Search

Edoxaban is a non-vitamin K dependent oral anticoagulant (NOAC) licensed for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF). Outcome data on clinical effectiveness and safety in routine care are increasing.In the prospective, non-interventional DRESDEN NOAC REGISTRY a network of 230 physicians enrolled5000 NOAC patients who received prospective central follow. All reported outcome events (stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism; ISTH bleeding; death) were adjudicated using standard definitions.Between 2016 and 2021, 1258 SPAF patients receiving edoxaban were followed for 927.1 ± 562.2 days with a mean edoxaban exposure of 790.3 ± 577.2 days. Edoxaban was discontinued by 274 patients (10.1/100 patient-years; 95% CI 8.9-11.3). The combined endpoint of stroke/TIA/systemic embolism occurred at a rate of 1.7/100 patient-years (95% CI 1.3-2.3) in the intention-to-treat analysis and at 1.3/100 patient-years (95% CI 0.9-1.9) in the on-treatment analysis (censored 3 days after last edoxaban intake). On-treatment rates of ISTH major bleeding were comparable for patients receiving edoxaban 30 mg OD (3.6/100 patient-years; 95% CI 2.2-5.5) or 60 mg OD (2.5/100 patient-years; 95% CI 1.8-3.2). A total of 151 patients (12.0%) died (4.7/100 patient-years; 95% CI 4.0-5.5), with non-stroke cardiovascular events (n = 50), infection/sepsis (n = 40) and terminal malignant disease (n = 31) being the leading causes of death.Overall rates of effectiveness and safety outcomes were in line with latest real-world data (such as ETNA-AF registry) and confirm findings of the phase-III ENGAGE-AF trial. Non-thrombotic cardiovascular events and infectious diseases were the leading causes of death, whereas fatal stroke and fatal bleeding were rare.

Background Treatment of ischemic stroke with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) must be delivered within a narrow time window after symptom onset. This effective hyperacute treatment can be administered after ruling out active anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Whenever this is impractical, e.g., due to aphasia, plasmatic DOAC levels are measured with a consequent delay in the IVT decision-making process ranging from 30 to 60 minutes of time. This study will test the hypothesis that hyperacute point-of-care assessment of clotting time in the patient's whole blood has sufficient diagnostic accuracy to determine immediately whether stroke patients are pretreated with DOAC. Methods and Design This will be a prospective single-center diagnostic accuracy study in 1,850 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients at a tertiary stroke center in Saxony, Germany. Presence of active anticoagulation with DOAC will be determined by point-of-care quantification of clotting time via whole blood viscoelastic testing (ClotPro) using Russell venom viper and ecarin assay compared with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry as the reference standard. Discussion Viscoelastic point-of-care assessment of clotting time in whole blood might improve swift delivery of time-sensitive hyperacute treatment with IVT in stroke patients.

Since direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are administered frequently to an elderly, co-morbid population, medical emergencies including trauma, acute bleeding or organ failure are not uncommon. In these situations, the type, dosage or the time of last intake of anticoagulants is often unknown and single substance analysis by functional tests is only possible if the substance contained in the sample is known. A reliable and validated toxicology screen of DOAC and argatroban would be helpful inform not only attending physicians in the emergency department but also law enforcement and courts of justice. After precipitation with acetone, HPLC separation was achieved on a Phenomenex Luna Pentafluorophenyl Colum using acetonitrile–water (90:10, v/v) as mobile phase system. Detection was performed using a 3200 Q Trap mass spectrometer (AB Sciex). For analysis MRM Scans (MS/MS) with positive ionization were chosen. The method was validated for blank serum as the matrix of choice. Limits of detection are between 0.5 and 1.0 ng/mL, limits of quantification are between 1.9 and 3.6 ng/mL and recoveries are above 60%. The applicability of the method was demonstrated by the determination of DOAC in body fluids from forensic cases and in therapeutic drug monitoring. The rapid simultaneous detection and quantification of apixaban, argatroban, dabigatran etexilate, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban in body fluids by HPLC–MS/MS closes an important gap in emergency toxicology.

Introduction Following successful phase-III trials, direct oral anticoagulants such as rivaroxaban have largely replaced warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF). However, data from randomized trials should be confirmed in unselected cohorts. Materials and methods Prospective registries can provide such data but often limit follow-up to short periods only. Extending our previously reported follow-up of 2.2 years in 1204 SPAF patients receiving rivaroxaban in the non-interventional DRESDEN NOAC REGISTRY, we now provide prospectively collected 5 years data (mean follow-up 5.5 ± 2.3 years) for this cohort. Results Between 1 October 2011 and 31 December 2019, the combined endpoint of stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism occurred at a rate of 2.3/100 patient-years in the intention-to-treat analysis (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9–2.7) and at 1.6/100 patient-years in the on-treatment analysis (events within 3 days after last drug intake). On-treatment rates for major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding were 3.1 and 19.6/100 patient-years, respectively. Rivaroxaban treatment discontinuation occurred in a total of 574 patients during follow-up (11.0/100 patient-years in Kaplan–Meier analysis) and 426 patient died (all-cause mortality 6.3/100 pt. years; mean time from enrolment 3.6 ± 2.1 years), of which the causes of death were reported as arterial or venous embolism for 32 patients (21 occurring after treatment discontinuation and 11 during active treatment) and as bleeding for 24 patients. Conclusions Our data provide reassuring long-term outcome data for an elderly, co-morbid SPAF population, especially with regard to the low rate of fatal thromboembolic and bleeding complications.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is common in COVID-19 patients and is associated with high mortality. The aim of this observational study was to describe patients’ characteristics and outcome, identifying potential risk factors for in-hospital mortality and for developing Long-COVID symptoms. This retrospective study included all patients with COVID-19 associated ARDS (cARDS) in the period from March 2020 to March 2021 who were invasively ventilated at the intensive care unit (ICU) of the University Hospital Dresden, Germany. Between October 2021 and December 2021 patients discharged alive (at minimum 6 months after hospital discharge—midterm survival) were contacted and interviewed about persistent symptoms possibly associated with COVID-19 as well as the quality of their lives using the EQ-5D-5L-questionnaire. Long-COVID was defined as the occurrence of one of the symptoms at least 6 months after discharge. Risk factors for mortality were assessed with Cox regression models and risk factors for developing Long-COVID symptoms by using relative risk (RR) regression. 184 Patients were included in this study (male: n = 134 (73%), median age 67 (range 25–92). All patients were diagnosed with ARDS according to the Berlin Definition. 89% of patients (n = 164) had severe ARDS (Horovitz-index 40 kg/m2) was the strongest predictor for in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio: 3.147, confidence interval 1.000–9.897) and for developing Long-COVID symptoms (RR 1.61, confidence interval 1.26–2.06). In-hospital mortality in severe cARDS patients was high, but > 80% of patients discharged alive survived the midterm observation period. Nonetheless, most patients developed Long-COVID symptoms. Extreme obesity with BMI > 40 kg/m2 was identified as independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality and for developing Long-COVID symptoms.Trial registration DRKS-ID DRKS00027856.

Point of care (POC) devices are increasingly used in the ICU and in anesthesia. Besides POC-devices for blood gas analysis, several devices are available for coagulation measurements. Although basic principles for thromboelastographic measurements are not novel, some promising developments were made during the last decade improving both user-friendliness and measurement reliability. For instance, POC measurements of activated clotting time (ACT) for heparin monitoring is still regarded as standard-of-care in cardiac interventions and surgery. In the field of anesthesia and intensive care medicine, POC-devices for thromboelastographic and platelet aggregation measurements are widely used. Their impact in case of bleeding and patient blood management for cardiothoracic and trauma surgery is well known. Moreover, there are promising concepts for anticoagulation monitoring including new oral anticoagulant drugs. Coagulation POC-devices may also identify patients at specific risk for thromboembolic events quickly. On the other hand, benefits of POC-devices need to be balanced against limitations, which include technical restrictions and operator related errors, mainly affecting reproducibility and interpretation of results. Therefore, it is recommendable to consider results of POC-coagulation testing in comparison to standard laboratory tests (SLT). Nevertheless, in urgent or emergency situations POC results enable fast decision making to optimize patient care.

Summary Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have largely replaced vitamin K antagonists in many indications for anticoagulation. Prescribed to millions of patients, including women of reproductive age, exposure to DOACs in early pregnancy is not uncommon, but data on the embryotoxic risks are scarce. We aimed to assess the risk of DOAC embryotoxicity in a large sample of reported cases. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we collected individual case reports of DOAC exposure in pregnancy from gynaecologists, haematologists, and vascular specialists starting from May, 2015. We obtained exports in April and October, 2017, August, 2018, and December, 2019, from the pharmacovigilance databases of the DOAC manufacturers, the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the German drug authority, and searched the homepage of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for pregnancy exposure reports. Data from the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) registry were obtained in August, 2018, and on July 21, 2020; data from the Teratology Information Service in Ulm, Germany, were received July 22, 2020. We also ran a systematic literature search on July 22, 2020, for cases of DOAC exposure. These data were compiled with those from our 2016 risk assessment and duplicate reports were excluded. Fetal or neonatal abnormalities were classified as a major birth defect according to the European Concerted Action on Congenital Anomalies and Twins (EUROCAT) classification and adjudicated into four categories: relation to DOAC exposure likely, possible, unlikely, or unrelated. Findings We identified 1193 reports of DOAC exposure during pregnancy: 49 from physicians, 48 from the ISTH registry, 29 from the Teratology Information Service, 62 from the German drug authority, 536 from Bayer (extracted from the Bayer pharmacovigilance system, the WHO VigiBase, and from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System), 87 from Boehringer Ingelheim, 16 from Daiichi Sankyo, 98 from the literature search, two from the FDA homepage search, ten from the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Review, and 256 from the EMA reports. After excluding potential duplicates, we identified 614 unique cases of DOAC exposure in pregnancy occurring between Feb 1, 2007, and July 9, 2020, that consisted of rivaroxaban in 505 (82%) pregnancies, dabigatran in 36 (6%), apixaban in 50 (8%), and edoxaban in 23 (4%). The median duration of DOAC exposure was 5·3 weeks (IQR 4·0–7·0) into pregnancy. Information on pregnancy outcome was available in 336 (55%) of 614 pregnancies: 188 (56%) livebirths, 74 (22%) miscarriages, and 74 (22%) elective pregnancy terminations. 21 (6%; 95% CI 4–9) of 336 showed fetal abnormalities, of which 12 (4%; 2–6) were adjudicated as major birth defects potentially related to DOAC exposure. Interpretation Although reports of pregnancy outcomes after DOAC exposure are missing important details and predominantly describe rivaroxaban exposures, the available data do not suggest that DOAC exposure in pregnancy carries a high risk of embryopathy. The 2016 ISTH guidance against elective pregnancy termination for fear of DOAC embryotoxicity and the recommendation in favour of close pregnancy surveillance is still valid. Pregnancy outcome data are inconsistently captured in pharmacovigilance databases, indicating a strong need for a more robust system of reporting. Funding None.

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and summarize the clinical efficacy and safety of available antithrombotic therapies after peripheral endovascular or surgical revascularization in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Five databases were searched using free-text and Emtree/Mesh terms for PAD, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and antithrombotic therapies of interest (ie, single antiplatelet therapy, dual antiplatelet therapy, and vitamin K antagonists). Randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion if they assessed the risk of thrombotic events (ie, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, cardiovascular death, limb ischemia, or limb amputation) or safety profile (ie, minor, moderate, major, or fatal bleeding events) after revascularization. In total, 16 RCTs were identified. Only a few studies reported on treatment effects of the investigated therapies. Myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, cardiovascular death, and amputation were reported in up to 2.3%, 2.3%, 5.6%, and 7.3% of patients, respectively. Bleeding events were observed in up to 8.4% (major) and 1.5% (fatal) of patients. Despite available treatments, patients with PAD undergoing revascularization remain at risk of thrombotic events. There is a need for new treatments that will help to optimize care for patients with symptomatic PAD undergoing revascularization.

Andexanet alfa is approved (FDA "accelerated approval"; EMA "conditional approval") as the first specific reversal agent for factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor-associated uncontrolled or life-threatening bleeding. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCC) are commonly used as an off-label, non-specific, factor replacement approach to manage FXa inhibitor-associated life-threatening bleeding. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of andexanet alfa versus 4F-PCC for management of apixaban- or rivaroxaban-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).This two-cohort comparison study included andexanet alfa patients enrolled at US hospitals from 4/2015 to 3/2020 in the prospective, single-arm ANNEXA-4 study and a synthetic control arm of 4F-PCC patients admitted within a US healthcare system from 12/2016 to 8/2020. Adults with radiographically confirmed ICH who took their last dose of apixaban or rivaroxaban 24 h prior to the bleed were included. Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score 7, hematoma volume 60 mL, or planned surgery within 12 h were excluded. Outcomes were hemostatic effectiveness from index to repeat scan, mortality within 30 days, and thrombotic events within five days. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using propensity score-overlap weighted logistic regression.The study included 107 andexanet alfa (96.6% low dose) and 95 4F-PCC patients (79.3% receiving a 25 unit/kg dose). After propensity score-overlap weighting, mean age was 79 years, GCS was 14, time from initial scan to reversal initiation was 2.3 h, and time from reversal to repeat scan was 12.2 h in both arms. Atrial fibrillation was present in 86% of patients. Most ICHs were single compartment (78%), trauma-related (61%), and involved the intracerebral and/or intraventricular space(s) (53%). ICH size was ≥ 10 mL in volume (intracerebral and/or ventricular) or ≥ 10 mm in thickness (subdural or subarachnoid) in 22% of patients and infratentorial in 15%. Andexanet alfa was associated with greater odds of achieving hemostatic effectiveness (85.8% vs. 68.1%; OR 2.73; 95% CI 1.16-6.42) and decreased odds of mortality (7.9% vs. 19.6%; OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.13-0.98) versus 4F-PCC. Two thrombotic events occurred with andexanet alfa and none with 4F-PCC.In this indirect comparison of patients with an apixaban- or rivaroxaban-associated ICH, andexanet alfa was associated with better hemostatic effectiveness and improved survival compared to 4F-PCC. Trial registration NCT02329327; registration date: December 31, 2014.

Background and Purpose: It is unestablished whether andexanet alfa, compared with guideline-based usual care including prothrombin complex concentrates, is associated with reduced hematoma expansion (HE) and mortality in patients with factor-Xa inhibitor–related intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We compared the occurrence of HE and clinical outcomes in patients treated either with andexanet alfa or with usual care during the acute phase of factor-Xa inhibitor–related ICH. Methods: Data were extracted from the multicenter, prospective, single-arm ANNEXA-4 trial (Andexanet Alfa, a Novel Antidote to the Anticoagulation Effects of Factor Xa Inhibitors) and a multicenter observational cohort study, RETRACE-II (German-Wide Multicenter Analysis of Oral Anticoagulant-Associated Intracerebral Hemorrhage - Part Two). HE was based on computed tomography scans performed within 36 hours from baseline imaging. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed to adjust for baseline comorbidities and ICH severity. Patients presenting with atraumatic ICH while receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban within 18 hours of admission were included. Patients with secondary ICH or not fulfilling the inclusion criteria for the ANNEXA-4 trial were excluded. We compared ANNEXA-4 patients, who received andexanet alfa for hemostatic treatment, with RETRACE-II patients who were treated with usual care, primarily administration of prothrombin complex concentrates. Primary outcome was rate of HE defined as relative increase of ≥35%. Secondary outcomes comprised mean absolute change in hematoma volume, as well as in-hospital mortality and functional outcome. Results: Overall, 182 patients with factor-Xa inhibitor–related ICH (85 receiving andexanet alfa versus 97 receiving usual care) were selected for analysis. There were no relevant differences regarding demographic or clinical characteristics between both groups. HE occurred in 11 of 80 (14%) andexanet alfa patients compared with 21 of 67 (36%) usual care patients (adjusted relative risk, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.20–0.78]; P =0.005), with a reduction in mean overall hematoma volume change of 7 mL. There were no statistically significant differences among in-hospital mortality or functional outcomes. Sensitivity analysis including only usual care patients receiving prothrombin complex concentrates demonstrated consistent results. Conclusions: As compared with usual care, andexanet alfa was associated with a lower rate of HE in atraumatic factor-Xa inhibitor–related ICH, however, without translating into significantly improved clinical outcomes. A comparative trial is needed to confirm the benefit on limiting HE and to explore clinical outcomes across patient subgroups and by time to treatment. Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02329327 and NCT03093233.

Thrombosis and haemostasis 122(4), 552-559 (2022). doi:10.1055/a-1549-6556, Published by Thieme, Stuttgart

Robust evidence on the optimal management of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is lacking. We conducted an individual-patient meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation for SVT. Medline, Embase, and clincaltrials.gov were searched up to June 2021 for prospective cohorts or randomized clinical trials including patients with SVT. Data from individual datasets were merged, and any discrepancy with published data was resolved by contacting study authors. Three studies of a total of 1635 patients were included. Eighty-five percent of patients received anticoagulation for a median duration of 316 days (range, 1-730 days). Overall, incidence rates for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding, and mortality were 5.3 per 100 patient-years (p-y; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1-5.5), 4.4 per 100 p-y (95% CI, 4.2-4.6), and 13.0 per 100 p-y (95% CI, 12.4-13.6), respectively. The incidence rates of all outcomes were lower during anticoagulation and higher after treatment discontinuation or when anticoagulation was not administered. In multivariable analysis, anticoagulant treatment appeared to be associated with a lower risk of recurrent VTE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.64), major bleeding (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.30-0.74), and mortality (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.17-0.31). Results were consistent in patients with cirrhosis, solid cancers, myeloproliferative neoplasms, unprovoked SVT, and SVT associated with transient or persistent nonmalignant risk factors. In patients with SVT, the risk of recurrent VTE and major bleeding is substantial. Anticoagulant treatment is associated with reduced risk of both outcomes., peer-reviewed

Heparins and vitamin K antagonists are the mainstay of treatment of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT). Rivaroxaban is a potential alternative, but data to support its use are limited. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban for the treatment of acute SVT. In an international, single-arm clinical trial, adult patients with a first episode of noncirrhotic, symptomatic, objectively diagnosed SVT received rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg daily for an intended duration of 3 months. Patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome and those receiving full-dose anticoagulation for >7 days prior to enrollment were excluded. Primary outcome was major bleeding; secondary outcomes included death, recurrent SVT, and complete vein recanalization within 3 months. Patients were followed for a total of 6 months. A total of 103 patients were enrolled; 100 were eligible for the analysis. Mean age was 54.4 years; 64% were men. SVT risk factors included abdominal inflammation/infection (28%), solid cancer (9%), myeloproliferative neoplasms (9%), and hormonal therapy (9%); 43% of cases were unprovoked. JAK2 V617F mutation was detected in 26% of 50 tested patients. At 3 months, 2 patients (2.1%; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-7.2) had major bleeding events (both gastrointestinal). One (1.0%) patient died due to a non–SVT-related cause, 2 had recurrent SVT (2.1%). Complete recanalization was documented in 47.3% of patients. One additional major bleeding event and 1 recurrent SVT occurred at 6 months. Rivaroxaban appears as a potential alternative to standard anticoagulation for the treatment of SVT in non-cirrhotic patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02627053 and at eudract.ema.europa.eu as #2014-005162-29-36.

Kardiologia polska = Polish heart journal 79(11), 1265-1267 (2021). doi:10.33963/KP.a2021.0134, Published by Termedia Wydawn, Poznań

Background Bleeding risk is highly relevant for treatment decisions in cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). Several risk scores exist, but have never been validated in patients with CAT and are not recommended for practice. Objectives To compare methods of estimating clinically relevant (major and clinically relevant nonmajor) bleeding risk in patients with CAT: (1) existing risk scores for bleeding in venous thromboembolism, (2) pragmatic classification based on cancer type, and (3) new prediction model. Methods In a posthoc analysis of the Hokusai VTE Cancer study, a randomized trial comparing edoxaban with dalteparin for treatment of CAT, seven bleeding risk scores were externally validated (ACCP-VTE, HAS-BLED, Hokusai, Kuijer, Martinez, RIETE, and VTE-BLEED). The predictive performance of these scores was compared with a pragmatic classification based on cancer type (gastrointestinal; genitourinary; other) and a newly derived competing risk-adjusted prediction model based on clinical predictors for clinically relevant bleeding within 6 months after CAT diagnosis with nonbleeding-related mortality as the competing event (“CAT-BLEED”). Results Data of 1,046 patients (149 events) were analyzed. Predictive performance of existing risk scores was poor to moderate (C-statistics: 0.50–0.57; poor calibration). Internal validation of the pragmatic classification and “CAT-BLEED” showed moderate performance (respective C-statistics: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56–0.66, and 0.63; 95% CI 0.58–0.68; good calibration). Conclusion Existing risk scores for bleeding perform poorly after CAT. Pragmatic classification based on cancer type provides marginally better estimates of clinically relevant bleeding risk. Further improvement may be achieved with “CAT-BLEED,” but this requires external validation in practice-based settings and with other DOACs and its clinical usefulness is yet to be demonstrated.

Although direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have widespread first-line use for treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE), uncertainty remains regarding their efficacy and safety in patients with obesity. We reviewed available data for use of DOACs for VTE treatment and prevention in patients with obesity, including phase 3, phase 4, meta-analyses, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics studies. In addition, we reviewed available data regarding DOACs in bariatric surgery. We provide updated guidance recommendations on using DOACs in patients with obesity for treatment and prevention of VTE, as well as following bariatric surgery.

Background Depending on test assays and the time of last DOAC intake, direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) and direct FXa inhibitors (DXI) may or may not affect prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR) or activated thromboplastin time (aPTT) but the clinical impact is unknown. Methods Using data from the Dresden NOAC Registry, we evaluated the impact of DOAC on first PT, INR or aPTT tests during emergency hospitalizations of DTI/DXI patients and the assay performance across 50 coagulation laboratories. Results In 724 emergency admissions (77 DTI; 647 DXI), 490 cases (67.7%) had a reported last DOAC intake within 12 h before blood sampling. INR and PT were elevated above the upper limit of normal (ULN) in >65% of all cases and aPTT was elevated in 45%. On the other hand, >30% of all cases had normal values of INR, PR and aPTT despite a DOAC intake within the last 12 h. Assay performance for detecting or ruling out therapeutic DOAC levels was highly variable and, overall, insufficient to guide clinical decisions. DOAC specific testing was performed in Conclusion Many DOAC recipients present with elevated PT, INR or aPTT during emergency admissions but false negative values within 12 h of last intake as well as elevated values beyond 24 h after last DOAC intake are common. Both scenarios may result in clinical misinterpretation and, potentially, in patient harm, also because DOAC specific testing is rarely performed in emergency settings.

The recent approval of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for long-term anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism resulted in a rapid implementation of these new drugs into daily care. Although DOAC dosing is similar for women and men and, overall, results in comparable outcomes, sex specific issues need to be considered. This review will discuss DOAC topics specifically related to women's health, including the risks and benefits of DOAC treatment for women, the issue of abnormal uterine bleeding from DOAC and the risk and management of DOAC exposure in pregnancy.

Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD), commonly described by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), is a frequent comorbidity in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and associated with thromboembolic and bleeding complications. Instead of single eGFR measurements, kidney function decline over time may better predict clinical outcomes but this has not been studied so far. Methods Patients with AF and stage 3/4 CKD were prospectively followed within a primary care electronic database from the United Kingdom (IMS-THIN). The associations between the longitudinal eGFR trajectory of these patients and stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, first hospitalization-for-any-cause, and death-from-any-cause were estimated with joint models of longitudinal and time-to-event data. Results 18,240 patients were included (median age 80.4 years, median CHA2DS2-VASc score 4). In 133,676 eGFR measurements (mean: 6 per patient) median "baseline" eGFR was 49 ml/min/1.73m2 [41–55] and mean eGFR decline was 0.54 ml/min/1.73m2/year (95%CI: 0.47–0.62). During follow-up (median 3.2 years; 50,841 patient-years at risk), 5-year cumulative incidence estimates were 9%, 3%, 32% and 76% for stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, hospitalization and death, respectively. In joint modeling, an accelerated decline in kidney function strongly predicted for a higher risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 1.09 per ml/min/1.73m2/year increase in eGFR decline), hospitalization (HR 1.06), and death-from-any-cause (HR 1.11; all p Conclusions Declining kidney function is a critical determinant of unfavourable outcomes in patients with AF and CKD. Longitudinal kidney function trajectories may enable a much more individualized prediction of adverse outcomes in this vulnerable patient population.

We sought to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of prolonged anticoagulation with rivaroxaban following a provoked venous thromboembolism.Using US MarketScan claims from November 2012 to March 2017, we identified adults with ≥1 primary hospitalization or emergency department diagnosis code for venous thromboembolism, a provoking (major or minor, persistent or transient) risk factor, at least 3 months of continuous rivaroxaban treatment, and ≥12 months of continuous insurance benefits prior to their qualifying venous thromboembolism. Patients were categorized as either continuing rivaroxaban or discontinuing anticoagulation (no anticoagulation or nonaspirin antiplatelet agents but may have received aspirin) after the initial 3 months of rivaroxaban treatment (index date). Differences in baseline covariates between cohorts were adjusted for using inverse probability-of-treatment weights based on propensity scores (absolute standardized differences0.1 achieved for all covariates after adjustment). Twelve month incidences of recurrent venous thromboembolism or major bleeding were compared between cohorts using Cox regression (according to an intention-to-treat methodology) and reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Among patients experiencing a provoked venous thromboembolism and treated with rivaroxaban for the first 3 months (N=4,990), continued rivaroxaban use beyond 3 months (median [25%, 75% range duration of additional rivaroxaban use = 3 [2, 5] months) was associated with a 44% (95% CI of 9%-66%) lower hazard of recurrent venous thromboembolism without altering major bleeding risk [HR of 0.87, 95% CI of 0.51-1.49] versus anticoagulation discontinuation (with or without aspirin use).Our study suggests continuing rivaroxaban after the initial 3 month period was associated with a decreased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. The observed reduction in recurrent venous thromboembolism with prolonged rivaroxaban use was not associated with a significant change in major bleeding risk.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate first trimester anticoagulant exposure and risks of adverse pregnancy-related and fetal outcomes. Methods: Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified all pregnant women with preconception venous thromboembolism, 2000-2017, and linked data on exposure to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), vitamin K antagonist (VKA), or non-VKA oral anticoagulant (NOAC) during pregnancy. We assessed pregnancy-related and fetal outcomes associated with first trimester anticoagulant exposure. Results: Among 4490 pregnancies in women with preconception venous thromboembolism (mean age 31 years, 40% nulliparous) during the first trimester, 63.1% were unexposed, 25.9% were exposed to LMWH, 10.4% VKA, and 0.6% NOAC. Adverse outcomes were lowest in unexposed and LMWH exposed. Compared with unexposed, VKA was associated with higher risks of preterm (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.70-2.99) and very preterm birth (adjusted OR 3.78; 95% CI, 1.91-7.49), shorter mean gestational age was associated with VKA (−7.5 days; 95% CI, −9.1 to −5.9 days) or NOAC (−2.3 days; 95% CI, −8.4-3.8), and lower mean birthweight with VKA (−55 g; 95% CI, −103.1 to −8.5) or NOAC (−190 g; 95% CI, −364.1 to −16.4). Adjusted ORs for small-for-gestational-age infants were 1.07 (95% CI, 0.77-1.50) with VKA, and 3.29 (95% CI, 1.26-7.95) with NOAC. Mean 5-minute Apgar score (9.8) and congenital defect prevalence (8.4%-10%) varied little across exposure groups. Conclusions: Fetal risk was lowest in unexposed and LMWH-exposed pregnancies, supporting the recommendation of LMWH during pregnancy. NOAC safety during pregnancy is unclear due to the rarity of NOAC exposure.

Background Lack of data on balancing bleeding and thrombosis risk causes uncertainty about restarting anticoagulants after major bleeding. Anticoagulant reversal trials offer prospectively gathered data after major bleeding with well-documented safety events and restarting behavior. Objectives To examine the relationship of restarting anticoagulation with thrombosis, rebleeding, and death. Methods This is a posthoc analysis of a prospective factor Xa inhibitor reversal study at 63 centers in North America and Europe. We compared outcomes of restarted patients with those not restarted using landmark and time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models. Outcomes included thrombotic and bleeding events and death and a composite of all three. Results Of 352 patients enrolled, oral anticoagulation was restarted in 100 (28%) during 30-day follow-up. Thirty-four (9.7%) had thrombotic events, 15 (4.3%) had bleeding events (after day 3), and 49 (14%) died. In the landmark analysis comparing patients restarted within 14 days to those not, restarting was associated with decreased thrombotic events (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.112; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.001–0.944; p = 0.043) and increased rebleeding (HR = 8.39; 95% CI: 1.13–62.29; p = 0.037). The time-dependent Cox model showed evidence for a reduction in a composite (thrombotic events, bleeding, and death) attempting to capture net benefit (HR = 0.384; 95% CI: 0.161–0.915; p = 0.031). Conclusion This analysis provides modest evidence that restarting anticoagulation in factor Xa inhibitor-associated major bleeding patients is correlated with reduced risk of thrombotic events and increased risk of rebleeding. There is low-level evidence of net benefit for restarting. A randomized trial of restarting would be appropriate.

Preventing thromboembolic events, while minimizing bleeding risks, remains challenging when managing patients with atrial fibrillation. Despite large and successful trial programs, several clinical concerns remain which commonly relate to fears of over- or underexposure to drugs and unfavorable outcomes. After a short summary of the main phase III trial findings, this short review discusses the evidence and clinical relevance of common clinical concerns (correct direct oral anticoagulant [DOAC] dosing; DOAC in moderate-to-severe renal impairment; and the relevance of fasting, nasogastric tube feeding, or high body mass index) on DOAC plasma levels. Finally, the need for specific DOAC antidotes will be addressed.

Endogenous arginine derivatives homoarginine, asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and symmetric dimethyarginine (SDMA) are independent mortality predictors in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Our study reports the first analysis, whether homoarginine, ADMA and SDMA predict venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and overall mortality in patients with suspected acute VTE. We assessed serum levels of homoarginine, ADMA and SDMA by LC–MS/MS in 865 individuals from a prospective consecutive cohort of patients with clinical suspicion of VTE. The median follow-up time for mortality was 1196 days. VTE was confirmed by imaging in 418 patients and excluded in 447 patients. Low levels of homoarginine and high levels of ADMA or SDMA independently predicted all-cause mortality after adjustment for sex, age, oral anticoagulants, body mass index, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, dyslipidemia, chronic heart failure, history of stroke, creatinine and cancer both in patients with VTE and without VTE. Interestingly, none of those parameters was predictive for VTE recurrence. We provide the first report that low circulating levels of homoarginine and high circulating levels of ADMA and SDMA independently predict all-cause mortality in patients with suspected VTE. These parameters might serve as markers of “frailty” and should be considered for future risk stratification approaches in this clinical population. Taking into account that homoarginine supplementation is protective in animal models of CVD and safe in healthy human volunteers, our study provides the basis for future homoarginine supplementation studies in patients with suspected VTE to investigate possible direct protective effects of homoarginine in this population.

Introduction Clinical guidelines recommend anticoagulation therapy for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE), but little is known about preferences. Therefore, the objective of this discrete choice experiment (DCE) was to elucidate patient preferences regarding anticoagulation convenience attributes. Methods Adult patients with cancer-associated VTE who switched to direct oral anticoagulants were included in a single-arm study (COSIMO). Patients were asked to decide between hypothetical treatment options based on a combination of the following attributes: route of administration (injection/tablet), frequency of intake (once/twice daily), need for regular controls of the international normalized ratio (INR) at least every 3 to 4 weeks (yes/no), interactions with food/alcohol (yes/no), and distance to treating physician (1 vs. 20 km) as an additional neutral attribute. DCE data were collected by structured telephone interviews and analyzed based on a conditional logit regression. Results Overall, 163 patients (mean age 63.7 years, 49.1% female) were included. They strongly preferred oral administration compared with self-injections (importance of this attribute for overall treatment decisions: 73.8%), and a treatment without dietary restrictions (11.8%). Even if these attributes were less important (7.2% and 6.5%, respectively), patients indicated a preference for a shorter distance to the treating physician and once-daily dosing compared with twice-daily intake. “Need for regular controls of INR at least every 3 to 4 weeks” showed no significant impact on the treatment decision (0.7%). Conclusion This study showed that treatment-related decision making in cancer-associated VTE, assuming comparable effectiveness and safety of anticoagulant treatments, is predominantly driven by “route of administration,” with patients strongly preferring oral administration.

Background: Recently, the randomized EINSTEIN-Jr study showed similar efficacy and safety for rivaroxaban and standard anticoagulation for treatment of pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE). The rivaroxaban dosing strategy was established based on phase 1 and 2 data in children and through pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling. Methods: Rivaroxaban treatment with tablets or the newly developed granules-for-oral suspension formulation was bodyweight-adjusted and administered once-daily, twice-daily, or thrice-daily for children with bodyweights of ≥30, ≥12 to (0-24)ss] and trough [C trough,ss] and maximum [C max,ss] steady-state plasma concentrations were derived using population PK modeling. Exposure-response graphs were generated to evaluate the potential relationship of individual PK parameters with recurrent VTE, repeat imaging outcomes, and bleeding or adverse events. A taste-and-texture questionnaire was collected for suspension-recipients. Results: Of the 335 children (aged 0-17 years) allocated to rivaroxaban, 316 (94.3%) were evaluable for PK analyses. Rivaroxaban exposures were within the adult exposure range. No clustering was observed for any of the PK parameters with efficacy, bleeding, or adverse event outcomes. Results were similar for the tablet and suspension formulation. Acceptability and palatability of the suspension were favorable. Discussion: Based on this analysis and the recently documented similar efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with standard anticoagulation, we conclude that bodyweight-adjusted pediatric rivaroxaban regimens with either tablets or suspension are validated and provide for appropriate treatment of children with VTE.

There is limited data evaluating clinical outcomes of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in obese patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in obese VTE patients. We performed a cohort analysis using Optum® De-Identified Electronic Health Record data from 11/1/2012 to 9/30/2018. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m

IntroductionEarly discharge of patients with acute low-risk pulmonary embolism requires validation by prospective trials with clinical and quality-of-life outcomes.MethodsThe multinational Home Treatment of Patients with Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism with the Oral Factor Xa Inhibitor Rivaroxaban (HoT-PE) single-arm management trial investigated early discharge followed by ambulatory treatment with rivaroxaban. The study was stopped for efficacy after the positive results of the predefined interim analysis at 50% of the planned population. The present analysis includes the entire trial population (576 patients). In addition to 3-month recurrence (primary outcome) and 1-year overall mortality, we analysed self-reported disease-specific (Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire) and generic (five-level five-dimension EuroQoL (EQ-5D-5L) scale) quality of life as well as treatment satisfaction (Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS)) after pulmonary embolism.ResultsThe primary efficacy outcome occurred in three (0.5%, one-sided upper 95% CI 1.3%) patients. The 1-year mortality was 2.4%. The mean±sdPEmb-QoL decreased from 28.9±20.6% at 3 weeks to 19.9±15.4% at 3 months, a mean change (improvement) of −9.1% (pConclusionsOur results further support early discharge and ambulatory oral anticoagulation for selected patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism. Targeted strategies may be necessary to further improve quality of life in specific patient subgroups.

BACKGROUND In patients on anticoagulant treatment, the major bleeding (MB) definition released by the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) is widely accepted. However, this definition identifies MBs with highly variable short-term risk of death. OBJECTIVES The study aims were to derive and validate a classification of ISTH-defined MBs for the risk of short-term death. METHODS Consecutive patients admitted for ISTH-defined MB occurring while on treatment with oral anticoagulants were included in the study and divided into a derivation and a validation cohort. Death within 30 days was the primary study outcome. RESULTS Among 1077 patients with MB, 64/517 and 63/560 patients in the derivation and validation cohort died, respectively. In the derivation cohort, Glasgow coma scale (GCS)

Background: Although rivaroxaban has demonstrated consistent drug levels in normal weight and obese patients, sufficient confirmation of equal clinical effectiveness and safety is currently lacking...

Edoxaban is licensed in many countries around the world, following successful phase-III trials in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF) and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but at present, little is known about edoxaban-related bleeding complications in daily care. Using data from a prospective, non-interventional oral anticoagulation registry, we analysed rates, management and outcome of edoxaban-related bleeding. Between 1 October 2011 and 28 February 2019, 996 patients were enrolled in the edoxaban cohort and a total of 891 bleeding events were observed (53.2% ISTH minor, 41.9% clinically relevant non-major and 4.9% major bleeding events). In case of major bleeding, surgical or interventional treatment was performed in 25.0% and prothrombin complex concentrate was given in 2 cases. In the time-to-first-event analysis, 100-patient-year rates of major bleeding were 3.1/100 patient-years (95% CI 2.2-4.2). In the as-exposed analysis, case-fatality rates of edoxaban-associated bleeding leading to hospitalizations were 7.5% and 9.0% at days 30 and 90 post bleeding, respectively. Taken together, our data indicate that, in real life, rates of edoxaban-related major bleeding in line with rates observed in phase III trials and that bleeding pattern, management and outcome of these events are not different from those reported for other direct factor Xa inhibitors. Clinical Trial Notation: Dresden NOAC Registry - ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01588119.

Contains fulltext : 219893.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) BACKGROUND: Treatment of venous thromboembolism in children is based on data obtained in adults with little direct documentation of its efficacy and safety in children. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus standard anticoagulants in children with venous thromboembolism. METHODS: In a multicentre, parallel-group, open-label, randomised study, children (aged 0-17 years) attending 107 paediatric hospitals in 28 countries with documented acute venous thromboembolism who had started heparinisation were assigned (2:1) to bodyweight-adjusted rivaroxaban (tablets or suspension) in a 20-mg equivalent dose or standard anticoagulants (heparin or switched to vitamin K antagonist). Randomisation was stratified by age and venous thromboembolism site. The main treatment period was 3 months (1 month in children /=1 dose), were centrally assessed by investigators who were unaware of treatment assignment. Repeat imaging was obtained at the end of the main treatment period and compared with baseline imaging tests. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02234843 and has been completed. FINDINGS: From Nov 14, 2014, to Sept 28, 2018, 500 (96%) of the 520 children screened for eligibility were enrolled. After a median follow-up of 91 days (IQR 87-95) in children who had a study treatment period of 3 months (n=463) and 31 days (IQR 29-35) in children who had a study treatment period of 1 month (n=37), symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in four (1%) of 335 children receiving rivaroxaban and five (3%) of 165 receiving standard anticoagulants (hazard ratio [HR] 0.40, 95% CI 0.11-1.41). Repeat imaging showed an improved effect of rivaroxaban on thrombotic burden as compared with standard anticoagulants (p=0.012). Major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding in participants who received >/=1 dose occurred in ten (3%) of 329 children (all non-major) receiving rivaroxaban and in three (2%) of 162 children (two major and one non-major) receiving standard anticoagulants (HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.51-6.27). Absolute and relative efficacy and safety estimates of rivaroxaban versus standard anticoagulation estimates were similar to those in rivaroxaban studies in adults. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: In children with acute venous thromboembolism, treatment with rivaroxaban resulted in a similarly low recurrence risk and reduced thrombotic burden without increased bleeding, as compared with standard anticoagulants. FUNDING: Bayer AG and Janssen Research & Development. 01 januari 2020

OBJECTIVES To assess the association between rivaroxaban and warfarin and major bleeding risk in unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients. METHODS Using US MarketScan claims from 1/2012-12/2016, we identified patients who had ≥1 primary hospitalization/emergency department visit diagnosis code for an unprovoked VTE, newly initiated on rivaroxaban or warfarin within 30 days after the VTE and ≥12 months of insurance coverage prior to the VTE. Differences in baseline covariates were adjusted using inverse-probability-of-treatment weights based on propensity scores (residual absolute standardized differences

Introduction For treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), rivaroxaban is given in fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. Patients and methods To determine whether monitoring would enhance its benefit-risk profile, we examined whether peak and trough prothrombin time (PT) values measured in 3797 rivaroxaban-treated patients included in the EINSTEIN DVT and PE studies correlated with subsequent recurrent VTE and major bleeding. In addition, we examined the stability of PT values over time and the impact of clinical variables on PT values. Results The mean peak PT values at months 3 and 6 or 12 were 21.9 ± 5 and 21.7 ± 6.0 s, respectively, while the mean trough PT values at months 2 and 6 were 15.1 ± 5.1 and 15.3 ± 2.9 s, respectively. Although peak and through PT values were higher in females, and with older age, frailty, active cancer, low body weight, impaired renal function and use of moderate to strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein, and were lower in patients taking strong CYP 3A4 inducers, the differences were small and results were overlapping. Neither peak nor trough PT values correlated with recurrent VTE or major bleeding. Conclusions PT monitoring is unlikely to improve the benefit-risk profile of rivaroxaban in patients with DVT or PE. The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT00440193 (EINSTEIN-DVT) and # NCT00439777 (EINSTEIN-PE).

In the Hokusai VTE Cancer study, edoxaban was non-inferior to dalteparin for the composite outcome of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding in 1,050 patients with cancer-associated VTE. The absolute rate of recurrent VTE was 3.4% lower with edoxaban, whereas the absolute rate of major bleeding was 2.9% higher. The present analysis focuses on the sites, clinical presentation, course and outcome of bleeding events, and the associated tumour types. Major bleeds and their severity (categories 1–4) were blindly adjudicated by a committee using a priori defined criteria, and data were analysed in the safety population. Major bleeding occurred in 32 of 522 patients given edoxaban (median treatment duration, 211 days) and in 16 of 524 patients treated with dalteparin (median treatment duration, 184 days); no patients had more than one major bleed. There were no fatal bleeds with edoxaban, and two with dalteparin. Severe bleeding at presentation (category 3 or 4) occurred in 10 (1.9%) and 11 (2.1%) patients in the edoxaban and dalteparin groups, respectively. The excess of major bleeding with edoxaban was confined to patients with gastrointestinal cancer. However, severe major bleeding at presentation (category 3 or 4) in this sub-group occurred in 5 of 165 (3.0%) and in 3 of 140 (2.1%) patients given edoxaban or dalteparin, respectively.In conclusion, this analysis suggests that while oral edoxaban is an appropriate alternative to subcutaneous dalteparin for treatment of cancer-associated VTE, the use of edoxaban in patients with gastrointestinal cancer requires careful benefit–risk weighting.

The optimal duration of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is uncertain. In this prespecified analysis, we used data from 2 randomized trials, which compared once-daily rivaroxaban (20 mg or 10 mg) with aspirin (100 mg) or placebo for extended VTE treatment to estimate the risk of recurrence according to baseline risk factor profiles. Index VTE events were centrally classified as unprovoked, or provoked by major transient or persistent, or minor transient or persistent risk factors, and rates of recurrence at 1 year were calculated. A total of 2832 patients received rivaroxaban; 1131 received aspirin, and 590 received placebo. With unprovoked VTE, rates of recurrence in the 1173 patients given rivaroxaban, the 468 given aspirin, and the 243 given placebo were 2.0%, 5.9%, and 10.0%, respectively. There were no recurrences in patients with VTE provoked by major transient risk factors. With VTE provoked by minor persistent risk factors, recurrence rates in the 1184 patients given rivaroxaban, the 466 given aspirin, and the 248 given placebo were 2.4%, 4.5%, and 10.7%, respectively. For patients with minor transient risk factors, recurrence rates were 0.4% in the 268 patients given rivaroxaban, 4.2% in the 121 given aspirin, and 7.1% in the 56 given placebo. Recurrence rates in patients with VTE provoked by minor persistent or minor transient risk factors were not significantly lower than that with unprovoked VTE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-1.16; and HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.32-1.30, respectively). Therefore, such patients may also benefit from extended anticoagulation therapy.

The effectiveness and safety of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment with rivaroxaban, demonstrated in phase-III trials, needs to be confirmed in daily care. To confirm the positive results of phase-III VTE treatment trials with rivaroxaban in daily care, we used data from the ongoing, prospective, non-interventional Dresden NOAC Registry. For this analysis, only patients with acute VTE who started rivaroxaban within 14days after diagnosis of VTE and who were enrolled within these 14days were evaluated with regard to patient characteristics, treatment persistence and clinical outcomes. Between December 1st 2011 and 30th September 2016, 418 patients with acute VTE and rivaroxaban treatment were enrolled. During rivaroxaban treatment (median rivaroxaban exposure 206d; median follow-up 862d) rates of recurrent VTE and ISTH major bleeding were 1.9% and 3.8%, respectively. At 6months. 58.3% of patients were still taking rivaroxaban, 28.2% had a scheduled end of treatment, 7.2% were switched to other anticoagulants, 1.7% had withdrawn their consent and the remaining 3.6% of patients had unplanned complete discontinuation of anticoagulation. After permanent discontinuation of rivaroxaban, 20 patients experienced a recurrent VTE (7 pulmonary embolism±deep vein thrombosis, 13 deep vein thrombosis) with a mean time between last intake of rivaroxaban and VTE recurrence of 374.3±247.6days (range 28-927d). In daily care patients with acute VTE, rivaroxaban demonstrated high effectiveness with acceptable major bleeding rates. Initial dosing was according to label in over 90% of patients and persistence to rivaroxaban therapy was adequate with low rates of unplanned complete discontinuation.

Screening for primary hypercoagulable states (PHSs) in venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients was not mandated in the EINSTEIN trials; and therefore, few patients with a known PHS were available for analysis. We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin for treatment of VTE in patients with a known PHS.Using MarketScan claims data from 1/2012-9/2015, we identified adults with a primary diagnosis of VTE during a hospitalization/emergency department visit (the index event), with ≥180-days of continuous insurance coverage prior to the index event, a documented diagnosis for a PHS and newly-initiated as an outpatient on rivaroxaban or warfarin within 30-days of the index VTE. Rivaroxaban and warfarin users were 1:1 propensity-score matched. Balance between cohorts was evaluated by inspecting standardized differences for baseline covariates (0.1 considered well-balanced). Patients were followed up to 12-months from the index event or until occurrence of an endpoint, switch/discontinuation of index oral anticoagulation or insurance disenrollment. Rates of recurrent VTE and major bleeding were compared using Cox regression and reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).We matched 403 rivaroxaban and 403 warfarin patients with VTE and a known PHS. All baseline covariates had a standardized difference 0.1. Rivaroxaban use was associated with a non-significant reduction in recurrent VTE (HR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.33-1.49) and major bleeding (HR = 0.55, 95%CI = 0.16-1.86) versus warfarin.In routine practice, the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in VTE patients with a known PHS appears to be similar to that observed in the EINSTEIN trial program.

The management of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) is poorly defined and remains controversial overall. SVT has long been considered a benign, self-limited disease, but recent studies show that SVT carries a nonnegligible risk for recurrence, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism. Current guidelines recommend the use of low-molecular-weight heparin or fondaparinux, but results of several surveys indicate that the majority of patients with SVT receive nonanticoagulant therapy only, which includes compression stockings or bandages, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, topical application of heparin gel, or surgical interventions. However, several recent observational and interventional studies provide better insight into the optimal treatment of patients with SVT who are at different risks for thromboembolic complications. This educational review summarizes the available evidence and aims to provide practical guidance based on a clinical decision pathway.

Background Limited data are available on major bleeding (MB) occurring during treatment with vitamin K (VKAs) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) outside clinical trials. Methods Patients hospitalized for MB while on treatment with VKAs or DOACs were included in a multicenter study to compare clinical presentation, management and outcome of bleeding. The primary study outcome was death at 30days. Results Between September 2013 and September 2015, 806 patients were included in the study, 76% on VKAs and 24% on DOACs. MB was an intracranial hemorrhage in 51% and 21% patients on VKAs or DOACs, respectively (Odds Ratio [OR] 3.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.59–5.54) a gastrointestinal bleeding in 46% and 25% patients on DOACs and VKAs, respectively (OR 2.62; 95% CI 1.87–3.68). Death at 30days occurred in 130 patients (16%), 18% and 9% of VKA and DOAC patients (HR 1.95; 95% CI 1.19–3.22, p=0.008). The rate of death at 30days was similar in VKA and DOAC patients with intracranial hemorrhage (26% and 24%; HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.54–2.02) and gastrointestinal bleeding (11% and 7%; HR 1.46, 95% CI 0.57–3.74) and higher in VKA than DOAC patients with other MBs (10% and 3%; HR 3.42, 95% CI 0.78–15.03). Conclusions Admission for ICH is less frequent for DOAC patients compared with VKA patients. Admission for gastrointestinal MB is more frequent for DOAC as compared to VKA patients. Mortality seems lower in patients with MBs while on DOACs than VKAs but this finding varies across different types of MBs.

Background: The results of the EINSTEIN-DVT/PE and AMPLIFY trials, which compared rivaroxaban and apixaban with conventional anticoagulation therapy for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), respectively, are often compared. However, the trials differed in duration of therapy (3-12 and 6 months, respectively) and in patient selection (few exclusion criteria and more stringent exclusion criteria, respectively).Methods: To determine the effect of these methodological differences on outcomes, the patients enrolled in EINSTEIN-DVT/PE were divided into 2 cohorts; the 5253 patients that matched the exclusion criteria for AMPLIFY and were treated for at least 6 months (cohort 1) and the 2368 patients who would have been ineligible for AMPLIFY (cohort 2).Results: Compared with patients in cohort 2, those in cohort 1 were older and more often male and there were more with unprovoked VTE, prior VTE, cancer and known thrombophilia. In cohort 1, rivaroxaban would have significantly reduced recurrent VTE (relative risk [RR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.95) and major bleeding (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.30-0.82) compared with conventional therapy, whereas the two treatments would have had similar effects on recurrent VTE (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.65-1.79) and major bleeding (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.48-2.18) in cohort 2.Conclusions: This analysis illustrates the influence of patient selection and treatments duration on outcome results and highlights the limitations of cross-trial comparisons. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Essentials The Constans score and D-dimer can rule out upper extremity deep vein thrombosis without imaging. We evaluated the performance of an extended Constans score and an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold. The extended Constans score did not increase the efficiency compared to the original score. Age-adjusted D-dimer testing safely increased the efficiency by 4%, but this needs validation. SummaryBackground Among patients with clinically suspected upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT), a clinical decision rule based on the Constans score combined with D-dimer testing can safely rule out the diagnosis without imaging in approximately one-fifth of patients. Objectives To evaluate the performance of the original Constans score, an extended Constans score and an age-adjusted D-dimer positivity threshold. Methods Data of 406 patients with suspected UEDVT previously enrolled in a multinational diagnostic management study were used. The discriminatory performance, calibration and diagnostic accuracy of the Constans score were evaluated. The Constans score was extended by selecting clinical variables that may have incremental value in detecting UEDVT, conditional on the original Constans score items. The performance of the Constans rule was evaluated in combination with fixed and age-adjusted D-dimer thresholds. Results The original Constans score showed good discriminatory performance (c-statistic, 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76–0.85). An extended Constans score with five additional clinical items improved discriminatory performance and calibration, but this did not translate into a higher efficiency in avoiding imaging tests. Compared with a fixed threshold, age-adjusted D-dimer testing increased the proportion of patients for whom imaging and anticoagulation could be withheld from 21% to 25% (gain, 3.7%; 95% CI, 2.3–6.0%). Conclusions The Constans score has good discriminatory performance in the diagnosis of UEDVT. Age-adjusted D-dimer testing is likely to safely increase the efficiency of the diagnostic algorithm, but this approach needs prospective validation.

The rapid determination of the presence of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in a patient remains a major challenge in emergency medicine and for rapid medical treatment decisions. All DOACs are excreted into urine. A sensitive and specific point-of-care test has been developed to determine whether they are present in patient urine samples. This prospective multicenter study aimed to demonstrate at least 95% correct positive and negative predictive results for factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors in urine samples using DOAC Dipstick pads compared with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (NCT03182829). Nine hundred and fourteen subjects were included and 880 were evaluated per protocol (factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban: n = 451, thrombin inhibitor dabigatran: n = 429) at 18 centers. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and predictive values and agreement between methods for determination of factor Xa inhibitors were at least noninferior to 95% with a 0.5% margin and of thrombin inhibitor superior to 97.5%. These results were compared with LC-MS/MS results in the intention-to-analyze cohort (all p

Background Few data have been published to date on outcomes after the common clinical experience of severe hemorrhage in orally anticoagulated patients. Methods A prospective, multicenter observational study was carried out to investigate outcomes and management in a series of consecutive patients who sustained a severe hemorrhage under treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or direct oral anticoagulant drugs (DOAC). The primary endpoint was in-hospital death up to and including day 30 after hospital admission. The secondary endpoints were the duration of bleeding, in-hospital death due to hemorrhage (as defined by the study physician examining the patient's records), the use of antagonists, the extent of supportive measures used to stop the hemorrhage, and an assessment of causality. Consecutive patients were recruited until a predefined number of patients was reached in both groups. Results Among 193 patients with severe hemorrhage, 97 had been taking a VKA, and 96 had been taking a DOAC. 13.0 % (95% confidence interval [8.6; 18.5]; 25/193) of the overall group patients died in the first 30 days after hospital admission, including 17.5% ([10.6; 26.6]; 17/97) in the VKA group and 8.3% ([3.7; 15.8]; 8/96) in the DOAC group (p = 0.085). The median duration of bleeding was 19.8 hours in the VKA group and 27.8 hours in the DOAC group (p = 0.632). The in-hospital mortality due to hemorrhage was higher in the VKA group than in the DOAC group (15.5% [15/97] versus 4.2% [4/97]; p = 0.014). Only the use of prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) lowered the median duration of hemorrhage in the two patient groups. In 35% (68/193) of the patients, the hemorrhage was caused by an external influence, most commonly a fall. Conclusion The in-hospital mortality was higher among patients treated with VKA than among patients treated with DOAC, although the difference failed to reach statistical significance.