1. Are the school prevention programmes-aimed at de-normalizing smoking among youths-beneficial in the long term? An example from the Smoke Free Class Competition in Italy
- Author
-
Zagà, V, Giordano, F, Gremigni, P, Amram, D. L, De Blasi, A, Amendola, M, Osborn, J. F, Cattaruzza, M. S., and Zagà Vincenzo, Giordano F, Gremigni Paola, Amram DL , De Blasi A, Amendola M, Osborn JF, Cattaruzza MZ
- Subjects
Male ,School ,Schools ,Time Factors ,Youth ,Adolescent ,Prevention ,education ,Smoking Prevention ,de-normalization ,prevention ,school ,tobacco smoking ,youth ,Tobacco smoking ,De-normalization ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Smoke-Free Policy ,Italy ,Humans ,Female ,Follow-Up Studies ,Program Evaluation - Abstract
Tobacco smoking by young people is of great concern because it usually leads to regular smoking, nicotine addiction and quitting difficulties. Young people "hooked" by tobacco maintain the profits of the tobacco industry by replacing smokers who quit or die. If new generations could be tobacco-free, as supported by tobacco endgame strategies, the tobacco epidemic could end within decades. Smoking prevention programmes for teens are offered by schools with the aim to prevent or delay smoking onset. Among these, the Smoke Free Class Competition (SFC) was widely implemented in Europe. Its effectiveness yielded conflicting results, but it was only evaluated at short/medium term (6 - 18 months). The aim of this study is to evaluate its effectiveness after a longer follow-up (3 to 5 years) in order to allow enough time for the maturing of the students and the internalization of the experience and its contents. Fifteen classes were randomly sampled from two Italian high schools of Bologna province that regularly offered the SFC to first year students; 382 students (174 participating in the SFC and 208 controls) were retrospectively followed-up and provided their "smoking histories". At the end of their last year of school (after 5 years from the SFC), the percentage of students who stated that they were regular smokers was lower among the SFC students than in controls: 13.5% vs 32.9% (p=0.03). From the students' "smoking histories", statistically significant protective ORs were observed for SFC students at the end of 1st and 5th year: 0.42 (95% CI 0.19-0.93) and 0.32 (95% CI 0.11-0.91) respectively. Absence of smokers in the family was also a strongly statistically significant factor associated with being a non-smoker student. These results suggest that SFC may have a positive impact on lowering the prevalence of smoking in the long term (5 years).
- Published
- 2017