1. Cyclophosphamide, Mitoxantrone, Fluorouracil versus Conventional CMF as Adjuvant Treatment in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients
- Author
-
Fountzilas, George, Polichronis, A., Katsohis, C., Gennatas, Constantinos, Toussis, D., Skarlos, Dimosthenis V., Kosmidis, Paraskevas A., Vassilaros, S., Semoglou, C., Giannakakis, T., Fahantidis, E., Klouvas, G. D., Tsavaris, N., Konstantaras, C., Makrantonakis, P., Kolotas, C., Zamboglou, N., Tsiliakos, S., Hainoglou, D., Mylonakis, N., Pavlidis, Nicholas, and Pavlidis, Nicholas [0000-0002-2195-9961]
- Subjects
Oncology ,Survival rate ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Metastasis ,Breast cancer ,Controlled clinical trial ,Tumor volume ,Drug fatality ,Relapse ,Middle aged ,Lymph node ,Adjuvant ,Priority journal ,Gastrointestinal toxicity ,Anemia ,Nausea ,General Medicine ,Multicenter study ,Clinical trial ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Randomized controlled trial ,Fluorouracil ,Female ,Menopause ,Human ,medicine.drug ,Adult ,Diarrhea ,Node-positive ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Cyclophosphamide ,Vomiting ,Major clinical study ,Follow-up studies ,Bone marrow toxicity ,Article ,Gastrointestinal hemorrhage ,Drug toxicity ,Oral drug administration ,Antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols ,Internal medicine ,Neurotoxicity ,medicine ,Carcinoma ,Humans ,Chemotherapy ,Aged ,Stomatitis ,Mitoxantrone ,business.industry ,Recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor ,Alopecia ,Follow up ,Leukopenia ,medicine.disease ,Thrombocytopenia ,Cancer survival ,Adjuvant chemotherapy ,Liver necrosis ,Methotrexate ,Multivariate analysis ,Remission induction ,Intravenous drug administration ,Heart infarction ,Breast neoplasms ,business ,Controlled study ,Constipation - Abstract
362 evaluable node-positive patients with stage II breast cancer were randomized, receiving either 6 cycles of conventional CMF or 6 cycles of the combination of cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2), mitoxantrone (Novantrone 10 mg/ m2), and fluorouracil (500 mg/m2; CNF). After a median follow-up of 51 months, 64 (36%) patients relapsed in the CMF group and 60 (33%) in the CNF group (p = 0.8276). By Cox multivariate analysis, tumor size, menopausal status and number of involved nodes were retained as independently significant variables. Toxicities were remarkably similar in both groups. It appears that after a median follow-up of 51 months there is no significant difference in relapse-free survival between node-positive patients with breast cancer who received either 6 cycles of the conventional CMF or the CNF combination as adjuvant treatment. © 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel. 53 2 137 146
- Published
- 1996