Couples described initially engaging in avoidance and withdrawal to navigate YOD-related stressors. While these strategies provided short-term relief from challenging emotions, they prevented engagement in adaptive coping (eg, acceptance and collaborative problem-solving) to promote long-term adjustment. Conclusions and Relevance This study used an evidence-based integrated DC approach to identify the positive and negative coping behaviors of couples managing YOD. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use a DC framework to guide qualitative analysis, and it provides valuable insights into DC strategies used by couples navigating YOD-related stressors. Findings can inform the development of dyadic psychosocial services for couples managing YOD and have implications for other progressive illnesses.