Search

Summary: Background: Ruptured juxtarenal aortic aneurysms (RJAAA) represent a special challenge in clinical practice, but the evidence to guide therapeutic decision-making is scarce. The aim of this study was to present two different approaches, open surgical (OAR) and chimney endovascular repair (CHEVAR), for treating patients with RJAAA. Patients and methods: This retrospective two-center study included all patients per center undergoing OAR or CHEVAR for RJAAA between February 2008 and January 2020. Juxtarenal aortic aneurysms were defined as having an infrarenal neck of 2–5 mm, measured after three-dimensional reconstruction of the computed tomography angiography scan. Results: 12 OAR patients (10 male, median age 73 years [58–90 years]) and 6 CHEVAR patients (all male, median age 74 years [59–83 years]) were included. In the OAR group, the proximal aortic clamping was suprarenal in 7 and interrenal in 5 patients. Cold renal perfusion was used in 4 patients, in 2 with suprarenal aortic clamping and in 2 with interrenal aortic clamping. 3 CHEVAR patients received a single renal chimney, the other 3 received double renal chimneys. Technical success was 12/12 in the OAR group 5/6 in the CHEVAR group. In-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality were 3/12 after OAR and 0/6 after CHEVAR. 2 OAR patients required transient dialysis. Median in-hospital stay was 14 (10–63) and 8 (6–21) days and median follow-up (FU) was 20 (3–37) and 30 (7–101) months, respectively. No further deaths occurred during FU. One OAR patient and 4 CHEVAR patients required aortic reinterventions. Conclusions: RJAAAs are rare. Both OAR and CHEVAR can represent adequate treatments for RJAAAs. OAR is the traditional approach, but CHEVAR has - in a high-volume center - promising early results with nonetheless a need for continuous FU to prevent reinterventions. Defining the studied aortic pathology precisely is essential for future research in order to draw valid conclusions.

Background/Objective To evaluate the safety and utility of a new in Europe intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) catheter in a case of peripheral arterial disease caused by in-stent restenosis of the superficial femoral artery. Method Pre-therapeutic computed tomographic angiography identified severe stent restenosis related to device underexpansion, which was caused by an underlying eccentric severely calcified stenosis leading to suboptimal device deployment. The OptiCross 18 (30 MHz Peripheral Imaging Catheter, Boston Scientific, USA) is a short rail imaging catheter. It consists of two main assemblies: The imaging core is composed of a hi-torque, flexible, rotating drive cable with a radial looking 30 MHz ultrasonic transducer at the distal tip. An electro-mechanical connector interface at the proximal end of the catheter makes the connection to the Motordrive Unit (MDU5 PLUSTM) Instrument. The MDU5 PLUS-catheter interface consists of an integrated mechanical drive socket and electrical connection. Results The use of the IVUS-guided imaging revealed in-stent restenosis, fracture, and protrusion of the calcified plaque in the stent and confirmed the preoperative computed tomography angiography which showed stent compression. Use of intravascular litotripsy catheter (intravascular lithotripsy Shockwave Medical, Santa Clara, California) and drug coated balloon led to improvement in stent expansion, having minimal patent diameter of 5.77 mm. The patient’s subsequent clinical course was uneventful, and clinically had palpable pulses in the foot and ankle-brachial index of 1. Conclusions Whether acoustic pulse application might affect device structure in the long term remains to be determined, use of the novel IVUS system demonstrated excellent visibility of the etiology of the in-stent restenosis improving the perioperative diagnostic modalities of suboptimal endovascular outcome.

Objectives Endovascular therapy using balloon expandable stents has become the treatment standard for most iliac atherosclerotic lesions. We aimed to assess the safety and performance of the Dynamic stainless-steel balloon-expanding stent system in this location. Methods BIODYNAMIC is a retrospective single center study including consecutive patients with iliac lesions treated with the Dynamic stent system. Not included were implantations inside an endograft. The primary endpoint was freedom from major adverse limb events (MALE) at 12 months, defined as index limb amputation or target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary endpoints were procedure success, ankle brachial index (ABI) and Rutherford class change, mortality and freedom from TLR after 12 months. Results Within two years, 182 patients with 234 lesions in the common iliac artery were enrolled. Rutherford class 5 and 6 were present in 11.5% of patients, average stent diameter was 8.0 ± 0.5 mm and stented length 40.0 ± 15.3 mm. The primary endpoint was reached in 96.2% (225/234) of the cases, with six TLR (2.6%) and three target limb amputations (1.3%). Procedure success was obtained in all but three patients (98.4%). In paired analysis, ABI improved by 0.25 ± 0.21 from baseline to 0.90 ± 0.16 post-procedure and Rutherford class improved by −1.75 ± 1.53. There were four non-device–related deaths (2.2%). Freedom from TLR was 97%, 95.3%, 94% and 92.7% at 24, 36, 48 and 60 months, respectively. Conclusion The Dynamic balloon-expandable stent system proved to be safe and effective in a population with common iliac artery lesions.

Purpose: To evaluate if the elderly could benefit from the implantation of iliac branch devices (IBDs) to preserve the patency of the internal iliac artery (IIA) in aneurysms involving the iliac bifurcation. Materials and Methods: From January 2005 to April 2017, 804 patients enrolled in the pELVIS registry underwent endovascular aneurysm repair with 910 IBDs due to aneurysmal involvement of the iliac bifurcation. Among the 804 patients, 157 (19.5%) were octogenarians (mean age 82.9±2.5 years; 157 men) with 171 target IIAs for preservation. Outcomes at 30 days included technical success, death, conversion to open surgery, and major complications. Outcomes evaluated in follow-up were patency of the IBD and target vessels, type I and type III endoleaks, aneurysm-related reinterventions, aneurysm-related death, and overall patient survival. Kaplan-Meier analyses were employed to evaluate the late outcome measures; the estimates are presented with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Technical success was 99.4% with no intraoperative conversions or deaths (1 bridging stent could not be implanted, and the IIA was sacrificed). Perioperative mortality was 1.9%. The overall perioperative aneurysm-related complication rate was 8.9% (14/157), with an early reintervention rate of 5.1% (8/157). Median postoperative radiological and clinical follow-up were 21.8 months (range 1–127) and 29.3 months (range 1–127), respectively. Estimated rates of freedom from occlusion of the IBD, the IIA, and the external iliac artery at 60 months were 97.7% (95% CI 96.1% to 99.3%), 97.3% (95% CI 95.7% to 98.9%), and 98.6% (95% CI 97% to 99.9%), respectively. Estimated rates of freedom from type I and type III endoleaks and device migration at 60 months were 90.9% (95% CI 87% to 94.3%), 98.7% (95% CI 97.5% to 99.8%), and 98% (95% CI 96.4% to 99.6%), respectively. Freedom from all cause reintervention at 60 months was 87.4% (95% CI 82.6% to 92.2%). The estimated overall survival rate at 60 months was 59% (95% CI 52.4% to 65.6%). Conclusion: IBD implantation in octogenarians provided acceptable perioperative mortality and morbidity rates, with satisfying long-term freedom from IBD-related complications and should be considered a feasible repair option for selected elderly patients affected by aneurysms involving the iliac bifurcation.

Objective Endovascular aneurysm repair has gained field over open surgery for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. However, type Ia endoleak represents a common complication especially in hostile neck anatomy that is recently faced using endoanchors. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to collect and analyse all the available comparative evidence on the outcomes of the endosuture aneurysm repair in patients with or without hostile neck in standard endovascular aneurysm repair. Methods The current meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All the prospective and retrospective studies reporting primary use of the Heli-FX EndoAnchor implants were considered eligible for inclusion in this study. The main study outcomes (technical success of endoanchor implantation, incidence of type Ia endoleak, aortic stent graft migration and the percentage of patients who presented regression or expansion of aneurysm sac throughout the follow-up) were subsequently expressed as proportions and 95% confidence intervals. Results Eight studies with a total of 968 patients were included in a pooled analysis. The technical success of the primary endoanchor fixation was 97.12% (95%CI: 92.98–99.67). During a mean six months follow-up period, a pooled rate of 6.23% (95%CI: 0.83–15.25) of the patients developed a persistent type Ia endoleak despite the primary implantation. Migration of the main graft was reported in five studies, in which a 0.26% (95%CI = 0.00–1.54) of the patients required an additional proximal aortic cuff. Regression of the aneurysm sac was observed at 68.82% (95%CI: 51.02–84.21). An expansion of the aneurysm sac was found in 1.93% (95%CI: 0.91–3.24) of the participants. The overall survival rate was 93.43% (95%CI: 89.97–96.29) at a mean six months follow-up period. Conclusions Endosuture aneurysm repair with the Heli-FX EndoAnchor implants seems to be technically feasible and safe either for prevention or for repair of intraoperative type Ia endoleak. Despite the primary implants of endoanchors, few cases of persistent type Ia endoleak and migration are still conspicuous. Long-term follow up is needed to determinate the role of this therapeutic option in the treatment of aortic aneurysms.

Objective Recent guidelines recognize the role of chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (ChEVAR) in the treatment of complex aortic disorders. The optimal configuration and number of visceral vessels that can be incorporated is still controversial. We aim to review outcomes from a multi-institutional decade-long experience with ChEVAR. Methods Patients undergoing ChEVAR with multiple (≥2) chimney branches were selected from a prospectively maintained database at the two academic university hospitals. All patients were poorly suited for fenestrated or branched endograft repair (F/BEVAR) and deemed poor-risk for open surgery. Results Forty-nine multiple ChEVAR were performed in 44 men and 5 women, with complete outcome data at a mean follow-up of 18 months. Overall, 2 patients died during follow-up (4%) with no aneurysm-related mortality and two ruptures after ChEVAR (4.1%) due to a type Ib endoleak from iliac limb pullout and persistent gutter-flow, both repaired with endovascular means. No stroke or spinal cord ischemia was noted during the follow-up period. Reintervention was undertaken in eight patients (16.3%) with five reinterventions for persistent gutter-flow and four chimney graft-associated. Three-vessel ChEVAR was performed in 16 patients, with two-vessel ChEVAR in 33 patients for a total of 114 chimney branches (mean 2.3 chimneys per patient). There were 21 superior mesenteric artery (SMA), 45 right renal, 46 left renal artery (LRA), and two accessory LRA chimneys placed. Antegrade configuration of chimney branches was chosen in 43 patients (88%). There were no significant differences between three-vessel and two-vessel ChEVAR upon univariate analysis in aneurysm size (65.6 vs 60.5 mm; p = 0.059), iliac diameter (7.3 vs 7.1 mm; p = 0.85), or endograft oversizing (30 vs 32.5%; p = 0.43). Three-vessel ChEVAR was associated with a larger aneurysm neck diameter (28.4 vs 25.0 mm; p = 0.021), shorter native infrarenal neck (0.5 vs 3.37 mm; p = 0.002) as well as longer seal zone (36.33 vs 22.67 mm; p = 0.005) compared with two-vessel ChEVAR. At follow-up, there were no significant differences in gutter area between three-vessel and two-vessel ChEVAR (18.9 vs 15.7 mm3; p = 0.73) nor the rate of persistent gutter-flow (12.5 vs 9.1%; p = 0.71). Conclusion Reintervention to multiple chimney grafts and for persistent gutter-flow is higher compared to single chimneys and demands close surveillance. However, based upon this combined transantlantic experience, we believe multiple ChEVAR provides a reasonable and safe option for complex aortic aneurysm repair when open or custom endografts are not available or indicated based on their Instructions For use, even when triple chimney grafts are required. The optimal configuration for multiple ChEVAR still warrants further study, although theoretical preliminary advantages may exist for a combination of antegrade and retrograde chimneys.

There appears to be an association between paclitaxel-coated devices and increased 5-year all-cause mortality.We are conducting a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center, noninferiority study. All consecutive patients with femoropopliteal arterial disease who fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria are sequentially and consecutively assigned to either paclitaxel (Ranger, Boston Scientific) or sirolimus (MagicTouch, Concept Medical) coated balloon angioplasty treatment. The primary outcome are procedural success and primary vessel patency at index procedure. The secondary outcomes are 30-day and 12-month freedom from MAEs (amputation, death, TLR/TVR, MI, distal embolization that requires a separate intervention or hospitalization), procedural success (≤30% residual diameter stenosis or occlusion after the procedure), Rutherford category improvement (reduction ≤1 category) and ABI improvement (increase ≥0.10 from baseline).A total of six patients have been enrolled in the present study up to now. The mean age was 72.6 years old and five were male. All patients had angiographic evidence of isolated occlusion in the transition segment of the distal femoral superficial artery in the popliteal artery. The mean length was 109 mm. Three patients were treated by sirolimus-coated (group A) and three by paclitaxel coated balloon angioplasty (group B). The primary patency and procedural success was in two of three and three of three patients, for group A and B, respectively.Preliminary results show safety and feasibility of the Sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty. Further investigation and increase of sample size will allow for more sustained conclusions regarding patency and procedural success of this type of balloons for the endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease.

The purpose of this study was to define patient and anatomical factors associated with technical results specific to rotational atherectomy. Controversy exists surrounding appropriate utilization of atherectomy to treat femoral-popliteal atherosclerosis. Importantly, the existence of different atherectomy devices and lack of technical reports highlighting variables that impact outcomes obscures the ability to assess perioperative performance.The nonindustry sponsored, Multicentric National Registry on the use of rotational atherectomy in femoral-popliteal occlusive atherosclerotic disease (MORPHEAS) database was queried. The MORPHEAS investigators included experienced providers at four centers who previously had not utilized rotational atherectomy. The primary endpoint was flow-limiting dissection and/or50% recoil resulting in stent-placement while a secondary endpoint included peripheral thromboembolism incidence.One hundred thirteen patients were enrolled. Only femoropopliteal occlusions were included in the analysis and anatomic distribution and calcification severity were depicted separately. The most common adjunctive therapy was drug-coated balloon angioplasty (84%; N.=96). Flow-limiting dissection was identified in 16% (N.=18) and thromboembolism occurred in 4% (N.=4). Diabetes increased risk of thromboembolism (P=0.03) while lesion length ≥8.0 cm (P=0.07) and SFA-popliteal adductor canal location (P=0.01) were associated with flow-limiting dissection. In multivariable analysis, SFA-popliteal adductor canal occlusion had a 4.7-fold risk of perioperative complications (OR=4.7, 95%CI: 1.1-21.0; P=0.04).Rotational atherectomy was characterized by reproducible performance among four centers; however, diabetic patients, as well as those with long-segment, heavily calcified SFA-popliteal adductor canal occlusion present greatest risk of complications.

Purpose Chimney endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (CHEVAR) has predominantly been described as an alternative technique for the management of urgent presentations of degenerative pararenal aortic aneurysms (dPAAs). However, the role of CHEVAR in the treatment of asymptomatic patients remains unknown. The aim of current multinational study was to evaluate the outcomes of elective CHEVAR of dPAAs. Material and Methods Retrospective analysis of 267 consecutive dPAA patients treated with elective CHEVAR at 13 European and US centers from 2008 to 2014. Primary endpoints were 30 days and out of hospital CHEVAR-related mortality. Secondary endpoints included persistent type Ia endoleak or endotension, angiographically confirmed occlusion and/or high-grade chimney graft (CG) or involved splanchnic vessel stenosis identified at index procedure and/or during follow-up, as well as CHEVAR-related re-intervention. Results Mean follow-up time was 25.5±13.3 months. The 442 visceral vessels were involved and mean number of CGs per patient was 1.63±0.7. 436 targeted vessels were successfully cannulated. The aortic graft intentionally covered 6 renal arteries and immediate technical success was 98.6%. The 30 days mortality was 1.9% (n=5), while the in-hospital complication rate was 10.1% (n=27) including 3 strokes, 1 permanent dialysis, and 1 intestinal ischemia. No 30 day type Ia endoleaks were detected and 3.2% of CGs (n=14, including the intentionally covered) had evidence of occlusion and/or stenosis. The overall CHEVAR-related mortality was 2.2% (n=6). Freedom from primary and secondary type Ia endoleak/endotension rates at 3 years was 93.0% and 98.0%, respectively. Primary and secondary CG patency was 87.0% and 89.0%. Primary and secondary endovascular freedom from any endpoint at 3 years was 81.0% and 94.0% respectively. Conclusion Elective use of CHEVAR in the management of dPAAs seems to be durable. These results are comparable to published outcomes with other total endovascular strategies, which justifies an expanded role for CHEVAR in the treatment of asymptomatic patients presenting with dPAAs.

Purpose: To compare balloon-expandable covered stents (BECS) available for use as renal chimney grafts to the Advanta V12 approved for use with the Endurant endograft. Materials and Methods: A silicone model was manufactured based on preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans of a patient with a 7-cm juxtarenal aneurysm treated with an Endurant bifurcated endograft and an Advanta V12 covered stent for the 6-mm-diameter right renal artery. The model was placed in a flow box filled with a 37°C blood-mimicking solution equipped with a pulsatile pumping system (140/60 mm Hg). The tested BECS were the Advanta V12, the VBX, and the BeGraft+. A 36-mm-diameter Endurant II endograft with a 16-mm-diameter contralateral limb and a 6×59-mm BECS chimney graft were used in 9 consecutive tests (3 for each combination). After each implantation, the model was placed in the CT scanner, and 2 radiologists blinded to the test device independently measured the gutter areas and the patent chimney graft lumen at the level of the Endurant’s suprarenal stent, at the level of the chimney’s maximum curvature, and 10 mm inside the renal artery. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess interreader reliability. Results: The mean gutter areas were 19.3±7, 20.2±8, and 22.3±8 mm2 for the Advanta, VBX, and BeGraft+, respectively (all p>0.05). At the level of the aortic endograft’s suprarenal stent struts, the mean diameter of the Advanta V12, VBX, and BeGraft+ were 4.46±0.3, 4.12±0.4, and 4.12±0.3 mm, respectively (all p>0.05). At the level of the maximum chimney graft angulation, the mean diameters were 3.77±0.3, 4.16±0.1, and 3.74±0.3 mm, respectively (all p>0.05). In the right renal artery, the mean diameters were 3.91±0.2, 4.05±0.9, and 4.3±0.4 mm, respectively (all p>0.05). The ICCs varied between 0.7 and 0.9, indicating good agreement between readers. Conclusion: These in vitro findings showed comparable results between the Advanta V12 and the available BECS used in conjunction with the Endurant endograft according to the instructions for use. Further clinical evaluation is needed to confirm these results.

Objectives Leriche syndrome, defined as a chronic obliteration of a segment of the infrarenal aorta and the iliac arteries, represents a challenging pathology. Surgical reconstruction represents the standard treatment option. However, the endovascular therapy is gaining ever greater applicability in several vascular territories comparable with the open repair results. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of endovascular repair in patients with chronic Leriche syndrome. Methods Between January 2008 and September 2016, 82 patients with Leriche syndrome underwent surgical and endovascular repair at two European vascular centers. After risk stratification, 40 patients were matched based on chronic TASC D obstructive arterial disease with involvement of the aortic bifurcation and bilateral iliac arteries, the age, and the cardiovascular risk factors identifying finally 20 patients who underwent surgical repair (open group) and 20 patients who were treated by deployment of stents/stent-grafts in the aortic and iliac segment (endo group). Kaplan–Meier estimation for patency and freedom from reintervention were calculated and univariate analyses were performed. Results Estimated primary patency rate was 100% vs. 84% at one year for the open group vs. endovascular group, respectively ( p = .05). Freedom from reintervention was 100% vs. 89% at one year for the open group vs. endo group ( p = .09). During the entire follow-up of 34.9 ± 23.1 months, five reinterventions were performed for the endo group vs. two for the open group ( p = .212). Additionally, the major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were 5/20 vs. 2/20 for the endovascular vs. open group, respectively ( p = .212). The postoperative ankle–brachial index improved in 0.66 in the endo group vs. 0.71 in the open group ( p = .624). Conclusions Endovascular techniques for the treatment of complex chronic Leriche lesions seem not to be associated with better early or mid-term outcomes compared to surgical repair.

Objective Data in literature suggest iliac artery dilatation and endograft retraction as complications after endovascular aneurysm repair. However, mainly older generation endografts were included. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the distal sealing zone chronological changes after endovascular aneurysm repair with newer generation stent-grafts. Methods Clinical and radiological data of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with endovascular aneurysm repair between January 2010 and December 2013 were reviewed. Measurements were made using volumetric reconstructions in the first and last available computed tomography angiography. Endpoints of the study were the presence of iliac dilatation and retraction of the endograft. Association with distal oversizing and sealing length was analyzed. Results Consecutive patients with a total of 52 common iliac arteries were included in the study (mean age 74.9 ± 6.8 years, four women (7.7%)). The mean follow-up was 3.1 years. The mean iliac diameter increased from 15.5 to 17.1 mm ( p Conclusion Iliac dilatation and endograft limb retraction are common findings after endovascular aneurysm repair despite the use of new generation endografts. Optimizing the iliac sealing length and meticulous computed tomography angiography surveillance are recommended especially in case of use ≥24 mm iliac stent-grafts to prevent possible complications.

Objectives To collect and analyse the available evidence in the outcomes of patients treated with fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (f-EVAR) technique focusing specifically on visceral vessel outcomes. Methods The current meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All the studies reporting the f-EVAR technique for the management of degenerative pararenal and/or type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) were considered eligible for inclusion in the study. The main study outcomes (technical success, type I endoleaks, fracture or occlusion of the bridging stents, overall aneurysm-related mortality, and the reintervention rate) were subsequently expressed as proportions and 95% confidence intervals. Results Fourteen studies with a total of 1804 patients were included in a pooled analysis. The technical success of the procedure was 95.97% (95%CI = 92.35–98.60). Intraoperatively, the pooled proportion of reported type I endoleak was 7.6% (95%CI = 2.52–14.60) while during a median follow-up of 41 months (range 11–96) follow-up period the pooled rate of fracture and occlusion of the bridging stents was 2.79% (95%CI = 0.00–8.52) and 4.46% (95%CI = 1.93–7.77), respectively. The overall aneurysm-related mortality was detected to be 0.63% (95%CI = 0.04–1.63), and the pooled estimate for re-intervention rate was 15.69%. Conclusions Fenestrated endovascular repair for p-AAA is an effective and safe treatment. Target vessel complications and endoleaks remain the two most important concerns for fenestrated endovascular procedures, contributing to most of the secondary interventions. The lack of computed tomography angiography follow-up evaluation does not allow us to draw robust conclusions about the complication rates for the superior mesenteric artery during f-EVAR. Due to the potential implications of SMA complications on aneurysm-related mortality, standardized reporting of short- and long-term target visceral vessel outcomes is required.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to present a narrative review on endovascular techniques (ET) for revascularization of the left subclavian artery (LSA) during zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and on risk factors for postoperative stroke following TEVAR procedures. METHODS Non-systematic search of the literature from the PubMed, Ovid and Scopus databases to identify relevant English-language articles fully published in the period 1 January 2010–1 August 2020. RESULTS Current general agreement is that LSA revascularization should be always attempted in the elective setting. Under urgent circumstances, it can be delayed but might be considered during the same session on a case-by-case basis. Three ET are currently available: (i) chimney/snorkels (also known as parallel grafts), (ii) fenestrations or branches and (iii) proximal scallops. The main issue with ET is the potential for increased peri-operative stroke risk owing to increased manipulation within the aortic arch. Also, they are relatively novel and further assessment of their long-term durability is needed. Intra-operative embolism and loss of left vertebral artery perfusion are hypothesized as the main causes of stroke in patients undergoing TEVAR. CONCLUSIONS The overall risk of stroke seems higher without LSA revascularization during zone 2 TEVAR. As LSA revascularization might have a direct effect in preventing posterior stroke, it should be routinely performed in elective cases, while a case-by-case evaluation can be made under urgent circumstances. While ET can provide effective options for LSA revascularization during zone 2 TEVAR, they are novel and need further durability assessment. Stroke after TEVAR is a multifactorial pathological process and preventing TEVAR-related cerebral injury remains a significant unmet clinical need.

Objective In the treatment of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms and aortic pathologic processes, chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (CHEVAR) represents an alternative technique for urgent cases. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of CHEVAR in the elective setting. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected records of 165 consecutive asymptomatic CHEVAR patients who were treated between March 2009 and January 2018 with the Endurant stent graft (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Calif). A total of 244 chimney grafts (CGs) were implanted. The primary end point was clinical success, defined as freedom from procedure-related mortality, persistent type IA endoleak, occlusion or high-grade stenosis (>70%) of CGs, and any chimney technique-related secondary procedure for the entire follow-up period. Secondary clinical success included patients with successful treatment of a primary end point with a secondary endovascular procedure. Results All 244 targeted chimney vessels were successfully cannulated. Total perioperative morbidity was 7.8% (n = 13), including 3 (1.8%) cases of bowel ischemia, 1 (0.6%) patient with renal ischemia, and 1 patient (0.6%) with stroke. Median follow-up was 25.5 ± 2.2 months. Both 30-day and follow-up procedure-related mortality rates were 1.8% (n = 3). Primary and secondary freedom from persistent type IA endoleak rates were 96.4% (n = 159) and 99.4% (n = 164), respectively. Primary and secondary CG patency rates were 92.2% (n = 225) and 95.9% (n = 234), respectively. The rate of reinterventions related to the chimney technique was 10.9% (n = 18), and 83.3% of them were performed by endovascular means. The estimated cumulative primary patency and freedom from persistent type IA endoleak were 87.5% and 95.3%, respectively, and the primary and secondary clinical successes rates at midterm were 80.3% and 87.5%, respectively. Conclusions The elective use of CHEVAR with the Endurant stent graft in our series showed favorable midterm clinical results, which are similar to the published results of other total endovascular modalities. A prospective randomized trial of elective treatment of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms and aortic pathologic processes with current endovascular options is needed to assess the value of CHEVAR in the elective setting.

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of iliac branch devices (IBD) used in combination with standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) vs with fenestrated/branched EVAR (f/bEVAR) to treat complex aortoiliac aneurysms. Materials and Methods: The pELVIS Registry database containing the outcomes of IBD use at 8 European centers was interrogated to identify all IBD procedures that were combined with either standard EVAR or f/bEVAR. Among 669 patients extracted from the database, 629 (mean age 72.1±8.8 years; 597 men) had received an IBD combined with standard EVAR vs 40 (mean age 71.1±8.0 years; 40 men) who underwent f/bEVAR with an IBD. The mean aortic aneurysm diameters were 46.4±13.3 mm in the f/bEVAR patients vs 45.0±15.5 mm in the standard EVAR cases. The groups were similar in terms of baseline clinical characteristics and aneurysm morphology. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare patient survival, IBD occlusion, type III endoleak, and aneurysm-related reinterventions in follow-up. The estimates are presented with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Technical success was 100% in the f/bEVAR+IBD group and 99% in the EVAR+IBD group (p=0.85). The 30-day mortality was 0% vs 0.5%, respectively (p=0.66), while the 30-day reintervention rates were 7.5% vs 4.1% (p=0.31). The mean follow-up was 32.1±21.3 months for f/bEVAR+IBD patients (n=30) and 35.5±26.8 months for EVAR+IBD patients (n=571; p=0.41). The 12-month survival estimates were 93.4% (95% CI 93.2% to 93.6%) in the EVAR+IBD group vs 93.6% (95% CI 93.3% to 93.9%) for the f/bEVAR+IBD group (p=0.93). There were no occlusions or type III endoleaks in the f/bEVAR+IBD group at 12 months, while the estimates for freedom from occlusion and from type III endoleak in the EVAR+IBD group were 97% (95% CI 96.8% to 97.2%) and 98.5% (95% CI 98.4% to 98.6%), respectively. The 12-month estimates for freedom for aneurysm-related reintervention were 93% (95% CI 92.7% to 93.3%) in the EVAR+IBD group vs 86.4% (95% CI 85.9% to 86.9%) in the f/bEVAR+IBD patients (p=0.046). Conclusion: Treatment of complex aortoiliac disease with f/bEVAR+IBD can achieve equally good early and 1-year outcomes compared to treatment with IBDs and standard bifurcated stent-grafts, except for a somewhat higher reintervention rate in f/bEVAR patients.

The early and short-term efficacy of the snorkel/chimney technique for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (ch-EVAR) have been previously reported. However, long-term ch-EVAR performance, vessel patency, and patient survival remain unknown. Our study evaluated the late outcomes to identify possible predictors of failure within the PERICLES (performance of the chimney technique for the treatment of complex aortic pathologies) registry.Clinical and radiographic data from patients who had undergone ch-EVAR from 2008 to 2014 in the PERICLES registry were updated with an extension of the follow-up. Regression models were used to evaluate the relevant anatomic and operative characteristics as factors influencing the late results. We focused on patients with ≥30 months of follow-up (mean, 46.6 months; range, 30-120 months).A total of 517 patients from the initial PERICLES registry were included in the present analysis, from which the mean follow-up was updated from 17.1 months to 28.2 months (range, 1-120 months). All-cause mortality at the latest follow-up was 25.5% (n = 132), with an estimated patient survival of 87.6%, 74.4%, and 66.1% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. A subgroup of 244 patients with 387 chimney grafts placed (335 renal arteries, 42 superior mesenteric arteries, 10 celiac arteries) and follow-up for ≥30 months was used to analyze specific anatomic and device predictors of adverse events. In the subgroup, the technical success was 88.9%, and the primary patency was 94%, 92.8%, 92%, and 90.5% at 2.5, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. The mean aneurysm sac regression was 7.8 ± 11.4 mm (P .0001). Chimney graft occlusion had occurred in 24 target vessels (6.2%). Late open conversion was required in 5 patients for endograft infection in 2, persistent type Ia endoleak in 2, and endotension in 1 patient. The absence of an infrarenal neck (odds ratio, 2.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-6.19; P = .007) was significantly associated with long-term device-related complications. A sealing zone diameter30 mm was significantly associated with persistent or late type Ia endoleak (odds ratio, 4.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-16.59; P = .012).The present analysis of the PERICLES registry has provided the missing long-term experience for the ch-EVAR technique, showing favorable results with more than one half of the patients surviving for5 years and a chimney graft branch vessel patency of 92%. The absence of an infrarenal neck and treatment with a sealing zone diameter30 mm were the main anatomic long-term limits of the technique, requiring adequate preoperative planning and determination of the appropriate indication.

Background: The prevailing evidence calls for using chimney/snorkel endovascular repair (ch-EVAR) with one or two chimney grafts. No studies up to now focus on its applicability and results for the treatment of suprarenal aortic pathologies (SRAP). Hence, we evaluated the clinical and radiologic results of ch-EVAR treatment for SRAP placing three or more chimney grafts within the PERICLES Registry. Methods: Data from 517 patients suffering complex aortic pathologies treated by ch-EVAR between 2008 and 2014 at 13 European and U.S. centers were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Results: Sixty-seven ch-EVAR-treated patients (12.9% of the entire PERICLES cohort) presented SRAP (83.5% elective, 16.5% urgent). The majority of patients (95.5%) received three chimney grafts; four patients received four chimney grafts. The Endurant device was the most commonly used (35.8%) followed by the Zenith abdominal endograft (19.4%). Overall, 204 chimney grafts were placed (56.7% covered self-expandable, 40.3% covered balloon-expandable stents, and 10.4% bare metal balloon-expandable stents). At a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 0.1-67.0 days), 30-day mortality was 6.1% (4 patients), and the overall mortality was 16.4% (11 patients). Overall survival was 87.4% (range, 79.5%-96.0%) at 1 year, 81.8% (range, 72.2%-92.2%) at 2 years and thereafter. Type IA endoleak was noted in nine patients (13.4%) intraoperatively and successfully treated in seven cases (97.1% technical success). Aneurysm sac diameter significantly decreased from 70.5 ± 19.3 mm to 66.9 ± 20.6 mm (P

Objective Gender-related differences in outcomes in complex endovascular aortic repair have not been profoundly investigated. Use of low profile abdominal devices as in chimney endovascular repair may be beneficial for female patients with pararenal pathologies. With the chimney technique, there is no need for large introduction sheaths. This could be an advantage in case of smaller in diameter iliac access especially in combination with stenosis or elongation. Aim of the present study was to compare the perioperative and mid-term outcomes between males and females patients treated with the chimney/snorkel technique for pararenal aortic pathologies. Methods The PERICLES registry collected the world wide experience with the chimney technique. According to the gender, patients were classified in two cohorts. Primary endpoints were freedom from occlusion of the chimney grafts and reintervention. Secondary endpoints included access site complications and need for surgical or interventional revision, Endoleak Type I rate, 30-day overall complications and mortality. Univariate comparison P-values were generated using either the likelihood ratio χ2 test, the Fisher exact test, the Wilcoxon rank sum test, or the log rank test. Kaplan–Meier curves estimated the outcomes in the long run. Results A total of 412 patients underwent Ch-EVAR, 71 (17%) females and 341 (83%) males with a mean age for both groups being 74 years were included in the present study. After 36 months of mean follow-up, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two cohorts regarding re-interventions ( P= .44). Freedom from occlusion rates at 36 months did not differed between the two groups (females 84% vs. 80% for males ( P= .033). For patients receiving more than one chimney stent, the odds of having a complication did not differ between males and females (M:F OR = 2.0, 95% CI: 0.6–6.4, P = 0.228); 30-day mortality was 0% in the female group, instead five male patients died within one month. ( P = 0.59). The incidence of acute renal failure was low in both groups without statistical difference: 2 (3.1%) vs. 13 (4.6%) 58 ( P = 1.00). Neither patient received an endoconduit to insert the abdominal device. Conclusions No statistically significant difference regarding the freedom from reintervention and chimney graft patency was observed between the two genders. The results highlight the beneficial use of the chimney technique in female patients who can have potentially higher risk of access complications.

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the performance of the chimney (ch) technique in the treatment of type Ia endoleaks after standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: Between January 2008 and December 2014, 517 chEVAR procedures were performed in 13 US and European vascular centers (PERICLES registry). Thirty-nine patients (mean age 76.9±7.1 years; 33 men) were treated for persistent type Ia endoleak and had computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography follow-up at >1 month. Endurant abdominal stent-grafts were used in the 20 cases. Single chimney graft placement was performed in 18 (46%) patients and multiple in 21 (54%). Overall, 70 visceral vessels were targeted for revascularization. Results: Technical success was achieved in 35 (89.7%) cases; 3 persistent type Ia endoleaks and 1 chimney graft occlusion were detected within the first 30 days. Thirty-day mortality was 2.6%. Two other deaths (not aneurysm related) occurred during a mean follow-up of 21.9 months (0.23–71.3). Primary patency of the chimney grafts was 94.3% at 36 months. In a subgroup analysis comparing Endurant to other stent-grafts, no significant differences were observed regarding persistent endoleak [1/20 (5%) vs 2/19 (11%), p=0.6] or reintervention [1/20 (5%) vs 0/19 (0%)]. Conclusion: The present series demonstrates that chEVAR in the treatment of post-EVAR type Ia endoleaks has satisfactory results independent of the abdominal and chimney graft combinations. Midterm results show that chEVAR is an effective method for treating type Ia endoleaks.

Purpose: To evaluate the incidence and reasons for secondary procedures in patients treated with iliac branch devices (IBDs) for isolated iliac aneurysm or aortoiliac aneurysms involving the iliac bifurcation. Methods: Between January 2005 and December 2015, 575 surgical-high-risk patients (mean age 72.0±8.4 years; 558 men) with isolated iliac aneurysms (n=79) or aortoiliac aneurysms involving the iliac bifurcation (n=496) were treated with placement of 650 ZBIS or Gore IBDs (75 bilateral) in 6 European centers. The primary outcome was procedure-related reinterventions for occlusion or high-grade (>70%) stenosis of the bridging device, occlusion of the ipsilateral common or external iliac artery (EIA), type I/III endoleak, rupture, or infection following IBD implantation. Clinical and radiological data were analyzed based on preset definitions of comorbidities, aneurysm morphology, intraoperative variables, and follow-up strategies. Results: Nine (1.6%) reinterventions were performed within 30 days for occlusion or endoleak. Among 10 (1.5%) occluded EIAs ipsilateral to a deployed IBD, 6 underwent a reintervention with additional stent placement after thrombolysis (n=4) or a femorofemoral or iliofemoral crossover bypass (n=2). Three of 14 patients with early type I endoleak had a reintervention for an insufficient proximal sealing zone (stent-grafts in 2 common iliac arteries and 1 bifurcated endograft). Mean clinical and radiological follow-up were 32.6±9.9 and 29.8±21.1 months, respectively. Forty-two (7.3%) patients underwent reinterventions in the follow-up period. The overall postoperative reintervention rate was 8.9%. Both external and common iliac segments occluded in 30 (4.6%) IBDs; 2 patients had a crossover bypass and 14 were treated with endovascular techniques. In the other 14 patients, no specific treatment was performed. Seven (1.2%) patients with isolated EIA occlusion were treated during follow-up. Nineteen of the overall 28 patients with type I endoleak underwent endovascular repair. The other 9 were under radiological surveillance due to less significant (

Purpose: To examine the suitability of the Zenith off-the-shelf (p-branch) endograft in patients with juxta- or pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (J/PRAA) previously treated with endovascular aneurysm repair incorporating the chimney technique (chEVAR). Methods: Between January 2012 and December 2014, high-resolution computed tomography angiograms and clinical data from 50 patients (mean age 79 years; 45 men) with J/PRAAs treated with chEVAR were retrospectively reviewed. Primary anatomical suitability was evaluated according to the Investigational Device Exemption protocol for the Zenith p-branch endograft in a dedicated 3-dimensional vascular workstation. Secondary suitability was defined as any additional intervention needed to overcome adverse anatomical conditions at the access vessels. The Zenith p-branch endograft is available in 2 configurations (A and B), with the main difference being the distance between the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the renal fenestrations. Results: The p-branch endograft showed a primary suitability of 54% (n=27). Each configuration was suitable in 18 (36%) patients. Main anatomical limitations were the clock position of the left renal artery (LRA; n=7, 14%), the distance between the SMA and LRA (A: n=16, 32%; B: n=16, 32%), and significantly narrowed or calcified iliac arteries. If additional interventions at the access vessels were employed, a secondary suitability of 64% (n=32) could be achieved. Conclusion: In this specific group of patients treated with chEVAR, the Zenith p-branch system would be suitable in about half of the patients, which could be raised to two-thirds with ancillary access vessel procedures. A prospective clinical study is warranted to evaluate these results.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of chimney (ch-EVAR) vs. fenestrated aneurysm repair (f-EVAR) for treatment of complex abdominal aortic pathologies. Endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic pathologies with involvement of renal arteries includes use of f-EVAR as first line treatment. However, lack of availability and suitability has necessitated an alternative strategy employing parallel or snorkel/chimney grafts (ch-EVAR). METHODS Between January 2013 and January 2017, prospectively collected data of elective and symptomatic patients with complex aortic pathologies treated by single or double ch-EVAR (N.=111) or by f-EVAR with three fenestrations (N.=37) were evaluated. The primary endpoint was cost-effectiveness analysis defined as the summary of material costs, in-hospital costs and additional costs due to procedure-related reinterventions during a follow-up period averaging 37.2 months. RESULTS No differences between both groups were found in terms of demographics (P=0.32), age (P=0.058) and hospital stay at initial procedure (P=0.956). Index procedure and hospitalization median costs were € 22,171 for ch-EVAR and € 42,116 for f-EVAR, respectively (P

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term mortality of patients treated by the IN.PACT Admiral (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty (PCBA) compared with standard plain balloon angioplasty (POBA). Between January 2013 and January 2014, 238 patients met the inclusion criteria. A two-step analysis was performed. In step 1, the 5-year mortality of the whole patient population was evaluated regardless of possible differences in the patient demographics. In step 2, a matched paired analysis was performed using propensity scores. In addition, for those patients who were treated with PCBA, a possible correlation between dose of paclitaxel and mortality was evaluated. Univariate analysis for the whole group of patients (POBA group A, n = 84 and PCBA group B, n = 121) showed a 5-year mortality rate of 26.2% versus 14.0%, p = 0.02, respectively. Univariate analysis of 77 pairs of propensity score-matched patients resulted in mortality of 26.0% versus 20.8%, p = 0.4, of group A and B, respectively (median follow-up of 61.7 and 61.8 months, p = 0.8, respectively). Comparison of the patients of group B who died versus those who survived showed no correlation between the dose of paclitaxel with increased mortality (p = 0.4). The 5-year findings of the present real-world study showed no increased mortality for the matched patients who underwent PCBA versus POBA. In addition, there was no correlation between mortality and the dose of paclitaxel used.

Efforts to achieve optimal seal during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) may produce partial coverage of the lowest renal artery and in some cases even occlusion. This coverage might alter the renal ostial flow, which could finally affect renal function. We sought to evaluate the incidence of renal ostium coverage and its possible effects on renal function.All patients undergoing elective EVAR with suprarenal fixation devices between January 2014, and December 2017, at our institution were identified. Patients with preoperative and postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA), as well as the preoperative, postoperative, and one year postintervention creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were included in the present study. Patients in hemodialysis, with a preoperative eGFR30 mL/min, urgent EVAR, neck adjunctive procedures, excessive aortic thrombus, or procedure-related reintervention were excluded.A total of 127 patients received EVAR for aortoiliac aneurysmatic pathologies between January 2014, and December 2017. Forty-three of them met the inclusion criteria having a median follow-up of 18.8 months (range; 12.0-53.9). Twenty-six (60.5%) patients presented at least one criterion of hostile neck condition and 23 (53.5%) had a preoperative eGFR60 mL/min. The average distance from the proximal endograft fabric to the lower renal artery was 1.5 mm (range, 0.0-6.0) while a total of 15 renal ostia (34.9%) suffered unintended partial coverage (range, 20 to 75% of the renal ostium) in the postoperative CTA. Nine of these patients (60%) had a hostile neck condition. Eight patients (18.6%) suffered significant deterioration (20% of the eGFR), 27 patients (62.8%) maintained their renal function and 8 (18.6%) presented an improvement of the eGFR in the latest available blood sample. Renal function impairment showed no significant association with renal ostium coverage (P = 0.561), hostile neck condition (P = 0.973), or the diameter of the renal artery (P = 0.835). In the subgroup analysis, patients with the eGFR 60 mL/min did not show significantly greater renal function deterioration (P = 0.568).Partial renal coverage is not an uncommon phenomenon occurring in one-third of the treated patients. However, it was not associated with renal function impairment in the early term. Further studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm our results in the long haul.

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate our preliminary experience with the use of the Endurant II short form (IIs) stent-graft in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Methods Between November 2014 and November 2015, 79 patients were consecutively treated with the Endurant IIs stent-graft at three European vascular centers. Early (30-day) results in terms of technical success, limb occlusion, major morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. Estimated 1-year outcomes in terms of survival, freedom from type I endoleak, freedom from limb occlusion, and freedom from any device-related reinterventions were assessed with Kaplan-Meyer method. Factors affecting 1-year freedom from type I endoleak were analyzed by log-rank test and by Cox regression test for multivariate analysis. Results Intraoperative technical success was achieved in all cases. Thirty-day mortality was 1.3% (one death due to cardiac failure). Early type I endoleak was detected in three patients (3.8%). During the follow-up (mean duration 6.7 months; range 1-14), two type I endoleaks resolved spontaneously. No limb occlusions or aneurysm-related reinterventions were recorded. Estimated survival, freedom from type I endoleak, freedom from limb occlusions, and freedom from any device-related reinterventions rates at 1 year were 96%, 96.6%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Adoption of chimney technique significantly affected 1-year freedom from type I endoleak (P≤0.001). Conclusions Preliminary use of the new Endurant IIs stent-graft is safe and effective in endovascular repair of AAAs (EVAR) without early limb occlusions. Further studies with larger population sizes and longer follow-up are needed to evaluate mid- and long-term results.

Aim To evaluate the performance of two different flexible devices, the balloon-expandable BeGraft stent as on-label chEVAR use with the Endurant (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, USA) stent graft compared to the self-expandable off-label employment of Viabahn (Gore Flagstaff, Arizona, USA). Methods All patients treated for pararenal aortic pathologies between 2008 and 2017 using Endurant II (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) abdominal endograft in combination with Viabahn (Gore, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) or BeGraft (Bentley, Hechingen, Germany) at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the employed chimney graft, namely Viabahn (group A) and BeGraft (group B). The primary endpoint was the incidence of type IA endoleak at one month and last follow-up. Secondary endpoints included reintervention rates, primary patency of the chimney graft, and need for additional placement of bare metal stents also known as relining. Results A total of 27 patients (mean age: 76 years) were treated with overall 47 chimney grafts. In particular, 11 patients received 21 Viabahn and 16 patients underwent placement of 26 BeGraft stents. Mean follow-up was 14.3 ± 9.0 months for group A and 13.0 ± 13.7 for group B, p = .451. The mean chimney graft length was 85.1 ± 38.9 mm for group A and 34.9 ± 9.8mm for group B ( p Conclusions Both chEVAR combinations displayed similar patency rate, showing the BeGraft-Endurant composition less need for relining and fewer one-year type IA endoleak and reintervention rates in the subgroup analysis.

The aim was to identify predictors of adequate pre-operative sizing and planning for chimney endovascular aortic repair (ChEVAR) in order to reduce the incidence of persistent type Ia endoleaks (IaELs) without influencing chimney graft (CG) patency.Consecutive patients who underwent ChEVAR between January 2009 and December 2017 at a single centre were evaluated retrospectively. Included were patients treated with one device combination (Medtronic Endurant mated with Getinge Advanta V12/iCast) and placement of single or double CG. The freedom from IaEL related re-interventions and primary CG patency was estimated by measuring aortic stent graft oversizing (OS), total neck length (TNL), and a composite parameter (L-OS: TNL [mm] + OS [%]).Seventy-three patients who underwent placement of 101 CGs (45 single, 28 double) met the inclusion criteria. The median radiological follow up was 25.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 12-48) months. Freedom from IaEL related re-intervention was achieved in 94.6% with a median OS of 38.5% (IQR 30%-44%, p = .004), TNL 19 mm (16-25 mm, p = .62), and L-OS 59 (51-65, p = .018). Primary CG patency was achieved in 95% of the cases with a median OS of 36% (29%-42%, p = .008), TNL 19 mm (15.5-26 mm, p = .91), and L-OS 57 (50-64, p = .005). By using the receiver operating characteristic curve, an optimal cut off to prevent IaEL related re-interventions was identified by an OS of 30% (p .001; L-OS 55, p = .006) and to avoid CG stenosis/occlusions by OS 42% (p .001; L-OS 65, p .001). In multivariable analysis, aortic endograft OS was the only independent parameter preventive for IaEL related re-intervention (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.99).With the Endurant-Advanta V12/iCast combination, an aortic stent graft OS of at least 30% (range 30%-42%) should be used to avoid type Ia endoleaks and likewise to ensure CG patency.

Purpose: To evaluate the totally endovascular techniques for treating complex pararenal aortic aneurysms after open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Methods: This retrospective study involved 34 men (mean age 74 years) with pararenal aortic aneurysms (22 pseudoaneurysms and 12 para-anastomotic aneurysms) that developed a median 11 years (range 4–22) after the primary surgical reconstruction. The median infrarenal neck length was 2 mm (range 0–9). Total endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) included the use of fenestrated (f-EVAR; n=17), branched (b-EVAR; n=11), combined f-EVAR/b-EVAR (n=1), and chimney (ch-EVAR; n=4) grafts and the “sandwich” technique (n=1). The primary outcome was aneurysm shrinkage >5 mm at latest follow-up. Secondary outcomes were target vessel patency, 30-day mortality, late survival, absence of type I and III endoleak, clinical success, and reintervention rate. Results: Technical success was 97% (n=33/34), while clinical success was achieved in 32 (94%) patients. The 30-day mortality was 3% (n=1/34). Mean follow-up was 23.2±16.6 months. One patient was lost to follow-up, and 1 patient underwent late open conversion for endograft infection. Six (18%) of the 33 surviving patients required a reintervention. Primary patency of the target aortic branches was 98% (109/111). Mean aneurysm diameter decreased from 64.1±10.2 to 56.7±16.9 mm (p

Background To study the performance of the chimney technique in the treatment of aortic arch pathologic conditions. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and procedural outcome data of patients undergoing endovascular treatment in the aortic arch by use of the chimney technique at four European centers between June 2002 and December 2014. The primary endpoint was technical success. The secondary endpoints were type I endoleak, 30-day mortality, stroke, primary patency of the chimney graft, and freedom from reintervention. Results Ninety-five patients were included in the study. The underlying pathologic conditions were degenerative aneurysm (n = 45, 47.4%), type B aortic dissection (n = 30, 31.6%), dissecting aneurysm (n = 6, 6.5%), penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (n = 5, 5.3%), type I endoleak after previous thoracic endovascular aortic repair (n = 6, 6.3%), and aortic embolic disease (n = 3, 3.2%). Twenty-one patients (22%) underwent arch-branch debranching before chimney graft implantation. The majority of patients were treated electively (n = 49, 51.6%). Forty-six patients (48.4%) underwent urgent placement of chimney grafts because of their symptoms (n = 25) or rupture (n = 21). Technical success was 89.5%. The 30-day mortality was 9.5% (9 patients). No aorta-related death was observed. A type Ia endoleak occurred in 10 patients (10.5%) intraoperatively, resolving spontaneously within the first 30 days in 50% of these cases. Major stroke was diagnosed in 2 patients (2%). Primary patency of the chimney grafts was 98%, and 5 patients (5.2%) required a reintervention. Conclusions The chimney technique in the aortic arch proved highly and predictably successful, with a low rate of reinterventions.

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes obtained with Endurant stent graft in the early and midterm period in the treatment of patients with narrow aortic bifurcation vs patients with standard aortic bifurcation.Data were prospectively collected from 817 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm treated between November 2007 and August 2014 with the Endurant stent graft at our center. There were 87 patients (10.6%) with a narrow aortic bifurcation (≤20 mm; NA group). The remaining 730 patients (89.4%) had a standard aortic bifurcation (SA group). Early and estimated 3-year outcomes were evaluated in these patients in terms of survival, freedom from any device-related reinterventions, and freedom from graft thrombosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses in the NA group were performed to detect possible predictors for poor outcomes.The two groups were similar in terms of demographics, preoperative diagnostic assessment, and intraoperative data. In 211 of 817 patients (25.8%), an adjunctive iliac limb stenting by balloon-expanding stents was performed. Overall, 41 patients in the NA group (47.1%) underwent iliac limb stenting, whereas an iliac stent was implanted in just 170 patients (23.3%) in the SA group (P .001). The mean follow-up was 16.3 months (range, 1-73 months). The estimated 3-year survival rate was similar between the two groups (87.2% in the NA group vs 80.8% in the SA group; P = .84). Furthermore, the estimated freedom from any device-related reinterventions was 92.9% in the NA group and 85.5% in the SA group (P = .1). Finally, the estimated 3-year freedom from graft thrombosis was 96.9% in the NA group and 94.8% in the SA group (P = .79). In the NA group at univariate and multivariate analyses, none of the examined preoperative or intraoperative factors were independent predictors of poor outcomes.Use of bifurcated Endurant stent graft, combined in almost half of the patients with narrow aortic bifurcation with additional aortoiliac stent placement, is feasible and safe. Early and midterm outcomes are similar to those obtained in non-narrow aortic bifurcation.

Objective We set out to present the late 3-year performance of total endovascular treatment of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms in octogenarians by the chimney/snorkel technique. Methods At one center, between January 2009 and December 2014, chimney/snorkel technique-endovascular aortic aneurysm repair was performed in 35 high-risk unfit-for-open-repair octogenarian patients with juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. Twenty-five patients were asymptomatic (71.4%), and 10 patients were treated in an urgent care setting. The median follow-up was 36 months (range, 1-69). The primary endpoint was the survival rate. Results Technical success was 100%. A single chimney-graft placement was performed in 22 patients (62.9%), double chimneys in 10 patients (28.6%), and triple chimneys were performed in 3 (8.5%) patients. Overall, 51 renovisceral vessels (22 right renal arteries, 23 left renal arteries, and 6 superior mesenteric arteries) were involved. The thirty-day mortality rate was 2.9% (n = 1). Early morbidity was 14.3%, predominantly due to access-related complications. Major adverse events were observed in 5.7% (n = 2) of the present cohort. No early reinterventions for endoleaks were registered. The midterm reintervention rate was 12.1% due to type Ib endoleak (n = 1), type II endoleak (n = 1), and high-grade chimney-graft stenosis (n = 2). Estimated survival was 91.9% at 1 year and 72.8% at 3 years. Freedom from reintervention at 1 and 3 years was 94% and 91%, respectively. Conclusions Juxtarenal aortic aneurysm treatment with chimney/snorkel technique-endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians is associated with low perioperative mortality and morbidity as well as acceptable midterm survival and secondary procedures.

Objective The chimney/snorkel endovascular aortic repair (ch-EVAR) is gaining ever-greater acceptance in the treatment of pararenal pathologic processes. However, the published experience includes mainly short-term clinical results with combinations of several abdominal devices and types of chimney grafts. The aim of this study was the midterm evaluation of the Endurant stent graft (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Calif) as a standard abdominal device for ch-EVAR. Methods Between January 2009 and January 2013, prospectively collected data of high-risk patients with pararenal pathologic processes who underwent ch-EVAR with placement of the Endurant abdominal device were analyzed. The chimney graft intended for use was a balloon-expandable covered stent. Main outcome measures were aneurysm sac regression and chimney graft patency. Results A total of 187 snorkel/chimney grafts were successfully placed in 128 patients (mean age, 76.6 years). The technical success was 100%. The mean preoperative proximal neck length and aneurysm size were 4.7 mm and 64.8 mm (range, 48-135 mm), respectively. The postoperative new neck length after use of chimney grafts was 18.7 ± 6.3 mm. The mean aneurysm sac decreased significantly (60.8 mm; 95% confidence interval, 2.036-7.084; P = .001) after a mean radiologic follow up of 24.6 ± 17.4 months. Thirty-day mortality and midterm mortality were 0.8% and 17.2%, respectively. Two patients (1.6%) with single chimneys presented with late new onset of type Ia endoleak and underwent additional tube and multiple chimney placement. Primary chimney graft patency was 95.7%. Freedom from chimney graft-related reinterventions was 93.1%. Conclusions Standard use of the Endurant abdominal device for ch-EVAR in >120 patients is associated with high technical success, significant aneurysm sac regression, and low incidence of secondary procedures after 2-year radiologic follow-up. These results will give significant impetus to device selection, facilitating the standardization of technique.

The objective of this study was to evaluate long-term results of self-expanding vs balloon-expandable hypogastric stent grafts in conjunction with iliac branch devices (IBDs) for aortoiliac aneurysm repair in a multicenter experience (pErformance of iLiac branch deVIces for aneurysmS involving the iliac bifurcation [pELVIS] Registry).All patients electively treated for aortoiliac aneurysm with the Cook IBD (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) in nine European centers were reviewed. Clinical and imaging data were prospectively collected in each center, and a multicenter database was created and interrogated. The primary outcome was the primary patency of the IBDs. For the purpose of this investigation, three subgroups were identified: patients receiving a hypogastric balloon-expandable stent graft (BESg); those with a self-expanding stent graft (SESg); and those with any stent graft plus relining with a bare-metal stent (RESg).Between 2005 and 2017, there were 691 patients who underwent 747 elective endovascular repairs of aortoiliac aneurysms (n = 518 [75.0%]) or isolated iliac aneurysms (n = 173 [25.0%]) with Cook IBDs (n = 56 bilateral) in nine European centers. Mean age was 72 years (range, 41-93 years); 658 (95.2%) patients were male. In 364 patients (52.7%), BESg was used; in 127 (18.4%), SESg; and in 200 (28.9%), RESg. At 30 days, there were 3 (0.4%) perioperative deaths, 3 (0.4%) technical failures, 7 (1.0%) graft thromboses, 30 (4.3%) reinterventions, and 1 (0.1%) conversion to open repair. After a mean follow-up of 32 months (range, 0-128 months), 28 (3.7%) IBD occlusions and 17 (2.3%) IBD-related endoleaks occurred. In 10 patients, iliac diameter increased5 mm (1.4%). Overall primary patency was 99.2% at 1 month, 97.9% at 12 months, and 95.1% at 72 months. Primary patency was not significantly different in the BESg vs SESg or RESg cohorts (P = .4). During follow-up, there were 126 (18.2%) reinterventions, 93 (13.5%) of which were IBD related, including 11 (1.6%) conversions. Overall, freedom from reintervention and conversion was 90.4% at 12 months and 71.0% at 72 months. IBD-related reinterventions during follow-up in the three cohorts were not significantly different (P = .3) Overall survival was 71.3% at 72 months without differences between the subgroups. At multivariate analysis, aneurysmal hypogastric artery (P .001; Exp [B] = 4.44) and bilateral treatment (P = .02; Exp [B] = 1.87) were associated with an increase in late failure.In this wide real-world experience, long-term results of endovascular treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms with the IBD are favorable, with a low rate of late graft occlusion and aneurysm-related death. No significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed in patients receiving hypogastric BESg vs SESg or endovascular relining.

Background Our objective was to investigate whether patients undergoing standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) outside the instructions for use (IFU) have worse outcomes than patients treated within IFU. Methods We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Electronic bibliographic sources were searched up to January 2019 using a combination of controlled vocabulary (thesaurus) and free-text terms to identify studies comparing outcomes of EVAR in patients treated outside versus within IFU. Pooled estimates of dichotomous outcomes were calculated using odds ratio (OR) or risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We conducted a time-to-event data meta-analysis using the inverse-variance method and reported the results as summary hazard ratio (HR) and associated 95% CI. Random-effects methods of meta-analysis were applied. We formed meta-regression models to explore heterogeneity as a result of changes in practice over time. Results We identified 17 observational cohort studies published between 2011 and 2017, reporting a total of 4498 patients. The pooled prevalence of EVAR performed outside the IFU was 40% (95% CI, 33-48). Nonadherence to IFU was not associated with increased risk of perioperative mortality (RD, 0.01; 95% CI, −0.00 to 0.01; P = .23), aneurysm rupture (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.30-5.93; P = .70), aneurysm-related mortality (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.20-3.84; P = .86), technical failure (RD, 0.01; 95% CI, −0.03 to 0.05; P = .56), requirement for adjunctive procedures (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.81-2.71; P = .20), type I endoleak (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 0.58-8.91; P = .24), aneurysm sac expansion (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.55-1.33; P = .49), or aneurysm-related reintervention (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.81-1.34; P = .74). The overall mortality was significantly higher in patients treated outside the IFU (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.02-1.42; P = .03). Meta-regression showed that the prevalence of EVAR performed outside the IFU has increased over time (P = .019). Conclusions Standard EVAR outside the IFU was not found to have worse aneurysm-related outcomes than treatment within the IFU. Standard EVAR outside the IFU could be considered in selected patients who are deemed high risk for complex open or endovascular surgery.

Objective Chimney endovascular aortic aneurysm repair is gaining ever greater acceptance. However, persistent gutters leading to type IA endoleaks represent an unsolved issue. The aim of the current study was to analyze the impact of abdominal endograft oversizing to the occurrence of this phenomenon. Methods The PERformance of the snorkel/chImney endovascular teChnique in the treatment of compLex aortic PathologiesES registry includes the largest experience with chimney endovascular aortic aneurysm repair from 13 vascular centers in Europe and the U.S. Prospectively collected data from centers with standard use of the Endurant stent-graft and balloon-expandable covered stents as chimney grafts only were included in the present analysis. The parameter which varied was the degree of oversizing of the aortic stent-graft classifying the cohort in two groups, group A (20% and less oversizing) and group B (>20% of oversizing). The primary endpoint was the incidence of persistent type IA endoleak needed reintervention. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality and freedom from reintervention. Results Group A included 21 patients while group B 144. The mean preoperative pathology’s neck length and diameter was 5.8 mm (±4.4) versus 4.9 mm (±3.8) and 27.6 mm (±4.7) versus 24.9 mm (±3.7) for group A and group B, respectively. The mean length of the new sealing zone after chimney graft placement was similar for both groups (group A versus group B; 17.9 mm versus 18.3 mm, respectively, P = .21). The percentage of oversizing of the aortic stent-graft ranged between 13.8 and 20% versus 22.2 and 30%, for group A and group B, respectively. Patients of group A had more type 1A endoleaks, (14.3%) versus patients of group B (2.1%) based on the first follow-up imaging, P = .02. The incidence of persistent type IA endoleaks needing a reintervention was 14.3 and 1.4% for the group A and group B, respectively, P = .01. The mean volume of contrast medium used was greater in group A versus group B with 239 ml versus150 ml, P = .05. Additionally, 14.3% of patients of group A experienced acute renal failure compared to those in group B which was 1.0%, P = .01. Conclusions Oversizing of ideally 30% of the Endurant stent-graft is associated with significant lower incidence of type IA endoleaks requiring reintervention for patients treated by chimney endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Background The iliac side branch device (IBD) is a valid method for the treatment of abdominal aorto-iliac aneurysms. However there is still a lack of evidence regarding the optimal length of the bridging stent graft (BSG) since aneurysmal degeneration of the hypogastric artery (HA) is an exclusion criterion. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of longer BSG compared to the widely used 38mm stent-grafts in terms of reintervention rate and primary patency. Methods We retrospectively analyzed our prospectively collected database of all patients who underwent an endovascular aneurysm repair using an IBD in our center between April 2005 and May 2015. The used BSGs were divided into 2 groups. In group A, the BSG was ≤38 mm, and group B>38 mm. The primary endpoint was BSG-related events, including stenosis, occlusion or endoleak. Secondary endpoints were technical success, primary patency and 30-day mortality. Results Two hundred sixty IBDs were implanted in 215 consecutive patients. Ninetyseven (37%) in group A and 163 (63%) in group B. The technical success rate was 100%. The 30-day mortality was 1% (N.=1) and 1.2% (N.=2) respectively for group A and B (P=0.8). The freedom from BSG-related events amounted to 84% at 60 months for the total cohort. The comparison between the two groups shows no significant difference, while a slight favorable trend for group B (75% vs. 91% at 60 months, P=0.081) was observed. No differences were found as to primary patency (96% and 99% at 60 months respectively for group A and B, P=0.237). Conclusions The use of longer stent-grafts (>38 mm) seems not to affect the performance of BSG even in the long run, expanding the indication for IBD also for aneurysms of the hypogastric artery.

Background The durability of endovascular aortic aneurysms repair (EVAR) is highly related to several anatomical constraints. The term “hostile neck” describes several anatomical features that usually make EVAR treatment technically demanding despite having higher risk of failure. The aim of the study was to describe a multicenter experience with EVAR and an adjunctive use of EndoAnchors in hostile neck anatomies. Methods Data were prospectively collected from 4 academic vascular centers including 46 patients with a hostile neck treated by standard EVAR with the adjunctive use of EndoAnchors. Twenty-two of them (47.8%, group A) had an intraoperative type Ia endoleak, and 24 (52.2%) patients were treated in a preventive manner (group B). Primary endpoints were technical and procedural success. Secondary endpoints were regression of the aneurysm sac, freedom from type Ia endoleak, and reinterventions. Results Neck length and diameter showed no statistical difference in preoperative measures, 9.1 ± 6.9 mm and 8.6 ± 2.8 mm and 25.4 ± 4.7 mm and 27.3 ± 4.7 mm, in group A and B, respectively. Aneurysm sac diameter decreased from 58.2 ± 8 mm and 57.9 ± 9.8 mm to 55.7 ± 8.5 mm and 53.8 ± 10.4 mm in group A and B; respectively, at the last computed tomography scan. Technical and procedural success was 97.8% and 100%, respectively, for group B. Group A showed persistence of type Ia endoleak at completion angiogram in 9 (40.9%) patients. Five of them showed early spontaneous sealing at the first (30 days) computed tomography angiography (CTA), and in the remaining 4, a delayed spontaneous sealing was diagnosed at 12-month CTA. No neck-related secondary procedures were performed. Overall survival was 91%. Conclusions Our study shows that additional use of EndoAnchors can successfully improve the sealing of abdominal endografts in case of intraoperative type Ia endoleaks in hostile neck anatomies, representing a safe and effective endovascular alternative in our armamentarium. However, meticulous radiological follow-up is necessary because complete resolution of all observed intraoperative type Ia endoleaks was not observed until the 12-month CTA follow-up.

Background Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an important cardiovascular (CV)-related disease that requires surgical treatment to prevent rupture. The elevation of arterial stiffness (AS) is an increasingly recognized independent determinant of CV morbidity and mortality and plays a special role in atherosclerosis. The importance of the surgical technique used for AAA repair in the long-term outcomes still needs to be clarified, and whether endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) or open surgical repair (OSR) confers high AS measurements and thus worse prognosis in terms of CV morbidity needs further investigation. Methods A prospective nonrandomized study that included consecutive patients requiring either EVAR or OSR for AAA disease between February 2015 and January 2016 was conducted. This study is registered on the National Institutes of Health website ( ClinicalTrials.gov ) and identified with NCT02642952. Several noninvasive measurements of AS and central aortic hemodynamics were obtained before surgery and in the first postoperative control (4–6 weeks), with change from baseline in heart rate–adjusted augmentation index (AIx@75) as main outcome. Likewise, inflammatory circulating biomarkers were also measured in the same time line. Results We included 44 patients, 25 in the EVAR group and 19 in the OSR group. Subjects who underwent EVAR were older and presented larger aneurysm diameter at baseline. There was a significant decrease in AIx@75 in the EVAR group after treatment (−4.1 ± 8.1%, P = 0.018), for a moderate effect size (d = 0.508), whereas the decreasing trend in the OSR group (−2.5 ± 6.7%, P = 0.127) was not statistically significant. No significant changes in carotid-radial pulse wave velocity (PWVCR) and central blood pressures were observed. The inflammatory markers increased after surgical repair, with significant changes in homocysteine in both EVAR (5.2 ± 6.9 μmol/L, P = 0.002) and OSR (1.8 ± 2.1 μmol/L, P = 0.002) groups. Conclusions Our study suggests that both treatments confer better postoperative values of AS measured by AIx@75 and produces no changes in PWVCR, in the early term. Whether this situation is maintained during follow-up needs further investigation.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the polar orientation of renal chimney grafts within the proximal seal zone and to determine whether graft orientation is associated with early type Ia endoleak or renal graft compression after chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (ch-EVAR). METHODS: Patients who underwent ch-EVAR with at least one renal chimney graft from 2009 to 2015 were included in this analysis. Centerline three-dimensional reconstructions were used to analyze postoperative computed tomography scans. The 12-o’clock polar position was set at the takeoff of the superior mesenteric artery. Relative polar positions of chimney grafts were recorded at the level of the renal artery ostium, at the mid-seal zone, and at the proximal edge of the graft fabric. Early type Ia endoleaks were defined as evidence of a perigraft flow channel within the proximal seal zone. RESULTS: There were 62 consecutive patients who underwent ch-EVAR (35 double renal, 27 single renal) for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms with a mean follow-up of 31.2 months; 18 (29%) early type Ia “gutter” endoleaks were identified. During follow-up, the majority of these (n = 13; 72%) resolved without intervention, whereas two patients required reintervention (3.3%). Estimated renal graft patency was 88.9% at 60 months. Left renal chimney grafts were most commonly at the 3-o’clock position (51.1%) at the ostium, traversing posteriorly to the 5- to 7-o’clock positions (55.5%) at the fabric edge. Right renal chimney grafts started most commonly at the 9-o’clock position (n = 17; 33.3%) and tended to traverse both anteriorly (11 to 1 o’clock; 39.2%) and posteriorly (5 to 7 o’clock; 29.4%) at the fabric edge. In the polar plane, the majority of renal chimney grafts (n = 83; 85.6%) traversed 90 degrees were independently associated with early type Ia endoleaks (odds ratio, 11.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.1–64.8) even after controlling for other device and anatomic variables. Polar orientation of the chimney grafts was not associated with graft kinking or compression (P = .38) or occlusion (P = .10). Takeoff angle of the renal arteries was the most significant predictor of chimney graft orientation. Caudally directed arteries (takeoff angle >30 degrees) were less likely to have implanted chimney grafts that traversed >90 degrees in polar angle (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.01–0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Renal chimney grafts vary considerably in both starting position and their polar trajectory within the proximal seal zone. Grafts that traverse >90 degrees in polar angle within the seal zone may be at increased risk of early type Ia endoleaks and require more frequent imaging surveillance. Caudally directed renal arteries result in a more favorable polar geometry (eg, cranial-caudal orientation) with respect to endoleak risk and thus are more ideal candidates for parallel graft strategies.

Objective Hypogastric aneurysms (HAs) frequently coexist with aortoiliac aneurysms (AIAs). However, the presence of an HA is a contraindication to endovascular aneurysm treatment by iliac branch devices (IBDs) because of the risk of distal sealing-related endoleaks. No robust evidence exists in the published literature, and therefore we sought to evaluate the performance of IBDs in the presence of HAs within a multicenter registry of nine vascular centers. Methods Clinical and radiographic information of 804 patients with AIAs treated by IBDs was retrospectively reviewed and analyzed using prearranged, defined, and documented protocols. The treatment period was between January 2005 and April 2017. Results HA was present in 315 (32.6%) of the overall 910 deployed IBDs. Mean radiologic follow-up was 32 months. The incidence of incomplete aneurysm exclusion and type I endoleak was 3% in the HA group vs 0.7% in the non-HA group (P = .019). The 5-year freedom from IBD-related type I endoleak was 93% vs 98% in the HA group vs the non-HA group, respectively (P = .006). Subgroup analysis of the HA group revealed that use of a single distal bridging stent graft vs multiple bridging devices led to higher rate of type I endoleak (9.6% vs 2.8%; P = .031), branch occlusions (8.3% vs 0.9%; P = .009), and buttock claudication (7.6% vs 1.9%; P = .038). Conclusions This series of AIAs with HAs is the largest reported. It shows that HAs coexisting with AIAs, when treated with IBDs, have significantly worse outcomes. Lengthening the distal landing zone with more than one bridging stent graft into the distal healthy hypogastric artery or one of its main branches improves outcomes.

Objective The ideal stent combination for chimney endovascular aneurysm repair remains undetermined. Therefore, we sought to identify optimal aortic and chimney stent combinations that are associated with the best outcomes by analyzing the worldwide collected experience in the PERformance of chImney technique for the treatment of Complex aortic pathoLogiES (PERICLES) registry. Methods The PERICLES registry was reviewed for patients with pararenal aortic disease electively treated from 2008 to 2014. Eleven different aortic devices were identified with three distinct subgroups: group A (n = 224), nitinol/polyester; group B (n = 105), stainless steel/polyester; and group C (n = 69), nitinol/expanded polytetrafluoroethylene. The various chimney stent subtypes included the balloon-expandable covered stent (BECS), self-expanding covered stent, and bare-metal stent. Deidentified aortic and chimney device combinations were compared for risk of chimney occlusion, type IA endoleak, and survival. Effects of high-volume centers (>100 cases), use of an internal lining chimney stent, number of chimney stents, and number of chimney stent subtypes deployed were also considered. We considered demographics, comorbidities, and aortic anatomic features as potential confounders in all models. Results The 1- and 3-year freedom from BECS chimney occlusion was not different between groups (group A, 96% ± 2% and 87% ± 5%; groups B and C, 93% ± 3% and 76% ± 10%; Cox model, P = .33). Similarly, when non-BECS chimney stents were used, no difference in occlusion risk was noted for the three aortic device groupings; however, group C patients receiving BECS did have a trend toward higher occlusion risk relative to group C patients not receiving a BECS chimney stent (hazard ratio [HR], 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-18.84; P = .08). Patients receiving multiple chimney stents, irrespective of stent subtype, had a 1.8-fold increased risk of occlusion for each additional stent (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.9; P = .01). Use of a bare-metal endolining stent doubled the occlusion hazard (HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.0-4.5; P = .05). Risk of type IA endoleak (intraoperatively and postoperatively) did not significantly differ for the aortic devices with BECS use; however, group C patients had higher risk relative to groups A/B without BECS (C vs B: odds ratio [OR], 3.2 [95% CI, 1-11; P = .05]; C vs A/B: OR, 2.4 [95% CI, 0.9-6.4; P = .08]). Patients treated at high-volume centers had significantly lower odds for development of type IA endoleak (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7; P = .01) irrespective of aortic or chimney device combination. Mortality risk was significantly higher in group C + BECS vs group A + BECS (HR, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.6-17.5; P = .006). The 1- and 3-year survival for groups A, B, and C (+BECS) was as follows: group A, 97% ± 1% and 92% ± 3%; group B, 93% ± 3% and 83% ± 7%; and group C, 84% ± 7% and 63% ± 14%. Use of more than one chimney subtype was associated with increased mortality (HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.4-7.5; P = .006). Conclusions Within the PERICLES registry, use of nitinol/polyester stent graft devices with BECS during chimney endovascular aneurysm repair is associated with improved survival compared with other aortic endografts. However, this advantage was not observed for non-BECS repairs. Repairs incorporating multiple chimney subtypes were also associated with increased mortality risk. Importantly, increasing chimney stent number and bare-metal endolining stents increase chimney occlusion risk, whereas patients treated at low-volume centers have higher risk of type IA endoleak.

Objective We evaluated the short- and long-term results of off-label use of iliac branch devices (IBDs) in isolated common iliac artery aneurysms compared with the manufacturer-recommended configuration with additional extension in the infrarenal aorta based on the pELVIS Registry (pErformance of iLiac branch deVIces for aneurysmS involving the iliac bifurcation). Methods Between January 2005 and April 2017, 804 patients underwent endovascular aneurysm repair with 910 IBDs owing to aneurysmal involvement of the iliac bifurcation in nine high-volume European vascular centers. Among this cohort, 231 IBDs were implanted in 207 patients to treat an isolated common iliac aneurysm; 91 IBDs (group 1) were implanted without proximal aortic extension in the infrarenal aorta, and in the remaining cases (n = 140; group 2) an aortic bifurcated stent graft was deployed proximally as stated in the instructions for use. Primary outcomes were IBD and target hypogastric artery occlusions, type I and III endoleaks, procedure-related reinterventions, and aneurysm-related deaths. Results Technical success was achieved in 90 cases (98.9%) in group 1 versus 137 cases (97.8%) in group 2 (P = .55). The overall aneurysm-related early reintervention rate for the two groups was 4.4% (4 of 91) and 2.1% (3 of 140), respectively (P = .33). The 30-day mortality was 1.1% in group 1 (n = 1), and 0% in group 2 (P = .21). The median postoperative follow-up in groups 1 and 2 were 34.1 months (range, 1-108 months) and 17.5 months (range, 1-90 months), respectively. The estimated rates of freedom from IBD occlusion at 60 months were 86% in group 1 and 83% in group 2 (P = .69). The estimated rates of freedom from target hypogastric artery occlusion at 60 months were 98.3% in group 1 and 91.3% in group 2 (P = .45). The estimated freedom from reintervention rates at 60 months for types I, types III, and IBD stenosis-occlusion were 78.2% in group 1 and 79.9% in group 2 (P = .79). The estimated freedom from all cause reintervention at 60 months was 64.5% in group 1 and 66.1% in group 2 (P = .44). The estimated freedom from aneurysm-related death at 60 months was 97.9% in group 1 and 100% in group 2 (P = .83). Conclusions Single IBD placement for isolated common iliac artery aneurysms seems to be a safe and effective treatment option, when a proper anatomic patient selection is provided. Major benefits are represented by the decrease in X ray exposure, overall procedural time, and use of contrast medium, without affecting perioperative and long-term results in comparison with more extensive procedures.

Objective Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with the chimney technique (ch-EVAR) has been used for the treatment of aortic aneurysms as an alternative approach to fenestrated endografting or open repair. Nonetheless, the need for an upper extremity arterial access may contribute to a higher risk for periprocedural cerebrovascular events. This study reports on the perioperative cerebral and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) after ch-EVAR. Methods The PERICLES registry (PERformance of the chImney technique for the treatment of Complex aortic pathoLogiES) is an international, retrospective multicenter study evaluating the performance of ch-EVAR for the treatment of complex aortic pathologies. For the purpose of the current analysis, 425 patients treated by ch-EVAR between 2008 and 2014 were included. The primary outcome of this analysis was the incidence of procedure related cerebrovascular events defined as transient ischemic attack or stroke. The secondary end point was in-hospital MACCE, including acute coronary syndrome, stroke, and death of any cause. Results The incidence of clinical relevant cerebrovascular events was 1.9% (8/425). A postoperative transient ischemic attack was observed in four patients (0.95%) and a stroke in additional four (0.95%). Three patients died during the hospital stay secondary to sequelae from postoperative stroke. A prior history of stroke/transient ischemic attack, atrial fibrillation, previous carotid revascularization, or known carotid artery disease did not significantly increase the risk for adverse neurologic events. The overall MACCE rate amounted to 8.5% (36/425). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the use of bilateral upper extremity access (odds ratio [OR], 2.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-7.45]), aneurysm rupture (OR, 5.33; 95% CI, 1.74-16.33), and a prolonged operation time (>290 minutes; OR, 1.005; 95% CI, 1.001-1.008) were associated with a significantly increased risk for MACCE. Conclusions This analysis demonstrates that ch-EVAR is associated with a relatively low rate of cerebrovascular events. However, a postoperative stroke is associated with increased mortality. Ruptured aneurysms, bilateral upper extremity access as in case of multiple chimney graft placement, and longer operative times were identified as independent risk factors for MACCE.

Objective The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the early and late 7-year experience with the Endurant bifurcated stent graft system (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Calif) in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Methods Between November 14, 2007, and December 2013, 712 consecutive high-risk patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms underwent elective or urgent placement of an Endurant bifurcated endograft in our institution. The included patients were consecutive (all comers) and treated independently from their morphologic eligibility for use of the Endurant device based on the instructions for use. The primary study outcome was freedom from all-cause reintervention. Results The median follow-up was 19.2 months (interquartile range, 6.3-35.9 months). Overall, 517 patients (72.6%) were treated on the basis of instructions for use conditions. On the other hand, 195 patients (27.4%) had morphologic data not consistent with the recommendations for the use of the Endurant system. The 30-day mortality was 1.4% (10 of 712). Nine patients (1.2%) were lost to follow-up because of relocation abroad. The overall mortality rate was 14.74% (101 of 703). Overall survival rate was 92.3% at 1 year, 86.4% at 2 years, and 65% at 5 years. Overall freedom from reintervention rate was 93.3%, 86.4%, and 65% at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years, respectively. Five patients (0.7%) underwent a surgical conversion and explantation of the Endurant device. The reasons were endograft infection (n = 1), endoleak type Ia (n = 1), endoleak type II (n = 1), endograft and limb thrombotic occlusion (n = 1), and endotension (n = 1). The overall iliac limb occlusion rate was 2.1% (15 of 712). Conclusions The performance of the Endurant stent graft during a period of 7 years under real-life conditions was good, with low incidence of reinterventions and endoleaks.