Search

Background Magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and endoscopic cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) are the most frequently employed second-step procedures to detect biliary and pancreatic abnormalities in patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP) of unknown aetiology. MRCP and EUS both give a better view of the bilio-pancreatic ductal system after secretin stimulation (MRCP-S, EUS-S). EUS also serves to identify changes in the pancreatic parenchyma consistent with chronic pancreatitis, at an early stage. However, no studies have compared MRCP-S, EUS-S, and ERCP in the diagnosis of recurrent pancreatitis. Aim To prospectively compare the diagnostic yield of MRCP-S, EUS-S, and ERCP in the evaluation of patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis with non-dilated ducts, of unknown aetiology. Methods Forty-four consecutive patients with ARP were prospectively scheduled to undergo MRCP-S, EUS-S and ERCP, in accordance with a standard protocol approved by the institutional review board. Diagnoses such as biliary microlithiasis, congenital variants of the pancreatic ducts, chronic pancreatitis and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction were compared between the three procedures. The diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis was established according to ductal morphology by MRCP-S and ERCP, ductal and parenchymal morphology by EUS-S. Results The three procedures combined achieved a diagnosis that could have explained the recurrence of pancreatitis in 28/44 patients (63.6%). EUS-S recognized ductal and/or parenchymal abnormalities with the highest frequency (35/44 patients, 79.5%). Both MRCP-S and EUS-S were superior to ERCP for detecting pancreatic ductal abnormalities. EUS-S showed up pancreatic parenchymal changes in more than half the cases. Both EUS and MRCP secretin kinetics were concordant in identifying two cases with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Conclusions The diagnostic yield of EUS-S in recurrent pancreatitis with non-dilated ducts and unknown aetiology was 13.6% and 16.7% higher than MRCP-S and ERCP respectively (although not significant), which both gave substantially similar diagnostic yields. In no case did ERCP alone find a diagnosis missed by the other two procedures. MRCP-S and EUS-S should both be used in the diagnostic work-up of idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis as complementary, first-line, techniques, instead of ERCP.

Background and study aims Acute pancreatitis is still the most common complication after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) and cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The aim of this study was to detect the time when the peak of serum amylase was predictive for postprocedure pancreatitis or long-lasting severe hyperamylasemia, in order to plan the follow-up of patients. Methods Serum amylase activity was measured in a prospective series of 409 consecutive patients after ES, immediately before ES and two, four, eight and 24 hours thereafter; the two, four and eight-hour data were compared with those at 24 hours and with the outcome. Evaluation was done separately for the 198 cases with pancreatic duct opacification and for the 202 cases at high risk for postprocedure pancreatitis. Results Twenty-four hours after ES, amylase was still more than five times the upper normal limit in 26 patients, associated with pancreatic-like pain in 19 of them (mild/moderate pancreatitis) and asymptomatic in the remaining seven (long-lasting severe hyperamylasemia). There was a significant difference at all sampling times between the 26 patients with 24-hour severe hyperamylasemia and those with the lower level. Although the sensitivity of amylase measurement in detecting pancreatitis was highest at eight hours, in practice the four-hour assessment appears a reliable predictor. Almost all patients with serum amylase levels more than five times the upper normal limit at four, eight and 24 hours had had pancreatic duct opacification. In contrast, patient-related risk factors for postprocedure pancreatitis did not play a significant role in the present series. Conclusions Serum amylase assessment four hours after ES is a reliable, cost-effective follow-up and minimizes the likelihood of underestimating the risk of post-procedure pancreatic reaction. It should be recommended particularly in out-patients and when pancreatic duct opacification has occurred.

56 patients with large CBD or intrahepatic stones underwent endoscopic and/or percutaneous treatment followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Percutaneous access to the biliary tract was chosen when an endoscopic approach was not possible (hepaticojejunostomy in 5 patients, 1 juxtapapillary diverticulum and I inflammatory bile duct stricture). Visualization of stones was achieved radiologically in 32 patients and by ultrasound in 24. The procedure was successful in 47 of 56 treated patients (83.9%). Clearance of the biliary tract was obtained in 25 cases (53%), whereas in 22 cases (47%) complete clearing of biliary tract was obtained only after endoscopic extraction of fragments (17 cases) or percutaneous (5 cases). The median number of shock waves in each session was 1725 (range 300–3166), which were applied during one (n=30), two (n=22) or three sessions (n=4). The only complications were 1 case of symptomatic hyperamylasemia and 3 cases of macrohematuria. In conclusion, extracorporeal lithotripsy combined with endoscopic and/or percutaneous treatment is a real alternative to surgery for difficult stones.

Background Type 1 sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is a clinical entity characterised by biliary-type pain, elevated liver biochemical tests, and common bile duct dilation. Sphincter fibrosis is a common finding in this type of dysfunction and may require in some cases a differential diagnosis with a malignant intra-papillary disease. Optical coherence tomography permits high-resolution, real-time imaging of the sphincter of Oddi microstructure by a probe inserted into the common bile duct through an ERCP catheter. No data exist on the evaluation of sphincter of Oddi fibrosis by optical coherence tomography during ERCP in vivo. Objective To assess the feasibility of optical coherence tomography investigation of the sphincter of Oddi structure and assess its potential for diagnosing type 1 sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Patients Ten consecutive patients, five with biliary-type 1 sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and five with pancreatic head/mid-body adenocarcinoma not involving the papillary region, who underwent both endoscopic ultrasound and therapeutic ERCP, were investigated by optical coherence tomography immediately before biliary sphincterotomy or stenting. Results In all sphincter of Oddi dysfunction patients optical coherence tomography recognised a hyper-reflective intermediate, fibro-muscular layer, significantly thicker than in patients with non-pathological sphincter of Oddi (p Conclusions Optical coherence tomography imaging recognised an increased thickness and reflectance of the fibro-muscular layer of the sphincter of Oddi, very likely determined by fibrosis, and was not time-consuming; it can be safely used during ERCP to confirm the diagnosis in difficult cases. Its use in clinical practice has one important limitation since it requires magnification in the post-procedure computer analysis to obtain images useful for diagnosis.

Coeliac disease (CD) is a common condition with many atypical manifestations and an estimated worldwide prevalence of 1 in 266.1 It often goes unrecognised because characteristic histopathological abnormalities must be found to confirm the diagnosis. Endoscopic signs of CD are described in the literature but cannot be relied upon for detection of the disease because their sensitivity and specificity are not high. To investigate CD in every patient undergoing oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) for dyspeptic symptoms is not realistic, especially if we consider the significant costs of histological handling. Therefore, a way of detecting CD is selection of patients in which biopsies of the duodenal mucosa must be performed. A useful new medical technique, optical coherence tomography (OCT), that combines the principles of ultrasound and infrared backscattering light, …

Background Endoscopic ultrasonography, both conventional and interventional, has been used increasingly during the past 20 years and is deemed a safe technique. Its complication rate, however, has been studied to only a limited extent. This multicentre investigation sought to establish the complication rate for a large number of endoscopic ultrasonography procedures. Methods By means of a questionnaire, we collected data from six centres on the number of endoscopic ultrasonography examinations performed and divided them into conventional and interventional examinations of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Information was obtained on technical modalities such as instruments and sedation and, for interventional endoscopic ultrasonography, indications, pre-procedural exams and technical details (needle calibre, number of passes) had to be specified. Complications were classified as mild, moderate, severe or fatal and their onset as immediate, early or late. Variables that entered into the analysis of complication rate included type of endoscopic ultrasonography instrument used, type and site of lesion biopsied, number of needle passes and operator experience. Results Eleven thousand five hundred thirty nine endoscopic ultrasonographic procedures were reported, of which 10,731 were conventional and 808 interventional. No deaths occurred; there were 14 (0.12%) complications, 5 (0.046%) of them following conventional endoscopic ultrasonography and 9 (1.11%) after interventional endoscopic ultrasonography. Seven complications were mild, four moderate and three severe. Conclusions Both conventional and interventional endoscopic ultrasonography were confirmed to be acceptably safe techniques.

Background and study aims Several drugs have been used for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis with conflicting results and no data referring to the routine use of a pharmacological prophylaxis have been published up to now. Aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis and costs in a series of consecutive patients who have undergone ERCP procedures before and after the introduction of a routine prophylaxis with gabexate in all cases. Patients and methods Data from 1312 patients who underwent ERCP procedures without gabexate prophylaxis and from 1149 consecutive patients with 1 g i.v. gabexate, were retrospectively evaluated during a 6-year period. Patients were also subdivided in standard- and high-risk subjects, on the basis of patient- and technique-related risk factors: 984 subjects (39.9%) had one or more conditions that placed them at high risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis. Results Post-ERCP pancreatitis was reported in 76 out of 2461 patients (3.1%). The frequency of pancreatitis appeared significantly reduced in the gabexate period in comparison with before gabexate in overall cases (2.2% versus 3.9%; p = 0.019); however, the reduction was significant only for high-risk patients (3.8% versus 7.3%; p = 0.001). Severe hyperamylasaemia at 4–6 h and 24 h after the procedure was also significantly reduced only in high-risk patients (p = 0.001). Routine prophylaxis with gabexate appeared cost-effective in high-risk patients. Conclusions Routine gabexate prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction of post-ERCP pancreatitis rate, severe hyperamylasaemia and hospitalisation-related costs only in high-risk patients. However, gabexate appeared unable to reduce the incidence of severe pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM The identification of factors which increase the risk of acute pancreatitis, the most common and most severe complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), is of considerable importance. However, in four large prospective studies, the reported incidence of identified risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis was found to be variable. The aim of this study was to identify the most important risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a meta-analysis of 15 prospective clinical studies, selected out of 52 reviewed articles, in which risk factors for pancreatitis were identified. Of the 14 risk factors identified, five were patient characteristics and nine were related to the endoscopic technique. RESULTS When patient-related risk factors were analysed, the relative risk for suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction was 4.09 (95 % CI 3.37 to 4.96; P < 0.001); for female gender, 2.23 (95 % CI 1.75 to 2.84, P < 0.001); and for previous pancreatitis, 2.46 (95 % CI 1.93 to 3.12, P < 0.001). Two endoscopy-related factors were confirmed: for precut sphincterotomy the relative risk was 2.71 (95 % CI 2.02 to 3.63, P < 0.001); for pancreatic injection the relative risk was 2.2 (95 % CI 1.6 to 3.01, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis provides a clear basis for planning pharmacological studies or studies of new endoscopic techniques in patients at high risk of developing post-ERCP pancreatitis. Knowing which patients are most at risk may also make it easier to decide who should be considered unsuitable for same-day discharge.

Background. The reported incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde-cholangiopancreatography/sphincterotomy pancreatitis ranges between 1.3% and 12.8%. This may likely reflect different definitions of pancreatitis and methods of data collection, rather than differences in patient populations, indications and endoscopic expertise. Aims. The present study evaluated the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde-cholangiopancreatography/sphincterotomy pancreatitis using different definition criteria and different data collection methods. Patients. The 24-hour clinical and enzymatic course of 1185 procedures was recorded. Methods. Pancreatic-like pain and hyperamylasaemia were evaluated either 6 to 8 hours or 24 hours after the procedure; computed tomography scan was performed in those patients with 24-hour pancreatic pain associated with hyperamylasaemia more than three times the upper normal limit. Results. Computed tomography scan findings consistent with pancreatitis were observed in 1.9% of cases, only among those patients with 24-hour pancreatic-like pain and hyperamylasaemia over five times the upper normal limit. The 6–8-hour and 24-hour pancreatic-like pain was associated with serum amylase levels at least three times higher in 11.7% and 6.6% and five times higher or more in 7.4% and 5.1 %, respectively; 6–8 and 24-hour hyperamylasaemia higher than five times the upper normal limit, irrespective of pancreatic-like pain, was reported in 8.3% and in 6.9% of cases. No patients with serum amylase values lower than three times the upper normal limit had clinical symptoms. Conclusions. The incidence of post-procedure pancreatitis ranged from 1.9% to 11.7% depending on the definition criteria adopted.