1. Transvenous Lead Extraction in Adult Patient with Leads Implanted in Childhood-Is That the Same Procedure as in Other Adult Patients?
- Author
-
Andrzej Kutarski, Wojciech Jacheć, Anna Polewczyk, Dorota Nowosielecka, Maria Miszczak-Knecht, Monika Brzezinska, and Katarzyna Bieganowska
- Subjects
Adult ,Pacemaker, Artificial ,Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Defibrillators, Implantable ,Young Adult ,pacing in children ,lead extraction in young adults ,complications of pacing ,lead extraction complexity ,Treatment Outcome ,Lead ,Risk Factors ,Humans ,Child ,Device Removal ,Retrospective Studies - Abstract
Background: Lead management in children and young adults is still a matter of debate. Methods: To assess the course of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) in adults with pacemakers implanted in childhood (CIP) we compared 98 CIP patients with a control group consisting of adults with pacemakers implanted in adulthood (AIP). Results: CIP patients differed from AIP patients with respect to indications for TLE and pacing history. CIP patients were four–eight times more likely to require second-line or advanced tools. Furthermore, CIP patients more often than AIP were prone to developing complications: major complications (MC) (any) 2.6 times; hemopericardium 3.2 times; severe tricuspid valve damage 4.4 times; need for rescue cardiac surgery 3.7 times. The rate of procedural success was 11% lower because of 4.8 times more common lead remnants and 3.1 times more frequent permanently disabling complications. Conclusions: Due to system-related risk factors TLE in CIP patients is more difficult and complex. TLE in CIP is associated with an increased risk of MC and incomplete lead removal. A conservative strategy of lead management, acceptable in very old patients seems to be less suitable in CIP because it creates a subpopulation of patients at high risk of major complications during TLE in the future.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF