Search

Background Concomitant anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy increases bleeding risk, but most data are derived from patients with atrial fibrillation. Patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) may differ. Objective To study the management of patients diagnosed with acute VTE while receiving antiplatelet treatment. The primary outcome was the number of patients discharged with concomitant therapy. Secondary outcomes were clinically relevant bleeding, cardiovascular events, recurrent VTE and death during follow-up, according to discharge therapy. Methods We performed a post-hoc analysis of patients included in two prospective registries, sharing the same case report form, from 2007 to 2017. Results Among the 1694 identified patients, 254 (15.0%) were receiving antiplatelet treatment at VTE diagnosis, of whom 61 (24.0%) were discharged with concomitant anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy. In multivariable analysis, age ≥ 80 years-old and the use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for VTE therapy were associated with the decision to stop the antiplatelet, while having dual anti-platelet therapy at baseline, a history of coronaropathy or peripheral arterial disease were associated with concomitant anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy. The decision to stop antiplatelet was associated with a non-significant 46% decrease in the risk of bleeding (OR 0.54 (0.16; 1.78)), and a non-significant 68% increase in the risk of cardiovascular events (OR 1.68 (0.44; 6.46)). Conclusion At acute VTE diagnosis, over 15% of patients were receiving antiplatelet agents, of whom 24% were discharged with concomitant anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy. This therapeutic decision may be associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events, but an increased risk of bleeding.

International audience; Introduction: The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a frequent site of bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism (VTE). At-risk patients have not been consistently identified yet. Methods: We used the RIETE registry to assess the clinical characteristics of patients developing major GI bleeding during the course of anticoagulation. Then, we built a predictive score based on multivariable analysis, aiming to identify patients at increased risk for major GI bleeding. Results: We included 87,431 patients with acute VTE. During the course of anticoagulation, 778 (0.89%) suffered major GI bleeding, 815 (0.93%) non-major GI bleeding and 1462 (1.67%) had major bleeding outside the GI tract. During the first 30 days after major GI bleeding, 7.6% of patients re-bled, 3.9% had VTE recurrences and 33% died. On multivariable analysis, male sex, age >= 70 years, initial VTE presentation as pulmonary embolism, active cancer, prior VTE, recent major bleeding in the GI tract, esophageal varicosities, anemia, abnormal prothrombin time, renal insufficiency and use of corticosteroids were associated to an increased risk for major GI bleeding. Using the predictive score, 39,591 patients (45%) were at low risk; 36,602 (42%) at intermediate-risk; 9315 (11%) at high-risk; and 1923 (2.2%) at very high risk. Their rates of major GI bleeding were: 0.21%, 0.96%, 2.41% and 6.08%, respectively. The c-statistics was 0.771 (95%CI. 0.755-0.786). Conclusions: We have developed a score which has the potential to identify patients at increased risk for GI bleeding, but needs to be externally validated."

Background Detection of severe renal impairment in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) is mandatory both for selecting anticoagulant therapy and for evaluating major bleeding risk, increased by severe renal impairment. Objectives To determine whether the Cockcroft and Gault (CG) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formulas identify severe renal impairment in the same VTE patients presenting the same risk of major bleeding. Patients/Methods We compared clinical characteristics and outcomes during the first 3 months of anticoagulation between VTE patients in the RIETE registry with severe renal impairment according to the CG and/or CKD-EPI formula (estimated glomerular filtration rate 30). Conclusion The CG and CKD-EPI formulas identify different subgroups of patients with severe renal impairment, leading to discordant results in 40.7% of these patients. Irrespective of the formula used for their identification, patients with severe renal impairment have a higher risk of major bleeding under anticoagulant therapy.

The aim of this study was to (1) analyze blood viscosity, red blood cell (RBC) deformability, and aggregation in hospitalized patients with Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19); (2) test the associations between impaired blood rheology and blood coagulation; and (3) test the associations between impaired blood rheology and several indicators of clinical severity. A total of 172 patients with COVID-19, hospitalized in COVID-unit of the Internal Medicine Department (Lyon, France) participated in this study between January and May 2021. Clinical parameters were collected for each patient. Routine hematological/biochemical parameters, blood viscosity, RBC deformability and aggregation, and RBC senescence markers were measured on the first day of hospitalization. A control group of 38 healthy individuals was constituted to compare the blood rheological and RBC profile. Rotational thromboelastography was performed in 76 patients to study clot formation dynamics. Our study demonstrated that patients with COVID-19 had increased blood viscosity despite lower hematocrit than healthy individuals, as well as increased RBC aggregation. In-vitro experiments demonstrated a strong contribution of plasma fibrinogen in this RBC hyper-aggregation. RBC aggregation correlated positively with clot firmness, negatively with clot formation time, and positively with the length of hospitalization. Patients with oxygen supplementation had higher RBC aggregation and blood viscosity than those without, and patients with pulmonary lesions had higher RBC aggregation and enhanced coagulation than those without. This study is the first to demonstrate blood hyper-viscosity and RBC hyper-aggregation in a large cohort of patients with COVID-19 and describe associations with enhanced coagulation and clinical outcomes.

Background Concern for cardiovascular disease (particularly atrial fibrillation-AF) among women with breast cancer is becoming a major issue. We aimed at determining the incidence of cardiovascular disease events (AF, arterial and cardiac events, venous-thromboembolism-VTE) in patients diagnosed with breast cancer, and assessing potential risk factors. Methods We reviewed medical records of all patients diagnosed with breast cancer from 2010 to 2011 in our cancer center. Baseline characteristics of patients and tumors were collected. The main outcome was the occurrence of cardiovascular disease events (AF, VTE, arterial and cardiac events) during the 5-years follow-up. Results Among the 682 breast cancer patients, 22 (3.2%) patients had a history of atrial fibrillation. Thirty-four patients (5%) presented at least one cardiovascular disease event, leading to a cumulative incidence of 5.8% events at 5-years ([3.8–7.7] CI 95%), with most of them occurring in the first 2 years. AF cumulative incidence was 1.1% ([0.1–2.1] CI 95%). Factors associated with the occurrence of cardiovascular disease events (including AF) were an overexpression of HER-2 (HR 2.6 [1.21–5.56] p p p Conclusion The incidence of cardiovascular disease events was 5.8% ([3.8–7.7] CI 95%), with HER-2 over-expression, UICC-stage III tumors or more and pre-existing cardiovascular diseases being associated with them. These findings call for the development of preventive strategies in patients diagnosed with breast cancer.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). However, limited data exist on patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes. To describe the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and short-term outcomes of patients diagnosed with VTE during hospitalization for COVID-19. This is a prospective multinational study of patients with incident VTE during the course of hospitalization for COVID-19. Data were obtained from the Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) registry. All-cause mortality, VTE recurrences, and major bleeding during the first 10 days were separately investigated for patients in hospital wards versus those in intensive care units (ICUs). As of May 03, 2020, a total number of 455 patients were diagnosed with VTE (83% pulmonary embolism, 17% isolated deep vein thrombosis) during their hospital stay; 71% were male, the median age was 65 (interquartile range, 55–74) years. Most patients (68%) were hospitalized in medical wards, and 145 in ICUs. Three hundred and seventeen (88%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 84–91%) patients were receiving thromboprophylaxis at the time of VTE diagnosis. Most patients (88%) received therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin, and 15 (3.6%) received reperfusion therapies. Among 420 patients with complete 10-day follow-up, 51 (12%; 95% CI: 9.3–15%) died, no patient recurred, and 12 (2.9%; 95% CI: 1.6–4.8%) experienced major bleeding. The 10-day mortality rate was 9.1% (95% CI: 6.1–13%) among patients in hospital wards and 19% (95% CI: 13–26%) among those in ICUs. This study provides characteristics and early outcomes of patients diagnosed with acute VTE during hospitalization for COVID-19. Additional studies are needed to identify the optimal strategies to prevent VTE and to mitigate adverse outcomes associated.

International audience; Introduction: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a severe condition which should be screened in patient with persistent dyspnea after pulmonary embolism (PE). After PE, CTEPH incidence was estimated between 0.1 and 9.1% in overall patients. Although cancer is associated with an increased risk of CTEPH, CTEPH incidence is still unknown in cancer patients with PE. We aimed to estimate the frequency CTEPH-likely patients after PE, in cancer patients.Materials: We individualized cancer patients of a monocentric prospective registry including consecutive patients with symptomatic PE. The primary outcome was the frequency of "CTEPH-likely" patients defined by the European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines (an accelerated tricuspid regurgitation more than 2.8m/s and at least 1-2 segmental or larger-sized defects, after more than 3 months of therapeutic anticoagulation).Results: We included 129 cancer patients with PE. Colorectal cancer (19%), breast cancer (17%) and prostate cancer (15%) were the most frequent cancers. PE occurred after surgery or medical immobilization in 17% of patients, while 26% of patients had history of venous thromboembolism. During the follow-up, 2 patients (1.5%) had a clinical suspicion of CTEPH and only 1 patient with ovarian cancer (0.75% 95%CI [0.0%-2.2%]) was classified as "CTEPH-likely", 6 months after PE.Conclusion: The frequency of screening for CTEPH seems negligible in PE patients with cancer. Concomitant cancer may affect the clinical suspicion of CTEPH.

International audience; Objective Patients with systemic sclerosis and both pulmonary hypertension and interstitial lung disease (SSc-PH-ILD) generally carry a worse prognosis than patients with SSc and pulmonary arterial hypertension (SSc-PAH) without ILD. There is no evidence of the efficacy of PAH therapies in SSc-PH-ILD. We undertook this study to compare survival of and response to treatment in patients with SSc-PH-ILD and those with SSc-PAH.Methods We analyzed 128 patients (66 with SSc-PH-ILD and 62 with SSc-PAH) from 15 centers, in whom PH was diagnosed by right-sided heart catheterization; they were prospectively included in the PH registry. All patients received PAH-specific therapy. Computed tomography of the chest was used to confirm or exclude ILD.Results At baseline, patients with SSc-PH-ILD had less severe hemodynamic impairment than those with SSc-PAH (pulmonary vascular resistance 5.7 Wood units versus 8.7 Wood units; P = 0.0005) and lower diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (median 25% [interquartile range (IQR) 18%, 35%] versus 40% [IQR 31%, 51%]; P = 0.0005). Additionally, patients with SSc-PH-ILD had increased mortality (8.1% at 1 year, 21.2% at 2 years, and 41.5% at 3 years) compared to those with SSc-PAH (4.1%, 8.7%, and 21.4%, respectively; P = 0.04). Upon treatment with PAH-targeted therapy, no improvement in the 6-minute walk distance was observed in either group. Improvement in the World Health Organization functional class was observed less frequently in patients with SSc-ILD-PH compared to those with SSc-PAH (13.6% versus 33.3%; P = 0.02). Hemodynamics improved similarly in both groups.Conclusion ILD confers a worse prognosis to SSc-PH. Response to PAH-specific therapy is clinically poor in SSc-PH-ILD but was not found to be hemodynamically different from the response observed in SSc-PAH.

Surviving an embolism exposes patients to potential long-term complications, such as altered quality of life, persistent dyspnea, impaired exercise capacity or pulmonary hypertension. The common objective factor in most of these situations is the presence of residual pulmonary vascular obstruction (RPVO). Planar ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy (V/Q lung scan) is the gold standard for assessing RPVO, which occurs in 46 to 66% of patients at 3 months and persists in 25 to 29% of patients a year after acute PE. Assessed early (i.e. before discharge), RPVO could predict acute PE development with a high negative predictive value. Evaluated after anticoagulation therapy, RPVO could help to manage anticoagulation treatment and predict the risk of PE recurrence and patients identified at risk of developing chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. In this comprehensive review, we provide an overview of the current knowledge of RPVO after PE from imaging diagnosis to clinical consequences. In the first part, we mainly focus on the imaging modalities capable of detecting and quantifying RPVO. We then focus on the symptoms and syndromes linked with this residual obstruction after PE. Although the occurrence of RPVO and long-term complications varies greatly from one patient to another, we finally aim to identify the patients and diseases at risk of developing residual obstruction.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) comprises a cluster of severe conditions characterized by elevated mean pulmonary arterial pressure. While targeted therapies have been approved over the last twenty years for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic-thrombo-embolic PH (CTEPH), the possible role of anticoagulant therapy as a supportive treatment PAH is still debated. In PAH, anticoagulant use remains frequent, although evidence appear to be poor (recommendation class IIb-C in international guidelines). In CTEPH treatment, anticoagulants are highly recommended, because it often involves thrombosis (recommendation class I-C in international guidelines). Historically, PH patients have been treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA), which are the only available oral anticoagulants. In this context, risk/benefit ratio of VKA is affected by the risk of major bleeding events. This drawback could be mitigated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): in addition to being less constraining for patients, DOACs have shown a lower risk of major bleeding events in their already approved indications (venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation). However, DOACs have never been specifically assessed in PAH and CTEPH patients. Bioaccumulation risk should be considered if DOACs are prescribed in PAH and CTEPH patients, especially the risk of drug-drug interaction mediated by P-glycoprotein and cytochrome 3A4 with targeted therapies.