1. Effects of acute angle, proximal bending, and distal bending in the deployment vessels on incomplete low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) expansion: an in vitro study
- Author
-
Ryotaro Otsuka, Noritaka Sano, Makoto Hayase, Sadaharu Torikoshi, Hiroyuki Ikeda, Daisuke Uesaka, and Hiroki Toda
- Subjects
Models, Anatomic ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Acute angle ,Endovascular Procedures ,Self Expandable Metallic Stents ,Stent ,Intracranial Aneurysm ,General Medicine ,Bending ,Curvature ,Blood Vessel Prosthesis ,Treatment Outcome ,Stent deployment ,medicine ,Humans ,In vitro study ,Inner diameter ,Surgery ,Endothelium, Vascular ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,Retrospective Studies ,Biomedical engineering - Abstract
Background A low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) device may incompletely expand during stent deployment in tortuous vessels. However, the cause of incomplete expansion remains uninvestigated. We aimed to examine in vitro the factors causing incomplete expansion in LVIS deployment by using various vessel models. Methods A linear model group was created by connecting linear silicone tubes (inner diameter 4 mm) at both sides of the LVIS deployment vessel (inner diameter 4 mm) with different curvature angles of 10–140° at 10° intervals. For comparison, proximal and distal bending model groups were created, both with 90° bending on the proximal/distal larger curvature side of the deployment vessel. A single operator macroscopically deployed an LVIS (4.5×32 mm) four times in each model and 56 times in each group. Results In each model group the LVIS deployment vessel with a narrow curvature angle incompletely expanded. Incomplete expansion occurred significantly more frequently in the distal bending model group (34%, 19/56) compared with that in the linear model group (14.3%, 8/56; p Conclusions Factors such as acute angle, distal bending, and proximal bending of the deployment vessel can cause incomplete LVIS expansion.
- Published
- 2020