Search

Introduction Some studies report that assessing regional 123I-cardiac MIBG uptake can aid in the diagnosis of Lewy body disease, but others report heterogeneity in healthy controls. We aimed to evaluate regional cardiac MIBG uptake patterns in healthy older adults and patients with dementia. Methods 31 older adults with normal cognition, 15 Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and 17 Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) patients were recruited. 5 individuals had previous myocardial infarction. Participants with sufficient cardiac uptake for regional SPECT analysis (29/31 controls, 15/15 AD, 5/17 DLB) had relative uptake pattern recorded. Controls were assessed for risk of future cardiovascular events using QRISK2, a validated online tool. Results In controls uptake was reduced in the inferior wall (85%), apex (23%), septum (15%), and lateral wall (8%). AD and DLB showed similar patterns to controls. Lung or liver interference was present in 61% of cases. Myocardial infarction cases showed regional reductions in uptake, but normal/borderline planar uptake. In controls, there was no relationship between cardiovascular risk score and uptake pattern. Conclusions Significant variability of regional cardiac 123I-MIBG uptake is common in cases with normal planar cardiac uptake. Heterogeneity of regional uptake appears non-specific and unlikely to aid in the diagnosis of Lewy body disease.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of plasma Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus (KSHV) as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in people living with HIV (PLWH) and diagnosed with KSHV-associated diseases.Using quantitative nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting the open reading frame-26 gene of KSHV, plasma levels of KSHV were measured in consecutive PLWH with KSHV-associated diseases or as part of the investigation of lymphadenopathy.Plasma KSHV assays were performed on samples from 684 PLWH and 20 HIV-seronegative people with KSHV-associated malignancies. In PLWH, plasma KSHV was detected in 39% of those with KS, 99% of those with multicentric Castleman disease (MCD), 9% of those with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), 2% of those with non-AIDS-defining malignancies and 0% of those with nonmalignant lymphadenopathy. There was no significant difference in plasma KSHV viral load among those with KS, MCD and KSHV-associated NHL. The 5-year overall survival rate from KS diagnosis of 335 PLWH was 95.2% (95% confidence interval 92.6-97.8%). Plasma KSHV viraemia did not predict overall survival in those with KS (P = 0.73), nor when those with T0 stage KS (P = 0.52) or T1 stage KS (P = 0.62) were analysed separately.Measuring the plasma levels of KSHV as a biomarker in KSHV-associated disease has a very limited value in either diagnosis or prognostication. The only potential role of clinical value is the suggestion that an undetectable plasma KSHV excludes a diagnosis of MCD in PLWH.

OBJECTIVE—To determine the proportion of the population, firstly, with cholesterol ⩾ 5.0 mmol/l and, secondly, with any cholesterol concentration, who might benefit from statin treatment for the following: secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD); primary prevention at CHD risk 30%, 20%, 15%, and 6% over 10 years; and primary prevention at projected CHD risk 20% over 10 years (CHD risk at age 60 years if actual age

Objective To examine the relationship between coronary (CHD) and cardiovascular (CVD) risk in patients with uncomplicated mild hypertension and to determine the accuracy of using CHD risk > or = 15% over 10 years to identify for antihypertensive treatment those patients with CVD risk > or = 20% over 10 years as advised in recent British guidelines. Design Comparison of decisions made using CHD risk > or = 15% over 10 years calculated by the Framingham risk function and estimated using a simple table with CVD risk > or = 20% over 10 years. Setting British population. Subjects People aged 35-64 years with uncomplicated mild systolic hypertension (SBP 140-159 mmHg, n = 624) from the 1995 Scottish Health Survey. Main outcome measures Relationship between CHD and CVD risk. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV). Results CHD risk 15% over 10 years was equivalent to CVD risk 21% over 10 years. Exact CHD risk > or = 15% over 10 years had sensitivity 79%, specificity 98%, PPV 94% and NPV 93% in detecting CVD risk > or = 20% over 10 years. Use of the table to estimate CHD risk > or = 15% over 10 years gave sensitivity 88%, specificity 90%, PPV 76% and NPV 95%. Conclusion CHD risk appears acceptably accurate for targeting treatment in mild hypertension. The risk assessment table, which slightly overestimates CHD risk, was more sensitive in identifying patients with CVD risk > or = 20% over 10 years and may be preferable to using exact CHD risk. European guidelines which suggest targeting treatment for mild hypertension at CHD risk > or = 20% over 10 years are over-conservative compared with British guidelines.

To examine the accuracy of a new version of the Sheffield table designed to aid decisions on lipids screening and detect thresholds for risk of coronary heart disease needed to implement current guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.Comparison of decisions made on the basis of the table with absolute risk of coronary heart disease or cardiovascular disease calculated by the Framingham risk function. The decisions related to statin treatment when coronary risk is/=30% over 10 years; aspirin treatment when the risk is/=15% over 10 years; and the treatment of mild hypertension when the cardiovascular risk is/=20% over 10 years.The table is designed for use in general practice.Random sample of 1000 people aged 35-64 years from the 1995 Scottish health survey.Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the table.13% of people had a coronary risk of/=15%, and 2. 2% a risk of/=30%, over 10 years. 22% had mild hypertension (systolic blood pressure 140-159 mm Hg). The table indicated lipids screening for everyone with a coronary risk of/=15% over 10 years, for 95% of people with a ratio of total cholesterol to high density lipoprotein cholesterol of/=8.0, but for50% with a coronary risk of5% over 10 years. Sensitivity and specificity were 97% and 95% respectively for a coronary risk of/=15% over 10 years; 82% and 99% for a coronary risk of/=30% over 10 years; and 88% and 90% for a cardiovascular risk of/=20% over 10 years in mild hypertension.The table identifies all high risk people for lipids screening, reduces screening of low risk people by more than half, and ensures that treatments are prescribed appropriately to those at high risk, while avoiding inappropriate treatment of people at low risk.

Summary When used for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease, treatment with an inhibitor of hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme-A reductase results in worthwhile benefit that clearly exceeds any risk in patients whose risk of coronary death is 1·5% or more per year. This evidence can be extrapolated logically to primary prevention of coronary disease provided that treatment is targeted at those with similar or higher risk. We present a table that refines previously proposed methods of risk prediction. The table identifies subjects who have the specified degree of coronary risk; shows the serum cholesterol concentration that confers that degree of risk in the individual; and identifies subjects who will not have this degree of risk, irrespective of their cholesterol concentration. It is simple enough for use in ordinary practice. The table highlights the predominant effect of age on coronary risk; a person who is free of vascular disease and younger than 52 years is unlikely to have the specified degree of risk. Even in older people (60-70 years) several risk factors are generally required to attain this degree of risk. Some people are candidates for lipid-lowering drug treatment with serum cholesterol as low as 5·5 mmol/L, whereas others with cholesterol as high as 9·0 mmol/L are not. Although cholesterol lowering is a powerful method for preventing coronary events in people at high risk, cholesterol measurement by itself is not a good way to identify those with high coronary risk. The method can be adapted readily to target a different level of coronary risk as new evidence on the benefit and risk of treatment becomes available.

1. The 4-hydroxylation of propranolol by rat and human liver microsomes is associated with formation of a chemically reactive species which binds irreversibly to cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6) destroying its catalytic function. Therefore, the effect of propranolol treatment (80 mg twice daily) on debrisoquine phenotype was examined, to see if it resulted in phenocopying in vivo. The role of 4-hydroxypropranolol (4OHP) in the inhibition of CYP2D6 activity was also studied using microsomes from yeast expressing CYP2D6 and from human livers; metoprolol was used as the CYP2D6 substrate. 2. Although a significant effect on apparent oxidation phenotype was demonstrated, the absolute change in the urinary debrisoquine/4-hydroxydebrisoquine ratio (D/4HD) was small, such that no extensive metaboliser who received propranolol treatment was reclassified as a poor metaboliser. The in vitro studies indicated that 4OHP is a potent inhibitor of metoprolol metabolism (Ki approximately 1 microM). This inhibitory effect was enhanced when 4OHP was pre-incubated in the presence of a NADPH generating system and human liver microsomes. The effect was decreased significantly when reduced glutathione was added to the pre-incubation mixture. Metabolism of 4OHP occurred when incubated with human liver microsomes in the presence of a NADPH generating system and irrespective of CYP2D6 phenotype; yeast expressing CYP2D6 did not metabolise 4OHP. 3. We conclude that, although treatment with propranolol 80 mg twice daily significantly decreases the catalytic function of CYP2D6, the inhibition is insufficient to result in phenocopying. The reactive intermediate produced by further metabolism of 4OHP is probably scavenged effectively in vivo by glutathione and other nucleophiles.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of unilateral and bilateral ventralis intermedius (Vim) deep brain stimulation (DBS) on mood and motor function.Thirty-one consecutive medication refractory patients with essential tremor who underwent unilateral or bilateral Vim DBS at University of Florida and returned for at least 6 -month follow-up completed the Visual Analog Mood (VAMS), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Tremor Rating Scale (TRS) before and after surgery. We excluded all patients who were implanted at other institutions.The tense subscale of the VAMS improved significantly in both the unilateral and bilateral DBS groups (P0.001). On the VAMS afraid subscale, only the bilateral group trended toward improvement (P = 0.075). There were no significant changes for either group for the happy, confused, sad, angry, energetic or tired VAMS scores. TRS subscale scores all improved after unilateral and bilateral Vim DBS surgery (P0.001).Feelings of tenseness, tremor severity and ADLs improved following unilateral or bilateral Vim DBS for ET.

Increasingly HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are being used for primary prevention of vascular disease in patients with a raised cholesterol but at low absolute risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). This study uses clinical trial results to explore the limits of absolute safety for statin use in such patients.The major placebo controlled statin outcome trials were identified by automated and manual literature searches. Principal results including all cause mortality in placebo and intervention groups and baseline values of standard coronary risk factors were abstracted for each trial. For the trials identified the reduction in overall mortality with statin treatment for each study was regressed against the underlying CHD risk of the population recruited into that trial using a statistically robust method.The regression line describing the relationship between mortality benefit and risk suggests that statin use could be associated with an increase in mortality of 1% in 10 years. This would be sufficiently large to negate statin's beneficial effect on CHD mortality in patients with a CHD event risk less than 13% over 10 years.Absolute safety of statins has not been demonstrated for patients at low risk of CHD. Patients absolute risk of CHD should be calculated before starting statin treatment for primary prevention. Extensions of such treatment to low risk patients should await further evidence of safety.

We report an intramedullary primary solitary fibrous tumour of the cervical spinal cord in a 33-year-old man. The tumour predominantly consisted of monomorphic spindle cells with a storiform pattern. MRI demonstrated an inhomogeneously enhancing cervical intramedullary tumour. The patient was well without recurrence 18 months after surgery.

Most recent guidelines advise targeting of lipid lowering for primary prevention at those at high absolute coronary (CHD) risk. We compared the accuracy of five CHD risk assessment methods in identifying such patients: one based on total cholesterolor = 6.5 mmol/l plus two risk factors, and four based on the Framingham risk function (the European Task Force chart and Sheffield table, both using total cholesterol and the New Zealand chart and modified Sheffield table, both using total: HDL cholesterol ratio) for predicting CHD event riskor = 2% per year, calculated by an independent risk function, PROCAM, in 126 treated hypertensive men. Cholesterol threshold plus two risk factors had sensitivity 59% and specificity 63%, did not identify some very high-risk patients, and identified very low-risk patients. Framingham-based methods using total cholesterol alone had sensitivity 90-98% and specificity 37-43%, and identified high-risk patients well, but identified some patients at very low risk. Methods based on total: HDL cholesterol ratio had sensitivity 90-98% and specificity 60-63%, and did not identify incorrectly patients at very low CHD risk. Methods based on cholesterol threshold and counting of risk factors are too inaccurate for targeting drug therapy for primary prevention of CHD. Framingham-based methods should incorporate HDL-cholesterol as the total: HDL cholesterol ratio.

Background There is broad agreement that statin treatment should be targeted at absolute coronary heart disease (CHD) risk but no consensus on the level of risk to target. We have examined the implications of adopting three different treatment policies for the management of hypertensive patients in the UK using data from treated hypertensives aged 35-69 years included in the Health Survey for England (1993). Methods We calculated the proportion of hypertensive patients with existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease requiring statin treatment for secondary prevention of CHD. For those without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (primary prevention), we estimated CHD risk from the Framingham equation and examined the proportion with CHD risk exceeding thresholds of 4.5, 3 and 1.5% per year. Results Twenty-one percent of treated hypertensives would require statin treatment for secondary prevention of CHD. When the CHD event threshold for statin treatment was set at > or =4.5% per year [equivalent to a number needed to treat (NNT) in 5 years of 13] a further 0.6% of hypertensive patients were identified for treatment; at a threshold of 3.0% per year (NNT = 20) 5.5% of patients were identified for primary prevention; and at a threshold of 1.5% per year (NNT = 40) 28.5% of patients were identified for primary prevention. Conclusions Those needing secondary prevention are first priority for statins and 21% of hypertensive patients will require treatment Formulation of guidelines for primary prevention should take into account the NNT; the proportion of patients targeted for treatment; the cost-effectiveness and the total cost of treatment. Current British guidance will entail treating an additional 5.5% of hypertensive patients for primary prevention and therefore 27% of hypertensive patients.

OBJECTIVES—To estimate the cost effectiveness of statin treatment in preventing coronary heart disease (CHD) and to examine the effect of the CHD risk level targeted and the cost of statins on the cost effectiveness of treatment. DESIGN—Cohort life table method using data from outcome trials. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—The cost per life year gained for lifelong statin treatment at annual CHD event risks of 4.5% (secondary prevention) and 3.0%, 2.0%, and 1.5% (all primary prevention), with the cost of statins varied from £100 to £800 per year. RESULTS—The costs per life year gained according to annual CHD event risk were: for 4.5%, £5100; 3.0%, £8200; 2.0%, £10 700; and 1.5%, £12 500. Reducing the cost of statins increases cost effectiveness, and narrows the difference in cost effectiveness across the range of CHD event risks. CONCLUSIONS—At current prices statin treatment for secondary prevention, and for primary prevention at a CHD event risk 3.0% per year, is as cost effective as many treatments in wide use. Primary prevention at lower CHD event risks (

Weight reduction, moderate salt restriction and alcohol reduction are effective in lowering blood pressure (BP), and are feasible interventions for long-term management of hypertension. When used in combination these non-pharmacological measures are significantly inferior to drug therapy in anti-hypertensive effect. When they are implemented as a first step in the treatment of mild hypertension, resorting to drug therapy only if non-pharmacological measures fail, anti-hypertensive drugs can be avoided in about 40% of patients. However, BP control is again significantly inferior with this strategy compared with drug therapy without non-pharmacological advice. Those given advice on non-pharmacological measures may therefore have suboptimal protection against cardiovascular complications. This is particularly so when the threshold for drug treatment is set at a DBP ofor = 100 mmHg, as many patients will be left untreated with DBPs between 90 and 99 mm Hg as a result of non-pharmacological measures. Non-pharmacological treatment may thus stand between patients and anti-hypertensive drug therapy, which nowadays is simple, well-tolerated, safe and proven effective in preventing cardiovascular disease. The role of non-pharmacological therapy needs to be reconsidered.

Guidelines for the management of hypertension, and those for hyperlipidaemia, advocate measurement of cholesterol in all hypertensive subjects. It is suggested that knowledge of serum cholesterol should influence the choice of anti-hypertensive agent because thiazides and beta-blockers may influence lipids adversely. However, the changes in lipids associated with low-dose thiazides and beta-blockers are small, not sustained and do not appear to affect prognosis adversely. Some believe that knowledge of serum cholesterol may help target the treatment of mild hypertension more accurately by predicting an increased risk of vascular complications of hypertension. However, serum cholesterol does not predict the risk of cardiovascular complications in hypertensive women. It does predict coronary heart disease (but not stroke) in men, but coronary risk can be estimated satisfactorily without knowledge of serum cholesterol. Suggestions that cholesterol should be lowered in hypercholesterolaemic hypertensive patients to reduce the incidence of coronary heart disease are understandable. However, the diet recommended for this has no useful effect on serum cholesterol, and the benefit of lipid-lowering drugs for cholesterol reduction only exceeds the risk in patients at very high risk of coronary mortality, for example those who have had a myocardial infarction. Hypertension alone will not place individuals at high enough risk to warrant drug therapy for cholesterol reduction. We conclude that the current guidelines are incorrect, and that routine measurement of cholesterol in all hypertensive patients is not justified.

SIR—We regret that there was an important error in the Sheffield table (Aug 10, p 387), and a corrected version is presented on p 1252. The error in the original was in the table for men only, and arose because the column headings indicating different combinations of risk factors were accidentally transposed as the final table was prepared. Thus the numbers in the table are correct, but do not always correspond to the risk factor combinations shown above them. We are aware that some colleagues have used the table to evaluate individuals, and will want to know what the practical consequences may be. The inaccurate table still predicts, on average, a coronary heart disease (CHD) event rate of 3·0% per year. For eight of the twelve columns in the table for men the risk targeted was acceptably accurate, ranging from 2·8 to 3·2% CHD events per year. Two of the columns would target treatment at men with a lower CHD risk—1·9% and 2·3% per year, respectively. Statin treatment is readily justifiable at this level of risk and this inaccuracy should therefore cause no harm. However, in two columns men were signalled as not needing treatment when their risk of CHD was in fact substantially higher than 3·0% per year—at 3·8% and 4·2% per year. These men should be reassessed by the corrected Sheffield table reproduced overleaf. They can in fact be identified readily, because they are all men with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) shown by electrocardiography. We therefore suggest that any man with hypertension plus LVH who was assessed by the Sheffield table and not treated should be reassessed with the corrected table. We apologise to colleagues for any inconvenience caused by our error.

EDITOR,--The OXCHECK study showed significant reductions in total cholesterol concentration (3.1%) and blood pressure (2.5/1.5 mm Hg) with health checks over three years.1 The reductions in cholesterol concentration are in line with responses shown in previous controlled trials.2 The authors seem in some doubt about whether these effects are large enough to justify the cost of the health checks. This may be clearer when the projected …

Thirty-seven cases of second and third degree haemorrhoids have been treated by cryosurgery. Although the number of cases treated is small and the follow-up is short, we are greatly encouraged by the early excellent results. It is a simple and effective procedure with minimal complications, and it is especially recommended for those patients who are medically unfit for general anaesthesia. The rapidity of this procedure combined with the painless operative and postoperative course enables the patient to leave hospital the next day. More cases with long-term follow-up are needed before adequate evaluation of this form of treatment can be made.