Search

Diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis may be complex and therefore justify the discussion of therapeutic decisions in a multidisciplinary endometriosis board (MEB). The development of endometriosis regional expert centers requires an assessment of the quality and relevance of MEB.Qualitiative retrospective study on patients whose management was discussed in Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud between June 2013 and December 2017.Among 376 patients presented in MEB, 309 (80.2%) were painful and 184 (59.5%) had complex endometriosis. A complete clinical evaluation was performed in 120 (38.8%) patients. MRI was performed for 370 (98.4%) patients including 303 (81.9%) with a second reading by an expert radiologist. These second readings allowed a diagnosis correction in 88 (60.7 %) patients with complex endometriosis. MR enterography (27.8 %) and rectal endoscopic sonography (14.4%) were the most frequently used third-line exams to complete the initial imaging of digestive lesion in patients with rectal endometriosis. Surgery was proposed for 199 (52,9%) patients including 108 (58,7%) with complex endometriosis.One of the major interests of MEB in endometriosis is the second reading of MRI, which, by identifying complex endometriosis initially undiagnosed or underestimated, enabled to better discuss the benefits/risks of therapeutic choices, and to organize complex surgeries when those were retained. The development of MEB in regional expert centers will contribute to optimizing the relevance of care for patients with endometriosis.

Endometriosis is a common condition that causes pain and infertility. It can lead to absenteeism and also to multiple surgeries with a consequent risk of impaired fertility, and constitutes a major public health cost. Despite the existence of numerous national and international guidelines, the management of endometriosis remains suboptimal. To address this issue, the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) and the Society of Gynaecological and Pelvic Surgery (SCGP) convened a committee of experts tasked with defining the criteria for establishing a system of care networks, headed by Expert Centres, covering all of mainland France and its overseas territories. This document sets out the criteria for the designation of Expert Centres. It will serve as a guide for the authorities concerned, to ensure that the means are provided to adequately manage patients with endometriosis.

The Collège national des gynécologues obstétriciens français (CNGOF), in agreement with the Société de chirurgie gynécologique et pelvienne (SCGP), has set up a commission in 2017 to define endometriosis expert centres, with the aim of optimizing endometriosis care in France.The committee included members from university and general hospitals as well as private facilities, representing medical, surgical and radiological aspects of endometriosis care. Opinion of endometriosis patients' associations was obtained prior to writing this work. The final text was presented and unanimously validated by the members of the CNGOF Board of Directors at its meeting of October 13, 2017.Based on analysis of current management of endometriosis and the last ten years opportunities in France, the committee has been able to define the contours of endometriosis expert centres. The objectives, production specifications, mode of operation, missions and funding for these centres were described. The following missions have been specifically defined: territorial organization, global and referral care, communication and teaching as well as research and evaluation.Because of its daily impact for women and its economic burden in France, endometriosis justifies launching of expert centres throughout the country with formal accreditation by health authorities, ideally as part of the National Health Plan.

The aim of this study was to describe the use of laparoscopy in gynecologic malignancies (cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancer, borderline included) in France during year 2005.We have carried out a retrospective national practice survey during 12 months. Each university hospital (45 centers) and each cancer center (20 centers) received a questionnaire to evaluate their practice in laparoscopy. Centers performing less than ten cases per year in this indication were excluded.Among 65 centers, 31 answered and 19 were included. A total of 1397 surgical procedures for gynaecologic cancer was analysed. Laparoscopy was performed in 714 cases. In these cases, 51.1% (675 cases) of patients were treated by laparoscopy in France during year 2005. Seventy-four surgical procedures for cancer were performed each year per center and among them 38 by laparoscopy. The average cases number is 9.4 per surgeon.We found that 51.1% of cases of gynaecologic cancer surgery were performed by laparoscopy in France during 2005, representing 38 cases per centers and 9.4 per surgeon per year. This suggests that access to training for surgeons and care for patients is difficult.

We describe a rare case of fistula between the Wirsung duct and the right psoas muscle. The initial clinical presentation was localised in the thigh and successful treatment was achieved by exclusive mini-invasive techniques.