1. Autologous transplant vs oral chemotherapy and lenalidomide in newly diagnosed young myeloma patients: A pooled analysis
- Author
-
F Gay, S Oliva, M T Petrucci, V Montefusco, C Conticello, P Musto, L Catalano, A Evangelista, S Spada, P Campbell, R Ria, M Salvini, M Offidani, A M Carella, P Omedé, A M Liberati, R Troia, A M Cafro, A Malfitano, A P Falcone, T Caravita, F Patriarca, A Nagler, A Spencer, R Hajek, A Palumbo, and M Boccadoro
- Subjects
Oncology ,Melphalan ,Oral ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Salvage therapy ,Administration, Oral ,Aged ,Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic ,Humans ,Middle Aged ,Multiple Myeloma ,Salvage Therapy ,Thalidomide ,Transplantation, Autologous ,Stem Cell Transplantation ,Hematology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Clinical Trials ,Lenalidomide ,Multiple myeloma ,Chemotherapy ,Transplantation ,business.industry ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Phase III as Topic ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Administration ,business ,Autologous ,030215 immunology ,medicine.drug - Abstract
In newly diagnosed myeloma patients, upfront autologous transplant (ASCT) prolongs progression-free survival 1 (PFS1) compared with chemotherapy plus lenalidomide (CC+R). Salvage ASCT at first relapse may still effectively rescue patients who did not receive upfront ASCT. To evaluate the long-term benefit of upfront ASCT vs CC+R and the impact of salvage ASCT in patients who received upfront CC+R, we conducted a pooled analysis of 2 phase III trials (RV-MM-209 and EMN-441). Primary endpoints were PFS1, progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), overall survival (OS). A total of 268 patients were randomized to 2 courses of melphalan 200 mg/m2 and ASCT (MEL200-ASCT) and 261 to CC+R. Median follow-up was 46 months. MEL200-ASCT significantly improved PFS1 (median: 42 vs 24 months, HR 0.53; P
- Published
- 2017